Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Not One Mississippi Judge Sought To Recuse From Gay Marriage
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Beam Me Up Scotty
Jul 7, 2016, 1:39:05 PM7/7/16
to
On 07/07/2016 12:02 PM, Tom Sr. wrote:
> On Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 10:54:03 AM UTC-4, David Hartung wrote:
>> yes, the clue is that the judge is an Obama appointee and thus unfit to
>> be a judge.
>
>
>
> WOW. Talking about *stereotyping*!
>
>
> So the *Republican* Director of the FBI is also unfit to serve because he was appointed by Obama?
>
That's been the over all outcome, anyone Obama appoints seems to be
incompetent so you have to do what Liberals do with Global Warming, look
at the consensus. Most of them leave or get run out under a cloud of
incompetence and ignorance.
We've seen Kathleen Sebelius "incompetent" and Eric Holder's
Congressional contempt charge, Loretta Lynch meeting Bill Clinton in a
clandestine airplane meeting.... then there was the admitted Communist
Van Jones, and the woman that was quoting Mao. There's Hillary the
e-mail Queen. Now we have the FBI Director.
Comey finds that Hillary had no intent to break the law, but a typical
parent that has a gun... *apparently has intent* when they accidentally
leave that gun where their kid gets it and shoots him self. I think
there's at least one person in prison right now that owned a gun that a
child managed to get a hold of and shoot someone with it. The Attorney
general prosecuted the parent for that. But Hillary leaving National
secrets around that can get people killed is ignored?
You see the problem here is that Obama is the thread that ties all the
incompetence together and some of it's NOT incompetence and may NOT be
coming from these people but actually from Obama who requires them to
fall on their sword when the truth is exposed, so they claim
incompetence like Kathleen Sebelius did to protect the Obama connection.
Like Comey when he claims there was no "intent" when Hillary broke the
law, thus hiding/protecting Loretta Lynch's and Hillary's "incompetence"
which was actually deception NOT incompetence on Hillary's part and
everyone says Loretta Lynch knew better so we have to assume her "error"
also had intent and it wasn't incompetence and that thread is connected
by Obama as well.
Comey falling on his sword to save Hillary and Loretta Lynch is once
again connected by Obama and his support for Hillary and Lynch and Comey
has to trade his good name for being part of that Obama conspiracy. It's
been the same thing over and over.
> But Comey was perfectly fit to serve as the United States Deputy Attorney General when he was appointed by Republican Bush?
>
Obviously he was lacking back then and shouldn't have been given any
higher position. But Obama has been carefully looking for people to
appoint to office that are lacking so that he can use them like
Petraeus, Obama managed to dump Petraeus and unload a lot of baggage
with that one as well.
I've said all along that anyone and I mean *ANYONE* stupid enough to be
in the same room or work for Obama or the Clinton's in *ANY* capacity,
will get what they deserve for making such a stupid decision, because
somewhere down the line, the Obama/Clinton types will throw you under
the bus to keep themselves out of trouble.
--
That's Karma ;)
Obama has no problem calling the police, racists and condemning them.
Why so much difficulty calling Muslims, terrorists and condemning them?
> On Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 10:54:03 AM UTC-4, David Hartung wrote:
>> yes, the clue is that the judge is an Obama appointee and thus unfit to
>> be a judge.
>
>
>
> WOW. Talking about *stereotyping*!
>
>
> So the *Republican* Director of the FBI is also unfit to serve because he was appointed by Obama?
>
That's been the over all outcome, anyone Obama appoints seems to be
incompetent so you have to do what Liberals do with Global Warming, look
at the consensus. Most of them leave or get run out under a cloud of
incompetence and ignorance.
We've seen Kathleen Sebelius "incompetent" and Eric Holder's
Congressional contempt charge, Loretta Lynch meeting Bill Clinton in a
clandestine airplane meeting.... then there was the admitted Communist
Van Jones, and the woman that was quoting Mao. There's Hillary the
e-mail Queen. Now we have the FBI Director.
Comey finds that Hillary had no intent to break the law, but a typical
parent that has a gun... *apparently has intent* when they accidentally
leave that gun where their kid gets it and shoots him self. I think
there's at least one person in prison right now that owned a gun that a
child managed to get a hold of and shoot someone with it. The Attorney
general prosecuted the parent for that. But Hillary leaving National
secrets around that can get people killed is ignored?
You see the problem here is that Obama is the thread that ties all the
incompetence together and some of it's NOT incompetence and may NOT be
coming from these people but actually from Obama who requires them to
fall on their sword when the truth is exposed, so they claim
incompetence like Kathleen Sebelius did to protect the Obama connection.
Like Comey when he claims there was no "intent" when Hillary broke the
law, thus hiding/protecting Loretta Lynch's and Hillary's "incompetence"
which was actually deception NOT incompetence on Hillary's part and
everyone says Loretta Lynch knew better so we have to assume her "error"
also had intent and it wasn't incompetence and that thread is connected
by Obama as well.
Comey falling on his sword to save Hillary and Loretta Lynch is once
again connected by Obama and his support for Hillary and Lynch and Comey
has to trade his good name for being part of that Obama conspiracy. It's
been the same thing over and over.
> But Comey was perfectly fit to serve as the United States Deputy Attorney General when he was appointed by Republican Bush?
>
Obviously he was lacking back then and shouldn't have been given any
higher position. But Obama has been carefully looking for people to
appoint to office that are lacking so that he can use them like
Petraeus, Obama managed to dump Petraeus and unload a lot of baggage
with that one as well.
I've said all along that anyone and I mean *ANYONE* stupid enough to be
in the same room or work for Obama or the Clinton's in *ANY* capacity,
will get what they deserve for making such a stupid decision, because
somewhere down the line, the Obama/Clinton types will throw you under
the bus to keep themselves out of trouble.
--
That's Karma ;)
Obama has no problem calling the police, racists and condemning them.
Why so much difficulty calling Muslims, terrorists and condemning them?
Beam Me Up Scotty
Jul 8, 2016, 5:01:25 PM7/8/16
to
On 07/08/2016 07:18 AM, Tom Sr. wrote:
> On Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 8:48:01 PM UTC-4, David Hartung wrote:
>> On 07/07/2016 03:22 PM, Tom Sr. wrote:
>>> The rational folks here are well aware of the fact.
>> --
>>
>> Just who are these rational people?
>
>
>
> You would not understand, Pastor David Hartung, because you are not rational.
Rational people follow science and reality..... how do you explain Gays?
What are gays?
What can the science prove.
Reality isn't what you believe because you may believe in the delusional
things your mind produces.
What are the facts that can be proven by science about gays?
Since you believe in gays and have no rational science that proves they
exist.... are you attributing gay to be your religion or to being your
delusion?
--
That's Karma ;)
Obama has no problem labeling Republicans as his enemy, he can label
police as racist...
Obama has no problem calling the police, racists and condemning them.
Why does Obama have so much difficulty calling Muslims, terrorists and
condemning them?
> On Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 8:48:01 PM UTC-4, David Hartung wrote:
>> On 07/07/2016 03:22 PM, Tom Sr. wrote:
>>> The rational folks here are well aware of the fact.
>> --
>>
>> Just who are these rational people?
>
>
>
> You would not understand, Pastor David Hartung, because you are not rational.
Rational people follow science and reality..... how do you explain Gays?
What are gays?
What can the science prove.
Reality isn't what you believe because you may believe in the delusional
things your mind produces.
What are the facts that can be proven by science about gays?
Since you believe in gays and have no rational science that proves they
exist.... are you attributing gay to be your religion or to being your
delusion?
--
That's Karma ;)
police as racist...
Obama has no problem calling the police, racists and condemning them.
condemning them?
Clave
Jul 8, 2016, 5:46:51 PM7/8/16
to
"Beam Me Up Scotty"
<Liberalism-is-exposed-as-unsustainab...@cyberspace.nebulax.com>
wrote in message news:DwUfz.4121$Kj....@fx08.iad...
> On 07/08/2016 07:18 AM, Tom Sr. wrote:
>> On Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 8:48:01 PM UTC-4, David Hartung wrote:
>>> On 07/07/2016 03:22 PM, Tom Sr. wrote:
>>>> The rational folks here are well aware of the fact.
>>> --
>>>
>>> Just who are these rational people?
>>
>>
>>
>> You would not understand, Pastor David Hartung, because you are not
>> rational.
>
> Rational people follow science and reality..... how do you explain Gays?
I think a more relevant problem would be explaining stupidity as deep and
>> On Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 8:48:01 PM UTC-4, David Hartung wrote:
>>> On 07/07/2016 03:22 PM, Tom Sr. wrote:
>>>> The rational folks here are well aware of the fact.
>>> --
>>>
>>> Just who are these rational people?
>>
>>
>>
>> You would not understand, Pastor David Hartung, because you are not
>> rational.
>
> Rational people follow science and reality..... how do you explain Gays?
opaque as yours.
Beam Me Up Scotty
Jul 8, 2016, 10:27:08 PM7/8/16
to
demonize anyone that threatens your delusional world.
Thanks for demonstrating that delusional people are not able to deal
with reality and rational questions.
--
That's Karma ;)
Republicans as racists easily enough...
Clave
Jul 8, 2016, 10:29:54 PM7/8/16
to
wrote in message news:%hZfz.6575$Cw3....@fx05.iad...
stupidity is a genuinely valid point of discussion.
> On 07/08/2016 05:45 PM, Clave wrote:
>>
>> "Beam Me Up Scotty"
>> <Liberalism-is-exposed-as-unsustainab...@cyberspace.nebulax.com>
>> wrote in message news:DwUfz.4121$Kj....@fx08.iad...
>>> On 07/08/2016 07:18 AM, Tom Sr. wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 8:48:01 PM UTC-4, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>> On 07/07/2016 03:22 PM, Tom Sr. wrote:
>>>>>> The rational folks here are well aware of the fact.
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Just who are these rational people?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You would not understand, Pastor David Hartung, because you are not
>>>> rational.
>>>
>>> Rational people follow science and reality..... how do you explain
>>> Gays?
>>
>> I think a more relevant problem would be explaining stupidity as deep
>> and opaque as yours.
>>
>>
>>
> And as any delusional person would do.... you ignored reality and you
> demonize anyone that threatens your delusional world.
You aren't being "demonized" -- an explanation of your rather breathtaking
>>
>> "Beam Me Up Scotty"
>> <Liberalism-is-exposed-as-unsustainab...@cyberspace.nebulax.com>
>> wrote in message news:DwUfz.4121$Kj....@fx08.iad...
>>> On 07/08/2016 07:18 AM, Tom Sr. wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 8:48:01 PM UTC-4, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>> On 07/07/2016 03:22 PM, Tom Sr. wrote:
>>>>>> The rational folks here are well aware of the fact.
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Just who are these rational people?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You would not understand, Pastor David Hartung, because you are not
>>>> rational.
>>>
>>> Rational people follow science and reality..... how do you explain
>>> Gays?
>>
>> I think a more relevant problem would be explaining stupidity as deep
>> and opaque as yours.
>>
>>
>>
> And as any delusional person would do.... you ignored reality and you
> demonize anyone that threatens your delusional world.
stupidity is a genuinely valid point of discussion.
0 new messages