FILM PROOF: The Moon Landing was Faked
AllSeeing-I
and others, admit in a BBC Documentary and have been recorded
admitting ---the moon landing is a fake and they could not send back
pictures.
Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUOItuKm5UE&feature=related
Part 4 They will not be able to send back images. Nixon was mad.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mr_yNefhINw
Watch all of the parts for the truth. Start at part 1
Coming up next?
Why Humans Are Not Apes.
AllSeeing-I
wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 19:46:35 -0700 (PDT), AllSeeing-I
> settles it. I agree with the others that you must certainly be a
> troll. No real person can be that inconsistent, not even a christer.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
You seem to be under the strangest impression that I give a rats ass
what you think.
Caranx latus
> Kissinger, Rumsfeld, Alexander Haig, Nixon's Secretary, the CIA Chief,
> and others, admit in a BBC Documentary and have been recorded
> admitting ---the moon landing is a fake and they could not send back
> pictures.
>
>
> Part 4 They will not be able to send back images. Nixon was mad.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mr_yNefhINw
>
> Watch all of the parts for the truth. Start at part 1
>
> Coming up next?
> Why Humans Are Not Apes.
I assume that you didn't read the description of the video. If you
had, you might have seen this:
"This is not an 'ordinary' documentary... It's intent is to inform and
entertain the viewer, but also to shake him up, make him aware of the
fact that television can get it wrong (intentionally or not) .We want
to achieve this aim by using a universally known event (the landing on
the Moon) that is surrounded by question marks (which is a fact) and
spin some tale around it, that sounds plausible but isn't a fact
(although there are elements in it that are real!). Confused? It will
all be revealed before the end of the film... once the viewer is
hooked, strung along and starts really wondering. The Message is
simple.. Do not believe what you see on Television or in the News.."
Do you see what they're doing? They're taking a "universally known
event" and spinning "some tale around it that sounds plausible but
isn't a fact". You've been suckered in. Well done.
All Seeing I
Did you watch it? Did you see the people I mentioned admit to it?
No. Of course not
Ken
ASSman:
.
>
> I assume that you didn't read the description of the video. If you
> had, you might have seen this:
>
> "This is not an 'ordinary' documentary... It's intent is to inform and
> entertain the viewer, but also to shake him up, make him aware of the
> fact that television can get it wrong (intentionally or not) .We want
> to achieve this aim by using a universally known event (the landing on
> the Moon) that is surrounded by question marks (which is a fact) and
> spin some tale around it, that sounds plausible but isn't a fact
> (although there are elements in it that are real!). Confused? It will
> all be revealed before the end of the film... once the viewer is
> hooked, strung along and starts really wondering. The Message is
> simple.. Do not believe what you see on Television or in the News.."
>
> Do you see what they're doing? They're taking a "universally known
> event" and spinning "some tale around it that sounds plausible but
> isn't a fact". You've been suckered in. Well done.
Proof that ASSman isn't just an ordinary troll but a universally
gullible Fuckwadd of a Troll
Caranx latus
[M]adape, the purpose of this "documentary" is supposed to be to
instill the idea in the viewer that they shouldn't believe everything
they see on TV. The documentary is being self-referential. They're
spinning a not implausible but false story and trying to suck the
audience in before the big reveal at the end. Did you watch it all the
way through?
bpuharic
>Kissinger, Rumsfeld, Alexander Haig, Nixon's Secretary, the CIA Chief,
>and others, admit in a BBC Documentary and have been recorded
>admitting ---the moon landing is a fake and they could not send back
>pictures.
gee. too bad they didnt. in fact they never mention it
and you are SUCH a WHORE you believe ANY and ALL fringe ideas
the moon landing was fake
9/11 was a govt job
astrology
UFO's
etc etc ...in fact you're just the definition of GULLIBLE
>
>Part 1
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUOItuKm5UE&feature=related
>
>Part 4 They will not be able to send back images. Nixon was mad.
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mr_yNefhINw
i've bounced signals off the moon. any ham can do it. you're just mad
'cuz i bitchslapped you when you said fish were warm blooded just like
mammals.
Mitchell Holman
de4665...@n2g2000prj.googlegroups.com:
You still haven't told us your theory on the
laser reflectors on the moon. If our astronauts
didn't put them there then who did?
If you cannot answer this one point then
your whole argument falls apart.
It�s Not Just The Astronauts That Are Getting Older
MARCH 10, 2010
Representing what may be the first long term lunar
environmental impact study, recent laser ranging
data from the Apache Point Observatory in New Mexico
suggests the Lunar Ranging Retro Reflectors (LRRRs)
left on the Moon by Apollo missions 11, 14 and 15
are beginning to shows signs of age.
Apache Point Observatory�s Lunar Laser-ranging Operation
(the acronym says it all) has been collecting ranging
data from the LRRRs since 2006, using a 3.5 metre
telescope and a 532 nm laser.
A typical APOLLO observing session involves shooting
the laser at the largest of the LRRRs (Apollo 15�s)
over a �run� of four to eight minutes. Each shot sends
about 1017 photons to the Moon, from which only one
returned photon per shot may be detected. This is why
the laser is shot thousands of times at a 20 Hz
repetition rate during each run. If the return signal
from the Apollo 15 LRRR is good, the laser is then
directed to fire at the Apollo 11 and 14 reflectors.
http://www.universetoday.com/59310/it%E2%80%99s-not-just-the-astronauts-
that-are-getting-older/
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1003/1003.0713v1.pdf
R Brown
"AllSeeing-I" <allse...@usa.com> wrote in message
news:8af2eddd-591c-4842...@n2g2000prj.googlegroups.com...
Here, have a look: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mefEKqzq8cg
Atlantis? Moon landings? Creationism?
Oh, and don't forget you are also a self-declared angel.
Nothing wrong with you is there? Nurse says you're having pudding for
dessert tonight - lucky guy!
"When you're talking with a creationist, it's not the heat, it's the
stupidity." - R.Brown
Devils Advocaat
> Kissinger, Rumsfeld, Alexander Haig, Nixon's Secretary, the CIA Chief,
> and others, admit in a BBC Documentary and have been recorded
> admitting ---the moon landing is a fake and they could not send back
> pictures.
>
>
> Part 4 They will not be able to send back images. Nixon was mad.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mr_yNefhINw
>
> Watch all of the parts for the truth. Start at part 1
>
> Coming up next?
> Why Humans Are Not Apes.
Gee maddy, I guess you have been suckered yet again.
AllSeeing-I
Running from the truth eh?
Devils Advocaat
Not at all maddy.
But it seems that you are.
ThomMadura
Actually - the statement is true - if you look at it from the
perspective of Species.
Humans are the only bi-pedal species living from the Hominidae family
and current(Homo sapiens) humans also have a larger brain volume than apes.
The fact that a separate species was required means that we are
different enough from other ape species to require another species- that
are HUMANS.
Humans first appeared on earth in the fossil record of Africa about
195,000 years ago.
Humans are most closely related to the Chimpanzee. Full genome
sequencing has resulted in the conclusion that "after 6.5 [million]
years of separate evolution, the differences between chimpanzee and
human are ten times greater than those between two unrelated people and
ten times less than those between rats and mice
In the end- we are all animals - and genetically all descended and
evolved from the first forms of life on earth.
Erwin Moller
Sometimes you are really *really* slow, Madman.
Take a day off.
With very high regards,
Erwin Moller
--
"That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without
evidence."
-- Christopher Hitchens
All Seeing I
The moon landing was a hoaX Moller. Really.
All Seeing I
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 19:46:35 -0700 (PDT), AllSeeing-I
>
> >Kissinger, Rumsfeld, Alexander Haig, Nixon's Secretary, the CIA Chief,
> >and others, admit in a BBC Documentary and have been recorded
> >admitting ---the moon landing is a fake and they could not send back
> >pictures.
>
> gee. too bad they didnt. in fact they never mention it
>
> and you are SUCH a WHORE you believe ANY and ALL fringe ideas
Whores sell it boob
You just bend over for science and give it away.
that makes you a slut
All Seeing I
It was a fake DA.
Of course you guys believe it was not a fake. You believe man is an
ape too.
Suspension of Disbelief, DA. Look it up.
Erwin Moller
Was it?
Please answer Mitchell Holman's question then: the one about the mirrors
on the moon that are used to measure the distance.
I am most curious what you will come up with.
PLEASE don't tell me God-did-it, that line gets really lame.
With suburb high regards,
All Seeing I
>
> - Show quoted text -
Landing mirrors on the moon is one thing. Landing humans and then
filming them on the moon is another.
Micro meteors would have torn the craft apart
All Seeing I
> AllSeeing-I <allseei...@usa.com> wrote in news:8af2eddd-591c-4842-81f5-
> de4665c76...@n2g2000prj.googlegroups.com:
There is a big difference between dropping some mirrors on the surface
of the moon and safely landing humans there and then filming the
event.
Devils Advocaat
Poor maddy, the "documentary" you are crowing about was mocked up.
The documentary was a fake in other words.
The moon landings were not.
By the way even Carl Linnaeus classified humans along with the other
apes.
And I bet you haven't got a shred of evidence that proves humans are
not apes.
Mark Evans
>
> - Show quoted text -
No, the moon is a hoax sponsered by the cheese industry. You don't
really think that there is a on-rotating hunk of rock over our heads,
do you? It is all a fake to give degenerate lycanthropes an excuse to
act up once a month and to provide a rhyme to "June" for writers of
love songs. Besides, there is not a single mention of the moon in the
teachings of Brian of Nazareth, which clearly shows it is of modern
origin.
Lloyd, you are slipping. Ask the folks at the Home to check your
meds.
Mark Evans
Sulfate
Ouch. I missed that. I'm sure ASI will blithely go flitting off to
the next mockumentary that supports his goofy theories, but it's nice
to see him get his big steaming load of bullshit shoveled back in his
face.
Ralph
Ah Assman, you escaped from purgatory. Since you are nothing more than a
garden variety troll...in you go again:-)))).
Ralph
Go fuck yourself Assman, I'm sure that is the only way you'll get any!
***PLONK***
John Baker
<kar...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>On Mar 14, 10:46�pm, AllSeeing-I <allseei...@usa.com> wrote:
>> Kissinger, Rumsfeld, Alexander Haig, Nixon's Secretary, the CIA Chief,
>> and others, admit in a BBC Documentary and have been recorded
>> admitting ---the moon landing is a fake and they could not send back
>> pictures.
>>
>> Part 1http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUOItuKm5UE&feature=related
>>
>> Part 4 �They will not be able to send back images. Nixon was mad.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mr_yNefhINw
>>
>> Watch all of the parts for the truth. Start at part 1
>>
>> Coming up next?
>> Why Humans Are Not Apes.
>
>I assume that you didn't read the description of the video. If you
>had, you might have seen this:
Oh, the troll read it, alright. But he was hoping you didn't.
Conan the bacterium
Conan the bacterium
Yeppers. Just like micrometeors have completely
shredded the International Space Station, right?
(I mean, they HAVE had 13 years to do it by now)
Or are these Special Scary Moon MIcro Meteors?
conan
bpuharic
<el...@priest.com> wrote:
>The moon landing was a hoaX Moller. Really.
i loved it when he said proof of this was that the technology didnt
exist to send signals to the moon
even though hams had been doing it for DECADES!!
he's SUCH A WHORE
bpuharic
<el...@priest.com> wrote:
>
>Landing mirrors on the moon is one thing. Landing humans and then
>filming them on the moon is another.
>
>Micro meteors would have torn the craft apart
gee. our satellites dont have a problem with these. even after decades
in space
seems you're fucked, again, whore
bpuharic
you're RIGHT. i'm a science SLUT!!!....cheap dresses...bright
lipstick...fishnet stockings...
but YOU ARE SUCH A WHORE for EVERY lunatic idea
arent you embarrassed to be such a WHORE
truexactly
we have a common ancestor though, and that ancestor is closer to
chimpanzee than any other ape.
Creationists seem to all the time try the spin of discrediting evolution
by saying it says we evolved from apes (as we know them today) and of
course that is
incredulous, and it suckers up alot of followers. It does not help when
atheists talk about refuting that line directly in response, and I see
that all the time too, @#!!$#!Err
*"In the end- we are all animals - and genetically all descended and
evolved from the first forms of life on earth."*
bpuharic
<el...@priest.com> wrote:
>
>> But it seems that you are
>
>It was a fake DA.
>
>Of course you guys believe it was not a fake. You believe man is an
>ape too.
>
>Suspension of Disbelief, DA. Look it up.
now let's see. he's telling us how smart he is
be believes
9/11 was a govt job
astrology is real
demons cause disease
angels have penises and mate with women
UFOs built the pyramids
and yet he complains that people accept science...
Buddythunder
Mental retardation, ASI. Maybe you want to wiki that.
k...@kymhorsell.com
> Kissinger, Rumsfeld, Alexander Haig, Nixon's Secretary, the CIA Chief,
> and others, admit in a BBC Documentary and have been recorded
> admitting ---the moon landing is a fake and they could not send back
> pictures.
Well... Rummy did at least one "mocumentary". When I saw
it a few years back I was surprised he could keep a straight face.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Side_of_the_Moon_(mockumentary)
Around that era these things were turned out on a regular basis.
It was a different time.
It sometimes took a bit of judgement when watching the tivvy back then
to decide whether what they were telling you was true or it was
"obviously a joke". The same thing went for national broadcasters
and conservative newspapers on Apr 1. I remember one TV news item
about spagetti trees...
Another great example was a little number "Forgotten Silver" from New
Zealand with interviews from various people -- even Siskell and Ebert --
that argued that everything of technical and social interest in
the 19th and 20th centuries was done in NZ first.
The first movie was made in NZ, according to the doc. It showed an amateur
scientist flying his airplane across a valley. The "film" was supposedly
made in c1880. The reason you probably never heard of it was the plane
crashed into the movie camera and destroyed it, so the argument went.
The same inventor -- Colin McKenzie -- allegedly went on to invent color
motion pictures. He filmed some indiginous NZ-ers carrying plakards when
some British royal visited the country. I.e. the first civil rights
demonstration.
McKenzie went on to produce the first epic movie -- that looked a lot
like Raiders of the Lost Ark -- but as proof the documentary showed the
sets were still to be found up in the hills somewhere in the backblocks
of the NZ high country.
Like "Dark Side" "Silver" started off simple, but got more and more
outrageous as it progressed. The idea, it seems, is to see when the
viewer suddenly shouts out "this has GOT to be a joke; I don't care
who the Hell they have vouching for what they say, it is just all
completely impossible".
But the problem with such jokes is they can be taken seriously.
The character Alf Garnett in the Brit comedy "Till Death Us Do Part"
(later borrowed as Archie Bunker "All in the Family" in the US)
was so right wing he was intended by the producers and writers as
an object of fun. He was always rabbiting on about Jesus being an white
Englishman, about the infallibility of the Brit royals and how
the upper crust *was* better than the rest of us, and the threat
to English cuisine and good manners posed by "Pakis" and immigrants
to the UK from the West Indies.
Unfortunately it seems many of the people whom Alf parodied took
the series seriously and a vindication of their self-contradictory views.
Speight and others later expressed some regret at making the series because
of that.
--
[Defunding inconvenient science:]
My constituents should not have to continue to foot the bill for an
organization to keep producing corrupt findings that can be used as
justification to impose a massive new energy tax on every American
-- Rep Blaine Leutkemeyer (R-MO), 18 Feb 2011
Meteorite Debris
away at his/her stone these gems of wisdom for posterity ...
> On Mar 14, 10:46 pm, AllSeeing-I <allseei...@usa.com> wrote:
> > Kissinger, Rumsfeld, Alexander Haig, Nixon's Secretary, the CIA Chief,
> > and others, admit in a BBC Documentary and have been recorded
> > admitting ---the moon landing is a fake and they could not send back
> > pictures.
> >
> > Part 1http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUOItuKm5UE&feature=related
> >
> > Part 4 They will not be able to send back images. Nixon was mad.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mr_yNefhINw
> >
> > Watch all of the parts for the truth. Start at part 1
> >
> > Coming up next?
> > Why Humans Are Not Apes.
>
> I assume that you didn't read the description of the video. If you
> had, you might have seen this:
>
> "This is not an 'ordinary' documentary... It's intent is to inform and
> entertain the viewer, but also to shake him up, make him aware of the
> fact that television can get it wrong (intentionally or not) .We want
> to achieve this aim by using a universally known event (the landing on
> the Moon) that is surrounded by question marks (which is a fact) and
> spin some tale around it, that sounds plausible but isn't a fact
> (although there are elements in it that are real!). Confused? It will
> all be revealed before the end of the film... once the viewer is
> hooked, strung along and starts really wondering. The Message is
> simple.. Do not believe what you see on Television or in the News.."
>
> Do you see what they're doing? They're taking a "universally known
> event" and spinning "some tale around it that sounds plausible but
> isn't a fact". You've been suckered in. Well done.
AllSeeing will not allow a few facts to get in the way of a good story.
--
Remove both YOUR_SHOES before replying
apatriot #1, atheist #1417,
Chief EAC prophet
Jason Gastrich prayed for me on 8 January 2009 and nothing happened.
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make
you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
Geode
> On Mar 14, 10:02 pm, Caranx latus <kar...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> No. Of course not
I watched this documentary on the satellite. It was very well done.
the question that results is that it is damned difficult to be sure of
anything, except is a little easier when you watched yourself
something. But we can never be certain that Oswald killed Kennedy, or
any other event of widespread knowledge.
It is like the question of god. We cannot be sure that god exists,
for it never drinks a beer with me. Well, I have a friend who drinks a
beer and he says he is god. he says is the reincarnation of Krishna
but he do want to perform any miracles, for he do not want to attract
a crowd around him. He is a god that goes incognito.
Well, why I would reject the is really a god? I cannot be sure.
Probably he is not more than a fucking liar. Well, even if he is the
god Krishna, I do not pay any of the beers he drinks. He had asked me
several times, why do you not pay for the beers of god?
I replied to him, fuck you. It is you, the god, that should pay for
my beers, not otherwise. You are almighty, aren't you? Then perform
a fucking miracle. But this Krisha is rather tight fisted.
Geode
.
Free Lunch
<epicurusboth@YOUR_SHOESaapt.net.au> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
Or even an absurd one.
Immortalist
> Kissinger, Rumsfeld, Alexander Haig, Nixon's Secretary, the CIA Chief,
> and others, admit in a BBC Documentary and have been recorded
> admitting ---the moon landing is a fake and they could not send back
> pictures.
>
> Part 1http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUOItuKm5UE&feature=related
>
> Part 4 They will not be able to send back images. Nixon was mad.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mr_yNefhINw
>
The real question is what difference will it make to us if the moon
landing were faked, I mean why is this important to you?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZR64EF3OpA
> Watch all of the parts for the truth. Start at part 1
>
> Coming up next?
> Why Humans Are Not Apes.
Good luck coming against better theories that make you into a bloody
ape bloak.
Caranx latus
> On Mar 14, 10:02 pm, Caranx latus <kar...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > > Kissinger, Rumsfeld, Alexander Haig, Nixon's Secretary, the CIA Chief,
> > > and others, admit in a BBC Documentary and have been recorded
> > > admitting ---the moon landing is a fake and they could not send back
> > > pictures.
>
> > > Part 1http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUOItuKm5UE&feature=related
>
> > > Part 4 They will not be able to send back images. Nixon was mad.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mr_yNefhINw
>
>
> > > Coming up next?
> > > Why Humans Are Not Apes.
>
> > had, you might have seen this:
>
> > "This is not an 'ordinary' documentary... It's intent is to inform and
> > entertain the viewer, but also to shake him up, make him aware of the
> > fact that television can get it wrong (intentionally or not) .We want
> > to achieve this aim by using a universally known event (the landing on
> > the Moon) that is surrounded by question marks (which is a fact) and
> > spin some tale around it, that sounds plausible but isn't a fact
> > (although there are elements in it that are real!). Confused? It will
> > all be revealed before the end of the film... once the viewer is
> > hooked, strung along and starts really wondering. The Message is
> > simple.. Do not believe what you see on Television or in the News.."
>
> > Do you see what they're doing? They're taking a "universally known
> > event" and spinning "some tale around it that sounds plausible but
> > isn't a fact". You've been suckered in. Well done.
>
>
> No. Of course not
[M]adape, I have just finished watching all 9 parts of the documentary
that you linked to. Let me be absolutely clear about this:
You. Have. Been. Taken. In.
Go back and listen again to what the major "players" in this "game"
actually say. Nixon, Haig, Rumsfeld, and Kissinger and a few others
whose names I don't recall... None of them say anything specific. Not
one. The story is spun by the narrator and the documentary consists of
vaguely worded snippets cribbed from interviews most likely on other
subjects. There's one place in the program where the sound editing
makes it seem like a bunch of them are in the same room, but it is
crystal clear from the visuals that all of them are in different
locations.
There are minor characters in the piece who do say specific things.
Did you look at the end credits? It meant nothing to you that the
music changed from somber and serious to flippant and goofy? Or that
there is a brief blooper reel that plays there about several of the
*actors* who have forgotten their lines? One of the guys actually asks
for the script and gets it, for crying out loud.
I noticed in the first section the use of music originally recorded
for the movie Vertigo. I thought that that was one of the most clever
things in the entire work. Vertigo features a character in its first
half who, as we learn later, is not what she appears to be.
This "documentary" is nothing of the sort. It's been purposely blended
together from disparate sources to appear to be something meaningful.
It isn't. As the description for the piece says, you shouldn't believe
everything you see.
The only reason why you latched onto it is because it expresses
conspiratorial views that you already hold. To anyone who doesn't hold
those views, there's nothing convincing about it. If you want to be
convinced of this (and you don't), try watching it again and ignore
anything that the narrator and minor characters have to say. Focus
only on the big names. They don't say anything significant at all.
Caranx latus
More information, even though you've probably fled the thread,
[M]adape.
Here's a link to an interview (in French) with William Karel, the
director of the "documentary" that hooked you and landed you. If you
translate it into English using any of the various services available
as browser extensions, the result won't be perfect but it's clear
enough.
<http://web.archive.org/web/20071228130319/http://www.arte.tv/fr/
histoire-societe/archives/operation-lune/William-Karel/385476.html>
Here's a (not terrific) translation of part of the interview:
"How did you do with the protagonists of your film? How have you
convinced to enter the game?
None entered the game! The idea was to divert the talks, and we put no
confidence in the witnesses, nor the people from NASA, Aldrin neither
nor Kubrick's wife, or brother thereof. There are just seven actors
who were given a text and play some witnesses. The images of Nixon's
advisers come from the movie Men of the White House. By diverting
their testimony, it was enough to have a "false" witness in the case
of Nixon's secretary, to link and make the story credible. The "real"
witnesses, we said we were doing a film about Kubrick in his film on
the Moon or NASA, and we ask questions a little vague ..."
Caranx latus
No response to any of this, [M]adape? Your intellectual cowardice
makes me sad.
big john whine
suckered in?
but it's probably you that watches too much tv.
Caranx latus
Were you trying to make a point?
big john whine
>
> - Show quoted text -
you didn't get it?
Caranx latus
What was it about my question that you had difficulty with?