'Bammy Dropping Fast in Latest Rasmussen Poll!
wolfagain
Today Obama has 41% strongly approve vs 24% strongly disapprove. A
HUGE drop in only 13 days for a new President! Looks like the voters
are starting to wise up to this ill-bred Fool and his socialist agenda!
Dennis
"wolfagain" <wo...@provide.net> wrote in message
news:3bfa6185-bb4a-4e51...@v31g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
> Jan 22 Obama had 45% Strongly approve vs 14% strongly disapprove.
> Today Obama has 41% strongly approve vs 24% strongly disapprove. A
> are starting to wise up to this ill-bred Fool and his socialist agenda!
Yep, I predict voter regret within six months of B.O. The Bam-ster's taking
office, the
Republicans re-taking Congress in two years, and B.O., T.B.'s bony ass
being kicked out in four...if he survives.
Check out left wing-nut blogs and loon lib radio...it's already starting.
It's gonna be fun watching the implosion.
Dionysus
Liberal...@xemaps.com
get back to us.
Who i$ John Galt
> When you conservatives have solutions to ANY of America's problems --
> get back to us.
Amend the Constitution so that every law passed by congress must have a
sunset clause and be individually voted on or it is sunset into eternity
after 6 years....
Liberal Whisperer
> When you conservatives have solutions to ANY of America's problems --
> get back to us.
Our solutions are to get rid of the starry eyed tax/spend utopians in
congress and the Whitehouse that are on the verge of spending
$trillions on a porkulous bill that my grandkid's grandkids will be
responsible for paying off.
Patriot Games
wrote:
The "bromance" is over....
The Socialist Democrats will self-destruct between now and 2010.....
Patriot Games
wrote:
>When you conservatives have solutions to ANY of America's problems --
>get back to us.
Why would we WASTE OUR TIME on PROVEN LIARS?
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:26:38 -0800 (PST), Liberal...@xemaps.com
wrote:
>On Dec 19, 11:17 am, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:57:32 -0800 (PST), LiberalPatr...@xemaps.com
>> wrote:
>> >On Dec 9, 6:26 am, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>> >> You don't need one. The VOTERS SAID SO, that's your reason.
>> >In OUR state the votes APPROVED gay marriage
AT NO TIME, NOT ONCE, NOT EVER did Oregonians vote to APPROVE Fag
Marriage.
The ONE AND ONLY TIME Oregonians voted "November 2, 2004: Oregonians
voted 57% to 43% to pass Ballot Measure 36, a constitutional amendment
defining marriage to be between one man and one woman.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage_in_Oregon
Since it is IMPOSSIBLE for ANYONE to mistakenly think a vote AGAINST
Fag Marriage is a vote FOR Fag Marriage I have NO CHOICE BUT TO
CONCLUDE THAT YOU ARE A LIAR.
>OK, I'll give you that point. I was wrong. I bill was passed in the
>legislature, not by ballot. But it was passed by representatives
>that Oregonians voted for. So, the difference is only procedural.
No. AT NO TIME, EVER, did such a Bill pass the Oregon Legislature.
16 March 2004: Following public hearings, Benton County commissioners
voted 2-1 to start issuing marriage licenses to same sex couples,
beginning Wednesday, 24 March 2004.
22 March 2004: After receiving two letters from the attorney general
and a phone call threatening to arrest the county clerk, the Benton
county commissioners reversed their decision and voted to issue no
marriage licenses of any kind—neither same-sex nor
opposite-sex—pending a decision by the Multnomah County Court.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage_in_Oregon
>But my point is the same
Your point is to LIE CONSTANTLY UNTIL CAUGHT.
YOU HAVE BEEN CAUGHT.
>PS: You sure pull out that LIAR thing fast! Why are you so touchy?
I absolutely despise LIARS.
YOU ARE A LIAR.
YOU ARE A PROVEN LIAR.
>If you catch me in something factually wrong, it's an honest mistake
>-- usually because I'm tired. Just correct me, don't call me a liar.
Sorry, its NOT POSSIBLE TO BE REPEATEDLY WRONG unless you are actually
RETARDED or are a LIAR.
YOU ARE A LIAR.
YOU ARE A PROVEN LIAR.
>I TRY to be fully accurate and usually Google before I write -- but
>holy smokes man, I'm not intentionally lying.
Yes, you were intentionally LYING, twice.
You ALREADY HAD THE Google Reference and STILL LIED ABOUT A
Legislative Bill that NEVER EXISTED and was NEVER VOTED ON BECAUSE IT
NEVER EXISTED.
>In this case, I honestly thought it was a ballot initiative rather
>than a bill.
And it WASN'T a Bill either!
YOU ARE A LIAR.
YOU ARE A PROVEN LIAR.
Paulie Walnutts
wrote:
> chicken to actually provide a LINK to said poll, maroon, which, FYI, lying
> rightard maroon, is nothing more than a DAILY TRACKING poll...
>
> Er, do tell, Dip Thunker, precisely how rock hard, super dense,
> singularity-type STUPID must one be before one concludes that 4 points is a
> HUGE shift in a poll with a 3% margin of error?
>
> <tap, tap, tap>
>
> You see, Dip Thunker, those of us in the triple digit club may never know
> just how fucking STUPID one must be to think 4 points, which, FYI, Dip
> Thunker, is well within the MARGIN OF ERROR (3 up, 3 down = 6, maroon)
> somehow constitutes a HUGE shift without your help.
>
> Well?
>
> Jaybus Freaking Crisco, and these drooling cretins STILL haven't the
> foggiest clue why they had their stupid asses handed to them in the last two
> elections with even worse prospects on the horizon. The Republidolts
> continue their headlong plummet into political obscurity...
>
> You worked hard for this. You've earned it. You deserve it. And now your
> lying stupid goober ass is getting it, but good, maroon. Enjoy!
SSDD. THe same old beating of chests and saying the Americans wanted a
mandate to move the country to the far left. You kooks STILL don't get
it do you? You probably think Clinton was impeached for marinating
seegars in a fat interns smelly gash.
WBY...@ireland.com
As opposed to the mega billions that went down the rathole in Iraq
never to be seen again? I notice you have now perfected the 'mind
meld' with porkulous Limbaugh.
WB Yeats
Patriot Games
<petes...@gSNIPTHISPARTmail.com> wrote:
>And you subliterate stupid assholes STILL don't get that Clinton was
>ACQUITTED.
Liars are exposed:
Clinton was IMPEACHED in the House, December 19, 1998.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton
>You subliterate stupid assholes STILL don't get that Bill Clinton is STILL
>*far* more popular than, oh, say, ANY Republidolt.
Liars are exposed:
Most Admired Man and Woman
"What man that you have heard or read about, living today in any part
of the world, do you admire most? And who is your second choice?"
RECENT TREND: COMBINED FIRST AND SECOND CHOICES
(Ranked according to number of responses, 2007)
1 George W. Bush 10
2 Bill Clinton 8
3 Al Gore 6
4 Barack Obama 5
5 Rev. Billy Graham 3
6 Nelson Mandela 3
7 George H.W. Bush 2
8t Bill Gates 2
8t Pope Benedict XVI 2
8t Jimmy Carter 2
1 Hillary Clinton 18
2 Oprah Winfrey 16
3 Condoleezza Rice 5
4 Angelina Jolie 3
5 Laura Bush 3
6 Margaret Thatcher 2
7 Benazir Bhutto 2
8 Nancy Pelosi 1
9 Maya Angelou 1
10 Queen Elizabeth 1
http://www.gallup.com/poll/1678/Most-Admired-Man-Woman.aspx
>Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit. Slow thinkers keep right.
Frauds are exposed:
From: Hans Metterling <hans.me...@SNIPITgmail.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.188.230.193
From: Peter Perfect <petes...@gSNIPTHISPARTmail.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.188.230.193
Patriot Games
<petes...@gSNIPTHISPARTmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:28:25 -0500, Patriot Games <Pat...@America.Com>
>wrote:
>>On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:17:52 -0600, Peter Perfect
>><petes...@gSNIPTHISPARTmail.com> wrote:
>>>And you subliterate stupid assholes STILL don't get that Clinton was
>>>ACQUITTED.
>>Liars are exposed:
>>Clinton was IMPEACHED in the House, December 19, 1998.
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton
>Representatives on December 19, 1998, and ACQUITTED (caps mine) by the
>Senate on February 12, 1999. "
The acquital DID NOT REMOVE the Impeachment.
So... Hans... Still hoping to meet some 14-year boys in Hawaii???
Hahahahahahahaha!!!
Poetic Justice
> On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:33:39 -0600, Peter Perfect
> <petes...@gSNIPTHISPARTmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:28:25 -0500, Patriot Games <Pat...@America.Com>
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:17:52 -0600, Peter Perfect
>>> <petes...@gSNIPTHISPARTmail.com> wrote:
>>>> And you subliterate stupid assholes STILL don't get that Clinton was
>>>> ACQUITTED.
>>> Liars are exposed:
>>> Clinton was IMPEACHED in the House, December 19, 1998.
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton
>> "Bill Clinton, President of the United States was impeached by the House of
>> Representatives on December 19, 1998, and ACQUITTED (caps mine) by the
>> Senate on February 12, 1999. "
Impeachment is the process of removing someone from office.
All that means is that they didn't remove him from office.
Which is not connected to him losing his license to practice law in
Arkansas, which was adjudicated by the courts.
Patriot Games
<@HTTP://Poetic-Justice.Talk-n-Dog.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:33:39 -0600, Peter Perfect
>> <petes...@gSNIPTHISPARTmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:28:25 -0500, Patriot Games <Pat...@America.Com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:17:52 -0600, Peter Perfect
>>>> <petes...@gSNIPTHISPARTmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> And you subliterate stupid assholes STILL don't get that Clinton was
>>>>> ACQUITTED.
>>>> Liars are exposed:
>>>> Clinton was IMPEACHED in the House, December 19, 1998.
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton
>>> "Bill Clinton, President of the United States was impeached by the House of
>>> Representatives on December 19, 1998, and ACQUITTED (caps mine) by the
>>> Senate on February 12, 1999. "
>Impeachment is the process of removing someone from office.
Sort of: Impeachment is the TWO STEP process THAT ENDS WITH removing
someone from office.
>All that means is that they didn't remove him from office.
Correct. He remains impeached.
>Which is not connected to him losing his license to practice law in
>Arkansas, which was adjudicated by the courts.
He didn't lose his license. His license was suspended for 5 years. He
got it back.
http://courts.state.ar.us/attorneys/attorney_info.cfm?number=0073019
Poetic Justice
He lost it for several years, yes that was understood. The point being
that Bill Clinton was impeached, not removed from office and did lose
his ability to practice law in Arkansas for some period of time.
Clinton wasn't a bad guy, just a sleazy guy. He would have made a great
car salesman, he just didn't make all that great of a President.
> http://courts.state.ar.us/attorneys/attorney_info.cfm?number=0073019
>
>
>
Patriot Games
Yep. He will REMAIN an Impeached President FOREVER.
NOTHING can erase that stain.
>Clinton wasn't a bad guy, just a sleazy guy. He would have made a great
>car salesman, he just didn't make all that great of a President.
I agree he was sleazy guy.
But he was also extremely bad for America.
He had a chance to crush Al Qaeda before they really got strong, and
he failed.
He had a chance to crush the Taliban before they really got strong,
and he failed.
I consider him to be the Second Worst President in modern American
history, right behind Carter.
The only known photo of Reagan eating a small immigrant child.
Rasmussen is a Republican hack. His polls are always skewed to the
right. Might as well use a Fox News poll.
Kali
Pat...@America.Com says...
Except for that Senate acquittal granted February 12, 1999.
...
--
Kali
“This is not a stimulus bill; it is a spending bill.”
-Sen. John McCain
“What do you think a stimulus is? Spending, that is the whole
point.” -Pres. Barack Obama
Poetic Justice
Not erased. Not even expunged. Nor is it pardoned.
What it "is", is Impeached.....
> ....
Patriot Games
Prove it.
>Might as well use a Fox News poll.
They don't have their own Polls, 'tard.
Patriot Games
Sorry, the acquital DID NOT change that. He was and remains
IMPEACHED, forever.
Poetic Justice
> On Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:41:53 -0500, Poetic Justice
>
>>> On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:33:39 -0600, Peter Perfect
>>> <petes...@gSNIPTHISPARTmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:28:25 -0500, Patriot Games <Pat...@America.Com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:17:52 -0600, Peter Perfect
>>>>> <petes...@gSNIPTHISPARTmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> And you subliterate stupid assholes STILL don't get that Clinton was
>>>>>> ACQUITTED.
>>>>> Liars are exposed:
>>>>> Clinton was IMPEACHED in the House, December 19, 1998.
>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton
>>>> "Bill Clinton, President of the United States was impeached by the House of
>>>> Representatives on December 19, 1998, and ACQUITTED (caps mine) by the
>>>> Senate on February 12, 1999. "
>> Impeachment is the process of removing someone from office.
>> All that means is that they didn't remove him from office.
>
> analogous to indictment. Both are set aside by an ACQUITTAL.
>
What you can't grasp is that once you have been indicted, even if you
were acquitted, you were still indicted.....
As with once having been impeached, you have forever been impeached, be
you Acquitted or not.
It's fairly rare and says something, just for that reason.
If you work on it for a while, I'd bet even you will get it.
> While the simpleton fails to grasp it, it really is very simple.. It's a
> one, two, three process. One, impeachment or indictment. Two, trial. Three,
> punishment or, as in Clinton's case ACQUITTAL.
>
> But hey, who expects a wrinkled old racists Nazi wannabe loon to employ
> logic? Or perhaps they have another word for ACQUITTAL over there in
> Batshitcrazystan.
Dunno.... who expects?
JoeTheBlogger
> On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:40:50 -0800 (PST), Liberal Whisperer
> <hoofhe...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On Feb 2, 2:31 pm, LiberalPatr...@xemaps.com wrote:
>>> When you conservatives have solutions to ANY of America's problems --
>>> get back to us.
>> Our solutions are to get rid of the starry eyed tax/spend utopians in
>> congress and the Whitehouse that are on the verge of spending
>> $trillions on a porkulous bill that my grandkid's grandkids will be
>> responsible for paying off.
>
> As opposed to the mega billions that went down the rathole in Iraq
> never to be seen again?
Poetic Justice
like the Bail-out money will be.
JoeTheBlogger
Jack A. Lopes
<j...@blog.ger> wrote:
Why weren't you making a fuss when the Republicans were getting us into
this mess over the last 8 years? And now you are going to whine when
the dems attempt to clean up the mess you helped make?!
--
1+1+1+1...
JoeTheBlogger
THE DRIVE BY MEDIA SQUAWKING HEADS. U MUST BE OBAMORONIC TO NOT KNOW THAT.
Harold Burton
Because the DemocRATs were the ones who started it in the first place
with their concept, expressed by Barney Frank, that banks should give
loans to everyone regardless of whether he had a chance of paying it
back.
Patriot Games
<petes...@gSNIPTHISPARTmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:08:32 -0500, Patriot Games <Pat...@America.Com>
>wrote:
>>On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:33:39 -0600, Peter Perfect
>><petes...@gSNIPTHISPARTmail.com> wrote:
>>>On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:28:25 -0500, Patriot Games <Pat...@America.Com>
>>>wrote:
>>>>On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:17:52 -0600, Peter Perfect
>>>><petes...@gSNIPTHISPARTmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>And you subliterate stupid assholes STILL don't get that Clinton was
>>>>>ACQUITTED.
>>>>Liars are exposed:
>>>>Clinton was IMPEACHED in the House, December 19, 1998.
>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton
>>>"Bill Clinton, President of the United States was impeached by the House of
>>>Representatives on December 19, 1998, and ACQUITTED (caps mine) by the
>>>Senate on February 12, 1999. "
>>The acquital DID NOT REMOVE the Impeachment.
>>So... Hans... Still hoping to meet some 14-year boys in Hawaii???
>>Hahahahahahahaha!!!
You didn't say anything, you LIED.
Go fuck yourself "Hans" and leave the little boys alone.
Patriot Games
<petes...@gSNIPTHISPARTmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:41:53 -0500, Poetic Justice
>>> On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:33:39 -0600, Peter Perfect
>>> <petes...@gSNIPTHISPARTmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:28:25 -0500, Patriot Games <Pat...@America.Com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:17:52 -0600, Peter Perfect
>>>>> <petes...@gSNIPTHISPARTmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> And you subliterate stupid assholes STILL don't get that Clinton was
>>>>>> ACQUITTED.
>>>>> Liars are exposed:
>>>>> Clinton was IMPEACHED in the House, December 19, 1998.
>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton
>>>> "Bill Clinton, President of the United States was impeached by the House of
>>>> Representatives on December 19, 1998, and ACQUITTED (caps mine) by the
>>>> Senate on February 12, 1999. "
>>Impeachment is the process of removing someone from office.
>>All that means is that they didn't remove him from office.
>analogous to indictment. Both are set aside by an ACQUITTAL.
Wrong, "Hans."