Google 网上论坛不再支持新的 Usenet 帖子或订阅项。历史内容仍可供查看。

The Neal Boortz Independence Day Patriotic Quiz

已查看 52 次
跳至第一个未读帖子

Neal Boortz

未读,
2012年7月4日 10:10:502012/7/4
收件人
1. Forget when the Declaration of Independence was signed; instead,
explain why it was signed. What were the signers trying to accomplish?

2. What happened to the men who signed the Declaration? Did they go
on to be heroes and live happily ever after?

3. What does the Declaration of Independence say the people can do
when a government becomes destructive to the ends of liberty?

4. What would happen to anyone who tried today to alter or abolish
our government if it became destructive to idea that government derives
its powers from the consent of the governed?

5. Which articles of the Constitution grant specific powers to the
federal government?

6. What article of the Constitution restricts the powers of the
government to only those specifically set forth in the Constitution?

7. Describe the circumstances under which Francis Scott Key wrote
the words to the Star Spangled Banner?

8. Do you believe people living in a free country ought to be
compelled to recite a pledge of allegiance to that country? Why?

9. Was the Revolutionary War for independence from Great Britain
supported by a majority of the Colonists?

10. Where in our Constitution is it stated that anyone has a right to
vote for the office of President of the United States?

11. How did our original Constitution provide for the appointment of
Senators?

12. Most foreign countries appoint an ambassador to be their official
representative before the government of the United States. Who
officially represents the 50 state governments before the government of
the United States?

13. Explain the difference between a rule of law and the rule of man.

14. Explain the difference between a democracy and a constitutional
republic.

15. Was our country founded to be a country of majority rule?

16. Write a paragraph describing what life our country would be like
today if the majority did rule?

17. Aren't you glad the majority doesn't rule?



Do you believe that we need additional restrictions on who can vote? If
so, list the restrictions you would recommend.

18. Why does it matter in the grand scheme of things who the governor of
North Carolina is, unless you live in North Carolina?

19. Isn't a governor something you put on a state to keep it from moving
ahead very fast?

20. What possible benefit could you gain by memorizing the motto of the
State of North Carolina, or any other state for that matter?

21. How many times can the word "democracy" found in the Declaration of
Independence and the U.S. Constitution?

22. How many times can the word "democracy" found in the constitutions
of any of the 50 states?

23. What does this tell you?

24. Define "civil war."

25. Was the war between the northern and southern states in the
mid-1800s a civil war?

26. Who is third in the line of succession to the presidency?

27. Based on your answer to the foregoing question, how secure would you
demand additional Secret Service protection for the president and the
vice-president in the event the Democrats gain control of the House of
Representatives in the next election?

28. How did the political class manage to fool the people of the United
States into supporting a Constitutional Amendment creating an income
tax?

29. How do most people get their news on a daily bass?

30. Does the "freedom of press" clause in the First Amendment apply to
the broadcast media?

31. So, do most people get their news from agencies licensed to operate
by the federal government?

32. Why were the words "under God" placed into the Pledge of Allegiance?

33. Do you think that it is proper for the federal government to compel
students attending government schools under compulsory attendance laws
to acknowledge the role of God in the formation of our country? Would
this constitute "effecting an establishment of religion?" If not, why
not?

34. Do Americans derive their basic rights from the Constitution?

35. If we don't derive our rights from the Constitution, just why was
the Bill of Rights added anyway?

36. Define a system of government where the means of production are
owned and controlled privately.

37. Define a system of government where the means of production are
privately owned but controlled by government.

38. Define a system of government where the means of production are
owned and controlled by the government.

39. What percentage of total income is earned by the top one percent of
income earners.

40. What percentage of total income taxes collected by the federal
government is paid by the top one percent of income earners.

41. Where in our Constitution does it specifically state that only U.S.
citizens may vote for the office of President of the United States?

42. Name one function that a state government can exercise without
interference from the federal level.

43. Where in our Constitution does it specifically state that only U.S.
citizens may vote for members of the House of Representatives?

44. Look at the Bill of Rights. List any Amendments in the Bill of
Rights that were ratified for the purpose of limiting the powers of
government.

45. If our Constitution provides for equal protection under the law,
why, then, does the Voting Rights Act only apply to certain states who
were held in political disfavor in the 70's?

46. List any Amendments in the Bill of Rights that were ratified for the
purpose of limiting the rights of individuals.

47. If the Bill of Rights was written to limit the rights of government
and to guarantee certain rights in the individual, try to explain why so
many people seem to think that the 2nd Amendment was written to limit
the rights of individuals and guarantee the rights of government?

48. Does the First Amendment protect speech that some people might find
offensive?

49. Explain how our Republic was threatened when Janet Jackson showed
the world that she likes to wear a Japanese throwing star on the nipple
of her left breast. Or was it her right breast. Does it make any
difference?

50. What is the one exclusive power our government has that no
individual or business can legally exercise?

51. Now this list could be expanded to fill an entire book. I could,
for instance, add a hundred or so questions beginning with "Where does
the United States Constitution give the federal government the right to
.........." Fifty questions is enough, though, and it's time to finish
the Nuze and head to the studios.

It does occur to me that some of you high school and college government
teachers and instructors might have a bit of fun with these questions
and your students. No ... I'm not providing the answers.


Peter Franks

未读,
2012年7月4日 16:08:422012/7/4
收件人
On 7/4/2012 7:10 AM, Neal Boortz wrote:
> 1. Forget when the Declaration of Independence was signed; instead,
> explain why it was signed. What were the signers trying to accomplish?
>
> 2. What happened to the men who signed the Declaration? Did they go
> on to be heroes and live happily ever after?

Lol. No.

> 3. What does the Declaration of Independence say the people can do
> when a government becomes destructive to the ends of liberty?

Abolish it.

> 4. What would happen to anyone who tried today to alter or abolish
> our government if it became destructive to idea that government derives
> its powers from the consent of the governed?

Lol. Bring extra vaseline.

> 5. Which articles of the Constitution grant specific powers to the
> federal government?
>
> 6. What article of the Constitution restricts the powers of the
> government to only those specifically set forth in the Constitution?
>
> 7. Describe the circumstances under which Francis Scott Key wrote
> the words to the Star Spangled Banner?
>
> 8. Do you believe people living in a free country ought to be
> compelled to recite a pledge of allegiance to that country? Why?

No. They should be given the opportunity. Any patriot would willingly
take advantage of the opportunity.

> 9. Was the Revolutionary War for independence from Great Britain
> supported by a majority of the Colonists?
>
> 10. Where in our Constitution is it stated that anyone has a right to
> vote for the office of President of the United States?

I can't find it. Is voting a right, or a privilege? Sounds like a
privilege to me...

> 11. How did our original Constitution provide for the appointment of
> Senators?

The CORRECT way.

> 12. Most foreign countries appoint an ambassador to be their official
> representative before the government of the United States. Who
> officially represents the 50 state governments before the government of
> the United States?

No one. Ref. the fetid abortion we politely call Amendment XVII.

> 13. Explain the difference between a rule of law and the rule of man.
>
> 14. Explain the difference between a democracy and a constitutional
> republic.

Democracy: mob rule.

> 15. Was our country founded to be a country of majority rule?

Hell no!

> 16. Write a paragraph describing what life our country would be like
> today if the majority did rule?

EU.

> 17. Aren't you glad the majority doesn't rule?

Ah, in the end they do. Until we get fed up and nuke them.

> Do you believe that we need additional restrictions on who can vote? If
> so, list the restrictions you would recommend.

Demonstrable tax-paying full nationalized citizen of the United States.

> 18. Why does it matter in the grand scheme of things who the governor of
> North Carolina is, unless you live in North Carolina?
>
> 19. Isn't a governor something you put on a state to keep it from moving
> ahead very fast?

Lol. Remind me -- what exactly does the governor actually do? I mean
beside throwing parties and glad-handing?

> 20. What possible benefit could you gain by memorizing the motto of the
> State of North Carolina, or any other state for that matter?
>
> 21. How many times can the word "democracy" found in the Declaration of
> Independence and the U.S. Constitution?
>
> 22. How many times can the word "democracy" found in the constitutions
> of any of the 50 states?
>
> 23. What does this tell you?

People can't read.

People don't understand the just form of government.

Politicians can't read.

Politicians don't understand the just form of government.

(I list people and politicians separately because by and large,
politicians aren't people.)

> 24. Define "civil war."

Moronic contradictory term.

> 25. Was the war between the northern and southern states in the
> mid-1800s a civil war?

No.

> 26. Who is third in the line of succession to the presidency?
>
> 27. Based on your answer to the foregoing question, how secure would you
> demand additional Secret Service protection for the president and the
> vice-president in the event the Democrats gain control of the House of
> Representatives in the next election?
>
> 28. How did the political class manage to fool the people of the United
> States into supporting a Constitutional Amendment creating an income
> tax?
>
> 29. How do most people get their news on a daily bass?

Twitter. Makes for a bunch of twits.

Oh, and Jon Stewart.

> 30. Does the "freedom of press" clause in the First Amendment apply to
> the broadcast media?

It doesn't.

Follow-up question: what delegated authority empowers the feds to
control broadcast media (or the press for that matter)?

> 31. So, do most people get their news from agencies licensed to operate
> by the federal government?

What authority allows for the government to license?

> 32. Why were the words "under God" placed into the Pledge of Allegiance?

Blame it on the commies.

> 33. Do you think that it is proper for the federal government to compel
> students attending government schools under compulsory attendance laws
> to acknowledge the role of God in the formation of our country? Would
> this constitute "effecting an establishment of religion?" If not, why
> not?

Feds have no authority over education. Period. They can't compel squat
in the classroom.

> 34. Do Americans derive their basic rights from the Constitution?

NO RIGHT comes from the Constitution, Amendments, nor the Declaration of
Independence.

> 35. If we don't derive our rights from the Constitution, just why was
> the Bill of Rights added anyway?

It isn't a Bill of Rights, it is a Bill of Protections. Read the preamble.

> 36. Define a system of government where the means of production are
> owned and controlled privately.

Free market.

> 37. Define a system of government where the means of production are
> privately owned but controlled by government.

Communism.

> 38. Define a system of government where the means of production are
> owned and controlled by the government.

Communism.

> 39. What percentage of total income is earned by the top one percent of
> income earners.

Who cares?

> 40. What percentage of total income taxes collected by the federal
> government is paid by the top one percent of income earners.

Why should they pay proportionally more or less than me?

> 41. Where in our Constitution does it specifically state that only U.S.
> citizens may vote for the office of President of the United States?
>
> 42. Name one function that a state government can exercise without
> interference from the federal level.

Lol.

Unicorns exist too.

> 43. Where in our Constitution does it specifically state that only U.S.
> citizens may vote for members of the House of Representatives?
>
> 44. Look at the Bill of Rights. List any Amendments in the Bill of
> Rights that were ratified for the purpose of limiting the powers of
> government.

Well, that was the intent (ref. the preamble).

> 45. If our Constitution provides for equal protection under the law,
> why, then, does the Voting Rights Act only apply to certain states who
> were held in political disfavor in the 70's?
>
> 46. List any Amendments in the Bill of Rights that were ratified for the
> purpose of limiting the rights of individuals.

A right that can be limited is not a right.

By definition, a right is the authority to exercise a power without
infringement.

> 47. If the Bill of Rights was written to limit the rights of government
> and to guarantee certain rights in the individual, try to explain why so
> many people seem to think that the 2nd Amendment was written to limit
> the rights of individuals and guarantee the rights of government?

Government has no rights.

Ref. answer to 23.

> 48. Does the First Amendment protect speech that some people might find
> offensive?

It protects all speech within the right. And that is all speech that
does not substantially infringe on the rights of another.

> 49. Explain how our Republic was threatened when Janet Jackson showed
> the world that she likes to wear a Japanese throwing star on the nipple
> of her left breast. Or was it her right breast. Does it make any
> difference?

Janet who?

> 50. What is the one exclusive power our government has that no
> individual or business can legally exercise?
>
> 51. Now this list could be expanded to fill an entire book. I could,
> for instance, add a hundred or so questions beginning with "Where does
> the United States Constitution give the federal government the right to
> .........." Fifty questions is enough, though, and it's time to finish
> the Nuze and head to the studios.
>
> It does occur to me that some of you high school and college government
> teachers and instructors might have a bit of fun with these questions
> and your students. No ... I'm not providing the answers.

Government teachers are part of the problem, not the cure.

daniel.ru...@gmail.com

未读,
2012年7月5日 14:04:012012/7/5
收件人
No one should chant the Pledge of Allegiance because it was the origin of the Nazi salute and Nazi behavior. Photos and video show it performed exactly as the Nazi salute for 3 decades before German national socialists adopted the same behavior. The palm-down gesture resulted because Bellamy began the ritual chanting with the military salute that was then extended outward toward the flag. The persecuted children did not bother to turn the palm upward and eventually the military salute was dropped entirely, leaving the classic Nazi salute. The pledge continues to be the origin of such behavior (including flag fetishism), only the gesture has changed. Francis Bellamy (author of the pledge) and Edward Bellamy (his cousin and cohort) were American national socialists who influenced German national socialists, their rituals (mechanical chanting on command), dogma, and symbols (the swastika used to represent crossed S-letters for socialism), The above are discoveries made by the astounding historian Dr. Rex Curry. http://rexcurry.net

Peter Franks

未读,
2012年7月5日 14:18:072012/7/5
收件人
On 7/5/2012 11:04 AM, daniel.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
> No one should chant the Pledge of Allegiance because it was the origin of the Nazi salute and Nazi behavior.

Even if true, so what?

Let me ask the following hypotetical:

Suppose there is something good. If someone else models that good into
something else that is bad, does it then change the original good to bad?

You argue that it does. And that is a stupid argument to make.

Bert

未读,
2012年7月5日 14:41:592012/7/5
收件人
On the other hand, pledges of allegiance, especially to a flag and more
so when children are forced to chant them, come across as slightly
creepy and un-American.

--
be...@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN

Peter Franks

未读,
2012年7月5日 14:55:392012/7/5
收件人
I'm not advocating force. See my response to the original post,
repeated here for your benefit:

> 8. Do you believe people living in a free country ought to be
> compelled to recite a pledge of allegiance to that country? Why?

Bert Hyman

未读,
2012年7月5日 15:02:502012/7/5
收件人
How much choice does a first grader have when his teacher tells the
entire class to stand, face the flag and recite the pledge?

What, exactly, do you think the whole affair means to a 6-year-old
anyway?

--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN be...@iphouse.com

Peter Franks

未读,
2012年7月5日 15:53:052012/7/5
收件人
Period.

Bert

未读,
2012年7月5日 19:05:532012/7/5
收件人
But they're not.

> Any patriot would willingly take advantage of the opportunity.

I see... You're seriously expecting a 6-year-old to take a stand in his
first grade classroom because he's a patriot.

> Period.

Stupid.

BeamMeUpScotty

未读,
2012年7月5日 21:32:562012/7/5
收件人




>> 8. Do you believe people living in a free country ought to be
>> compelled to recite a pledge of allegiance to that country? Why?


What's important is that we can NOW tax the Liberals for NOT
participating in the Pledge of Allegiance. All we need to do is get it
passed with a vote of 51% Republicans like all tax laws.

This could be educational for Liberal-Progressives and maybe even a
certain Progressive-Republican Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts.




--
*BeamMeUpScotty's Rule*

#7 - Make the Socialists proud of you, strive to be the best at
mediocrity that you can be.

Bert

未读,
2012年7月6日 13:03:482012/7/6
收件人
In news:4FF64048...@blackhole.nebulax.com BeamMeUpScotty
<ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:

> What's important is that we can NOW tax the Liberals for NOT
> participating in the Pledge of Allegiance.

Oh goodie! Another wannabe authoritarian thug steps forward to be
recognized.

BeamMeUpScotty

未读,
2012年7月6日 13:52:382012/7/6
收件人
On 7/6/2012 1:03 PM, Bert wrote:
> In news:4FF64048...@blackhole.nebulax.com BeamMeUpScotty
> <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>
>> What's important is that we can NOW tax the Liberals for NOT
>> participating in the Pledge of Allegiance.
>
> Oh goodie! Another wannabe authoritarian thug steps forward to be
> recognized.



The point was to enlighten the Socialists to what all that power in the
other guys hands can be like.... you gave that poor to Obama and Libs
and now you REAP THE WINDS OF YOUR CHANGE.

*THE POINT IS THAT YOU SUCKERS WERE THE FOOLS THAT GAVE UP OUR FREEDOM*


*NOW YOU GET TO PERSONALLY FEEL THAT PAIN FOR YOURSELVES*



--
*BeamMeUpScotty's Rule*

#33 - Give my children liberty or we have agreed to do battle.

BeamMeUpScotty

未读,
2012年7月6日 14:33:262012/7/6
收件人
On 7/6/2012 1:03 PM, Bert wrote:
> In news:4FF64048...@blackhole.nebulax.com BeamMeUpScotty
> <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>
>> What's important is that we can NOW tax the Liberals for NOT
>> participating in the Pledge of Allegiance.
>
> Oh goodie! Another wannabe authoritarian thug steps forward to be
> recognized.



The point was to enlighten the Socialists to what all that power in the
other guys hands can be like.... you gave that power to Obama and Libs
and now you REAP THE WINDS OF YOUR CHANGE.

*YOU SUCKERS WERE THE FOOLS THAT ALREADY GAVE UP OUR FREEDOM*


*NOW YOU GET TO PERSONALLY FEEL THAT PAIN FOR YOURSELVES*


We would NOT be the authoritarian, we would be using the power YOU
SOCIALIST ASSHOLES GAVE US. IT'S YOUR AUTHORITARIAN IDEOLOGY THAT MAKES
IT ALL POSSIBLE.



--
*BeamMeUpScotty's Rule*

#21 - You can't make chicken salad with chicken shit.

BeamMeUpScotty

未读,
2012年7月6日 16:29:252012/7/6
收件人
On 7/6/2012 1:03 PM, Bert wrote:
> In news:4FF64048...@blackhole.nebulax.com BeamMeUpScotty
> <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>
>> What's important is that we can NOW tax the Liberals for NOT
>> participating in the Pledge of Allegiance.
>
> Oh goodie! Another wannabe authoritarian thug steps forward to be
> recognized.



The point was to enlighten the Socialists to what all that power in the
other guys hands can be like.... you gave that power to Obama and Libs
and now you REAP THE WINDS OF YOUR CHANGE.

*YOU SUCKERS WERE THE FOOLS THAT ALREADY GAVE UP OUR FREEDOM*


*NOW YOU GET TO PERSONALLY FEEL THAT PAIN FOR YOURSELVES*

What's funny is that you assume we (Republicans) will always do the
right thing with that power so by giving yourselves this power to
force/coerce people, you think *only you will use it* , but I'm here to
tell you that you will rue the day that you gave the GOVERNMENT such
powers and it's sad you had to violate the constitution to do it.
History won't be kind to you Liberal-Socialists.



We would NOT be the authoritarian, we would be using the power YOU
SOCIALIST ASSHOLES GAVE US. IT'S YOUR AUTHORITARIAN IDEOLOGY THAT MAKES
IT ALL POSSIBLE.



--
*BeamMeUpScotty's Rule*

#25 - I'd rather be FREE and poor, than to have my life micromanaged by
Socialists.
已删除帖子

BeamMeUpScotty

未读,
2012年7月7日 13:49:572012/7/7
收件人
On 7/7/2012 1:41 PM, Dennis M wrote:
> In article <4FF74AA5...@blackhole.nebulax.com>,
> BeamMeUpScotty <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>
>> The point was to enlighten the Socialists to what all that power in the
>> other guys hands can be like.... you gave that power to Obama and Libs
>> and now you REAP THE WINDS OF YOUR CHANGE.
>
> Us soshulists sure know what it's like when your beloved fascist right
> gains all that power -- 1930s Germany.
>
> We'll never survive another round with Republicans running the entire
> show like we had earlier in this decade.


Then you should have been limiting *GOVERNMENT* so the Republicans can't
do even worse to you, instead you give the government more power.

That tells us that you're either idiots... or you're LIARS and you
already know "that you will be the ones to abuse that power" and NOT the
Republicans.


*BeamMeUpScotty's Rule*

#45 - If you haven't found the lie in what a Liberal told you, then you
didn't dig deep enough.



已删除帖子

BeamMeUpScotty

未读,
2012年7月7日 14:32:292012/7/7
收件人
On 7/7/2012 2:01 PM, Dennis M wrote:
> In article <4FF876C5...@blackhole.nebulax.com>,
> BeamMeUpScotty <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>
>> On 7/7/2012 1:41 PM, Dennis M wrote:
>>> In article <4FF74AA5...@blackhole.nebulax.com>,
>>> BeamMeUpScotty <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The point was to enlighten the Socialists to what all that power in the
>>>> other guys hands can be like.... you gave that power to Obama and Libs
>>>> and now you REAP THE WINDS OF YOUR CHANGE.
>>>
>>> Us soshulists sure know what it's like when your beloved fascist right
>>> gains all that power -- 1930s Germany.
>>>
>>> We'll never survive another round with Republicans running the entire
>>> show like we had earlier in this decade.
>>
>>
>> Then you should have been limiting *GOVERNMENT* so the Republicans can't
>> do even worse to you, instead you give the government more power.
>>
>> That tells us that you're either idiots... or you're LIARS and you
>> already know "that you will be the ones to abuse that power" and NOT the
>> Republicans.
>
> It was your party's president who cornholed the 4th amendment under the
> guise of fighting terr'ism so don't get on your high horse about giving
> the gubbmint more power.



And I chastised him for it and at least it had a sunset clause, but your
Liberals and Socialist-Democrats passed the same Patriot act laws with
more powers and did it with *NO SUNSET CLAUSE* .

Thanks to your kind it will never go away... the GOVERNMENT is in a
perpetual state of National-Socialist war against we the people of the
United States.



--
*BeamMeUpScotty's Rule*

#32 - Nothing scares a Socialist more than free people exercising their
freedoms.

Eddie Haskell

未读,
2012年7月7日 14:35:082012/7/7
收件人

"Dennis M" <denn...@dennism3.invalid> wrote in message
news:dennism3-402624...@bonxibon.datemas.de...
> In article <4FF74AA5...@blackhole.nebulax.com>,
> BeamMeUpScotty <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>
>> The point was to enlighten the Socialists to what all that power in the
>> other guys hands can be like.... you gave that power to Obama and Libs
>> and now you REAP THE WINDS OF YOUR CHANGE.
>
> Us soshulists sure know what it's like when your beloved fascist right
> gains all that power -- 1930s Germany.
>
> We'll never survive another round with Republicans running the entire
> show like we had earlier in this decade.
>
> People know that and that's why Obama will be reelected with
> Teapublicans continuing to go chronically insane.

Remarkable how everything you just said is the exact opposite of reality.

-Eddie Haskell


Eddie Haskell

未读,
2012年7月7日 14:39:512012/7/7
收件人

"Dennis M" <denn...@dennism3.invalid> wrote in message
news:dennism3-03BA38...@bonxibon.datemas.de...
> In article <4FF876C5...@blackhole.nebulax.com>,
> BeamMeUpScotty <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>
>> On 7/7/2012 1:41 PM, Dennis M wrote:
>> > In article <4FF74AA5...@blackhole.nebulax.com>,
>> > BeamMeUpScotty <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> The point was to enlighten the Socialists to what all that power in
>> >> the
>> >> other guys hands can be like.... you gave that power to Obama and
>> >> Libs
>> >> and now you REAP THE WINDS OF YOUR CHANGE.
>> >
>> > Us soshulists sure know what it's like when your beloved fascist right
>> > gains all that power -- 1930s Germany.
>> >
>> > We'll never survive another round with Republicans running the entire
>> > show like we had earlier in this decade.
>>
>>
>> Then you should have been limiting *GOVERNMENT* so the Republicans can't
>> do even worse to you, instead you give the government more power.
>>
>> That tells us that you're either idiots... or you're LIARS and you
>> already know "that you will be the ones to abuse that power" and NOT the
>> Republicans.
>
> It was your party's president who cornholed the 4th amendment under the
> guise of fighting terr'ism so don't get on your high horse about giving
> the gubbmint more power.

Bush spent political capital taking those measures to fight terrorism, while
Hussein issued his unconstitutional emigration edicts for no more than his
reelection bid. Get the difference? No, I thought not. It has to do with
morals and the good of the nation, so as a democrat you wouldn't understand.

-Eddie Haskell


BeamMeUpScotty

未读,
2012年7月7日 14:47:142012/7/7
收件人
On 7/7/2012 2:01 PM, Dennis M wrote:
> In article <4FF876C5...@blackhole.nebulax.com>,
> BeamMeUpScotty <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>
>> On 7/7/2012 1:41 PM, Dennis M wrote:
>>> In article <4FF74AA5...@blackhole.nebulax.com>,
>>> BeamMeUpScotty <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The point was to enlighten the Socialists to what all that power in the
>>>> other guys hands can be like.... you gave that power to Obama and Libs
>>>> and now you REAP THE WINDS OF YOUR CHANGE.
>>>
>>> Us soshulists sure know what it's like when your beloved fascist right
>>> gains all that power -- 1930s Germany.
>>>
>>> We'll never survive another round with Republicans running the entire
>>> show like we had earlier in this decade.
>>
>>
>> Then you should have been limiting *GOVERNMENT* so the Republicans can't
>> do even worse to you, instead you give the government more power.
>>
>> That tells us that you're either idiots... or you're LIARS and you
>> already know "that you will be the ones to abuse that power" and NOT the
>> Republicans.
>
> It was your party's president who cornholed the 4th amendment under the
> guise of fighting terr'ism so don't get on your high horse about giving
> the gubbmint more power.

And yours that made it law forever.


已删除帖子
已删除帖子

BeamMeUpScotty

未读,
2012年7月7日 16:07:142012/7/7
收件人
On 7/7/2012 3:49 PM, Dennis M wrote:
> In article <4FF880BD...@blackhole.nebulax.com>,
> Pfft. Dumbya cynically knew his so-called Patriot Act would eventually
> become permanent even with a sunset clause, just like his two tax cuts
> for the super-rich.
>

Like Obama and Pelosi cynically knew that ObamaCare was a TAX and that
they were raising taxes on the MIDDLE CLASS while they lied to the
NATION telling us they were NOT raising taxes on anyone?


Lets talk LIARS...

BeamMeUpScotty

未读,
2012年7月7日 16:26:262012/7/7
收件人
On 7/7/2012 2:01 PM, Dennis M wrote:
> In article <4FF876C5...@blackhole.nebulax.com>,
> BeamMeUpScotty <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>
>> On 7/7/2012 1:41 PM, Dennis M wrote:
>>> In article <4FF74AA5...@blackhole.nebulax.com>,
>>> BeamMeUpScotty <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The point was to enlighten the Socialists to what all that power in the
>>>> other guys hands can be like.... you gave that power to Obama and Libs
>>>> and now you REAP THE WINDS OF YOUR CHANGE.
>>>
>>> Us soshulists sure know what it's like when your beloved fascist right
>>> gains all that power -- 1930s Germany.
>>>
>>> We'll never survive another round with Republicans running the entire
>>> show like we had earlier in this decade.
>>
>>
>> Then you should have been limiting *GOVERNMENT* so the Republicans can't
>> do even worse to you, instead you give the government more power.
>>
>> That tells us that you're either idiots... or you're LIARS and you
>> already know "that you will be the ones to abuse that power" and NOT the
>> Republicans.
>
> It was your party's president who cornholed the 4th amendment under the
> guise of fighting terr'ism so don't get on your high horse about giving
> the gubbmint more power.

BUSH'S PATRIOT ACT already died... it did what it was supposed to do and
it SUNSET and died as a law, THERE IS NO BUSH PATRIOT ACT ANYMORE...

THE NEW LAW THAT DEMOCRATS PASSED AFTER THE PATRIOT ACT DIED, has all
teh same stuff and more and no sunset clause in it.

That's the OBAMA "PERMANENT" PATRIOT ACT. Hope you love it.

And I chastised Bush for his and at least it had a sunset clause, but
your Liberals and Socialist-Democrats passed the same Patriot act laws
with more powers and did it with *NO SUNSET CLAUSE* .

Thanks to your kind it will never go away...


--
*BeamMeUpScotty's Rule*

#4 - When it comes to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, there
is NO moderation.

Eddie Haskell

未读,
2012年7月7日 17:17:542012/7/7
收件人

"Dennis M" <denn...@dennism3.invalid> wrote in message
news:dennism3-B1088F...@bonxibon.datemas.de...
> In article <vj%Jr.10188$hc1...@unlimited.newshosting.com>,
> Remarkable how you can post a dozen words and say absolutely nothing.

Remarkable how you can't refute the fact that everything you just said is
the opposite of reality and can only project and say nothing.

-Eddie Haskell


Eddie Haskell

未读,
2012年7月7日 17:43:132012/7/7
收件人

"Dennis M" <denn...@dennism3.invalid> wrote in message
news:dennism3-DC3542...@bonxibon.datemas.de...
> In article <4FF880BD...@blackhole.nebulax.com>,
> Pfft. Dumbya cynically knew his so-called Patriot Act would eventually
> become permanent even with a sunset clause, just like his two tax cuts
> for the super-rich.

JFK cut taxes for the rich and was a bastard for it, right?

The top marginal rate was lower during Clinton than even Reagan so he was a
son-of-bitch, right?

Hint: Greed and envy is a democrat political ploy, not sound economic
policy.

Now, stop making a fool of yourself. It's getting hard to watch.

-Eddie Haskell



Bert

未读,
2012年7月8日 14:25:282012/7/8
收件人
In news:dennism3-03BA38...@bonxibon.datemas.de Dennis M
<denn...@dennism3.invalid> wrote:

> It was your party's

From this can I take it that you're a loyal Democrat?

> president who cornholed the 4th amendment under the guise of fighting
> terr'ism

And your party's president had not only continued those same actions,
but actually increased them.

Bert

未读,
2012年7月8日 14:26:322012/7/8
收件人
In news:dennism3-B1088F...@bonxibon.datemas.de Dennis M
<denn...@dennism3.invalid> wrote:

> In article <vj%Jr.10188$hc1...@unlimited.newshosting.com>,
> "Eddie Haskell" <th...@qiweu.com> wrote:
>>
>> Remarkable how everything you just said is the exact opposite of
>> reality.
>
> Remarkable how you can post a dozen words and say absolutely nothing.

Are you two engaged in some sort of competition, or is this perhaps a form
of flirting?
已删除帖子

BeamMeUpScotty

未读,
2012年7月8日 19:50:232012/7/8
收件人
On 7/8/2012 6:33 PM, Dennis M wrote:
> In article <XnsA08A88BDD11...@88.198.244.100>,
> Hell no bubba but you seem to have a hard-on for Haskell the way you're
> taking up for him.
>
> Or maybe you *are* Haskell, one of his umpteen self-congratulating
> pseudonyms.



Which begs the question of why Liberals would discriminate against
people with multiple personalities? If there's more than one person in
their head (and with Liberals there often is) why NOT let all the
personalities register to vote?





--
*BeamMeUpScotty's Essential Law*

#14 - If more Government, solves all the problems, prison must be a
Socialists Utopia.... and a Club Med vacation for Liberals.

tony944

未读,
2015年10月27日 14:20:472015/10/27
收件人
In a first California agrees to pay
for Transgender inmate’s
Sex change operation’s
This Government Officials should be and must be committed to Mental
Institution. The state is short on the founds to do something about Water
shortage, but there are paying for a “CRIMINALS” to have sex change while
incrassated. Am I only one so stupid in this world, and are we going this
type practice to continue. What does our Constitution saying about it, What
does our Legislators doing about this, what does our Supreme Court doing
about this, what kind fagots are running this country lately. ( I never use
this word but in this situation it is proper) . If you go to Hospital
without insurance, your house is forfeited for bills to be paid . But this
Criminals in prison get medical paid to have Sex Change! By my own
Government that Taxes everything excluding your bathroom waste, sorry you
are paying for that too in sewage fees. It is coming to the point that I am
really shame to say that I am American!!!!!!

Wed. Sep. 30, 2015
You wish to verify this contact reporter at:
Los Angeles Times
Paige ST. John

cpt banjo

未读,
2015年10月27日 15:16:502015/10/27
收件人
On Wednesday, July 4, 2012 at 9:10:50 AM UTC-5, Neal Boortz wrote:

> 28. How did the political class manage to fool the people of the United
> States into supporting a Constitutional Amendment creating an income
> tax?

They didn't. Income taxes were authorized by the original Constitution (Article I, Section 8, Clause 1) because the requisition system under the Articles of Confederation didn't work.

The 16th Amendment was ratified in order to overcome a Supreme Court decision that had held that a tax on investment income had to be apportioned. The case applied only to income such as interest, dividends, and rent. It did not apply to wages, which the Court said could be taxed without apportionment. But Boortz is too dumb to know this bit of history.

PaxPerPoten

未读,
2015年10月28日 03:09:452015/10/28
收件人
originally taxation was only authorized to the states and the Feds had
to request financial support from the states. Just another situation
where in the Federal Camel finally got its nose into the tent and now is
fully in the tent. Income tax was authorized by the states as a
temporary tax to support WWI...It never went away..Thanks to the Federal
reserve corruption of 1913.. When WWII cam they upgraded it to an
with-holding tax. In all reality..This income tax is unconstitutional
and no amount of bullshit can make that untrue.
However the corruption of this countries leaders requires that money to
keep operating. Just like Congress can not relegate its powers..But it
gave war powers to the President. We have no way to outright punish
federal politicians for their crimes. They will not prosecute obne of
their own. They will spend $millions on investigations that go
absolutely nowhere..on purpose. The French had such a system once and
rose up and beheaded every aristocrat they could find.

--
It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard
the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all
ages who mean to govern well, but *They mean to govern*. They promise to
be good masters, *but they mean to be masters*. Daniel Webster

cpt banjo

未读,
2015年10月28日 11:02:202015/10/28
收件人
On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 2:09:45 AM UTC-5, PaxPerPoten wrote:

> Income tax was authorized by the states as a
> temporary tax to support WWI...It never went away..Thanks to the Federal
> reserve corruption of 1913..

Wrong. The tax was introduced in 1861 to help finance the Civil War, and it went away in 1872. It was reintroduced in 1913.

> When WWII cam they upgraded it to an
> with-holding tax.

The 1913 tax had a withholding feature for a couple of years.

> In all reality..This income tax is unconstitutional
> and no amount of bullshit can make that untrue.

The only bullshit is your utter ignorance of the law and the Constitution. The tax is perfectly constitutional.

tony944

未读,
2015年11月3日 17:59:562015/11/3
收件人


"Neal Boortz" wrote in message
news:b2801f24f-0d19-4b4...@WSB.com...

1. Forget when the Declaration of Independence was signed; instead,
explain why it was signed. What were the signers trying to accomplish?

2. What happened to the men who signed the Declaration? Did they go
on to be heroes and live happily ever after?

3. What does the Declaration of Independence say the people can do
when a government becomes destructive to the ends of liberty?
************************************************************
https://twitter.com/tony258

https://draft.blogger.com/home

https://www.facebook.com/t.seput

https://plus.google.com/u/0/112544482920923532160/posts

WELCOME to NEW JERSEY

State of New Jersey Treasury Department

Because some corporation refused to pay user/sales tax, either claiming that
they are tax exempt, or they issue invalid resale's certificate, or they
simply deducted tax from my invoices, these organization has refuse to pay
user/sale's Tax. These organizations had committed fraud a felony and yet
the New Jersey Treasury Dept. did absolutely nothing about it. On top of
that, they have rewarded them by collecting assessed tax by penalizing me
and making me pay for it. Now just think for a moment about this, The State
of New Jersey is protecting fraud organizations from “justice", well yes you
see they happen to be above constitution! In addition, court system in this
country smells, no no “Sorry” it stinks including Supreme Court.
Thank you! What rights do you or I have as citizen of this country that is
in question isn't? Law-abiding citizen get penalized for the organizations
that committed fraud. Very interesting isn't. After I made several complains
to the Legislature I been contacted by gentlemen as acting chief
investigator that he is investigating the situation. Well that kind put me
on ease maybe this person will do something about this problem, I figure to
give men some time so I waited about month or so and I push letter to him
requesting info. What is going on, another month or so pass by I finally got
answer, I will try to make small version of what he got to say. It says
because I did not complained to Audit doing time she done her thing sorry we
can do nothing for you. That is very interesting since first time I here
from hear is from judge that unless payment is made in cash or bank check to
treasury Dept. of New Jersey with in 72 hours warrant will be issue for my
arrest.
The Route that was taking by them; have put State of New Jersey and the
Country centuries back. I do, not blame anyone specifically, however I do
blame entire Legislative system, and all that works for Treasury Dept. The
current and they predecessors in my opinion they are all filthy CROOKS, they
should be shame to be called Legislator's. Personal involved in this
particular case from Treasury Department are as fallow:
Attn: New Jersey Treasury Department I am no longer asking for money that
was taking from me. I am demanding money back with one additional digit
added to it where $26,000.00 is now 260,000.00, yes I know that I am passing
lots of gas for which they don’t give heck.
Note: The Company is out of business; However in my opinion you incompetent
crooks, will continue to be remind that you owe me money unless State decide
it is time to do something about it, otherwise you will be label as crooks
as you are!!!

This people were one involved with this collection but not at one time. In
addition, I was advised that collectors/audit is not state employee but
Contractors more they collect bigger bonuses they get. Good luck to anyone
that might be cut in mess with this people. Mafia Corp.
Mr. Bradley E. Below ("An" New Jersey State Treasurer )
Ms. Cheryl Fulmer ("An" Acting Assistant Director Compliance Service)
Mr. Lawrence F. Gauges ("An" Chief Field Audit Branch)
Ms. Carol O'Cleireacain (An" Special Procedures Branch)
Mr. Mark Hartmann ("An" Acting Chief Investigator)
Ms. Christine Stupak ("An" Garnishment Processing)
Ms. Cheryl Flumer ("An" Acting Assistant Director)
Ms. Wilma Shackin ("An" Judgments section-B)
Ms. Jenny Portero ("An" The Audit)
Ms. Carol O’Cleireacain (“An” Judge Division of Taxation)
Ms. Nokeima Holloway (“An” Division of Taxation Audit-A)
People like these should not be ever employed or contracted where must deal
with General public, they are lacking in Ethics and responsibility to their
Jobs>

It has being almost 10 years which I will not forgive them for their dirty
deeds, we are prosecuting Nazis from dirty deeds 70 years ago, well I will
keep reminding this Bastards of Treasury department in New Jersey for as
long I am alive?. THANK YOU!

(x owner) A. Seput
Cascade Environment Co Inc.
ante...@att.net
************************************************************


4. What would happen to anyone who tried today to alter or abolish
our government if it became destructive to idea that government derives
its powers from the consent of the governed?

5. Which articles of the Constitution grant specific powers to the
federal government?

6. What article of the Constitution restricts the powers of the
government to only those specifically set forth in the Constitution?

7. Describe the circumstances under which Francis Scott Key wrote
the words to the Star Spangled Banner?

8. Do you believe people living in a free country ought to be
compelled to recite a pledge of allegiance to that country? Why?

9. Was the Revolutionary War for independence from Great Britain
supported by a majority of the Colonists?

10. Where in our Constitution is it stated that anyone has a right to
vote for the office of President of the United States?

11. How did our original Constitution provide for the appointment of
Senators?

12. Most foreign countries appoint an ambassador to be their official
representative before the government of the United States. Who
officially represents the 50 state governments before the government of
the United States?

13. Explain the difference between a rule of law and the rule of man.

14. Explain the difference between a democracy and a constitutional
republic.

15. Was our country founded to be a country of majority rule?

16. Write a paragraph describing what life our country would be like
today if the majority did rule?

17. Aren't you glad the majority doesn't rule?



Do you believe that we need additional restrictions on who can vote? If
so, list the restrictions you would recommend.

18. Why does it matter in the grand scheme of things who the governor of
North Carolina is, unless you live in North Carolina?

19. Isn't a governor something you put on a state to keep it from moving
ahead very fast?

20. What possible benefit could you gain by memorizing the motto of the
State of North Carolina, or any other state for that matter?

21. How many times can the word "democracy" found in the Declaration of
Independence and the U.S. Constitution?

22. How many times can the word "democracy" found in the constitutions
of any of the 50 states?

23. What does this tell you?

24. Define "civil war."

25. Was the war between the northern and southern states in the
mid-1800s a civil war?

26. Who is third in the line of succession to the presidency?

27. Based on your answer to the foregoing question, how secure would you
demand additional Secret Service protection for the president and the
vice-president in the event the Democrats gain control of the House of
Representatives in the next election?

28. How did the political class manage to fool the people of the United
States into supporting a Constitutional Amendment creating an income
tax?

29. How do most people get their news on a daily bass?

30. Does the "freedom of press" clause in the First Amendment apply to
the broadcast media?

31. So, do most people get their news from agencies licensed to operate
by the federal government?

32. Why were the words "under God" placed into the Pledge of Allegiance?

33. Do you think that it is proper for the federal government to compel
students attending government schools under compulsory attendance laws
to acknowledge the role of God in the formation of our country? Would
this constitute "effecting an establishment of religion?" If not, why
not?

34. Do Americans derive their basic rights from the Constitution?

35. If we don't derive our rights from the Constitution, just why was
the Bill of Rights added anyway?

36. Define a system of government where the means of production are
owned and controlled privately.

37. Define a system of government where the means of production are
privately owned but controlled by government.

38. Define a system of government where the means of production are
owned and controlled by the government.

39. What percentage of total income is earned by the top one percent of
income earners.

40. What percentage of total income taxes collected by the federal
government is paid by the top one percent of income earners.

41. Where in our Constitution does it specifically state that only U.S.
citizens may vote for the office of President of the United States?

42. Name one function that a state government can exercise without
interference from the federal level.

43. Where in our Constitution does it specifically state that only U.S.
citizens may vote for members of the House of Representatives?

44. Look at the Bill of Rights. List any Amendments in the Bill of
Rights that were ratified for the purpose of limiting the powers of
government.

45. If our Constitution provides for equal protection under the law,
why, then, does the Voting Rights Act only apply to certain states who
were held in political disfavor in the 70's?

46. List any Amendments in the Bill of Rights that were ratified for the
purpose of limiting the rights of individuals.

47. If the Bill of Rights was written to limit the rights of government
and to guarantee certain rights in the individual, try to explain why so
many people seem to think that the 2nd Amendment was written to limit
the rights of individuals and guarantee the rights of government?

48. Does the First Amendment protect speech that some people might find
offensive?

49. Explain how our Republic was threatened when Janet Jackson showed
the world that she likes to wear a Japanese throwing star on the nipple
of her left breast. Or was it her right breast. Does it make any
difference?

50. What is the one exclusive power our government has that no
individual or business can legally exercise?

51. Now this list could be expanded to fill an entire book. I could,
for instance, add a hundred or so questions beginning with "Where does
the United States Constitution give the federal government the right to
.........." Fifty questions is enough, though, and it's time to finish
the Nuze and head to the studios.

It does occur to me that some of you high school and college government
teachers and instructors might have a bit of fun with these questions
and your students. No ... I'm not providing the answers.

0 个新帖子