Trump Says U.S. Will Hit China With More Tariffs

[Rudy Canoza]

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/01/us/politics/china-trade-trump.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage


The fucking moron doesn't realize that American consumers are the ones who
are hit, when they have to pay higher prices.

Trump doesn't know one fucking thing about trade and economics. And NO,
Trump is not "doing" anything to produce a strong economy - the economy is
strong *despite* Trump, not because of him.

[TTl0T⚛← ╬ 𝑴𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕𝒚 𝑾𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒂𝒃𝒆 ╬ →⚛oggvu]

Trump knows exactly what he is doing. Trump has given tax breaks to the rich, including himself, and he is making up the revenue by taxing the hoi polloi, disguised as tariffs on Chinese imports.


 

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 12:20:06 -0700, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
wrote:

Americans that buy Chinese shit DESERVE higher prices.

[Siri Cruise]

In article <00u6ketm7mndc8j8t...@4ax.com>,

Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@null.net> wrote:

> Americans that buy Chinese shit DESERVE higher prices.

Why?

--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The first law of discordiamism: The more energy This post / \
to make order is nore energy made into entropy. insults Islam. Mohammed

[Robert Gowan]

> Americans that [sic]

*who* - the correct relative pronoun is who

> buy Chinese shit DESERVE higher prices.

No, they do not.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 18:59:14 -0700, Robert Gowan <hh_...@homoz.con>
wrote:

Yes, Rudy. They do.

[Ryan Monahan]

No, they do not. You have no standing to say what anyone "deserves."

[default]

On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 12:20:06 -0700, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
wrote:

The master plan: Raise tariffs that US consumers will be forced to
pay, so farmers can be subsidized by the government for the money they
are losing. Who benefits? Trump thinks he is because his grasp of
finances and money is limited to what he can scam or launder for his
Russian constituency. He is stupid and thinks he is smarter than
everyone else.

This is the guy that thought he could wipe out the Federal Deficit by
running the printing presses day and night... Seriously.

[default]

You are posting to a Trumpasite. They drool a lot, often walk out
into traffic and their knuckles drag the ground when they walk. It is
impossible to have a rational conversation with someone who thinks
Trump is a good president.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

Yeah, Rudolph, they do.

You want to settle this with a fist fight?

[chuckle]






"You know I would demolish you in a fistfight."
-Rudy, in a final, desperate attempt
to salvage his pride after being pummeled
senseless.
Message-ID: <EfFpB.31818$xN2....@fx44.iad>


> What's next- a fist fight challenge"
Sure, why not? Meet me at the Jolly Kone hamburger shack in
Bakersfield. I've dispatched a couple of other Usenet loudmouth fat
fucks in the parking lot there. I know the proprietor. If it appears
you've already suffered your stroke, I'll only use one hand to flatten
you.
-Rudy, explaining his fantasy "fist-fight" victories.
Message-ID: <U3SuB.25861$TD2....@fx18.iad>


"You still haven't recovered from the ass-kicking I gave you at the
Jolly Kone, have you? <chuckle>"
-Rudy Canoza to doctor postalman, 11/18/2017, referring to
another imaginary "fist fight"
Message-ID: <hr%PB.10409$Fz6....@fx41.iad>


"I tell you what. I'm about eight inches shorter than Shitbag [6' 2"]
Trump, and at least 80 pounds lighter, and I would *love* to take the
fat fuck on in a fistfight. He gets to pick the *public* venue and
the referee."
-5' 6" Rudy, declaring his wish to fist-fight the President
of the United States, by posting on Usenet.
Message-ID: <Xq8DB.451$Q03...@fx44.iad>


>> Trumpchev is such a vile bit of filth.
> Why don't you challenge him to a fist fight?
I already have. It's legal, too. I even said he gets to pick the
referee and judges - not that they'll really have anything to do.
-A desperate Rudy, trying to claim his previous message was
where he "challenged President Trump to a fist fight."
Message-ID: <bIc1C.305646$oE2.1...@fx33.iad>


>You are fit for someone to slam a fist into your florid fat face.
-Rudy, losing another argument.
Message-ID: <kB73D.209647$4M6.1...@fx27.iad>


I would gladly pay $2,000 for the privilege of beating your fucking
face to a pulp in person.
-Rudy, losing again
Message-ID: <ire3D.198667$bJ2....@fx15.iad>

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Fri, 02 Aug 2019 11:24:52 -0400, default <def...@defaulter.net>
wrote:

It's ALWAYS funny to see idiots who think if you didn't vote for
Hillary you voted for Trump.

"Laugh laugh laugh laugh."
-Lee Harrison 1957-2012, RIP

[default]

Hillary was a reason Trump is in the White House, but she was the
lesser of evils.

[Rudy Canoza]

On 8/2/2019 8:24 AM, default wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 08:02:36 -0700, Ryan Monahan
> <another.fucking.W...@meth.whores> wrote:
>
>> On 8/2/2019 5:31 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>> On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 18:59:14 -0700, Robert Gowan <hh_...@homoz.con>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 8/1/2019 4:38 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 12:20:06 -0700, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/01/us/politics/china-trade-trump.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The fucking moron doesn't realize that American consumers are the ones who
>>>>>> are hit, when they have to pay higher prices.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Trump doesn't know one fucking thing about trade and economics. And NO,
>>>>>> Trump is not "doing" anything to produce a strong economy - the economy is
>>>>>> strong *despite* Trump, not because of him.
>>>>>
>>>>> Americans that [sic]
>>>>
>>>> *who* - the correct relative pronoun is who
>>>>
>>>>> buy Chinese shit DESERVE higher prices.
>>>>
>>>> No, they do not.
>>>
>>> Yes,
>>
>> No, they do not. You have no standing to say what anyone "deserves."
>
> You are posting to a Trumpasite.

I know.

> They drool a lot, often walk out
> into traffic and their knuckles drag the ground when they walk. It is
> impossible to have a rational conversation with someone who thinks
> Trump is a good president.

Correct. He is not a good president. In fact, he is the worst ever.

I have said numerous times that I "get" someone who voted for Trump because
he couldn't abide Clinton, and vice-versa. I don't "get" anyone who voted
for either one in the belief he or she would be a good president. Such
people truly are deplorables, and should not be permitted to vote.

I have also said that Clinton is pretty much as bad a person as Trump. The
only essential difference between them is that she tries to conceal her bad
character, whereas Trump makes his a core element of his personal "brand."

[Rudy Canoza]

Not by much.

The one very small positive about Trump instead of Hillary is that when he
is gone, it will be relatively easier to undo the harm he has caused.
Clinton would have done much more lasting harm.

[Stephen Hall]

Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
> https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/01/us/politics/china-trade-trump.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
>
>
> The fucking moron doesn't realize that American consumers are the ones who
> are hit, when they have to pay higher prices.

Man, regardless of Trump, there should be no money flowing out of US to
China. By paying less you not making America rich, you making China rich.

> Trump doesn't know one fucking thing about trade and economics. And NO,
> Trump is not "doing" anything to produce a strong economy - the economy is
> strong *despite* Trump, not because of him.
>

--
S. Hall

[Rudy Canoza]

On 8/2/2019 3:37 PM, Stephen Hall wrote:
> Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>> https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/01/us/politics/china-trade-trump.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
>>
>>
>> The fucking moron doesn't realize that American consumers are the ones who
>> are hit, when they have to pay higher prices.
>
> Man, regardless of Trump, there should be no money flowing out of US to
> China. By paying less you not making America rich, you making China rich.

Bullshit. You don't know anything about trade, either. In addition, you
have no standing, moral or otherwise, to dictate to people from whom they
must buy. If I want to buy foreign made goods, that's no fucking business
of yours or Trump's.

Trade makes consumers better off. If it didn't, they wouldn't engage in it.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Fri, 02 Aug 2019 16:06:40 -0400, default <def...@defaulter.net>

==================================================
==================================================
================= WARNING! ========================
**** GOAL POST MOVES AHEAD! ****
================= WARNING! ========================
==================================================
==================================================

>Hillary was a reason Trump is in the White House, but she was the
>lesser of evils.

Again.

[default]

On Sat, 03 Aug 2019 03:46:59 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude

It's always funny to see idiots who don't vote then claim some insight
into elections.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Sat, 03 Aug 2019 07:02:47 -0400, default <def...@defaulter.net>

It's even funnier to see idiots who think someone didn't vote if they
didn't vote for Trump or Hillary.

[default]

On Sat, 03 Aug 2019 04:09:48 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude

So you "vote" for someone who doesn't stand any chance of winning? I
guess that makes you a loser in the truest sense of the word.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Sat, 03 Aug 2019 09:12:17 -0400, default <def...@defaulter.net>

So you voted for the loser? That makes YOU a loser! ROFLMAO

[Siri Cruise]

In article <hj3bketm4hs3tcb0l...@4ax.com>,

Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@null.net> wrote:

> So you voted for the loser? That makes YOU a loser! ROFLMAO

You didn't vote for iDJT therefore you voted for a loser. Loser!

[Just Wondering]

Then you guess wrong. It makes you someone willing to express
your dissatisfaction with the two major party candidates where
it matters most - at the ballot box.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

Yeah, keep voting Republican and Democrat, because they're *so*
different. LOL

[default]

On Sat, 03 Aug 2019 06:39:22 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude

No one who voted for Trump could, in any sense of the word, be
considered a winner.

[default]

On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 11:26:15 -0600, Just Wondering <J...@jw.com> wrote:

I get your point, but when it means throwing away a chance to keep
someone truly evil out of office it is a mistake.

[Just Wondering]

Tell us about how that works out when the two major candidates
are Hiliary and Trump, and one of them has a solid majority in
your state. That's what I faced in solidly Trump Utah when I
decided to vote for independent Evan McMullin - who got 20% of
the Utah vote compared to Hiliaries' 27.8%.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Sat, 03 Aug 2019 16:35:44 -0400, default <def...@defaulter.net>

Thanks for admitting you're a loser.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Sat, 03 Aug 2019 16:39:18 -0400, default <def...@defaulter.net>

There was no chance, you idiot.

[default]

Sounds like you are making my case for me. In simple terms, if those
20% voted for Hillary that would give her ~48% of the (popular?) vote.

[default]

On Sat, 03 Aug 2019 16:24:36 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude

Your lack of a reasoned rebuttal is noted.

[default]

On Sat, 03 Aug 2019 16:24:17 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude

Your lack of a reasoned rebuttal is noted.

Klaus, you just aren't worth my time.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Sun, 04 Aug 2019 05:53:48 -0400, default <def...@defaulter.net>
wrote:

Like your "argument" needed reason. LOL

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Sun, 04 Aug 2019 05:52:27 -0400, default <def...@defaulter.net>
wrote:

>>>I get your point, but when it means throwing away a chance to keep
>>>someone truly evil out of office it is a mistake.
>>
>>There was no chance, you idiot.
>
>Your lack of a reasoned rebuttal is noted.

Your idiocy is noted. Now STFU

LOL

[Rudy Canoza]

Lots of sound reasons for doing that.

[Just Wondering]

Or if the reverse happened, McMullin would have received some
electoral votes. It wouldn't have changed the election but
that would really send a message to both major parties that
some changes were needed. Unfortunately, Utah now has people
so enamored of the Romney family that they sent RINO Mitt to
the senate.

[Rudy Canoza]

He will make a good senator, in the best GOP tradition.

[Just Wondering]

I see you haven't yet lost your sense of humor.

[Rudy Canoza]

I'm not joking. People like you who blabber about "RINOs" are the actual
Republicans in name only. What you really are is neo-Nazis. Dwight
Eisenhower and Everett Dirksen and Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan and, yes,
Mitt Romney, were/are real Republicans. You and McMullin are
neo-Nazis...and I'm being generous with the "neo" part.

[Just Wondering]

Mitt Romney is a moderate Democrat (a dying breed today) in
everything but name.

[Rudy Canoza]

On 8/4/2019 7:17 PM, F. Mark Hansen <fmh...@comcast.net>, sleazy ambulance
chaser, possible polygamist and irrational gun nut, lied:

> On 8/4/2019 5:06 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:

>> On 8/4/2019 3:59 PM, F. Mark Hansen <fmh...@comcast.net>, sleazy ambulance chaser, possible polygamist and irrational gun nut, lied:

>>> On 8/4/2019 4:34 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:

>>>> On 8/4/2019 3:28 PM, F. Mark Hansen <fmh...@comcast.net>, sleazy ambulance chaser, possible polygamist and irrational gun nut, lied:

>>>>> On 8/4/2019 3:51 AM, default wrote:

>>>>>> On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 17:02:48 -0600, JF. Mark Hansen <fmh...@comcast.net>, sleazy ambulance chaser, possible polygamist and irrational gun nut, lied:

>>>>>>> On 8/3/2019 2:39 PM, default wrote:

>>>>>>>> On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 11:26:15 -0600, F. Mark Hansen <fmh...@comcast.net>, sleazy ambulance chaser, possible polygamist and irrational gun nut, lied:

Mitt Romney is a Republican - a real one, in the tradition of Eisenhower,
Dirksen, Ford and Reagan. You are a fucking neo-Nazi.

[default]

I'm all in favor of getting rid of a two-party system but I don't see
it happening with the current two parties - as entrenched as they are.

A political party is in direct opposition to a democratic system of
government. The idiot career politicians derive most of their money
and campaign support from the party, so they satisfy the party first
when considering bills.

If anything, all of the so-called campaign finance reform has only
strengthened the position of the political party - aided and abetted
by the idiots on the Supreme Court.