In article <
87mw8t8...@bibi.depot.rail.eu.org>,
Erwan David <
er...@rail.eu.org> wrote:
>I once thought that providing reading courses to recruiters could be a
>career path. Then I considered it would be too depressing.
I don't think the incentive structures for recruiters would make that
a worthwhile endeavor.
The problem is that recruiters are generally invoked by corporate HR
people, not the actual hiring manager, and so their reward system
inventivizes "activity" (bringing in lots of resumes) rather than
utility (finding the one perfect candidate). HR doesn't care whether
you find the person you want or not; they just want to make sure that
the proper formalities are observed, one of which is making sure that
you have a large pool of applicants from as broad a selection of
backgrounds as possible, because that helps the company to defend
against discrimination complaints. Whether those people are actually
useful (or indeed interested in the actual job you're hiring for) is
not really their concern.
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | What intellectual phenomenon can be older, or more oft
wol...@bimajority.org| repeated, than the story of a large research program
Opinions not shared by| that impaled itself upon a false central assumption
my employers. | accepted by all practitioners? - S.J. Gould, 1993