Spank Your Children
Tracey12
they own your kids and can tell you what you can or cannot do with or
to them.
It is your right as a parent to control your kids the way you want.
The nasty bulldykes at CPS have overstepped their authority.
You have the absolute right as a parent to spank your children if you
so desire. It is your religious right to do so.
Many commiecrats are suggesting that state employees be "culturally
sensitive" to those they deal with.
What this means is kiss the tail of the illegal aliens you encounter
and accept their low life way of living as "culturally normal" for
them. But, why won't commiecrats accept the way Americans live?
Spanking your child has always been a part of American culture, yet
the commiecrats think they know better how to run your family. Spank
your children.
Alan Ferris
<tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>It is your right as a parent to control your kids the way you want.
Really.......so a parent who beats his child until it has broken bones
is ok.....what about those parents who poured boiling water down the
throat of their child, do you support them?
--
Ferrit
()'.'.'()
( (T) )
( ) . ( )
(")_(")
NotMe
"Tracey12" <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5831c226-4299-4ea1...@x10g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
Spoken like one that has limited experience with kids and less experience
with the CPS system and the law.
C...@prayforme.com
<tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
Children need discipline other wise they won't eat their peas, throw
tantrums and walk out of meetings when they don't get what they want.
Undisciplined children grow into adolescence and when hormones
rage/lust, the character parents have instilled either gives strength
or doesn't in free choice.
Left up to Liberals no Biblical discipline would become law while
Sharia law would be accepted as multi-cult tolerance.
CB
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJIQm_7YAUI&feature=related
Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) At Her Very Best
C...@prayforme.com
<hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 08:48:48 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
><tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>It is your right as a parent to control your kids the way you want.
>
>Really.......so a parent who beats his child until it has broken bones
>is ok.
Just because you do that doesn't mean others do
....what about those parents who poured boiling water down the
>throat of their child, do you support them?
Obama voters to be sure
Kenny McCormack
C...@PrayForMe.com <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:
...
>CB
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJIQm_7YAUI&feature=related
>Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) At Her Very Best
Is that the Chootspah one?
--
Windows 95 n. (Win-doze): A 32 bit extension to a 16 bit user interface for
an 8 bit operating system based on a 4 bit architecture from a 2 bit company
that can't stand 1 bit of competition.
Modern day upgrade --> Windows XP Professional x64: Windows is now a 64 bit
tweak of a 32 bit extension to a 16 bit user interface for an 8 bit
operating system based on a 4 bit architecture from a 2 bit company that
can't stand 1 bit of competition.
Tracey12
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 08:48:48 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
>
> >It is your right as a parent to control your kids the way you want.
>
> Really.......so a parent who beats his child until it has broken bones
> is ok.....what about those parents who poured boiling water down the
> throat of their child, do you support them?
>
> --
> Ferrit
>
> ()'.'.'()
> ( (T) )
> ( ) . ( )
> (")_(")
arent you one of the lost canadians in this group? mind your own
business.
Alan Ferris
<tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Jul 16, 11:04 am, Alan Ferris <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 08:48:48 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
>>
>> <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >It is your right as a parent to control your kids the way you want.
>>
>> Really.......so a parent who beats his child until it has broken bones
>> is ok.....what about those parents who poured boiling water down the
>> throat of their child, do you support them?
>arent you one of the lost canadians in this group? mind your own
>business.
No, just you being a fucking idiot again.
Patrick
news:5831c226-4299-4ea1...@x10g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
> they own your kids and can tell you what you can or cannot do with or
> to them.
> It is your right as a parent to control your kids the way you want.
> The nasty bulldykes at CPS have overstepped their authority.
> You have the absolute right as a parent to spank your children if you
> so desire. It is your religious right to do so.
If you are Casey Anthony, you have the right to murder your
child, place her in plastic bags and dispose of her body in a swamp.
First Post
<hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 08:48:48 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
><tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>It is your right as a parent to control your kids the way you want.
>
>Really.......so a parent who beats his child until it has broken bones
>is ok.....what about those parents who poured boiling water down the
>throat of their child, do you support them?
Typical liberal dickhead response. Always look to the extreme and
claim it is the norm.
So in your little tiny brain a spanking is the same as beating a child
to death.
Meanwhile in the years since corporal punishment has been outlawed,
instead of a couple of kids getting into the typical fistfight and
being sent to the principal for a couple of swats on the ass and then
sent back to class, we now have police officers stationed in virtually
all public schools and kids are now being hauled off to jail for the
same things that we used to just get a paddling for.
We now have a higher teen crime rate than ever before in history and
liberal morons still cry for even less punishment or responsibility on
the kids while blaming the parents for "not being able to control"
their brats.
George Kerby
On 7/16/11 12:28 PM, in article egi327h8bqlpahg8t...@4ax.com,
"Alan Ferris" <hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
And add a Lost Limey to the list: Fuck Off, Fairy!
C...@prayforme.com
(Kenny McCormack) wrote:
>In article <u0e327dop54um9kp7...@4ax.com>,
>C...@PrayForMe.com <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:
>...
>>CB
>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJIQm_7YAUI&feature=related
>>Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) At Her Very Best
>
>Is that the Chootspah one?
Huh?
C...@prayforme.com
wrote:
I'd like to know if that Sociopath ever got spanked from George
Anthony...I doubt it
Alan Ferris
I love it when poofs like you try to be all butch.
Tracey12
rs-lorenz-rdg
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 08:48:48 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
>
> <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >they own your kids and can tell you what you can or cannot do with or
> >to them.
>
> near you----that would be a good thing.
>
> >===============================================================
>
> The public debt on 9/30/1981 (Mr. Carter's last budget year) was
> $997,855,000,000.00.
>
> The public debt on 9/29/1989 (Mr. Reagan's last budget year) was
> $2,857,430,960,187.32.
>
> Mr. Reagan added $1,859,575,960,187.32 to the public debt.
>
> The public debt on 9/30/1993 (Mr. Bush's - the elder - last budget
> year) was $4,411,488,883,139.38.
>
> Mr. Bush added $1,554,057,922,952.06 to the public debt.
>
> The public debt on 9/30/2001 (Mr. Clinton's last budget year) was
> $5,807,463,412,200.06.
>
> Mr. Clinton added $1,395,974,529,060.68 to the public debt.
>
> The public debt on 9/30/2009 (Mr. Bush's last budget year) was
> $11,909,829,003,511.70.
>
> Mr. Bush added $6,102,365,591,311.64 to the public debt.
>
> The public debt on 3/3/2011 was $14,182,086,199,057.00.
>
> Mr. Obama has added $2,272,257,195,545.30 to the public debt.
>
> Of the $13.184 trillion dollar debt added since (and not including)
> Mr. Carter, the Republican administrations have added $9.516 trillion
> (72.2%) and the Democratic presidents have added $3.668 trillion
> (27.8%).
>
>
>
> > From 1994-2007--YOUR republicans created some of the WORST economic
> > and domestic policy in our history by deregulation, oversight failure,
> > and tax cuts, while kissing Bush's ass for everything.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
It is not just liberals who are anti-spank, or just conservatives who
are pro-Bible
Martin Luther King was spanked as a kid. He was liberal yet he was a
staunch believer in the Bible, and in many strong conservative values.
Plus, he will probably go down in history as one of the greatest
Americans.
Many modern Republicans are anti-spank, and some of tthem are
secularists -- and who knows, maybe a few atheist Republicans too.
Democrats tend to be more grass roots. The party of the lowly, the
hillbillies, the immigrants, the working class.
FDR came along, gave the farmers a righteous deal, and now most
farmers are RICH, with large federal payments keeping them rich.
Patrick
> Meanwhile in the years since corporal punishment has been outlawed,
> instead of a couple of kids getting into the typical fistfight and
> being sent to the principal for a couple of swats on the ass and then
> sent back to class, we now have police officers stationed in virtually
> all public schools and kids are now being hauled off to jail for the
> same things that we used to just get a paddling for.
> We now have a higher teen crime rate than ever before in history and
> liberal morons still cry for even less punishment or responsibility on
> the kids while blaming the parents for "not being able to control"
> their brats.
My daughter was assaulted by a third grade kid last year
and had to go to the hospital.
SilentOtto
Why do you rightards think it's fine for one person to physically
assault another?
Heh heh...
Lying racist rightard socialists...
Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.
Harold Burton
<c4a4f74c-2fe8-4a1d...@r9g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,
SilentOtto <silen...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 16, 11:48 am, Tracey12 <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Why do you rightards think it's fine for one person to physically
> assault another?
<http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/02/awful-union-thug-assaults-young-
conservative-tabitha-hale-at-rally-video/>
<http://biggovernment.com/jhoft/2011/02/25/more-union-thuggery-gop-candid
ate-marty-lamb-knocked-to-ground-by-union-thugs-video/>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3049ny1JczA
<http://www.conservativechristianonward.com/apps/blog/show/6284169-fox-ne
ws-report-receives-death-threats-gets-assaulted-by-protestors-at-wisconsi
n-union-hissy-fit>
<http://www.frugal-cafe.com/public_html/frugal-blog/frugal-cafe-blogzone/
2010/09/29/violence-hatred-and-thuggery-by-liberal-extremists-against-con
servatives-so-wheres-the-media-video/>
snicker
M. Gaddafi
prefer to spank the bared behinds of my neighbor's teenaged
daughters. Usually without permission, but followed by much
emission(s).
Sword Broken
"Tracey12" <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5831c226-4299-4ea1...@x10g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On Fox ?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14166162
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12296392
This is from aus.politics just for you:
> Saudi Prince Al-waleed bin Talal who holds seven per cent shares in News
> Corp made his position clear that she should leave. 'For sure she has to
> go,' he told Newsnight 'you bet she has to go.'
>
> I guess when the guy who provides the cash backing with the ready cash
> says you're done, you're done.
>
>
> Read more:
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2015067/Rebekah-Brooks-resigns-
head-News-International-refuses-apologise.html#ixzz1SAn9tfUe
There is nothing wrong with News Ltd. They live up to their name in
all respects.
(please pay attention to "Ltd." - they are limiting news for morons who
believe everything on Fox)
URL Source: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/07/13/a-murdoch-note/
By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor
Today the British papers not owned by Rupert Murdoch "rumored" that he
might be jailed. Americans, even Brits, have little or no idea what
is at risk here. There is simply no one who can report it when the
individual who, not only controls the world's largest news
organization turns out to be, well, what?
Who is Rupert Murdoch?
What he is not is an Australian "right wing" billionaire. Murdoch,
though born in Australia is an Israeli citizen and Jewish. Why is
this important?
Murdoch is now admitted to have controlled the political systems in
Britain and America for two decades. He has had the power to choose
national leaders, make policy, pass laws at will. Where did the power
come from?
We now know it came from spying, blackmail, bribery and propaganda.
What is his agenda? Ah, there's the rub.
Was it about selling newspapers using scandals or spying in the name
of Israel to push Britain and the United States into wars for Israel?
There is a simple answer.
Murdoch's primary motivation isn't even that he is "for Israel."
Murdoch is, perhaps, the most influential Israeli, more powerful than
Netanyahu. The problem with that is that his beliefs are what we call
"ultra-nationalist."
This makes him a threat. Ultra-nationalists are known to support
wars, plan terrorist acts, manipulate populations into strife and
racism, foster fear and panic, even financial ruin.
What are we describing here?
If you aren't totally brain dead, you realize I am describing Sean
Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh and Fox News.
Murdoch owns Fox News and so much else you may not have a time to look
at the list. If he doesn't own it he doesn't want it.
Fox is a network and Murdoch, owning so many newspapers across America
and being a foreigner shouldn't be able to control such a thing. How
did he do it?
Reagan "appointed" Murdoch an American citizen. Murdoch promised to
have Fox News support Republicans and say whatever was needed, no
matter how false, how stupid or, as we have seen now for decades, how
genuinely evil.
What he really did, however, was use Fox as a base to allow Israel to
run spy operations.
These went two ways:
1. Israel got lots of military technology and secrets they could sell
to America's enemies for money. This is good "Murdoch" business
sense, as we all see now.
2. Murdoch helped Israel gain control of congress. They literally
run the United States. The tools? As in Britain, bribery and
blackmail, police, military and congress.
No surprises for anyone.
Murdoch has, in fact, engineered the last 20 plus years of American
history, picking politicians, throwing elections, establishing
policies. Were the decisions his own?
I don't think so. I think Murdoch represents a group, mostly
financial, making up the Rothschild family, the Federal Reserve Banks
and organized crime.
There is an Israeli or Jewish aspect to some of this but not in the
sense of being "pro" or "anti" Semitic. The Murdoch empire, married
to the "lily white" "no Jews allowed" Republican Party simply put
their own very powerful spin on the good old "New World Order,"
pushing it into drug running, arms and human trafficking, manipulated
international currencies and debt on a massive scale, ran America and
the European Union into economic collapse, worked with oil companies
to set up price fixing schemes.
This is what Murdoch and his friends have done, all the while pointing
their fingers at Osama bin Laden and the evil "liberals."
They divided Britain, starting at first as "conservatives" and then
changed to "liberals." What they did in Britain is undermine legal
government, destroy the nation and the public's trust in the
government, Blair, Cameron, it doesn't matter, Murdoch chose both and
ran and runs both like hand puppets as he did with Bush and his
friends.
The ideas are simple. Bilk the countries out of every last cent, use
a portion to bribe or blackmail politicians, buy police and get even
more money.
Then you lie to the people, give them enemies to hate, arrange wars
for them to fight and stand back and watch them destroy themselves.
Are there people really this evil?
Yes there are, Murdoch, the gang at his companies, the gang at Fox
News, the folks in the US called "neocons," the Israeli lobby in the
US, the ADL, AIPAC and the Likudist faction in Israel run by
Netanyahu.
These folks hate the United States.
A similar group hate Britain. Australia has their own, he runs that
place entirely, right into the ground. He also runs Germany, Canada,
he runs much of what was once the "free world."
Am I describing Satan?
Pretty much.
His strongest advocates, those who have stood with his thieves and
liars against all that is decent, all that is good, all that is right
is the Evangelical and "Zionist" communities in the United States.
They were and are the "fertile ground" for his message of hate and
deceit.
Who does Murdoch claim to hate?
Muslims for sure, they are all bad. Everything he touches in his
hundreds of publications and TV shows or the phony news his gang of
cutthroats create, hate of Muslims is always on top. This pleases his
Israeli friends. If things keep going as they are, he may need to
hide out there and Israel will always protect him, maybe plow down a
few Palestinian homes to give him a grand estate. After all, Muslims
are an easy target, living in petty dictatorships run by thieves who
we have now learned have always run to Washington and Tel Aviv for
orders.
Take out a second. Think the word "Palestinian." Do you also think
"terrorist?" Do you see a child being killed by an Israeli helicopter
or innocent people killed by a TV villain, almost invariably played by
Jewish actors, perhaps a sick "inside joke" of Murdoch's.
The Islamic people of the world have been played, exploited and
crushed since 1919. History will show it carefully planned and
financed by a certain European banking family, one that 6 years
earlier had established an illegal banking system in the US.
Learn about the real Balfour Declaration and how it was gotten through
blackmail, learn who wrote it and to whom it was sent.
The story reads exactly like the things that are coming out in Britain
day after day.
Murdoch tells his followers to hate "smart people." There has to be
fear of the educated, the "elites." You can't have rampant racism and
blind ignorance until you destroy public trust in the natural leaders,
until you destroy real culture and replace it with mechanized music,
scandal mongering, dirty sex and endless conspiracies.
Murdoch is the real king of conspiracy theories.
Look at the endless list of wild accusations that came from Fox
alone. Then look at the others, the accusations, the wild and insane
things that were written into history but likely planned by Murdoch.
9/11 probably had Murdoch's hand in it as did the London bombings on
7/7.
There could be no great conspiracy without control of the news.
Now we find the news itself controlled the governments and may well
have written the scripts to the wars, the rigged elections, the acts
of terror and the misdirection that sent America into a decade of
cruel and useless bloodletting after terror groups that never existed
in the first place.
Now, today, as our British cousins are reeling in the revelations that
their government for decades has not been their own, a diseased hybrid
of crazy old man, Israeli spies and the paid stooges that the people
thought were serving them..
And it goes on in America, full blast, Murdoch and his creatures,
planning the future of America.
One of his creatures is Boehner.
Another is Palin.
Then there is Gingrich.
There was the entire Bush administration.
But, to get to the dark heart of evil, first you look at Fox News.
Bible Studies with Satan
> Spank your children.
Pull down your hot teenage daughter's panties and spank her.
--
Ezekiel 23:20
Buster Norris
"Why do you always LIE?"
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:03:07 -0700 (PDT), SilentOtto
<silen...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Jun 17, 10:24 am, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>> There isn't enough land on the planet for windmills to power us, there
>> isn't enough land or roof space on the planet for solar to power us,
>> and there isn't enough land on the planet to grow whatever biofuel
>> source can be dreamed up to power us.
>Germany...
>Small, cloudy Germany...
>Is slated to get 25% of their power from solar by 2020.
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/04/AR2007050402466.html
You said: "Germany... is slated to get 25% of their power from solar
by 2020."
Your cite says: "For now, the technology remains expensive and barely
registers as a fraction of total energy production -- less than 0.5
percent. The government hopes to increase that figure to 3 percent by
2020."
YOU have been CAUGHT LYING.
Posted from:
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/
Tracey12
Tracey12
Isn't it funny how liberals endorse killing your children, but they
want to put parents in prison for correcting their children by
spanking? If the mother had aborted her child, liberals would have
paid for the abortion. If she has the child and spanks it, they put
the mother in prison.
Bible Studies with Satan
> On Jul 16, 10:48�am, Tracey12 <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> As we have seen over the past few weeks, the commiecrats think that
>> they own your kids and can tell you what you can or cannot do with or
>> to them.
>>
>> It is your right as a parent to control your kids the way you want.
>> The nasty bulldykes at CPS have overstepped their authority.
>>
>> You have the absolute right as a parent to spank your children if you
>> so desire. �It is your religious right to do so.
>>
>> Many commiecrats are suggesting that state employees be "culturally
>> sensitive" to those they deal with.
>>
>> What this means is kiss the tail of the illegal aliens you encounter
>> and accept their low life way of living as "culturally normal" for
>> them. �But, why won't commiecrats accept the way Americans live?
>>
>> Spanking your child has always been a part of American culture, yet
>> the commiecrats think they know better how to run your family. �Spank
>> your children.
>
> Isn't it funny how liberals endorse killing your children, but they
> want to put parents in prison for correcting their children by
> spanking?
Never heard of such a thing. Where did you get that idea?
> If the mother had aborted her child, liberals would have
> paid for the abortion. If she has the child and spanks it, they put
> the mother in prison.
--
Ezekiel 23:20
Paul Duca (tomservo56954@comcast.net)
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 08:48:48 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
>
>
>
> <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >As we have seen over the past few weeks, the commiecrats think that
> >they own your kids and can tell you what you can or cannot do with or
> >to them.
>
> >It is your right as a parent to control your kids the way you want.
> >The nasty bulldykes at CPS have overstepped their authority.
>
> >You have the absolute right as a parent to spank your children if you
> >so desire. It is your religious right to do so.
>
> >Many commiecrats are suggesting that state employees be "culturally
> >sensitive" to those they deal with.
>
> >What this means is kiss the tail of the illegal aliens you encounter
> >and accept their low life way of living as "culturally normal" for
> >them. But, why won't commiecrats accept the way Americans live?
>
> >Spanking your child has always been a part of American culture, yet
> >the commiecrats think they know better how to run your family. Spank
> >your children.
>
> Children need discipline other wise they won't eat their peas, throw
> tantrums and walk out of meetings when they don't get what they want.
>
>
didn't want to deal with them.
Paul
Paul Duca (tomservo56954@comcast.net)
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 13:29:19 -0400, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com>
> wrote:
>
> >"Tracey12" <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:5831c226-4299-4ea1...@x10g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
> >> As we have seen over the past few weeks, the commiecrats think that
> >> they own your kids and can tell you what you can or cannot do with or
> >> to them.
> >> It is your right as a parent to control your kids the way you want.
> >> The nasty bulldykes at CPS have overstepped their authority.
> >> You have the absolute right as a parent to spank your children if you
> >> so desire. It is your religious right to do so.
>
> >If you are Casey Anthony, you have the right to murder your
> >child, place her in plastic bags and dispose of her body in a swamp.
>
> I'd like to know if that Sociopath ever got spanked from George
> Anthony...I doubt it
Maybe he liked it too much and went as far as Tracey tells us every
Christian man is required to on a young girl.
Paul
Paul Duca (tomservo56954@comcast.net)
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 08:48:48 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
>
> <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >they own your kids and can tell you what you can or cannot do with or
> >to them.
>
> near you----that would be a good thing.
>
Tracey doesn't like CPS because then tend to take away young girls
being sexually molested by adult males....defying the rules of God and
country that REQUIRE men to do that?
Can't find those rules? Ask Tracey....he can quote them chapter and
verse.
Paul
Paul Duca (tomservo56954@comcast.net)
> Spank your children...especially if they are hot young girls without panties.
Buster Norris
"Why do you always LIE?"
Liars are exposed:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:55:13 -0700, Bible Studies with Satan
<bi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Patriot Games wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:24:46 -0700, fi...@ajaz.com wrote:
>>>On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:13:00 -0400, Patriot Games
>>><Pat...@america.com> wrote:
>>>>You exist now only as my personal toilet.
>>>Crazy bats need a toilet?
>>>Why not Hang out in some belfry somewhere?
>> X-No-Archive: yes
>> Go fuck yourself.
>Hey, Mr. amateur script kiddie!
What the hell does that mean?
>You have to put "X-No-Archive: yes" in the
>header in order for it to work.
From: fi...@ajaz.com
Message-ID: <mbciq59hv3nd2cq4i...@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
X-Complaints-To: ab...@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
From: Patriot Games <Pat...@america.com>
Message-ID: <embkq5dl30pdb2ou7...@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
In order for WHAT to work?
You'll notice that we use the SAME Newsreader...
Oops! Caught LYING, Again:
"Some service providers archive every message that is transmitted.
Check this box to prevent such a service from archiving any of the
messages you post in any group by adding an "X-No-Archive:yes" header
field to the message. (To see this field in the Message pane, select
Show All Header Fields from the View menu.) Note: This is a request.
Users can ignore this header and archive your message anyway."
Forté Agent Introduction - Version 6.0
>Dumbass.
Proven LIAR!
Alan Ferris
Never knew they called the local pervert Grandmother, but it does
explain a lot about CB.
Tracey12
> As we have seen over the past few weeks, the commiecrats think that
> they own your kids and can tell you what you can or cannot do with or
> to them.
>
> It is your right as a parent to control your kids the way you want.
> The nasty bulldykes at CPS have overstepped their authority.
>
> You have the absolute right as a parent to spank your children if you
> so desire. It is your religious right to do so.
>
> Many commiecrats are suggesting that state employees be "culturally
> sensitive" to those they deal with.
>
> What this means is kiss the tail of the illegal aliens you encounter
> and accept their low life way of living as "culturally normal" for
> them. But, why won't commiecrats accept the way Americans live?
>
> Spanking your child has always been a part of American culture, yet
> the commiecrats think they know better how to run your family. Spank
> your children.
Spanking your children is every parent's right. The state does not
own you or your children. It cannot tell you how to control your
children. Yet, the thuggish commiecrats in DC and around the country
are working to enact more and more laws that turn you and your family
into employees, or even slaves who are allowed to go to work and then
return home, but little else is legal. Yes, you may watch sports and
drink a little beer, but be warned that the heavy hand of government
is ready to issue you a DUI, or remove your kids from your home should
you smoke, or drink "too much".
How bad are things getting? Its not unusual for American Communistic
Democrats to look across the pond with great love of the socialist
European condition. In Wales, a western portion of England, for those
of you in Rio Linda, a new law is being considered: If you are caught
lighting up or smoking a cigarette in your vehicle, the government
will swoop in and issue you a ticket.
CommieCrats here in the USA have wanted laws that fine or imprison
parents who smoke in their homes. How would they know? HOME
INSPECTIONS, of course.
If given the time and money, your government will put you in chains
for some cause. That is the nature of all governments that have ever
been created. Only when We the People take a very powerful stand
against out of control government does liberty return as well as
common sense. Until such time, ever more intrusive government will
find a way to put its jack boot on your neck.