Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

If guns are so great, then why is the NRA headquarters a gun free zone?

350 views
Skip to first unread message

Too_Many_Tools

unread,
Jan 11, 2013, 1:48:53 AM1/11/13
to
Freaking conservative cowards.....

TMT

Delvin Benet

unread,
Jan 11, 2013, 2:05:46 AM1/11/13
to
On 1/10/2013 10:48 PM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> [bullshit snipped]

It isn't.

Too_Many_Tools

unread,
Jan 11, 2013, 2:25:58 AM1/11/13
to
It is.

Try going in the building and see what happens.

TMT

max headroom

unread,
Jan 11, 2013, 3:23:30 AM1/11/13
to
Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:25feceef-fd47-484c...@h2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com:

> On Jan 11, 1:05 am, Delvin Benet <D...@nbc.n�t> wrote:

>> On 1/10/2013 10:48 PM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:

>>> [bullshit snipped]

>> It isn't.

> It is.

> Try going in the building and see what happens.

This has GOT to be the stupidest thing you've written yet, Jimmy!!!

You really think there are NO guns at NRA HQ?!?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhahahahahahahahahahahahahaha........

"What a maroon!" --Saint Bugs


C\"@invalid.invalid

unread,
Jan 11, 2013, 8:04:53 AM1/11/13
to
On 1/11/2013 2:25 AM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> It is.
>
> Try going in the building and see what happens.
>
> TMT

Actually, you are welcome to take your guns into the NRA headquarters
building and actually shoot them within the building.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Jan 11, 2013, 8:51:18 AM1/11/13
to
>""C <C\"@invalid.invalid> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
So, you're verifying that TMT is just a lying sack of shit?

[chuckle]

____
"We can make those precious guns of yours go away
with a few keystokes [sic] to the authorities."
-Unterscharführer Too Many Tools

"Considering that the Feds and the State can use Usenet IP addresses
to determine who owns firearms..."
-Net Detektuv Too Many Tools 5/28/12

Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E

unread,
Jan 11, 2013, 9:05:26 AM1/11/13
to
On Jan 11, 12:48 am, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Freaking conservative cowards.....
>
> TMT

If guns are so horrible why is Obama and his nigletts surrounded by
them?

C\"@invalid.invalid

unread,
Jan 11, 2013, 12:17:12 PM1/11/13
to
On 1/11/2013 8:51 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> So, you're verifying that TMT is just a lying sack of shit?
>
> [chuckle]

Just pointing out, in order to access the public range within the NRA
headquarters building, an individual would have to carry a firearm
inside the structure.
You can draw your own conclusions about TMT. <G>

Too_Many_Tools

unread,
Jan 11, 2013, 1:31:59 PM1/11/13
to
Only the range...wander around in the building with your gun and see
what happens.

Gun free it is.

TMT

Too_Many_Tools

unread,
Jan 11, 2013, 1:33:05 PM1/11/13
to
On Jan 11, 7:51 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Considering that you wear a diaper I would say you fit the description
of a sack of shit.

Laugh..laugh..laugh...

TMT

Jeff M

unread,
Jan 11, 2013, 2:59:35 PM1/11/13
to
On 1/11/2013 2:23 AM, max headroom wrote:
> Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:25feceef-fd47-484c...@h2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com:
>
>> On Jan 11, 1:05 am, Delvin Benet <D...@nbc.nıt> wrote:
>
>>> On 1/10/2013 10:48 PM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>
>>>> [bullshit snipped]
>
>>> It isn't.
>
>> It is.
>
>> Try going in the building and see what happens.
>
> This has GOT to be the stupidest thing you've written yet, Jimmy!!!
>
> You really think there are NO guns at NRA HQ?!?

I think he's saying THEY have them, but you, as a visitor, cannot.

JohnJohnsn

unread,
Jan 11, 2013, 6:00:29 PM1/11/13
to
On Jan 11, 12:31 pm, Looney Liberal Democrat Jimmy E Anderson, a/k/a
"Too_Many_Tools" ("TMT") <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 11, 7:04 am, ""C <C\"@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 1/11/2013 2:25 AM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>
>>> It is.
>
>>> Try going in the building and see what happens.
>
>>> TMT
>
>> Actually, you are welcome to take your guns into the NRA headquarters
>> building and actually shoot them within the building.
>
NRA Headquarters Range

Hours of Operation
The NRA Range is open to the general public.
Sunday 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
Monday 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
Tuesday Closed for Action Events
Wednesday 5:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
Thursday 5:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
Friday 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.
Saturday 8:30 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.

Range Fees
The NRA Range is open to the general public. NRA members receive a
discount on range fees. (You can also sign up to join the NRA at the
range to receive the NRA Members' discount.)

•NRA Members - $14.00 per hour/per lane.
Additional NRA Member sharing a lane - $8.00 per hour/per lane.
•Non-members - $18.00 per hour/per lane.
Additional non-member sharing a lane - $12.00 per hour/per lane.
•Shooters under the age of 18 sharing a lane with an adult - FREE
Please call 703-267-1402 for additional requirements for minors coming
to the range.

http://nrahqrange.nra.org/
>
> Only the range...wander around in the building with your gun and see
> what happens.
>
> Gun free it is.
>
> TMT
>
When were you there, Jimmy?

Care to take and post a photo of a "No Guns for Visitors" sign on the
NRA HQ building?

BTW:

Fail. Less Than 200 Anti-Gun Leftists Turn Out for March on NRA
Headquarters in Washington DC

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/12/200-progressives-march-on-nra-headquarters-in-washington-dc/

<Chuckle> :)
---

"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are
neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make
things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they
serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed
man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man. "
--Thomas Jefferson

"False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousands real
advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience’ that would
take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown
in it; that has no remedy for evils, except destruction. The laws that
forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm
those only who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes."
--Cesare Bonesana, Marchese Beccaria, `Of Crimes and Punishments'

"Why is it that every time a lunatic uses a firearm to commit an
atrocity the gun-control fanatics want to punish the millions of gun
owners that DIDN'T do it?!?!?
--Me, Dec. 18, 2012...


Michael A. Terrell

unread,
Jan 11, 2013, 9:32:18 PM1/11/13
to

"Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E" wrote:
>
> On Jan 11, 12:48 am, Too_Many_Tools ?too_many_to...@yahoo.com? wrote:
> ? Freaking conservative cowards.....
> ?
> ? TMT
>
> If guns are so horrible why is Obama and his nigletts surrounded by
> them?

<http://www.newsmax.com/TheWire/obama-bush-secret-service/2013/01/11/id/471007?s=al&promo_code=11E78-1>

Tom Sr.

unread,
Jan 11, 2013, 9:50:50 PM1/11/13
to
On Jan 11, 9:32 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
wrote:
> <http://www.newsmax.com/TheWire/obama-bush-secret-service/2013/01/11/...>

NewMax?

Ha ha haha haha haha ha ha hahahaha ha haha haha haha ha hahahaha
hahaha Ha HaHaHa HaHa Ha HaHa HaHA HA HaHAHAHAHA HAHA HA
HAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA HAHAHA
HAHAHA HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHaHaHa HaHaHa HaHaHa
HaHaHaHaHahahaha haha hahahaha haha hahaha haha ha ha ha hee!

Why don't you quote something from the John Birch Society's "The New
American" magazine as well?
...


-----
-----
Please Note:

In select newsgroups this post will be followed by an out-of-date, cut-
and-paste, SHRIEKING ranting and raving by Bob Milby Jr., aka Patriot
Games, aka Buster Norris, aka 10,000s of Sockpuppets -- Winner of The
alt.usenet.kooks Awards: Palmjob Paddle (July 2008)*, KO0k of the
Month (Sept. 2012)**, and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet (Oct.
2012)!***

* This award is given to the person who gets spanked (as in,
thrashed) the most in a given month by other posters or even himself.
** Given to someone whose Kookery is judged to have surpassed all
others.
*** For those most prolific in the art of, abiet thinly,
disguising their net.presence behind whatever nose and glasses they
can concoct.

We hope to return you to more rational posting after this brief,
psychotic interruption.
------
------

Georgiana Mcknight

unread,
Jan 11, 2013, 7:48:30 PM1/11/13
to
Real name Fwanklin. Fwanklin is a famous homo. Fwanklin's 15 seconds
of fame came at a Star Trek Convention when he embarrassed the
audience, embarrassed America, embarrassed humanity and embarrassed
Gene Roddenberry by asking why Star Trek didn't have any faggot
characters. Fwanklin, after many beatings, has become just another
cock-slapped usenet zoo monkey. Liars, once they have been exposed,
frequently revert to behavior most similar to a zoo monkey who sits in
the cage throwing feces at passersby but saying nothing of value.

Franklin Hummel - born May 1953
18 Linwood St, Unit 3
Boston, Massachusetts 02119-1543
(617) 541-3834
E-mail: hum...@world.std.com
Possible Fag Butt-Buddy: Arnold D Thomas (Age 52)

Franklin Hummel - Supervisor
Boston Public Library
700 Boylston Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
(617) 536-5400
(617) 536-3813 Fax
www.bpl.org

http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Hummel_Franklin_61179943.aspx

[][][][][][]


The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"

[Courtesy of Buster Norris]

On Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:01:33 -0800 (PST), "Tom Sr."
<thomas.sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Dec 25, 10:41 pm, "Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey
>rd.,Wilmington,D.E" <burtonu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> "begging"?? HUH ??
>You do know that is treason?
>Look it up in our Constitution. It's there.

LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War
against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and
Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the
Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in
open Court."
The Constitution of the United States
Article III - The Judicial Branch
Section 3 - Treason
http://usconstitution.net/const.html

Posted from:
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/

RosemontCrest

unread,
Jan 11, 2013, 10:54:31 PM1/11/13
to
On 1/11/2013 6:50 PM, Tom Sr. wrote:
> On Jan 11, 9:32 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
> wrote:
>> <http://www.newsmax.com/TheWire/obama-bush-secret-service/2013/01/11/...>
>
> NewMax?
>
> Ha ha haha haha haha ha ha hahahaha ha haha haha haha ha hahahaha
> hahaha Ha HaHaHa HaHa Ha HaHa HaHA HA HaHAHAHAHA HAHA HA
> HAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA HAHAHA
> HAHAHA HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHaHaHa HaHaHa HaHaHa
> HaHaHaHaHahahaha haha hahahaha haha hahaha haha ha ha ha hee!
>
> Why don't you quote something from the John Birch Society's "The New
> American" magazine as well?

Bill H.R. 6620, introduced during 11/30/2012 as the "Former Presidents
Protection Act of 2012," was passed by congress then subsequently signed
into law by the president during 01/10/2013.

Your feeble attempt to discredit the source does not change the fact
contained within the message.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d112:2:./temp/~bdvInp::|/home/LegislativeData.php?n=BSS;c=112|


Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Jan 12, 2013, 7:48:37 AM1/12/13
to
>Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

>On Jan 11, 7:51 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
>wrote:
>> >""C <C\"@invalid.invalid> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>> >On 1/11/2013 2:25 AM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>> >> It is.
>>
>> >> Try going in the building and see what happens.
>>
>> >> TMT
>>
>> >Actually, you are welcome to take your guns into the NRA headquarters
>> >building and actually shoot them within the building.
>>
>> So, you're verifying that TMT is just a lying sack of shit?
>>
>> [chuckle]
>>
>> ____
>> "We can make those precious guns of yours go away
>> with a few keystokes [sic] to the authorities."
>>                        -Unterscharführer Too Many Tools
>>
>> "Considering that the Feds and the State can use Usenet IP addresses
>> to determine who owns firearms..."
>>                         -Net Detektuv Too Many Tools  5/28/12
>
>Considering that you [..]

Once again showed you're just a lying sack of shit. Old news, though.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Jan 12, 2013, 7:49:00 AM1/12/13
to
>Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

We'll take your word for it. Not.

Gunner

unread,
Jan 12, 2013, 9:31:59 AM1/12/13
to
Gunning for revolution

Exclusive: Larry Klayman says executive-order on firearms would be
'the final straw'


Since the fraudulent re-election of Barack Hussein Obama as president
– the “mullah in chief” not eligible to be president as he is not a
natural born citizen – he has thrown his weight around as if he were
our king.

First, virtually unopposed by a functionally dead Republican
opposition, Obama rammed down the people’s throats considerable income
tax increases to modest and top income earners and small businesses,
increased the capital gains and estate taxes and eliminated so called
loopholes in the tax code – all to socialize the American economy by
having these individuals and businesses “pay their fair share” as
punishment for their success in a heretofore capitalist system. Now,
like drunken sailors, Obama and his socialist flunkies on Capitol
Hill, notably House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority
Leader Harry Reid, promise that more tax hikes are on the way to
further their march toward dismantling our free-market freedoms and
the body politic of the nation.

Then, our first Muslim president cleverly nominated former Republican
Sen. Chuck Hagel to be the next secretary of defense, a man who while
senator had a “proven” track record as not only an anti-Semite and
hater of Jews and Israel, but also advocated rolling over to the
neo-Nazi mullahs in Iran. Hagel repeatedly not only mocked and
disparaged the so-called “Jewish lobby” that defends Israel in
Washington, D.C., but also advocated not imposing sanctions, however
worthless in any event, on Tehran for its onward and unchecked march
to acquiring atomic weapons, which the Islamic regime’s leaders have
said they will use to wage a holocaust against the Jewish state and
its people. Hagel is a truly repugnant man who fits in well with
Obama’s own not too latent anti-Semitism and antipathy toward Jews and
true Christians in general.

Incredibly, even the so-called Jewish lobby – headed by the American
Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), whose current president, Lee
Rosenberg, is a sleazy “Chicago pol” and, not surprisingly, a friend
of Obama – has rolled over to Hagel, and AIPAC has been rendered
impotent in the upcoming confirmation hearing.

Finally, in the words of former Obama chief of staff and current
Chicago mayor, Rahm Emanuel, not letting any good tragedy go to waste,
our fraudulent president – by his own threats and through Vice
President Joe Biden – has promised to his leftist supporters to act
unilaterally and issue executive orders to extinguish or curb the
right to bear arms guaranteed to all Americans by our Founding Fathers
under the Second Amendment to the Constitution. The pretextual
“trigger” for this: the recent tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary School
in Newtown, Conn., where young children were murdered by a mentally
sick adolescent who somehow obtained control of his similarly murdered
mother’s firearms.

To lay the foundation for this unilateral act of defiance, abuse and
usurpation of our rights, immediately after the Sandy Hook tragedy
Obama announced and designated a so-called Gun Control Task Force, to
be headed by “his pliant imbecile,” Joe Biden. Since then, this task
force, which constitutes an advisory committee under the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (“FACA”) (Pub. L. 92-463, 6 Oct. 1972), has met
with special interests on both sides of the gun-control issue. The
problem is, however, that these meetings are illegal, since they have
not been announced with the 15 days notice required by the FACA law,
and have excluded ordinary citizens. Instead the meetings are limited
to special-interest lobbyists who are adept at lining the pockets of
the Washington, D.C., political and legal establishment.

On Jan. 7, 2013, I filed a FACA request with the Office of the
President demanding access to these meetings on behalf of not just
myself as chairman and general counsel of Freedom Watch, but also all
Americans who desire to participate. Predictably, I have not heard
back from either Obama or his surrogates, so in the next few days we
will be forced to file a lawsuit over this blatant violation of the
rule of law. (Years ago, during the George W. Bush administration,
when Vice President Cheney refused to open up his meeting with
lobbyists on energy policy, I filed a lawsuit that made it all the way
to the Supreme Court.) The people simply have a right under FACA and
our Constitution to be privy to closed-door meetings with special
interests who, without oversight, will pervert our legal rights to
serve their own interests.

But quite apart from FACA and open government – to use the term
government loosely these days, since in practice we no longer have a
republic but a despotic monarchy – Obama’s threats to use executive
orders to remove or curtail our right to bear arms constitutes the
final straw. It is in effect a declaration of war against the American
people and our way of life.

For our Founding Fathers bequeathed to us the right to bear arms
primarily to protect us, should the need ever arise, against a
tyrannical government. Their primary motive was not to allow us to
defend ourselves against random criminals and madmen like Adam Lanza,
however useful guns would have been and are in this regard.

So when Obama and Biden effectively threatened to seize our guns, or
even just curtail our rights to gun ownership, they are making the
same mistake King George III made when he sent his armies to seize and
destroy the weapons caches of the colonies, which they had amassed to
defend themselves against a British crown that had also raised their
taxes without representation in parliament and committed other acts of
tyranny. This gun grab by the king was the final straw before
revolution, triggering the Declaration of Independence and subsequent
war.

The irony today, as it was in 1776, is that that these miscalculations
by our rulers will in the end serve to be their own undoing and result
in our liberation from their evil clutches. Let us pray that Obama and
Biden and the likes of Pelosi and Reid are so stupid as to carry
through with their threats, so that the masses will finally be
provoked to rise up as they did in colonial times. It is time that
their political ilk be legally removed from our nation’s capital –
along with their Republican accomplices like Chuck Hagel – before the
nation is totally transformed and destroyed.

These arrogant, malevolent, political tyrants should thus take heed
and beware of the words of our Founding Fathers in the Declaration of
Independence, that “In every stage of these Oppressions We have
Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms. Our repeated
Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose
character is thus marked by every act that may define a Tyrant, is
unfit to be ruler of a free people.”



The methodology of the left has always been:

1. Lie
2. Repeat the lie as many times as possible
3. Have as many people repeat the lie as often as possible
4. Eventually, the uninformed believe the lie
5. The lie will then be made into some form oflaw
6. Then everyone must conform to the lie

Gunner

unread,
Jan 12, 2013, 9:32:55 AM1/12/13
to
Journalists reject personal 'gun-free zone' signs
Many media personalities have their own armed guards

Although many members of the news media publicly endorse officially
designating schools, movie theaters and other venues as “gun-free
zones,” you’d never know it from their private actions.

Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe – best known for his devastating
2009 undercover video exposé of ACORN, and many other hidden-camera
scoops, including a recent video of a Democrat campaign operative
plotting vote fraud – says many media members are reluctant to
proclaim their support for “gun-free zones” if it gets too close to
home.

The project already is viral, with thousands on a Facebook page about
it, even though the video is not yet available.

O’Keefe’s crew asked journalists working for CNN, MSNBC and others
whether they would put a sign in their lawn that says “Citizens
Against Senseless Violence. THIS HOME IS PROUDLY GUN FREE!”

“No journalist wanted the sign,” he says. “Many journalists had armed
guards.”

“We also showed up at Eric Holder’s house,” O’Keefe added.
“Authorities came to protect him.”

“Incidentally, the sign was left on only one person’s lawn (a
non-journalist we used as a decoy to legitimize across the street). …
Someone driving by later took a pic. It has now gone viral on Facebook
via pro-gun groups,” O’Keefe said.

The video that will result from the interviews and visits will be
released soon, he said.

Just before November’s election, Virginia’s State Board of Elections
asked state Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli to investigate a video
report that caught the field director for Democratic U.S. Rep. Jim
Moran’s campaign in an apparent conspiracy to commit election fraud.

That video sting first reported by WND, prompted the resignation of
Patrick Moran, who is Jim Moran’s son, and a criminal investigation by
the Arlington County Police Department in Northern Virginia, near
Washington, D.C.

Cuccinelli’s spokesman, Brian Gottstein, told WND the attorney
general’s office “will get with local law enforcement, which has
already been looking into the matter, and see what information they’ve
already gathered.”

“We could work side-by-side, or they could ask us to solely continue
the investigation,” he said.

Arlington County Police Department spokesman Dustin Sternbeck told WND
the department decided to launch an investigation into a possible
“election offense” by Patrick Moran after media reported the video
sting.

Washington Post columnist Christ Cillizza made Patrick Moran the
recipient of his “Worst Week in Washington” award” for “forgetting
that walking away is sometimes the best policy.”

As WND reported earlier, O’Keefe’s team captured on video a regional
director of a voter mobilization group launched by Barack Obama,
Organizing for America, helping an undercover reporter vote for the
president in two states. The director was fired after the video was
reported.

Leroy ProudEagle Garcia

unread,
Jan 12, 2013, 9:40:58 AM1/12/13
to
On 1/12/2013 6:31 AM, Gunner wrote:
> Gunning for revolution
>
> Exclusive: Larry Klayman says executive-order on firearms would be
> 'the final straw'
>
>
> Since the fraudulent re-election of Barack Hussein Obama as president

No.

Lions: 654398, Christians : 0

unread,
Jan 12, 2013, 9:49:37 AM1/12/13
to
On Friday, January 11, 2013 12:48:53 AM UTC-6, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> Freaking conservative cowards.....
>

The entire girlie man-boy gun hoarding culture wouldn't last a day where real gun nuts play .. like in Somalia.

These morons think a $1000 gun makes their little dicks appear bigger in the mirror.

This is how they appear to Real Americans :

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_NUZ_fM-TQKQ/Sf9PJCiSbLI/AAAAAAAANYI/wzO53XgcCrM/s400/cry_baby.jpg

Michael A. Terrell

unread,
Jan 12, 2013, 10:04:16 AM1/12/13
to

Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>
> >Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
> >On Jan 11, 7:04Â am, ""C <C\"@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >> On 1/11/2013 2:25 AM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> >>
> >> > It is.
> >>
> >> > Try going in the building and see what happens.
> >>
> >> > TMT
> >>
> >> Actually, you are welcome to take your guns into the NRA headquarters
> >> building and actually shoot them within the building.
> >
> >Only the range...wander around in the building with your gun and see
> >what happens.
> >
> >Gun free it is.
>
> We'll take your word for it. Not.


No one in their right mind would let a drooling maniac run around
with a gun, spouting all his garbage and I can't blame them. People, on
the other hand are no problem.

Too_Many_Tools

unread,
Jan 12, 2013, 9:12:54 PM1/12/13
to
On Jan 11, 1:23 pm, Delvin Benet <D...@nbc.nýt> wrote:
> Did you see where your ostensible ally and like-minded totalitarian
> left-wing extremist "whoblahblahkidding" said that you're a reckless,
> irresponsible, out-of-control lunatic who isn't trying to engage in
> serious and mature discussion?
>
>        Yeah [TMT] swings the hammer with plenty of flourish but that's
>        mostly because it drives gun nuts crazy *which is his goal*.
>
> You are not now and never have been trying to have serious and
> substantive discussion on any issue.  You're just a snarky, immature
> troll, with a goal of trying to piss off your ideological opponents -
> which is everyone to the right of the moderate left - rather than
> engaging in meaningful discussion with a goal of trying to change minds
> by making a strong case.  In essence, your own allies see you as nothing
> but a useful idiot.  Congratulations!

LOL...sounds like you are jealous as to how successful I am.

Every conservative in the land lies in bed at night unable to fall
asleep cursing my name.

Laugh..laugh..laugh...

TMT

Much Bigger Tools

unread,
Jan 12, 2013, 10:46:27 PM1/12/13
to
On 12 Jan 2013, Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> posted some
news:cd24c575-153d-4c6a...@k6g2000yqf.googlegroups.com:
On the contrary bumpkin, they laugh at you and take bets as to which one
will get the pleasure of skinning you alive.

Laugh..laugh..laugh...

> TMT
>

Harold Burton

unread,
Jan 12, 2013, 10:50:38 PM1/12/13
to
In article
<cd24c575-153d-4c6a...@k6g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>,
Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Jan 11, 1:23�pm, Delvin Benet <D...@nbc.n�t> wrote:
> > Did you see where your ostensible ally and like-minded totalitarian
> > left-wing extremist "whoblahblahkidding" said that you're a reckless,
> > irresponsible, out-of-control lunatic who isn't trying to engage in
> > serious and mature discussion?
> >
> > � � � �Yeah [TMT] swings the hammer with plenty of flourish but that's
> > � � � �mostly because it drives gun nuts crazy *which is his goal*.
> >
> > You are not now and never have been trying to have serious and
> > substantive discussion on any issue. �You're just a snarky, immature
> > troll, with a goal of trying to piss off your ideological opponents -
> > which is everyone to the right of the moderate left - rather than
> > engaging in meaningful discussion with a goal of trying to change minds
> > by making a strong case. �In essence, your own allies see you as nothing
> > but a useful idiot. �Congratulations!
>
> LOL...sounds like you are jealous as to what a fuckup I am.


snicker.

Gray Guest

unread,
Jan 13, 2013, 3:06:56 PM1/13/13
to
Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:49895990-2da1-41a2-
9544-37c...@10g2000yqo.googlegroups.com:

> Freaking conservative cowards.....
>
> TMT
>

And where exactly is that dickhead? It's in Fairfax VA. Where you can own
anything including Class III and CCW is a reality.

So what the fuck are you talking about?

Hey why don't you come visit, I can take you up to visit them and show you
how wrong you are.

Don't bother buying a roundtrip ticket though.

--
Refusenik #1

Libs suffer from Eleutherophobia. And there is no cure.

Obama called the SEALs and THEY got bin Laden. When the SEALs called Obama,
THEY GOT DENIED. Fuck Obama

Gray Guest

unread,
Jan 13, 2013, 3:07:16 PM1/13/13
to
Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:25feceef-fd47-484c-
9e8d-272...@h2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com:

> On Jan 11, 1:05�am, Delvin Benet <D...@nbc.n�t> wrote:
>> On 1/10/2013 10:48 PM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>>
>> > [bullshit snipped]
>>
>> It isn't.
>
> It is.
>
> Try going in the building and see what happens.
>
> TMT

And you would know this how?

Too_Many_Tools

unread,
Jan 13, 2013, 3:49:13 PM1/13/13
to
On Jan 13, 2:06 pm, Gray Guest <No_email_for_...@wahoo.com> wrote:
> Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:49895990-2da1-41a2-
> 9544-37cb30dc9...@10g2000yqo.googlegroups.com:
>
> > Freaking conservative cowards.....
>
> > TMT
>
> And where exactly is that dickhead? It's in Fairfax VA. Where you can own
> anything including Class III and CCW is a reality.
>
> So what the fuck are you talking about?
>
> Hey why don't you come visit, I can take you up to visit them and show you
> how wrong you are.
>
> Don't bother buying a roundtrip ticket though.
>
> --
> Refusenik #1
>
> Libs suffer from Eleutherophobia. And there is no cure.
>
> Obama called the SEALs and THEY got bin Laden. When the SEALs called Obama,
> THEY GOT DENIED. Fuck Obama

Yep...a gun free zone.

Freaking conservative hypocritical COWARDS.

TMT

Too_Many_Tools

unread,
Jan 13, 2013, 3:50:14 PM1/13/13
to
On Jan 13, 2:07 pm, Gray Guest <No_email_for_...@wahoo.com> wrote:
> Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:25feceef-fd47-484c-
> 9e8d-2722d3a71...@h2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com:
>
> > On Jan 11, 1:05 am, Delvin Benet <D...@nbc.nýt> wrote:
> >> On 1/10/2013 10:48 PM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>
> >> > [bullshit snipped]
>
> >> It isn't.
>
> > It is.
>
> > Try going in the building and see what happens.
>
> > TMT
>
> And you would know this how?
>
> --
> Refusenik #1
>
> Libs suffer from Eleutherophobia. And there is no cure.
>
> Obama called the SEALs and THEY got bin Laden. When the SEALs called Obama,
> THEY GOT DENIED. Fuck Obama

Because I KNOW.

And typical for a conservative coward like you to be ignorant of even
the basic gun facts of the NRA.

TMT

Andy F. Garcia

unread,
Jan 13, 2013, 4:12:12 PM1/13/13
to
On 13 Jan 2013, Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> posted some
news:41da214a-7646-4003...@h2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/01/13/france-north-
mali/1829993/

BAMAKO, Mali (AP) — France claimed new successes in its campaign to oust
Islamist extremists from northern Mali on Sunday, bombarding the major
city of Gao with airstrikes targeting the airport and training camps used
by the al-Qaeda-linked rebel group controlling the city.

France's foreign minister also said the 3-day-old intervention is gaining
international support, with communications and transport help from the
United States and backing from Britain, Denmark and other European
countries.

The French-led effort to take back Mali's north from the extremists
occupying it has included airstrikes by jets and combat helicopters on at
least four northern towns, of which Gao is the largest. Some 400 French
troops have been deployed to the country in the all-out effort to win back
the territory from the well-armed rebels, who seized control of an area
larger than France itself following a coup in Mali nine months ago.

"French fighter jets have identified and destroyed this Sunday, Jan. 13,
numerous targets in northern Mali near Gao, in particular training camps,
infrastructure and logistical depots which served as bases for terrorist
groups," the French Defense Ministry said in a statement.

Residents of Gao confirmed that the targets included the city's airport,
as well as the building that served as the base for the town's feared
Islamist police, which — in their adherence to a strict version of Muslim
law — have carried out numerous punishments including amputating limbs of
accused thieves.

Gao resident Abderahmane Dicko, a public school teacher, said he and his
neighbors heard the jets screaming across the sky between noon and 1 p.m.
local time.

"We saw the war planes circling. They were targeting the camps uses by the
Islamists. They only hit their bases. They didn't shoot at the
population," he said.

But the intervention has come with a human cost in the city of Konna, the
first to be bombed on Friday and Saturday. The town's mayor said that at
least 10 civilians were killed, including three children who threw
themselves into a river and drowned trying to avoid the falling bombs.

French President Francois Hollande authorized the military operation,
code-named "Serval" after a sub-Saharan wildcat, after it became clear
that the advancing rebels could push past the defenses in the town of
Mopti, the first town on the government-controlled side, which has the
largest concentration of Malian soldiers.

The decision catapulted the world and Mali's neighbors into a military
operation that diplomats had earlier said would not take place until at
least September. France's defense minister said they had no choice because
of the swift rebel advance.

On Saturday, the body representing nations in West Africa announced that
the member states would send hundreds of troops of their own, including at
least 500 each from Niger, Burkina Faso and Senegal, as well as from
Nigeria.

They will work alongside French special forces, including a contingent
that arrived Saturday in Bamako to secure the Malian capital against
retaliatory attacks by the al-Qaeda-linked groups occupying Mali's
northern half.

TV footage showed the French troops walking single-file out of the Bamako
airport, weapons strapped to their bodies or held over their shoulders,
like skis.

French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said the military effort succeeded
in blocking the advance that had prompted the intervention. "The Islamist
offensive has been stopped," Fabius said on RTL radio Sunday. "Blocking
the terrorists … we've done it."

He sought to stress that the operation is gaining international backing,
despite concern about the risks of the mission in a stretch of lawless
desert in weakly governed country. "We have the support of the Americans
for communications and transport," Fabius said, but gave no details.

U.S. officials have said they had offered to send drones to Mali and were
considering a broad range of options for assistance, including
information-sharing and possibly allowing limited use of refueling
tankers. British Prime Minister David Cameron also agreed to send aircraft
to help transport troops.

Andy F. Garcia

unread,
Jan 13, 2013, 4:12:14 PM1/13/13
to
On 13 Jan 2013, Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> posted some
news:b3cb3e21-13fc-498f...@d10g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:

http://www.businessinsider.com/obama-wont-use-14-amendment-2013-1

In order to be able to understand the current debt-limit battle in
Washington, here is the essential historical background:

The U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment states very clearly that “the
validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, ...
shall not be questioned.”

However, the so-called “debt limit,” as it’s currently known – which
violates that Amendment boldly – was instituted only in recent times.

It was instituted in 1995, by the Republican-majority U.S. Congress, when
Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich tried to coerce President Bill
Clinton to slash “entitlements”: Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.
He especially wanted to slash Medicare.

The solid-Republican congressional votes against increasing the debt-limit
in order to pay “the public debt of the United States, authorized by law”
did actually shut down the Federal Government for the first time in
history. It started on 14 November 1995 lasting for five days, and then
yet happened again on 16 December 1995 for 21 days.

During those two periods, “non-essential” government services were
suspended, while the “public debt of the United States, authorized by law”
continued to be honored.

The second federal shut-down ended on 6 January 1996, when the Republicans
finally passed and the President signed “Public Law 104-94,” a Joint
Resolution to raise the debt-limit. This action – which until then had
always been treated in Congress as routine – enabled the U.S. Government
to resume and continue to function, and the federal debt to continue to be
paid.

Between that time and now, congressional Republicans have insisted on
their right to violate this provision of the 14th Amendment, and
Democratic Presidents have not challenged that right.

While Republicans have been determined to cut “entitlements,” Democratic
Presidents have been ambivalent about it. That is: Presidents Clinton and
Obama have shown by their actions that they didn’t and don’t want to use
the force of Constitutional law to counter Republicans’ force.

Clinton and Obama have accepted Republicans’ option to violate the
Constitution’s provision that “the validity of the public debt of the
United States, authorized by law, ... shall not be questioned.”

During an early-December White House “Press Briefing by Press Secretary
Jay Carney, 12/06/2012,” the President’s Press Secretary was asked
“whether the President would invoke executive power and the 14th
Amendment,” and Mr. Carney responded: “This administration does not
believe that the 14th Amendment gives the President the power to ignore
the debt ceiling – period.”

In other words: Barack Obama was now officially on record as removing that
weapon from the available arsenal in his negotiations with congressional
Republicans about the debt limit. They could now quote him as agreeing
with them, that the change in congressional custom that had taken place on
this matter in 1995 was simply Congress’s assumption of a power that
Congresses had always had – nothing violating the Constitution at all.

Barack Obama had previously caved to the Republicans without fighting,
concerning his elimination of the public option from his “Obamacare.” More
recently, he broke his long-made promise never to compromise on increasing
taxes on the top 2%, $250,000+, and he had also chosen not to hold
Republicans’ feet to the fire on the fiscal cliff. Now, the only thing
that realistically remained in his arsenal of weaponry against
Republicans’ forcing slashes in Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid,
regulatory enforcement, and many other vital government programs, was
simply handed away by him, even well before the fiscal cliff came on
January 1st.

Clearly, therefore, Mr. Obama is determined to give Republicans much of
what they want on these matters. He evidently wants to find a way to allow
that to happen. He wants House Republicans to be able to block the Federal
Government from paying its previously contracted debts, so as to force him
to cut “entitlements.”

On all prior occasions in which Obama has caved on vital details before
even negotiating with Republicans about them, he had the public on his
side but caved by his own choice. Polls showed about a 2-to-1 support for
the availability of a public option; polls showed about a 2-to-1 support
for the $250,000 benchmark for increasing tax-rates.

But Obama caved on those matters because he had lied to Democrats – and
even to many moderate Republicans – about those claimed goals of his, and
his actions showed that he actually agreed more with the goals of
congressional Republicans on these issues than he did with Democrats and
others who, in poll-after-poll on them, showed that they agreed with his
stated (and even promised) positions on them.

Now he is repeating this same behavior, regarding cuts to “entitlements.”
Yet again, polls show that the public rejects raising the retirement age,
reducing the inflation-measure in calculating benefits, and the other
Republican-pushed measures; but Obama is doing all he can to help
congressional Republicans get what they want on these issues.

Barack Obama had, even earlier, driven Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid to fits
with his back-door efforts to gut such “entitlements,” as when he had
appointed the conservative Democrat Erskine Bowles to serve opposite the
extremely conservative Republican Alan Simpson as being the two co-chairs
on the White House’s “bi-partisan” federal debt commission concerning
entitlement “reform.” (The Commission produced recommendations that
congressional Democrats roundly repudiated for slashing entitlements, and
that Republicans condemned for increasing taxes.)

Obama had set this Commission up to deal with the soaring federal deficits
that had been caused by Bush’s 2008 economic collapse, by their using
those federal deficits as an excuse to slash entitlements and thus produce
even more suffering for the poor, at the same time as Wall Street was
being bailed out. (Bowles was supported by the very Wall Street banks that
were being bailed out by taxpayers. Simpson was a born conservative who
followed in his father’s footsteps as Wyoming’s Republican U.S. Senator.
His father had been quite extreme: “one of six Republican senators who
voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964.”)

So, that was a wolf-in-charge-of-chicken-coop type of operation, which
congressional Democrats opposed. Republicans opposed it because it would
have meant increasing taxes – it wasn’t conservative enough for them.
Thus, on the very same day, 28 March 2012, when Bowles-Simpson was finally
dashed in the House, the House passed instead the Paul Ryan budget, which
Mitt Romney ended up running on, against Obama. The 2012 “election” was
thus between two conservatives, one of whom pretended not to be.

Yet again, Pelosi and Reid are tearing their hair out about Obama’s
deceits and his preemptory caves on vital issues. On January 4th, Pelosi
in her weekly press briefing was asked about using the 14th Amendment to
annihilate the Republicans’ threats to violate the 14th Amendment, and
Pelosi said, “I’ve made my view very clear on that subject. But I’m not
the president of the United States.”

On the same day, Ryan Grim at huffingtonpost bannered “Harry Reid Would
Back Obama If He Bucks GOP On Debt Ceiling: Source.” Reid “has privately
told other Democrats, including President Obama, that if the
administration used its constitutional and executive authority to continue
paying its debts in the face of House Republican opposition, he would
support the approach.”

The way this would work is: Republicans would repeat the 1995 shut-down
cliff-hanger, and President Obama would cite the 14th Amendment, and
possibly also the trillion-dollar-coin tactic, to continue paying the U.S.
Government’s debts; and the matter would then go to the Supreme Court to
be adjudicated.

But Obama has already, through his Press spokesperson, said that he won’t
use the 14th Amendment. That will leave only the coin-tactic, which is
less likely to succeed. He has already publicly trashed his biggest
weapon.

Consequently, Nancy Pelosi on Sunday January 6th pressed the matter
further, and said on CBS' "Face the Nation," that, "If I were president,
I'd use the 14th Amendment," and she – even more importantly – explained
there why. She is, thus, for the very first time publicly, effectively
challenging the nominal head of her Democratic Party, the Republican
“Democratic” U.S. President Barack Obama, to indicate now whether he
intends to continue to stab Democrats in the back, as he has been doing
ever since he was elected and chose Timothy Geithner, Eric Holder, etc.,
and continued many of his predecessor’s policies that he had campaigned
against.

Pelosi is doing this at this time, because Obama’s “Fiscal Cliff” deal
inexplicably discarded Obama’s politically popular claimed proposal on
taxes and handed Republicans a needless win “against” him on federal
taxes, and because Obama’s shocking December 6th repudiation of the
powerful 14th-Amendment argument for blocking Republican efforts to employ
the debt ceiling as a weapon to “force” him to strip Democratic programs
on the expense side – Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and regulatory
enforcement – now threatens to hand Republicans a total victory on fiscal
matters, which would be too much for congressional Democrats to stomach in
abject silence, especially since polls show strong public support for the
Democratic position on both the tax and spending sides of these matters.

There is thus now a Democratic Party rebellion against Obama, and he will
soon show by his actions – no longer just his words – whether he is a
Democrat, and whether his Republican actions in the past have reflected,
on his part, stupidity, rather than actual treachery.

Democrats in Congress cannot publicly say that they despise a Democrat in
the White House, but the signs indicate that they do. On the other hand,
what will be their response if the President continues along this path?
Continuing on this path would be far worse than anything that happened
during the Clinton years. There is no way of knowing, ahead of time, what
would happen if he does that.

Too_Many_Tools

unread,
Jan 13, 2013, 7:55:48 PM1/13/13
to
> TMT- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I'm surprised that you didn't know the NRA shit hole was gun free...do
you even own a gun?

TMT

Gray Guest

unread,
Jan 13, 2013, 8:28:31 PM1/13/13
to
Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:b3cb3e21-13fc-498f-
b31e-a87...@d10g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:

> On Jan 13, 2:07�pm, Gray Guest <No_email_for_...@wahoo.com> wrote:
>> Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:25feceef-fd47-
484
> c-
>> 9e8d-2722d3a71...@h2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com:
>>
>> > On Jan 11, 1:05�am, Delvin Benet <D...@nbc.n�t> wrote:
>> >> On 1/10/2013 10:48 PM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>>
>> >> > [bullshit snipped]
>>
>> >> It isn't.
>>
>> > It is.
>>
>> > Try going in the building and see what happens.
>>
>> > TMT
>>
>> And you would know this how?
>>
>> --
>> Refusenik #1
>>
>> Libs suffer from Eleutherophobia. And there is no cure.
>>
>> Obama called the SEALs and THEY got bin Laden. When the SEALs called
Obam
> a,
>> THEY GOT DENIED. Fuck Obama
>
> Because I KNOW.
>
> And typical for a conservative coward like you to be ignorant of even
> the basic gun facts of the NRA.
>
> TMT

Really fuckwit? I've been in the NRA headquartes building. With a gun.

Stupid is as stupid lies.

Gray Guest

unread,
Jan 13, 2013, 8:37:42 PM1/13/13
to
Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:41da214a-7646-4003-
b96b-011...@h2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com:
On what do you base this? I've been in NRA headquarters. With a gun.

So we have me, who has actually done it.

And we have you who is a devolved lieing piece of crap coward. Who has
never been to the NRA headquarters and more then likely has never been to
Virginia and most certainly has never gotten out of his mommy's basement.

Now, who should anybody beleive?

Harold Burton

unread,
Jan 13, 2013, 9:16:53 PM1/13/13
to
In article <lvmdnT_ivttWJHLN...@giganews.com>,
Delvin Benet <DB@nbc.n�t> wrote:

> On 1/10/2013 10:48 PM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> > [bullshit snipped]
>
> It isn't.


don't confuse idiot leftards with inconvenient facts.

Harold Burton

unread,
Jan 13, 2013, 9:16:24 PM1/13/13
to


Just to give idiot leftards like you something to whine about.


laugh . . . laugh . . . laugh.

Harold Burton

unread,
Jan 13, 2013, 9:17:26 PM1/13/13
to
In article
<25feceef-fd47-484c...@h2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Jan 11, 1:05�am, Delvin Benet <D...@nbc.n�t> wrote:
> > On 1/10/2013 10:48 PM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> >
> > > [bullshit snipped]
> >
> > It isn't.
>
> It is.
>
> Try going in the building and see what happens.


I did.

Harold Burton

unread,
Jan 13, 2013, 9:21:27 PM1/13/13
to
In article
<49895990-2da1-41a2...@10g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,
Too_Many_Drools <too_man...@yahoo.com> lied through his teeth:

> Freaking conservative cowards.....



http://nrahqrange.nra.org/


Leftards, batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.

Harold Burton

unread,
Jan 13, 2013, 9:23:38 PM1/13/13
to
In article <lvmdnT_ivttWJHLN...@giganews.com>,
Delvin Benet <DB@nbc.n�t> wrote:

> On 1/10/2013 10:48 PM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> > [bullshit snipped]
>


> It isn't.



Indeed.


http://nrahqrange.nra.org/


but leftards like TMT are reduced to lying to try to prove their stupid
points.


snicker

Too_Many_Tools

unread,
Jan 13, 2013, 11:36:06 PM1/13/13
to
On Jan 13, 7:37 pm, Gray Guest <No_email_for_...@wahoo.com> wrote:
> Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:41da214a-7646-4003-
> b96b-0115c56ea...@h2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com:
> THEY GOT DENIED. Fuck Obama- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

No you haven't...you're still working on getting a refund from Herman
"The Perv" Cain.

Maybe he will give you a Larry Craig special instead.

TMT

Too_Many_Tools

unread,
Jan 13, 2013, 11:36:21 PM1/13/13
to
On Jan 13, 7:28 pm, Gray Guest <No_email_for_...@wahoo.com> wrote:
> Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:b3cb3e21-13fc-498f-
> b31e-a87d8eb68...@d10g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 13, 2:07 pm, Gray Guest <No_email_for_...@wahoo.com> wrote:
> >> Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:25feceef-fd47-
> 484
> > c-
> >> 9e8d-2722d3a71...@h2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com:
>
> THEY GOT DENIED. Fuck Obama- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

So are the NRA bathrooms where Larry Craig and you hang out these
days?

Bet he gave you a Utah special.

TMT

Delvin Benet

unread,
Jan 14, 2013, 12:11:55 AM1/14/13
to
> No you haven't...you're still working on

Obama took a dump on the SEALs.

Gray Guest

unread,
Jan 14, 2013, 8:53:47 PM1/14/13
to
Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:b69f98c4-0367-41b5-
8692-107...@f8g2000yqa.googlegroups.com:
>> THEY GOT DENIED. Fuck Obama- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> No you haven't...you're still working on getting a refund from Herman
> "The Perv" Cain.
>
> Maybe he will give you a Larry Craig special instead.
>
> TMT
>

Yeah well try to have an adult conversation with a mental patient and look
what happens.

Harold Burton

unread,
Jan 14, 2013, 9:16:04 PM1/14/13
to
In article
<b69f98c4-0367-41b5...@f8g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
gotta love leftards.

So much for their alleged acceptance of alternative lifestyles.


Total hypocrites.



snicker

Michael A. Terrell

unread,
Jan 15, 2013, 7:33:43 PM1/15/13
to

Gray Guest wrote:
>
> On what do you base this? I've been in NRA headquarters. With a gun.


Yet you are not allowed to take any weapon into any VA facility.

Too_Many_Tools

unread,
Jan 18, 2013, 6:32:01 AM1/18/13
to
On Jan 11, 12:48 am, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Freaking conservative cowards.....
>
> TMT

Well considering all the attempts conservatives have been making to
divert the attention from the original subject, it would seem that
they do not have an answer to why the NRA headquarters are a gun free
zone.

It also tells us that guns are really that great....they can and will
kill you.

TMT

AmyLeVere

unread,
Jan 18, 2013, 6:49:47 AM1/18/13
to


"Too_Many_Tools" wrote in message
news:88fc4b8c-9bd6-4e28...@x3g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...

On Jan 11, 12:48 am, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Freaking conservative cowards.....
>
> TMT

Well considering all the attempts conservatives have been making to
divert the attention from the original subject, it would seem that
they do not have an answer to why the NRA headquarters are a gun free
zone.

>^^^^
You are a retard. You lied. I told you last week that there is an indoor
shooting range there.
http://nrahqrange.nra.org/

JohnJohnsn

unread,
Jan 18, 2013, 7:00:48 AM1/18/13
to too_man...@yahoo.com
On Jan 18, 5:32 am, Jimmy Anderson, a/k/a "Too_Many_Tools" (and "TMT")
<too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 11, 12:48 am, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Freaking conservative cowards.....
>
>> TMT
>
> Well considering all the attempts conservatives have been making
> to divert the attention from the original subject, it would seem that
> they do not have an answer to why the NRA headquarters are a gun
> free zone.
>
Damn, Jimmy; you really _are_ as stupid as you appear here in Usenet;
aren't you?

[Original posting]

Newsgroups: misc.survivalism, rec.crafts.metalworking,
talk.politics.guns, alt.politics, alt.rush-limbaugh
From: JohnJohnsn <TopCop1...@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:00:29 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Jan 11 2013 5:00 pm
Subject: Re: If guns are so great, then why is the NRA headquarters a
gun free zone?

On Jan 11, 12:31 pm, Looney Liberal Democrat Jimmy E Anderson, a/k/a
"Too_Many_Tools" ("TMT") <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 11, 7:04 am, ""C <C\"@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 1/11/2013 2:25 AM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>>
>>> It is.
>>>
>>> Try going in the building and see what happens.
>>>
>>> TMT
>>
>> Actually, you are welcome to take your guns into the NRA
>> headquarters building and actually shoot them within the building.
>
NRA Headquarters Range

Hours of Operation
The NRA Range is open to the general public.
Sunday 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
Monday 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
Tuesday Closed for Action Events
Wednesday 5:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
Thursday 5:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
Friday 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.
Saturday 8:30 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.

Range Fees
The NRA Range is open to the general public. NRA members receive a
discount on range fees. (You can also sign up to join the NRA at the
range to receive the NRA Members' discount.)

•NRA Members - $14.00 per hour/per lane.
Additional NRA Member sharing a lane - $8.00 per hour/per lane.
•Non-members - $18.00 per hour/per lane.
Additional non-member sharing a lane - $12.00 per hour/per lane.
•Shooters under the age of 18 sharing a lane with an adult - FREE
Please call 703-267-1402 for additional requirements for minors
coming
to the range.

http://nrahqrange.nra.org/
>
> Only the range...wander around in the building with your gun and see
> what happens.
>
> Gun free it is.
>
> TMT
>
When were you there, Jimmy?

Care to take and post a photo of a "No Guns for Visitors" sign on the
NRA HQ building?

BTW:

Fail. Less Than 200 Anti-Gun Leftists Turn Out for March on NRA
Headquarters in Washington DC

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/12/200-progressives-march-on-nra...

<Chuckle> :)
---
[/Original posting]

Well, Jimmy? :)

----

"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are
neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make
things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they
serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed
man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man. "
--Thomas Jefferson

"False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousands real
advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience’ that would
take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown
in it; that has no remedy for evils, except destruction. The laws that
forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm
those only who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes."
--Cesare Bonesana, Marchese Beccaria, `Of Crimes and Punishments'

"Why is it that every time a lunatic uses a firearm to commit an
atrocity the gun-control fanatics want to punish the millions of gun
owners that DIDN'T do it?!?!?
--Me, Dec. 18, 2012...




Too_Many_Tools

unread,
Jan 18, 2013, 7:06:22 AM1/18/13
to
LOL..God you conservatives are slow.

I said the NRA headquarters are a gun free zone..and it is.

Have your dog explain it to you after he gets done licking his balls.

TMT

Too_Many_Tools

unread,
Jan 18, 2013, 7:07:57 AM1/18/13
to
LOL...another slow one.

I guess you blame it on your impotence.

The NRA headquarters are a gun free zone...call them and ask.

Better yet have your dog call...you will just keep making those 900
sex phone calls.
TMT

AmyLeVere

unread,
Jan 18, 2013, 7:13:15 AM1/18/13
to


"Too_Many_Tools" wrote in message
news:ca953af5-1cdf-4e07...@x3g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
The Shooting range is INSIDE the headquarters, you retard.
How can a shooting range be gun free?
Have you been stealing Lookout's Ambien?

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Jan 18, 2013, 7:36:35 AM1/18/13
to
>JohnJohnsn <TopCo...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
ROFL

And TMT gets another well-deserved and well-placed bitch slapping.

Uncle Steve

unread,
Jan 18, 2013, 7:33:45 AM1/18/13
to
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 07:13:15AM -0500, AmyLeVere wrote:
>
>
> "Too_Many_Tools" wrote in message
> news:ca953af5-1cdf-4e07...@x3g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
>
> On Jan 18, 5:49 am, "AmyLeVere" <TheWander...@bass.gov> wrote:
> >"Too_Many_Tools" wrote in message
> >
> >news:88fc4b8c-9bd6-4e28...@x3g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
> >
> >On Jan 11, 12:48 am, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Freaking conservative cowards.....
> >
> >> TMT
> >
> >Well considering all the attempts conservatives have been making to
> >divert the attention from the original subject, it would seem that
> >they do not have an answer to why the NRA headquarters are a gun free
> >zone.
> >
> >>^^^^
> >
> >You are a retard. You lied. I told you last week that there is an indoor
> >shooting range there.http://nrahqrange.nra.org/
>
> LOL..God you conservatives are slow.
>
> I said the NRA headquarters are a gun free zone..and it is.
>
>
> The Shooting range is INSIDE the headquarters, you retard.
> How can a shooting range be gun free?
> Have you been stealing Lookout's Ambien?

Who gives a flying fuck about your bullshit nit-picking? Answer:
only those of II who cannot handle meaningful political discussions.


Regards,

Uncle Steve

--

"A principle familiar to propagandists is that the doctrines to be
instilled in the target audience should not be articulated: that would
only expose them to reflection, inquiry, and, very likely, ridicule.
The proper procedure is to drill them home by constantly presupposing
them, so that they become the very condition for discourse."
-- Noam Chomsky

Gunner

unread,
Jan 18, 2013, 8:59:10 AM1/18/13
to
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 07:13:15 -0500, "AmyLeVere"
<TheWan...@bass.gov> wrote:

>
>
>"Too_Many_Tools" wrote in message
>news:ca953af5-1cdf-4e07...@x3g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
>
>On Jan 18, 5:49 am, "AmyLeVere" <TheWander...@bass.gov> wrote:
>> "Too_Many_Tools" wrote in message
>>
>> news:88fc4b8c-9bd6-4e28...@x3g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> On Jan 11, 12:48 am, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Freaking conservative cowards.....
>>
>> > TMT
>>
>> Well considering all the attempts conservatives have been making to
>> divert the attention from the original subject, it would seem that
>> they do not have an answer to why the NRA headquarters are a gun free
>> zone.
>>
>> >^^^^
>>
>> You are a retard. You lied. I told you last week that there is an indoor
>> shooting range there.http://nrahqrange.nra.org/
>
>LOL..God you conservatives are slow.
>
>I said the NRA headquarters are a gun free zone..and it is.
>
>
>The Shooting range is INSIDE the headquarters, you retard.
>How can a shooting range be gun free?
>Have you been stealing Lookout's Ambien?

Brain damage so clearly shown is embarrassing to all the onlookers.

Well..it used to be, but since its nearly an exclusive malady of the
Left..its now funny as hell to watch.

<VBG>

Gunner

The methodology of the left has always been:

1. Lie
2. Repeat the lie as many times as possible
3. Have as many people repeat the lie as often as possible
4. Eventually, the uninformed believe the lie
5. The lie will then be made into some form oflaw
6. Then everyone must conform to the lie

Harold Burton

unread,
Jan 18, 2013, 12:12:24 PM1/18/13
to
In article <ecde3f4cde...@gmail.com>,
Uncle Steve <stev...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 07:13:15AM -0500, AmyLeVere wrote:
> >
> >
> > "Too_Many_Tools" wrote in message
> > news:ca953af5-1cdf-4e07...@x3g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > On Jan 18, 5:49 am, "AmyLeVere" <TheWander...@bass.gov> wrote:
> > >"Too_Many_Tools" wrote in message
> > >
> > >news:88fc4b8c-9bd6-4e28...@x3g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
> > >
> > >On Jan 11, 12:48 am, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Freaking conservative cowards.....
> > >
> > >> TMT
> > >
> > >Well considering all the attempts conservatives have been making to
> > >divert the attention from the original subject, it would seem that
> > >they do not have an answer to why the NRA headquarters are a gun free
> > >zone.
> > >
> > >>^^^^
> > >
> > >You are a retard. You lied. I told you last week that there is an indoor
> > >shooting range there.http://nrahqrange.nra.org/
> >
> > LOL..God you conservatives are slow.
> >
> > I said the NRA headquarters are a gun free zone..and it is.
> >
> >
> > The Shooting range is INSIDE the headquarters, you retard.
> > How can a shooting range be gun free?
> > Have you been stealing Lookout's Ambien?
>
> Who gives a flying fuck about your bullshit nit-picking?


From the leftard dictionary: Nit-picking, what we call it when we're
called on one of our many egregious lies.

Harold Burton

unread,
Jan 18, 2013, 12:13:23 PM1/18/13
to
In article <8cgif8l2hr6av43u2...@4ax.com>,
And notice it seems to have finally taken. He's suddenly gone missing.

Uncle Steve

unread,
Jan 18, 2013, 12:55:05 PM1/18/13
to
SSHHEE's probably gone to the doctor to get a horseshit refil.

Too_Many_Tools

unread,
Jan 18, 2013, 7:15:03 PM1/18/13
to
On Jan 11, 12:48 am, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Freaking conservative cowards.....
>
> TMT

Considering that gun loons don't even know that the NRA headquarters
were gun free, it clearly shows that owning a gun doesn't take
significant intelligence.

But America knew that.

TMT

Delvin Benet

unread,
Jan 18, 2013, 7:22:38 PM1/18/13
to
On 1/18/2013 4:15 PM, "swings the hammer with plenty of flourish", a
sophomoric liar, lied:

> On Jan 11, 12:48 am, "swings the hammer with plenty of flourish" lied:
>> Freaking conservative cowards.....
>>
>> TMT
>
> Considering that gun loons don't even know that the NRA headquarters
> were gun free

It isn't.

Too_Many_Tools

unread,
Jan 18, 2013, 7:36:39 PM1/18/13
to
On Jan 18, 11:13 am, Harold Burton <hal.i.bur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> In article <8cgif8l2hr6av43u2cd9dqh9ausgvvq...@4ax.com>,
>  Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > >JohnJohnsn <TopCop1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
> And notice it seems to have finally taken.  He's suddenly gone missing.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Gone missing?

More like couldn't stop laughing my ass at you conservative gun loons.

Hey Harold...have you finished giving your mother her bath yet?

Laugh..laugh..laugh..


TMT

Too_Many_Tools

unread,
Jan 18, 2013, 7:38:41 PM1/18/13
to
Sure it is.

The fact that you didn't know that tells me that you have NO smarts.

TMT

Uncle Steve

unread,
Jan 18, 2013, 8:26:21 PM1/18/13
to
Rarely in the historical record will II find an example of a group of
People who are as certain of their moral superiority,
As collectively self-assured of the primacy of their invincible ignorance,
And as thoroughly useless to any task other than
sucking at the government teat.

Too_Many_Tools

unread,
Jan 18, 2013, 9:41:32 PM1/18/13
to
>    -- Noam Chomsky- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I agree that the conservatives are like that...the recent election
showed us their end result.

TMT

Harold Burton

unread,
Jan 18, 2013, 10:15:05 PM1/18/13
to
In article
<e42c4b71-7b06-4bd1...@b8g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
> Hey Harold...have you finished giving my mother her bath yet?


That, and more inches than your father could manage



> Laugh..laugh..laugh..



Indeed.

Harold Burton

unread,
Jan 18, 2013, 10:16:25 PM1/18/13
to
In article <AO6dnQyM897OemTN...@giganews.com>,
Don't confuse idiot leftards with inconvient facts.

Harold Burton

unread,
Jan 18, 2013, 10:22:36 PM1/18/13
to
In article <82233035d8...@gmail.com>,
Uncle Steve <stev...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 04:36:39PM -0800, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> > On Jan 18, 11:13??am, Harold Burton <hal.i.bur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > In article <8cgif8l2hr6av43u2cd9dqh9ausgvvq...@4ax.com>,
> > > > >???NRA Members - $14.00 per hour/per lane.
> > > > >Additional NRA Member sharing a lane - $8.00 per hour/per lane.
> > > > >???Non-members - $18.00 per hour/per lane.
> > > > >Additional non-member sharing a lane - $12.00 per hour/per lane.
> > > > >???Shooters under the age of 18 sharing a lane with an adult - FREE
> > > > >Please call 703-267-1402 for additional requirements for minors
> > > > >coming
> > > > >to the range.
> > >
> > > > >http://nrahqrange.nra.org/
> > >
> > > > >> Only the range...wander around in the building with your gun and see
> > > > >> what happens.
> > >
> > > > >> Gun free it is.
> > >
> > > > >> TMT
> > >
> > > > >When were you there, Jimmy?
> > >
> > > > >Care to take and post a photo of a "No Guns for Visitors" sign on the
> > > > >NRA HQ building?
> > >
> > > > >BTW:
> > >
> > > > >Fail. Less Than 200 Anti-Gun Leftists Turn Out for March on NRA
> > > > >Headquarters in Washington DC
> > >
> > > > >http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/12/200-progressives-march-on-nra..
> > > > >.
> > >
> > > > ><Chuckle> :)
> > > > >---
> > > > >[/Original posting]
> > >
> > > > >Well, Jimmy? ??:)
> > >
> > > > ROFL
> > >
> > > > And TMT gets another well-deserved and well-placed bitch slapping.
> > >
> > > And notice it seems to have finally taken. ??He's suddenly gone missing.-
> > > Hide quoted text -
> > >
> > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > Gone missing?
> >
> > More like couldn't stop laughing my ass at you conservative gun loons.
> >
> > Hey Harold...have you finished giving your mother her bath yet?
> >
> > Laugh..laugh..laugh..
> >
> >
> > TMT
>
> Rarely in the historical record will II find an example of a group of
> People who are as certain of their moral superiority,
> As collectively self-assured of the primacy of their invincible ignorance,
> And as thoroughly useless to any task other than
> sucking at the government teat.


LOL!!!

Gotta love the stupidity of leftards.
0 new messages