On 2015-07-21, John F. Eldredge <
jo...@jfeldredge.com> wrote:
> After some years of donating blood to the Red Cross on a regular basis, I
> was removed permanently from the donor list when I mentioned that I had
> once had jaundice for a week, as a result of accidental pesticide
> poisoning as a six-year-old. The Red Cross's explanation was "Just
> because you were confirmed to have pesticide poisoning, it doesn't prove
> you didn't have hepatitis at the same time, even though you test negative
> for ever having been exposed to hepatitis". I pointed out to them that
> screening out everyone who tests negative for hepatitis, as well as
> everyone who tests positive for it, would leave them with no possible
> donors, but to no avail.
Oh joy.
I opted out of blood donation after my last donation (many years ago
now) - the nurse managed to put the needle THROUGH the vein. That led
to a MASSIVE haematoma that took a few weeks to heal up properly.
(Can't remember exactly, but I'm certain it was more than five cm
long. Very impressive sight, it was.)
I appreciate the need for blood, I really do, but when the staff can't
get a basic part of the job done properly, I'm just not prepared to
risk my health in the process. It's a pity, too, since I'm O negative.