Hitler Was Enabled By Shill Media Exactly, & I Mean _Exactly_, Like tRUMP Today

[Bret Cahill]

Shultzberger Sr. did much more than "merely omit" the Holocaust by burying the 3 short articles on it during WWII.

The anglo robber baron controlled media of the early 20th Century was doing everything possible to help their paymasters undermine democratic freedom. Thomas Edison even took time from inventing to discuss how they slandered Thomas Paine as a wacko.

Read Tocqueville. Undermine the sovereignty of the people and the bodies _will_ stack up.

This will happen

_every_

_single_

_time_.

Krugman obviously knows full well the legacy media including the _New York Times_ are the source of the problem. There is no way he can _not_ know. It would be like NASA landing the Rover on Mars and then pretending they never heard of F=ma.

Krugman just needs to reveal it carefully so that he doesn't get fired.

The shill media ain't got nuthin' like tenure or feral judgeships.

Shultzberger Jr. and Krugman must spend all their time rationalizing that _overall_ the _New York Times_ is a net plus to society.

There is absolutely no reason to believe you can support honest writers and the truth on income derived from hookers, pimps and shills and be a net plus to society.

Run the shill media out of the Democratic Party ASAP.

Thomas Jefferson had the right attitude:

To William Short

Philadelphia Jan. 3. 1793.

Dear Sir

My last private letter to you was of Oct. 16. since which I have recieved your1 No. 103. 107. 108. 109. 110. 112. 113. and 114. and yesterday your private one of Sep. 15. came to hand. The tone of your2 letters had for some time given me pain,3 on account of the extreme warmth with which they censured the proceedings of the Jacobins of France. I considered that sect as the same with the Republican patriots, and the Feuillants as the Monarchical patriots, well known in the early part of the revolution, and but little distant in their views, both having in object the establishment of a free constitution, and differing only on the question whether their chief Executive should be hereditary or not. The Jacobins (as since called) yeilded to the Feuillants and tried the experiment of retaining their hereditary Executive. The experiment failed completely, and would have brought on the reestablishment of despotism had it been pursued.4 The Jacobins saw this, and that the expunging that officer was of absolute necessity, and the Nation was with them in opinion, for however they might have been formerly for the constitution framed by the first assembly, they were come over from their hope in it, and were now generally Jacobins. In the struggle which was necessary, many guilty persons fell without the forms of trial, and with them some innocent. These I deplore as much as any body, and shall deplore some of them to the day of my death. But I deplore them as I should have done had they fallen in battle. It was necessary to use the arm of the people, a machine not quite so blind as balls and bombs, but blind to a certain degree. A few of their cordial friends met at their hands5 the fate of enemies. But time and truth will rescue and embalm their memories, while their posterity will be enjoying that very liberty for which they would never have hesitated to offer up their lives. The liberty of the whole earth was depending on the issue of the contest, and was ever such a prize won with so little innocent blood? My own affections have been deeply wounded by some of the martyrs to this cause, but rather than it should have failed, I would have seen half the earth desolated. Were there but an Adam and an Eve left in every country, and left free, it would be better than as it now is.

[Topaz]

By Richard Edmonds

The facts on the "Holocaust" have been exposed years ago in a
trial in Toronto, Canada. The defendant in the dock was the
German-Canadian, Ernst Zundel, accused by the State prosecuter of
disputing the claim that during the Second World War the Germans had
murdered millions of Jews in purpose-built gas-chambers.

This trial, held in 1985 against Ernst Zundel, is of greatest
importance due to the evidence given at the court by an expert
witness. Professor Raul Hilberg of the University of Vermont, USA,
was recognized by the court to be the world expert on the alleged
"Holocaust". In open court and under oath, Professor Hilberg stated
that he knew of no independent, forensic scientific for the existence
anywhere of a gas-chamber, planned built and operated by the Germans
during the Second World War for the purpose of killing, murdering or
executing Jews or any other persons. Professor Hilberg further stated
that with regard to causes of death in the whole extent of
German-occupied Europe during the Second World War, he was unable to
supply the court with a single autopsy certificate, stating the cause
of death of a single individual to be due to poisoning by cyanide gas.
Cyanide gas was the highly toxic gas allegedly used in the alleged
German gas-chambers.

The origin of the "Holocaust" allegation is to be found in the
trial that the victorious Allies organized against the defeated
Germans foes in the years following the War, at the German city of
Nuremberg. The victorious allies were, of course, the United Stated of
America, the Soviet Union of Josef Stalin, Great Britain and France.
At this trial of the defeated German leaders, the Allies were
simultaneously Judge, Jury, Prosecutor, and Hangman in their own case
and in their own court. The Allies' Nuremberg trial was publicly
condemned at the time by principled, leading Americans. The Chief
Justice of the US Supreme Court, Judge Harlan F. Stone, condemned the
trial as a "lynching". US Senator Robert Taft condemned the Allies'
trial, as a "travesty and a perversion of justice". Taft described
America's participation as a blot on the honor of the United States.
Senator Taft predicted that in the future Europeans would condemn
America for its participation in a "lynching".

The standard rules of evidence were discarded. For example, the
Allies held that their allegations of German atrocities, printed and
published to saturation point in the Allies' war time-time press, were
to be accepted at face value as "Public Knowledge" and were of such a
notoriety that without any further independent, judicial
investigation, the Allies' court could accept them as of probative
value. If the Allies said it, then it could not be questioned.

To their undying shame, the Allies employed torture to extract
self-condemning confessions of guilt from their helpless prisoners. I
will present here two notorious examples of vicious torture.

We know that Rudolf Hoess, a former Kommandant at the Auschwitz was
captured by a special unit of the British Army at the end of the
Second World War, and we know that Hoess was tortured and beaten
almost to the point of death, and then given a choice: either to
confess to committing the murder of millions of Jews as Auschwitz, or
else, he and his family, wife and children would suffer the
consequences. Hoess' statement obtained under torture was presented
and accepted at the Allies' court as proving the claim that Auschwitz
in Poland is the location of the mass murder of millions. In response
to rumors of abuses inflicted on German prisoners of war held captive
by the US Army in post-War Germany, the American judge, Edward van
Roden was commissioned by the US Army to investigate the situation.
Van Roden examined German prisoners, and found that many had been
tortured; that more than a hundred had had their testicles crushed
beyond repair. These men had been tortured, as in the case of the
Auschwitz Kommandant Hoess, in order to extract from them the
self-condemning confessions of guilt that the Allies needed to
buttress their propaganda-lies. On his return to the USA, Judge van
Roden published his findings at press-conferences held in New York and
Chicago.

The "Holocaust" allegation is nothing but a propaganda-lie concocted
by the war- time Allies Nuremberg lynching by the cynical trampling on
all the principles of American and British jurisprudence.

The disgrace that remains is that 70 years later across most of
mainland Europe it is a criminal offense to question the findings of
the Allies Nuremberg trial.



www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com

[nickname unavailable]

On Friday, March 18, 2016 at 1:18:00 AM UTC-5, Bret Cahill wrote:
> Shultzberger Sr. did much more than "merely omit" the Holocaust by burying the 3 short articles on it during WWII.
>
> The anglo robber baron controlled media of the early 20th Century was doing everything possible to help their paymasters undermine democratic freedom. Thomas Edison even took time from inventing to discuss how they slandered Thomas Paine as a wacko.
>

the real way to end this, is not only have americans figured out that losing their jobs and wealth is not for the common good, and have turned off the legacy media by the tens of millions, is like you say, discredit the legacy media fully, but also undue bill clintons traitorous deregulation of the media.
as we reregulate them , we use the founders statements about a free and open press, to take out the profit motivation, and make them non profits for the common good.
the press cannot be open and free, if its owned or influenced by unamerican activities.

> Read Tocqueville. Undermine the sovereignty of the people and the bodies _will_ stack up.
>
> This will happen
>
> _every_
>
> _single_
>
> _time_.
>

its why clinton aimed to undue the constitution. its another backdoor attempt at gutting sovereignty.

> Krugman obviously knows full well the legacy media including the _New York Times_ are the source of the problem. There is no way he can _not_ know. It would be like NASA landing the Rover on Mars and then pretending they never heard of F=ma.
>
> Krugman just needs to reveal it carefully so that he doesn't get fired.
>

krugman is for hire right now, his obvious attack on bernie proves it.

> The shill media ain't got nuthin' like tenure or feral judgeships.
>
> Shultzberger Jr. and Krugman must spend all their time rationalizing that _overall_ the _New York Times_ is a net plus to society.
>

yep, elites always think they are indispensable.

> There is absolutely no reason to believe you can support honest writers and the truth on income derived from hookers, pimps and shills and be a net plus to society.
>

neo-liberalism can justify just about anything, remember, losing your job and wealth is for the common good, now lets go shopping.

> Run the shill media out of the Democratic Party ASAP.
>

you mean thomas friedman is not a asset:)))

> Thomas Jefferson had the right attitude:
>
> To William Short
>
> Philadelphia Jan. 3. 1793.
>
> Dear Sir
>
> My last private letter to you was of Oct. 16. since which I have recieved your1 No. 103. 107. 108. 109. 110. 112. 113. and 114. and yesterday your private one of Sep. 15. came to hand. The tone of your2 letters had for some time given me pain,3 on account of the extreme warmth with which they censured the proceedings of the Jacobins of France. I considered that sect as the same with the Republican patriots, and the Feuillants as the Monarchical patriots, well known in the early part of the revolution, and but little distant in their views, both having in object the establishment of a free constitution, and differing only on the question whether their chief Executive should be hereditary or not. The Jacobins (as since called) yeilded to the Feuillants and tried the experiment of retaining their hereditary Executive. The experiment failed completely, and would have brought on the reestablishment of despotism had it been pursued.4 The Jacobins saw this, and that the expunging that officer was of absolute necessity, and the Nation was with them in opinion, for however they might have been formerly for the constitution framed by the first assembly, they were come over from their hope in it, and were now generally Jacobins. In the struggle which was necessary, many guilty persons fell without the forms of trial, and with them some innocent. These I deplore as much as any body, and shall deplore some of them to the day of my death. But I deplore them as I should have done had they fallen in battle. It was necessary to use the arm of the people, a machine not quite so blind as balls and bombs, but blind to a certain degree. A few of their cordial friends met at their hands5 the fate of enemies. But time and truth will rescue and embalm their memories, while their posterity will be enjoying that very liberty for which they would never have hesitated to offer up their lives. The liberty of the whole earth was depending on the issue of the contest, and was ever such a prize won with so little innocent blood? My own affections have been deeply wounded by some of the martyrs to this cause, but rather than it should have failed, I would have seen half the earth desolated. Were there but an Adam and an Eve left in every country, and left free, it would be better than as it now is.

when bill clinton was warned about deregulating the economy, and what it will do to america, he said its different this time.
right away the shills in the media took that up, and flooded america with crap stink tank papers and reporting extolling the rational, self policing market, corporate safe guards, technology that will limit the excess,s yaba daba do.
but that is not what clinton meant, as with any good sociopath, what he said had two meanings, the meaning that meant the most to him and the coming oligarchy, was that this time you cannot touch us.
technology moves things so fast now, i doubt a slavish shill like clinton, could imagine that about 65,000 factories could move to china in the flash of a eye, and that wall street could rig itself for implosion in 7 short years. it did not even hang together long enough for him to leave office.
the only thing that saved us was 911, and bush saying lets go shopping. that lasted till 2006, now we have been in a depression since then.
and every year it gets worse. massive areas in america now, look and act like a third world. its to big to hide any more. and keynes warnings about free trade, are traveling like lightning all over the world.

[Bret Cahill]

That works both ways. If Tocqueville and Gerstner are correct then the redistribution of tens of trillions of wealth could be much faster than previous events.

This is great news as long as you don't get killed. Right now Obama is building the case for invading Deash.

If tRUMP gets into office he'll start a nuke war with Russia.

> i doubt a slavish shill like clinton, could imagine that about 65,000 factories could move to china in the flash of a eye, and that wall street could rig itself for implosion in 7 short years.

Most people aren't economists and those who are are generally shills and the few who do manage to get their eyes above the murky water for a second are shouted down.

That's why state universities need to eliminate their economics departments altogether.

Let Koch have the field and then everyone can join in and ridicule the field into oblivion.

> it did not even hang together long enough for him to leave office.
> the only thing that saved us was 911, and bush saying lets go shopping. that lasted till 2006, now we have been in a depression since then.
> and every year it gets worse. massive areas in america now, look and act like a third world. its to big to hide any more. and keynes warnings about free trade, are traveling like lightning all over the world.

What do you have to say to the parents of the children massacred at Sandy Hook?

[nickname unavailable]

as we are told repeatedly daily by the train wreck in the white house, and the legacy shills, that things are great, we are adding jobs like crazy, the economy has never been on sounder footing. actually, people are staying home, hoarding what little they have, if they have a home or anything to horde that is.
its march, look at the stores, malls, places to eat, they are either empty, or very quite, with little buying going on right now.
even the little hikes in gas prices are putting many tightly against the wall. the reporting of unemployment and the creation of jobs, is at best, a really bad comedy, no one really believes it, unless you have the mentality of the train wreck.
in just a few short years, we may look at 2016 as the golden years of the economy. its steamrolling now, it cannot be stopped.

> This is great news as long as you don't get killed. Right now Obama is building the case for invading Deash.

the train wreck is one of the best suited for being a example of a out of touch, out of his league, completely unsuitable for the office, of any politician i have ever seen. and i thought clinton and bush were bad. this guy takes the cake.
bush was a burned out idiot, clinton was a high functioning, clever, manipulative, cunning sociopath.
the train wreck is trying to emulate them both, and cannot understand why no one loves him.

>
> If tRUMP gets into office he'll start a nuke war with Russia.
>

maybe. i worry more about hillary.

> > i doubt a slavish shill like clinton, could imagine that about 65,000 factories could move to china in the flash of a eye, and that wall street could rig itself for implosion in 7 short years.
>
> Most people aren't economists and those who are are generally shills and the few who do manage to get their eyes above the murky water for a second are shouted down.
>
> That's why state universities need to eliminate their economics departments altogether.
>

the lets go shopping crowd, are the same people that advised nero. nero had the advisers he wanted. clinton is the same way, its not the advisers that made him do it, its the advisers he wanted. his advisers reflected bills beliefs.
bill types are the enablers. no doubt economic departments are dismal, and have again lost almost all credibility.
i have worked hard to make sure they are viewed for what they are, lets go shopping.

> Let Koch have the field and then everyone can join in and ridicule the field into oblivion.
>

we need to start a page with jokes about economists, like how many does it take to screw in a light bulb, then say lets go shopping.

> > it did not even hang together long enough for him to leave office.
> > the only thing that saved us was 911, and bush saying lets go shopping. that lasted till 2006, now we have been in a depression since then.
> > and every year it gets worse. massive areas in america now, look and act like a third world. its to big to hide any more. and keynes warnings about free trade, are traveling like lightning all over the world.
>
> What do you have to say to the parents of the children massacred at Sandy Hook?

many are most likely getting educated on the economics of lets go shopping.

[wien9al...@gmail.com]

Hitler's followers were fighting Communists and money poured in to help Hitler with that fight in Germany during the 1920s and 1930s. On Friday, March 18, 2016 at 2:18:00 AM UTC-4, Bret Cahill wrote something.

[Bret Cahill]

You make politicians out to be more than what they are. They know very little about economics and even if they did get something right the echo chamber and money of the 0.1% would persuade them otherwise.

No one wants to admit they made trillion dollar mistakes so they double down.

> > If tRUMP gets into office he'll start a nuke war with Russia.

> maybe. i worry more about hillary.

It might not matter. Moving that much money that fast just isn't logistically possible.

The media sneered at Jefferson and Tocqueville for decades as though he no longer mattered and now the bodies are going to stack up.

Keep your eyes open for anything like a war that will get a lot of people killed.

> > > i doubt a slavish shill like clinton, could imagine that about 65,000 factories could move to china in the flash of a eye, and that wall street could rig itself for implosion in 7 short years.
> >
> > Most people aren't economists and those who are are generally shills and the few who do manage to get their eyes above the murky water for a second are shouted down.
> >
> > That's why state universities need to eliminate their economics departments altogether.
> >
>
>
> the lets go shopping crowd, are the same people that advised nero. nero had the advisers he wanted. clinton is the same way, its not the advisers that made him do it, its the advisers he wanted. his advisers reflected bills beliefs.
> bill types are the enablers. no doubt economic departments are dismal, and have again lost almost all credibility.
> i have worked hard to make sure they are viewed for what they are, lets go shopping.
>
>
>
> > Let Koch have the field and then everyone can join in and ridicule the field into oblivion.
> >
>
>
> we need to start a page with jokes about economists, like how many does it take to screw in a light bulb, then say lets go shopping.

Kill two birds with one stone. Incorporate GOP "market" economics absurdities ("starving the beast" with Laffer's "increase in revenue") with satire of the media, ("two vibrant political parties each with it's own vision . . .")

When Sid 9 or Clave see "GOP/legacy media" they might not understand at first but they won't be mad at you either.

When I say never disagree with legacy media Dems take that with some salt. There is more wiggle room than that. At first I was really cautious not to offend a single Dem but there are usually some people to help you out.

> > > it did not even hang together long enough for him to leave office.
> > > the only thing that saved us was 911, and bush saying lets go shopping. that lasted till 2006, now we have been in a depression since then.
> > > and every year it gets worse. massive areas in america now, look and act like a third world. its to big to hide any more. and keynes warnings about free trade, are traveling like lightning all over the world.
> >
> > What do you have to say to the parents of the children massacred at Sandy Hook?
>
> many are most likely getting educated on the economics of lets go shopping.

Supposing Willy Horton raped and murdered your wife?

(I'm practicing on becoming a legacy moderator.)

[nickname unavailable]

i make politicians that are shills as the reason why we are where we are at today. FDR did not understand keynes, keynes even visited the white house, wrote FDR letters, FDR was still confused and did not believe him. so FDR went out and found galbraith.
FDR was called all sorts of names, including jewish/communist/red smears, yet he found a galbraith.
he even had a supreme court like what we have today.
someone who does not believe in a galbraith, will find a rubin/summers type, because that best fits their mentality.

> No one wants to admit they made trillion dollar mistakes so they double down.
>

you misunderstand the clinton wing. like many misunderstand the GOP. they simply do not care. in the end, they believe they are right.
if they believed they made a mistake, hillary in 2007 would not be surrounded by bills people, and the train wreck would have found a galbraith, instead of summers, timmy, rahm, bill daly, feldstein, etc.
the reason why i use the words feverish and slavish, is because they are.

> > > If tRUMP gets into office he'll start a nuke war with Russia.
>
> > maybe. i worry more about hillary.
>
> It might not matter. Moving that much money that fast just isn't logistically possible.
>
> The media sneered at Jefferson and Tocqueville for decades as though he no longer mattered and now the bodies are going to stack up.
>
> Keep your eyes open for anything like a war that will get a lot of people killed.
>

that has already started. in the 1990's bill made a speech, that if you do not become part of the washington concensus, we will bomb you. and the wars have gotten ever nastier, and bloody, till the point where the russians have had enough. ask hillary why she picked victoria nueland to be her right hand. hillary scares me way more than trump.

[Bret Cahill]

Politicians are the tip of the 0.1% iceberg. You will not move the iceberg by hammering away at the tip. Even if you somehow knocked the above water portion off the rest of the iceberg would simply rise out of the water until you had another tip almost as big.

At first glance it seems like I've made the problem is an order of magnitude more daunting with this POV.

"Here I am making this heroic effort and Bret comes along and tells me I have to work 240 hours a day."

The reason I use this analogy is it's actually much easier -- 100X faster/m^3 ice -- to direct a warm current toward the under water portion. In other words, it's much easier getting results exposing the shill media than vilifying the politicians.

Even though it looks like you have 10X more work to do, it's actually 10X faster because now with cheap communication, you have the Gulf Stream available to melt that iceberg.

You can already see the oligarchy cracking. If you want to speed it up this is the way to go.

> FDR did not understand keynes, keynes even visited the white house, wrote FDR letters, FDR was still confused and did not believe him. so FDR went out and found galbraith.
> FDR was called all sorts of names, including jewish/communist/red smears, yet he found a galbraith.
> he even had a supreme court like what we have today.
> someone who does not believe in a galbraith, will find a rubin/summers type, because that best fits their mentality.
>
>
> > No one wants to admit they made trillion dollar mistakes so they double down.
> >
>
> you misunderstand the clinton wing. like many misunderstand the GOP. they simply do not care. in the end, they believe they are right.
> if they believed they made a mistake, hillary in 2007 would not be surrounded by bills people, and the train wreck would have found a galbraith, instead of summers, timmy, rahm, bill daly, feldstein, etc.
> the reason why i use the words feverish and slavish, is because they are.

They have a huge support group. All the kings horses, etc. The biggest nest of shill by far are the 0.1% media. It's a target rich environment.

You could get the results you want without ever mentioning a single politician.

The tip will sink as the under water portion melts away.

[nickname unavailable]

On Friday, March 18, 2016 at 2:19:48 PM UTC-5, Bret Cahill wrote:

your job loss and the loss of your wealth is for the common good, now lets go shopping.

>
> When Sid 9 or Clave see "GOP/legacy media" they might not understand at first but they won't be mad at you either.
>

if the truth hurts, sometimes that becomes a break through.

> When I say never disagree with legacy media Dems take that with some salt. There is more wiggle room than that. At first I was really cautious not to offend a single Dem but there are usually some people to help you out.
>

dean baker calls clinton type democrats, really serious people.

> > > > it did not even hang together long enough for him to leave office.
> > > > the only thing that saved us was 911, and bush saying lets go shopping. that lasted till 2006, now we have been in a depression since then.
> > > > and every year it gets worse. massive areas in america now, look and act like a third world. its to big to hide any more. and keynes warnings about free trade, are traveling like lightning all over the world.
> > >
> > > What do you have to say to the parents of the children massacred at Sandy Hook?
> >
> > many are most likely getting educated on the economics of lets go shopping.
>
> Supposing Willy Horton raped and murdered your wife?
>
> (I'm practicing on becoming a legacy moderator.)

that no longer works with most red state types. it actually seems the rank and file republicans get it, its the hillary supporters who do not.
it seems to me that they might be more dense than a typical red state type. how many times can they be suckered?

[nickname unavailable]

agreed.

> At first glance it seems like I've made the problem is an order of magnitude more daunting with this POV.
>
> "Here I am making this heroic effort and Bret comes along and tells me I have to work 240 hours a day."
>
> The reason I use this analogy is it's actually much easier -- 100X faster/m^3 ice -- to direct a warm current toward the under water portion. In other words, it's much easier getting results exposing the shill media than vilifying the politicians.
>

i do both.

> Even though it looks like you have 10X more work to do, it's actually 10X faster because now with cheap communication, you have the Gulf Stream available to melt that iceberg.
>
> You can already see the oligarchy cracking. If you want to speed it up this is the way to go.
>

in the 1990's i wrote extensively about one of the greatest shills in our lifetime, thomas freidman.

> > FDR did not understand keynes, keynes even visited the white house, wrote FDR letters, FDR was still confused and did not believe him. so FDR went out and found galbraith.
> > FDR was called all sorts of names, including jewish/communist/red smears, yet he found a galbraith.
> > he even had a supreme court like what we have today.
> > someone who does not believe in a galbraith, will find a rubin/summers type, because that best fits their mentality.
> >
> >
> > > No one wants to admit they made trillion dollar mistakes so they double down.
> > >
> >
> > you misunderstand the clinton wing. like many misunderstand the GOP. they simply do not care. in the end, they believe they are right.
> > if they believed they made a mistake, hillary in 2007 would not be surrounded by bills people, and the train wreck would have found a galbraith, instead of summers, timmy, rahm, bill daly, feldstein, etc.
> > the reason why i use the words feverish and slavish, is because they are.
>
> They have a huge support group. All the kings horses, etc. The biggest nest of shill by far are the 0.1% media. It's a target rich environment.
>

agreed.

> You could get the results you want without ever mentioning a single politician.
>

i can get both.

> The tip will sink as the under water portion melts away.
>

it sure will.

[Topaz]

On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:47:11 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
<bretc...@aol.com> wrote:


>
>What do you have to say to the parents of the children massacred at Sandy Hook?
>

Put Sandy Hook hoax in google. There is more than just the Jewish
controlled media now.