The computer that just failed was about to go into semi-retirement and be
replaced by a new Dell. Now, who knows?
Does anybody have advice that might be useful in this situation?
This situation stinks.
Bernie
I agree with WSZsr on this one. Sounds like a software problem of some
sort.
Maybe try Settings / Printers, then check Properties for the printer in
question. Heck, it could be drivers or any number of things. I'm guessing
some setting or other got bungled, and this isn't Dell's problem.
"Christopher Muto" <mu...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:388F97D2...@worldnet.att.net...
Bernard
Frederick Reynolds wrote in message ...
"Bernard Mushinsky" <ber...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:86o1u0$s0q$1...@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net...
Some more info:
The computer/printer combination had been working without any sign of
trouble since last spring some time, when I bought the printer.
The printer is an HP 6P.
I tried to copy autoexec.bat to the printer via DOS and it goes on to the
next line. The printer sees something because a green light blinks and then
stays lit, but no printing takes place. Under Windows, an error panel pops
up saying that Windows cannot access the port.
I use Win98. At the lower right corner of the screen, there's a little
printer icon in the status bar. It has turned red. Moving the cursor to
that icon results in the pop-up legend "HP Laserjet 6P (LPT1)-Printer
Error."
I re-installed the printer driver just after the first failure.
Looked at properties. Everything seems normal.
Bernard
Bearhair wrote in message ...
> I get quick responses using the e-mail support form on the Dell page.
Kathy
Bernard Mushinsky <ber...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:86pi65$atm$1...@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net...
From what you've described, information is leaving your computer and
travelling toward the printer. You've eliminated the printer because it
works on another machine. You've eliminated the computer because
information is travelling to the printer.
This leaves, IMHO, two possibilities: 1) bad printer cable or 2) incorrect
BIOS configuration for the printer port. If you go into the BIOS setup, how
is the parallel port setup? Is it setup for Bidirectional, EPP, ECP, or
Auto? I don't know what the HP 6P requires, but I know that my HP 2100 will
not work if the port is set to EPP. Works fine as Bidirectional or ECP.
I changed the printer cable, but have not checked the BIOS or run the Dell
diags.
According to Norton, the driver is V 4.0 and it's a resident Win98 driver.
I just installed it the other day from the Win98 CD.
Norton reports that the data type is EMF. I don't know what that means.
I really do appreciate the help you're all providing.
Bernie
Fearless wrote in message ...
Kathy
Bernard Mushinsky <ber...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:86qan1$7h8$1...@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net...
Another way you could do the same type of test is to type 'dir > lpt1' while
inside a directly (preferebly a directory with a lot of files so it prints
more then one page). And, as before, from a DOS only bootup. If the
printjob is not more then one page, the printer may not finish the page
until you press a button or something because it isn't reading a end of
printjob message.
It doesn't seem likely that it could cause you to not get any functionality
at all, but stranger things have happened.
"Bernard Mushinsky" <ber...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
Some comments that may be relevant:
The cable is the same one that I've been using for years.
I have two printers: the HP 6P and a Canon 4100 that happens to be part of
an all-in-one device (fax, copier, printer, scanner).
Yesterday I tried the Canon printer with both of my computers: the Dell and
a Toshiba laptop. The Dell prints gibberish, as it does with the HP; the
Toshiba works as it should. I'm becoming more and more convinced that
something is wrong in my Dell. That Dell cannot be reached is a real
bummer.
Bernard
Bernard Mushinsky wrote in message
<86o1u0$s0q$1...@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net>...
"Bernard Mushinsky" <ber...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in
message news:86sohh$c51$1...@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net...
:
: Yesterday I tried the Canon printer with both of my
computers: the Dell and
: a Toshiba laptop. The Dell prints gibberish, as it does
with the HP; the
: Toshiba works as it should.
Presumably you used the identical cable for both printers
and both computers?
: I'm becoming more and more convinced that
: something is wrong in my Dell.
I agree, but you still haven't ruled out software problems
or BIOS configuration problems. Boot to DOS. At the C:
prompt, type the following (with either printer connected):
dir *.* >lpt:
If the printer prints the root directory contents of your C:
drive, there is nothing wrong with the port; it is a Windows
printer configuration problem or resource conflict. If it
doesn't, get into the BIOS setup and check to see how your
printer port is configured (as I explained in my earlier
message). Don't change anything. Simply report your
results back here.
In all my years of owning personal computers, I've never
encounter one that had a frank failure in the parallel port.
But, the good news is that after you've tried all these
various tests, you'll be confident when you finally get
through to Dell (trying calling late at night) that you'll
get the problem taken care of.
HTH
Good luck.
>Subject: Re: Dell Technical "Support"
>From: "Bernard Mushinsky" ber...@worldnet.att.net
>Date: 1/27/00 5:47 AM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <86pi65$atm$1...@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net>
>>>>> > LPT1 seems to have failed on my computer. I connected the printer to
>>>>> > another computer and it works fine. Yesterday and today, I tried to
>>>get
>>>>> > through to Dell technical support via phone in order to arrange for
>the
>>>>> > repair. I was on hold for about 40 minutes each time, and then
>Dell's
>>>>> > system advised me that they couldn't "process" (their word) my call
>any
>>>>> > longer and that I should call another time. For what? Will it be
>>>>possible
>>>>> > to get through another time?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The computer that just failed was about to go into semi-retirement
>and
>>>>be
>>>>> > replaced by a new Dell. Now, who knows?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Does anybody have advice that might be useful in this situation?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > This situation stinks.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Bernie
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>
David Farber
David Farber's Service Center
L.A., CA
"Bernard Mushinsky" <ber...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:J24n4.1638$gH.5...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Surprise!
>
> I downloaded the Dell diagnostic and then called Dell and, after about 30
> minutes on hold, I managed to get through. The technician tried about a
> dozen things; I then suggested we run the diagnostic. It immediately
> reported an error associated with the parallel port. The run-around
stopped
> at that moment; Dell shipped a mother board overnight (the parallel port
is
> in the mother board). I installed it and everything is now fine.
>
> Bernard
>
I downloaded the Dell diagnostic and then called Dell and, after about 30
minutes on hold, I managed to get through. The technician tried about a
dozen things; I then suggested we run the diagnostic. It immediately
reported an error associated with the parallel port. The run-around stopped
at that moment; Dell shipped a mother board overnight (the parallel port is
in the mother board). I installed it and everything is now fine.
Bernard
Fearless wrote in message ...
>
>
>"Bernard Mushinsky" <ber...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in
>get the problem taken care of.
>
>HTH
>
>