Re: Forte 6 registration key

[Stephen Wolstenholme]

On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 00:50:49 -0500, Biff Pow Boom <Bi...@Pow.Com>
wrote:

>A while back, someone shared their forte 6 reg key. Does anyone remember what it
>was?

Yes. I remember my own as well.

Steve

--
Neural Network Software. http://www.npsl1.com
EasyNN-plus. Neural Networks plus. http://www.easynn.com
SwingNN. Forecast with Neural Networks. http://www.swingnn.com
JustNN. Just Neural Networks. http://www.justnn.com

[Jim Tavendale]

On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 00:50:49 -0500, Biff Pow Boom <Bi...@Pow.Com>

broadcast:

>A while back, someone shared their forte 6 reg key. Does anyone remember what it
>was?

IIRC it's:-
https://www.forteinc.com/agent/order-form.php

Jim Tavendale

[steve...@clara.co.uk]

On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 00:50:49 -0500, Biff Pow Boom <Bi...@Pow.Com> wrote:

> A while back, someone shared their forte 6 reg key. Does anyone remember what it
> was?

Yes and I scrambled it several times so go buy it.

[A.N.Other]

On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 00:50:49 -0500, Biff Pow Boom <Bi...@Pow.Com>
wrote:

>A while back, someone shared their forte 6 reg key. Does anyone remember what it
>was?

Try this...

A6444-N5464-X7435-H4560-B3644

[steven...@bigfoot.com]

Sounds like a FORD part number - 2007 rear spring for Bronco?

[Miner...@live.com]

On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 00:50:49 -0500, Biff Pow Boom
<Bi...@Pow.Com> wrote:

>A while back, someone shared their forte 6 reg key. Does anyone remember what it
>was?

No, but you can have your own if you legally purchase a
copy!

[Derek]

On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 00:50:49 -0500, Biff Pow Boom <Bi...@Pow.Com>
wrote:

>A while back, someone shared their forte 6 reg key. Does anyone remember what it
>was?

UYK3KWEU-W1JA333J-S72G5C9G-SVN2UNAU-83AUZLWU-Y8JZEB4X
VHVJFYBL-4HXHTZYE-BW24V71B-WT4B3ERL-HJY5PE3R-9BPSC9K5
TJZ9ZLV2-6LDF1RHW

And to check that it's a genuine key, go to the thread where I posted
originally posted it.
http://tinyurl.com/cfe5ltq
Don't compromise your PC by using cracks found on the web. Use my
genuine, fully-paid for key.

[steven...@bigfoot.com]

On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 17:13:45 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 00:50:49 -0500, Biff Pow Boom <Bi...@Pow.Com>
> wrote:
>
> >A while back, someone shared their forte 6 reg key. Does anyone remember what it
> >was?
>

> UYK3KWEU-W1JA333J-S72G5C9G-SVN3UNAU-83AUZLWU-Y8JZEB4X
> VHVJFYBL-4HXHTZXE-BW24V71B-WT4B3ERL-HJY5PE2R-9BPSC8K5

> TJZ9ZLV2-6LDF1RHW
>
> And to check that it's a genuine key, go to the thread where I posted
> originally posted it.
> http://tinyurl.com/cfe5ltq
> Don't compromise your PC by using cracks found on the web. Use my
> genuine, fully-paid for key.

I don't think so as this was one of the scrambled ones.

Oh and there are a few copies of Agent out there as there are Oxygen phone manager that
will wipe the OS system on your mobiles and computers.

[Derek]

On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 18:04:09 +0100, steven...@bigfoot.com wrote:

>On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 17:13:45 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 00:50:49 -0500, Biff Pow Boom <Bi...@Pow.Com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >A while back, someone shared their forte 6 reg key. Does anyone remember what it
>> >was?
>>
>> UYK3KWEU-W1JA333J-S72G5C9G-SVN3UNAU-83AUZLWU-Y8JZEB4X
>> VHVJFYBL-4HXHTZXE-BW24V71B-WT4B3ERL-HJY5PE2R-9BPSC8K5
>> TJZ9ZLV2-6LDF1RHW
>>
>> And to check that it's a genuine key, go to the thread where I

>> originally posted it.
>> http://tinyurl.com/cfe5ltq
>> Don't compromise your PC by using cracks found on the web. Use my
>> genuine, fully-paid for key.
>
>
>I don't think so

Go to the link and see the email I received from Forte after
registering. It's a genuine key that I purchased by upgrading from
ver. 5.

[steven...@bigfoot.com]

On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 18:17:14 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 18:04:09 +0100, steven...@bigfoot.com wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 17:13:45 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 00:50:49 -0500, Biff Pow Boom <Bi...@Pow.Com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >A while back, someone shared their forte 6 reg key. Does anyone remember what it
> >> >was?
> >>

> >> UYK3KWEU-W1JA333F-S72G5C9G-SVN3UNAU-83AUZLWU-Y8JZEB4X
> >> VHVJFYBL-4HXHTZXE-BW24V71B-WT4B3ERL-HJY6PE2R-9BPSC9K5
> >> TJZ9ZLV2-6LDF1HHW

> >>
> >> And to check that it's a genuine key, go to the thread where I
> >> originally posted it.

> >> http://tinyurl.com/cfe5ltg

> >> Don't compromise your PC by using cracks found on the web. Use my
> >> genuine, fully-paid for key.
> >
> >
> >I don't think so
>
> Go to the link and see the email I received from Forte after
> registering. It's a genuine key that I purchased by upgrading from
> ver. 5.

Just for the sake of an argument can you tell me and everyone else WHY you want Forte to
go out of business and make a number of people unemployed and stop the development of
Agent.

Just an honest question and I would like an honest answer please.

[Derek]

Go to the link I provided to find it. They've abandoned their
customers. There won't BE another version. I've paid for upgrades for
10 years or so, and they took my money and ran.

[Nick Spalding]

Derek wrote, in <en11o79g9hmbi90nu...@4ax.com>
on Sat, 07 Apr 2012 19:29:31 +0100:

Wrong again.
--
Nick Spalding
IE8, Vista Home Premium SP2, 32 bit, Intel Viiv dual core
E6300 (1.86Ghz, 1066MHz FSB), 2GB RAM, 320GB NTFS HD,
Video Nvidia GeForce 7900GS LCD 1024x768x75Hz

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 05:21:10 +0000, Ian Anderson
<an...@127.0.0.1.invalid> wrote:

>On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 19:29:31 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com>
>wrote:

>
>>Go to the link I provided to find it. They've abandoned their
>>customers. There won't BE another version. I've paid for upgrades for
>>10 years or so, and they took my money and ran.
>

>Derek, you and I seem to be using "Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186" but if you
>look at a few headers before you leap next time, you will find that some
>others seem to be using a later Agent version. <g,d&r>

No, I'm using the latest release. I've always used the latest release.
Forte's web site says, "If you upgrade today, you will also receive a
free upgrade to Agent 7.0 when it becomes available.", but there won't
BE a version 7.0. They only promise future upgrades to persuade their
customers to part with their cash. Version 6 was released in November
2009.

[G. Morgan]

steven...@bigfoot.com wrote:

>Just for the sake of an argument can you tell me and everyone else WHY you want Forte to
>go out of business and make a number of people unemployed and stop the development of
>Agent.

I don't think anyone is working on Agent. There was lots of "buzz"
leading to the release of v6, but there is not a glimmer of rumor
v7 is coming.

Does their support email address still get a reply?

Does anyone know for sure if development has stopped altogether?



--
Every book is a children's book if the kid can read! -Mitch Hedberg

[steven...@bigfoot.com]

Really - so you never look at the headers then to see what version people are using?

If you really are that clever then hit "H" and have a look and if you can read and see
what I am talking about then stop fucking things up.

[h...@h-gee.co.uk]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 02:21:44 -0500, G. Morgan <seal...@osama-is-dead.net> wrote:

> steven...@bigfoot.com wrote:
>
> >Just for the sake of an argument can you tell me and everyone else WHY you want Forte to
> >go out of business and make a number of people unemployed and stop the development of
> >Agent.
>
> I don't think anyone is working on Agent. There was lots of "buzz"
> leading to the release of v6, but there is not a glimmer of rumor
> v7 is coming.
>
> Does their support email address still get a reply?
>
> Does anyone know for sure if development has stopped altogether?

As Nick said wrong again just look at the full header list by using the H key on the
keyboard to see what version is being used to post to this group.

Hugh of Bognor

--
I used to be an Egotistical Megalomaniac - but now I'm just perfect!

Hugh Gundersen
h...@h-gee.co.uk

Bognor Regis, W.Sussex, England, UK

[Derek]

Yes, really. Go to http://www.forteinc.com/release/index.php and see
that only version 6 is available, the same version that's been
available since November 2009.

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 11:48:11 +0100, h...@h-gee.co.uk wrote:

>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 02:21:44 -0500, G. Morgan <seal...@osama-is-dead.net> wrote:
>
>> steven...@bigfoot.com wrote:
>>
>> >Just for the sake of an argument can you tell me and everyone else WHY you want Forte to
>> >go out of business and make a number of people unemployed and stop the development of
>> >Agent.
>>
>> I don't think anyone is working on Agent. There was lots of "buzz"
>> leading to the release of v6, but there is not a glimmer of rumor
>> v7 is coming.
>>
>> Does their support email address still get a reply?
>>
>> Does anyone know for sure if development has stopped altogether?
>
>
>As Nick said wrong again just look at the full header list by using the H key on the
>keyboard to see what version is being used to post to this group.

Go to http://www.forteinc.com/release/index.php and see that only ver.

6 is available, the same version that's been available since November

2009. And besides, I would still give out my registration key for
version 6 even if version 28 was available. You don't like it, but
that's just tough.

[Metspitzer]

So what is new? The version number?

[Luca]

Derek:

> >As Nick said wrong again just look at the full header list by using the H key on the
> >keyboard to see what version is being used to post to this group.
>
> Go to http://www.forteinc.com/release/index.php and see that only ver.
> 6 is available,

Ok, now you go here:
http://www.google.it/search?num=100&hl=en&q=%22forte+agent+7.00%22

> And besides, I would still give out my registration key for
> version 6 even if version 28 was available.

Fine. So you won't regret it when you won't be able to upgrade using your key.

--
Luca - e-mail: p.stevens at linuxfan.it

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 08:01:56 -0500, Biff Pow Boom <Bi...@Pow.Com>
wrote:

>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 12:10:00 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>Go to http://www.forteinc.com/release/index.php and see that only ver.
>>6 is available, the same version that's been available since November
>>2009. And besides, I would still give out my registration key for
>>version 6 even if version 28 was available. You don't like it, but
>>that's just tough.
>

>Your key is good for future Forte' releases?

No, only for the current and last release.

>How do it know?

It doesn't. Forte, unlike T-Bird, doesn't 'phone home' every time it
starts up.

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 14:04:27 +0200, Luca <lu...@no.spam.invalid> wrote:

>Derek:
>
>> >As Nick said wrong again just look at the full header list by using the H key on the
>> >keyboard to see what version is being used to post to this group.
>>
>> Go to http://www.forteinc.com/release/index.php and see that only ver.
>> 6 is available,
>
>Ok, now you go here:
>http://www.google.it/search?num=100&hl=en&q=%22forte+agent+7.00%22

And where is the information in that link about this alleged version 7
release?

>> And besides, I would still give out my registration key for
>> version 6 even if version 28 was available.
>
>Fine. So you won't regret it when you won't be able to upgrade using your key.

There won't BE an upgrade. So no, I won't be regretting anything.

[Mekman]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:09:09 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>There won't BE an upgrade. So no, I won't be regretting anything.
>

Take it easy, Derek. Even If you strongly believe in something, it
doesn't make it necessarily true.

[Derek]

Hey, I was just thinking the same thing about all those who believe
there'll be future releases.

[Nick Spalding]

Biff Pow Boom wrote, in <4043o7d1co99q68b1...@4ax.com>
on Sun, 08 Apr 2012 08:25:35 -0500:

>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 11:46:07 +0100, steven...@bigfoot.com wrote:
>
>
>>

>>If you really are that clever then hit "H" and have a look and if you can read and see
>>what I am talking about then stop fucking things up.
>

>Forte's site offers no Rev 7
>How did you get your post to show Forte Agent 7.00/32.1196?
>
>Do you work for Forte?
>
>This site shows several posts by a version Forte Agent 7.00/32.1196
>
>http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/spoolstats/agents.html
>
>How do it know?

If you ask nicely in auorfa.modified someone may tell you how to modify
the X-Newsreader.

[Luca]

Derek:

> On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 14:04:27 +0200, Luca <lu...@no.spam.invalid> wrote:
>
> >Derek:
> >
> >> >As Nick said wrong again just look at the full header list by using the H key on the
> >> >keyboard to see what version is being used to post to this group.
> >>
> >> Go to http://www.forteinc.com/release/index.php and see that only ver.
> >> 6 is available,
> >
> >Ok, now you go here:
> >http://www.google.it/search?num=100&hl=en&q=%22forte+agent+7.00%22
>
> And where is the information in that link about this alleged version 7
> release?

Oh, please...
http://www.newsadmin.com/readerbrandsbytesdetail.asp?reader=Forte+date=20120406
Read the line #15.

[Stephen Wolstenholme]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:06:30 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com>

There are other ways to check keys.

Steve

--
Neural Network Software. http://www.npsl1.com
EasyNN-plus. Neural Networks plus. http://www.easynn.com
SwingNN. Forecast with Neural Networks. http://www.swingnn.com
JustNN. Just Neural Networks. http://www.justnn.com

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 08:42:25 -0500, Biff Pow Boom <Bi...@Pow.Com>
wrote:

>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:31:23 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Hey, I was just thinking the same thing about all those who believe
>>there'll be future releases.
>

>Bigfoot and Ralph apparently work or run Forte, as there posts reflect
>a version 7.

Ahh, but are they really using a newer release or have they modified
the headers somehow, hoping you and I believe something that isn't
true. I can modify them to a certain extent, too. Check the headers in
this post to see my message ID.

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 14:39:37 +0200, Luca <lu...@no.spam.invalid> wrote:

>Derek:
>
>> On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 14:04:27 +0200, Luca <lu...@no.spam.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> >Derek:
>> >
>> >> >As Nick said wrong again just look at the full header list by using the H key on the
>> >> >keyboard to see what version is being used to post to this group.
>> >>
>> >> Go to http://www.forteinc.com/release/index.php and see that only ver.
>> >> 6 is available,
>> >
>> >Ok, now you go here:
>> >http://www.google.it/search?num=100&hl=en&q=%22forte+agent+7.00%22
>>
>> And where is the information in that link about this alleged version 7
>> release?
>
>Oh, please...
>http://www.newsadmin.com/readerbrandsbytesdetail.asp?reader=Forte+date=20120406
>Read the line #15.

I still don't see the availability of version 7 there. Try directing
me to a page where I can download a genuine copy of ver. 7.
Otherwise, just keep pretending you're using it by munging the
headers.

[G. Morgan]

h...@h-gee.co.uk wrote:

>As Nick said wrong again just look at the full header list by using the H key on the
>keyboard to see what version is being used to post to this group.

I always display headers. How did you fake yours?

--
I recently took up ice sculpting. Last night I made an ice cube.
This morning I made 12, I was prolific. -Mitch Hedberg

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 14:02:55 +0100, Stephen Wolstenholme
<st...@npsl1.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:06:30 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 08:01:56 -0500, Biff Pow Boom <Bi...@Pow.Com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 12:10:00 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Go to http://www.forteinc.com/release/index.php and see that only ver.
>>>>6 is available, the same version that's been available since November
>>>>2009. And besides, I would still give out my registration key for
>>>>version 6 even if version 28 was available. You don't like it, but
>>>>that's just tough.
>>>
>>>Your key is good for future Forte' releases?
>>
>>No, only for the current and last release.
>>
>>>How do it know?
>>
>>It doesn't. Forte, unlike T-Bird, doesn't 'phone home' every time it
>>starts up.
>
>There are other ways to check keys.

Good grief! And?

[s|b]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 14:13:06 +0100, Derek wrote:

> Ahh, but are they really using a newer release or have they modified
> the headers somehow, hoping you and I believe something that isn't
> true. I can modify them to a certain extent, too.

So modify the X-Newsreader header then!

> Check the headers in
> this post to see my message ID.

Changing your message-id is easy...

--
s|b

[s|b]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 14:17:42 +0100, Derek wrote:

> I still don't see the availability of version 7 there. Try directing
> me to a page where I can download a genuine copy of ver. 7.
> Otherwise, just keep pretending you're using it by munging the
> headers.

You're not very bright, are you?

--
s|b

[Jaimie Vandenbergh]

[Default] On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 09:12:22 -0500, G. Morgan

<seal...@osama-is-dead.net> wrote:

>h...@h-gee.co.uk wrote:
>
>>As Nick said wrong again just look at the full header list by using the H key on the
>>keyboard to see what version is being used to post to this group.
>
>I always display headers. How did you fake yours?

Fake?

Cheers - Jaimie
--
"Dawn is a beautiful way to end an evening. It's a lousy way
to start a day." - Dominic Flandry

[s|b]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 09:12:22 -0500, G. Morgan wrote:

> >As Nick said wrong again just look at the full header list by using the H key on the
> >keyboard to see what version is being used to post to this group.

> I always display headers. How did you fake yours?

Probably the same way you faked yours?

--
s|b

[Stephen Wolstenholme]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 15:35:29 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com>

wrote:

>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 14:02:55 +0100, Stephen Wolstenholme
><st...@npsl1.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:06:30 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 08:01:56 -0500, Biff Pow Boom <Bi...@Pow.Com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 12:10:00 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Go to http://www.forteinc.com/release/index.php and see that only ver.
>>>>>6 is available, the same version that's been available since November
>>>>>2009. And besides, I would still give out my registration key for
>>>>>version 6 even if version 28 was available. You don't like it, but
>>>>>that's just tough.
>>>>
>>>>Your key is good for future Forte' releases?
>>>
>>>No, only for the current and last release.
>>>
>>>>How do it know?
>>>
>>>It doesn't. Forte, unlike T-Bird, doesn't 'phone home' every time it
>>>starts up.
>>
>>There are other ways to check keys.
>
>Good grief! And?

I use a method in my software that does not depend on being able to
'phone home'. It is obvious to anyone who buys it but I won't be
explaining it on a Usenet group.

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 16:47:10 +0200, "s|b" <m...@privacy.invalid> wrote:

>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 14:13:06 +0100, Derek wrote:
>
>> Ahh, but are they really using a newer release or have they modified
>> the headers somehow, hoping you and I believe something that isn't
>> true. I can modify them to a certain extent, too.
>
>So modify the X-Newsreader header then!

I need hex editor to modify the .exe file, and I don't have one on me
at the moment. However, should the urge to lie and fool people into
believing a lie become too great to resist, I find one and edit the
file.

>> Check the headers in
>> this post to see my message ID.
>
>Changing your message-id is easy...

And honest.

[Derek]

Then, will you show how clever you are by directing me to a place
where I can download a genuine copy of Agent 7? Thanks in advance.

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 15:55:13 +0100, Stephen Wolstenholme

Whoa! Better not.

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 08:46:22 -0500, Biff Pow Boom <Bi...@Pow.Com>
wrote:

>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:39:15 +0100, Nick Spalding <spal...@iol.ie> wrote:
>
>
>>>
>>>How do it know?
>>
>>If you ask nicely in auorfa.modified someone may tell you how to modify
>>the X-Newsreader.
>
>

>Knew that. Just seeing if anyone here would offer it.
>
>So there is no Agent 7 then?

No, only the promise of one along with a request that you part with
your cash in the hope of getting it cheaper by upgrading to the
current one, and that's just plain dishonesty on Forte's part.

Forte's web site says, "If you upgrade today, you will also receive a
free upgrade to Agent 7.0 when it becomes available.", but there won't
BE a version 7.0. They only promise future upgrades to persuade their
customers to part with their cash. Version 6 was released in November
2009.

Their dishonesty, and the dishonesty of Forte's shills here on this
newsgroup who munge their headers in an effort to dupe readers into
believing there is or will be future releases, allows me to publish my
serial key with a clean conscience.

[Mekman]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 17:00:33 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>Their dishonesty, and the dishonesty of Forte's shills here on this
>newsgroup who munge their headers in an effort to dupe readers into
>believing there is or will be future releases, allows me to publish my
>serial key with a clean conscience.

Yes, it's clear, Several known members of Agent beta team decided to
modify their Agent's headers at the same time just to mislead potential
customers. You really are one clever boy to notice that, Derek!

[s|b]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 19:35:31 +0300, Mekman wrote:

> >Their dishonesty, and the dishonesty of Forte's shills here on this
> >newsgroup who munge their headers in an effort to dupe readers into
> >believing there is or will be future releases, allows me to publish my
> >serial key with a clean conscience.

> Yes, it's clear, Several known members of Agent beta team decided to
> modify their Agent's headers at the same time just to mislead potential
> customers. You really are one clever boy to notice that, Derek!

Good for him he's wearing a tin foil hat so he won't be affected by the
evil vibes of Forté's agents...

--
s|b

[s|b]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 16:01:43 +0100, Derek wrote:

> >So modify the X-Newsreader header then!

> I need hex editor to modify the .exe file, and I don't have one on me
> at the moment. However, should the urge to lie and fool people into
> believing a lie become too great to resist, I find one and edit the
> file.

Here's one:

<http://mh-nexus.de/en/downloads.php?product=HxD>

You don't even have to install it; there's a portable version available.
Go ahead, change the X-Newsreader header to 8.0!

> >> Check the headers in
> >> this post to see my message ID.

> >Changing your message-id is easy...

> And honest.

Honest? In your case it's plain wrong because "Derek" isn't a domain
name.

<http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc850.html>

| In order to conform to RFC 822, the Message-ID must have
| the format
|
| "<" "unique" "@" "full domain name" ">"
|
| where "full domain name" is the full name of the host at
| which the article entered the network, including a domain
| that host is in, and unique is any string of printing
| ASCII characters, not including "<", ">", or "@".

I changed my message-id because I think 4ax.com is wrong according to
this RFC. Now the newsserver I use generates the message-id.
Unfortunately, Eternal September uses 'dont-email.me' as domain, which
is wrong as well. But there are servers who respect this RFC...

--
s|b

[phe...@bethere.co.uk]

You can't unless you are one of a privileged few that test to see if we can exterminate
people that give out operational keys. We are getting very close but that part of the code
isn't quite perfect yet, sadly.......

[steven...@bigfoot.com]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 08:25:35 -0500, Biff Pow Boom <Bi...@Pow.Com> wrote:

> On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 11:46:07 +0100, steven...@bigfoot.com wrote:
>
>
> >
> >If you really are that clever then hit "H" and have a look and if you can read and see
> >what I am talking about then stop fucking things up.
>
> Forte's site offers no Rev 7
> How did you get your post to show Forte Agent 7.00/32.1196?
>
> Do you work for Forte?
>
> This site shows several posts by a version Forte Agent 7.00/32.1196
>
> http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/spoolstats/agents.html
>
> How do it know?

Sorry to say that I am sworn to secrecy as are many people here.

The golden rule is "ENGAGE BRAIN BEFORE OPENING MOUTH" or a smack in the mouth often
offends.

I now expect Forte to alter all serial codes for v7 and not to issue one to you. After all
you have enabled the theft of several hundred or maybe thousands of copies of Agent v6.
Perhaps Forte should send you the bill for a nominal 1000 copies of Agent v6.

[h...@h-gee.co.uk]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 08:46:22 -0500, Biff Pow Boom <Bi...@Pow.Com> wrote:

> On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:39:15 +0100, Nick Spalding <spal...@iol.ie> wrote:
>
>
> >>

> >>How do it know?
> >
> >If you ask nicely in auorfa.modified someone may tell you how to modify
> >the X-Newsreader.
>
>

> Knew that. Just seeing if anyone here would offer it.
>
> So there is no Agent 7 then?

No to you yet
Hugh of Bognor

--
I used to be an Egotistical Megalomaniac - but now I'm just perfect!

Hugh Gundersen
h...@h-gee.co.uk

Bognor Regis, W.Sussex, England, UK

[h...@h-gee.co.uk]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 09:12:22 -0500, G. Morgan <seal...@osama-is-dead.net> wrote:

> h...@h-gee.co.uk wrote:
>
> >As Nick said wrong again just look at the full header list by using the H key on the
> >keyboard to see what version is being used to post to this group.
>
> I always display headers. How did you fake yours?

Not faked

[steven...@bigfoot.com]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 16:47:47 +0200, "s|b" <m...@privacy.invalid> wrote:

As with all new program releases there are testers out here that have the job of using the
program to excess to uncover any faults that may have occurred in the recoding process.

[h...@h-gee.co.uk]

www.forteinc.com in about 2 months time

[Metspitzer]

It would give a little encouragement if anyone with V 7 could give one
example of what it does that V 6 doesn't.

I bet it does not include a horizontal scroll bar or any other way to
see more of the subject line without having to open the message.

A hover balloon would be nice for those of us with bad eye site.

[h...@h-gee.co.uk]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 19:35:31 +0300, mek...@spamex.com (Mekman) wrote:

Big job wasn't it my friend I expect to progress to v9 in the next few weeks and by August
v11 or v12 to get in line with other releases of software that use the date to enhance
upgrades and increase revenue like M$ do and most of the game software publishers.

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 19:35:31 +0300, mek...@spamex.com (Mekman) wrote:

Nick Spalding, a long-time knowledgeable participant here, concedes
that some of the posters here, have modified their headers to dupe
readers into believing version 7 is being used for whatever reason.

"If you ask nicely in auorfa.modified someone may tell you how
to modify the X-Newsreader."

So stop lying.

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 19:04:24 +0200, "s|b" <m...@privacy.invalid> wrote:

>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 16:01:43 +0100, Derek wrote:
>
>> >So modify the X-Newsreader header then!
>
>> I need hex editor to modify the .exe file, and I don't have one on me
>> at the moment. However, should the urge to lie and fool people into

>> believing a lie become too great to resist, I'll find one and edit the

>> file.
>
>Here's one:
>
><http://mh-nexus.de/en/downloads.php?product=HxD>
>
>You don't even have to install it; there's a portable version available.
>Go ahead, change the X-Newsreader header to 8.0!

Are you trying to imply that it can and is being done, or that it
can't and isn't?

>> >> Check the headers in
>> >> this post to see my message ID.
>
>> >Changing your message-id is easy...
>
>> And honest.
>
>Honest?

Yes, unlike those who change theirs to give the impression they're
using a newer version of Agent that doesn't really exist.

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 18:15:49 +0100, h...@h-gee.co.uk wrote:

>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 16:04:12 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 16:47:47 +0200, "s|b" <m...@privacy.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> >On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 14:17:42 +0100, Derek wrote:
>> >
>> >> I still don't see the availability of version 7 there. Try directing
>> >> me to a page where I can download a genuine copy of ver. 7.
>> >> Otherwise, just keep pretending you're using it by munging the
>> >> headers.
>> >
>> >You're not very bright, are you?
>>
>> Then, will you show how clever you are by directing me to a place
>> where I can download a genuine copy of Agent 7? Thanks in advance.
>
>www.forteinc.com in about 2 months time

So it doesn't exist yet and probably never will. Thanks for confirming
the lie I've seen in some of the headers I've seen today, Hughie.

>
>Hugh of Bognor

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 18:06:59 +0100, phe...@bethere.co.uk wrote:

>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 14:17:42 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 14:39:37 +0200, Luca <lu...@no.spam.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> >Derek:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 14:04:27 +0200, Luca <lu...@no.spam.invalid> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Derek:
>> >> >
>> >> >> >As Nick said wrong again just look at the full header list by using the H key on the
>> >> >> >keyboard to see what version is being used to post to this group.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Go to http://www.forteinc.com/release/index.php and see that only ver.
>> >> >> 6 is available,
>> >> >
>> >> >Ok, now you go here:
>> >> >http://www.google.it/search?num=100&hl=en&q=%22forte+agent+7.00%22
>> >>
>> >> And where is the information in that link about this alleged version 7
>> >> release?
>> >
>> >Oh, please...
>> >http://www.newsadmin.com/readerbrandsbytesdetail.asp?reader=Forte+date=20120406
>> >Read the line #15.
>>
>> I still don't see the availability of version 7 there. Try directing
>> me to a page where I can download a genuine copy of ver. 7.
>> Otherwise, just keep pretending you're using it by munging the
>> headers.
>
>You can't

... because it doesn't exist and never will. Thanks for confirming
that.

[Jaimie Vandenbergh]

[Default] On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 18:35:51 +0100, Derek

It's interesting that you seize on that ambiguous statement from Nick,
completely ignoring his totally unambiguous "Wrong again".

What exactly will you do if Forte do release Agent 7?

Cheers - Jaimie
--
Thank you for your input. Now, if you have something substantive to
bring to the discussion, kindly do. Otherwise, isn't there an
eternal flamefest that would peter out if you won't keep feeding it?
-- Cosmin Corbea, r.a.b

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 18:57:14 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh
<jai...@sometimes.sessile.org> wrote:

>[Default] On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 18:35:51 +0100, Derek
><usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 19:35:31 +0300, mek...@spamex.com (Mekman) wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 17:00:33 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Their dishonesty, and the dishonesty of Forte's shills here on this
>>>>newsgroup who munge their headers in an effort to dupe readers into
>>>>believing there is or will be future releases, allows me to publish my
>>>>serial key with a clean conscience.
>>>
>>>Yes, it's clear, Several known members of Agent beta team decided to
>>>modify their Agent's headers at the same time just to mislead potential
>>>customers. You really are one clever boy to notice that, Derek!
>>
>>Nick Spalding, a long-time knowledgeable participant here, concedes
>>that some of the posters here, have modified their headers to dupe
>>readers into believing version 7 is being used for whatever reason.
>>
>> "If you ask nicely in auorfa.modified someone may tell you how
>> to modify the X-Newsreader."
>>
>>So stop lying.
>
>It's interesting that you seize on that ambiguous statement from Nick,
>completely ignoring his totally unambiguous "Wrong again".

There was no further comment after his statement, let alone "Wrong
again." Go up the thread and have a look.

>What exactly will you do if Forte do release Agent 7?

I'll stick with my present version.

[Jaimie Vandenbergh]

[Default] On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 19:03:26 +0100, Derek

I refer you to
Message-ID: <4n91o7ds109beknms...@4ax.com>

>>What exactly will you do if Forte do release Agent 7?
>
>I'll stick with my present version.

With a clean conscience? Referring to your quoted first paragraph in
this post.

Cheers - Jaimie
--
We're the technical experts. We were hired so that management could
ignore our recommendations and tell us how to do our jobs.
-- Mike Andrews

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 19:07:47 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh

That's a different statement in a different post to the one I was
referring to. You knew that. It's patently clear that version 6 is the
latest and last release, and that the posters who seem to be posting
from a newer version are modifying the "X-Newsreader" part in their
headers to give the impression they're using a newer version.

>>>What exactly will you do if Forte do release Agent 7?
>>
>>I'll stick with my present version.
>
>With a clean conscience?

Yes, of course.

[Jaimie Vandenbergh]

[Default] On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 19:20:12 +0100, Derek

Indeed I did, which is why I gave a messageID so you could find it and
see that Nick thinks you are completely wrong about Forte not
releasing a new version.

You respected his opinion when you thought it matched yours, but not
when it says otherwise.

>It's patently clear that version 6 is the
>latest and last release, and that the posters who seem to be posting
>from a newer version are modifying the "X-Newsreader" part in their
>headers to give the impression they're using a newer version.

For what reason is this "patently clear"?

>>>>What exactly will you do if Forte do release Agent 7?
>>>
>>>I'll stick with my present version.
>>
>>With a clean conscience?
>
>Yes, of course.

"of course"? You give away license keys and encourage others to use
them to steal software for the specific reason that you believe there
will be no later versions; then a later version appears, and "of
course" you have a clean conscience? I boggle.

It's lucky this is merely about software and money, or I'd have to
consider of you as actively amoral rather than merely ethically
challenged.

Cheers - Jaimie
--
The advantage of a bad memory is that one can enjoy the
same good things for the first time several times. -- Nietzsche

[s|b]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 18:42:09 +0100, Derek wrote:

8< snip - need hex editor to manipulate X-Newsreader >8

> >Here's one:
> >
> ><http://mh-nexus.de/en/downloads.php?product=HxD>
> >
> >You don't even have to install it; there's a portable version available.
> >Go ahead, change the X-Newsreader header to 8.0!

> Are you trying to imply that it can and is being done, or that it
> can't and isn't?

I don't know if it can be done. I know I can't do it.

8< snip - faulty message-id >8

> >Honest?

> Yes, unlike those who change theirs to give the impression they're
> using a newer version of Agent that doesn't really exist.

You're either very stupid or you're just a troll. In any case, I'm
creating a kill filter for you. Bye!

--
s|b

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:11:09 +0200, "s|b" <m...@privacy.invalid> wrote:

>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 18:42:09 +0100, Derek wrote:
>
>8< snip - need hex editor to manipulate X-Newsreader >8
>> >Here's one:
>> >
>> ><http://mh-nexus.de/en/downloads.php?product=HxD>
>> >
>> >You don't even have to install it; there's a portable version available.
>> >Go ahead, change the X-Newsreader header to 8.0!
>
>> Are you trying to imply that it can and is being done, or that it
>> can't and isn't?
>
>I don't know if it can be done. I know I can't do it.

Don't lie. Of course you can. I can. Check my headers in this post.
Wow, I'm using version 8!

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 20:05:49 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh

I know that. He knew how easy it is to change the headers by editing
the .exe file, I knew, and so did you, so stop lying. Check my
headers. Good grief - version 8 is here already!

[Jaimie Vandenbergh]

[Default] On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 20:44:47 +0100, Derek

<usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:

>I know that. He knew how easy it is to change the headers by editing
>the .exe file, I knew, and so did you, so stop lying. Check my
>headers. Good grief - version 8 is here already!

Poor dodging, little one.

Cheers - Jaimie
--
For every rational explanation there are uncountably many irrational ones
-- Staples' Observation

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 20:45:38 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh
<jai...@sometimes.sessile.org> wrote:

>[Default] On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 20:44:47 +0100, Derek
><usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>I know that. He knew how easy it is to change the headers by editing
>>the .exe file, I knew, and so did you, so stop lying. Check my
>>headers. Good grief - version 8 is here already!
>
>Poor dodging, little one.

Check my headers again. Version 9 is here now in the space of just a
few minutes. Wow! Agent are pulling out all the stops for their
customers today.

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 20:32:20 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com>

Shit! Those geniuses at Forte Agent have just released another
version. I'm using version 9 now.

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 15:49:02 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh
<jai...@sometimes.sessile.org> wrote:

>[Default] On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 09:12:22 -0500, G. Morgan
><seal...@osama-is-dead.net> wrote:

>
>>h...@h-gee.co.uk wrote:
>>
>>>As Nick said wrong again just look at the full header list by using the H key on the
>>>keyboard to see what version is being used to post to this group.
>>

>>I always display headers. How did you fake yours?
>

>Fake?

Yes, fake, so stop lying. I'm using version 9 now. Check my headers.

[Nick Spalding]

Derek wrote, in <0hk3o7h146gf84i8esj3t3k2eglffqe4mr@Derek>
on Sun, 08 Apr 2012 19:03:26 +0100:

>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 18:57:14 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh
><jai...@sometimes.sessile.org> wrote:
>
>>[Default] On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 18:35:51 +0100, Derek
>><usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 19:35:31 +0300, mek...@spamex.com (Mekman) wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 17:00:33 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Their dishonesty, and the dishonesty of Forte's shills here on this
>>>>>newsgroup who munge their headers in an effort to dupe readers into
>>>>>believing there is or will be future releases, allows me to publish my
>>>>>serial key with a clean conscience.
>>>>
>>>>Yes, it's clear, Several known members of Agent beta team decided to
>>>>modify their Agent's headers at the same time just to mislead potential
>>>>customers. You really are one clever boy to notice that, Derek!
>>>
>>>Nick Spalding, a long-time knowledgeable participant here, concedes
>>>that some of the posters here, have modified their headers to dupe
>>>readers into believing version 7 is being used for whatever reason.

That was simply to mislead arseholes like you.

>>> "If you ask nicely in auorfa.modified someone may tell you how
>>> to modify the X-Newsreader."
>>>
>>>So stop lying.
>>
>>It's interesting that you seize on that ambiguous statement from Nick,
>>completely ignoring his totally unambiguous "Wrong again".
>
>There was no further comment after his statement, let alone "Wrong
>again." Go up the thread and have a look.
>
>>What exactly will you do if Forte do release Agent 7?
>
>I'll stick with my present version.

--
Nick Spalding
IE8, Vista Home Premium SP2, 32 bit, Intel Viiv dual core
E6300 (1.86Ghz, 1066MHz FSB), 2GB RAM, 320GB NTFS HD,
Video Nvidia GeForce 7900GS LCD 1024x768x75Hz

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 18:12:08 +0100, h...@h-gee.co.uk wrote:

>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 09:12:22 -0500, G. Morgan <seal...@osama-is-dead.net> wrote:
>
>> h...@h-gee.co.uk wrote:
>>
>> >As Nick said wrong again just look at the full header list by using the H key on the
>> >keyboard to see what version is being used to post to this group.
>>
>> I always display headers. How did you fake yours?
>
>Not faked

It's a fake, little lying Hughie. Check my headers to see that I've
faked mine.

[Nick Spalding]

Derek wrote, in <4ks3o75qqj9abgrligar5nsjp50aemd769@Derek>
on Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:19:33 +0100:

The fact that you did doesn't mean that I did.

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:18:45 +0100, Nick Spalding <spal...@iol.ie>
wrote:

>Derek wrote, in <0hk3o7h146gf84i8esj3t3k2eglffqe4mr@Derek>
> on Sun, 08 Apr 2012 19:03:26 +0100:
>
>>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 18:57:14 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh
>><jai...@sometimes.sessile.org> wrote:
>>
>>>[Default] On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 18:35:51 +0100, Derek
>>><usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 19:35:31 +0300, mek...@spamex.com (Mekman) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 17:00:33 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Their dishonesty, and the dishonesty of Forte's shills here on this
>>>>>>newsgroup who munge their headers in an effort to dupe readers into
>>>>>>believing there is or will be future releases, allows me to publish my
>>>>>>serial key with a clean conscience.
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, it's clear, Several known members of Agent beta team decided to
>>>>>modify their Agent's headers at the same time just to mislead potential
>>>>>customers. You really are one clever boy to notice that, Derek!
>>>>
>>>>Nick Spalding, a long-time knowledgeable participant here, concedes

>>>>that some of the posters here have modified their headers to dupe

>>>>readers into believing version 7 is being used for whatever reason.
>
>That was simply to mislead arseholes like you.

Then you're a self-confessed deliberate liar, Nickie. Like I said
above, "Their dishonesty, and the dishonesty of Forte's shills here
[including Nickie] on this newsgroup who munge their headers in an

effort to dupe readers into believing there is or will be future
releases, allows me to publish my serial key with a clean conscience."

Check my headers to see what version Agent has given me to test for
them.

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:21:46 +0100, Nick Spalding <spal...@iol.ie>
wrote:

>Derek wrote, in <4ks3o75qqj9abgrligar5nsjp50aemd769@Derek>
> on Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:19:33 +0100:
>
>>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 18:12:08 +0100, h...@h-gee.co.uk wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 09:12:22 -0500, G. Morgan <seal...@osama-is-dead.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> h...@h-gee.co.uk wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >As Nick said wrong again just look at the full header list by using the H key on the
>>>> >keyboard to see what version is being used to post to this group.
>>>>
>>>> I always display headers. How did you fake yours?
>>>
>>>Not faked
>>
>>It's a fake, little lying Hughie. Check my headers to see that I've
>>faked mine.
>
>The fact that you did doesn't mean that I did.

It shows that it can be done, even though all you shills here
pretended it couldn't and hadn't, so I've every reason to believe
you're still lying about future releases of Agent. Nice try, but not
everyone on Usenet is as stupid as you think they are, Nickie.

[Luca]

Derek:

> Check my headers again. Version 9 is here now in the space of just a
> few minutes.

But you're still using the same build :-)

--
Luca - e-mail: p.stevens at linuxfan.it

[Nick Spalding]

Derek wrote, in <1os3o7hq71i5v5geirh9p5hangjaoh8prm@Derek>
on Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:25:46 +0100:

What I said was that auorfam would assist in modifying the X-Newsreader,
not that that was what I had done.

[Jaimie Vandenbergh]

[Default] On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:17:08 +0100, Derek

I have never faked a Usenet header.

Cheers - Jaimie
--
"For our younger readers - books are hardened
bits of the internet that have fallen off."
-- http://www.e4.com/wtf/ispot-games/?sheet=28

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:36:10 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh

<jai...@sometimes.sessile.org> wrote:

>[Default] On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:17:08 +0100, Derek
><usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 15:49:02 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh
>><jai...@sometimes.sessile.org> wrote:
>>
>>>[Default] On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 09:12:22 -0500, G. Morgan
>>><seal...@osama-is-dead.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>h...@h-gee.co.uk wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>As Nick said wrong again just look at the full header list by using the H key on the
>>>>>keyboard to see what version is being used to post to this group.
>>>>
>>>>I always display headers. How did you fake yours?
>>>
>>>Fake?
>>
>>Yes, fake, so stop lying. I'm using version 9 now. Check my headers.
>
>I have never faked a Usenet header.

Agent 7 isn't available, and it isn't being tested for release, so
don't try to lie yourself off the hook with that garbage. You
unethically faked your headers to give the impression version 7 was
released or about to be released, and when caught out you tried to lie
your way off the hook. Poor effort.

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 22:32:51 +0200, Luca <lu...@no.spam.invalid> wrote:

>Derek:
>
>> Check my headers again. Version 9 is here now in the space of just a
>> few minutes.
>
>But you're still using the same build :-)

Are you sure about that? ;-)

[Luca]

Derek:

> It shows that it can be done, even though all you shills here
> pretended it couldn't and hadn't, so I've every reason to believe
> you're still lying about future releases of Agent.

> Nice try, but not
> everyone on Usenet is as stupid as you think they are, Nickie.

You're right, somebody seems even more stupid. C'mon, give it up. You made
twice a mistake: bad choice and worst timing, right now that a new version is
in the oven. Now don't do a third one, this denial is ridiculous.

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:35:04 +0100, Nick Spalding <spal...@iol.ie>

I don't believe you because you've lied and lied again on this issue.
Your headers say you're using version 7 while only version 6 is
available. You've deliberately edited your .exe file to modify the
headers to give readers here the impression version 7 was being tested
for release, knowing full well that version 6 is the latest and last
release. You lied, and you admitted it. Why didn't you tell the truth?

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 22:53:55 +0200, Luca <lu...@no.spam.invalid> wrote:

>Derek:
>
>> It shows that it can be done, even though all you shills here
>> pretended it couldn't and hadn't, so I've every reason to believe
>> you're still lying about future releases of Agent.
>
>> Nice try, but not
>> everyone on Usenet is as stupid as you think they are, Nickie.
>
>You're right, somebody seems even more stupid.

Agreed.

[Jaimie Vandenbergh]

[Default] On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:40:44 +0100, Derek

<usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:36:10 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh
><jai...@sometimes.sessile.org> wrote:
>
>>[Default] On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:17:08 +0100, Derek
>><usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 15:49:02 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh
>>><jai...@sometimes.sessile.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>[Default] On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 09:12:22 -0500, G. Morgan
>>>><seal...@osama-is-dead.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>h...@h-gee.co.uk wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>As Nick said wrong again just look at the full header list by using the H key on the
>>>>>>keyboard to see what version is being used to post to this group.
>>>>>
>>>>>I always display headers. How did you fake yours?
>>>>
>>>>Fake?
>>>
>>>Yes, fake, so stop lying. I'm using version 9 now. Check my headers.
>>
>>I have never faked a Usenet header.
>
>Agent 7 isn't available, and it isn't being tested for release, so
>don't try to lie yourself off the hook with that garbage. You
>unethically faked your headers to give the impression version 7 was
>released or about to be released, and when caught out you tried to lie
>your way off the hook. Poor effort.

I have not lied here, and I have never faked Usenet headers.
Specifically, I have never faked an Agent version.

You are frothing like a loon. Stop it.

Cheers - Jaimie
--
"Some people think that noise abatement should be a higher priority
for ATC. I say safety is noise abatement. You have no idea how much
noise it makes to have a 737 fall out of the sky after an accident."
-- anonymous air traffic controller

[Jaimie Vandenbergh]

[Default] On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:49:42 +0100, Derek

Yes, quite sure.

Cheers - Jaimie
--
Once I drove so fast that my friend, who was pregnant, started having
Lorentz contractions.

"Ahah," you might ask, "but how far apart were they?" - Adam Fineman, rgrn

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 22:11:55 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh

Then explain your headers that indicate a newer version of Agent is
being used to post your messages. And then tell me why I ought to
believe a word you say on this issue when it's patently obvious you
lied by pretending the version number couldn't be changed by modifying
the .exe file with a hex editor, like I've done several times today to
show your dishonesty.

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 22:15:19 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh
<jai...@sometimes.sessile.org> wrote:

>[Default] On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:49:42 +0100, Derek
><usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 22:32:51 +0200, Luca <lu...@no.spam.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>Derek:
>>>
>>>> Check my headers again. Version 9 is here now in the space of just a
>>>> few minutes.
>>>
>>>But you're still using the same build :-)
>>
>>Are you sure about that? ;-)
>
>Yes, quite sure.

No, you're not. Check my headers to see that I've used a hex editor to
modify the version and build.

"X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 9.00/32.9999"

Would you like me to change anything else?

[h...@h-gee.co.uk]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:17:44 -0400, Metspitzer <Kilo...@charter.net> wrote:

> On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 19:35:31 +0300, mek...@spamex.com (Mekman) wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 17:00:33 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>Their dishonesty, and the dishonesty of Forte's shills here on this
> >>newsgroup who munge their headers in an effort to dupe readers into
> >>believing there is or will be future releases, allows me to publish my
> >>serial key with a clean conscience.
> >
> >Yes, it's clear, Several known members of Agent beta team decided to
> >modify their Agent's headers at the same time just to mislead potential
> >customers. You really are one clever boy to notice that, Derek!
> >
> >

> It would give a little encouragement if anyone with V 7 could give one
> example of what it does that V 6 doesn't.
>
> I bet it does not include a horizontal scroll bar or any other way to
> see more of the subject line without having to open the message.
>
> A hover balloon would be nice for those of us with bad eye site.

Full HTML posting appears to be a big want and more memory for storage but then we shall
have to wait and see.

Hugh of Bognor

--
I used to be an Egotistical Megalomaniac - but now I'm just perfect!

Hugh Gundersen
h...@h-gee.co.uk

Bognor Regis, W.Sussex, England, UK

[Jaimie Vandenbergh]

[Default] On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 22:23:39 +0100, Derek

<usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 22:15:19 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh
><jai...@sometimes.sessile.org> wrote:
>
>>[Default] On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:49:42 +0100, Derek
>><usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 22:32:51 +0200, Luca <lu...@no.spam.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Derek:
>>>>
>>>>> Check my headers again. Version 9 is here now in the space of just a
>>>>> few minutes.
>>>>
>>>>But you're still using the same build :-)
>>>
>>>Are you sure about that? ;-)
>>
>>Yes, quite sure.
>
>No, you're not. Check my headers to see that I've used a hex editor to
>modify the version and build.
>
> "X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 9.00/32.9999"
>
>Would you like me to change anything else?

I'm quite sure you're using Agent 6.00/32.1186, no matter what your
headers say.

Cheers - Jaimie
--
Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra and then suddenly it
flips over, pinning you underneath. At night, the ice weasels come.
- Nietzsche (via Groening)

[Jaimie Vandenbergh]

[Default] On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 22:20:42 +0100, Derek

I'm under a non-disclosure agreement, so cannot talk about it. I would
expect everyone else here with that version of Agent is also under
NDA.

>And then tell me why I ought to
>believe a word you say on this issue when it's patently obvious you
>lied by pretending the version number couldn't be changed by modifying
>the .exe file with a hex editor, like I've done several times today to
>show your dishonesty.

I pretended no such thing, and your statement speaks poorly of your
reading comprehension.

I said *I* have never faked my headers. I have been aware for well
over a decade that it's possible to do so - hex-editing the raw binary
is a very simple thing.

You are still frothing like a loon. Also, I do not like being accused
of lying - but fortunately I don't consider you worth being offended
by.

Cheers - Jaimie
--
To every complex problem there is a solution which is simple, neat and wrong.
-- HL Mencken

[h...@h-gee.co.uk]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 18:44:44 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 18:15:49 +0100, h...@h-gee.co.uk wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 16:04:12 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 16:47:47 +0200, "s|b" <m...@privacy.invalid> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 14:17:42 +0100, Derek wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I still don't see the availability of version 7 there. Try directing
> >> >> me to a page where I can download a genuine copy of ver. 7.
> >> >> Otherwise, just keep pretending you're using it by munging the
> >> >> headers.
> >> >
> >> >You're not very bright, are you?
> >>
> >> Then, will you show how clever you are by directing me to a place
> >> where I can download a genuine copy of Agent 7? Thanks in advance.
> >
> >www.forteinc.com in about 2 months time
>
> So it doesn't exist yet and probably never will. Thanks for confirming
> the lie I've seen in some of the headers I've seen today, Hughie.
>
> >
> >Hugh of Bognor


I am a beta tester for AVG software and I am using a version that cannot be bought yet but
does that mean that I am lying or the software doesn't exist yet?

It exists because I am using the BETA version of AVG Internet Security it doesn't exist
for mainstream punters that would like to buy it as I can honestly say there are a few
problems such as the "Personal Identity" section is not always enabled when AVG loads and
sometimes needs a kick and the Firewall is a bit sluggish to load at times especially when
it's fighting for resources against some of M$ stuff that wants to load.

So believe what you want to believe as the Catholics, Muslims, Jews and Other mainstream
religions do but hey, don't say people are lying or dismiss what may be real without real
proof.

[Derek]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 22:28:34 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh

<jai...@sometimes.sessile.org> wrote:

>[Default] On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 22:23:39 +0100, Derek
><usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 22:15:19 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh
>><jai...@sometimes.sessile.org> wrote:
>>
>>>[Default] On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:49:42 +0100, Derek
>>><usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 22:32:51 +0200, Luca <lu...@no.spam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Derek:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Check my headers again. Version 9 is here now in the space of just a
>>>>>> few minutes.
>>>>>
>>>>>But you're still using the same build :-)
>>>>
>>>>Are you sure about that? ;-)
>>>
>>>Yes, quite sure.
>>
>>No, you're not. Check my headers to see that I've used a hex editor to
>>modify the version and build.
>>
>> "X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 9.00/32.9999"
>>
>>Would you like me to change anything else?
>
>I'm quite sure you're using Agent 6.00/32.1186, no matter what your
>headers say.

Nope, I'm definitely using version 9.00/32.9999 as you can see by my
headers. Like you and several others here, I'm beta-testing a newer
version of Agent before it becomes available for general release in a
couple-o-months. So upgrade now to version 6 and get a free upgrade to
version 9 for free while you can! Don't waste a minute. Buy it now and
don't miss out!

[h...@h-gee.co.uk]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 19:03:26 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 18:57:14 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh
> <jai...@sometimes.sessile.org> wrote:
>
> >[Default] On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 18:35:51 +0100, Derek

> ><usenet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 19:35:31 +0300, mek...@spamex.com (Mekman) wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 17:00:33 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com>
> >>>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>Their dishonesty, and the dishonesty of Forte's shills here on this
> >>>>newsgroup who munge their headers in an effort to dupe readers into
> >>>>believing there is or will be future releases, allows me to publish my
> >>>>serial key with a clean conscience.
> >>>
> >>>Yes, it's clear, Several known members of Agent beta team decided to
> >>>modify their Agent's headers at the same time just to mislead potential
> >>>customers. You really are one clever boy to notice that, Derek!
> >>

> >>Nick Spalding, a long-time knowledgeable participant here, concedes

> >>that some of the posters here, have modified their headers to dupe

> >>readers into believing version 7 is being used for whatever reason.
> >>

> >> "If you ask nicely in auorfa.modified someone may tell you how
> >> to modify the X-Newsreader."
> >>
> >>So stop lying.
> >
> >It's interesting that you seize on that ambiguous statement from Nick,
> >completely ignoring his totally unambiguous "Wrong again".
>
> There was no further comment after his statement, let alone "Wrong
> again." Go up the thread and have a look.
>
> >What exactly will you do if Forte do release Agent 7?
>
> I'll stick with my present version.

Perhaps you'll have no option??????

[Ken Blake]

On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 18:46:15 +0100, Derek <usenet...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 18:06:59 +0100, phe...@bethere.co.uk wrote:

> >> I still don't see the availability of version 7 there. Try directing
> >> me to a page where I can download a genuine copy of ver. 7.
> >> Otherwise, just keep pretending you're using it by munging the
> >> headers.
> >

> >You can't
>
> ... because it doesn't exist and never will.



Right, it doesn't exist. But how can you be so sure that it never
will? Even if Forté has no intent of producing it now, isn't it always
possible that situations can change and they can change their minds.
Or that some other company buys Forté and the new company wants to
produce a new version?

Bear in mind that I'm not really disagreeing with what you say. I
don't think it ever will either. I just think your statement is too
strong.

--
Ken Blake