for statements

[kys...@gmail.com]

 What is the problem I cant understand




For (a=0.1 to 0.9 by 0.1,

 (1500+a)*x1+(6000+a)* x2+(1500+a)*x3+(3000+a)*x4 +(3000+a)*x5+
(1500+a)*x6+(4500+a)*x7+(4500+a)*x8+(300+a)*x9 +(1500+a)*x10=l=(10000-a);

(0.4*a)*x1+(1.2+0.4*a)*x2+(0.4*a)*x3+(0.6+0.4*a)*x4 +(0.6+0.4*a)*x5+(0.4*a)*x6 +
(0.6+0.4*a)*x7+(0.6+0.4*a)*x8+ (0.6+0.4*a)*x9+(0.6+0.4*a)*x10=l=(4-a);


Z.l=(16.14-10.16*a)*X1.l + (4.2-1.85 *a)*X2.l +(4.5-2.11*a)* X3.l+(2.04-1.52*a)*X4.l+
(12.8-8.32*a)*X5.l+(21.5-17.02 *a)*x6.l +(2.45-1.31 *a)*x7.l +(2.82-1.64*a)*x8.l +(3.89-2.67*a)*x9.l+(5.2-2.79*a)*x10.l;

   Display X1.L,X2.L,X3.L,X4.L,X5.L,X6.L, X7.L,X8.L,X9.L,X10.L,Z.l,A;

);


My problem about ")" but I write correctly ? What is the problem  ?

[Robert Fourer]

Your statements are not in the syntax of the AMPL modeling language. If you want to use these statements, you'll need to use different software (they look sort of like GAMS); if you want to convert them to AMPL, the algebraic statements will be much the same, but other details of the syntax will be different.

Bob Fourer
4...@ampl.com

=======