Go home Paedophile protector
Mozzer
humiliation, abuse and death of thousands of innocent people.
You are a disgrace to humanity and deserve to be jailed.
Lawrence Jenkins
"Mozzer" <mozzer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:i6sv1t$fmr$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
> Your homophobic, sexist and anti-condom policies have led to the
> humiliation, abuse and death of thousands of innocent people.
>
> You are a disgrace to humanity and deserve to be jailed.
>
>
Mozzer are you saying that men who desire sex with boys is exclusive to the
catholic church? You do realise that you called the Catholic Church
Homophobic and yet there seem to be legions of shirtlifting boy molesters
within that same organisation. I'd hardly call that homophobic. I mean men
who have a desire for bumming young lads don't seem to see the Cathaolic
Church as homophobic as they are seemingly 'lovin' it there.
Mozzer
Lawrence you seem to be implying that Homosexuality and Paedophilia are
the same thing?
I hope not.
Justin Thyme
>>
>
> Lawrence you seem to be implying that Homosexuality and Paedophilia are
> the same thing?
>
> I hope not.
It's the kind of thing someone like Lawrence would do.
Lawrence Jenkins
"Justin Thyme" <h...@lo.com> wrote in message
news:i6tqn9$ifv$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
That is a bit naughty Mozzer. Can I ask a question? Okay all those priests
and members of the catholic church who carried out sexual abuse of young
boys -not girls, were nuns right?
Kanza Phelix
So, let me get this straight, your argument is:
"how can the catholic church be homophobic, if so many of their number
like raping young boys?"
I have to say, that's a bold statement to use IN DEFENCE OF THE CHURCH,
Lawrence. I look forward to seeing how this thread unfolds. I have a
good feeling about it.
Mozzer
I am sure there has been a number of Nuns molesting young girls as well,
and also priests molesting young girls. The same as outside the
catcholic church. People who do this are paedophiles and have nothing to
do with homosexuality. Homosexuals will be appalled at this evil as will
all members of society.
To try to equate homosexuality with paedohilia is appalling, and
ironically is something the catholic church always tries to imply:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/apr/13/vatican-homosexuality-paedophilia-claim-condemned
hence my original post.
Swerve
>
> hence my original post.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Lawrence, you've really dropped a bollock here dude. Seriously.
Pope Pompous XVIII
Mozzer <mozzer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> I am sure there has been a number of Nuns molesting young girls as
> well, and also priests molesting young girls. The same as outside the
> catcholic church. People who do this are paedophiles and have nothing
> to do with homosexuality. Homosexuals will be appalled at this evil
> as will all members of society.
"The positive nature of some child-adult sexual relationships is not
confined to non-Western cultures. Several of my friends – gay and
straight, male and female – had sex with adults from the ages of nine
to 13. None feel they were abused. All say it was their conscious
choice and gave them great joy.
"While it may be impossible to condone paedophilia, it is time society
acknowledged the truth that not all sex involving children is unwanted,
abusive and harmful."
Peter Tatchell, letter to The Guardian, June 26, 1997, cited in article
by Peter Hitchens, MailOnline, 13 September 2010.
--
+ His Holiness Pope Pompous XVIII
Swerve
<popepompousxv...@popesnews.invalid> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:11:06 +0100
>
A Tatchell shaped straw man
you'll need to do better than that, Pope.
johnty
>
> Lawrence, you've really dropped a bollock here dude. Seriously.
Nothing new there, then
Lawrence Jenkins
"Kanza Phelix" <123...@quninston.com> wrote in message
news:i6u71e$7hq$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
Lawrence Jenkins
"Kanza Phelix" <123...@quninston.com> wrote in message
news:i6u71e$7hq$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
Sorry everyone I've oviously got hold of the wrong end of the stick, The boy
bottom brigade with within the catholic church are a combination of nuns and
hetrosexual men?
Ah, I think I've got it now.
Lawrence Jenkins
If you rely on the self hating looney middle class left at the guardian for
references then you must be desperate.
So you are saying the sexual abuse was carried out purely by hetro sexuals
who just happened to like boys.
LOL
Lawrence Jenkins
Ermm.... isn't that homosexual behaviour as well?
Mozzer
The majority of peadophole behaviour in society is by men on young
girls, as opposed to men with boys or woman with girls.
It would be as ridiculous to say therefore that hetrosexualism equates
to peadophoia so why would you equate a minority activity with it?
Someone who has sex with a child is a peadophile their sexual
orientation has nothing to do with it.
Mozzer
So whats your point? I am sure I could find enough quotes from
hetrosexual men who think it fine to have sex with young girls.
Doesn't mean hetrosexism therefore equates to phaedophilia.
Your leader is a bigot and a scum bag.
Mozzer
preference is male or female.
You cann't just say that of their preference is for young boys therefore
homosexuality equates to paedophile. What about the majority of attacks
by hetrosexuals on young girls?
Lawrence Jenkins
I've never said anywhere that a paedophilia equates to homosexuality -have
I? How ridiculous would that be FFS it would mean I've never heard of Roy
Whiting, Black and Huntley plus many others who no doubt I've queried here
at some time the fact the tax payer keeps them alive; so behave Mozzer you
know that.
The point I made was that you stated that the Catholic church was was anti
homosexual yet its obvious that many homosexuals gravited there over the
centuries to have access to young boys. so it "homophobia" couldn't have
been that bad.
Lawrence Jenkins
Mozzer I defy you to show anywhere that I've said that. That is a downright
distortion and you know it, So stop playing the pathetic your'e anti gay PC
card FFS.
By the way as a hetrosexual I totally disagree your right on statement that
"The majority of peadophole behaviour in society is by men on young girls, "
.
That is a blanket outrageous statement but I guess because it's aimed at
hetrosexuals it doesn't matter. However please show evidence to support that
statement.
Karl
So Pope, are you pro or anti paedophilia?
As i think i've said here before, that while any paedophilia is
abhorrent, what makes these cases worse is the fact that the catholic
church (and the pope) hold themselves up as a moral authority whilst
covering up child abuse and allowing the perpetrators to remain priests
and offend again.
I just had to post this again, kinda spells it out really:
http://podblack.com/2010/04/little-kitten-tim-minchins-pope-song/
Baldoni
You are the scumbag Mozzer you filthy trolling piece of shit.
--
Count Baldoni
Lawrence Jenkins
> Your homophobic, sexist and anti-condom policies have led to the
> humiliation, abuse and death of thousands of innocent people.
>
> You are a disgrace to humanity and deserve to be jailed.
>
>
One more thing Mozzer: the title of your post is
"Go Home Paedophile Protector"
That's a hell of a way to run homophobia.
johnty
>
> I've never said anywhere that a paedophilia equates to homosexuality -have
> I?
You said it in your first reply to mozzer.
I have never seen anyone miss the point so spectacularly as you - not
just here, but all the time.
Lawrence13
Johnty you idiot.,the title of the thread says it all, you melon
Oh by the way, tell me Johnty whilst you're here: What do you do to
help save the planet?
Twat
johnty
> On Sep 18, 11:28 am, johnty <john...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I have never seen anyone miss the point so spectacularly as you - not
> > just here, but all the time.
>
> Johnty you idiot.,the title of the thread says it all, you melon
eh?
>
> Oh by the way, tell me Johnty whilst you're here: What do you do to
> help save the planet?
I do lots of things
>
> Twat
Is this your new sig? Very apt.
Lawrence Jenkins
"johnty" <joh...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a26e9ca2-2c63-493a...@q9g2000vbd.googlegroups.com...
eh?
>
> Twat
Solar or wind...now let me guess.
LOL
Lawrence Jenkins
The point or irony was in the title and post.
The catholic church full of homosexual boy molesters and that's the truth of
it and then accusing that same Catholic Church of that pathetic term
'homophobia'. Doesn't seem very consistent, does it.
Have you tried heat pumps not the plimsolls though lol.
Pope Pompous XVIII
So justice in Britain is still the same is it? After all these years
you're still finding people guilty of crimes without a shred of
evidence, based solely on satisfying the public's thirst for blood,
something the British media are all too happy to do wherever
Catholicism is concerned?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgUWn0gVpq0
johnty
<popepompousxv...@popesnews.invalid> wrote:
>
> So justice in Britain is still the same is it? After all these years
> you're still finding people guilty of crimes without a shred of
> evidence, based solely on satisfying the public's thirst for blood,
Got any examples?
Pope Pompous XVIII
Yes I have.
johnty
<popepompousxv...@popesnews.invalid> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > On 21 Sep, 18:39, Pope Pompous XVIII
> > <popepompousxv...@popesnews.invalid> wrote:
>
> > > So justice in Britain is still the same is it? After all these years
> > > you're still finding people guilty of crimes without a shred of
> > > evidence, based solely on satisfying the public's thirst for blood,
>
> > Got any examples?
>
> Yes I have.
>
Go on, just one. Or are you scared of having your arse kicked yet
again?
Pope Pompous XVIII
Jean Charles de Menezes.
That enough for you?
Fuckwit.
Pakistan Cricket Scam
Colin Stagg's trial by media. Barry George's trial by media.
You want any more?
--
"Entire units of the Metropolitan Police and the Flying Squad and the
drug squad were Freemasons. They all, in the end, were sent to prison.
When you are bonded by an oath of mutual defence and loyalty, you may
well find that it is extremely difficult to squeal on your corrupt brethren"
Martin Short on BBC Newsnight 19/03/01
JAB
The strange thing is Pope is British ...
Pope Pompous XVIII
The strange thing is that not a single one of you sneers has offered a
single shred of evidence that the Pope deliberately protected
paedophile priests against prosecution.
So I guess it's much easier for you, bereft as you are of ideas, to
start sneering instead. Or do as Swerve did - reply with yet another
sneering post to avoid having to address the Tatchell post I sent in
response to Mozzer.
JAB
>> The strange thing is Pope is British ...
>
> The strange thing is that not a single one of you sneers has offered a
> single shred of evidence that the Pope deliberately protected
> paedophile priests against prosecution.
>
> So I guess it's much easier for you, bereft as you are of ideas, to
> start sneering instead. Or do as Swerve did - reply with yet another
> sneering post to avoid having to address the Tatchell post I sent in
> response to Mozzer.
>
What's that got to do with the fact that you're British but pretend to
be Irish Pope?
Pope Pompous XVIII
You fucked off pretty quickly, didn't you johnty.
And there you were telling everybody I was the one to run away.
Sweet.
JAB
> You fucked off pretty quickly, didn't you johnty.
>
> And there you were telling everybody I was the one to run away.
>
> Sweet.
>
Pope you still haven't answered my question about why you pretend to be
Irish when you are if fact British ...
johnty
He wasn't "found guilty". Re-read what you wrote, moron
johnty
> johnty wrote:
> > On 23 Sep, 00:23, Pope Pompous XVIII
> > <popepompousxv...@popesnews.invalid> wrote:
>
> >>On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
>
> >>johnty <john...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>On 21 Sep, 18:39, Pope Pompous XVIII
> >>><popepompousxv...@popesnews.invalid> wrote:
>
> >>>>So justice in Britain is still the same is it? After all these years
> >>>>you're still finding people guilty of crimes without a shred of
> >>>>evidence, based solely on satisfying the public's thirst for blood,
>
> >>>Got any examples?
>
> >>Yes I have.
>
> > Go on, just one. Or are you scared of having your arse kicked yet
> > again?
>
> Colin Stagg's trial by media. Barry George's trial by media.
>
> You want any more?
>
Stagg was found not guilty. Not quite the same as guilty, is it?
There was some evidence in George, despite the unsound conviction, so
not quite the "without a shred of evidence" claimed.
Baldoni
Stefan Kiszko
Convicted of the (sexual) murder of a young girl in 1976, Stefan Kiszko
spent 16 years in prison until he was released in 1992. He died of a
heart attack the followng year at his mother's home aged 44; his
mother, who had waged a long campaign to prove her son's innocence,
died six months later.
Stefan Kiszko suffered from XYY syndrome, a condition in which the
human male has an extra Y chromosome. Such males are normal except for
- sometimes slight - growth abnormalities and minor behavioural
abnormalities. (Another victim of a miscarriage of justice supported by
Innocent also has this condition - Howard Hughes). One of Stefan
Kiszko's "behavioural abnormalities" was jotting down the registration
numbers of a car if he had been annoyed by the driver. This led, in
part, to his wrongful conviction - he had at some point prior to the
murder unwittingly jotted down the number of a car seen near the scene
of the crime. It was argued that only someone at the scene could have
known the number of this car... As part of his condition Stefan Kiszko
would have been physically incapable of the sex crime of which he was
convicted. Something which was never disclosed to his defence...
A book has been written about the case - see below for more details.
http://www.innocent.org.uk/cases/stefankiszko/index.html
--
Count Baldoni
johnty
>
> Stefan Kiszko
>
> Convicted of the (sexual) murder of a young girl in 1976,
A miscarriage certainly, but like the appalling case of JCdM, not
relevant.
However, touching as it is that you and PCS are furiously trying to
dig Pope out of a hole he is incapable of digging himself out of, re-
read his stupid big-mouthed claim, particularly the "..still finding
people guilty" bit.
Pope, being the self-proclaimed English expert that he thinks he is,
will immediately recognise that this called something like the present
continuous tense, so a case from nearly 35 years ago doesn't really
qualify as being very recent...
johnty
<popepompousxv...@popesnews.invalid> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>
> johnty <john...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On 23 Sep, 00:23, Pope Pompous XVIII
> > <popepompousxv...@popesnews.invalid> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > > johnty <john...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On 21 Sep, 18:39, Pope Pompous XVIII
> > > > <popepompousxv...@popesnews.invalid> wrote:
>
> > > > > So justice in Britain is still the same is it? After all these
> > > > > years you're still finding people guilty of crimes without a
> > > > > shred of evidence, based solely on satisfying the public's
> > > > > thirst for blood,
>
> > > > Got any examples?
>
> > > Yes I have.
>
> > Go on, just one. Or are you scared of having your arse kicked yet
> > again?
>
> You fucked off pretty quickly, didn't you johnty.
>
Yoo hoo, I'm over here.
I was distracted by this virtual reality thing where you can actually
interface directly with real people without using a machine. It's
called a life. You should get one.
> And there you were telling everybody I was the one to run away.
Was I? Where, exactly?
johnty
> Was I? Where, exactly?
Hello? Anyone there?
Well, gosh, I do believe Pope has run away...
Again.