Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

TO ANY GUTLESS WWP MODS PRESENT

1 view
Skip to first unread message

henri

unread,
Oct 18, 2009, 9:28:05 PM10/18/09
to
I am not remotely interested in clicking on that agreement to the TOS
again. I'm not doing it. I already agreed to it. And I didn't
violate a word in the POS TOS.

All I want from you is that you GUTLESS PINHEADS either BAN or INFRACT
me. When you do it, all I want is that you tell me what part of that
contract I violated and how I violated it, and why you're banning me.
I will NOT "sign" that contract again by clicking (which is the legal
effect of clicking it). I already did that.

I am entirely happy never to post on that site again. I just want
your explanation of the contractual violation you're alleging and what
I did that violated it. Feel free to post here, if you have a single
ball or ovary, what I did that justifies that bullshit.

I invited you openly to ban or infract me. You did neither. Instead,
you present me with the TOS screen again, asking me to agree to it.
Well, it's almost exactly the same TOS I already agreed to. So what
in it did I violate, how did I violate it, and are you going to
infract or ban me?

If you actually have the balls to say "We're infracting you because
you posted something that is completely true," go ahead. I WANT that.
I could USE that. Here's the true thing I posted:
http://www.lasvegasanonymous.org/forums/index.php?topic=1495.0
contains a discussion of an emergency in Las Vegas.

That URL *does* discuss an emergency in Las Vegas. That shit is TRUE.

So please, tell me that you've b& me because I told the truth at the
wrong time. I fucking dare you. Because if you think that's gonna
fly, you're goddamn retarded. People who actually read WWP to find
the truth about what's going on are gonna go elsewhere, as they
should, because you're a bunch of fucking idiots.

henri

unread,
Oct 18, 2009, 9:39:56 PM10/18/09
to
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:28:05 -0400, henri <he...@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:

Nevermind this post. I am very pleased to note that I actually AM
banned for posting an URL that any retard remotely interested in the
subject I posted about could have found.

Thanks, mods, for confirming my opinion of your extreme stupidity.

Enjoy your fail.

Kat

unread,
Oct 18, 2009, 9:44:30 PM10/18/09
to

There are reasons I don't visit that site unless I have to. Too much
icing from delicious caek has rotted more than one mod brain.

Jinkii

unread,
Oct 19, 2009, 7:07:38 AM10/19/09
to

turns out someone was posting on LVAnon's site that they were planning
on blowing up parts of the desert with M80s and pissy pants Moxon took
that as an invitation to stage a terrorist threat just like in the
sixties, it only took them 2 years to find someone they could set the
cops on.

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3216933

i agree the way they dealt with this was lame, we have some news, dont
talk about the news or you will get banned.

Jinkii

Jinkii

unread,
Oct 19, 2009, 7:12:14 AM10/19/09
to

henri

unread,
Oct 19, 2009, 8:15:25 AM10/19/09
to
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:07:38 -0700 (PDT), Jinkii
<jin...@googlemail.com> wrote:

>turns out someone was posting on LVAnon's site that they were planning
>on blowing up parts of the desert with M80s and pissy pants Moxon took
>that as an invitation to stage a terrorist threat just like in the
>sixties, it only took them 2 years to find someone they could set the
>cops on.

>http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3216933

I hope for the best outcome for the poor guy at the receiving end of
this bullshit. It seems like they probably got the wrong guy.

>i agree the way they dealt with this was lame, we have some news, dont
>talk about the news or you will get banned.

This is the kind of stupid episode that has happened every few years
for the last five decades or so in cult history, not something that
needed the Cone of Silence.

What amazes me is that people obviously actually GOT TOGETHER and
TALKED ABOUT IT and SPENT TIME to DECIDE that this was the way to
HANDLE something. I could easily see stupidity like this as the off
the cuff decision of one imbecile. It's kind of flabbergasting that
apparently not one person in the group said: "Hey, wait. . .isn't
this the dumbest idea anyone here ever had?" But whatever.

I'll probably stay away for a while even if I'm unbanned. Not because
I'm still angry by now, but because I should, at this point, be immune
to getting pissed off at Internet stupidity, and should calm the fuck
down. They shouldn't have bungled this so badly but I shouldn't have
flown off the handle either, and whatever, no real harm done. No
point in contributing further to the drama.

henri

unread,
Oct 19, 2009, 8:24:12 AM10/19/09
to
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:15:25 -0400, henri <he...@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:

>>http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3216933

>I hope for the best outcome for the poor guy at the receiving end of
>this bullshit. It seems like they probably got the wrong guy.

Looks more like there wasn't even a right guy to get.

0 new messages