Liberals Want To Kill Free Speech, So We Patriots Must Fight Back

[Joe Cooper]

Understand that if America is stupid enough to let liberals take power
again, they will persecute and prosecute normal Americans like us who
dare to dissent. That’s not a guess or a prediction – that’s a commitment
they have made to their fascist followers. They’ve seen what the truth
can do to their schemes. After 2016, there’s no way they are going to
take a chance on another electoral rejection by us normals, so they don’t
even pretend to support free speech anymore. It will be one gender
neutral being-one vote, one more time, and then never again.

Hold on. That’s clearly nuts, right? This is obviously crazy talk that’s
talking crazy, isn’t it? Don’t liberals love free speech?

No.

We know they don’t love free speech because they tell us they don’t, in
both words and deeds. The whole free speech thing lost a lot of its
luster for the libs when people like us decided to try it out. The
liberals didn’t count on that – free speech was supposed to be their jam,
a way to offend, annoy, and outrage us squares, to blow our bourgeois
minds with their transgressive, no-holds-barred free thoughtery and
critical thinkery. But they never intended for it to allow those banjo-
strumming rubes living between I-5 and I-95 to express wrong thoughts and
thereby win elections.

So now the progressives are trying to do something about it. Recently,
every single Democrat voted to effectively repeal the First Amendment.
You see, the words “Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of
speech” were too expansive for liberals’ tastes because they prevented
Congress from making laws abridging the freedom of speech.

This creepy idiocy was in response to Citizens United, a Supreme Court
case that, to people who actually believe in free speech and not liberal
fascism, conforms to the First Amendment by telling the federal
government that no, you can’t put people in jail for making a movie
critical of Hillary Clinton.

Yes, you read it correctly. Democrats think that Congress should be able
to make laws to put people in jail for making movies critical of Democrat
politicians. Roll that around in your head for a while.

Now, they call it “campaign finance reform,” and their argument is that
they aren’t really limiting speech - just limiting how people spend their
own money. Apparently, under the First Amendment, we are allowed to say
anything we want, but Congress can pass a law telling us that we just
can’t spend any money to actually be heard.

It would mean the government can tell us we can’t buy paper, we can’t buy
ads, we can’t buy video tape, we can’t pay a film crew or writers, and we
can’t pay for airtime. Congress could even tell us we can’t buy internet
access to post our thoughts on Twitter or Facebook. And Congress, in the
Dems’ utopia, could even pass a law not letting you spend a few measly
pennies to buy my awesome book about how liberals will split our country
in two.

Yes, they want to be able to ban books.

Other than that, under the liberals’ paradigm, we can speak to our hearts
content, though only to people within shouting range. But don’t worry.
The official, approved mainstream media would be exempt – and unofficial,
unapproved media, well, not so much. “Fake news” and all that – “fake”
being defined as “critical of liberals.” Fortunately, we’d have such
unbiased, nonpartisan, objective outlets like the New York Times and CNN
(starring noted free speech scholar Fredo Cuomo) to provide us open
forums to air our conservative views. Also, we could get unicorns to
skywrite our opinions for free using rainbows spewing from beneath their
fluffy tails.

What’s still unclear is what prison sentence Democrats would impose upon
someone who breaks the law by exhibiting a film or writing a book
critical of Hillary Clinton. One year? Five years? Life in SuperMax? Come
on Democrats, how long would you imprison someone for illegal speech?

And what should the penalty be for climate change denial? Since rejecting
their weird climate religion is Earth-murder, or something, you would
think they’d want to burn you at the stake – or is that too carbony?

Then there’s that clinical moron Howard Dean, who is ironically famous
for his own bizarre exercise of the First Amendment. Leveraging all his
intellectual fire power, he recently unloaded his mental squirt gun upon
those of us who think the First Amendment means what it actually says.
“Hate speech is not protected by the First Amendment,” he announced on
Twitter, apparently having discovered a constitutional exception that
would allow Democrats to stifle any speech they choose to stick the “hate
speech” label on. Which would, of course, be anything and everything we
normals want to say.

This “I don’t like what you are saying so it’s hate speech now shut-up”
footnote to the First Amendment is well-known at our colleges and
universities. These bastions of free thinking freely admit thinking that
we normals have no right to think freely at all. The fact that California
law enforcement is regularly ordered to stand back and allow conservative
speakers and their audiences to be intimidated and beaten in order to
silence them is just a preview of the new America that liberals dream of.
If you imagine the unholy love child of the economic basket case/police
state of Venezuela and the grim intolerance of your local campus, you
have a pretty good idea of the new, fascist America the Democrats seek to
breed.

Think that analysis is wrong? Well, here’s a complete list of all
prominent Democrats standing up against these free speech abominations:

_________________________________________________.

Liberals should be ashamed of themselves, but then they wouldn’t be
liberal if they were born with shame genes. So, since we patriots are the
only ones who actually support free speech, what do we patriots do to
protect it?

Whatever it takes.

We fight peacefully in the political arena, in the courts, and in the
shrinking marketplace of ideas while we can, but we must also be ready to
fight in the streets when those punky puffboys try to shut us up. No
quarter, no compromise, no surrender – we fight and win, or they shut us
up forever.

Look, the left has told us what it wants – the power to force us to be
silent and submit. That’s not wacky supposition; that’s not fevered
imagination. They are open about their agenda, and it’s happening before
our eyes. To pretend that our republic is not facing an existential
threat from progressives who would use violence to silence their
political opponents is to willfully ignore the evidence, just like a
climate cultist ignores cold weather. And the violence has already begun:
in fact, it is key to their plan for a free speech-free future. Today
it’s gangs of masked thugs attacking us. Tomorrow, it’s uniformed men
with guns – or at least those few spineless cowards among our security
forces will ignore their oaths to defend the Constitution in exchange for
a paycheck and a pension – dragging us off to jail for illegal speech. Or
worse.

We patriots face a stark choice. We could choose the easy path of
submission and hope that the left will leave us be if we just give in to
their demands and give up on our right to participate in our own
governance. But that won’t ever work – the true joy of leftism comes from
imposing the leftists’ collective will upon its designated villains, and
one guess as to the identity of those designated villains.

Hi.

No, they don’t want to leave us alone – that misses the whole point of
being a leftist. A leftist yearns to be the one doing the bullying and
dominating. If we give in, we will spend the rest of our lives with their
soft, girly hands around our necks.

And if we are so gutless as to give up our God-given rights in exchange
for “peace,” we deserve that pathetic, dishonorable fate.

But we won’t give up. We won’t surrender. No matter how hard they punch,
as Instapundit urges, we’ll punch back twice as hard.

It was funny seeing those antifa dorks get wedgies in Berkeley, but our
enemies are serious about stripping us of the rights that our Creator
endowed upon all men and women. Many of us are veterans or law
enforcement, and our oaths to defend the Constitution even at the cost of
our lives did not come with an expiration date. Millions more who did not
take one of those oaths subscribe to them nonetheless. We promised not to
let a fascist regime take hold, and we intend to keep our promise.

The First Amendment is followed by the Second Amendment for just this
reason – history will record that our people’s unique refusal to be
disarmed by those who seek to steal our liberties was a key factor why we
will never be Venezuela II: The Revenge.

Our only chance of avoiding a catastrophe is if our would-be progressive
overlords understand that for us normal Americans, there are only two
possible outcomes. And living at their mercy as their serfs is not one of
them.

The outcome we want is that we normals live free in a democratic republic
exercising the rights enshrined in the Constitution, whether because
leftists choose to respect our civil rights, or because we force them to
respect our civil rights.

The other alternative is that we die on piles of spent brass surrounded
by the bodies of our enemies. Either one’s cool – but submission to
slavery is not an option.

That un-American, wannabe fascist Howard Dean need only look at a license
plate from neighboring New Hampshire to understand how this is going to
end. We’ll either live free or die.

Source: http://bit.ly/2q7hFHk

--
"Liberals don’t hold other liberals to different standards; they hold
them to no standards. Standards are reserved exclusively for
conservatives, mostly because they know we have them and they mean
something." (Derek Hunter)