Right-Wing Troll Notification System Test

[GOP_Decline_and_Fall]

https://soundcloud.com/mike-in-raleigh/right-wing-troll-notification
--
"It has always struck me as odd, even perverse, that former Marxists
have been permitted, yes invited, to play such a leading role in the
Conservative movement of the twentieth century.

It is splendid when the town whore gets religion and joins the church.
Now and then she makes a good choir director, but when she begins to
tell the minister what he ought to say in his Sunday sermons, matters
have been carried too far."

Stephen Tonsor

[Domitius Corbulo]

Conservatives have no ideas; just irritable mental
gestures, which seek to resemble ideas.
-Lionel Trilling

[opel]

On 5/19/2013 7:20 AM, Kirby Grant wrote:

> Conservatives are easy to identify. Everything they do is based on the
> perpetuation of evil. They simply have no concept being decent, moral
> people. Luckily they are a small, albeit noisy, minority that really doesn't
> count much.
>

"Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> a écrit dans le message de groupe de
discussion : 4fe6...@news.synserver.de...
> My life-partner, Brad, and I agree. This is, without a doubt, THE best
> song
> of 2012!
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qn5nEV8q-4U
>
> God favors President Obama because he isn't a stupid bible-thumper
> evangelical religous nut job. God hates all conservatives anyhow since
> conservatism is in direct opposition to the divine plan since it gets in
> the
> way of progress. God has always favored liberals. Conservatives only
favor
> themselves and hate god.

[Bucky]

The last great idea a liberal had was a bumper sticker. Liberals tend to
be effeminate and not well educated. That is why the Obama
administration is a worse failure than any in our history.

[Mr. Truth]

On 05/19/2013 06:20 AM, Kirby Grant wrote:
> On 17-May-2013, Domitius Corbulo<cor...@gmx.com> wrote:
>

> Conservatives are easy to identify. Everything they do is based on the
> perpetuation of evil. They simply have no concept being decent, moral
> people. Luckily they are a small, albeit noisy, minority that really doesn't
> count much.

The minority that earns the money for your welfare. Who was in charge of
Benghazi? Fast and Furious? IRS? Seizing AP records? The most
dishonorable men in our history, the Democrats of the Obama
adminstration. No morals, no decency, criminals.

[Ramon F. Herrera]

Today's Republicans, Conservatives, and Tea-baggers are

". . .the jackals, the cowards, the traitors, the failures, the
yapping feist pack that tries to drive out truth; those who dislike
Jews, Negroes, Mexicans, Catholics and liberals; the bitter and evil
persons who organize themselves and send out hate literature; the Klan
types, the States’ Rights diehards, those who dynamite churches,
synagogues and homes -- they are the abscesses in America’s society. "

-- Ralph McGill, Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 1968

[Eddie Haskell]

"Kirby Grant" <kgr...@whatzit.org> wrote in message
news:rApnt.31661$M%4.1...@fe03.iad...

> What law was broken at Benghazi? None that I know of.

Obama lied and let Americans die and didn't give a fuck, you groveling toady
shit.

> What law was broken by the IRS in probing conservative groups? None that I
> know of.

It's illegal as hell and Obama was behind it and should swing for it. The
fucker is nothing but a third world fascist.

> And beyond that, the probing of conservative groups is totally
> appropriate since conservative groups are involved in illegal activities

Go fuck yourself, you goddamn brownshirt. You're not a US citizen, you're a
worthless fascist toady brownshirt. Fuck you and everybody that looks like
you. Obama ass fucked a goat. Now start defending it, you pile of slop. Get
the fuck out of my country, you goddamned brownshirted fascist cocksucker.

[Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E]

On May 23, 9:46 am, "Eddie Haskell" <yn...@sawq.com> wrote:
> "Kirby Grant" <kgr...@whatzit.org> wrote in message
>
> news:rApnt.31661$M%4.1...@fe03.iad...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 19-May-2013, "Mr. Truth" <she...@thefreedombus.mx> wrote:
>
> >> On 05/19/2013 06:20 AM, Kirby Grant wrote:

> the fuck out of my country, you goddamned brownshirted fascist cocksucker.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Damn Eddie !! Tell the boy how you really feel !!

(snort)

[opel]

On 5/23/2013 10:22 AM, Kirby Grant wrote:

> On 23-May-2013, wrote:
>
>> On May 23, 9:46 am, "Eddie Haskell" <yn...@sawq.com> wrote:
>>> "Kirby Grant" <kgr...@whatzit.org> wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:rApnt.31661$M%4.1...@fe03.iad...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 19-May-2013, "Mr. Truth" <she...@thefreedombus.mx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> On 05/19/2013 06:20 AM, Kirby Grant wrote:
>>>>>> On 17-May-2013, Domitius Corbulo<corb...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>

> Luckily for me, I have that foul-mouthed little child filtered.


"Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> a �crit dans le message de groupe de

[opel]

On 5/23/2013 8:20 AM, Kirby Grant wrote:
> History has always shown that conservatives are despicable, immoral,

"Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> a écrit dans le message de groupe de

[Patty O'Furnachur]

> Luckily for me, I have that foul-mouthed little child filtered. It is
> actually comical that he would try to make out that I'm not a U.S. citizen
> when he is an adolescent Canadian living in public housing in Toronto. For
> some strange reason he thinks he has the right to comment on U.S. politics.

He simply has you pegged as a parasite on America.
Ironically, he is more of an American supporter than you are. But you
are probably a homosexual because no woman would have anything to do
with a cowardly, despicable and dishonorable man like you. Why do you
think that Michelle vacations alone? David Axelrod hasn't had a piece of
ass since Barney Frank retired. Who is Reggie Love's bitch? Ha ha. Three
guesses and they are all in the White House.

[Patty O'Furnachur]

On 05/23/2013 07:20 AM, Kirby Grant wrote:
> On 19-May-2013, "Mr. Truth"<she...@thefreedombus.mx> wrote:
>

> What law was broken at Benghazi? None that I know of.

Americans were killed due to the incompetence of the Obama
administration. They don't think it was important. Evidently, you enjoy
some benefit from the dishonorable administration that allows you to set
aside loyalty to your country, and acceptance of lame excuses that blame
people unrelated to the incident.
You are dishonorable, and despicable as is your leader.

>
> What law was broken by the IRS in probing conservative groups? None that I

> know of. And beyond that, the probing of conservative groups is totally

> appropriate since conservative groups are involved in illegal activities

> constantly - that is part of the very nature of being a conservative. So
> since conservatives are outlaws the government should be monitoring
> conservative actions very closely at all times.

Of course you don't know. Anytime the President uses the government for
personal and political gai, it is high crimes and misdemeanors. Remember
President Nixon? You are are obviously a paid apologist for the DNC, or
worse a government employee without honor, and very ambitious about
kissing ass.
>
> The seizing of AP records was totally legal. The AP was involved in doing
> things that jeopardized national security in the form of illegal access to
> classified information.

Wrong Skippy, it is not illegal to ask for any information, ie; FOIA, or
asking a government employee. It is illegal for a government employee to
give classified information to people lacking authorization. Like the
info Obama and Holder share with their supporters about IRS information
and personal information with the intent to do harm. Impeachable offenses.

>
> History has always shown that conservatives are despicable, immoral,

> unethical and involved in illegal activity. For this good of this country,
> conservativism should be banned entirely.

Of course it should. That way we could go beyond the Planet of the Apes
which the USA is now.

[tingler]

On 5/24/2013 10:29 AM, Kirby Grant wrote:
> Planet of the Apes was a fictional futuristic motion picture. With a stress
> on fictional.

[tingler]

On 5/24/2013 10:35 AM, Kirby Grant wrote:
> My most recent girlfriend was a woman who was less than half my age. We
> didn't date because I am some great stud or male model of any type. She
> allowed me to date her because I treated her decently and

Did she know you're a poof?

[God's Debris]

O is certainly not the worst, at least he's no worse then the
president he seems to be modeling himself after, Bush II.

[Domitius Corbulo]

On 5/23/2013 10:20 AM, Kirby Grant wrote:
> On 19-May-2013, "Mr. Truth" <she...@thefreedombus.mx> wrote:
>
> What law was broken at Benghazi? None that I know of.
>

Conservatives will cease any possible opportunity to denigrate our
government. There was no enough time to protect the compound at
Benghazi and they know this. They ignore facts for their own brand of
fiction.

> What law was broken by the IRS in probing conservative groups? None that I
> know of. And beyond that, the probing of conservative groups is totally
> appropriate since conservative groups are involved in illegal activities
> constantly - that is part of the very nature of being a conservative. So
> since conservatives are outlaws the government should be monitoring
> conservative actions very closely at all times.
>

If they have nothing to worry about, why would they be concerned. More
of the above, obviously.

> The seizing of AP records was totally legal. The AP was involved in doing
> things that jeopardized national security in the form of illegal access to
> classified information.
>

Exactly. See the last sentence.

> History has always shown that conservatives are despicable, immoral,
> unethical and involved in illegal activity. For this good of this country,
> conservativism should be banned entirely.
>

Very true. They have been this way for over 100 years. See:

Not all conservatives are stupid people
but most stupid people are conservative.
John Stuart Mill (1879)

[tingler]

On 5/25/2013 9:47 AM, Kirby Grant wrote:
> I think that Mill was trying to be polite since he was an English gentleman.

"Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> a �crit dans le message de groupe de

[tingler]

On 5/24/2013 5:25 PM, God's Debris wrote:

>> The last great idea a liberal had was a bumper sticker. Liberals tend to
>> be effeminate and not well educated. That is why the Obama
>> administration is a worse failure than any in our history.
>
> O is certainly not the worst,

Yes he is, worse even that Carter - by a country mile or more.

> at least he's no worse then the
> president he seems to be modeling himself after, Bush II.
>

Bush 2 would never have publicly announced a retreat from fighting
terrorists.

[tingler]

On 5/25/2013 6:29 AM, Domitius Corbulo wrote:
> There was no enough time to protect the compound at Benghazi and they
> know this.

That's a lie, there were drones in the air available for targeting and
gunships just hours away.

[Domitius Corbulo]

A drone might be just fine if you were intent on killing everyone in and
around the compound. And hours away? It seems they didn't have that
long to react. They needed boots on the ground for this one. If they
could have saved those people they would have. And just who handed that
information to you?

[Harold Burton]

In article <kn6p6q$igm$2...@dont-email.me>,

Domitius Corbulo <cor...@gmx.com> wrote:

> On 5/17/2013 2:03 AM, GOP_Decline_and_Fall wrote:
> >
> > https://soundcloud.com/mike-in-raleigh/right-wing-troll-notification
> > --
> > "It has always struck me as odd, even perverse, that former Marxists
> > have been permitted, yes invited, to play such a leading role in the
> > Conservative movement of the twentieth century.
> >
> > It is splendid when the town whore gets religion and joins the church.
> > Now and then she makes a good choir director, but when she begins to
> > tell the minister what he ought to say in his Sunday sermons, matters
> > have been carried too far."
> >
> > Stephen Tonsor
> >

> Conservatives have no ideas; just irritable mental
> gestures, which seek to resemble ideas.
> -Lionel Trilling

Stupid statements during ones youth tend to become embarrassing as one
ages.


snicker

"Some, both conservative and liberal, argue that Trilling's views became
steadily more conservative over time, and Trilling has been embraced as
sympathetic to neoconservativism by neoconservatives (such as Norman
Podhoretz, editor of Commentary), though this embrace was unrequited,
Trilling criticizing the New Left (as he had the Old Left), but not
embracing neoconservativism. The extent to which Trilling may be
identified with neoconservativism continues to be contentious, forming a
point of debate in (Rodden 2000)."

[Harold Burton]

In article <jk4mt.72908$R74....@fed03.iad>,
"Kirby Grant" <kgr...@whatzit.org> wrote:

> On 17-May-2013, Domitius Corbulo <cor...@gmx.com> wrote:
>
> > On 5/17/2013 2:03 AM, GOP_Decline_and_Fall wrote:
> > >
> > > https://soundcloud.com/mike-in-raleigh/right-wing-troll-notification
> > > --
> > > "It has always struck me as odd, even perverse, that former Marxists
> > > have been permitted, yes invited, to play such a leading role in the
> > > Conservative movement of the twentieth century.
> > >
> > > It is splendid when the town whore gets religion and joins the church.
> > > Now and then she makes a good choir director, but when she begins to
> > > tell the minister what he ought to say in his Sunday sermons, matters
> > > have been carried too far."
> > >
> > > Stephen Tonsor
> > >
> > Conservatives have no ideas; just irritable mental
> > gestures, which seek to resemble ideas.
> > -Lionel Trilling
>

> Conservatives are easy to identify. Everything they do is based on the
> perpetuation of evil. They simply have no concept being decent, moral
> people.

when constantly confronted with Democrats, that's understandable.



snicker

[Harold Burton]

In article <5199262c$1...@news.synserver.de>,

Plus most Massachusetts politicians.

>No morals, no decency, criminals.

Indeed!


snickier

[Harold Burton]

In article <rApnt.31661$M%4.1...@fe03.iad>,
"Kirby Grant" <kgr...@whatzit.org> wrote:

> > adminstration. No morals, no decency, criminals.

>
>
> What law was broken at Benghazi? None that I know of.

Who claimed a law was broken?


Do try to stay on topic.


Leftards, batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.

[Harold Burton]

In article <knrjs4$iu9$1...@dont-email.me>,

Domitius Corbulo <cor...@gmx.com> wrote:

> On 5/25/2013 1:25 PM, tingler wrote:
> > On 5/25/2013 6:29 AM, Domitius Corbulo wrote:
> >> There was no enough time to protect the compound at Benghazi and they
> >> know this.
> >
> > That's a lie, there were drones in the air available for targeting and
> > gunships just hours away.
> >
> A drone might be just fine if you were intent on killing everyone in and
> around the compound.

Not in, just around.

[Harold Burton]

In article <8ndot.55169$lu5....@fe19.iad>,
"Kirby Grant" <kgr...@whatzit.org> wrote:

> I suspect that he may have had privileged access to information about active
> drone missions and is therefore commiting a felony by revealing this
> information.


So report him

[tingler]

On 5/25/2013 4:34 PM, Kirby Grant wrote:

> See? There you go, flapping your gums without just cause.
>
> There are only one of two things that are at play here.
>
> 1. You are a stupid ignorant liar. Which makes sense since you are a
> conservative. The real truth is that you do not have any direct knowledge of
> drones being available just then for targeting because you are just some
> coward, dishonorable cretin.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/international/us_watched_as_terror_raged_AypAEEA9OK23rPf7Z5BHWO

By TIM PERONE
From With POST WIRE SERVICES
Last Updated: 6:30 AM, October 21, 2012
Posted: 12:37 AM, October 21, 2012
The United States had an unmanned Predator drone over its consulate in
Benghazi during the attack that slaughtered four Americans � which
should have led to a quicker military response, it was revealed yesterday.

�They stood, and they watched, and our people died,� former CIA
commander Gary Berntsen told CBS News.

The network reported that the drone and other reconnaissance aircraft
observed the final hours of the hours-long siege on Sept. 11 � obtaining
information that should have spurred swift action.

> 2. You actually did have direct knowledge of the exact positions of the
> drones and therefore you are violating non-disclosure agreements which are
> legally binding on you. In effect, you are providing classified information
> in an unauthorized channel.

Uh...right, that's certainly a unique angle, lol!

> So which one are you? An ignorant liar? Or a felon who is subject to being
> sent to jail for unauthorized disclosure of information you were given on a
> privileged basis. One one of those things things can be true.


"One one"?

Let's try, "none", LOL!

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/05/07/purported-benghazi-drone-operator-calls-sean-hannity-with-new-details-cant-be-armed-that-night-and-no-one-has-contacted-me/

A man identifying himself as one of the drone operators on point during
the September 11 Benghazi attack called Sean Hannity�s radio show
yesterday, alleging more information about the scene on the ground and
the Obama administration�s handling of the attack.

According to the man, named only as �John in Iowa,� neither the
administration nor Congress has even attempted to speak to him about
what he saw during the attack.

He told Hannity: �The video footage � when we initially got on station
and we were told to go down to the consulate � it was already under
attack. It was already on fire [when we got there]. We were asked then
to go to the annex to just try to watch and make sure that the
individuals in the annex were not going to be coming under attack there
either��

He continued: �If anything were to happen, this video is being
disseminated to multiple locations and agencies around the globe. So
surely once individuals saw that there was a grave problem on a U.S.
Embassy/Consulate, phone calls I would�ve think should�ve been made and
started going up the chain, and eventually it would�ve hit the State
Department. If it did not, individuals were remiss in their duties.�

John reiterated that they were working for an agency that already knew
there was a problem in Benghazi; that�s why they were sent there.

He continued:

�There were dozens if not hundreds of people surrounding the consulate.
There were cars continually driving by and stopping, and it was at
that time � we were only over the consulate for maybe about five minutes
when we were told to then go watch the CIA annex.

Our guys that were inside of there were on the rooftops, and they were
looking in the direction of the consulate, and we were told, just watch
the entries and the exits of the consulate and make sure no one�s trying
to break in and get them there. But we wouldn�t have been able to do
much anyway because of the [agreement] with the host countries where
we�re located. We were not able to be armed that night.� [Emphasis added]


�I�m just a little surprised that you�re telling me all this and that
nobody in Congress has contacted you,� Hannity said. �I would think
that you�d be one of the main people they�d want to talk to.�

�Ya I would think so too,� the operator replied. �There would be only
about six of us from the base out of which we operate at that would�ve
been involved on that specific mission that night, and so it should be
really easy to track us down. Then again, if they just did not
care�especially with Sec. of State Clinton�s comment of �what difference
does it make,� and trying to potentially cover things up, then they
probably didn�t even worry about who was on the flight log for that night.�

John said he knew �immediately� that the American people were being lied
to, particularly �with regard to Susan Rice� that the attack was
actually an outgrowth of a YouTube-related �spontaneous� protest.

�But we are bound by certain documents such as non-disclosure agreements
on what we can and can�t say, and my thought was that I am a small pawn
in this chess game, and the truth will come out, and then it just
unfolds and unfolds�and it never stops.�

[tingler]

On 5/25/2013 6:13 PM, Domitius Corbulo wrote:
> On 5/25/2013 1:25 PM, tingler wrote:
>> On 5/25/2013 6:29 AM, Domitius Corbulo wrote:
>>> There was no enough time to protect the compound at Benghazi and they
>>> know this.
>>
>> That's a lie, there were drones in the air available for targeting and
>> gunships just hours away.
> >
> A drone might be just fine if you were intent on killing everyone in and
> around the compound.

Ever hear of surgical targeting?

> And hours away?

Hours, yes.

> It seems they didn't have that
> long to react.

That's a lie - read the timeline:

http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2013/05/damning-benghazi-timeline-spreadsheet.html

> They needed boots on the ground for this one.

No.

> If they could have saved those people they would have.

Apparently sleep won out.

> And just who handed that information to you?

[tingler]

On 5/25/2013 7:15 PM, Kirby Grant wrote:

> I suspect that he may have had privileged access to information about active
> drone missions and is therefore commiting a felony by revealing this
> information.

You play usenet poker like a little girl, twinky.

> Or he could just be a run of the bill Republican liar - there
> are so many of them that it is hard to keep track.

[tingler]

On 5/26/2013 11:29 AM, Kirby Grant wrote:

> Already taken care of.
>

Uh oh, they'll be coming for me, Beck, and the friggin' NY Post...

Yikes %-(

Meanwhile:

[Domitius Corbulo]

I wasn't there or have any insider information regarding the movement of
our defense forces. Perhaps you do but I don't believe it. The two links
you offer do serve two purposes, First to Denigrate the President
and Second to denigrate any future aspirations of those who are in
office from running in 2016.

Surgical strikes are great if they are indeed surgical and 100%
accurate. Again I can't say much since I wasn't looking down the sights
of weapons that might be able to have prevented deaths in Benghazi and
again, perhaps you are. For certain it is easy enough to sit here after
the fact and offer opinions, charts that may or may not be true. Whoever
made up that timeline put a lot of effort into it which bring out the
real question: "Why did the administration want those people killed?"
Why did they want to place suspecion onto them and the administration?
I would be interested in your answers to those questions. I offer an
opinion and never said I was ever in a position to judge what went wrong
as you seem to do on a regular basis. You conveniently substitute
opinions for lies.
Domitius

[tingler]

Wow, no kidding?

I'm sure plenty of folks in uselessnet-land were sure that YOU were the
new "deep throat"...

Laugh, laugh, laugh...

> Perhaps you do but I don't believe it.

You're a Dem shill - what you decide to "believe" is instantaneously
dismissed!

> The two links
> you offer do serve two purposes, First to Denigrate the President
> and Second to denigrate any future aspirations of those who are in
> office from running in 2016.

LOL!

You mean Billary is now very much NOT in play for 2016?!?!?

Oh crap!

Deal.

> Surgical strikes are great if they are indeed surgical and 100%
> accurate.

NOTHING is 100% in a military response, so fuck off with that strawman
argument.

> Again I can't say much since I wasn't looking down the sights
> of weapons that might be able to have prevented deaths in Benghazi and
> again, perhaps you are.

Or perhaps I'm simply offering credible EYEWITNESS testimony such as:

> For certain it is easy enough to sit here after
> the fact and offer opinions, charts that may or may not be true.

Which "charts" are those?

Do you mean the ACTUAL timeline?

http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2013/05/damning-benghazi-timeline-spreadsheet.html


Yeah, those FACTS just reside uncomfortably midway in your fetid craw,
don't they?

> Whoever
> made up that timeline put a lot of effort into it which bring out the
> real question: "Why did the administration want those people killed?"

Or...why was the administration so fucking CLUEKESS that it LET them be
killed?

Do you have a problem with the fact that Stevens was ritually SODOMIZED
in the same way was Ghadaffi was before HE was killed?

You know how ass-hungry those Muzzies are, right?

http://swordattheready.wordpress.com/2012/09/13/u-s-ambassador-reportedly-raped-sodomized-before-being-killed/

The Washington Times picked up a story from Lebanon�s Tayyar news
organization from an AFP source that states that murdered Ambassador
Christopher Stevens, was raped by his captors before being killed. The
Libyan Free Press also televised the story:
UPDATE: Hmmmm � how convenient for Youtube to yank the Libyan TV video
from their site. Wonder if Youtube got a call from the Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff like American pastor Terry Jones did, and was
�asked� to take down potentially offensive (and truthful) material?

Obama�s State Department earlier on Wednesday apologized to Muslims that
they were offended by �irresponsible� Americans exercising their right
to free speech, as the �cause� of the attacks is reported to have been
due outrage over a Youtube video that insults the Prophet Mohammed.
That spin does not hold water when it is being learned that these
attacks were planned well in advance and the video being used as cover
to suggest the attacks were spontaneous. Also learned was that the same
Libyan Security forces that Obama praised so highly in his short
address, gave up consulate personnel including Stephens, to the
Islamists who ended up murdering them.

All of this happened nearly at the same time Obama was giving an address
to salute the Arab Forum on 9-11 Tuesday.

> Why did they want to place suspecion onto them and the administration?

A "suspecion"[sic]?

Huh?

Possibly because this teflon presidency is the most CORRUPT in our
nation's history!

> I would be interested in your answers to those questions.

No you wouldn't.

You're here to act as a shill for Obama and to deny and decouple from
reality as it is noted.

> I offer an
> opinion and never said I was ever in a position to judge what went wrong
> as you seem to do on a regular basis.

Hey dipshit we're ALL in a position to "judge what went wrong" due to
adequate if minimal MSM reportage available on the matter.

Cope.

> You conveniently substitute
> opinions for lies.
> Domitius

No, you fascist bastard, I do NOT!

I present credible and proven facts:

http://dailycaller.com/2013/01/23/clinton-on-benghazi-story-confusion-what-difference-does-it-make-video/

WASHINGTON � Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Wednesday that the
misinformation that came out about the Benghazi attacks in their
immediate aftermath no longer mattered...

On Wednesday, Johnson accused her of �purposefully misleading the
American people� by blaming nonexistent protests.

�With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. If it was
because of a protest or if it was because guys out for a walk decided to
go kill some Americans. What difference at this point does it make?�
Clinton shot back in a raised voice.


http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2013/05/08/video-the-youtube-video-was-a-nonevent-in-libya-n1591158

"The YouTube video was a non-event in Libya." This simple statement of
fact explicitly and forcefully contradicts the White House's dishonest
"online video" spin, which was repeated ad nauseam by numerous
high-ranking administration officials and certain members of the media.
The president's hand-picked spokesperson on the matter -- UN
Ambassador Susan Rice -- told the American people on the Sunday after
the attack that the raid was the "direct result of a heinous and
offensive video." The Weekly Standard's Stephen Hayes obtained the
original and revised talking points last week; the documents leave
little doubtthat the White House and State Department wanted to
white-wash the clear terrorism angle. Hicks told the committee that he
found Rice's comments on national television "stunning" and
"embarrassing." When he sent his objections up the food chain at State,
he was subjected to a "blistering attack" and was "effectively demoted."
Hicks also testified today that he personally informed Sec. Clinton by
phone that the US diplomatic mission in Benghazi was under terrorist
attack in the opening minutes of the incident. Days later, she stood
next to the flag-draped coffins of the fallen and blamed the raid on an
"awful internet video."


http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/02/world/africa/us-libya-benghazi-suspects

(CNN) -- Several Yemeni men belonging to al Qaeda took part in the
terrorist attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi last
September, according to several sources who have spoken with CNN.

One senior U.S. law enforcement official told CNN that "three or four
members of al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula," or AQAP, took part in the
attack.


http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/initial-benghazi-talking-points-changed-12-times-mentions-of-terror-removed/

ABC News has obtained 12 different versions of the talking points that
show they were extensively edited as they evolved from the drafts first
written entirely by the CIA to the final version distributed to Congress
and to U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice before she appeared on
five talk shows the Sunday after that attack.

White House emails reviewed by ABC News suggest the edits were made with
extensive input from the State Department. The edits included requests
from the State Department that references to the Al Qaeda-affiliated
group Ansar al-Sharia be deleted as well references to CIA warnings
about terrorist threats in Benghazi in the months preceding the attack.

[Domitius Corbulo]

On 5/27/2013 1:04 PM, tingler wrote:
>
> Wow, no kidding?
>
> I'm sure plenty of folks in uselessnet-land were sure that YOU were the
> new "deep throat"...
>
> Laugh, laugh, laugh...
>

> You're a Dem shill - what you decide to "believe" is instantaneously
> dismissed!
>

> LOL!
>
> You mean Billary is now very much NOT in play for 2016?!?!?
>
> Oh crap!
>
> Deal.
>

> NOTHING is 100% in a military response, so fuck off with that strawman
> argument.
>

> Or perhaps I'm simply offering credible EYEWITNESS testimony such as:
>
> http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/05/07/purported-benghazi-drone-operator-calls-sean-hannity-with-new-details-cant-be-armed-that-night-and-no-one-has-contacted-me/
>
>
> A man identifying himself as one of the drone operators on point during

> the September 11 Benghazi attack called Sean Hannity’s radio show

> yesterday, alleging more information about the scene on the ground and

> the Obama administration’s handling of the attack.
>
You mean a man saying he was one of the drone operators. Neither you or
Hannity know anything for certain.
>
> Which "charts" are those?
>
In the link you posted here.

>
> Do you mean the ACTUAL timeline?
>
> http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2013/05/damning-benghazi-timeline-spreadsheet.html
>
>
> Yeah, those FACTS just reside uncomfortably midway in your fetid craw,
> don't they?
>

Even if they were true, there in absolutely nothing I can do about it
and neither can you except to excite yourself while getting others excited.

>
> Or...why was the administration so fucking CLUEKESS that it LET them be
> killed?
>

Take your own advice and answer my question without modifying it to fit
your agenda.

>
> Do you have a problem with the fact that Stevens was ritually SODOMIZED
> in the same way was Ghadaffi was before HE was killed?
>

Inane question

> You know how ass-hungry those Muzzies are, right?
>

More of the same.

>
> Possibly because this teflon presidency is the most CORRUPT in our
> nation's history!
>
>> I would be interested in your answers to those questions.
>
> No you wouldn't.
>

True enough. You won't answer them.

>
> You're here to act as a shill for Obama and to deny and decouple from
> reality as it is noted.
>

> Hey dipshit we're ALL in a position to "judge what went wrong" due to
> adequate if minimal MSM reportage available on the matter.
>
> Cope.
>

>No, you fascist bastard, I do NOT!
>
> I present credible and proven facts:
>

You present opinions: as you are incapable of rational thought. You
parrot the opinions of others.
Bye, "Tingler" is it this time?
>

[Domitius Corbulo]

On 5/27/2013 1:04 PM, tingler wrote:
>

> Wow, no kidding?
>
> I'm sure plenty of folks in uselessnet-land were sure that YOU were the
> new "deep throat"...
>
> Laugh, laugh, laugh...
>

> You're a Dem shill - what you decide to "believe" is instantaneously
> dismissed!
>

> LOL!
>
> You mean Billary is now very much NOT in play for 2016?!?!?
>
> Oh crap!
>
> Deal.
>

> NOTHING is 100% in a military response, so fuck off with that strawman
> argument.
>

> Or perhaps I'm simply offering credible EYEWITNESS testimony such as:
>
> http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/05/07/purported-benghazi-drone-operator-calls-sean-hannity-with-new-details-cant-be-armed-that-night-and-no-one-has-contacted-me/
>
>
> A man identifying himself as one of the drone operators on point during

> the September 11 Benghazi attack called Sean Hannity’s radio show

> yesterday, alleging more information about the scene on the ground and

> the Obama administration’s handling of the attack.
>
You mean a man saying he was one of the drone operators. Neither you or
Hannity know anything for certain.
>
> Which "charts" are those?
>
In the link you posted here.
>

> Do you mean the ACTUAL timeline?
>
> http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2013/05/damning-benghazi-timeline-spreadsheet.html
>
>
> Yeah, those FACTS just reside uncomfortably midway in your fetid craw,
> don't they?
>

Even if they were true, there in absolutely nothing I can do about it
and neither can you except to excite yourself while getting others excited.
>

> Or...why was the administration so fucking CLUEKESS that it LET them be
> killed?
>

Take your own advice and answer my question without modifying it to fit
your agenda.
>

> Do you have a problem with the fact that Stevens was ritually SODOMIZED
> in the same way was Ghadaffi was before HE was killed?
>

Inane question

> You know how ass-hungry those Muzzies are, right?
>

More of the same.

>
> Possibly because this teflon presidency is the most CORRUPT in our
> nation's history!
>
>> I would be interested in your answers to those questions.
>
> No you wouldn't.
>

True enough. You won't answer them.
>

> You're here to act as a shill for Obama and to deny and decouple from
> reality as it is noted.
>

> Hey dipshit we're ALL in a position to "judge what went wrong" due to
> adequate if minimal MSM reportage available on the matter.
>
> Cope.
>

>No, you fascist bastard, I do NOT!
>
> I present credible and proven facts:
>

[tingler]

On 5/27/2013 7:01 PM, Domitius Corbulo wrote:
> On 5/27/2013 1:04 PM, tingler wrote:
>>
>> Wow, no kidding?
>>
>> I'm sure plenty of folks in uselessnet-land were sure that YOU were the
>> new "deep throat"...
>>
>> Laugh, laugh, laugh...
>>
>> You're a Dem shill - what you decide to "believe" is instantaneously
>> dismissed!
>>
>> LOL!
>>
>> You mean Billary is now very much NOT in play for 2016?!?!?
>>
>> Oh crap!
>>
>> Deal.
>>
>> NOTHING is 100% in a military response, so fuck off with that strawman
>> argument.
>>
>> Or perhaps I'm simply offering credible EYEWITNESS testimony such as:
>>
>> http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/05/07/purported-benghazi-drone-operator-calls-sean-hannity-with-new-details-cant-be-armed-that-night-and-no-one-has-contacted-me/
>>
>>
>>
>> A man identifying himself as one of the drone operators on point during

>> the September 11 Benghazi attack called Sean Hannity�s radio show

>> yesterday, alleging more information about the scene on the ground and

>> the Obama administration�s handling of the attack.

>>
> You mean a man saying he was one of the drone operators. Neither you or
> Hannity know anything for certain.

It's credible reportage, deal with it, dipshit.

>>
>> Which "charts" are those?
>>
> In the link you posted here.

Ah, you mean the established and unquestioned timeline, yes.

>>
>> Do you mean the ACTUAL timeline?
>>
>> http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2013/05/damning-benghazi-timeline-spreadsheet.html
>>
>>
>>
>> Yeah, those FACTS just reside uncomfortably midway in your fetid craw,
>> don't they?
>>
> Even if they were true,

"if"?

They are multiple scources confirmed.

> there in absolutely nothing I can do about it
> and neither can you except to excite yourself while getting others excited.

OK, that works for me.

The more Americans that get a clue as to what really happened, the better.

Cope.

>>
>> Or...why was the administration so fucking CLUEKESS that it LET them be
>> killed?
>>
> Take your own advice and answer my question without modifying it to fit
> your agenda.

Take a flying fuck at the moon, you traitor.

>>
>> Do you have a problem with the fact that Stevens was ritually SODOMIZED
>> in the same way was Ghadaffi was before HE was killed?
>>
> Inane question

So you do or do not have a problem with his ritual muzzie public
ass-rape prior to his being murdered?

Answer at your leisure.

>> You know how ass-hungry those Muzzies are, right?
>>
> More of the same.

Yeah, they prove that a lot.

>>
>> Possibly because this teflon presidency is the most CORRUPT in our
>> nation's history!
>>
>>> I would be interested in your answers to those questions.
>>
>> No you wouldn't.
>>
> True enough. You won't answer them.

Your disingenuous, leading, partisan questions are instantly dismissed.

> >
>> You're here to act as a shill for Obama and to deny and decouple from
>> reality as it is noted.
>>
>> Hey dipshit we're ALL in a position to "judge what went wrong" due to
>> adequate if minimal MSM reportage available on the matter.
>>
>> Cope.
>>
>> No, you fascist bastard, I do NOT!
>>
>> I present credible and proven facts:
>>
> You present opinions: as you are incapable of rational thought. You
> parrot the opinions of others.

You deny realities in the MSM.

I repost them for ALL to see, enjoy:

http://swordattheready.wordpress.com/2012/09/13/u-s-ambassador-reportedly-raped-sodomized-before-being-killed/

The Washington Times picked up a story from Lebanon�s Tayyar news
organization from an AFP source that states that murdered Ambassador
Christopher Stevens, was raped by his captors before being killed. The
Libyan Free Press also televised the story:
UPDATE: Hmmmm � how convenient for Youtube to yank the Libyan TV video
from their site. Wonder if Youtube got a call from the Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff like American pastor Terry Jones did, and was
�asked� to take down potentially offensive (and truthful) material?

Obama�s State Department earlier on Wednesday apologized to Muslims that
they were offended by �irresponsible� Americans exercising their right
to free speech, as the �cause� of the attacks is reported to have been
due outrage over a Youtube video that insults the Prophet Mohammed. That
spin does not hold water when it is being learned that these attacks
were planned well in advance and the video being used as cover to
suggest the attacks were spontaneous. Also learned was that the same
Libyan Security forces that Obama praised so highly in his short
address, gave up consulate personnel including Stephens, to the
Islamists who ended up murdering them.

All of this happened nearly at the same time Obama was giving an address
to salute the Arab Forum on 9-11 Tuesday.

I present credible and proven facts:

> Bye, "Tingler" is it this time?
>>

You want some more...come git you....

[opel]

On 5/27/2013 7:29 PM, Domitius Corbulo wrote:
> You parrot the opinions of others.

You deny actual factual reportage, shill:

http://swordattheready.wordpress.com/2012/09/13/u-s-ambassador-reportedly-raped-sodomized-before-being-killed/

The Washington Times picked up a story from Lebanon�s Tayyar news
organization from an AFP source that states that murdered Ambassador
Christopher Stevens, was raped by his captors before being killed. The
Libyan Free Press also televised the story:
UPDATE: Hmmmm � how convenient for Youtube to yank the Libyan TV video
from their site. Wonder if Youtube got a call from the Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff like American pastor Terry Jones did, and was
�asked� to take down potentially offensive (and truthful) material?

Obama�s State Department earlier on Wednesday apologized to Muslims that
they were offended by �irresponsible� Americans exercising their right
to free speech, as the �cause� of the attacks is reported to have been
due outrage over a Youtube video that insults the Prophet Mohammed. That
spin does not hold water when it is being learned that these attacks
were planned well in advance and the video being used as cover to
suggest the attacks were spontaneous. Also learned was that the same
Libyan Security forces that Obama praised so highly in his short
address, gave up consulate personnel including Stephens, to the
Islamists who ended up murdering them.

All of this happened nearly at the same time Obama was giving an address
to salute the Arab Forum on 9-11 Tuesday.