info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex
9 views
Skip to first unread message
default
Dec 25, 2011, 11:07:21 AM12/25/11
to
Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
For centuries, Christianity has had an exceptionally unhealthy
fixation on sex, to the exclusion of almost everything else (except
power, money, and the infliction of cruelty). This stems from the
numerous "thou shalt nots" relating to sex in the Bible. That the Ten
Commandments contain a commandment forbidding the coveting of one’s
neighbor’s wife, but do not even mention slavery, torture, or
cruelty—which were abundantly common in the time the Commandments were
written— speaks volumes about their writer’s preoccupation with sex
(and women as property).
Today, judging from the pronouncements of many Christian leaders, one
would think that "morality" consists solely of what one does in one’s
bedroom. The Catholic Church is the prime example here, with its moral
pronouncements rarely going beyond the matters of birth control and
abortion (and with its moral emphasis seemingly entirely on those
matters). Also note that the official Catholic view of sex—that it’s
for the purpose of procreation only—reduces human sexual relations to
those of brood animals. For more than a century the Catholic Church
has also been the driving force behind efforts to prohibit access to
birth control devices and information—to everyone, not just Catholics.
The Catholic Church, however, is far from alone in its sick obsession
with sex. The current Christian hate campaign against homosexuals is
another prominent manifestation of this perverse preoccupation. Even
at this writing, condemnation of "sodomites" from church pulpits is
still very, very common—with Christian clergymen wringing their hands
as they piously proclaim that their words of hate have nothing to do
with gay bashings and the murder of gays.
Taken from 20 Reasons to Abandon Christianity
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vatican/esp_vatican32.htm
1.
Christianity is based on fear
2.
Christianity preys on the innocent
3.
Christianity is based on dishonesty
4.
Christianity is extremely egocentric
5.
Christianity breeds arrogance, a chosen-people mentality
6.
Christianity breeds authoritarianism
7.
Christianity is cruel
8.
Christianity is anti-intellectual, anti-scientific
9.
Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with
sex
10.
Christianity produces sexual misery
11.
Christianity has an exceedingly narrow, legalistic view
of morality
12.
Christianity encourages acceptance of real evils while
focusing on imaginary evils
13.
Christianity depreciates the natural world
14.
Christianity models hierarchical, authoritarian
organization
15.
Christianity sanctions slavery
16.
Christianity is misogynistic
17.
Christianity is homophobic
18.
The Bible is not a reliable guide to Christ's teachings
19.
The Bible is riddled with contradictions
20.
Christianity borrowed its central myths and ceremonies
from other ancient religions
--
For centuries, Christianity has had an exceptionally unhealthy
fixation on sex, to the exclusion of almost everything else (except
power, money, and the infliction of cruelty). This stems from the
numerous "thou shalt nots" relating to sex in the Bible. That the Ten
Commandments contain a commandment forbidding the coveting of one’s
neighbor’s wife, but do not even mention slavery, torture, or
cruelty—which were abundantly common in the time the Commandments were
written— speaks volumes about their writer’s preoccupation with sex
(and women as property).
Today, judging from the pronouncements of many Christian leaders, one
would think that "morality" consists solely of what one does in one’s
bedroom. The Catholic Church is the prime example here, with its moral
pronouncements rarely going beyond the matters of birth control and
abortion (and with its moral emphasis seemingly entirely on those
matters). Also note that the official Catholic view of sex—that it’s
for the purpose of procreation only—reduces human sexual relations to
those of brood animals. For more than a century the Catholic Church
has also been the driving force behind efforts to prohibit access to
birth control devices and information—to everyone, not just Catholics.
The Catholic Church, however, is far from alone in its sick obsession
with sex. The current Christian hate campaign against homosexuals is
another prominent manifestation of this perverse preoccupation. Even
at this writing, condemnation of "sodomites" from church pulpits is
still very, very common—with Christian clergymen wringing their hands
as they piously proclaim that their words of hate have nothing to do
with gay bashings and the murder of gays.
Taken from 20 Reasons to Abandon Christianity
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vatican/esp_vatican32.htm
1.
Christianity is based on fear
2.
Christianity preys on the innocent
3.
Christianity is based on dishonesty
4.
Christianity is extremely egocentric
5.
Christianity breeds arrogance, a chosen-people mentality
6.
Christianity breeds authoritarianism
7.
Christianity is cruel
8.
Christianity is anti-intellectual, anti-scientific
9.
Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with
sex
10.
Christianity produces sexual misery
11.
Christianity has an exceedingly narrow, legalistic view
of morality
12.
Christianity encourages acceptance of real evils while
focusing on imaginary evils
13.
Christianity depreciates the natural world
14.
Christianity models hierarchical, authoritarian
organization
15.
Christianity sanctions slavery
16.
Christianity is misogynistic
17.
Christianity is homophobic
18.
The Bible is not a reliable guide to Christ's teachings
19.
The Bible is riddled with contradictions
20.
Christianity borrowed its central myths and ceremonies
from other ancient religions
--
W.T.S.
Dec 25, 2011, 11:47:05 AM12/25/11
to
In article <d8ief75kfmq9m2iia...@4ax.com>,
def...@nowhere.net says...
> neighbor?s wife, but do not even mention slavery, torture, or
> cruelty?which were abundantly common in the time the Commandments were
> written? speaks volumes about their writer?s preoccupation with sex
> for the purpose of procreation only?reduces human sexual relations to
Very excellent points, thanks!
Abortion and sterilization, they save the lives, health and futures of
women and men alike!
>
http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/print/14481
>
http://tinyurl.com/3j3fkch
>
http://www.egalitarian.biz/Plan-B--Remedy-of-a-Lifetime.html
>
http://www.thelizlibrary.org/liz/004.htm
def...@nowhere.net says...
>
> Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
>
> For centuries, Christianity has had an exceptionally unhealthy
> fixation on sex, to the exclusion of almost everything else (except
> power, money, and the infliction of cruelty). This stems from the
> numerous "thou shalt nots" relating to sex in the Bible. That the Ten
> Commandments contain a commandment forbidding the coveting of one?s
> Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
>
> For centuries, Christianity has had an exceptionally unhealthy
> fixation on sex, to the exclusion of almost everything else (except
> power, money, and the infliction of cruelty). This stems from the
> numerous "thou shalt nots" relating to sex in the Bible. That the Ten
> neighbor?s wife, but do not even mention slavery, torture, or
> cruelty?which were abundantly common in the time the Commandments were
> written? speaks volumes about their writer?s preoccupation with sex
> (and women as property).
>
> Today, judging from the pronouncements of many Christian leaders, one
> would think that "morality" consists solely of what one does in one?s
>
> Today, judging from the pronouncements of many Christian leaders, one
> bedroom. The Catholic Church is the prime example here, with its moral
> pronouncements rarely going beyond the matters of birth control and
> abortion (and with its moral emphasis seemingly entirely on those
> matters). Also note that the official Catholic view of sex?that it?s
> pronouncements rarely going beyond the matters of birth control and
> abortion (and with its moral emphasis seemingly entirely on those
> for the purpose of procreation only?reduces human sexual relations to
> those of brood animals. For more than a century the Catholic Church
> has also been the driving force behind efforts to prohibit access to
> birth control devices and information?to everyone, not just Catholics.
> has also been the driving force behind efforts to prohibit access to
>
> The Catholic Church, however, is far from alone in its sick obsession
> with sex. The current Christian hate campaign against homosexuals is
> another prominent manifestation of this perverse preoccupation. Even
> at this writing, condemnation of "sodomites" from church pulpits is
> still very, very common?with Christian clergymen wringing their hands
> The Catholic Church, however, is far from alone in its sick obsession
> with sex. The current Christian hate campaign against homosexuals is
> another prominent manifestation of this perverse preoccupation. Even
> at this writing, condemnation of "sodomites" from church pulpits is
Abortion and sterilization, they save the lives, health and futures of
women and men alike!
>
http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/print/14481
>
http://tinyurl.com/3j3fkch
>
http://www.egalitarian.biz/Plan-B--Remedy-of-a-Lifetime.html
>
http://www.thelizlibrary.org/liz/004.htm
Christopher A. Lee
Dec 25, 2011, 11:51:55 AM12/25/11
to
On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 11:07:21 -0500, default <def...@nowhere.net>
wrote:
> Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
Because its founder, the man who turned it from a minor Jewish sect
into a religion for the Mediterranean gentiles, Saul/Paul was a
misogynist.
But don't forget, in those days they didn't have contraception, basic
medical treatment etc and women needed to be maried young kept
pregnant as long as they survived so that enough children would live
to become adults.
Look up Lucretia Borgia in Wikipedia for an example of this just a few
hundred years ago.
Thankfully times have changed. I can't imagine the woman I love being
anything but a best friend for life rather than a brood mare.
That is half the story, and is behind the the Jewish marriage laws
including about when a woman is clean and unclean so the couple are at
their horniest when she is fertile.
But the Jews regarded sex as beautiful as long as it was "legal", eg
the Song of Solomon.
Paul however had hangups about both women and sex which he passed on
to the church he founded.
It makes one wonder why.
wrote:
> Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
into a religion for the Mediterranean gentiles, Saul/Paul was a
misogynist.
But don't forget, in those days they didn't have contraception, basic
medical treatment etc and women needed to be maried young kept
pregnant as long as they survived so that enough children would live
to become adults.
Look up Lucretia Borgia in Wikipedia for an example of this just a few
hundred years ago.
Thankfully times have changed. I can't imagine the woman I love being
anything but a best friend for life rather than a brood mare.
That is half the story, and is behind the the Jewish marriage laws
including about when a woman is clean and unclean so the couple are at
their horniest when she is fertile.
But the Jews regarded sex as beautiful as long as it was "legal", eg
the Song of Solomon.
Paul however had hangups about both women and sex which he passed on
to the church he founded.
It makes one wonder why.
Patrick
Dec 25, 2011, 1:25:31 PM12/25/11
to
"default" <def...@nowhere.net> wrote
18. The Bible is not a reliable guide to Christ's teachings
+ What is a reliable guide?
18. The Bible is not a reliable guide to Christ's teachings
Patrick
Dec 25, 2011, 1:34:14 PM12/25/11
to
"default" <def...@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:d8ief75kfmq9m2iia...@4ax.com...
have it all the time. If all you see is a fixation on sex, then perhaps
it is you who has this morbid preoccupation.
news:d8ief75kfmq9m2iia...@4ax.com...
> Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
> For centuries, Christianity has had an exceptionally unhealthy
> fixation on sex, to the exclusion of almost everything else
The only people preoccupied with sex are those who feel they must
> For centuries, Christianity has had an exceptionally unhealthy
> fixation on sex, to the exclusion of almost everything else
have it all the time. If all you see is a fixation on sex, then perhaps
it is you who has this morbid preoccupation.
Patrick
Dec 25, 2011, 1:36:13 PM12/25/11
to
"default" <def...@nowhere.net> wrote in ...
> Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
Christianity has allowed people to find happiness and self
fulfillment. The Founding Fathers saw the critical connection:
They pledged their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor to defend
the self-evident truths "that all men are created equal, that
they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,
that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness."
Non-Christians certainly don't believe in these principles.
John Baker
Dec 25, 2011, 3:01:53 PM12/25/11
to
> Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
Or more accurately, Christians have a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation
with other people's sex lives.
panamfloyd@hotmail.com rade
Dec 25, 2011, 3:26:54 PM12/25/11
to
On Dec 25, 1:36 pm, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com> wrote:
> "default" <defa...@nowhere.net> wrote in ...
snip
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/Member, Knights of BAAWA!
> "default" <defa...@nowhere.net> wrote in ...
>
> > Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
>
> Christianity has allowed people to find happiness and self
> fulfillment.
So has heroin. Were you trying to make a point here?
> > Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
>
> Christianity has allowed people to find happiness and self
> fulfillment.
snip
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/Member, Knights of BAAWA!
Faline
Dec 25, 2011, 3:50:37 PM12/25/11
to
"Christopher A. Lee" <ca...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:tckef7ha3su8d0jo0...@4ax.com...
Patrick
Dec 25, 2011, 4:08:15 PM12/25/11
to
"Faline" <...@......> wrote in message
news:jd82an$sn3$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
Paul's Letter to the Ephesians really upsets folks, particularly women. In
it St. Paul wrote: Wives should be subject to their husbands as to the Lord,
since, as Christ is head of the Church and saves the whole body, so is a
husband the head of his wife; and as the Church is subject to Christ, so
should wives be to their husbands, in everything. Husbands should love their
wives, just as Christ loved the Church and sacrificed himself for her . . .
What is overlooked is the burden laid on husbands to sacrifice themselves
for the sake of their wives. The thought ends with St. Paul declaring: "This
is why a man leaves his father and mother and becomes attached to his wife,
and the two become one flesh."
As for being subject, the verse just before "Wives should be subject to
their husbands ...." is this: Be subject to one another out of reverence for
Christ. St Paul gets a bad rap. He was not a "woman hater" as some have so
superficially claimed. Quite the opposite. In St. Paul's thinking, the wife
represents the Church and men should sacrifice themselves for their wives as
Christ did for His bride, the Church. That is hardly the theology of a woman
hater!
Once again this demonstrates the problem many bible-quoters have; they fail
to see their bible quotes in the full contexts that surround them.
http://www.eons.com/groups/topic/1682217-Did-St-Paul-Hate-Women-
news:jd82an$sn3$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> "Christopher A. Lee" <ca...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>> , default <def...@nowhere.net>>> wrote:
>>
>>> Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
>>
>>> Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
>> Paul however had hangups about both women and sex which he passed on
>> to the church he founded.
>>
>> It makes one wonder why.
>
> Not all gay men despise women, but Paul, a homosexual, sure did.
----------------------
>> to the church he founded.
>>
>> It makes one wonder why.
>
> Not all gay men despise women, but Paul, a homosexual, sure did.
Paul's Letter to the Ephesians really upsets folks, particularly women. In
it St. Paul wrote: Wives should be subject to their husbands as to the Lord,
since, as Christ is head of the Church and saves the whole body, so is a
husband the head of his wife; and as the Church is subject to Christ, so
should wives be to their husbands, in everything. Husbands should love their
wives, just as Christ loved the Church and sacrificed himself for her . . .
What is overlooked is the burden laid on husbands to sacrifice themselves
for the sake of their wives. The thought ends with St. Paul declaring: "This
is why a man leaves his father and mother and becomes attached to his wife,
and the two become one flesh."
As for being subject, the verse just before "Wives should be subject to
their husbands ...." is this: Be subject to one another out of reverence for
Christ. St Paul gets a bad rap. He was not a "woman hater" as some have so
superficially claimed. Quite the opposite. In St. Paul's thinking, the wife
represents the Church and men should sacrifice themselves for their wives as
Christ did for His bride, the Church. That is hardly the theology of a woman
hater!
Once again this demonstrates the problem many bible-quoters have; they fail
to see their bible quotes in the full contexts that surround them.
http://www.eons.com/groups/topic/1682217-Did-St-Paul-Hate-Women-
Patrick
Dec 25, 2011, 4:09:44 PM12/25/11
to
<panam...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:20bf63c1-6206-4202...@n39g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
+ And then maybe you can grasp my point.
+ Dipshit.
news:20bf63c1-6206-4202...@n39g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 25, 1:36 pm, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com> wrote:
> "default" <defa...@nowhere.net> wrote in ...
>
> > Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
>
> Christianity has allowed people to find happiness and self
> fulfillment.
So has heroin. Were you trying to make a point here?
snip
+ Yes. Go back and read the entire post.
> "default" <defa...@nowhere.net> wrote in ...
>
> > Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
>
> Christianity has allowed people to find happiness and self
> fulfillment.
So has heroin. Were you trying to make a point here?
snip
+ And then maybe you can grasp my point.
+ Dipshit.
Patrick
Dec 25, 2011, 4:10:32 PM12/25/11
to
"John Baker" <nu...@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:k70ff7p9bh2difdrc...@4ax.com...
We don't care about YOUR sex life, until you try
to brag about it. Then we just want you to shaddup.
news:k70ff7p9bh2difdrc...@4ax.com...
to brag about it. Then we just want you to shaddup.
Christopher A. Lee
Dec 25, 2011, 5:15:30 PM12/25/11
to
panamfloyd@hotmail.com rade
Dec 25, 2011, 6:15:32 PM12/25/11
to
On Dec 25, 4:09 pm, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com> wrote:
> <panamfl...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Fathers" and atheists not caring about social justice. You're nothing
if not predictable, Patti.
> + And then maybe you can grasp my point.
The only point you seem to have made is that you're still willfully
ignorant of life in general, and US history in particular.
> + Dipshit.
Ooooh, testy! What's the matter, Patti? Nothing but ties for Xmas this
year?
-PF, Atl.
#2015/KoBAAWA!
> <panamfl...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:20bf63c1-6206-4202...@n39g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 25, 1:36 pm, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com> wrote:
>
> > "default" <defa...@nowhere.net> wrote in ...
>
> > > Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
>
> > Christianity has allowed people to find happiness and self
> > fulfillment.
>
> So has heroin. Were you trying to make a point here?
> snip
>
> + Yes. Go back and read the entire post.
I did. Nothing more than the usual lies about the US' "Founding
> news:20bf63c1-6206-4202...@n39g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 25, 1:36 pm, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com> wrote:
>
> > "default" <defa...@nowhere.net> wrote in ...
>
> > > Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
>
> > Christianity has allowed people to find happiness and self
> > fulfillment.
>
> So has heroin. Were you trying to make a point here?
> snip
>
> + Yes. Go back and read the entire post.
Fathers" and atheists not caring about social justice. You're nothing
if not predictable, Patti.
> + And then maybe you can grasp my point.
ignorant of life in general, and US history in particular.
> + Dipshit.
Ooooh, testy! What's the matter, Patti? Nothing but ties for Xmas this
year?
-PF, Atl.
#2015/KoBAAWA!
Patrick
Dec 25, 2011, 7:35:54 PM12/25/11
to
<panam...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:90db89da-3d32-4d7b...@32g2000yqp.googlegroups.com...
Olrik
Dec 25, 2011, 11:52:03 PM12/25/11
to
Olrik
Dec 25, 2011, 11:56:49 PM12/25/11
to
default
Dec 26, 2011, 9:07:24 AM12/26/11
to
Patrick
Dec 26, 2011, 9:08:18 AM12/26/11
to
"Olrik" <olri...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:jd8uqi$7hc$3...@dont-email.me...
Because you seem to be the one preoccupied with sex.
Grow up.
news:jd8uqi$7hc$3...@dont-email.me...
Grow up.
Kenny McCormack
Dec 26, 2011, 10:06:49 AM12/26/11
to
In article <nLWdnbXgb5c78WrT...@posted.localnet>,
Funny.
--
Windows 95 n. (Win-doze): A 32 bit extension to a 16 bit user interface for
an 8 bit operating system based on a 4 bit architecture from a 2 bit company
that can't stand 1 bit of competition.
Modern day upgrade --> Windows XP Professional x64: Windows is now a 64 bit
tweak of a 32 bit extension to a 16 bit user interface for an 8 bit
operating system based on a 4 bit architecture from a 2 bit company that
can't stand 1 bit of competition.
--
Windows 95 n. (Win-doze): A 32 bit extension to a 16 bit user interface for
an 8 bit operating system based on a 4 bit architecture from a 2 bit company
that can't stand 1 bit of competition.
Modern day upgrade --> Windows XP Professional x64: Windows is now a 64 bit
tweak of a 32 bit extension to a 16 bit user interface for an 8 bit
operating system based on a 4 bit architecture from a 2 bit company that
can't stand 1 bit of competition.
ilbe...@gmail.com
Dec 26, 2011, 10:47:18 AM12/26/11
to
healthy construct and rules for proper sexuality .... and it is only
when the populace decides to handle sexuality AS THEY FEEL in an
uncontrolled manner...do we see the terrible consequences we can now
measure in our society by way of the present STD epidemic (33 STD's
finding a home amongst some 60,000,000 adult Americans with
15,000,000 new cases added per annum ... of which many thousands have
died from) in addition to walk in murdering of developing human
beings while still in the womb due to sexual hedonism gone further
wrong (this represents 95% of ALL abortions performed) . The
consequences of playing god and making up ones own rules , has and
always will lead to utter devastation . This is the outcome of
heathenism via hedonism . And of course, it only gets worse for those
who enter eternity by shunning God and his absolute moral protective
laws and values all of their earthly life. Yes, theres a very big
and final price to be paid .. when it doesnt have to be that way at
all.....vis-a-vis the depravity of mankind.
default
Dec 26, 2011, 3:12:29 PM12/26/11
to
explain when someone who has never "sinned" is visited with some awful
disease?
Your problem is you believe your god has the grace and poise of a
spoiled teenager who likes to pull the wings off flies - and is just
looking for a chance to smite his own creations when they displease
him.
If there was a god, I'm sure he could find much better things to do
than worry about idiots who believe in a god.
Loirbaj
Dec 26, 2011, 3:41:33 PM12/26/11
to
Lets say, for sake of argument, that I believed
in a god - how do you explain when someone
who has never "sinned" is visited with some awful
disease?
BroilJAB laughed,
in a god - how do you explain when someone
who has never "sinned" is visited with some awful
disease?
Unless you are Mother Teresa, tell me of this
'hypothetical person who has never sinned'?
Ken
Dec 26, 2011, 7:23:17 PM12/26/11
to
On Dec 25, 12:01 pm, John Baker <nu...@bizniz.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 11:07:21 -0500, default <defa...@nowhere.net>
Ask him about how he likes to evesdrop on other people's private
dinner conversations concering sex or how he ran out of a friendly
party when couples showed up at the door with (GASP!) ***Bottles of
Wine*** in their hands
To him, that's was the first clue to the beginnings to an all out
neighborhood sex and wife swapping orgy
> On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 11:07:21 -0500, default <defa...@nowhere.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
>
> Or more accurately, Christians have a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation
> with other people's sex lives.
Davie Boi sure does.
>
> > Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
>
> Or more accurately, Christians have a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation
> with other people's sex lives.
Ask him about how he likes to evesdrop on other people's private
dinner conversations concering sex or how he ran out of a friendly
party when couples showed up at the door with (GASP!) ***Bottles of
Wine*** in their hands
To him, that's was the first clue to the beginnings to an all out
neighborhood sex and wife swapping orgy
W.T.S.
Dec 26, 2011, 7:52:37 PM12/26/11
to
In article <918bef49-ab15-4d49-85dd-
2a3163...@q11g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, Rhod...@wmconnect.com
says...
Mother Teresa was both a sinner and a sadist. If there was actually a
"God", she'd have died covered in syphilitic sores.
2a3163...@q11g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, Rhod...@wmconnect.com
says...
"God", she'd have died covered in syphilitic sores.
Budikka666
Dec 26, 2011, 8:25:11 PM12/26/11
to
BroilJAB drops testicle.
Budikka
SkyEyes
Dec 27, 2011, 1:00:53 AM12/27/11
to
On Dec 26, 5:52 pm, "W.T.S." <m...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Mother Teresa was both a sinner and a sadist. If there was actually a
> "God", she'd have died covered in syphilitic sores.
...while screaming for pain medication, which she never got.
> Mother Teresa was both a sinner and a sadist. If there was actually a
> "God", she'd have died covered in syphilitic sores.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
duke
Dec 27, 2011, 7:07:15 AM12/27/11
to
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:41:33 -0800 (PST), Loirbaj <Rhod...@wmconnect.com>
wrote:
Even the bible admits that Jesus alone accomplished that.
The dukester, American-American
*****
Romans 1:16-17
It is the power of God for the salvation of everyone who believes:
for Jew first, then Greek. For in it is revealed the righteousness
of God from faith to faith; as it is written, "The one who is
righteous by faith will live."
*****
wrote:
The dukester, American-American
*****
Romans 1:16-17
It is the power of God for the salvation of everyone who believes:
for Jew first, then Greek. For in it is revealed the righteousness
of God from faith to faith; as it is written, "The one who is
righteous by faith will live."
*****
duke
Dec 27, 2011, 7:08:02 AM12/27/11
to
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:52:37 -0600, "W.T.S." <m1...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>In article <918bef49-ab15-4d49-85dd-
>2a3163...@q11g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, Rhod...@wmconnect.com
>says...
>> Lets say, for sake of argument, that I believed
>> in a god - how do you explain when someone
>> who has never "sinned" is visited with some awful
>> disease?
>>
>> BroilJAB laughed,
>> Unless you are Mother Teresa, tell me of this
>> 'hypothetical person who has never sinned'?
>Mother Teresa was both a sinner and a sadist. If there was actually a
>"God", she'd have died covered in syphilitic sores.
She gave love while you murdered. You're booked to go, wanker.
>In article <918bef49-ab15-4d49-85dd-
>2a3163...@q11g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, Rhod...@wmconnect.com
>says...
>> Lets say, for sake of argument, that I believed
>> in a god - how do you explain when someone
>> who has never "sinned" is visited with some awful
>> disease?
>>
>> BroilJAB laughed,
>> Unless you are Mother Teresa, tell me of this
>> 'hypothetical person who has never sinned'?
>Mother Teresa was both a sinner and a sadist. If there was actually a
>"God", she'd have died covered in syphilitic sores.
W.T.S.
Dec 27, 2011, 7:27:19 AM12/27/11
to
In article <r7djf7tmmkk4vi69d...@4ax.com>, duckgumbo32
@cox.net says...
upon thousands of people to lives of pure misery. She took charitable
contributions and sent them to the Vatican to maintain their high life
styles. The list is endless of her "sins and crimes". She loved them
all right, to death!
@cox.net says...
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:52:37 -0600, "W.T.S." <m1...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >In article <918bef49-ab15-4d49-85dd-
> >2a3163...@q11g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, Rhod...@wmconnect.com
> >says...
> >> Lets say, for sake of argument, that I believed
> >> in a god - how do you explain when someone
> >> who has never "sinned" is visited with some awful
> >> disease?
> >>
> >> BroilJAB laughed,
> >> Unless you are Mother Teresa, tell me of this
> >> 'hypothetical person who has never sinned'?
>
> >Mother Teresa was both a sinner and a sadist. If there was actually a
> >"God", she'd have died covered in syphilitic sores.
>
> She gave love while you murdered. You're booked to go, wanker.
She tortured thousands upon thousands to death, and condemned thousand
>
> >In article <918bef49-ab15-4d49-85dd-
> >2a3163...@q11g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, Rhod...@wmconnect.com
> >says...
> >> Lets say, for sake of argument, that I believed
> >> in a god - how do you explain when someone
> >> who has never "sinned" is visited with some awful
> >> disease?
> >>
> >> BroilJAB laughed,
> >> Unless you are Mother Teresa, tell me of this
> >> 'hypothetical person who has never sinned'?
>
> >Mother Teresa was both a sinner and a sadist. If there was actually a
> >"God", she'd have died covered in syphilitic sores.
>
> She gave love while you murdered. You're booked to go, wanker.
upon thousands of people to lives of pure misery. She took charitable
contributions and sent them to the Vatican to maintain their high life
styles. The list is endless of her "sins and crimes". She loved them
all right, to death!
Colanth
Dec 27, 2011, 3:11:37 PM12/27/11
to
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:23:17 -0800 (PST), Ken <flak...@aol.com>
wrote:
Well, what ELSE do you do with bottles?
--
"I heard somebody say, 'Where's Nelson Mandela?' Well, Mandela's dead.
Because Saddam killed all the Mandelas." - George W. Bush
wrote:
--
"I heard somebody say, 'Where's Nelson Mandela?' Well, Mandela's dead.
Because Saddam killed all the Mandelas." - George W. Bush
The_Echo_Chamber
Dec 27, 2011, 4:15:07 PM12/27/11
to
On Dec 27, 7:08 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:52:37 -0600, "W.T.S." <m...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >In article <918bef49-ab15-4d49-85dd-
> >2a31634eb...@q11g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, Rhodi...@wmconnect.com
made sure people under her care got a good dose of suffering. Cruelty
and neglect were standing orders in her "care homes". It's time you
stopped using that church bulletin as an authoritative news source.
Apparently, she was hording the money sent to take care of these
children, something she would have learned from the catholic church.
Greedy bitch.
"I worked undercover for a week in Mother Teresa's flagship home for
disabled boys and girls to record Mother Teresa's Legacy, a special
report for Five News broadcast earlier this month. I winced at the
rough handling by some of the full-time staff and Missionary sisters.
I saw children with their mouths gagged open to be given medicine,
their hands flaying in distress, visible testimony to the pain they
were in. Tiny babies were bound with cloths at feeding time. Rough
hands wrenched heads into position for feeding. Some of the children
retched and coughed as rushed staff crammed food into their mouths.
Boys and girls were abandoned on open toilets for up to 20 minutes at
a time. Slumped, untended, some dribbling, some sleeping, they were a
pathetic sight. Their treatment was an affront to their dignity, and
dangerously unhygienic.
Volunteers (from Italy, Sweden, the United States and the UK) did
their best to cradle and wash the children who had soiled themselves.
But there were no nappies, and only cold water. Soap and disinfectant
were in short supply. Workers washed down beds with dirty water and
dirty cloths. Food was prepared on the floor in the corridor. A senior
member of staff mixed medicine with her hands. Some did their best to
give love and affection - at least some of the time. But, for the most
part, the care the children received was inept, unprofessional and, in
some cases, rough and dangerous. "They seem to be warehousing people
rather than caring for them," commented the former operations director
of Mencap Martin Gallagher, after viewing our undercover footage."
http://www.newstatesman.com/200508220019
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:52:37 -0600, "W.T.S." <m...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >In article <918bef49-ab15-4d49-85dd-
> >2a31634eb...@q11g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, Rhodi...@wmconnect.com
> >says...
> >> Lets say, for sake of argument, that I believed
> >> in a god - how do you explain when someone
> >> who has never "sinned" is visited with some awful
> >> disease?
>
> >> BroilJAB laughed,
> >> Unless you are Mother Teresa, tell me of this
> >> 'hypothetical person who has never sinned'?
> >Mother Teresa was both a sinner and a sadist. If there was actually a
> >"God", she'd have died covered in syphilitic sores.
>
> She gave love while you murdered. You're booked to go, wanker.
According to the catholic church, suffering is good for people and she
> >> Lets say, for sake of argument, that I believed
> >> in a god - how do you explain when someone
> >> who has never "sinned" is visited with some awful
> >> disease?
>
> >> BroilJAB laughed,
> >> Unless you are Mother Teresa, tell me of this
> >> 'hypothetical person who has never sinned'?
> >Mother Teresa was both a sinner and a sadist. If there was actually a
> >"God", she'd have died covered in syphilitic sores.
>
> She gave love while you murdered. You're booked to go, wanker.
made sure people under her care got a good dose of suffering. Cruelty
and neglect were standing orders in her "care homes". It's time you
stopped using that church bulletin as an authoritative news source.
Apparently, she was hording the money sent to take care of these
children, something she would have learned from the catholic church.
Greedy bitch.
"I worked undercover for a week in Mother Teresa's flagship home for
disabled boys and girls to record Mother Teresa's Legacy, a special
report for Five News broadcast earlier this month. I winced at the
rough handling by some of the full-time staff and Missionary sisters.
I saw children with their mouths gagged open to be given medicine,
their hands flaying in distress, visible testimony to the pain they
were in. Tiny babies were bound with cloths at feeding time. Rough
hands wrenched heads into position for feeding. Some of the children
retched and coughed as rushed staff crammed food into their mouths.
Boys and girls were abandoned on open toilets for up to 20 minutes at
a time. Slumped, untended, some dribbling, some sleeping, they were a
pathetic sight. Their treatment was an affront to their dignity, and
dangerously unhygienic.
Volunteers (from Italy, Sweden, the United States and the UK) did
their best to cradle and wash the children who had soiled themselves.
But there were no nappies, and only cold water. Soap and disinfectant
were in short supply. Workers washed down beds with dirty water and
dirty cloths. Food was prepared on the floor in the corridor. A senior
member of staff mixed medicine with her hands. Some did their best to
give love and affection - at least some of the time. But, for the most
part, the care the children received was inept, unprofessional and, in
some cases, rough and dangerous. "They seem to be warehousing people
rather than caring for them," commented the former operations director
of Mencap Martin Gallagher, after viewing our undercover footage."
http://www.newstatesman.com/200508220019
Smiler
Dec 27, 2011, 7:23:30 PM12/27/11
to
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:11:37 -0500, Colanth wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:23:17 -0800 (PST), Ken <flak...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On Dec 25, 12:01 pm, John Baker <nu...@bizniz.net> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 11:07:21 -0500, default <defa...@nowhere.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
>>>
>>> Or more accurately, Christians have a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation
>>> with other people's sex lives.
>>
>>Davie Boi sure does.
>>Ask him about how he likes to evesdrop on other people's private
>>dinner conversations concering sex or how he ran out of a friendly
>>party when couples showed up at the door with (GASP!) ***Bottles of
>>Wine*** in their hands
>>To him, that's was the first clue to the beginnings to an all out
>>neighborhood sex and wife swapping orgy
>
> Well, what ELSE do you do with bottles?
I don't wish to know what YOU do with empty bottles, but we rinse them and
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:23:17 -0800 (PST), Ken <flak...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On Dec 25, 12:01 pm, John Baker <nu...@bizniz.net> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 11:07:21 -0500, default <defa...@nowhere.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
>>>
>>> Or more accurately, Christians have a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation
>>> with other people's sex lives.
>>
>>Davie Boi sure does.
>>Ask him about how he likes to evesdrop on other people's private
>>dinner conversations concering sex or how he ran out of a friendly
>>party when couples showed up at the door with (GASP!) ***Bottles of
>>Wine*** in their hands
>>To him, that's was the first clue to the beginnings to an all out
>>neighborhood sex and wife swapping orgy
>
> Well, what ELSE do you do with bottles?
put them in the recycling bin.
--
Smiler,
The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made to
exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.
Paul Duca
Dec 27, 2011, 9:54:51 PM12/27/11
to
On Dec 27, 7:08 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:52:37 -0600, "W.T.S." <m...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >In article <918bef49-ab15-4d49-85dd-
> >2a31634eb...@q11g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, Rhodi...@wmconnect.com
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:52:37 -0600, "W.T.S." <m...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >In article <918bef49-ab15-4d49-85dd-
> >2a31634eb...@q11g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, Rhodi...@wmconnect.com
> >says...
> >> Lets say, for sake of argument, that I believed
> >> in a god - how do you explain when someone
> >> who has never "sinned" is visited with some awful
> >> disease?
>
> >> BroilJAB laughed,
> >> Unless you are Mother Teresa, tell me of this
> >> 'hypothetical person who has never sinned'?
> >Mother Teresa was both a sinner and a sadist. If there was actually a
> >"God", she'd have died covered in syphilitic sores.
>
> She gave love while you murdered. Thankfully, she won't give it to me--not that I'd want it from her.
> >> Lets say, for sake of argument, that I believed
> >> in a god - how do you explain when someone
> >> who has never "sinned" is visited with some awful
> >> disease?
>
> >> BroilJAB laughed,
> >> Unless you are Mother Teresa, tell me of this
> >> 'hypothetical person who has never sinned'?
> >Mother Teresa was both a sinner and a sadist. If there was actually a
> >"God", she'd have died covered in syphilitic sores.
>
Colanth
Dec 27, 2011, 10:43:34 PM12/27/11
to
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 00:23:30 +0000, Smiler <Youm...@JoeKing.com>
wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:11:37 -0500, Colanth wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:23:17 -0800 (PST), Ken <flak...@aol.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Dec 25, 12:01 pm, John Baker <nu...@bizniz.net> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 11:07:21 -0500, default <defa...@nowhere.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
>>>>
>>>> Or more accurately, Christians have a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation
>>>> with other people's sex lives.
>>>
>>>Davie Boi sure does.
>>>Ask him about how he likes to evesdrop on other people's private
>>>dinner conversations concering sex or how he ran out of a friendly
>>>party when couples showed up at the door with (GASP!) ***Bottles of
>>>Wine*** in their hands
>>>To him, that's was the first clue to the beginnings to an all out
>>>neighborhood sex and wife swapping orgy
>>
>> Well, what ELSE do you do with bottles?
>
>I don't wish to know what YOU do with empty bottles, but we rinse them and
>put them in the recycling bin.
Than I shan't tell you. :)
--
'Gullible' isn't in the dictionary. Go ahead, look it up!
wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:11:37 -0500, Colanth wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:23:17 -0800 (PST), Ken <flak...@aol.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Dec 25, 12:01 pm, John Baker <nu...@bizniz.net> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 11:07:21 -0500, default <defa...@nowhere.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
>>>>
>>>> Or more accurately, Christians have a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation
>>>> with other people's sex lives.
>>>
>>>Davie Boi sure does.
>>>Ask him about how he likes to evesdrop on other people's private
>>>dinner conversations concering sex or how he ran out of a friendly
>>>party when couples showed up at the door with (GASP!) ***Bottles of
>>>Wine*** in their hands
>>>To him, that's was the first clue to the beginnings to an all out
>>>neighborhood sex and wife swapping orgy
>>
>> Well, what ELSE do you do with bottles?
>
>I don't wish to know what YOU do with empty bottles, but we rinse them and
>put them in the recycling bin.
--
'Gullible' isn't in the dictionary. Go ahead, look it up!
duke
Dec 28, 2011, 6:43:08 AM12/28/11
to
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 06:27:19 -0600, "W.T.S." <m1...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>In article <r7djf7tmmkk4vi69d...@4ax.com>, duckgumbo32
>@cox.net says...
>> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:52:37 -0600, "W.T.S." <m1...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <918bef49-ab15-4d49-85dd-
>> >2a3163...@q11g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, Rhod...@wmconnect.com
>> >says...
>> >> Lets say, for sake of argument, that I believed
>> >> in a god - how do you explain when someone
>> >> who has never "sinned" is visited with some awful
>> >> disease?
>> >>
>> >> BroilJAB laughed,
>> >> Unless you are Mother Teresa, tell me of this
>> >> 'hypothetical person who has never sinned'?
>>
>> >Mother Teresa was both a sinner and a sadist. If there was actually a
>> >"God", she'd have died covered in syphilitic sores.
>>
>> She gave love while you murdered. You're booked to go, wanker.
>She tortured thousands upon thousands to death, and condemned thousand
>upon thousands of people to lives of pure misery.
No, she have a life time of love to thousands of needy. Your value to humanity
>In article <r7djf7tmmkk4vi69d...@4ax.com>, duckgumbo32
>@cox.net says...
>> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:52:37 -0600, "W.T.S." <m1...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <918bef49-ab15-4d49-85dd-
>> >2a3163...@q11g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, Rhod...@wmconnect.com
>> >says...
>> >> Lets say, for sake of argument, that I believed
>> >> in a god - how do you explain when someone
>> >> who has never "sinned" is visited with some awful
>> >> disease?
>> >>
>> >> BroilJAB laughed,
>> >> Unless you are Mother Teresa, tell me of this
>> >> 'hypothetical person who has never sinned'?
>>
>> >Mother Teresa was both a sinner and a sadist. If there was actually a
>> >"God", she'd have died covered in syphilitic sores.
>>
>> She gave love while you murdered. You're booked to go, wanker.
>She tortured thousands upon thousands to death, and condemned thousand
>upon thousands of people to lives of pure misery.
is to murder unborn children.
duke
Dec 28, 2011, 6:44:04 AM12/28/11
to
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:15:07 -0800 (PST), The_Echo_Chamber
<echoch...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Dec 27, 7:08 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:52:37 -0600, "W.T.S." <m...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> >In article <918bef49-ab15-4d49-85dd-
>> >2a31634eb...@q11g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, Rhodi...@wmconnect.com
>> >says...
>> >> Lets say, for sake of argument, that I believed
>> >> in a god - how do you explain when someone
>> >> who has never "sinned" is visited with some awful
>> >> disease?
>>
>> >> BroilJAB laughed,
>> >> Unless you are Mother Teresa, tell me of this
>> >> 'hypothetical person who has never sinned'?
>> >Mother Teresa was both a sinner and a sadist. If there was actually a
>> >"God", she'd have died covered in syphilitic sores.
>>
>> She gave love while you murdered. You're booked to go, wanker.
>
>According to the catholic church, suffering is good for people and she
>made sure people under her care got a good dose of suffering.
She relieved their suffering out of love. You should try it sometimes.
<echoch...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Dec 27, 7:08 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:52:37 -0600, "W.T.S." <m...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> >In article <918bef49-ab15-4d49-85dd-
>> >2a31634eb...@q11g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, Rhodi...@wmconnect.com
>> >says...
>> >> Lets say, for sake of argument, that I believed
>> >> in a god - how do you explain when someone
>> >> who has never "sinned" is visited with some awful
>> >> disease?
>>
>> >> BroilJAB laughed,
>> >> Unless you are Mother Teresa, tell me of this
>> >> 'hypothetical person who has never sinned'?
>> >Mother Teresa was both a sinner and a sadist. If there was actually a
>> >"God", she'd have died covered in syphilitic sores.
>>
>> She gave love while you murdered. You're booked to go, wanker.
>
>According to the catholic church, suffering is good for people and she
>made sure people under her care got a good dose of suffering.
default
Dec 28, 2011, 9:09:18 AM12/28/11
to
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:11:37 -0500, Colanth <col...@pern.invalid>
wrote:
>On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:23:17 -0800 (PST), Ken <flak...@aol.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Dec 25, 12:01 pm, John Baker <nu...@bizniz.net> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 11:07:21 -0500, default <defa...@nowhere.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
>>>
>>> Or more accurately, Christians have a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation
>>> with other people's sex lives.
>>
>>Davie Boi sure does.
>>Ask him about how he likes to evesdrop on other people's private
>>dinner conversations concering sex or how he ran out of a friendly
>>party when couples showed up at the door with (GASP!) ***Bottles of
>>Wine*** in their hands
>>To him, that's was the first clue to the beginnings to an all out
>>neighborhood sex and wife swapping orgy
>
>Well, what ELSE do you do with bottles?
Rinse them and use them for home brewed beer. None of that sissy
budweiser lite crap for me.
wrote:
>On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:23:17 -0800 (PST), Ken <flak...@aol.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Dec 25, 12:01 pm, John Baker <nu...@bizniz.net> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 11:07:21 -0500, default <defa...@nowhere.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
>>>
>>> Or more accurately, Christians have a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation
>>> with other people's sex lives.
>>
>>Davie Boi sure does.
>>Ask him about how he likes to evesdrop on other people's private
>>dinner conversations concering sex or how he ran out of a friendly
>>party when couples showed up at the door with (GASP!) ***Bottles of
>>Wine*** in their hands
>>To him, that's was the first clue to the beginnings to an all out
>>neighborhood sex and wife swapping orgy
>
>Well, what ELSE do you do with bottles?
budweiser lite crap for me.
ilbe...@gmail.com
Dec 28, 2011, 10:18:27 AM12/28/11
to
On Dec 25, 10:07 am, default <defa...@nowhere.net> wrote:
> Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
>
> Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
>
> Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with
raise : http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/answers.html
Colanth
Dec 28, 2011, 10:25:05 AM12/28/11
to
thought it was tainted water. Beer has hops. (I'm with you - and
there's no such thing as "too hoppy".)
John Baker
Dec 28, 2011, 12:26:50 PM12/28/11
to
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 09:08:18 -0500, "Patrick" <bark...@erinot.com>
wrote:
Free clue, Sport. No one who isn't named Patrick and who isn't a
stupid Usenet troll gives a fuck what you think.
>
wrote:
stupid Usenet troll gives a fuck what you think.
>
Free Lunch
Dec 28, 2011, 12:30:01 PM12/28/11
to
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:26:50 -0500, John Baker <nu...@bizniz.net> wrote
in alt.atheism:
As far as I can tell, Patrick does not care what he writes. It would be
generous to imply that he has made any effort to think.
in alt.atheism:
generous to imply that he has made any effort to think.
Patrick
Dec 28, 2011, 1:29:52 PM12/28/11
to
"John Baker" <nu...@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:v8kmf7ds114v4gult...@4ax.com...
Patrick
Dec 28, 2011, 1:31:44 PM12/28/11
to
Free Lunch" <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote
you feel are meaningless, doesn't mean I don't care
about what I write. You are the eager one who loves
to read the shit that I post here. Your life would be
meaningless without me.
> As far as I can tell, Patrick does not care what he writes. It would be
> generous to imply that he has made any effort to think.
Just because I kick yer ass with long diatribes that
> generous to imply that he has made any effort to think.
you feel are meaningless, doesn't mean I don't care
about what I write. You are the eager one who loves
to read the shit that I post here. Your life would be
meaningless without me.
Free Lunch
Dec 28, 2011, 1:35:42 PM12/28/11
to
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:31:44 -0500, "Patrick" <bark...@erinot.com>
wrote in alt.atheism:
You did nothing but cut and paste nonsense or doctrines that contradict
RCC teachings. You make a fool of yourself and congratulate yourself on
doing such a good job.
I congratulate you, too, on making a fool of yourself.
wrote in alt.atheism:
RCC teachings. You make a fool of yourself and congratulate yourself on
doing such a good job.
I congratulate you, too, on making a fool of yourself.
Patrick
Dec 28, 2011, 3:30:19 PM12/28/11
to
"Free Lunch" <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:eaomf7t7jvcc6e824...@4ax.com...
news:eaomf7t7jvcc6e824...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:31:44 -0500, "Patrick" <bark...@erinot.com>
> wrote in alt.atheism:
>
>>Free Lunch" <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote
>>> As far as I can tell, Patrick does not care what he writes. It would be
>>> generous to imply that he has made any effort to think.
>>
>>Just because I kick yer ass with long diatribes that
>>you feel are meaningless, doesn't mean I don't care
>>about what I write. You are the eager one who loves
>>to read the shit that I post here. Your life would be
>>meaningless without me.
>>
> You did nothing but cut and paste nonsense or doctrines that contradict
> RCC teachings.
Which RCC teachings?
> wrote in alt.atheism:
>
>>Free Lunch" <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote
>>> As far as I can tell, Patrick does not care what he writes. It would be
>>> generous to imply that he has made any effort to think.
>>
>>Just because I kick yer ass with long diatribes that
>>you feel are meaningless, doesn't mean I don't care
>>about what I write. You are the eager one who loves
>>to read the shit that I post here. Your life would be
>>meaningless without me.
>>
> You did nothing but cut and paste nonsense or doctrines that contradict
> RCC teachings.
Uergil
Dec 28, 2011, 4:15:08 PM12/28/11
to
In article
<561a8db3-9a31-4537...@f33g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
> > Christianity http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vatican/esp_vatican32.htm
--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less
remote from the- truth who believes nothing than
he who believes what is wrong.
Thomas Jefferson
<561a8db3-9a31-4537...@f33g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less
remote from the- truth who believes nothing than
he who believes what is wrong.
Thomas Jefferson
ken
Dec 28, 2011, 4:42:35 PM12/28/11
to
On Dec 28, 7:18 am, "IlBenButtfucked @gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> This site addresses all of your misconceptions which critics like to
> raise : http://www.godandcocks.org/apologetics/answers.html
Is that where you learned how to suck dicks, Davie Boi?
wrote:
> This site addresses all of your misconceptions which critics like to
Is that where you learned how to suck dicks, Davie Boi?
Patrick
Dec 28, 2011, 6:46:05 PM12/28/11
to
"Uergil" <Uer...@uer.net> wrote --
> "Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less
> remote from the- truth who believes nothing than
> he who believes what is wrong.
> Thomas Jefferson
As an outsider, what do you think of the human race?
> remote from the- truth who believes nothing than
> he who believes what is wrong.
> Thomas Jefferson
Paul Duca
Dec 28, 2011, 7:45:34 PM12/28/11
to
On Dec 28, 6:43 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 06:27:19 -0600, "W.T.S." <m...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >In article <r7djf7tmmkk4vi69d9muq231k0g84b0...@4ax.com>, duckgumbo32
> >@cox.net says...
> lining up to lick her feet in gratitude.
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 06:27:19 -0600, "W.T.S." <m...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >In article <r7djf7tmmkk4vi69d9muq231k0g84b0...@4ax.com>, duckgumbo32
> >@cox.net says...
> >> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:52:37 -0600, "W.T.S." <m...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >> >In article <918bef49-ab15-4d49-85dd-
> >> >2a31634eb...@q11g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, Rhodi...@wmconnect.com
>
> >> >In article <918bef49-ab15-4d49-85dd-
> >> >2a31634eb...@q11g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, Rhodi...@wmconnect.com
> >> >says...
> >> >> Lets say, for sake of argument, that I believed
> >> >> in a god - how do you explain when someone
> >> >> who has never "sinned" is visited with some awful
> >> >> disease?
>
> >> >> BroilJAB laughed,
> >> >> Unless you are Mother Teresa, tell me of this
> >> >> 'hypothetical person who has never sinned'?
>
> >> >Mother Teresa was both a sinner and a sadist. If there was actually a
> >> >"God", she'd have died covered in syphilitic sores.
>
> >> She gave love while you murdered. You're booked to go, wanker.
> >She tortured thousands upon thousands to death, and condemned thousand
> >upon thousands of people to lives of pure misery.
>
> No, she have a life time of love to thousands of needy. Now she has people
> >> >> Lets say, for sake of argument, that I believed
> >> >> in a god - how do you explain when someone
> >> >> who has never "sinned" is visited with some awful
> >> >> disease?
>
> >> >> BroilJAB laughed,
> >> >> Unless you are Mother Teresa, tell me of this
> >> >> 'hypothetical person who has never sinned'?
>
> >> >Mother Teresa was both a sinner and a sadist. If there was actually a
> >> >"God", she'd have died covered in syphilitic sores.
>
> >> She gave love while you murdered. You're booked to go, wanker.
> >She tortured thousands upon thousands to death, and condemned thousand
> >upon thousands of people to lives of pure misery.
>
> lining up to lick her feet in gratitude.
Paul Duca
Dec 28, 2011, 7:46:22 PM12/28/11
to
On Dec 28, 6:44 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:15:07 -0800 (PST), The_Echo_Chamber
>
>
>
> <echochambe...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Dec 27, 7:08 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:52:37 -0600, "W.T.S." <m...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >> >In article <918bef49-ab15-4d49-85dd-
> >> >2a31634eb...@q11g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, Rhodi...@wmconnect.com
> >> >says...
> >> >> Lets say, for sake of argument, that I believed
> >> >> in a god - how do you explain when someone
> >> >> who has never "sinned" is visited with some awful
> >> >> disease?
>
> >> >> BroilJAB laughed,
> >> >> Unless you are Mother Teresa, tell me of this
> >> >> 'hypothetical person who has never sinned'?
> >> >Mother Teresa was both a sinner and a sadist. If there was actually a
> >> >"God", she'd have died covered in syphilitic sores.
>
> >> She gave love while you murdered. You're booked to go, wanker.
>
> >According to the catholic church, suffering is good for people and she
> >made sure people under her care got a good dose of suffering.
>
> She relieved their suffering out of love.
Oh, so she got more than Wilt Chamberlain or Warren Beatty?
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:15:07 -0800 (PST), The_Echo_Chamber
>
>
>
> <echochambe...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Dec 27, 7:08 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:52:37 -0600, "W.T.S." <m...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >> >In article <918bef49-ab15-4d49-85dd-
> >> >2a31634eb...@q11g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, Rhodi...@wmconnect.com
> >> >says...
> >> >> Lets say, for sake of argument, that I believed
> >> >> in a god - how do you explain when someone
> >> >> who has never "sinned" is visited with some awful
> >> >> disease?
>
> >> >> BroilJAB laughed,
> >> >> Unless you are Mother Teresa, tell me of this
> >> >> 'hypothetical person who has never sinned'?
> >> >Mother Teresa was both a sinner and a sadist. If there was actually a
> >> >"God", she'd have died covered in syphilitic sores.
>
> >> She gave love while you murdered. You're booked to go, wanker.
>
> >According to the catholic church, suffering is good for people and she
> >made sure people under her care got a good dose of suffering.
>
> She relieved their suffering out of love.
Paul
>
Zacharias Mulletstein
Dec 29, 2011, 2:44:52 AM12/29/11
to
"Colanth" <col...@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:l3dmf79vt8e3ad6s2...@4ax.com...
--
I am a Fundamentalist Christian Pentecostal Warrior for the One lamb virgin,
Jesus Christ.
default
Dec 29, 2011, 8:40:05 AM12/29/11
to
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 01:44:52 -0600, "Zacharias Mulletstein"
<zachariasm...@isalwaysright.com> wrote:
>Beer is for pussies. Bug spray is what real men huff.
>
Which goes a long way to explaining how you became:
<zachariasm...@isalwaysright.com> wrote:
>Beer is for pussies. Bug spray is what real men huff.
>
Kenny McCormack
Dec 29, 2011, 9:46:46 AM12/29/11
to
--
"Remember when teachers, public employees, Planned Parenthood, NPR and PBS
crashed the stock market, wiped out half of our 401Ks, took trillions in
TARP money, spilled oil in the Gulf of Mexico, gave themselves billions in
bonuses, and paid no taxes? Yeah, me neither."
Alan Ferris
Dec 30, 2011, 5:23:11 AM12/30/11
to
On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 16:09:44 -0500, "Patrick" <bark...@erinot.com>
wrote:
><panam...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:20bf63c1-6206-4202...@n39g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
>On Dec 25, 1:36 pm, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com> wrote:
>> "default" <defa...@nowhere.net> wrote in ...
>> fulfillment.
>
>So has heroin. Were you trying to make a point here?
>snip
>
>+ Yes. Go back and read the entire post.
>+ And then maybe you can grasp my point.
>+ Dipshit.
>
"Your" point? Since when has plagiarised work been yours?
--
Ferrit
()'.'.'()
( (T) )
( ) . ( )
(")_(")
wrote:
><panam...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:20bf63c1-6206-4202...@n39g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
>On Dec 25, 1:36 pm, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com> wrote:
>> "default" <defa...@nowhere.net> wrote in ...
>>
>> > Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
>>
>> Christianity has allowed people to find happiness and self
>> > Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
>>
>> fulfillment.
>
>So has heroin. Were you trying to make a point here?
>snip
>
>+ Yes. Go back and read the entire post.
>+ And then maybe you can grasp my point.
>+ Dipshit.
>
"Your" point? Since when has plagiarised work been yours?
--
Ferrit
()'.'.'()
( (T) )
( ) . ( )
(")_(")
Alan Ferris
Dec 30, 2011, 5:24:27 AM12/30/11
to
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 09:07:24 -0500, default wrote:
>On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 23:56:49 -0500, Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>On 2011-12-25 16:10, Patrick wrote:
>>> "John Baker"<nu...@bizniz.net> wrote in message
>>> news:k70ff7p9bh2difdrc...@4ax.com...
Or in Barkers case it keeps reminding him how his daughters put it
around just like their mum did.
http://www.facebook.com/melanie.berkmen (Nee Barker)
"I've been seeing this woman from Ohio named Melanie Barker for a
couple of months. She's been acting funny lately, like she's hiding
something. A friend of mine told me she was married to a guy named
Randall Ball. Does anybody know her? Can anybody tell me if she's
married, or is my friend just giving me sh!t for fun? I love her and I
really need to know."
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/oneida-tn/THNMJD50TE657AMMM
>On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 23:56:49 -0500, Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>On 2011-12-25 16:10, Patrick wrote:
>>> "John Baker"<nu...@bizniz.net> wrote in message
>>> news:k70ff7p9bh2difdrc...@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 11:07:21 -0500, default<def...@nowhere.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Christianity has a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation with sex.
>>>>
>>>> Or more accurately, Christians have a morbid, unhealthy preoccupation
>>>> with other people's sex lives.
>>>
>>>> with other people's sex lives.
>>>
>>> We don't care about YOUR sex life, until you try
>>> to brag about it. Then we just want you to shaddup.
>>
>>Why?
>
>Envy, would be my guess.
>>> to brag about it. Then we just want you to shaddup.
>>
>>Why?
>
Or in Barkers case it keeps reminding him how his daughters put it
around just like their mum did.
http://www.facebook.com/melanie.berkmen (Nee Barker)
"I've been seeing this woman from Ohio named Melanie Barker for a
couple of months. She's been acting funny lately, like she's hiding
something. A friend of mine told me she was married to a guy named
Randall Ball. Does anybody know her? Can anybody tell me if she's
married, or is my friend just giving me sh!t for fun? I love her and I
really need to know."
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/oneida-tn/THNMJD50TE657AMMM
0 new messages