Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Exposing the Corruption & Truth of Net Neutrality

9 views
Skip to first unread message

Mike

unread,
Dec 15, 2017, 10:22:26 PM12/15/17
to
Our system is more corrupt and broken than most realize. This video exposes the corruption and truth of the FCC vote to destroy Net Neutrality.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FI8SdBHhwqY

docufo

unread,
Dec 16, 2017, 9:06:17 AM12/16/17
to
On 12/15/2017 7:22 PM, Mike wrote:
> Our system is more corrupt and broken than most realize. This video exposes the corruption and truth of the FCC vote to destroy Net Neutrality.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FI8SdBHhwqY
>

It's Donald's FCC Chairman appointee that wants the elite corporate
heads to make more profit, but several big net CEO's "promised" they'd
not take advantage of the new non-restrictive rules.

We can surely trust them, can't we? LOL! The FCC caught Comcast some
years ago sneakily cutting off large downloads midstream while blaming
customers for overloading the bandwidth at certain peak hours, causing
other services to be compromised. But they kept it a secret while
denying the services promised to their customers. That was against FCC
laws. They confessed and said they'd never do it again.

That was under Obama's watch. We can't expect the elitists' generous
Santa, Donald, to keep from kissing elite capitalists' asses since he
likely even kisses his own often when he's not kissing his daughter's,
so to speak.

A good net neutrality 5-minute documentary that explains how the common
people are getting scalped by Donald and his nasty elite gang -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqXKEgTYZBQ

Compare this social and economic fallout with Reagan's deregulation of
the telephone industry, which actually benefited consumers with more
choices, lower rates, and generally better service. This change in FCC
law benefits the CEOs and their investors.

Donald's a fake President. We need a real one. And send him back to his
tower to whip Melania in her bdsm leather slave suit and gag ball.

^Y^
O






Super wealthy JTEM

unread,
Dec 16, 2017, 9:47:57 PM12/16/17
to
Seems I tapped straight into my 15 minutes,
after commenting on Comcasts' battle with
Netflix, the Poster Child for Net Neutrality:

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/168588373663

This is an example of the aftermath:

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/168614926298

Enough to make you weak-kneed, huh?

docufo

unread,
Dec 19, 2017, 2:28:50 AM12/19/17
to
If this FCC ruling stands, it will mean telecom CEOs have the legal
right to charge customers for access to individual "streamers" such as
Netflix and Amazon.

It will likely raise telecom bills substantially, but not necessarily
immediately. Yet, I'd not be surprised if several companies quickly take
advantage of Donald's Xmas gift to the elite.

It'll be one more slogan of protest ("FU Donald You Fake!") to add among
many when demonstrations become common and massive all over the nation,
objecting to the peach-topped tawdry psycho with tiny (groping) hands.

^Y^
V


Super wealthy JTEM

unread,
Dec 19, 2017, 2:58:03 AM12/19/17
to
docufo wrote:

> If this FCC ruling stands, it will mean telecom CEOs have the legal
> right to charge customers for access to individual "streamers" such as
> Netflix and Amazon.
>
> It will likely raise telecom bills substantially, but not necessarily
> immediately. Yet, I'd not be surprised if several companies quickly take
> advantage of Donald's Xmas gift to the elite.

Short term: Rate SPIKES!

Medium to long term: Google and a handful of others
would be poised to take over the internet AND what is
left of the cable market.

Look. Comcast is big, but it got big by ass raping
people mercilessly. Everyone hates Comcast. The
company itself spent YEARS and tens of millions of
dollars investing in being hated.

Literally.

I know that every week, for years on end, we'd
receive offers in the mail from Comcast -- service
deals at incredibly low prices. And like everyone
else in my neighborhood the offers were never open
to us. See, Comcast was the one & only cable company
for a while.

Originally, cable was awarded as a monopoly by each
community, separately. "A" company would get the
contract to provide cable TV. And Comcast bought out
the company that bought out the company that had
bought out that monopoly. So pretty much everyone and
anyone who wanted cable had Comcast. THEY HAD NO
CHOICE! And then...

And then the market opened up, competitors moved in
and Comcast flooded us with this awesome offers
targeting the other guy's customers, but by default
everyone was theirs!

Comcast did this all over the country: Direct
mailing, TV ads & Sunday newspaper inserts convincing
all their customers that they were paying WAY too
much at Comcast...

So we all hate Comcast anyway. They suck. And now
they're campaigning aggressively to fuck us over even
harder. And that's great. But in the end we'd rather
have Netflix than Comcast.

Honest.

And pretty soon Backbones like Google are going to
step in and sell us what we want -- just the bandwidth,
not the stale sitcoms & infomercials -- and none of
us will have any use for Comcast ever again.

And Comcast is fighting for this to happen. And it
will happen.



-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/168691673763

docufo

unread,
Dec 19, 2017, 3:36:58 AM12/19/17
to
Cuntcast has had a rotten customer relations record, and I also was one
of many that experienced their dishonesty, rudeness and rampant greed.

Cuntcast helped diminish the liberal shows on public access right after
it replaced the previous telecom provider here, AT&T.

It had telephone salespeople that were trained to help pass blame back
to the customer, lie about mainframe or line problems, charge for a
"technician" visit, sell another package or add-on service, etc.

I got so fed up with being abused, I dumped them several years ago. They
then showered me with low-cost deals and freebies to get me back on
their bondage list.

Now they've locally contracted with the state, via a county executive's
efforts, to jointly offer low-income, social aid recipients a minimal
high-speed internet service for $10 monthly. A campaign to capture the
needy citizen market is underway, boosted by CenturyLink's success with
their own needy program. They intend to have a pricing war with Qwest
for that particular clientele.

A telecom provider war for food stamps, housing, medical, disability,
SS, SSI recipients' meager incomes. They know some profit-making is
better than none - that would be caused by closing off an entire net
market of millions of poorer people and letting their competition
dominate it. This is capitalism at work - not for humanitarianism,
social responsibility, no, but for another slick program with which to
fill up their coffers.

^Y^
~

0 new messages