Jenn wrote:
> G. Morgan wrote:
>> Jenn wrote:
>>>>> My xp has 2gb ram and a 2.00ghz processor. What do you
>>>>> think?
>>>
>>>> You can install Android 4.4 on the HDD or a bootable "live" USB
>>>> stick. Since you're already familiar with Android, and probably
>>>> have some paid apps you want to use it may be a good choice.
>>>
>>> So, Android is a linux system?
>>
>> Yes, its based on a Linux core.
>
> k It may be a couple weeks before I can get another flash drive to
> try this... but, it'll be fun to try eventually.
>
IMO, the android issue is sorta' wandering off into the weeds; so I
guess we need to make an excursion in that direction.
On the one hand, android the OS was designed for a specific hardware
purpose, small economical mobile (touchscreen) devices and google
acquired the developer company almost 10 years ago, but all of the
development since has been guided by Google and the Open Handset
Alliance which has revolved entirely or almost entirely around ARM
processors.
Jenn's XP is neither mobile nor ARM; and the principle linux
development, while it includes massively parallel super computers as
well as ARM processors and other embedded devices, for the purposes of
this discussion should be considered to 'mostly' be about x86 and x86-64
(her XP and her Win7 hardware).
The lineage of android and Mac as it relates to the lineage of linux is
not where Jenn's 'education' should be drifting here. She is coming
from 'mainstream' Windows (her XP and her Win7) and mainstream hardware
ie her x86 XP and her x86-64 Win7 ware and 'incidentally' she is
familiar with small mobile touchscreen devices such as those which are
android.
The business about 'crossovers' by which I am able to boot up an
android-like linux OS called android-x86 on my x86 and x86-64 hardware
is what I'm calling wandering off into the weeds, which is what the link
is about. I can also boot a chromeOS-like linux called chromixium,
which I have done.
android has an old relationship with the linux kernel, but it isn't the
same kernel as 'my' linux distros use. Playstation has a relationship
with the linux/BSD kernel, which also isn't. OS X has distant
relationships with old kernels that 'my' distros do also, but that
kernel isn't the same either.
It seems to me that this kernel (and CPU) heritage information is going
to be more confusing than enlightening if the starting position of the
student Jenn is as someone who isn't usually familiar with what hardware
her computers are running. I think we should direct our guidance in a
manner which is most straightforward in the direction one would
anticipate her to travel, nor 'pointing at' the flowery weeds on the
side roads.
It would be useful for her to get a flash drive or even two; I wouldn't
be doing my shopping at Walgreen's or CVS (unless they had some dynamite
promotional for some reason) because their prices for such items are
typically triple what a good deal somewhere else like WalMart or more
electronically oriented stores might be.
Then, it would be useful for her to 'briefly' consider some basics about
the main families of linux, such as the rpm vs deb families and then the
main desktop environment families which are more numerous (several) than
just two.
If she were going to go in the popular deb package Ubuntu lineage Mint
direction, a good choice for the XP hardware would be the Mint XFCE,
while the Win7 hardware might be the Mint Cinnamon. The XP hardware
needs a 32 bit distro, the Win7 hardware could use 32 or 64 bit.
There are sites which combine multiple linux distros into a single .iso,
such as
linuxaio.net. One can download about a 4G .iso with 3 32 or 64
bit Mints in the XFCE, Cinnamon, and MATE varieties.
If Jenn is going to dabble in linux, it seems worthwhile to stay on the
main road, which is going to be sufficiently confusing and daunting
without going off on the 'unique' spurs such as android-like android-x86
or chromeOS-like chromixium, both of which I've seen on live USB.
Her hardware is suited to XP and Win7, not a small mobile touchscreen
device. So, her linux distro choices should be 'mainstream' linux for
x86 and x86-64, not ARM processor or touchscreen oriented.
--
Mike Easter