Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Trump supporters no different than Nazi Brownshirts..

7 views
Skip to first unread message

Man of Mind

unread,
Nov 13, 2016, 8:03:33 PM11/13/16
to
On 11/13/2016 6:12 PM, Terd wrote:
> Clean Me Up Slutty wrote:
>> On 11/13/2016 04:28 PM, Terd wrote:
>>>
>>> They're like religious fanatics.
>>
>> Far worse....
>
> True.


"Since the election, we've seen a big uptick in incidents of vandalism,
threats, intimidation spurred by the rhetoric surrounding Mr. Trump's
election," Richard Cohen, president of the Southern Poverty Law Center
in Montgomery, Ala., told USA TODAY. "The white supremacists out there
are celebrating his victory and many are feeling their oats," Cohen said.

The incidents, some that bring up memories of the Jim Crow era,
continued into Friday. In Philadelphia, the University of Pennsylvania
issued a statement saying it was working to find the source of racist
messages sent to black freshmen, and in Syracuse, N.Y., a group of
pickup trucks - one draped with the Confederate flag - drove through an
anti-Trump rally. In Columbus, Ohio, a man banged on the car window
while a Muslim woman was driving, her children and elderly parents with
her, and told her, "C--t, you don't belong in this country," according
to the Council on American-Islamic Relations, based in Washington.

All those were added to the list of incidents that included black
children being told to get to the back of a bus and Latino children
being taunted about the wall that Trump promised to build between Mexico
and the United States.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/11/12/post-election-spate-hate-crimes-worse-than-post-911-experts-say/93681294/

--
Republicans often as not create the very problems they say
that they're trying to solve, while blaming the Democratic
Party for what they did..

Dänk 42Ø

unread,
Nov 14, 2016, 12:31:48 AM11/14/16
to
On 11/14/2016 01:03 AM, Man of Mind wrote:

> Subject: Re: Trump supporters no different than Nazi Brownshirts..

Where have I heard a reference to "Brownshirts" before?

Beam Me Up Scotty

unread,
Nov 14, 2016, 2:01:02 AM11/14/16
to
The rioters in Oregon and Baltimore and Texas and everywhere they shot
police....

The Liberal Fascists need their enforcers to stir up trouble and create
crisis. It's how you manipulate the really dumb Democrat voters which
appears to be about 90% of them.

--
That's Karma

Whatever the problem is, ObamaCare wasn't the solution for it.

Topaz

unread,
Nov 14, 2016, 5:48:40 PM11/14/16
to


Hitler
Reichstag, 30th January 1934

"Without the organization of the SA, and the SS... we should all have
fallen victims to the Red Terror... And it is not because of any fear
of blood that we have carried through this Revolution without
bloodshed, but only because of our profound sympathy with those whom
we have always regarded only as misled, seduced by lies."


www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com

Topaz

unread,
Nov 14, 2016, 5:52:41 PM11/14/16
to
Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:

"the problem of how the future of the German nation can be secured is
the problem of how Marxism can be exterminated."

"The largest so-called bourgeois mass meetings were accustomed to
dissolve, and those in attendance would run away like rabbits when
frightened by a dog as soon as a dozen communists appeared on the
scene."

"We used to roar with laughter at these silly faint-hearted bourgeosie
and their efforts to puzzle out our origin, our intentions, and our
aims.
"We chose red for our posters after particular and careful
deliberation, our intention being to irritate the Left, so as to
arouse their attention and tempt them to come to our meetings--if only
to break them up--so that in this way we got a chance of talking to
the people."

"At meetings, particularly outside Munich, we had in those days from
five to eight hundred opponents against fifteen to sixteen National
Socialists; yet we brooked no interference, for we were ready to be
killed rather than capitulate. More than once a handful of party
colleagues offered a heroic resistance to a raging and violent mob of
Reds. Those fifteen or twenty men would certainly have been
overwhelmed in the end had not the opponents known that three or four
times as many of themselves would first get their skulls cracked. And
that was a risk they were not willing to run."

When Hitler marched through the streets with his Storm Troops he
carried a walking stick. The Reds came to oppose them and throw stones
and things, but when it got very bad Hitler would raise the stick.
This was the signal to his men to clear the streets of the Reds. And
soon there was not a Red left to be found.

Dänk 42Ø

unread,
Nov 15, 2016, 12:28:40 PM11/15/16
to
On 11/14/2016 07:00 AM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:
> On 11/14/2016 12:31 AM, Dänk 42Ø wrote:
>> On 11/14/2016 01:03 AM, Man of Mind wrote:
>>
>>> Subject: Re: Trump supporters no different than Nazi Brownshirts..
>>
>> Where have I heard a reference to "Brownshirts" before?
>>
> The rioters in Oregon and Baltimore and Texas and everywhere they shot
> police....
>
> The Liberal Fascists need their enforcers to stir up trouble and create
> crisis. It's how you manipulate the really dumb Democrat voters which
> appears to be about 90% of them.

Actually, I was referring to a certain troll who used the term often
during the B*sh regime. He was (is) pathologically obsessed with the
creature, then after six years of demanding his impeachment (same as
me), found all sorts of excuses for Democraps when they moved
impeachment off the table to make room for a farm subsidy bill (his
own "farm" didn't get any subsidy money, though; it all went to
Monsanto).

As disgusting as American politics are, the Nazi card is inappropriate.
But if they want to play it, I suppose we can compare every liberal
policy to Stalin. He did give the Russians free healthcare, he kept
them safe with his KGB spy program, and he threw around free rubles to
placate the masses.

I play both cards: I liken American politics to the conflict between
Hitler and Stalin. Each had seemingly important ideological difference,
but life in each society was virtually identical. In the end their
respective ideologies could be boiled down to poison gas vs. bullets.

America is not quite that extreme (yet), but we are given a false
"choice" between a Giant Douche or a Turd Sandwich.

Dänk 42Ø

unread,
Nov 15, 2016, 12:30:05 PM11/15/16
to
On 11/14/2016 10:52 PM, Topaz wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 05:31:42 +0000, Dänk 42Ø
> <da...@freetown.christiania.org> wrote:
>
>> On 11/14/2016 01:03 AM, Man of Mind wrote:
>>
>>> Subject: Re: Trump supporters no different than Nazi Brownshirts..
>>
>> Where have I heard a reference to "Brownshirts" before?
>
> Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:

We're talking about metaphorical brownshirts, not real ones.


The Starmaker

unread,
Nov 15, 2016, 1:25:13 PM11/15/16
to
Topaz wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 05:31:42 +0000, Dänk 42Ø
> <da...@freetown.christiania.org> wrote:
>
> >On 11/14/2016 01:03 AM, Man of Mind wrote:
> >
> > > Subject: Re: Trump supporters no different than Nazi Brownshirts..
> >
> >Where have I heard a reference to "Brownshirts" before?
>
> Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:


Here's another quote from Mein Kampf:


"That gentleman [the rector] assured me that the drawings I had submitted incontrovertibly showed my unfitness for painting."





You don't let a guy become the artist he wants to be, who knows what will he become?


He might want some...payback.

Topaz

unread,
Nov 15, 2016, 5:28:34 PM11/15/16
to


Here is excerpt from his memoirs General Leon Degrelle, former
leader of the Belgian contingent of the Waffen-SS:

"One of the first labor reforms to benefit the German workers
was the establishment of annual paid vacation. The Socialist French
Popular Front, in 1936, would make a show of having invented the
concept of paid vacation, and stingily at that, only one week per
year. But Adolf Hitler originated the idea, and two or three times as
generously, from the first month of his coming to power in 1933.

Every factory employee from then on would have the legal right
to a paid vacation. Until then, in Germany paid holidays where they
applied at all did not exceed four or five days, and nearly half the
younger workers had no leave entitlement at all. Hitler, on the other
hand, favored the younger workers. Vacations were not handed out
blindly, and the youngest workers were granted time off more
generously. It was a humane action; a young person has more need of
rest and fresh air for the development of his strength and vigor just
coming into maturity. Basic vacation time was twelve
days, and then from age 25 on it went up to 18 days. After ten years
with the company, workers got 21 days, three times what the French
socialists would grant the workers of their country in 1936.

These figures may have been surpassed in the more than half a
century since then, but in 1933 they far exceeded European norms. As
for overtime hours, they no longer were paid, as they were everywhere
else in Europe at that time, at just the regular hourly rate. The
work day itself had been reduced to a tolerable norm of eight hours,
since the forty-hour week as well, in Europe, was first initiated by
Hitler. And beyond that legal limit, each additional hour had to be
paid at a considerably increased rate...

Dismissal of an employee was no longer left as before the
sole discretion of the employer. In that era, workers' rights to job
security were non-existent. Hitler saw to it that those rights were
strictly spelled out. The employer had to announce any dismissal four
weeks in advance. The employee then had a period of up to two months
in which to lodge a protest. The dismissal could also be annulled by
the Honor of Work Tribunal. What was the Honor of Work Tribunal? Also
called the Tribunal of Social Honor, it was the third of the three
great elements or layers of protection and defense that were to the
benefit of every German worker. The first was the Council
of Trust. The second was the Labor Commission.

The Council of Trust was charged with attending to the
establishment and the development of a real community spirit between
management and labor. In any business enterprise, the Reich law
stated, the employer and head of the enterprise, the employees and
workers, personnel of the enterprise, shall work jointly towards the
goal of the enterprise and the common good of
the nation...

Thus from 1933 on, the German worker had a system of justice
at his disposal that was created especially for him and would
adjudicate all grave infractions of the social duties based on the
idea of the Aryan enterprise community. Examples of these violations
of social honor are cases where the employer, abusing his power,
displayed ill will towards his staff or impugned the honor of his
subordinates, cases where staff members threatened work harmony by
spiteful agitation; the publication by members of the Council of
confidential information regarding the enterprise which they
became cognizant of in the course of discharging their duties.
Thirteen Tribunes of Social Honor were established, corresponding
with the thirteen commissions...

From then on the worker knew that exploitation of his physical
strength in bad faith or offending his honor would no longer be
allowed. He had to fulfill certain obligations to the community, but
they were obligations that applied to all members of the enterprise,
from the chief executive down to the messenger boy. Germany's workers
at last had clearly established social rights that were arbitrated by
a Labor Commission and enforced by a Tribunal of Honor. Although
effected in an atmosphere of justice and moderation, it was a
revolution.

This was only the end of 1933, and already the first effects
could be felt. The factories and shops large and small were reformed
or transformed in conformity with the strictest standards of
cleanliness and hygiene; the interior areas, so often dilapidated,
opened to light; playing fields constructed; rest areas made
available where one could converse at one's ease and relax during
rest periods; employee cafeterias; proper dressing rooms.

With time, that is to say in three years, those achievements
would take on dimensions never before imagined; more than 2,000
factories refitted and beautified; 23,000 work premises modernized;
800 buildings designed exclusively for meetings; 1,200 playing
fields;
13,000 sanitary facilities with running water; 17,000 cafeterias.
Eight hundred departmental inspectors and 17,300 local inspectors
would foster and closely and continuously supervise these renovations
and installations.

The large industrial establishments moreover had been given
the obligation of preparing areas not only suitable for sports
activities of all kinds, but provided with swimming pools as well.
Germany had come a long way from the sinks for washing one's face and
the dead tired workers, grown old before their time, crammed into
squalid courtyards during work breaks.

In order to ensure the natural development of the working
class, physical education courses were instituted for the younger
workers; 8,000 such were organized. Technical training would be
equally emphasized, with the creation of hundreds of work schools,
technical courses and examinations of professional competence, and
competitive examinations for the best workers for which large prizes
were awarded.

To rejuvenate young and old alike, Hitler ordered that a
gigantic vacation organization for workers be set up. Hundreds of
thousands of workers would be able every summer to relax on the
sea. Magnificent cruise ships would be built. Special trains would
carry vacationers to the mountains and to the seashore. The
locomotives that hauled the innumerable worker-tourists in
just a few years of travel in Germany would log a distance equivalent
to fifty-four times around the world!

The cost of these popular excursions was nearly insignificant,
thanks to greatly reduced rates authorized by the Reichsbank.

Didn't these reforms lack something? Were some of them flawed
by errors and blunders? It is possible. But what did a blunder amount
to alongside the immense gains?

That this transformation of the working class smacked of
authoritarianism? That's exactly right. But the German people were
sick and tired of socialism and anarchy. To feel commanded didn't
bother them a bit. In fact, people have always liked having a strong
man guide them. One thing for certain is that the turn of mind of the
working class, which was still almost two-thirds non-Nazi in 1933,
had completely changed.

The Belgian author Marcel Laloire would note: "When you make
your way through the cities of Germany and go into the working-class
districts, go through the factories, the construction yards, you are
astonished to find so many workers on the job sporting the Hitler
insignia, to see so many flags with the Swastika, black on a bright
red background, in the most populous districts." The Labor Front that
Hitler imposed on all of the workers and employers of the Reich was
for the most part received with favor.

And already the steel spades of the sturdy young lads of the
National Labor Service could be seen gleaming along the highways. The
National Labor Service had been created by Hitler out of thin air to
bring together for a few months in absolute equality, and in the same
uniform, both the sons of millionaires and the sons of the poorest
families. All had to perform the same work and were subject to the
same discipline, even the same pleasures and the same physical and
moral development. On the same construction sites and in the same
living quarters, they had become conscious of their commonality, had
come to understand one another, and had swept away their
old prejudices of class and caste. After this hitch in the National
Labor Service they all began to live as comrades, the workers knowing
that the rich man's son was not a monster, and the young lad from the
wealthy family knowing that the worker's son had honor just
like any other young fellow who had been more generously
favored by birth. Social hatred was disappearing, and a socially
united people was being born.

Hitler could already go into factories, something no man of the
so-called Right before him would have risked doing, and hold forth to
the mob of workers, tens of thousands of them at a time, as in the
Siemens works. In contrast to the von Papens and other country
gentlemen, he might tell them, "In my youth I was a worker like you.
And in my heart of hearts, I have remained what I was then." In the
course of his twelve years in power, no incident ever occurred at any
factory Adolf Hitler ever visited. When Hitler was among the people,
he was at home, and he was received like the member of
the family who had been most successful."

Topaz

unread,
Nov 15, 2016, 5:48:50 PM11/15/16
to
On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:29:59 +0000, Dänk 42Ř
<da...@freetown.christiania.org> wrote:

>On 11/14/2016 10:52 PM, Topaz wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 05:31:42 +0000, Dänk 42Ř
>> <da...@freetown.christiania.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/14/2016 01:03 AM, Man of Mind wrote:
>>>
>>>> Subject: Re: Trump supporters no different than Nazi Brownshirts..
>>>
>>> Where have I heard a reference to "Brownshirts" before?
>>
>> Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
>
>We're talking about metaphorical brownshirts, not real ones.
>
That is interesting. But even back in the 1930's it was the commie
types who always started trouble. And the media disses anyone who
fights back or stands up to them.

Man of Mind

unread,
Nov 18, 2016, 3:48:13 PM11/18/16
to
On 11/15/2016 4:39 PM, Faulty Sham aka Slaphead whined/opined:
>
> On 11/13/2016 7:03 PM, Man of Mind wrote:
>>
>> "Since the election, we've seen a big uptick in incidents of vandalism,
>
> Does that include the Soros-hired anti-Trump protesters


You mean the 'anarchists' that were arrested that weren't actually
a part of the peaceful protesting, right? Yeah, you're just parroting
your alt-right media like the loyal alt-right brownshirt you are..


Now, what about all the violent acts you've been supporting?

Topaz

unread,
Nov 18, 2016, 4:50:54 PM11/18/16
to
On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:48:11 -0600, Man of Mind
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:

>The incidents, some that bring up memories of the Jim Crow era,
> continued into Friday. In Philadelphia, the University of Pennsylvania
> issued a statement saying it was working to find the source of racist
> messages sent to black freshmen, and in Syracuse, N.Y., a group of
> pickup trucks - one draped with the Confederate flag - drove through
> an anti-Trump rally. In Columbus, Ohio, a man banged on the car window


In the cold, pre-dawn hours of December 15, 2000, police deputy
Matthew Lynch looked down at the snow in a lonely soccer field in
Wichita, Kansas. The snow was pink, and spotted with red. It was
stained with blood: the blood of the White victims of one of the most
vicious racial attacks in American history -- the attack that has
become known as the Wichita Massacre.

The bodies of four dead White Americans lay in that soccer field, and
there would have been five if not for a near-miracle that allowed one
of the White victims, a 25-year-old schoolteacher we'll call HG, to
survive to tell her story. She ran naked for a mile in 17-degree
weather before she found help, and she refused medical attention (even
though she was suffering from a gunshot wound) until she was sure that
her helpers had heard and understood her story. She said "...Don't
call 911 yet! I want you to hear this story in case I die." You see,
young HG wasn't sure she would live long enough to tell her story
otherwise -- after having been kidnapped, robbed, repeatedly raped,
forced to engage in sex acts, shot execution-style in the back of the
head, and then run over by a truck
and left for dead by her two Black male attackers. That 25-year-old
woman wanted us to know what happened. And thanks to the workings of a
fate which looks a lot like Providence, and to her own endurance and
courage, we do know what happened there. And we must never forget the
Wichita Massacre...

According to HG's testimony (which was subsequently censored)
transcribed at the court TV message board, the Whites were forced to
submit to rape and sodomy from the Blacks and were also forced to rape
each other to put on a kind of "sex show" for the Blacks : "they had
Heather and I come out of the bedroom...and they told us to perform
oral
sex. I did to Heather first and she did that back and then ...he
shouted ...my mouth to her vagina..uh...it would be her mouth to my
vagina... they wanted [us] to... digitally penetrate one another and
we did that." The Blacks then forced Mr. Befort and Mr. Heyka to have
intercourse with HG, and when they were unable or unwilling to perform
as demanded they were mercilessly beat on the head with golf clubs
until they were almost senseless. Neighbors stated that the men's
blood, as a result of these beatings, "was everywhere in the duplex."
HG's testimony continued: "We had sex but he didn't have an
erection... so they were angry...several guys came out...they hit him
on the back of the head and after that I went back into the closet.
...we were under the impression that after they were done they would
probably shoot us. And then they were just screaming, one of them made
er ....a howling sound... they moved so that they could get a better
view... they were angry that he wasn't doing what they had asked him
to do...he didn't do what they
wanted...there was some conversation about an erection....you have
some certain time to get that vagina entered! ...He cried out. if he
didn't have an erection, he would be SHOT...so I was trying to help
Jason..." Later, the Blacks repeatedly raped and sodomized the two
White women, in the words of HG: " at that point in time Brad was gone
...while Brad was gone ...I was pulled out to the wetbar...where he
raped me. ...he had on an orange and black sweater that has FUBU. ...I
was spread on the floor on all fours...with him behind me ...I saw a
silver handgun ...by me as I was down on all fours."...

Three hours after the ordeal began, at 2:07 AM, the Blacks loaded the
men into the trunk and took the five young Whites for their final
ride, the men nude, the women naked from the waist down.

Arriving shortly thereafter at the lonely, snow-covered soccer field,
the Blacks ordered the five Whites to kneel in the snow and then shot
them one by one in the back of the head. HG remembers "As I was
kneeling, a gun shot went off? I heard Aaron . . . I could distinguish
Aaron's voice. He said, 'Please, no sir, please.' The gun went off."

There were three shots and then: "I felt the bullet hit the back of my
head. It went kind of gray with white like stars. I wasn't knocked
unconscious. I didn't fall forward. Then someone kicked me, and I had
fallen forward. I was playing dead. I didn't move. I didn't want them
to shoot me again." The Blacks, thinking the Whites were dead, got
into
Jason Befort's pickup truck and ran over the bodies, including the
living body of HG.

She says: "I waited until I couldn't hear any more, then I turned my
head and saw lights going. I looked at everyone. Everyone was face
down. Jason was next to me. I rolled him over. There was blood
squirting everywhere, so I took my sweater off and tied it around his
head to try and stop it. He had blood coming out of his eyes." The
rest you know.
Everyone except HG was killed, and she is now testifying in the trial
of Jonathan and Reginald Carr.

According to New Nation News, a pro-White alternative Web site, the
autopsy of 25-year-old Heather Muller, the student who was also a
preschool teaching volunteer, indicated new trauma to her hymen,
showing that she had been a virgin at the time of her rape and murder,
belying the statement allegedly made by Reginald Carr "Ever been with
a Black dude before, you bitch?"

Naturally, the defense is trying to confuse the identities of the
brothers: the brother who had a bushy "afro" style now wears
"cornrows," and the brother who had "cornrows" has shaved his head,
and both are now wearing glasses and squinting a great deal.

And the arrogance of these Blacks, who know that the system in this
country will not tolerate Whites expressing even the mildest racial
preference or concern, is almost unbelievable. One Black juror, a
Boeing employee, was being questioned about his feelings toward the
Carrs when he said "I hate to see young Black men go through this."

In a CourtTV forum message, a local woman in Wichita stated:

"I attended the second day of the preliminary hearing, the day after
the surviving victim recounted the horrific ordeal of the Carr
brothers' victims. During a break in the proceedings, several family
members of the Carr brothers left their seats in the back of the
courtroom and sat in the jury box, where they were only a few feet
away from the defendants. All manner of laughing, giggling and making
faces at each other then ensued. It was the most surreal and repugnant
sight I've ever witnessed. When Reginald Carr saw me staring at this
display, he flicked his tongue, obscenely, at me; a gesture I've
experienced several times before when driving by black men on the
street."

And the massacre didn't even begin with the horrors of that night. A
few days earlier, the Carr brothers carjacked a White man, Andrew
Schreiber, and attacked and repeatedly shot Linda Walenta, a cellist
in the Wichita Symphony, as she tried to escape them. She was
paralyzed and suffered for three weeks before finally dying.

From the time of the attacks themselves, through the arrests of the
Carr brothers, the preliminary hearings, the depositions, and now the
trial itself, the Wichita Massacre has received very little national
attention from the Jewish-controlled media, just as we predicted it
would not.

Though these same media outlets shouted from the housetops for years
about the dragging death of a Black man in Texas committed by Whites,
and about the murder of homosexual Matthew Shepard, and even filled
the airwaves with "outrage" over the use of excessive force against
the Black criminal Rodney King, there has been hardly a mention of the
grisly rape-murders of the Wichita Massacre.

Almost all of the coverage has been local Wichita coverage, with even
readers in Kansas City complaining they get little news of the
massacre in their local media. Ingram's, a local magazine, states that
the major media there have given only inside-page notice to the
massacre - with no mentions of the interracial nature of the crimes in
the Kansas City
Star, and that their research revealed that Kansas City media had
given considerably more coverage to the killing of an animal called
"Scruffy the Dog" a few years back than they did to the Carr brothers
and their seven White victims.

Another message, this one from a retired police detective, which was
posted (and then removed) from CourtTV's Internet forum, stated the
media non-coverage issue succinctly:

"As a retired Chicago homicide detective, I have yet to hear of any
more VICIOUS and COLD-BLOODED (5) homicides involving a PERSONAL
CONFRONTATION between victims and STRANGERS than this case which
resulted in ONE HUNDRED HIRTEEN (113) FELONY COUNTS vs. Reginald CARR
and his brother, Jonathan.

"This case involves a home invasion, repeated rapes and sexual
assaults, armed robberies, burglary, abductions, theft and car-jacking
as well as the execution-style murders of naked victims in a
snow-covered soccer field.

"Aside from the Internet and local media, the mainstream national
media has suppressed news coverage of these most HEINOUS atrocities
outside of the State of Kansas. The case also involves a gag order in
which (considering ONE HUNDRED THIRTEEN FELONY COUNTS) the public has
yet to learn the full extent of this outrage!

"Please have full COURT TV national coverage of Kansas v. Carr. Bros?
Veteran homicide detectives can assure all that it does NOT get ANY
WORSE than the WICHITA MASSACRE!"

Please, please give this trial national coverage -- so pleaded
hundreds of White people outraged at the silence of the media. (It
should have been hundreds of thousands, but give the new White media
time to grow.) It looked too good to be true when Time-Warner's
CourtTV, in the person of chief anchor Fred Graham, announced in
September that they would air "gavel-to-gavel" coverage of the Wichita
Massacre trial. That statement sent a wave of hope through the White
community, but that hope was dashed to the ground when, a few weeks
later, CourtTV abruptly decided to drop all but minimal coverage of
the trial. At around the same time, many discussions on CourtTV's own
message board about the case suddenly disappeared, and those who tried
to re-post the deleted information or protest the censorship found
that their accounts had been terminated and
their messages erased.

There had been no public protest of the upcoming trial coverage.
Despite the arrogance of the anti-White forces in our society, they
still didn't dare to publicly call for censorship of such a horrific
crime. The pressures that forced the change in plans were
behind-the-scenes pressures, pressures that have been kept secret from
us. The ostensible reason given by front man Graham for nixing the
Wichita Massacre coverage was the upcoming trial of a rabbi accused of
murdering his wife. That in itself would be enough to make us suspect
intentional misdirection from Jewish sources, even if we hadn't
discovered the fact that CourtTV is, according to their own Web site,
a proud "partner" with the Jewish Anti-Defamation League of B'nai
Brith, whose anti-White activities are well known. CourtTV states on
their own Web site that the ADL "is one of the nation's premier civil
rights/human relations agencies fighting anti-Semitism and all forms
of bigotry, defending democratic ideals, and protecting civil rights."

I also checked the ADL's own Web site, and they announce proudly that,
right around the time that the coverage of the Wichita Massacre would
have started, CourtTV will be airing an ADL-sponsored program called
"Empowering Children in the Aftermath of Hate." What an interesting
coincidence. When one sees these connections, and remembers that
heavily-Jewish Time Warner is a major owner of CourtTV, it is no
longer
surprising that CourtTV suddenly -- and at the last minute -- pulled
the rug out from under coverage of the Wichita Massacre Trial, leaving
other networks ill-prepared to step in even if they had wanted to.

The Jewish minority in the United States has a virtual monopoly
control over our mass media, and all decisions that they make are
decisions which place Jewish interests first. That is the key to
understanding why CourtTV didn't cover this trial; that is the key to
understanding why White people aren't allowed to have any institutions
or preferences for
themselves, that is they key to understanding why outrages like the
Wichita Massacre aren't considered hate crimes - even when they
involve Blacks targeting only Whites seven times in a row, even when
they involve gross sexual degradation and murder of Whites by Blacks,
and even when racial references are made by the attackers - while at
the same time Whites who post an innocent sticker saying that Whites
are an endangered species are charged with hate crimes. Understanding
the facts and the consequences of Jewish media control are the keys to
understanding what has happened to our country. I hope you'll continue
to listen to these programs and write to us for a copy of our book
catalog and magazine so you can understand the problem more fully and
help us solve it in the future. Without Jewish media control, the
situation in America would never have deteriorated to the point that
made the Wichita Massacre possible. Even in the America of today,
without Jewish media control changing the massacre from a hate crime
to a hush crime the outrage from an enlightened White population would
sweep the nation. Understanding media control is the key to
understanding our current paralysis.
0 new messages