For those with the "Band of Brothers" Syndrome
Daryl Hunt
Do a search on military.com. it's pretty cut and dried. While
not being the definative source, it's pretty accurate. And
pretty blank. No imbellishment at all. That's for the Greenes
and the Chalks out there.
I did a search for Rich and Richard Greene E-7 US Army and got
bupkis. No Rich or Richard Greene listed as any rank.
I get the same search for Sydney Chalk. Bupkis for any rank.
There was a listing but it's for an Active Duty Green
Richard Green
Service
Army
Status
Active Duty
Paygrade
E-7
Wonder why this is?
here is Paul Carriers entry in there.
Paul Carrier
Service
Army
Status
Active Duty
Paygrade
E-6
Wa
Nigel Brooks 2 entries
Nigel Brooks
Service
Army
Status
Veteran/Prior Service
Paygrade
E-4
Tx
Nigel Brooks
Service
Army
Status
Other
Paygrade
O-2
Mi
And here is mine:
Daryl Hunt
Service
Air Force
Status
Retired Military
Paygrade
E-6
Co
Even Dougie is in there.
Douglas Reiman
Service
Army
Status
Veteran/Prior Service
Paygrade
E-7
The gigs up Greene, you aren't listed. Even Carrier in the
Guards is listed and the info is correct on him. You are a fake.
Tankfixer
says...
Unfortunatly for Hunt he can't even quote the site correctly.
So how can you truse anything he says..
The Paul Carrier in Washington is a SGM.. not me mind you but he and I
have corrosponded..
In fact last time I we did he wasn't in washington state at all...
Daryl Hunt
That Paul Carrier is a SSG. Not a SGM. But you might be
correct, active duties will show up there. You might now since
you are a Guard. But even Dougie shows up in there. Scary isn't it.
Daryl Hunt
Got an organization looking into Green. If Green was active
duty, he should be in there even if the rank isn't correct.
There should be something, not nothing. Your buddy Sydney Chalk
isn't in there either. But the rest of us Active Duty people are.
Daryl Hunt
Oh, you mean this Paul Carrier
Paul Carrier
Service
Army
Status
Active Duty
Paygrade
E-9
Rank
Sergeant Major
Yuppers, it has both of you.
Tankfixer
dh...@nospami70west.com says...
There are TWO of us on active duty you fool..
Can't you search your own source correctly ?
Daryl Hunt
> In article<i813g9$8qn$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
I did. You both are listed. There is a Paul Carrier SGM and a
Paul Carrier SSG. I won't call you a fool but you need to stay
tuned and watch.
Already started to bag Greene on his Embellishments. He retired
an E-6 not an E-7. His records are being forwarded to me by an
organization that doesn't care for embellishment. Guess what,
Greene, you get to make a list of fakes.
Tankfixer
dh...@nospami70west.com says...
Daryl, you do know that is a private website ?
Not DOD in anyway.
Just how were you able to look me up ?
You had to register first, didn't you..
> There should be something, not nothing. Your buddy Sydney Chalk
> isn't in there either. But the rest of us Active Duty people are.
How would you know ?
You can't seem to search that site correctly..
Tankfixer
dh...@nospami70west.com says...
Well lookie there.. I was right..
You figure out yet that the only people there are people who choose to
join the site ?
Tankfixer
You know it now that I pointed it out to you..
And Military.com has his location wrong..
But you can't verify that since you can't get into AKO..
Daryl Hunt
> In article<i81423$dk5$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
You figure out that they list as many as they can glean from
public records? I was in there long before I signed up. You
honestly believe any of have any secrets of our military Career?
You are disillusioned once again.
Daryl Hunt
> In article<i814u1$fif$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
I already stated it wasn't a difinative source. It has some
things incorrect. But all of us are in there even if it's an old
address. Look at Greene, his whole records are public record.
So are mine and so are yours. Outside of something listed as TS,
it's all there. Ever wonder why I knew your unit, town, state
and even your address? It's all there if we take the time to
look. Are you aware you were once quoted in the local Newspaper?
The "Band of Brothers" tirade is ended. Now we play the records
game. One that any one of you aholes could have done at any time
in my case and this would haven't gone on for more than a decade.
Time to let the grownups on the field.
Daryl Hunt
> In article<i813jv$8qn$2...@news.eternal-september.org>,
Squirm boy. Squirm. But you aren't the target. Keep it that
way. I already know quite a bit about you but choose not to
release it in here, unlike you when dealing with me. I have
rules I play by. You don't seem to have any when you are dealing
with me. Careful, I may play by your rules where there aren't any.
Greene doesn't have any and that is exactly how I am going to
play. But his info isn't coming from military.com. His is
coming from an organization that hunt out fakes and embellishers.
No rules anymore with Greene.
Tankfixer
it wil lbe fun to watch you make up crap, again.
Tankfixer
Not surprised at all, since they have printed letters to the editor from
me.
Daryl Hunt
> In article<i816k2$kuj$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
Don't need to do a thing with you. All you are doing is just
making things worse for Greene. I do enjoy that. He deserves
every piece of grief he gets at this time.
He didn't retire an E-7, he retired an E-7
He isn't 69, he's 65.
How many other items has he lied about. But you just keep
supporting him. Not the first time you have supported a fake and
got caught doing it.
Maybe Dougie isn't all the way wrong about Nigel either. I don't
know. I don't have a reason to look into that.
Daryl Hunt
> In article<i8166s$jbr$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> The only way it knows anything is if you add the info.
Wrong answer. It had me in there twice at one time. One as an
E-5 as a Mechanic and one as an E-6 as a Manager and retired. I
didn't put in that information. It already had it. I notice the
E-5 is no longer listed. What do you think your POS buddy Mike P
used to try and say I got out as an E-5? You don't like the
rules? You 404thk00ks made them. Now, live by them.
When you are shooting at someone, don't complain when they start
shooting back. It's only whining at that point.
Daryl Hunt
> In article<i816dl$kev$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
actually, it was an article dealing with some things going on at
your Post. You must have not bought that edition.
Tankfixer
If it's not about me then you sure are wasting allot of time
researching..
>
> He didn't retire an E-7, he retired an E-7
> He isn't 69, he's 65.
Who cares ?
>
> How many other items has he lied about. But you just keep
> supporting him. Not the first time you have supported a fake and
> got caught doing it.
I've told you a dozen time Dumbmeat, I"m not supporting you or anyone
else.
Tankfixer
It had the same name in there twice..
Who knows, maybe you hve a smarter twin.
Tankfixer
Daryl Hunt
> In article<i8171g$kvb$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
He may have lied. The records aren't here yet and the ones I
have seen have some holes in them. But not to worry, his life
just became very, very public.
>
>>
>> How many other items has he lied about. But you just keep
>> supporting him. Not the first time you have supported a fake and
>> got caught doing it.
>
> I've told you a dozen time Dumbmeat, I"m not supporting you or anyone
> else.
As long as you continue this, you are just burying the posts like
you always do. Well, puppy dog, at one point I am going to play
by your rules. When I do you are going to cry foul. When you
are shooting at another person and don't have rules yourself,
don't complain when they shoot back and play by the very same
rules you do. Complaining about it is just whining. Care to play?
Daryl Hunt
> In article<i817di$kvb$3...@news.eternal-september.org>,
I did, it wasn't much. You got one line in the whole thing. Go
find it.
Daryl Hunt
> Tankfixer<paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:MPG.270db87...@news.eternal-september.org:
>
>>
>> Well lookie there.. I was right..
>> You figure out yet that the only people there are people who choose to
>> join the site ?
>>
>>
>
>
> addresses, which can pull sat photos of the property. I have found
> http://www.zabasearch.com/ to be best for my purposes, then plug the
> address into bing.com for maps. Searchbug is ok, but shorter retention,
> and their maps only work about half the time. Sbug *is* better to find
> current active phones and you can buy more detailed reports.
>
> There hasn't been a decent mil directory since GWI, before that you could
> look up folks by name.
>
>
> Pepperoni
>
>
Use them all. You get a pretty good picture when you compile
all of them together.
Nigel Brooks
"Daryl Hunt" <dh...@i70westnospam.com> wrote in message
news:VnToo.10648$7B3....@newsfe05.iad...
That is not a definitive listing.
That particular site contains entries made by the individuals themselves. I
would have listed that I was a General if I had wanted to.
NARA is the only way to definitively verify service.
Nigel Brooks
news:i8171g$kvb$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
Feel free to look into it.
And also be aware that I am on that site because I made the entry.
As I have told you over and over and over - the only definitive way to prove
service in the US Armed Forces is by obtaining copies of the actual records
from the US Government through an FOIA.
Tankfixer
And we know you lie, repeatedly.
>
>
> >
> >>
> >> How many other items has he lied about. But you just keep
> >> supporting him. Not the first time you have supported a fake and
> >> got caught doing it.
> >
> > I've told you a dozen time Dumbmeat, I"m not supporting you or anyone
> > else.
>
>
> As long as you continue this, you are just burying the posts like
> you always do. Well, puppy dog, at one point I am going to play
> by your rules. When I do you are going to cry foul. When you
> are shooting at another person and don't have rules yourself,
> don't complain when they shoot back and play by the very same
> rules you do. Complaining about it is just whining. Care to play?
So you are going lash out at people and claim they did things they never
did..
Typical Daryl Hunt psychosis, everyone is out to get you.
The more you post the more you act like Reiman.
Tankfixer
Funny thing is I don't recall being interviewed about that. My
interaction with the media in an official capacity was limited to going
to ask a camera crew to reposition a few feet so they didn't broadcast
some force protection measures.
They were very obliging and moved it without a bit of complaint.
Can't see why they might have quoted me..
So without further proof I'd have to say you are lying, again.
Tankfixer
tras...@hotmail.com says...
> > You figure out yet that the only people there are people who choose to
> > join the site ?
> >
> >
>
>
> addresses, which can pull sat photos of the property. I have found
> http://www.zabasearch.com/ to be best for my purposes, then plug the
> address into bing.com for maps. Searchbug is ok, but shorter retention,
> and their maps only work about half the time. Sbug *is* better to find
> current active phones and you can buy more detailed reports.
>
> There hasn't been a decent mil directory since GWI, before that you could
> look up folks by name.
>
Not a decent open directory.
If you have access to AKO you can look up service memebers, I've had to
use it on occasion to find the PBO for units we don't normally deal
with.
CWL Janitor
"Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:8gjls5...@mid.individual.net...
the other thing numbnuts needs to know if there will be more than one DD214
at NARA I've got 6 of em I'm sure and I was in the military for only
15yrs
Rich Greene
On 9/30/10 12:57 AM, in article
MPG.270dc69...@news.eternal-september.org, "Tankfixer"
<paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
OH NO. I really didn't serve my country? I really wasn't court martialed?
Gee.
FWIW, there was and maybe still is a Vietnam veteran database online. I'm
in it but several people I know are not. You cannot rely upon any
non-Government source for verification of military service, period. NPRC is
the only way to go for the Army. The other services probably have their own
records centers, but the Army is at 9700 Page Blvd, St Louis, MO 63132. I
know that by memory since I've typed it thousands of times forwarding
records and paperwork to them.
I could say my military service is of no concern to anyone, however, if
anyone suspects that I am not a real military retiree, I would be more than
happy to prove it by various means, but I would suggest you first check with
the records center. You might get more than you asked for. So have at it.
Rich SFC U.S. Army Retired (Nov 1, 1982)
Rich Greene
I'm not registered with them. That's how they create their database.
On 9/30/10 12:23 AM, in article
MPG.270dbec...@news.eternal-september.org, "Tankfixer"
Rich Greene
On 9/29/10 11:19 PM, in article
MPG.270dab1...@news.eternal-september.org, "Tankfixer"
<paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In article <VnToo.10648$7B3....@newsfe05.iad>, dh...@i70westnospam.com
Unfortunately Hunt cannot discern between a real Government website vs a
private website that gets it's information from registrations. Maybe he
should check with Phil?
Daryl Hunt
You made it mine. Careful what you wish for.
>
> Rich SFC U.S. Army Retired (Nov 1, 1982)
That's the first truth I have ever seen you type yet.
>
Daryl Hunt
> TOP POST: Military.com = maybe the reason my name didn't show up is because
> I'm not registered with them. That's how they create their database.
Wrong answer. They don't generate them that way. I was listed
as two different entries until I registered. Then they got the
info correct and dropped the older entry. I didn't ask them to
drop the older one, they just did. But like all other DB out
there, it's not definitive but a useful tool.
Daryl Hunt
Got one for every 4 years. That's 6. 2 year committments were
never the AF way. This numnutz enjoys the kind of life that I do
what I want and am back working for myself once again. Happy
camper over here. But do keep sending that money. It's appreciated.