Is Charles Krauthammer Losing It, Or Is It That He Just Does Not Like Herman Cain, A Threat To The Republican Establsihment?

[Clay North]

Last night on Fox news political specialist Charles Krauthammer attacked
Herman Cain for the latter's alleging that the recent slanderous smear
attack on Cain is probably a conspiracy of liberals, the "Democrat Machine"
and Cain, according to Beltway conservative Krauthammer made a bad mistake
in earlier suggesting that the Perry campaign may be involved.

Wasn't that the keystone of the political philosophy of the late Marxist
idol of Obama, Saul Alinksy--to strive for the personal destruction of one's
adversaries. Krauthammer should here apologize for his dumb naiveté?

But Cain should not be blamed for reacting this way to these obvious
conspiratorial attempts to destroy his campaign for the Republican
nomination and the presidency.
Look where the innuendos and malicious rumors came from, "Politico Magazine"
which is a Democrat rag founded and run by liberals formerly employees of
the Washington Post, Time Magazine and the New York Times, three of the most
Democrat biased, partisan socialist publications in the U.S.

Now it has been revealed that Cain's first accuser is a neighbor of Democrat
David Axelrod in Chicago. Axelrod who ran Obama's 2008 campaign, was his
Chief of Staff at the White House and is now heading Obama's 2012 reelection
campaign. This "troubled" woman also has a very questionable past. And Cain
has not been her first target for the accusation of sexual harassment.

Now a fourth or fifth complainant to come out of the woodwork against Cain
is an employee of the Obama Democrat government. She wants to assemble all
the so-called victims of this lecherous black man in a collective press
conference. This uppity negro Herman Cain, according to "liberals" and the
Democrat party is threatening virtuous white blonds, as pure as the driven
snow. Pure white American women must denounce this old, lewd black man--and
proves that he is evil simply because his dares to be a black conservative.

http://www.politico.com/staff.html


--
The growing incompetence of
government is not subject to cycles.
The public sector will not get better
at performing its new tasks, no matter
how hard people try to reinvent
government. There are certain things
that government is inherently unfit to
do. Nor will the government get better
at doing the things it is fitted to do
unless it divests itself at everything else.
The only way that government is going
to get better at cleaning streets is if
keeping the streets clean is once again
one of its few jobs, and one that it takes
seriously.--Charles Murray, "What It
Means To Be A Libertarian".

[Sexual Harassment Panda]

Clay North wrote:

>
> Last night on Fox news political specialist Charles Krauthammer attacked
> Herman Cain for the latter's alleging that the recent slanderous smear
> attack on Cain is probably a conspiracy of liberals, the "Democrat Machine"
> and Cain, according to Beltway conservative Krauthammer made a bad mistake
> in earlier suggesting that the Perry campaign may be involved.

Hey, what's wrong with Krauthammer's nose?

We Democrats would LOVE to have Cain as your nominee. Romney, Bachmann, Perry,
Paul, Santorum, and lots and lots of women would rather he NOT be the nominee.

>
> Wasn't that the keystone of the political philosophy of the late Marxist
> idol of Obama, Saul Alinksy--to strive for the personal destruction of one's
> adversaries. Krauthammer should here apologize for his dumb naiveté?
>
> But Cain should not be blamed for reacting this way to these obvious
> conspiratorial attempts to destroy his campaign for the Republican
> nomination and the presidency.
> Look where the innuendos and malicious rumors came from, "Politico Magazine"
> which is a Democrat rag founded and run by liberals formerly employees of
> the Washington Post, Time Magazine and the New York Times, three of the most
> Democrat biased, partisan socialist publications in the U.S.
>
> Now it has been revealed that Cain's first accuser is a neighbor of Democrat
> David Axelrod in Chicago. Axelrod who ran Obama's 2008 campaign, was his
> Chief of Staff at the White House and is now heading Obama's 2012 reelection
> campaign. This "troubled" woman also has a very questionable past. And Cain
> has not been her first target for the accusation of sexual harassment.
>
> Now a fourth or fifth complainant to come out of the woodwork against Cain
> is an employee of the Obama Democrat government. She wants to assemble all
> the so-called victims of this lecherous black man in a collective press
> conference. This uppity negro Herman Cain, according to "liberals" and the
> Democrat party is threatening virtuous white blonds, as pure as the driven
> snow. Pure white American women must denounce this old, lewd black man--and
> proves that he is evil simply because his dares to be a black conservative.
>
> http://www.politico.com/staff.html
>
>

--

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQnNH7I07RY
Ezekiel 23:20

[Nick Backlash]

Sexual Harassment Panda wrote

>
> Hey, what's wrong with Krauthammer's nose?
>
> We Democrats would LOVE to have Cain as your nominee. Romney, Bachmann, Perry,
> Paul, Santorum, and lots and lots of women would rather he NOT be the nominee.
>

Krauthammer is clearly an insane left wing racist for how he's broken ranks with
the obedient and spoken out.

On domestic issues, Krauthammer is a supporter of legalized abortion;[28][29]
an opponent of the death penalty; an intelligent design critic and an
advocate for the scientific consensus on evolution, calling the religion-
science controversy a "false conflict;" a supporter of embryonic stem cell
research using embryos discarded by fertility clinics with restrictions in
its applications;and a longtime advocate of radically higher energy taxes to
induce conservation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer#Ideology

[SaPeIsMa]

"Nick Backlash" <backl...@live.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.2924f4446...@news.eternal-september.org...

So you're stupid enough to imagine that ALL conservatives have to agree on
ALL so-called "conservative" issues ?
Now how stupid is that ?

[40%ŽÇonned]

"Nick Backlash" <backl...@live.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.2924f4446...@news.eternal-september.org...

[40%ŽÇonned]

"Nick Backlash" <backl...@live.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.2924f4446...@news.eternal-september.org...
>

[§pamßuster]

"Nick Backlash" <backl...@live.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.2924f4446...@news.eternal-september.org...

[Sid9]

"Clay North" <sull...@live.ca> wrote in message
news:X6mdnVqqZeZoYCfT...@giganews.com...

.
.
Cain would be god's gift to Obama as his Republican opponent.

This attack clearly comes from one of Cain's opponents in the Republican
party.

Attack Cain?
Who benefits?
Not Obama.
Any of Cain's opponents benefits...especially Romney


--- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to ne...@netfront.net ---

[Juris Diction]

In article <UuGdnUywcIs3tibT...@bright.net>,

Right-wing idiot, meet right-wing idiot.

[AmericanMorn]

On Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:25:27 -0500, "Clay North" <sull...@live.ca> wrote:

>
>Last night on Fox news political specialist Charles Krauthammer attacked
>Herman Cain for the latter's alleging that the recent slanderous smear
>attack on Cain is probably a conspiracy of liberals, the "Democrat Machine"
>and Cain, according to Beltway conservative Krauthammer made a bad mistake
>in earlier suggesting that the Perry campaign may be involved.
>
>Wasn't that the keystone of the political philosophy of the late Marxist
>idol of Obama, Saul Alinksy--to strive for the personal destruction of one's
>adversaries. Krauthammer should here apologize for his dumb naiveté?
>

I could wax eloquently about the man I believe Dr. Krauthammer is, his abilities,
contributions and the tribulations he's risen above but these are all covered in the
posting below which I received June 12, 2010. Read it and weep as you realize how
right he's been so far and how wrong you are.....AM


Dr. Krauthammer


Fast Facts

1. Born: March 13, 1950
2. Birthplace: New York City, New York
3. Raised in Montreal, Canada
4. Attended McGill University and Harvard Medical School
5. 1972 diving accident left him a paraplegic
6. Directed psychiatric research for the Carter administration
7. Began writing career in 1981 with The New Republic
8. Helped develop the "Reagan Doctrine" in the 80s
9. Appointed to Presidential Council on Bioethics in 2002


Dr. Krauthammer is on Fox News. He is an M.D. and a lawyer and is paralyzed from the
neck down. A friend went to hear Charles Krauthammer. He listened with 25 others in
a closed room. What he says here, is NOT 2nd-hand but 1st. The ramifications are
staggering for us, our children and their children.

Last Monday was a profound evening, Dr. Charles Krauthammer spoke to the Center for
the American Experiment. He is a brilliant intellectual, seasoned & articulate. He is
forthright and careful in his analysis, and never resorts to emotions or personal
insults. He is NOT a fear monger nor an extremist in his comments and views. He is a
fiscal conservative, and has received a Pulitzer Prize for writing. He is a frequent
contributor to Fox News and writes weekly for the Washington Post.

The entire room was held spellbound during his talk. I have summarized his comments,
as we are living in uncharted waters economically and internationally. Even 2 Dems
at my table agreed with everything he said! If you feel like forwarding this to those
who are open minded and have not drunk the Kool-Aid, feel free...

Summary of his comments:

1. Mr. Obama is a very intellectual, charming individual. He is not to be
underestimated. He is a cool customer who doesn't show his emotions. It's very hard
to know what's behind the mask.The taking down of the Clinton dynasty was an amazing
accomplishment. The Clintons still do not understand what hit them. Obama was in the
perfect place at the perfect time.

2. Obama has political skills comparable to Reagan and Clinton. He has a way of
making you think he's on your side, agreeing with your position, while doing the
opposite. Pay no attention to what he SAYS; rather, watch what he DOES!

3. Obama has a ruthless quest for power. He did not come to Washington to make
something out of himself, but rather to change everything, including dismantling
capitalism. He can't be straightforward on his ambitions, as the public would not go
along. He has a heavy hand, and wants to level the playing field with income
redistribution and punishment to the achievers of society. He would like to model the
USA to Great Britain or Canada.

4. His three main goals are to control ENERGY, PUBLIC EDUCATION, and NATIONAL
HEALTHCARE by the Federal government. He doesn't care about the auto or financial
services industries, but got them as an early bonus. The cap and trade will add costs
to everything and stifle growth. Paying for FREE college education is his goal. Most
scary is his healthcare program, because if you make it FREE and add 46,000,000
people to a Medicare-type single-payer system, the costs will go through the roof.
The only way to control costs is with massive RATIONING of services, like in Canada.
God forbid!

5. He has surrounded himself with mostly far-left academic types. No one around him
has ever even run a candy store. But they are going to try and run the auto,
financial, banking and other industries. This obviously can't work in the long run.
Obama is not a socialist; rather he's a far-left secular progressive bent on nothing
short of revolution. He ran as a moderate, but will govern from the hard left. Again,
watch what he does, not what he says.

6. Obama doesn't really see himself as President of the United States, but more as a
ruler over the world... He sees himself above it all, trying to orchestrate &
coordinate various countries and their agendas. He sees moral equivalency in all
cultures. His apology tour in Germany and England was a prime example of how he sees
America, as an imperialist nation that has been arrogant, rather than a great noble
nation that has at times made errors. This is the first President ever who has
chastised our allies and appeased our enemies!

7. He is now handing out goodies. He hopes that the bill (and pain) will not come due
until after he is reelected in 2012. He would like to blame all problems on Bush from
the past, and hopefully his successor in the future. He has a huge ego, and Dr.
Krauthammer believes he is a narcissist.

8. Republicans are in the wilderness for a while, but will emerge strong. Republicans
are pining for another Reagan, but there will never be another like him. Krauthammer
believes Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty & Bobby Jindahl (except for his terrible speech in
February) are the future of the party. Newt Gingrich is brilliant, but has baggage.
Sarah Palin is sincere and intelligent, but needs to really be seriously boning up on
facts and info if she is to be a serious candidate in the future... We need to return
to the party of lower taxes, smaller government, personal responsibility, strong
national defense, and state's rights.

9. The current level of spending is irresponsible and outrageous. We are spending
trillions that we don't have... This could lead to hyperinflation, depression or
worse. No country has ever spent themselves into prosperity. The media is giving
Obama, Reid and Pelosi a pass because they love their agenda. But eventually the bill
will come due and people will realize the huge bailouts didn't work, nor will the
stimulus package. These were trillion-dollar payoffs to Obama's allies, unions and
the Congress to placate the left, so he can get support for #4 above.

10. The election was over in mid-September when Lehman brothers failed, fear and
panic swept in, we had an unpopular President, and the war was grinding on
indefinitely without a clear outcome. The people are in pain, and the mantra of
change caused people to act emotionally. Any Dem would have won this election; it was
surprising it was as close as it was.

11. In 2012, if the unemployment rate is over 10%, Republicans will be swept back
into power. If it's under 8%, the Dems continue to roll. If it's between 8-10%, it
will be a dogfight. It will all be about the economy. I hope this gets you really
thinking about what's happening in Washington and Congress. There is a left-wing
revolution going on, according to Krauthammer, and he encourages us to keep the faith
and join the loyal resistance. The work will be hard, but we're right on most issues
and can reclaim our country, before it's far too late.

Do yourself a long term favor, send this to all who will listen to an intelligent
assessment of the big picture. All our futures and children's futures depend on our
good understanding of what is really going on in DC, and our action pursuant to that
understanding! It really IS up to each of us to take individual action! Start with
educating your friends and neighbors!!!

[Sexual Harassment Panda]

AmericanMorn wrote:

> On Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:25:27 -0500, "Clay North" <sull...@live.ca> wrote:
>
>>
>>Last night on Fox news political specialist Charles Krauthammer attacked
>>Herman Cain for the latter's alleging that the recent slanderous smear
>>attack on Cain is probably a conspiracy of liberals, the "Democrat Machine"
>>and Cain, according to Beltway conservative Krauthammer made a bad mistake
>>in earlier suggesting that the Perry campaign may be involved.
>>
>>Wasn't that the keystone of the political philosophy of the late Marxist
>>idol of Obama, Saul Alinksy--to strive for the personal destruction of one's
>>adversaries. Krauthammer should here apologize for his dumb naiveté?
>>
>
> I could wax eloquently about the man I believe Dr. Krauthammer is, his
> abilities, contributions and the tribulations he's risen above but these are
> all covered in the
> posting below which I received June 12, 2010. Read it and weep as you realize
> how right he's been so far and how wrong you are.....AM

> 3. Obama has a ruthless quest for power. He did not come to Washington to
> make something out of himself, but rather to change everything, including
> dismantling capitalism.

What a clown. You might be impressed, but I'm laughing.

[40%��onned]

"AmericanMorn" <nos...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:oijqb7hrlhlrshefh...@4ax.com...

[JustMittAgain]

If he's sincerely honest in denying the accusations leveled against
him, armed with a high-priced lawyer, wouldn't you think HERMAN CAIN
would sue his accuser for SLANDER? Or at least threaten to do so?

[Groundskeeper Willy]

Michael Jackson just bought off the families of the kids he was
accused of molesting and didn't launch a law suit for slander, despite
how he was never convicted for anything.

Why not Herman? Or should I say the American Restaurant Association,
who forked over a years wages in termination pay to one of them.
Nice, generous package at any rate.

[§pamÐuster]

"JustMittAgain" <slipu...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:17770373-d076-4373...@a5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...

[David Johnston]

On 11/9/2011 3:25 PM, Clay North wrote:
>
> Last night on Fox news political specialist Charles Krauthammer attacked
> Herman Cain for the latter's alleging that the recent slanderous smear
> attack on Cain is probably a conspiracy of liberals, the "Democrat
> Machine" and Cain, according to Beltway conservative Krauthammer made a
> bad mistake in earlier suggesting that the Perry campaign may be involved.
>
> Wasn't that the keystone of the political philosophy of the late Marxist
> idol of Obama, Saul Alinksy--to strive for the personal destruction of
> one's adversaries. Krauthammer should here apologize for his dumb naiveté?
>
> But Cain should not be blamed for reacting this way to these obvious
> conspiratorial attempts to destroy his campaign for the Republican
> nomination and the presidency.
> Look where the innuendos and malicious rumors came from, "Politico
> Magazine" which is a Democrat rag founded and run by liberals

So?

> Now it has been revealed that Cain's first accuser is a neighbor of
> Democrat David Axelrod in Chicago. Axelrod who ran Obama's 2008
> campaign, was his Chief of Staff at the White House and is now heading
> Obama's 2012 reelection campaign. This "troubled" woman also has a very
> questionable past. And Cain has not been her first target for the
> accusation of sexual harassment.

So let me get this straight. In the early 1990s when the first
accusation was made, Axelrod knew that fifteen years later he'd help a
man get elected who might later face Herman Cain. So he got his
neighbour to accuse Cain of harassment. That is some impressive long
term planning. But were they neighbours in the 1990s?

[SaPeIsMa]

"David Johnston" <Da...@block.net> wrote in message
news:jaf182$1tc$1...@dont-email.me...

Actually, it's really impressive fantasy on your part to redirect the
subject..