Soros pumps $6 million into Hillary campaign...

[Cicero_Venatio]

George Soros, worried about the Bern, has cut a $6 million
check to Hillary in order to take the Bern out. Soros
disagrees vehemently with the Sanders message that the rich
will take care of the poor, as that is the job of the middle
class. Soros wants a continuation of the Obama years with
Hillary, as he has done very well.

[Al Czervik]

On 1/31/2016 11:25 PM, coo...@loon.com wrote:

> Well, thank God soros feels that way, FILEDUD
>
> Because Soros is open to pay more taxes, to amend or modify the shitty
> policies Raygun started, to return to sane domestic economic policies
> that republcans fucked up

Soros is going to get more wealth than you will get in a dozen
lifetimes. So are the Waltons, Koch brothers, Warren Buffet and the
Clintons.

You will be huddled next to your piles of shit in your section 8 hovel
until you die.

Blame yourself.

[Beam Me Up Scotty]

George Soros is an economic Terrorist....

--
That's Karma

[Governor Swill]

We know that's a lie because $6M would be an illegal donation to a
campaign.

Swill
--
Beam Me Up Scotty has been exposed as a
never ending stream of contradictions

[Barky "Tears of a Clown" Hussein]

On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 01:36:45 -0500, Governor Swill
<governo...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:29:29 -0700, Cicero_Venatio wrote:
>
>>George Soros, worried about the Bern, has cut a $6 million
>>check to Hillary in order to take the Bern out. Soros
>>disagrees vehemently with the Sanders message that the rich
>>will take care of the poor, as that is the job of the middle
>>class. Soros wants a continuation of the Obama years with
>>Hillary, as he has done very well.
>
>We know that's a lie because $6M would be an illegal donation to a
>campaign.

Doesn't seem to be much of a problem to Hillary.

[Vandar]

On 2/2/2016 1:36 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:29:29 -0700, Cicero_Venatio wrote:
>
>> George Soros, worried about the Bern, has cut a $6 million
>> check to Hillary in order to take the Bern out. Soros
>> disagrees vehemently with the Sanders message that the rich
>> will take care of the poor, as that is the job of the middle
>> class. Soros wants a continuation of the Obama years with
>> Hillary, as he has done very well.
>
> We know that's a lie because $6M would be an illegal donation to a
> campaign.

He gave it to a Hillary-supporting super-PAC.
http://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/C00495861/1046884/sa/ALL

[Daryl]

Yes, that is legal. Much like 5 billionaires dumped 50+ mil into Cruzes
campaign through the superpacs. Who says you can't buy an election
anymore. But it's getting hard and harder to do. Instead of fixing the
problem, it takes more millions every year to keep buying the elections.
But since the billionaires make billions in return they show a marked
profit.


--
Visit http://droopyvids.com for free TV and Movies. One of
the Largest Collections of Public Domain and Classic TV on
the Internet.

[Governor Swill]

Which was my point. It isn't quite the same as saying he cut a check
to Hillary, is it?

[Vandar]

Not exactly, but it's damn close.

[Ruut66]

Op woensdag 3 februari 2016 00:03:39 UTC+1 schreef Daryl:

> On 2/2/2016 1:20 PM, Vandar wrote:
> > On 2/2/2016 1:36 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
> >> On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:29:29 -0700, Cicero_Venatio wrote:
> >>
> >>> George Soros, worried about the Bern, has cut a $6 million
> >>> check to Hillary in order to take the Bern out. Soros
> >>> disagrees vehemently with the Sanders message that the rich
> >>> will take care of the poor, as that is the job of the middle
> >>> class. Soros wants a continuation of the Obama years with
> >>> Hillary, as he has done very well.
> >>
> >> We know that's a lie because $6M would be an illegal donation to a
> >> campaign.
> >
> > He gave it to a Hillary-supporting super-PAC.
> > http://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/C00495861/1046884/sa/ALL
> >
>
> Yes, that is legal. Much like 5 billionaires dumped 50+ mil into Cruzes
> campaign through the superpacs. Who says you can't buy an election
> anymore. But it's getting hard and harder to do. Instead of fixing the
> problem, it takes more millions every year to keep buying the elections.
> But since the billionaires make billions in return they show a marked
> profit.

At least Soros is up front about contributions.

R

[Governor Swill]

On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 00:22:38 -0800 (PST), Ruut66 wrote:
>At least Soros is up front about contributions.

There is that. I really don't have a problem with "money is free
speech" per se, only with it being anonymous. I figure if somebody's
going to get up on a soapbox and exercise their free speech, they
ought not do it with a bag over their head.

[Governor Swill]

Just to clarify the record, it's been conservatives who were so
supportive of corporate personhood and money as free speech. It's
been cons whining every time some lib complains about the Kochs and
others pumping hundreds of millions into Republican campaigns.

But when it turns out to be a two way street, you don't like it so
much?

[Vandar]

I'm not a conservative and Soros donated as an individual.

[Governor Swill]

So? You're whining about somebody donating lots of money to Clinton's
cause. And at least Soros did it publicly in his own name instead of
anonymously to hide his actions.

I'm just saying I've seen time and time again, folks on all sides of
an issue doing the very things they complain most about everybody else
doing.

"The Kochs are giving money to the Republicans!"
"Soros is giving money to Democrats!"

So what?

[Vandar]

Where am I whining about anything? I merely stated a fact.

[Beam Me Up Scotty]

Koch brothers didn't attack the currencies of so many countries like
Soros has.... George Soros is an *ECONOMIC TERRORIST* while on the
other hand the Koch bothers give some of their Billions to Hospitals.

Soros attacks the currencies and the poor and the Hospitals to make more
money while the Koch's invest in those poor people and the Hospitals.
The two kinds of BILLIONAIRES aren't even close to being equal. George
Soros is as I said, an *ECONOMIC TERRORIST*

--
That's Karma

[Governor Swill]

Ok, not whining exactly. But, in a partisan manner, failing to point
out the other side is doing exactly the same thing. ;)

Swill

>
>> I'm just saying I've seen time and time again, folks on all sides of
>> an issue doing the very things they complain most about everybody else
>> doing.
>>
>> "The Kochs are giving money to the Republicans!"
>> "Soros is giving money to Democrats!"
>>
>> So what?
>>
>> Swill
>>

[Vandar]

They all do it. I'm not complaining about it though. There's no point to
complaining, especially here.
I don't have a problem with corporate donations. DC enacts legislation
that affects corporations, so they should be able to influence who goes
to DC.

[bookoflife.org]

Hillary like George Fagooos who shorted UK Pound and is pure evil.

[Governor Swill]

On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 18:00:37 -0500, Vandar wrote:

>They all do it. I'm not complaining about it though. There's no point to
>complaining, especially here.
>I don't have a problem with corporate donations. DC enacts legislation
>that affects corporations, so they should be able to influence who goes
>to DC.

The only problem I have with campaign finance is it's too complicated.

Anybody ought to be able to donate as much as they'd like to any
candidate or party they want as long as it's done publicly - no more
anonymous contributions.

[Barky "Tears of a Clown" Hussein]

On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:15:12 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty
<Alinskyite-Liberals-attack-the-messenger-w...@blackhole.nebulax.com>
wrote:

And David Koch supports PBS, which drives the moonbats moonbatty-er.

https://pando.com/2014/03/03/more-pbs-conflict-woes-as-activists-move-to-eject-david-koch-from-board-of-nova-station/

[First Post]

On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 09:02:52 -0700, koo...@maricaibo.com AKA
Scu...@belvue.net AKA Nowu...@wormy.com AKA
Fl...@limballs.com AKA Clar...@twit.com AKA coo...@loon.com AKA
Yoor...@Jurgis.net AKA Ro...@Bellview.net AKA Sn...@smack.com AKA
dav...@agent.com AKA Billf...@LTP.net AKA Sl...@Jim.net AKA
Scr...@Winger.net AKA Ro...@Bellview.net AKA bcb...@sasasas.com AKA
s.f.@wellcom.net AKA L...@Sig.net AKA Ku...@Click.com AKA sp...@reo.net
AKA Gar...@M1.net, Liar, forger and troll better known as Gary
Rozelles wrote:

The stupid piece of South Dakota white trash can't debate so they just
try to distract and disrupt like a small spoiled child. Typical
democrat loser in life.

[Governor Swill]

Lol! I've noticed that. Nova no less, one of my favorite TV shows.

Either he really doesn't believe the stuff he's selling about climate
change and science (via conservative political donations) or he's
trying to convince libs that he really doesn't believe the stuff he's
selling.

[Governor Swill]

On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 09:02:52 -0700, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:

>On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 03:32:03 -0500, Governor Swill wrote:
>>On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 18:00:37 -0500, Vandar wrote:
>>>They all do it. I'm not complaining about it though. There's no point to
>>>complaining, especially here.
>>>I don't have a problem with corporate donations. DC enacts legislation
>>>that affects corporations, so they should be able to influence who goes
>>>to DC.
>>The only problem I have with campaign finance is it's too complicated.
>>Anybody ought to be able to donate as much as they'd like to any
>>candidate or party they want as long as it's done publicly - no more
>>anonymous contributions.

>SO---you advocate the rich having more power?

My opinion is based on Citizens United which SCOTUS decision I don't
agree with. Tough shit, it's the law of the land now. So, while I
don't agree that money is free speech or that contributions can be
anonymous, between the two, I disagree more with the anonymity than
with the limitless spending.

>When the Kooky Brothers openly say they'll spend nearly a
>billion---isn't that transparent enough?

Please cite the Kochs announcing a billion in contributions to any
political campaign.

[Barky "Tears of a Clown" Hussein]

On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 09:02:52 -0700, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:

>On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 03:32:03 -0500, Governor Swill

><governo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 18:00:37 -0500, Vandar wrote:
>>
>>>They all do it. I'm not complaining about it though. There's no point to
>>>complaining, especially here.
>>>I don't have a problem with corporate donations. DC enacts legislation
>>>that affects corporations, so they should be able to influence who goes
>>>to DC.
>>
>>The only problem I have with campaign finance is it's too complicated.
>>
>>Anybody ought to be able to donate as much as they'd like to any
>>candidate or party they want as long as it's done publicly - no more
>>anonymous contributions.
>>
>>Swill
>

>SO---you advocate the rich having more power?

Why not?

>When the Kooky Brothers openly say they'll spend nearly a
>billion---isn't that transparent enough?

SO---you are so brain-fried you vote for the candidate with the most
commercials? Soros could give me the whole $6 million and I still
wouldn't vote for Shrillary.

[Barky "Tears of a Clown" Hussein]

On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 20:42:21 -0500, Governor Swill
<governo...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 09:02:52 -0700, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:
>>On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 03:32:03 -0500, Governor Swill wrote:
>>>On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 18:00:37 -0500, Vandar wrote:
>>>>They all do it. I'm not complaining about it though. There's no point to
>>>>complaining, especially here.
>>>>I don't have a problem with corporate donations. DC enacts legislation
>>>>that affects corporations, so they should be able to influence who goes
>>>>to DC.
>>>The only problem I have with campaign finance is it's too complicated.
>>>Anybody ought to be able to donate as much as they'd like to any
>>>candidate or party they want as long as it's done publicly - no more
>>>anonymous contributions.
>
>>SO---you advocate the rich having more power?
>
>My opinion is based on Citizens United which SCOTUS decision I don't
>agree with. Tough shit, it's the law of the land now. So, while I
>don't agree that money is free speech or that contributions can be
>anonymous, between the two, I disagree more with the anonymity than
>with the limitless spending.

Nothing drives me away from a product faster than too much
advertising.

[Cicero_Venatio]

> What debate?
>
> You're nothing but a lower form of Pajamaturd and Dana---mixed in with
> with a few turds of republican portapotty's, ya dumb fuck
>
> The ONLY thing you deserve---is to be RIDICULED for the bullshit,
> silly, childish crap you "think" is "debate"
>
> Ya got nothing, FirstTwerp
------------
I see a lot of pain in that response. Reach out...for help.

[Barky "Tears of a Clown" Hussein]

You are a Godly man, CV.

[Barky "Tears of a Clown" Hussein]

On Sat, 06 Feb 2016 18:45:12 -0700, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:

>On Sat, 06 Feb 2016 16:10:24 -0700, Cicero_Venatio
><jazz...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>

>Naw---I'll just shit and flush---it'll float by ya in a week or so
>
>That okay?

South Dakota drains into the Sea of Cortez...? You should probably
drop your geography teacher from your Christmas card list.

Or do you carry it by hand to the continental divide?

[Governor Swill]

I'm sure he uses his "Dukakis '88" mug.

Swill
--
Hillary can't campaign. In 2008, she lost to a black guy
with a muslim name. Now she's losing to a 74 year old
Jewish Socialist. Hillary, we're making this as easy as
we can, but you have to help a little - Bill Mahr