info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Guess the race
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Bret Cahill
Dec 29, 2016, 8:58:43 PM12/29/16
to
"Melvin Johnson, 39, was shot and killed Tuesday on the east side of the
San Francisco Bay Area city, not far from the shrine for his
16-month-old grandson and 20-year-old son, who were fatally shot in
August 2013, the East Bay Times reported Thursday."
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-oakland-killings-20161229-story.html
So if Melvin Johnson was 39 when killed this week, that means he was 36
- possibly still 35 close to turning 36 - when his *20 year old* son was
killed in 2013. That means Johnson was 15 or 16 when his son was born.
Meanwhile, the son was 20 in 2013 when his 16 month old son was killed,
meaning the toddler's father was most likely 18 when his son was born.
Which racial group in America is it that has the highest teen birth - at
one time over 100 per 1,000 teenage girls - and still has an
out-of-wedlock birth rate above 70%?
San Francisco Bay Area city, not far from the shrine for his
16-month-old grandson and 20-year-old son, who were fatally shot in
August 2013, the East Bay Times reported Thursday."
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-oakland-killings-20161229-story.html
So if Melvin Johnson was 39 when killed this week, that means he was 36
- possibly still 35 close to turning 36 - when his *20 year old* son was
killed in 2013. That means Johnson was 15 or 16 when his son was born.
Meanwhile, the son was 20 in 2013 when his 16 month old son was killed,
meaning the toddler's father was most likely 18 when his son was born.
Which racial group in America is it that has the highest teen birth - at
one time over 100 per 1,000 teenage girls - and still has an
out-of-wedlock birth rate above 70%?
Jeanne Douglas
Dec 29, 2016, 9:07:38 PM12/29/16
to
--
JD
"May your winter feast be an orgy of delight"
-- The Big Furry, Late Show with Stephen
Colbert
Omelet Bully-man
Dec 29, 2016, 9:44:49 PM12/29/16
to
Bret Cahill admits, it is addicted to coprophilia:
> Which racial group in America is it ...
The septic Yanks?
--
I fell on my head as a baby, my momma said so!
> Which racial group in America is it ...
The septic Yanks?
--
I fell on my head as a baby, my momma said so!
Rudy Canoza
Dec 29, 2016, 9:52:25 PM12/29/16
to
On 12/29/2016 6:07 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> On 12/29/2016 08:58 PM, Bret Cahill wrote:
>> "Melvin Johnson, 39, was shot and killed Tuesday on the east side of
>> the San Francisco Bay Area city, not far from the shrine for his
>> 16-month-old grandson and 20-year-old son, who were fatally shot in
>> August 2013, the East Bay Times reported Thursday."
>> http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-oakland-killings-20161229-story.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> So if Melvin Johnson was 39 when killed this week, that means he was
>> 36 - possibly still 35 close to turning 36 - when his *20 year old*
>> son was killed in 2013. That means Johnson was 15 or 16 when his son
>> was born. Meanwhile, the son was 20 in 2013 when his 16 month old son
>> was killed, meaning the toddler's father was most likely 18 when his
>> son was born.
>>
>> Which racial group in America is it that has the highest teen birth -
>> at one time over 100 per 1,000 teenage girls - and still has an
>> out-of-wedlock birth rate above 70%?
>
> Um nigger?
>
Ted, I think this must be the real Fat Jeanne. What do you think?
> On 12/29/2016 08:58 PM, Bret Cahill wrote:
>> "Melvin Johnson, 39, was shot and killed Tuesday on the east side of
>> the San Francisco Bay Area city, not far from the shrine for his
>> 16-month-old grandson and 20-year-old son, who were fatally shot in
>> August 2013, the East Bay Times reported Thursday."
>> http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-oakland-killings-20161229-story.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> So if Melvin Johnson was 39 when killed this week, that means he was
>> 36 - possibly still 35 close to turning 36 - when his *20 year old*
>> son was killed in 2013. That means Johnson was 15 or 16 when his son
>> was born. Meanwhile, the son was 20 in 2013 when his 16 month old son
>> was killed, meaning the toddler's father was most likely 18 when his
>> son was born.
>>
>> Which racial group in America is it that has the highest teen birth -
>> at one time over 100 per 1,000 teenage girls - and still has an
>> out-of-wedlock birth rate above 70%?
>
> Um nigger?
>
Bret Cahill
Dec 30, 2016, 3:41:12 AM12/30/16
to
On 12/29/2016 9:32 PM, obadia...@gmail.com wrote:
> Poor people. That's easy.
Blacks. It's dead easy.
Blacks. It's dead easy.
Tom McDonald
Dec 30, 2016, 11:47:16 AM12/30/16
to
Tom McDonald
Dec 30, 2016, 11:52:54 AM12/30/16
to
color of a person than their humanity?
Prosimi
Dec 30, 2016, 12:08:55 PM12/30/16
to
On 12/30/2016 9:47 AM, Tom McDonald wrote:
>> Which racial group in America is it that has the highest teen birth - at
>> one time over 100 per 1,000 teenage girls - and still has an
>> out-of-wedlock birth rate above 70%?
>
> You are a useless piece of shit. Please die and rot.
Just ANSWER THE QUESTION!
>> Which racial group in America is it that has the highest teen birth - at
>> one time over 100 per 1,000 teenage girls - and still has an
>> out-of-wedlock birth rate above 70%?
>
> You are a useless piece of shit. Please die and rot.
Prosimi
Dec 30, 2016, 12:12:58 PM12/30/16
to
> Are you some sort of fucking asshole racist who cares more about the
> color of a person than their humanity?
Bret Cahill
Dec 30, 2016, 12:53:30 PM12/30/16
to
> Please die and rot.
No, I won't do that.
Why are so many blacks born to unmarried teens?
Dry Line
Dec 30, 2016, 1:31:02 PM12/30/16
to
Tom McDonald
Dec 30, 2016, 2:44:57 PM12/30/16
to
Tom McDonald
Dec 30, 2016, 2:47:52 PM12/30/16
to
Socialism and white supremacy cool again. Of course, the last time the
Nazis raised their shaggy heads, we Americans and our allies cut them
off. Not a threat, you understand; just an observation. Oh, and history
does repeat itself. Again, not a threat, just an observation.
Tom McDonald
Dec 30, 2016, 2:50:17 PM12/30/16
to
Oh, and unless you intend to be cremated, you *will* die and rot. It's
sort of just what happens to human bodies.
Dry Line
Dec 30, 2016, 2:51:38 PM12/30/16
to
It's not.
Dry Line
Dec 30, 2016, 2:52:43 PM12/30/16
to
Why does admitting that make you angry?
Tom McDonald
Dec 30, 2016, 2:54:21 PM12/30/16
to
are more of them than of black men in that situation. Do you care about
them, too, or are you just a racist fuckwad focusing on others to make
yourself feel superior?
Tom McDonald
Dec 30, 2016, 2:58:06 PM12/30/16
to
out, try to not be a racist asshole.
Ministry of Vengeance and Vendettas
Dec 30, 2016, 3:00:25 PM12/30/16
to
Tom McDonald <tmcdon...@charter.net> wrote in
news:o462vo$2pd$3...@dont-email.me:
ZI guess the truth is to much for you.
--
"...And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned
from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let
them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to the facts, pardon and
pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of
liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and
tyrants. It is its natural manure."--Thomas Jefferson, Nov. 13, 1787
news:o462vo$2pd$3...@dont-email.me:
--
"...And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned
from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let
them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to the facts, pardon and
pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of
liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and
tyrants. It is its natural manure."--Thomas Jefferson, Nov. 13, 1787
Tom McDonald
Dec 30, 2016, 3:01:11 PM12/30/16
to
don't take care of their kids, leaving the mothers to fend for
themselves and their children? Or are you just wanting to piss and moan
about 'the other' who you can just look down on?
BTW, I know lots of white men who fuck, impregnate, and run. So do you.
Why are you not working to fix that 'ethnic community problem'? Or are
you, and you are just fucking around here?
Dry Line
Dec 30, 2016, 3:01:16 PM12/30/16
to
> In fact, there
> are more of them than of black men in that situation.
> Do you care about
> them, too, or are you just a racist fuckwad focusing on others to make
> yourself feel superior?
Dry Line
Dec 30, 2016, 3:02:13 PM12/30/16
to
demographic most represented, period.
Cope.
Tom McDonald
Dec 30, 2016, 3:04:14 PM12/30/16
to
>> In fact, there
>> are more of them than of black men in that situation.
>
> Funny, the data doesn't represent the same percentage, now does it?
numbers. Which, of course, means that more white women and white
children are suffering from this situation than black women and children.
But you don't seem to care. Why is that?
>> Do you care about
>> them, too, or are you just a racist fuckwad focusing on others to make
>> yourself feel superior?
>
> Funny, the data doesn't represent the same percentage, now does it?
>
individual sufferers from a given situation?
It's almost like you are just angry at black folks for being black.
Ministry of Vengeance and Vendettas
Dec 30, 2016, 3:04:46 PM12/30/16
to
Tom McDonald <tmcdon...@charter.net> wrote in news:o46dct$f6i$2@dont-
email.me:
Ypu do them no service but not holding them to the same standard as you do
others.
But then again the Democrat Party, in it's hypocrtical attempt to help black
people, has made thier lot much worse of the last 50 years. Good job.
email.me:
others.
But then again the Democrat Party, in it's hypocrtical attempt to help black
people, has made thier lot much worse of the last 50 years. Good job.
Tom McDonald
Dec 30, 2016, 3:05:16 PM12/30/16
to
> Cope.
OK. I have a coping saw. What do you need coped?
Dry Line
Dec 30, 2016, 3:05:33 PM12/30/16
to
Funny, the data doesn't represent the same percentage, now does it?
> BTW, I know lots of white men who fuck, impregnate, and run. So do you.
> Why are you not working to fix that 'ethnic community problem'? Or are
> you, and you are just fucking around here?
> Why are you not working to fix that 'ethnic community problem'? Or are
> you, and you are just fucking around here?
Ministry of Vengeance and Vendettas
Dec 30, 2016, 3:05:58 PM12/30/16
to
Tom McDonald <tmcdon...@charter.net> wrote in
news:o46duh$hn2$1...@dont-email.me:
Dry Line
Dec 30, 2016, 3:06:37 PM12/30/16
to
Tom McDonald
Dec 30, 2016, 3:06:45 PM12/30/16
to
bit. Now you're just boring.
Ministry of Vengeance and Vendettas
Dec 30, 2016, 3:06:55 PM12/30/16
to
Tom McDonald <tmcdon...@charter.net> wrote in
news:o46dms$g4b$2...@dont-email.me:
racists?
> Oh, and unless you intend to be cremated, you *will* die and rot. It's
> sort of just what happens to human bodies.
>
Dry Line
Dec 30, 2016, 3:06:55 PM12/30/16
to
Funny, the data doesn't represent the same percentage, now does it?
>
>
>> Cope.
>
> OK. I have a coping saw. What do you need coped?
>
>
> OK. I have a coping saw. What do you need coped?
>
Ministry of Vengeance and Vendettas
Dec 30, 2016, 3:08:05 PM12/30/16
to
"helping" blacks.
Ministry of Vengeance and Vendettas
Dec 30, 2016, 3:09:11 PM12/30/16
to
Tom McDonald <tmcdon...@charter.net> wrote in
news:o46dic$g4b$1...@dont-email.me:
You lose.
Dry Line
Dec 30, 2016, 3:19:03 PM12/30/16
to
Statistics show just what that fullness means. Children of unmarried
mothers of any race are more likely to perform poorly in school, go to
prison, use drugs, be poor as adults, and have their own children out of
wedlock.
More than 40 years of debate
The black community's 72 percent rate eclipses that of most other
groups: 17 percent of Asians, 29 percent of whites, 53 percent of
Hispanics and 66 percent of Native Americans were born to unwed mothers
in 2008, the most recent year for which government figures are
available. The rate for the overall U.S. population was 41 percent.
This issue entered the public consciousness in 1965, when a now famous
government report by future senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan described a
"tangle of pathology" among blacks that fed a 24 percent black
"illegitimacy" rate. The white rate then was 4 percent.
Dry Line
Dec 30, 2016, 3:19:35 PM12/30/16
to
Statistics show just what that fullness means. Children of unmarried
mothers of any race are more likely to perform poorly in school, go to
prison, use drugs, be poor as adults, and have their own children out of
wedlock.
More than 40 years of debate
The black community's 72 percent rate eclipses that of most other
groups: 17 percent of Asians, 29 percent of whites, 53 percent of
Hispanics and 66 percent of Native Americans were born to unwed mothers
in 2008, the most recent year for which government figures are
available. The rate for the overall U.S. population was 41 percent.
This issue entered the public consciousness in 1965, when a now famous
government report by future senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan described a
"tangle of pathology" among blacks that fed a 24 percent black
"illegitimacy" rate. The white rate then was 4 percent.
Bret Cahill
Dec 30, 2016, 3:27:44 PM12/30/16
to
arrow in his quiver.
Blacks have a very high degree of social pathology in their culture, and
high out-of-wedlock birth, and astronomical teen birth rates, are just
manifestations of that pathology. It's bad for the blacks themselves,
and it makes blacks bad for the rest of us.
There's just no denying it.
Bret Cahill
Dec 30, 2016, 3:52:37 PM12/30/16
to
whites than among blacks. Come to think of it, nearly *every* social
pathology has a lower incidence among whites than among blacks.
Those are just facts, whether or not you like them.
Bret Cahill
Dec 30, 2016, 3:53:10 PM12/30/16
to
of course.
First-Post
Dec 30, 2016, 4:05:53 PM12/30/16
to
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:53:08 -0800, Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aöl.con>
wrote:
Thus exposing a major flaw in progressive ideology.
That being that you can never even begin to find a solution to any
problem if you only look at it through emotional instead of logical
and factual lenses.
wrote:
That being that you can never even begin to find a solution to any
problem if you only look at it through emotional instead of logical
and factual lenses.
prosciutto
Dec 30, 2016, 4:21:12 PM12/30/16
to
Proscimi stinks too much:
> shitbag
As you wish...our noses are fully protected!
Your newsgroup bowel movements in
talk.politics.guns,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,us.politics,alt.politics are
quite random.
--
my brain-farts are better than yours ...and stink less
> shitbag
As you wish...our noses are fully protected!
Your newsgroup bowel movements in
talk.politics.guns,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,us.politics,alt.politics are
quite random.
--
my brain-farts are better than yours ...and stink less
Dechucka
Dec 30, 2016, 4:39:28 PM12/30/16
to
"Bret Cahill" <bretcahill@aöl.con> wrote in message
news:UOz9A.59857$YA2....@fx16.iad...
and Melanin Theory when it comes to analysis and facts
Siri Cruise
Dec 30, 2016, 4:50:12 PM12/30/16
to
In article <UOz9A.59857$YA2....@fx16.iad>, Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aöl.con>
wrote:
> Observing high incidence of social pathology among blacks is not racist,
> of course.
That's the way to entice into the Republican party.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Free the Amos Yee one.
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha.
wrote:
> Observing high incidence of social pathology among blacks is not racist,
> of course.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Free the Amos Yee one.
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha.
Jeanne Douglas
Dec 30, 2016, 6:25:19 PM12/30/16
to
In article <UOz9A.59857$YA2....@fx16.iad>,
Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aöl.con> wrote:
Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aöl.con> wrote:
--
JD
"May your winter feast be an orgy of delight"
-- The Big Furry, Late Show with Stephen
Colbert
Jeanne Douglas
Dec 30, 2016, 6:30:29 PM12/30/16
to
In article <o46eba$jd8$1...@dont-email.me>,
Especially since black fathers spend more time with their kids than do
white fathers or Hispanic fathers, whether married to the mother or not.
white fathers or Hispanic fathers, whether married to the mother or not.
Jeanne Douglas
Dec 30, 2016, 6:31:49 PM12/30/16
to
In article <o46954$d36$8...@news.mixmin.net>, Dry Line <a...@a.bat> wrote:
> On 12/30/2016 10:53 AM, Bret Cahill wrote:
> > On 12/30/2016 8:47 AM, Tom McDonald wrote:
> >> On 12/29/2016 7:58 PM, Bret Cahill wrote:
> >>> "Melvin Johnson, 39, was shot and killed Tuesday on the east side of the
> >>> San Francisco Bay Area city, not far from the shrine for his
> >>> 16-month-old grandson and 20-year-old son, who were fatally shot in
> >>> August 2013, the East Bay Times reported Thursday."
> >>> http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-oakland-killings-20161229-story.h
> >>> tml
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> So if Melvin Johnson was 39 when killed this week, that means he was 36
> >>> - possibly still 35 close to turning 36 - when his *20 year old* son was
> >>> killed in 2013. That means Johnson was 15 or 16 when his son was born.
> >>> Meanwhile, the son was 20 in 2013 when his 16 month old son was killed,
> >>> meaning the toddler's father was most likely 18 when his son was born.
> >>>
> >>> Which racial group in America is it that has the highest teen birth - at
> >>> one time over 100 per 1,000 teenage girls - and still has an
> >>> out-of-wedlock birth rate above 70%?
> >>
> >> You are a useless piece of shit.
> >
> > Incorrect.
> >
> >> Please die and rot.
> >
> > No, I won't do that.
> >
> >
> > Why are so many blacks born to unmarried teens?
>
fathers or Hispanic fathers?
> On 12/30/2016 10:53 AM, Bret Cahill wrote:
> > On 12/30/2016 8:47 AM, Tom McDonald wrote:
> >> On 12/29/2016 7:58 PM, Bret Cahill wrote:
> >>> "Melvin Johnson, 39, was shot and killed Tuesday on the east side of the
> >>> San Francisco Bay Area city, not far from the shrine for his
> >>> 16-month-old grandson and 20-year-old son, who were fatally shot in
> >>> August 2013, the East Bay Times reported Thursday."
> >>> http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-oakland-killings-20161229-story.h
> >>> tml
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> So if Melvin Johnson was 39 when killed this week, that means he was 36
> >>> - possibly still 35 close to turning 36 - when his *20 year old* son was
> >>> killed in 2013. That means Johnson was 15 or 16 when his son was born.
> >>> Meanwhile, the son was 20 in 2013 when his 16 month old son was killed,
> >>> meaning the toddler's father was most likely 18 when his son was born.
> >>>
> >>> Which racial group in America is it that has the highest teen birth - at
> >>> one time over 100 per 1,000 teenage girls - and still has an
> >>> out-of-wedlock birth rate above 70%?
> >>
> >> You are a useless piece of shit.
> >
> > Incorrect.
> >
> >> Please die and rot.
> >
> > No, I won't do that.
> >
> >
> > Why are so many blacks born to unmarried teens?
>
> Because so many black fathers are deadbeats.
Then why do they spend more time with their children than do white
fathers or Hispanic fathers?
radar range
Dec 30, 2016, 6:39:21 PM12/30/16
to
On 12/30/2016 2:39 PM, Dechucka wrote:
> however the conclusions you draw are right up there
Get out of our US groups, Auztard!
> however the conclusions you draw are right up there
radar range
Dec 30, 2016, 6:40:52 PM12/30/16
to
On 12/30/2016 2:50 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
> In article <UOz9A.59857$YA2....@fx16.iad>, Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aöl.con>
> In article <UOz9A.59857$YA2....@fx16.iad>, Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aöl.con>
> wrote:
>
>> Observing high incidence of social pathology among blacks is not racist,
>> of course.
>
> That's the way to entice into the Republican party.
>
Learn to speak English, meth face.
>
>> Observing high incidence of social pathology among blacks is not racist,
>> of course.
>
> That's the way to entice into the Republican party.
>
radar range
Dec 30, 2016, 6:45:42 PM12/30/16
to
On 12/30/2016 4:25 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> In article <UOz9A.59857$YA2....@fx16.iad>,
> In article <UOz9A.59857$YA2....@fx16.iad>,
> Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aöl.con> wrote:
>
>> On 12/30/2016 11:58 AM, Tom McDonald wrote:
>>> On 12/30/2016 1:51 PM, Dry Line wrote:
>>>> On 12/30/2016 12:45 PM, Tom McDonald wrote:
>>>>> On 12/30/2016 11:08 AM, Prosimi wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/30/2016 9:47 AM, Tom McDonald wrote:
>>>>>>>> Which racial group in America is it that has the highest teen birth
>>>>>>>> - at
>>>>>>>> one time over 100 per 1,000 teenage girls - and still has an
>>>>>>>> out-of-wedlock birth rate above 70%?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are a useless piece of shit. Please die and rot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just ANSWER THE QUESTION!
>>>>>
>>>>> Human race. IS THAT ENOUGH OF AN ANSWER FOR YOU, SHITFACE?
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>>
>>>> It's not.
>>>
>>> OK, then I'll go with Homo sapiens sapiens. While you're puzzling that
>>> out, try to not be a racist asshole.
>>
>> Observing high incidence of social pathology among blacks is not racist,
>> of course.
>
> What "social pathology"?
>
Deadbeat dads, you dumb fucking fat cunt!
>
>> On 12/30/2016 11:58 AM, Tom McDonald wrote:
>>> On 12/30/2016 1:51 PM, Dry Line wrote:
>>>> On 12/30/2016 12:45 PM, Tom McDonald wrote:
>>>>> On 12/30/2016 11:08 AM, Prosimi wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/30/2016 9:47 AM, Tom McDonald wrote:
>>>>>>>> Which racial group in America is it that has the highest teen birth
>>>>>>>> - at
>>>>>>>> one time over 100 per 1,000 teenage girls - and still has an
>>>>>>>> out-of-wedlock birth rate above 70%?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are a useless piece of shit. Please die and rot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just ANSWER THE QUESTION!
>>>>>
>>>>> Human race. IS THAT ENOUGH OF AN ANSWER FOR YOU, SHITFACE?
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>>
>>>> It's not.
>>>
>>> OK, then I'll go with Homo sapiens sapiens. While you're puzzling that
>>> out, try to not be a racist asshole.
>>
>> Observing high incidence of social pathology among blacks is not racist,
>> of course.
>
> What "social pathology"?
>
radar range
Dec 30, 2016, 6:46:19 PM12/30/16
to
On 12/30/2016 4:30 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> black fathers spend more time with their kids than do
> white fathers or Hispanic fathers,
WTF?!?!
> black fathers spend more time with their kids than do
> white fathers or Hispanic fathers,
Make a lot of siot up do ya lardo?
radar range
Dec 30, 2016, 6:47:02 PM12/30/16
to
On 12/30/2016 4:31 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
>> Because so many black fathers are deadbeats.
> Then why do they spend more time with their children than do white
> fathers or Hispanic fathers?
They don't, you dumb fat twat!
>> Because so many black fathers are deadbeats.
> Then why do they spend more time with their children than do white
> fathers or Hispanic fathers?
That's why their kids are raised by mothers and grannies.
Chaff busts your radar arse
Dec 30, 2016, 7:16:02 PM12/30/16
to
Defective radar range used as scrap metal:
> Get out
Much too late for that now. You'll have to face the music in
talk.politics.guns,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics,us.politics
--
pathetic brainfarts blocked
> Get out
Much too late for that now. You'll have to face the music in
talk.politics.guns,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics,us.politics
--
pathetic brainfarts blocked
Chaff busts your radar arse
Dec 30, 2016, 7:17:58 PM12/30/16
to
Chaff busts your radar arse
Dec 30, 2016, 7:19:32 PM12/30/16
to
Chaff busts your radar arse
Dec 30, 2016, 7:32:54 PM12/30/16
to
Chaff busts your radar arse
Dec 30, 2016, 7:39:33 PM12/30/16
to
Defective radar range used as scrap metal:
> Learn to speak English...
But much too late for that now.
You are obviously learn resistant
Still, you'll have to face the music in
Chaff busts your radar arse
Dec 30, 2016, 8:04:10 PM12/30/16
to
Defective radar range used as scrap metal:
> Deadbeat.
All that sudden self deprecation!
Have you just had a therapy session?
--
pathetic brainfarts blocked
Chaff busts your radar arse
Dec 30, 2016, 8:11:07 PM12/30/16
to
Defective radar range used as scrap metal:
> Make a lot...
... of farts into cyberspace?
Do you think that would frighten anyone?
We use the proper gas-masks for protection here before opening your posts.
--
pathetic brainfarts blocked
Chaff busts your radar arse
Dec 30, 2016, 8:14:09 PM12/30/16
to
Defective radar range used as scrap metal:
> dumb
> That's why
No need to rub it in.
We already have understood you condition.
--
pathetic brainfarts blocked
Frank Tomaszewski
Dec 30, 2016, 8:57:58 PM12/30/16
to
Frank Tomaszewski
Dec 30, 2016, 8:58:27 PM12/30/16
to
Jeanne Douglas
Dec 30, 2016, 9:21:15 PM12/30/16
to
In article <5hE9A.137173$BE2....@fx22.iad>,
I don't make shit up. I have the facts and the fact here is that the CDC
has the data to prove it.
<http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/5/13/1383179/-The-absent-black-father
-myth-debunked-by-CDC>
or
<http://bit.ly/1SRhOFm>
and
<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/08/opinion/charles-blow-black-dads-are-do
ing-the-best-of-all.html>
or
<http://nyti.ms/1HXXBIY>
and here's the actual CDC paper:
<https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr071.pdf>
Now, don't you feel silly for believing a racist lie?
has the data to prove it.
<http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/5/13/1383179/-The-absent-black-father
-myth-debunked-by-CDC>
or
<http://bit.ly/1SRhOFm>
and
<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/08/opinion/charles-blow-black-dads-are-do
ing-the-best-of-all.html>
or
<http://nyti.ms/1HXXBIY>
and here's the actual CDC paper:
<https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr071.pdf>
Now, don't you feel silly for believing a racist lie?
Jeanne Douglas
Dec 30, 2016, 9:21:41 PM12/30/16
to
In article <EgE9A.137172$BE2....@fx22.iad>,
Why are you ignorant of the CDC study that proved this?
Frank Tomaszewski
Dec 30, 2016, 11:33:58 PM12/30/16
to
Bret Cahill
Dec 30, 2016, 11:55:01 PM12/30/16
to
On 12/30/2016 3:25 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> In article <UOz9A.59857$YA2....@fx16.iad>,
> In article <UOz9A.59857$YA2....@fx16.iad>,
> Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aöl.con> wrote:
>
>> On 12/30/2016 11:58 AM, Tom McDonald wrote:
>>> On 12/30/2016 1:51 PM, Dry Line wrote:
>>>> On 12/30/2016 12:45 PM, Tom McDonald wrote:
>>>>> On 12/30/2016 11:08 AM, Prosimi wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/30/2016 9:47 AM, Tom McDonald wrote:
>>>>>>>> Which racial group in America is it that has the highest teen birth
>>>>>>>> - at
>>>>>>>> one time over 100 per 1,000 teenage girls - and still has an
>>>>>>>> out-of-wedlock birth rate above 70%?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are a useless piece of shit. Please die and rot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just ANSWER THE QUESTION!
>>>>>
>>>>> Human race. IS THAT ENOUGH OF AN ANSWER FOR YOU, SHITFACE?
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>>
>>>> It's not.
>>>
>>> OK, then I'll go with Homo sapiens sapiens. While you're puzzling that
>>> out, try to not be a racist asshole.
>>
>> Observing high incidence of social pathology among blacks is not racist,
>> of course.
>
> What "social pathology"?
Stop playing dumb. You *are* dumb, but you're not that dumb.
>
>> On 12/30/2016 11:58 AM, Tom McDonald wrote:
>>> On 12/30/2016 1:51 PM, Dry Line wrote:
>>>> On 12/30/2016 12:45 PM, Tom McDonald wrote:
>>>>> On 12/30/2016 11:08 AM, Prosimi wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/30/2016 9:47 AM, Tom McDonald wrote:
>>>>>>>> Which racial group in America is it that has the highest teen birth
>>>>>>>> - at
>>>>>>>> one time over 100 per 1,000 teenage girls - and still has an
>>>>>>>> out-of-wedlock birth rate above 70%?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are a useless piece of shit. Please die and rot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just ANSWER THE QUESTION!
>>>>>
>>>>> Human race. IS THAT ENOUGH OF AN ANSWER FOR YOU, SHITFACE?
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>>
>>>> It's not.
>>>
>>> OK, then I'll go with Homo sapiens sapiens. While you're puzzling that
>>> out, try to not be a racist asshole.
>>
>> Observing high incidence of social pathology among blacks is not racist,
>> of course.
>
> What "social pathology"?
Leave the followups alone.
Jeanne Douglas
Dec 31, 2016, 12:31:37 AM12/31/16
to
In article <UyG9A.435977$8E2.4...@fx33.iad>,
Why are you pretending you didn't see the link to the actual CDC
document? Are you always this dishonest?
document? Are you always this dishonest?
Kadaitcha Man
Dec 31, 2016, 3:19:43 AM12/31/16
to
Jeanne Douglas, o most insatiate and luxurious woman. Ye
scatterbrained rank-scented meiny, ye catechised:
Translation: "You have what it takes to be an alt.atheist."
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.atheism
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
scatterbrained rank-scented meiny, ye catechised:
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.atheism
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Siri Cruise
Dec 31, 2016, 7:55:37 AM12/31/16
to
In article <6E944BD0...@Kordia.Granulomatis.Usgae>,
To kill an alt.atheist zombie, don't shoot them in the head. Aim for the butt.
'Crap. I wantz crap.'
'Crap. I wantz crap.'
Kadaitcha Man
Dec 31, 2016, 8:19:11 AM12/31/16
to
Siri Cruise, teeth hadst thou in thy head when thou wast born to
signify ye came to bite the world. Ye are a scatterbrained malefactor,
a bleary-eyed piece of valiant dust, a monotonic fever blister, a
fobbing insinuating rogue, ye chatted:
Yes, the location of their single brain cell.
> 'Crap. I wantz crap.'
>
--
signify ye came to bite the world. Ye are a scatterbrained malefactor,
a bleary-eyed piece of valiant dust, a monotonic fever blister, a
fobbing insinuating rogue, ye chatted:
> 'Crap. I wantz crap.'
>
--
radar range
Dec 31, 2016, 2:11:46 PM12/31/16
to
On 12/31/2016 5:55 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
> Aim for the butt.
Is that how you lost your cherry?
> Aim for the butt.
Is that how you lost your cherry?
radar range
Dec 31, 2016, 2:16:26 PM12/31/16
to
On 12/30/2016 10:31 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
>> Why do you get all your fake "news" from Daily Kos?
>
> Why are you pretending you didn't see the link
Answer the question - BEAST!
>> Why do you get all your fake "news" from Daily Kos?
>
> Why are you pretending you didn't see the link
radar range
Dec 31, 2016, 2:17:01 PM12/31/16
to
On 12/30/2016 9:33 PM, Frank Tomaszewski wrote:
> Why do y
You give NO MORE ORDERS HERE...or ANYWHERE - Jonathan "little man" Ball!
_______________________________________________________________________________
Jonathan Ball aka Rudy Canoza 08 Sep 2005 http://bit.ly/2cYknsh
[end]
Jonathan Ball. Pasadena, CA. Priceless! That email, posted from Jonathan
Ball,
you, and the return email sent to Jonathan Ball proves beyond all doubt that
you are Jonathan Ball. Of course, you don't live in Pasadena since moving to
5327 Shepard Ave Sacramento, CA 95819-1731
Here's the proof Jonathan D Ball http://bit.ly/1LFy9t8
______________________________________________________________________________
> Why do y
You give NO MORE ORDERS HERE...or ANYWHERE - Jonathan "little man" Ball!
_______________________________________________________________________________
Jonathan Ball aka Rudy Canoza 08 Sep 2005 http://bit.ly/2cYknsh
[end]
Jonathan Ball. Pasadena, CA. Priceless! That email, posted from Jonathan
Ball,
you, and the return email sent to Jonathan Ball proves beyond all doubt that
you are Jonathan Ball. Of course, you don't live in Pasadena since moving to
5327 Shepard Ave Sacramento, CA 95819-1731
Here's the proof Jonathan D Ball http://bit.ly/1LFy9t8
______________________________________________________________________________
radar range
Dec 31, 2016, 2:20:00 PM12/31/16
to
On 12/30/2016 6:57 PM, Frank Tomaszewski wrote:
> What bullshit!
Shaddup tRudey, your act is about to get DESTROYED here again:
You're the pathetic Jonathan Ball, you miserable little turdblossom!
We return you to the Jonathan Ball exhibition display:
11 years ago, while posting under this current nym, Rudy Canoza, we had a
discussion about a revised marketing claim concerning grass-fed beef from
USDA. You claimed that you had written to and received a reply from
William T.
Sessions, Associate Deputy Administrator, Livestock and Seed Program. Here
below is the post you wrote using the nym Rudy Canoza containing your
correspondence with William Sessions.
[start- Jon to me]
Eat shit and bark at the moon, Dreck - the proposed
standard has NOT been adopted. I wrote to William
Sessions, the associate deputy administrator (how's
that for a title) at the Livestock and Seed Program at
USDA that is in charge of writing the standard for the
"meat marketing claims"; his name, title and e-mail
address are at a web page whose URL I gave yesterday,
http://www.fass.org/fasstrack/news_item.asp?news_id=1152
Here's his reply:
From: "Sessions, William" <William....@usda.gov>
To: <jonball@[...]>
Mr. Ball: Thanks for your message. The marketing claim
standards are still under review by USDA. Accordingly, the
standards have not been published in a final form for use. I
hope this information is helpful.
Please let me know if further information is needed.
Thanks,
William T. Sessions
Associate Deputy Administrator
Livestock and Seed Program
-----Original Message-----
From: jonball@[...]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 11:38 AM
To: Sessions, William
Subject: 2003 proposed standards for meat marketing claims
I have read about the proposed standards, and I've seen
many of the public comments sent to USDA. I cannot find
anything to indicate if the standards were adopted.
Were the standards as proposed in 2003 adopted?
Thanks in advance.
Jonathan Ball
Pasadena, CA
Yeah you will. You're an old man who hasn't looked after himself. I wouldn't
go around goading people if I was as small and as puny as you are, liar Jon.
You ought to be very careful.
> You certainly have no means to hasten my death.
Are you really serious, weed? you're just over 5 feet tall and 64 years old.
You'll be 65 on December 2nd. You've got to stop threatening people and
goading them to come after you. You're pathetic.
> What bullshit!
Shaddup tRudey, your act is about to get DESTROYED here again:
You're the pathetic Jonathan Ball, you miserable little turdblossom!
We return you to the Jonathan Ball exhibition display:
11 years ago, while posting under this current nym, Rudy Canoza, we had a
discussion about a revised marketing claim concerning grass-fed beef from
USDA. You claimed that you had written to and received a reply from
William T.
Sessions, Associate Deputy Administrator, Livestock and Seed Program. Here
below is the post you wrote using the nym Rudy Canoza containing your
correspondence with William Sessions.
[start- Jon to me]
Eat shit and bark at the moon, Dreck - the proposed
standard has NOT been adopted. I wrote to William
Sessions, the associate deputy administrator (how's
that for a title) at the Livestock and Seed Program at
USDA that is in charge of writing the standard for the
"meat marketing claims"; his name, title and e-mail
address are at a web page whose URL I gave yesterday,
http://www.fass.org/fasstrack/news_item.asp?news_id=1152
Here's his reply:
From: "Sessions, William" <William....@usda.gov>
To: <jonball@[...]>
Mr. Ball: Thanks for your message. The marketing claim
standards are still under review by USDA. Accordingly, the
standards have not been published in a final form for use. I
hope this information is helpful.
Please let me know if further information is needed.
Thanks,
William T. Sessions
Associate Deputy Administrator
Livestock and Seed Program
-----Original Message-----
From: jonball@[...]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 11:38 AM
To: Sessions, William
Subject: 2003 proposed standards for meat marketing claims
I have read about the proposed standards, and I've seen
many of the public comments sent to USDA. I cannot find
anything to indicate if the standards were adopted.
Were the standards as proposed in 2003 adopted?
Thanks in advance.
Jonathan Ball
Pasadena, CA
___________________________________________________
Jonathan Ball aka Rudy Canoza 08 Sep 2005 http://bit.ly/2cYknsh
[end]
Jonathan Ball. Pasadena, CA. Priceless! That email, posted from Jonathan
Ball,
you, and the return email sent to Jonathan Ball proves beyond all doubt that
you are Jonathan Ball. Of course, you don't live in Pasadena since moving to
5327 Shepard Ave Sacramento, CA 95819-1731
Here's the proof Jonathan D Ball http://bit.ly/1LFy9t8
> and I won't die soon.
Jonathan Ball aka Rudy Canoza 08 Sep 2005 http://bit.ly/2cYknsh
[end]
Jonathan Ball. Pasadena, CA. Priceless! That email, posted from Jonathan
Ball,
you, and the return email sent to Jonathan Ball proves beyond all doubt that
you are Jonathan Ball. Of course, you don't live in Pasadena since moving to
5327 Shepard Ave Sacramento, CA 95819-1731
Here's the proof Jonathan D Ball http://bit.ly/1LFy9t8
Yeah you will. You're an old man who hasn't looked after himself. I wouldn't
go around goading people if I was as small and as puny as you are, liar Jon.
You ought to be very careful.
> You certainly have no means to hasten my death.
Are you really serious, weed? you're just over 5 feet tall and 64 years old.
You'll be 65 on December 2nd. You've got to stop threatening people and
goading them to come after you. You're pathetic.
radar range
Dec 31, 2016, 2:20:20 PM12/31/16
to
On 12/30/2016 6:58 PM, Frank Tomaszewski wrote:
> You made that bullshit up.
> You made that bullshit up.
radar range
Dec 31, 2016, 2:21:36 PM12/31/16
to
On 12/30/2016 7:21 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> I don't make shit up. I have the facts
Laugh, laugh, laugh, laugh!!!!
> I don't make shit up. I have the facts
radar range
Dec 31, 2016, 2:22:07 PM12/31/16
to
On 12/30/2016 7:21 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> Why are you ignorant
Why are you such an obese Beast?
radar range
Dec 31, 2016, 2:34:47 PM12/31/16
to
On 12/31/2016 5:55 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
> 'Crap. I wantz crap.'
You get what you earn, meth face.
0 new messages