SHITTY WESTERN CHRISTIAN BIBLE IS NO DIFFERENT FROM KORAN

[FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer]

http://www.salon.com/2015/09/16/17_biblical_rules_for_marriage_the_kim_davis_set_chooses_to_ignore/

17 biblical rules for marriage the Kim Davis set chooses to ignore
Evangelicals conveniently forget the Good Book encourages polygamy and
prohibits unions between Gentiles and Jews


VALERIE TARICO, ALTERNET

Some people believe that Kentucky—or even all of America—should be
subject to biblical law rather than constitutional law. They believe
public servants like celebrity clerk Kim Davis owe their highest
allegiance to the Bible, which means they shouldn’t be forced to give
out unbiblical marriage licenses—like to gay couples. The issue is
contested by a host of liberals, secularists, Satanists and moderate
Christians. But assuming that Bible believers and religious freedom
advocates carry the day, public servants will need to know their Good
Book. The following 15-item quiz can be used to screen applicants for
county clerk positions or as a guide for those already on the job.

If Kentucky issues only biblical marriage licenses, to which of the
following couples should a county clerk grant a license?

1. A man with a consenting woman, but without her father’s permission.
No. Numbers 30:1-16 teaches that a single woman’s father has final
authority over legal contracts she may enter.

2. A man, a nonconsenting woman, and her father. Yes. According to the
Law of Moses a female is male property, as are slaves, livestock and
children. (See Exodus 20:17, Exodus 21:7.) Her father can give her in
marriage or sell her to a slave master. Female consent in the Bible is
not a prerequisite for marriage or sex.

3. A married man and three other women. Yes. The Old Testament endorses
polygamy, and the New Testament does not reverse this—except for church
elders (1 Timothy 3:2). (See Biblicalpolygamy.com)

4. A childless widow and her husband’s reluctant brother. Yes. Genesis
38:8-10 makes it clear that a man has a responsibility to seed children
for his deceased brother. In the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus doesn’t alter
the tradition but does say it will no longer apply in heaven. (Matthew
22:24-28)

5. Two men. No. Leviticus is clear. Two men having sex is an
abomination, just like eating shellfish, getting tattoos, shaving your
beard, or wearing blend fabrics. (Leviticus 18:22, 20:13, 11:9-12,
19:28, 19:27)

6. Two women. No, not even with their fathers’ permission. Paul’s
epistle to the Romans (1:26) makes it clear that this is degrading and
unnatural.

7. A Christian and a Hindu. No. The Apostle Paul calls this being
unequally yoked (2 Corinthians 6:14). If the applicants balk at your
refusal, you might respond gently with Paul’s own words: “What
fellowship has righteousness with unrighteousness? And what communion
has light with darkness?”

8. A soldier and a virgin prisoner of war. Yes, but you should provide
written instructions on the purification ritual required before bedding
her. The soldier must shave her head and trim her nails and give her a
month to mourn her parents before the first sex act. Also, remind him
that if she fails to “delight,” he must set her free rather than selling
her. (Deuteronomy 21:10-14)

9. A rapist and his victim. Yes, with qualifiers. The woman’s consent is
not an issue, but her father should be present as he is owed 50 shekels
(approximately $580) for the damage to his daughter. Also, the contract
should have an addendum stating clearly that no divorce will be allowed.
The rapist must keep her for life since, obviously, no one else will
want the damaged goods. (Deuteronomy 22:28-29)

10. A man and his wife’s indentured/undocumented servant. Yes, although
you might remind the man that in this case a marriage license is not a
prerequisite for sex, since community property laws apply. However,
should God bless this union with babies, any offspring will belong to
the man and his wife, not the indentured woman. (Genesis 30:1-22)

11. A man and his mother, sister, half-sister, mother-in-law,
grandchild, or uncle’s wife. Probably not. Although God’s law is
timeless and unchanging, He does seem to shift on this one. In the book
of Genesis, God rewards marriages between siblings—for example, the
patriarch Abraham and his half-sister Sarah. But later texts
specifically prohibit a variety of incestuous relationships (e.g. Lev.
18:7-8; Lev. 18:10; Lev. 20:11; Deut. 22:30; Deut. 27:20; Deut. 27:23).

12. A black woman and a white man, or vice versa. Absolutely not.
Scripture is full of verses prohibiting interracial marriage (Gen. 28:6;
Exod. 34:15-16; Num. 25:6-11; Deut. 7:1-3; Josh. 23:12-13; Judges 3:5-8;
1 Kings 11:1-2; Ezra 9:1-2, 12; Ezra 10:2-3, 10-11; Neh. 10:30; Neh.
13:25-27).

13. A gentile and a Jew. No. If the Jew should appeal to the
Anti-Defamation League, remind them of how dangerous such a union could
be: “Thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter
shalt thou take unto thy son. For they will turn away thy son from
following me, that they may serve other gods: so will the anger of the
LORD be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly.” (Deuteronomy 7:3-4)

14. A man and a pregnant woman who claims to be a virgin.Yes. You may
feel personal misgivings about a marriage that is based in deception
from the get-go, but judge not that ye be not judged. One in 200
American women who give birth say they have never had sex. Rather than
plaguing this young couple with your corrosive doubt, you can encourage
them with the biblical virgin birth story, while taking care to avoid
any sex-negative implications that might harm their marriage.

15. A man and a goat. Don’t be ridiculous. Can a goat sign a marriage
license?

16. A man and a sex-trafficked teen he bought from a gangster. Yes, but
not until Kentucky legalizes sex trafficking. Sexual slavery is quite
common in the Bible, well regulated (Exodus 28:8), and frequently
sanctioned or blessed by God. However, the New Testament teaches that we
should pay our taxes and be law-abiding, even under a secular/pagan
government. (Titus 3:1; 1 Peter 2:13-17)

17. Two zombies. Only if they are not Christians. Jesus states clearly
that there will be no marriage for Christians in the afterlife (Matthew
22:24-28). Otherwise, marriage between the undead is not addressed in
the Bible, and you should default to whatever the Supreme Court may have
ruled on this matter.

Note: Some liberal Christian license seekers may complain to you or your
supervisor that these guidelines come mostly from the Old Testament,
which has been replaced by a New Covenant under Jesus. Ask them if the
Old Testament is still part of their Bible. Remind them that the Ten
Commandments are in the Old Testament—all three versions. Lastly, quote
the words of Jesus:

Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not
come to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I say to you, until heaven and
earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the
Law until all is accomplished. Whoever then annuls one of the least of
these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called
least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them, he
shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven (Matthew 5: 17-19).

Stand firm. If the Bible is the perfect Word of the living God, your
detractors are up against the Almighty himself. And, as the spiritual
warfare hymn reminds us, the hordes of (liberal, gay, atheist, feminist)
darkness cannot quench your light.

[Byker]

"FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer" wrote in message
news:55f940fd$0$16668$4c5e...@fastusenet.org...

<snip>

There is a difference. Its believers generally don't go on orgies of killing
whenever it's disparaged.

I'll put up with Mormons any day over Muslims. "So while 'The Book of
Mormon' sells out in Salt Lake City, a musical comedy on Islam won’t be
opening any time soon. Scholars of comparative religion, along with the rest
of the nation, might note the contrast."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The Book of Mormon" comes to Salt Lake City. But where are the suicide
bombers?

Lloyd Billingsley
August 3, 2015

The Book of Mormon, an award-winning musical by the creators of “South
Park,” has opened in Salt Lake City. As ABC news put it, “The biting
satirical musical that mocks Mormons received a rousing reception Tuesday in
its first-ever showing in the heart of Mormonlandia, kicking off a sold-out,
two-week run at a Salt Lake City theater.” So as in New York and Los
Angeles, The Book of Mormon is a smash hit, contrary to what some expected.

“Despite the jokes and jabs that create a caricature of Mormon beliefs,” ABC
news explains, “there were no protests outside and no mass walkouts during
opening night. The playbill did include three advertisements from the Mormon
church, including a picture of a smiling man with the words, “You’ve seen
the play, now read the book.”

In similar style, during the Los Angeles run, the Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter Day Saints, released a statement: “The production may attempt to
entertain audiences for an evening, but the Book of Mormon as a volume of
scripture will change people’s lives forever by bringing them closer to
Christ.”

Clearly, the Mormons, whose six million American members include 2012
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, can take a joke at their own
expense. This marks a stark contrast to Muslims and Islam, by some accounts
the fastest growing religion in America. When it comes to satire of their
religion, Muslims respond in a rather different way. Consider, for example,
what happened in January at the offices of the French satirical magazine
Charlie Hebdo, which published caricatures of the prophet Mohammed.

As the BBC noted, two masked gunmen dressed in black and armed with
Kalashnikov assault rifles got out and approached the offices. They shot
dead caretaker Frederic Boisseau, bodyguard Franck Brinsolaro, editor
Stephane Charbonnier and four other cartoonists, plus three members of the
editorial staff and a guest at the meeting. Witnesses said they had heard
the gunmen shouting “We have avenged the Prophet Muhammad” and “God is
Great” in Arabic while calling out the names of the journalists.” The two
Muslims also killed a French policeman. “One of the attackers then walked up
to the injured officer on the pavement and shot him dead at close range.”

This carnage was all over a few cartoons, but films on Islam draw a similar
response. In 2004, as the New York Times reported, “Theo van Gogh, a Dutch
filmmaker and writer who had recently made a television film critical of
Islam, was shot and stabbed to death on an Amsterdam street on Tuesday.” The
attacker, a Muslim, left a note with passages from the Quran.

In his 1983 novel The Marrakesh One-Two, Richard Grenier noted the
difficulties of making a movie about Mohammed, too holy to be shown or even
to speak. Grenier’s model was The Message (1977) by Moustapha Akkad,
starring Anthony Quinn and subtitled The Story of Islam. Akkad, a Syrian who
had worked with Sam Peckinpah, suggested the presence of Mohammed with a
shadow. Orthodox Muslims denounced the film and the Nation of Islam took
hostages. In 2005 in Jordan, a terrorist bomb claimed the life of Moustapha
Akkad.

Producers were not eager to buy the film rights to Salman Rushdie’s novel
The Satanic Verses, which drew a fatwa from Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini.
Rushdie managed to escape the death sentence but as Vanity Fair recalled,
“bombs exploded in bookshops in the U.S. and the U.K.; the book’s Japanese
translator was shot and killed, its Italian translator was stabbed, its
Turkish translator was attacked, its Norwegian publisher was shot, and two
clerics in Saudi Arabia and Tunisia who spoke out against the fatwa were
shot and killed.” In total, “more than 60 people died in the controversy.”

Meanwhile, there is no Islamic equivalent to the rock opera Jesus Christ
Superstar, by Andrew Lloyd Webber and Tim Rice, which also became a movie.
There is no Muslim equivalent to Mel Brooks’ History of the World in which
Moses manages to drop five of the original 15 commandments. Charlton Heston,
who played Moses in The Ten Commandments, said he had heard every Moses
joke. As David Steinberg had it, God urges Moses to take off his shoes and
approach. Moses burns his feet and God gleefully shouts “Aha! Third one
today!”

Comics, novelists, filmmakers and dramatists can satirize Judaism and
Christianity, in all their variations, in complete safety and with great
financial reward. As the record shows, those who try that with Islam may
wind up dead. So while The Book of Mormon sells out in Salt Lake City, a
musical comedy on Islam won’t be opening any time soon. Scholars of
comparative religion, along with the rest of the nation, might note the
contrast.

http://tinyurl.com/op6mgkg

[Topaz]

Judeo Christians think it is the "end times" even though it has been
the "end times" for over two thousand years so far. They think the one
and only hope is for Jesus to return and straighten everything out.
And a big part of the plan is the destroy the world. They think wars
and everything being blown up is a great thing because it means Jesus
will return soon.

Marxists were murderous lowlifes but they said religion is the opium
of the masses. There obviously is some truth to that. Enemies often
have some truth in their arguments. On top of the opium there is the
Jewish propaganda started by Scofield.

Christians are great for telling what some of the problems are, such
as homosexual perversion, feminism etc. But to actually solve these
problems one should look elsewhere. Who do Christians hate the most,
first Hitler and then the Muslims. These are the two who actually
solved the problems that Christians are famous for speaking against.
Maybe the Muslims go a little overboard but they are the opposite of
liberalism. There is no way that "Brokeback Mountain" would be shown
in a Muslim ruled country.


www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com

[FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer]

On 9/16/2015 11:46 AM, Byker wrote:
> "FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer" wrote in message
> news:55f940fd$0$16668$4c5e...@fastusenet.org...
>
> <snip>
>
> There is a difference. Its believers generally don't go on orgies of
> killing
> whenever it's disparaged.

There is absolutely NO difference between the TWO EVIL RELIGIONS ISLAM
and CHRISTIANITY......

If Islam is a religion of violence, then Christianity is a RELIGION OF
CUNNING AND DECEPTION.


Western Christians are NOT going on orgies of killing BECAUSE their evil
governments are SATISFYING the WESTERN CHRISTIANS' BLOOD LUST by
murdering muslims every day one way or the other in so many countries
around the world.......

Western Christians are AS BLOOD THIRSTY as Muslim terrorists......

[FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer]

At the going rate, there won't be straight white christian man left a
hundred years from now.

[Anonymous]

In article <wukLx.1$1M...@fx24.iad>
"bog" <89...@i.com> wrote:
>
>
> .... In the 13th century Moslems were a pretty advanced culture. They
> invented algebra and the number zero, but what have they done since ?

They did not invent the number zero. The Hindus invented it. The
Arabic Mohammedans just conveyed the information to the Europeans.
The Mohammedans were between the Hindus and the Europeans, that's
why they got to steal the credit for it.

[Anonymous Remailer (austria)]

Actually the Hindus traders copied from the Semites