If someone posts an incorrect answer, then I think it is more helpful
to say not only that the answer is incorrect, but how and why.
Be that as it may...
I answered as I did because to me the original poster's question was
ambiguous. It asked how a station can be "not heard directly" yet be
"present on the map" and offered as one example a particular station.
I read it as a general question, not a specific question about that
particular station.
The phrasing of the question puzzled me and it seemed to me that some
unstated questions may be lurking in the background, that are specific
to this station. In the list of raw packets from IU0CPY-1 [1] why is
the relay station APOT30 not a link? Why does the IU0CPY-1 info page
[2] not list APOT30 as hearing IU0CPY-1 directly?
There is a raw packets page for APOT30 [3]:
2016-11-23 00:41:22 MST: APOT30>APOT30,K7SOB-13*,K3ARL-5*,WIDE2*,CLAYTN*,WIDE1*,WIDE1-2,qAR,W3OI:T#00 [Unsupported packet format]
2016-11-26 05:53:28 MST: APOT30>APOT30,9M4RDG-3*,9W2VHF-3*,9W2EW*,qAS,9W2WHT-1:`m@to^nj/]"4S}TRAVEL [Invalid characters in mic-e packet]
[1]
http://aprs.fi/?c=raw&call=IU0CPY-1
[2]
http://aprs.fi/info/a/IU0CPY-1
[3]
http://aprs.fi/?c=raw&call=APOT30
Una Smith, KE5CEP