L. Ron Hubbard wasn’t “Perfect”
Jonathon Barbera
L. Ron Hubbard wasn�t �Perfect�
http://freedomofimagination.wordpress.com/2009/09/22/l-ron-hubbard-wasnt-perfect/
The applied religious philosophy of Scientology is not built upon L.
Ron Hubbard�s background or character.
Scientology is a technology. In no way is the workability of the
technology or the accuracy of the data needed to use the technology a
reflection of L. Ron Hubbard. If it had been, Scientology would be
nothing more than a collection of ideas imagined by L. Ron Hubbard
that he then insisted must be true. That would be delusion. Instead,
anyone can apply the technology and see its workability for himself or
herself. The workability isn�t based on blind faith or gullibility.
When Prometheus stole fire from the gods and delivered it to the
people, did they stop to question his background before accepting the
new technology? Did the so-called �critics� of Prometheus sit in the
dark because they were certain he was a �bad man?�
Yes, Prometheus is from Greek �mythology� (another word for ancient
entertainment media). The same logic could be applied to any scientist
who invented something useful. If Thomas Edison had been a �bad man�
in his life, would people refuse to use electric light in protest of
his background and character?
L. Ron Hubbard was not a bad man � but he also wasn�t a �perfect� man.
Good! If he had been a �perfect� man, then he would have been too
perfect for me or you. Had he been too �perfect,� he would be far off
and beyond our reach. Instead, L. Ron Hubbard was an ordinary man who
could and still does communicate to people on a level most can
understand.
L. Ron Hubbard didn�t fill his lectures with academic language that
only professors of English would appreciate. On the contrary, he tells
jokes and uses funny voices and sound effects. L. Ron Hubbard was an
ordinary man who traced a route that ordinary people could follow. L.
Ron Hubbard developed a technology that ordinary people could study
and use for their own personal betterment and the betterment of those
around them.
Rev. 11D Meow!
and big red rubber ball nose for today's Kook Parade here on
alt.slack.
Barbara Schwarz
wrote:
> L. Ron Hubbard wasn’t “Perfect”
>
He was perfect, Jonathon but his impostor and his forgers made it look
like he would be not.
See you feel bored (can't blame you) and try to wake up our neighbors
the mud slinging slackers. ;)
Barbara Schwarz
--
Tilman Joerg Hausherr, from Berlin, Siemens employee webs defamation
on me that he and Korey Jerome Kruse aka Simkatu and
other socks scribbled once on Wikipedia:
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/media-newsroom/tilman-hausherr/
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/media-newsroom/tilman-hausherr/
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/intolerance-hate/whistle-blowers/the-clearwater-letters/tilman-hausherr/
http://bernie.cncfamily.com/sc/kids.htm#Debate_with_Tilman_Hausherr
http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=Hausherr&btnG=Google+Search&domains=BERNIE.CNCFAMILY.COM&sitesearch=BERNIE.CNCFAMILY.COM
http://www.alarmgermany.org/tilman.htm
http://cyber-stalker-korey-jerome-kruse.blogspot.com/
http://phorums.com.au/archive/index.php/t-156307.html
Rev. 11D Meow!
her part in today's Kook Parade on alt.slack.
Gregory Hall
news:cvnib55d92dn2u9aq...@4ax.com...
> And Barbara Schwarz is wearing only a rainbow-tinted fright wig for
> her part in today's Kook Parade on alt.slack.
Did she borrow it from this creep?
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/
--
Gregory Hall
Barbara Schwarz
> "Rev. 11D Meow!" <Ji...@Crack.corn> wrote in messagenews:cvnib55d92dn2u9aq...@4ax.com...
>
> > And Barbara Schwarz is wearing only a rainbow-tinted fright wig for
> > her part in today's Kook Parade on alt.slack.
>
> Did she borrow it from this creep?
>
> http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/
>
> --
> Gregory Hall
I would never borrow anything of Garry Scarff. I strongly suspect he
has head lice.
Jonathon Barbera
The alt.slack posters bring a moderate viewpoint to help dilute the
otherwise extremist fanaticism against Scientology from many of the
ars regulars.
Works out similarly to how you invited Gregory Hall from
alt.usenet.kooks to post regularly here. He might not know too much
about Scientology, but at least he isn't irrationally opposed to it.
Rev. 11D Meow!
Kook Parade on alt.slack.
Rev. 11D Meow!
<BarbaraSc...@excite.com> wrote:
>On Sep 22, 6:45�pm, "Gregory Hall" <gregh...@home.fake> wrote:
>>
>> Did she borrow it from this creep?
>>
>> http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/
>>
>> --
>> Gregory Hall
>
>I would never borrow anything of Garry Scarff. I strongly suspect he
>has head lice.
>
>
>Barbara Schwarz
See the kooks dance in today Kook Parade on alt.slack.
Rev. 11D Meow!
DANCE SCIENTOLOGY KOOKS, DANCE!
Jonathon Barbera
wrote:
SusietheFloozie
wrote:
> L. Ron Hubbard wasn’t “Perfect”
But scienofag Travolta WAS!
Gregory Hall
news:6ce8f535-f5ea-4a01...@z28g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
> But scienofag Travolta WAS!
>
> http://racksandrazors.com/Pics/perfect.jpg
I see nothing but Jamie Lee Curtis. She's a 10!
--
Gregory Hall
Rev. Richard Skull
>
L. Ron was a Pufter and Gerbil Molester!
Barbara loves Marty
Never heard anybody say that the slackers are moderate people.
> Works out similarly to how you invited Gregory Hall from
> alt.usenet.kooks to post regularly here. He might not know too much
> about Scientology, but at least he isn't irrationally opposed to it.
I didn't invite Greg to post here. He came over here on his own. But I
posted that he has a right to post here as anybody else.
And I still think that. I sure hoped he would take some classes in how
to treat a lady.
Rev. Susie the Floozie
<barbaralovesmarty...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I didn't invite Greg to post here. He came over here on his own. But I
> posted that he has a right to post here as anybody else.
> And I still think that. I sure hoped he would take some classes in how
> to treat a lady.
>
> Barbara Schwarz
Am I the only one here who notices this--but isn't Babs exactly like
Ruth "Uriel" Norman if Uriel was an old drunk who lived in a trailer
park and dyed her grey hair india-ink-black instead of pink and smoked
four packs of Kools a day on top of the raging meth habit and lotto
addiction? You know the type, a housecoated horror who'd hang off the
cinderblock "porch" of her trailer to vomit copiously, then lurch
inside and crack open another beer? A stringy, hard, leathery
alcoholic who would disingenuously pretend not to notice how she
jacked off her chihuahua with her elbow while giving him noogies?
Exactly like that.
Creepy, huh?
Tater Gumfries
wrote:
> L. Ron Hubbard wasn’t “Perfect”
>
>
> The applied religious philosophy of Scientology is not built upon L.
> Ron Hubbard’s background or character.
Yeah, it is. You won't convince anyone with your revisionist nonsense.
Tater
Unclaimed Mysteries
>>
>> http://freedomofimagination.wordpress.com/2009/09/22/l-ron-hubbard-wa...
>>
>> The applied religious philosophy of Scientology is not built upon L.
>
> Yeah, it is. You won't convince anyone with your revisionist nonsense.
>
> Tater
>
I think they're on to something. L. Ron Hubbard was merely the front
man. The real power was a little-known individual named J. Edgar Cayce,
of Fort Davis, Texas. He "accidentally" invented the Church of
Scientology in 1949 when he made a cold solder joint while building a
Heathkit oscilloscope. This circuit flaw later became the electronic
foundation for his A, B, C, and D-meters. Unfortunately, these models
had a 50% mortality factor, so the E-meter was outsourced to a trusted
third party manufacturer.
The name of that manufacturer? You guessed it: Dobbskit Industries,
Malaysia. E-meter fatalities fell to 25% and that was enough to get the
Church of Scientology out of financial trouble. The rest, is LIES. ALL LIES!
I've enjoyed this little excursion into history and hope it distracts us
from the memory of "Perfect," a movie that sucked harder than the
supermassive black hole that lurks at the center of our galaxy.
-cls
--
It Came From Corry Lee Smith's Unclaimed Mysteries.
http://www.unclaimedmysteries.net
Tater Gumfries
<theLetterKandtheNumeral4-...@unclaimedmysteries.net> wrote:
> Tater Gumfries wrote:
> > On Sep 22, 5:34 pm, Jonathon Barbera <jonathonbarb...@ispname.net>
> > wrote:
>
> >>http://freedomofimagination.wordpress.com/2009/09/22/l-ron-hubbard-wa...
>
> >> The applied religious philosophy of Scientology is not built upon L.
>
> > Yeah, it is. You won't convince anyone with your revisionist nonsense.
>
> > Tater
>
> I think they're on to something. L. Ron Hubbard was merely the front
> man. The real power was a little-known individual named J. Edgar Cayce,
> of Fort Davis, Texas. He "accidentally" invented the Church of
> Scientology in 1949 when he made a cold solder joint while building a
> Heathkit oscilloscope. This circuit flaw later became the electronic
> foundation for his A, B, C, and D-meters. Unfortunately, these models
> had a 50% mortality factor, so the E-meter was outsourced to a trusted
> third party manufacturer.
>
> The name of that manufacturer? You guessed it: Dobbskit Industries,
> Malaysia. E-meter fatalities fell to 25% and that was enough to get the
> Church of Scientology out of financial trouble. The rest, is LIES. ALL LIES!
>
> I've enjoyed this little excursion into history and hope it distracts us
> from the memory of "Perfect," a movie that sucked harder than the
> supermassive black hole that lurks at the center of our galaxy.
>
> -cls
This is why alt.slack is so dang valuable. You learn something new
every couple months or so.
Tater
Gregory Hall
news:1d898d54-3927-454c...@q14g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
>
> I didn't invite Greg to post here. He came over here on his own. But I
> posted that he has a right to post here as anybody else.
> And I still think that. I sure hoped he would take some classes in how
> to treat a lady.
How about some "private lessons?" He hee!
But, seriously, the trouble is, aside from yourself, I don't know any
"ladies" around here so learning how to treat a lady would be pretty much a
waste of time.
Would you have me treat like a lady the likes of Claire, Tigger, Barbz,
Monica, SusietheFloozy and any other such female trash who post here? They
would ignore me thinking surely I must be talking to somebody else. They
only way to successfully relate to them is to crawl right down there in the
gutter with them.
--
Gregory Hall
Pisces
> "Barbara loves Marty" <barbaralovesmarty...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:1d898d54-3927-454c...@q14g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
Tell them what you did to Edna.
Be honest, tell them about your crimes. Tell her what you did to Edna.
Rev. Back It On Up 13
>
> - Show quoted text -
Edna Flan will be the first to tell you that this person does NOT know
how to tread a lady. That one particular incident in 1997 - Pisces,
I'm sure you know the one - stands on its own as a low point in
chivalry.
Rev. 11D Meow!
Barbara Schwarz prefers shiny gentlemen named Marty, Greg.
Did you get that sex change yet, so you can pretend to be one, Greg?
Everyone KNOWS Gregory Hall is a 'nym for some 97 year-old fat droopy
titty greasy slob leather skin cancerous slimy bitch hoping to find
some Sweet As Summer Pie to lick.
Oh, Barbara Schwarz, in the future it'd be Super Clean to stick to
your guns and CLING TO MARTY. We all know you're slipping and falling
for this faker, Gregory Hall. And seriously, TAKE A BATH, Barbara!!!
Even Cleveland is having a parade in your honor when you finally get
your stench lathered away, that they're having to fend-off with
surplus WW I gas masks.
Rev. 11D Meow!
Is it any wonder Barbara Schwarz has less than zero interest in
attaching her stanky poon to Gregory Hall's syphilitic pecker?
Gregory's history of treading on women is too widely known for any
sensible bright shiny woman to ignore.
Hence the impass.
Gregory Hall strives to overcome his propensity for treading woman.
Barbara Schwarz endeavors to seek the Marty that was never there.
Never the twain shall meat, so to speak.
Rev. Back It On Up 13
>
> - Show quoted text -
Beautifully said. I sense that you were mocking my syntax up above.
Please be gentle, I speak with an accent.
This message is no less poignant for that. I think you deserve some
sort of award for your most recent observations.
Rev. 11D Meow!
>Beautifully said. I sense that you were mocking my syntax up above.
>Please be gentle, I speak with an accent.
>
>This message is no less poignant for that. I think you deserve some
>sort of award for your most recent observations.
I just wish Google Group Gropes would fix their
- Show quoted text -
- Hide quoted text -
serious fuck-up.
I blaze alacritional tiredness having to manually delete there shit.
:)
oh, and most of the best textual-based jokes happen from a typo.
Voltaire's
> "Barbara loves Marty" <barbaralovesmarty...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:1d898d54-3927-454c...@q14g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > I didn't invite Greg to post here. He came over here on his own. But I
> > posted that he has a right to post here as anybody else.
> > And I still think that. I sure hoped he would take some classes in how
> > to treat a lady.
>
> How about some "private lessons?" He hee!
>
> But, seriously, the trouble is, aside from yourself, I don't know any
> "ladies" around here so learning how to treat a lady would be pretty much a
> waste of time.
>
> Monica, SusietheFloozy and any other such female trash who post here? They
> would ignore me thinking surely I must be talking to somebody else. They
> only way to successfully relate to them is to crawl right down there in the
> gutter with them.
Thank you for admitting and confirming that your posts are in the
gutter and are trash.
C
Gregory Hall
news:778eb235-0e8f-4648...@z28g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
<snippage>
>
> Beautifully said. I sense that you were mocking my syntax up above.
> Please be gentle, I speak with an accent.
>
> This message is no less poignant for that. I think you deserve some
> sort of award for your most recent observations.
Wow! Talk about a reach around! Probably threw your shoulder out of joint on
that one, dude!
--
Gregory Hall
Rev. Ivan Stang
> "Rev. Back It On Up 13" <eviel...@aol.com> wrote in messagenews:778eb235-0e8f-4648...@z28g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
> <snippage>
>
>
>
> > Beautifully said. I sense that you were mocking my syntax up above.
> > Please be gentle, I speak with an accent.
>
> > This message is no less poignant for that. I think you deserve some
> > sort of award for your most recent observations.
>
> Wow! Talk about a reach around! Probably threw your shoulder out of joint on
> that one, dude!
>
> --
> Gregory Hall
I see you are very sensitive to nuances.
Rev. Back It On Up 13
>
> - Show quoted text -
I would expect nothing less than this level of astuteness from our
Scientologist friends.
Barbara Schwarz
>
> - Show quoted text -
Greg Hall is not a Scientologist and I doubt that he is a friend of
Scientology. He is a Christian.
Zapanaz
>wrote:
>> Scientology is a technology.
No it isn't. It's a grab-bag of pseudo-science and mumbo-jumbo.
For it to be a technology, it would need to be an application of some
form of science. But it isn't. I'm not even saying that the
underlying science doesn't hold up, it doesn't exist. Nowhere does
anybody even try to describe what the underlying science is. It's
just believed with religious faith that it is perfect.
And nobody could describe the "underlying science" of Scientology
because it's pretty clearly established that most of it comes from
"visions" and "intuitions" of Hubbard's. I mean just dig around, you
can find the original hand-written screeds where he "realizes" the
different auditing "rundowns" and so on. They appear whole cloth,
there isn't even the vaguest indication that Hubbard is working from
some underlying body of theory.
If Hubbard doesn't know where it comes from, nobody does. There is
just this vague belief that he is plugged into some vast mysterious
alien intelligence.
Face it. If you want to believe that Hubbard was plugged into some
vast mysterious alien intelligence, fine, you're fairly gullible, go
ahead. But science that ain't.
>> In no way is the workability of the
>> technology or the accuracy of the data needed to use the technology a
>> reflection of L. Ron Hubbard.
So if "the technology" didn't work for the very guy who invented it,
you don't think that might be an indication that it doesn't work at
all?
If it's truly a "technology", as opposed to some vague grab bag of
supposed self-improvement techniques, then it should work regardless
of who is using it. If its results are inconsistent, then it isn't "a
technology" at all.
It's like if I went around saying I'd invented cold fusion. BUT, I
can't make it work. But the fact that I can't make it work doesn't
invalidate my "technology".
That makes no sense.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
Thought about the size difference between a bear and a man lately?
:: Currently listening to Lady Jane, 1967, by The Rolling Stones/Brian Jones, from "Flowers"
Zapanaz
>> > Would you have me treat like a lady the likes of Claire, Tigger, Barbz,
>> > Monica, SusietheFloozy and any other such female trash who post here? They
>> > would ignore me thinking surely I must be talking to somebody else.
Yesss, they seem like the types to ignore you thinking surely you must
be talking to somebody else, to ME, too!
>> > They
>> > only way to successfully relate to them is to crawl right down there in the
>> > gutter with them.
That certainly seems like a well-thought-out strategy to me. That
probably is they only way to relate to them. And you certainly should
make every effort to relate to they people who think you're a babbling
idiot. That just stands to they reason.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
More than any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness. The other, to total extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly.
- Woody Allen
:: Currently listening to I See You, 1966, by The Byrds, from "Fifth Dimension"
Zapanaz
<BarbaraSc...@excite.com> wrote:
>On Sep 24, 11:16锟絘m, "Rev. Back It On Up 13" <eviel...@aol.com> wrote:
>> On Sep 24, 12:02锟絧m, "Rev. Ivan Stang" <st...@subgenius.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Sep 24, 11:41锟絘m, "Gregory Hall" <gregh...@home.fake> wrote:
>>
>> > > "Rev. Back It On Up 13" <eviel...@aol.com> wrote in messagenews:778eb235-0e8f-4648...@z28g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
>> > > <snippage>
>>
>> > > > Beautifully said. 锟絀 sense that you were mocking my syntax up above.
>> > > > Please be gentle, I speak with an accent.
>>
>> > > > This message is no less poignant for that. 锟絀 think you deserve some
>> > > > sort of award for your most recent observations.
>>
>> > > Wow! Talk about a reach around! Probably threw your shoulder out of joint on
>> > > that one, dude!
>>
>> > > --
>> > > Gregory Hall
>>
>> > I see you are very sensitive to nuances.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> I would expect nothing less than this level of astuteness from our
>> Scientologist friends.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>Greg Hall is not a Scientologist and I doubt that he is a friend of
>Scientology. He is a Christian.
He wants in your pants. Come on Barb, he deserves at least a
pity-fuck after all this time.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
All our beliefs are being challenged now, and rightfully so they're stupid.
- Bill Hicks
Gregory Hall
news:d2973f4e-f4bb-4d78...@m11g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
> Greg Hall is not a Scientologist and I doubt that he is a friend of
> Scientology. He is a Christian.
I am a friend of Scientology and on their side against the extremists
though, of course, I don't accept all their teachings.
P.S. Subject line corrected.
--
Gregory Hall
Gregory Hall
message news:7c0tb5lrgufbac52u...@4ax.com...
If you expect an answer from Barbara you need to stop being so primitive.
Being primitive is a sign of low intelligence. Hmmmm, perhaps you have no
CHOICE but being primitive. Never mind!
--
Gregory Hall
Zapanaz
Crazy chicks go for the Sir Galahad types, keep pushing it! You're
going to get that pussy yet.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
You can play all the silly word games you want. I'm more than familiar
with them, though, so I'm not fooled.
- Blue Rajah
:: Currently listening to You Turn Me On I'm a Radio, 1972, by Joni Mitchell, from "Hits"
Zapanaz
You keep working that, Greg, I can tell she's starting to give in,
you'll get in those panties yet.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
"Birds are the eyes of God." -- Shaman Leo
:: Currently listening to Swallowtail Live, 2003, by The Brian Jonestown Massacre, from "Tepid Peppermint Wonderland - A Retrospective (Disc 2)"
Gregory Hall
> On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 18:58:21 -0400, "Gregory Hall"
> <greg...@home.fake> wrote:
>
>>"Barbara Schwarz" <BarbaraSc...@excite.com> wrote in message
>>news:d2973f4e-f4bb-4d78...@m11g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>> Greg Hall is not a Scientologist and I doubt that he is a friend of
>>> Scientology. He is a Christian.
>>
>>
>>
>>I am a friend of Scientology and on their side against the extremists
>>though, of course, I don't accept all their teachings.
>>
>>P.S. Subject line corrected.
>
> You keep working that, Greg, I can tell she's starting to give in,
> you'll get in those panties yet.
It's not about getting into anybody's panties. It's about trying to lend a
well-meaning hand to somebody who is all alone and trying to fight a battle
beyond her means. It's about trying to convince her to not be so extreme
herself. It's about trying to save her soul from eternal damnation. (She's
rejected God and Jesus and is lost unless she changes her mind and repents.)
It's about being on the right side as anti-Scientology extremists are
nothing more than anti-religion extremists and, as such, they are diseased
individuals who need to be pushed back into the slime pit out of which they
crawled.
--
Gregory Hall
Rev. 11D Meow!
<greg...@home.fake> wrote:
>"Zapanaz" <http://joecosby.com/code/mail.pl?foo=@mindspring.com> wrote in
>message news:pqfvb55vo60ih6gim...@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 18:58:21 -0400, "Gregory Hall"
>> <greg...@home.fake> wrote:
>>
>>>"Barbara Schwarz" <BarbaraSc...@excite.com> wrote in message
>>>news:d2973f4e-f4bb-4d78...@m11g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>>> Greg Hall is not a Scientologist and I doubt that he is a friend of
>>>> Scientology. He is a Christian.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I am a friend of Scientology and on their side against the extremists
>>>though, of course, I don't accept all their teachings.
>>>
>>>P.S. Subject line corrected.
>>
>> You keep working that, Greg, I can tell she's starting to give in,
>> you'll get in those panties yet.
>
>
>It's not about getting into anybody's panties. It's about trying to lend a
>well-meaning hand to somebody who is all alone and trying to fight a battle
>beyond her means. It's about trying to convince her to not be so extreme
>herself. It's about trying to save her soul from eternal damnation. (She's
>rejected God and Jesus and is lost unless she changes her mind and repents.)
>It's about being on the right side as anti-Scientology extremists are
>nothing more than anti-religion extremists and, as such, they are diseased
>individuals who need to be pushed back into the slime pit out of which they
>crawled.
You forget the Holy Ghost up there in all that, Gregory Hall.
Though it was originally spelled WOOLY GHOST, but all those lame-ass
translations what purposely put so much whacked-out pure-d bullshit
crap in the bible to subjugate the masses even further done
fucked-it-all-up.
WOOLY GHOST Will Smite You Mightily for that transgression,
Bre'r Hall.
Zapanaz
<greg...@home.fake> wrote:
>"Zapanaz" <http://joecosby.com/code/mail.pl?foo=@mindspring.com> wrote in
>message news:pqfvb55vo60ih6gim...@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 18:58:21 -0400, "Gregory Hall"
>> <greg...@home.fake> wrote:
>>
>>>"Barbara Schwarz" <BarbaraSc...@excite.com> wrote in message
>>>news:d2973f4e-f4bb-4d78...@m11g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>>> Greg Hall is not a Scientologist and I doubt that he is a friend of
>>>> Scientology. He is a Christian.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I am a friend of Scientology and on their side against the extremists
>>>though, of course, I don't accept all their teachings.
>>>
>>>P.S. Subject line corrected.
>>
>> You keep working that, Greg, I can tell she's starting to give in,
>> you'll get in those panties yet.
>
>
>It's not about getting into anybody's panties.
Yeah obviously (wink)
>It's about trying to lend a
>well-meaning hand to somebody who is all alone and trying to fight a battle
>beyond her means. It's about trying to convince her to not be so extreme
>herself. It's about trying to save her soul from eternal damnation. (She's
>rejected God and Jesus and is lost unless she changes her mind and repents.)
>It's about being on the right side as anti-Scientology extremists are
>nothing more than anti-religion extremists and, as such, they are diseased
>individuals who need to be pushed back into the slime pit out of which they
>crawled.
Yeah that sounds like a well-thought-out plan.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
PRAISE BOB!
:: Currently listening to Love You To, 1966, by The Beatles, from "Revolver [Remaster 2009]"