List of Initiates: Their Rays and Stage of Evolution
kayl...@my-deja.com
LIST OF INITIATES
Their Rays and Stage of Evolution
The figures in brackets refer to the initiate’s exact point of
development attained during that life. The initiatory degree has been
omitted in the case of Avatars. Five figures follow the brackets; the
rays relate to the soul, personality, mental apparatus, astral vehicle
and physical body. Also listed are the dates of birth and death, and the
field of endeavour in which the initiate became known. However, the
limits of space available left no option. In a few cases, unfortunately,
it was impossible to find all the relevant data; such omissions are
denoted by a question mark. [Note: This list includes names which have
appeared in Share International magazine from January 1982 through
December 1996. See Maitreya’s Mission, Vol. III for a list containing
additional names through March 1997, as well as sub-rays and
nationalities of many of the names given below.]
Aalto, Alvar (1.6) 2-4-7-6-3 (1898-1976) Architect
Adamov, Arthur (1.6) 2-3-5-6-3 (1908-1970) Dramatist
Adenauer, Konrad (1.7) 1-3-1-6-3 (1876-1967) Statesman
Adler, Alfred (2.0) 2-1-1-2-7 (1870-1937) Psychiatrist
Adler, Jankel (2.0) 2-4-1-6-3 (1895-1949) Painter
Aeschylus (1.7) 4-1-3-4-7 (525-456 BC) Dramatist
Agrippa, H. Cornelius (1.58) 3-4-6-6-7 (1486-1535) Theologian
Aivanhov, Mikhail (2.4) 3-6-6-2-7 (1900-1986) Founder Fraternité Blanche
Akbar the Great (1.45) 1-1-3-6-3 (1542-1605) Emperor
Akhnaton (1.5) 2-6-1-6-7 (1372-1354 BC) King
Alder, Vera Stanley (1.65) 2-4-3-4-3- (d. 1984) English esotericist
Alexander, Rolf (1.8) 2-3-4-6-3 (b. 1891) Author
Alexander the Great (1.5) 1-1-3-6-1 (356-323 BC) King
Alfred the Great (1.3) 4-7-3-6-7 (849-ca.900) English king
Allison, Audlee (1.3) 2-4-3-4-3 (d. 1988) Mystic, writer
Ambartsumian, Victor (1.7) 4-4-3-4-3 (1908-1996)Armenian astrophysicist)
Ananda Mayee Ma 2-2-6-4-3 (1896-1982) Cosmic avatar
Anderson, Hans C (1.6) 6-4-2-6-7 (1805-1875) Author
Anderson, Lindsay (1.5) 2-4-3-4-7 (1922-1994) British film director
Angelico, Fra (2.5) 6-4-6-2-7 (1387-1455) Painter
Apelles (1.6) 2-4-4-6-3 (ca. 325 BC) Painter
Apollinaire, Guillaume (1.6) 2-3-4-6-7 (1880-1918) Poet
Apollonius of Tyana (5.0) 6-1-1-2-7 (16-ca. 97 AD) Philosopher
Aquinas, Thomas (2.0) 6-6-7-2-3 (1225-1274) Theologian
Archimedes (2.2) 5-2-1-2-1 (ca. 287-212 BC) Mathematician
Aristophanes (1.6) 2-4-1-4-7 (448-385 BC) Comic dramatist
Aristotle (2.4) 7-5-1-6-3 (384-322 BC) Philosopher
Arkwright, Sir Richard (1.6) 2-1-5-4-5 (1732-1792) Inventor
Armstrong, Louis (0.6) 4-4-7-6-3 (1900-1971) Jazz musician
Arnold, Matthew (2.2) 2-4-6-4-3 (1822-1888) Poet
Aron, Raymond (2.0) 3-7-6-6-3 (1905-1983) Historian/sociologist
Artaud, Antonin (1.6) 3-4-4-6-3 (1896-1948) Dramatist
Asimov, Isaac (1.6) 3-4-7-4-3 (1920-1992) Writer
Asoka (3.0) 2-4-1-4-3 (264-223 BC) Emperor
Assagioli, Roberto (2.0) 2-2-3-6-3 (1888-1974) Psychiatrist
Atatürk, Mustafa Kemal (2.2) 1-1-5-2-7 (1881-1938) Statesman
Auger, Arleen (1.3) 2-4-3-6-3 (1939-1993) Singer
Augustine (2.3) 6-6-1-4-7 (354-430) Theologian
Augustus (1.75) 1-1-6-6-1 (63-14 BC) Emperor
The above is an excerpt from first page only- see MMVIII, by BC for the
whole list.
More information:
Information about the 7 rays
Articles from SI:
http://www.shareintl.org/archives/AgelessWisdom/i_7rays.htm
Book:
Esoteric Psychology I by AAB/DK:
http://www.netnews.org/bk/psychology1/toc.html
-------------------------------------------------
Info about Initiation:
Articles from SI:
http://www.shareintl.org/archives/AgelessWisdom/i_initiation.htm
Book:
Initiation, Human and Solar by AAB/DK:
http://www.netnews.org/bk/initiation/toc.html
x
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Allen Crider
<kayl...@my-deja.com> wrote in message news:8phln6$4hi$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
> This might be of interest to some:
>
>
> LIST OF INITIATES
> Their Rays and Stage of Evolution
>
cook1e
wasn't he convicted of child molesting some 8 or so years ago?
cook1e
kayl...@my-deja.com wrote in message <8phln6$4hi$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
kayl...@my-deja.com
"cook1e" wrote:
> You'd be pusing it to convince me that Isaac Asimov belongs on that
> list ...wasn't he convicted of child molesting some 8 or so years ago?
> cook1e
I have no desire to convince anyone of anything. If one really wants to
begin to understand the complex and mysterious science of human
evolution, some reading and thought is required (links provided in the
initial post are recommended). It's easy to understand where you're
coming from, but it is also easy to see that you haven't read and
thought very much on the topic.
Initiates are rarely known for their mistakes. Mostly they are known for
their contributions. It is common for people to wonder about their own
PoE. Many people read a little and then over-rate themselves ie: fondly
imagining that they are 2 or 3 (or higher!) on the 1 to 5 scale.
Studying the list reveals that most people beyond 1.4 or so were very
gifted. Many of them were idolized by their fans. Those who fondly
imagine that they are at or beyond 1.5 would be helped to ask themselves
if their gifts to the world are on par with that of others listed with
the same or similar PoEs.
In other words having this information can help with the deglamorization
process.
Here are a few that were under 2.O
Marcus Aurelius 1.4
Foster Bailey 1.8
Alexander Graham Bell 1.75
Steve Biko 1.4
Caligula 1.2
Edgar Cayce 1.7
Miguel Cervantes 1.7
Charles Chaplin 1.6
Cicero 1.7
Bing Crosby 1.4
Salvador Dali 1.6
Thomas Edision 1.7
Duke Ellington 0.6
Federico Fellini 1.6
Ernest Hemingway 1.6
Jimi Hendrix 1.3
Henry VIII 1.6
Jimmy Hoffa 1.2
Franz Kafka 1.7
Jack Kerouac 1.35
John Lennon 1.6
Bob Marley 1.36
Malcom X 1.4
Claude Monet 1.9
George Patton 1.7
Elvis Presley 0.8
Hope that this is useful to someone.
As usual, some dogs must and will bark. To them, I turn a deaf ear.
;-)
.
cook1e
kayl...@my-deja.com wrote in message <8pj0io$lcd$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
>
>
> "cook1e" wrote:
>> You'd be pusing it to convince me that Isaac Asimov belongs on that
>> list ...wasn't he convicted of child molesting some 8 or so years ago?
>> cook1e
>
>I have no desire to convince anyone of anything.
Thank you. After spending some time trying to find my way around the web
site, could you please post the link for the full list, as I wasn't able to
find it.
If one really wants to
>begin to understand the complex and mysterious science of human
>evolution, some reading and thought is required (links provided in the
>initial post are recommended). It's easy to understand where you're
>coming from, but it is also easy to see that you haven't read and
>thought very much on the topic.
On the contrary, I have thought a lot. Someone who vibrates to a higher
energy is not likely to indulge in activities of a lower nature,
surely.
>
>Initiates are rarely known for their mistakes. Mostly they are known for
>their contributions. It is common for people to wonder about their own
>PoE. Many people read a little and then over-rate themselves ie: fondly
>imagining that they are 2 or 3 (or higher!) on the 1 to 5 scale.
>Studying the list reveals that most people beyond 1.4 or so were very
>gifted. Many of them were idolized by their fans. Those who fondly
>imagine that they are at or beyond 1.5 would be helped to ask themselves
>if their gifts to the world are on par with that of others listed with
>the same or similar PoEs.
Why are you so defensive, I'm not attacking you, that's not my intention,
I'm just here to learn like the rest.
>
>In other words having this information can help with the deglamorization
>process.
>
Please provide the link for the full list, and also where did this
information come from - no, I'm not attacking or doubting you here
either, I always check my sources, for me that's a part of my learning
Your interpretation of my comments is defensive and inocrrect.
Allen Crider
<kayl...@my-deja.com> wrote in message news:8pj0io$lcd$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
>
>
> "cook1e" wrote:
> > You'd be pusing it to convince me that Isaac Asimov belongs on that
> > list ...wasn't he convicted of child molesting some 8 or so years ago?
> > cook1e
>
> I have no desire to convince anyone of anything.
That's right. You just SPAM for money.
kayl...@my-deja.com
<snip>
> Please provide the link for the full list, and also where did this
> information come from - no, I'm not attacking or doubting you here
> either, I always check my sources, for me that's a part of my learning
> process.
<snip>
kayla191 wrote:
> >As usual, some dogs must and will bark. To them, I turn a deaf ear.
>
> Your interpretation of my comments is defensive and inocrrect.
Apparently you incorrectly assumed that the barking dogs comment was
directed towards you. It was not! I don't know what made you think that,
because i did not turn a deaf ear to you. Also, I don't know what made
you think i was being defensive, nor does it concern me. It's off-topic
anyway.
Here are the links from the first post:
More information:
Information about the 7 rays
Articles from SI:
http://www.shareintl.org/archives/AgelessWisdom/i_7rays.htm
Book:
Esoteric Psychology I by AAB/DK:
http://www.netnews.org/bk/psychology1/toc.html
-------------------------------------------------
Info about Initiation:
Articles from SI:
http://www.shareintl.org/archives/AgelessWisdom/i_initiation.htm Book:
Initiation, Human and Solar by AAB/DK:
http://www.netnews.org/bk/initiation/toc.html
Sorry for the misunderstanding.
:-)
kayl...@my-deja.com
<snip>
> Please provide the link for the full list, and also where did this
> information come from - no, I'm not attacking or doubting you here
> either, I always check my sources, for me that's a part of my learning
> process.
<snip>
kayla191 wrote:
> >As usual, some dogs must and will bark. To them, I turn a deaf ear.
>
> Your interpretation of my comments is defensive and inocrrect.
Apparently you incorrectly assumed that the barking dogs comment was
directed towards you. It was not! I don't know what made you think that,
because i did not turn a deaf ear to you. Also, I don't know what made
you think i was being defensive, nor does it concern me. It's off-topic
anyway.
Here are the links from the first post:
More information:
Information about the 7 rays
Articles from SI:
http://www.shareintl.org/archives/AgelessWisdom/i_7rays.htm
Book:
Esoteric Psychology I by AAB/DK:
http://www.netnews.org/bk/psychology1/toc.html
-------------------------------------------------
Info about Initiation:
Articles from SI:
http://www.shareintl.org/archives/AgelessWisdom/i_initiation.htm Book:
Initiation, Human and Solar by AAB/DK:
http://www.netnews.org/bk/initiation/toc.html
Sorry for the misunderstanding.
:-)
Allen Crider
<kayl...@my-deja.com> wrote in message news:8pk4p4$232$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
> "cook1e" <coo...@NOSPAM.ihug.co.nz wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > Please provide the link for the full list, and also where did this
> > information come from - no, I'm not attacking or doubting you here
> > either, I always check my sources, for me that's a part of my learning
> > process.
>
> <snip>
>
> kayla191 wrote:
>
> > >As usual, some dogs must and will bark. To them, I turn a deaf ear.
> >
> > Your interpretation of my comments is defensive and inocrrect.
>
>
> Apparently you incorrectly assumed that the barking dogs comment was
> directed towards you. It was not!
Who, then was it directed at? The Maitreya?
> I don't know what made you think that,
> because i did not turn a deaf ear to you. Also, I don't know what made
> you think i was being defensive, nor does it concern me. It's off-topic
> anyway.
Dotty, your Creme cult nonsense is off topic.
cook1e
kayl...@my-deja.com wrote in message <8pk4p4$232$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
> "cook1e" <coo...@NOSPAM.ihug.co.nz wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>> Please provide the link for the full list, and also where did this
>> information come from - no, I'm not attacking or doubting you here
>> either, I always check my sources, for me that's a part of my learning
>> process.
>
><snip>
>
>kayla191 wrote:
>
>> >As usual, some dogs must and will bark. To them, I turn a deaf ear.
>>
>> Your interpretation of my comments is defensive and inocrrect.
>
>
>Apparently you incorrectly assumed that the barking dogs comment was
>directed towards you. It was not!
It was posted in response to an email I sent.
I don't know what made you think that,
>because i did not turn a deaf ear to you. Also, I don't know what made
>you think i was being defensive, nor does it concern me.
You do *sound* defensive and angry, perhaps I'm wrong, but that's how you
come across. Isn't it rather misleading to post the likes of your message
to a ** discussion ** group and not follow it up with discussion. I'm
supposed to purchase a copy of Maitreya's Mission Volume III, by Benjamin
Creme to find out more............................ Now that's off topic.
Kind of kills discussion in the group really, doesn't it, which is a pity
because there are few people in everyday life with the same understanding of
things as we here, and the group should be used as a tool to discuss, not
push your wares if someone wants to know more.
Allen Crider
<kayl...@my-deja.com> wrote in message news:8qugh0$7ni$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
>
>
> In article <8pmp9j$d72$1...@news.ihug.co.nz>,
> "cook1e" <coo...@NOSPAM.ihug.co.nz (remove the obvious)> wrote:
> >
> <snip>
>
> >Isn't it rather misleading to post the likes of your message
> > to a ** discussion ** group and not follow it up with discussion. I'm
> > supposed to purchase a copy of Maitreya's Mission Volume III, by
> > Benjamin Creme to find out more............................ Now
> > that's off topic.
> > Kind of kills discussion in the group really, doesn't it, which is a
> > pity because there are few people in everyday life with the same
> > understanding of things as we here, and the group should be used as a
> > tool to discuss, not push your wares if someone wants to know more.
>
>
> If that's the way you see it, then that is true for you. Maybe if you
> look at the thread for this discussion on deja.com, you'll be able to
> see it from a different angle, and note that i have replied, that i did
> not post and then disappear.
>
> http://www.deja.com/topics_if.xp?search=topic&group=alt.metaphysics.a-a-
> bailey
>
> I was not pushing any wares, I did leave some links below to hundreds of
> freely accessable online pages, including one to the following book:
You're pushing your Share International cult. SPAMming to non SHare
newsgroups. Pushing your wares, selling your path like it was a commodity.
>
> > > Initiation, Human and Solar by AAB/DK:
> > > http://www.netnews.org/bk/initiation/toc.html
>
> and several articles (plus another book) which can also be read online
> for free.
>
>
[snip]
kayl...@my-deja.com
In article <8pmp9j$d72$1...@news.ihug.co.nz>,
"cook1e" <coo...@NOSPAM.ihug.co.nz (remove the obvious)> wrote:
>
<snip>
>Isn't it rather misleading to post the likes of your message
> to a ** discussion ** group and not follow it up with discussion. I'm
> supposed to purchase a copy of Maitreya's Mission Volume III, by
> Benjamin Creme to find out more............................ Now
> that's off topic.
> Kind of kills discussion in the group really, doesn't it, which is a
> pity because there are few people in everyday life with the same
> understanding of things as we here, and the group should be used as a
> tool to discuss, not push your wares if someone wants to know more.
<snip>
If that's the way you see it, then that is true for you. Maybe if you
look at the thread for this discussion on deja.com, you'll be able to
see it from a different angle, and note that i have replied, that i did
not post and then disappear.
http://www.deja.com/topics_if.xp?search=topic&group=alt.metaphysics.a-a-
bailey
I was not pushing any wares, I did leave some links below to hundreds of
freely accessable online pages, including one to the following book:
> > Initiation, Human and Solar by AAB/DK:
> > http://www.netnews.org/bk/initiation/toc.html
and several articles (plus another book) which can also be read online
for free.
> > More information:
> >
> > Information about the 7 rays
> > Articles from SI:
> > http://www.shareintl.org/archives/AgelessWisdom/i_7rays.htm
> > Book:
> > Esoteric Psychology I by AAB/DK:
> > http://www.netnews.org/bk/psychology1/toc.html
> > -------------------------------------------------
> > Info about Initiation:
> > Articles from SI:
> > http://www.shareintl.org/archives/AgelessWisdom/i_initiation.htm
>>Book:
> > Initiation, Human and Solar by AAB/DK:
> > http://www.netnews.org/bk/initiation/toc.html
<snip>
<><><>
"The religious path, as seen by the Masters, is only one of many paths
to the demonstration of our innate divinity. God does not reside in the
religion, although the religion might help you to realize that divinity.
Every aspect of life --politics, economics, religion, art, culture,
science, education --can be lived in such a way that what we call God
can be known and expressed." (Benjamin Creme)
"Mention that we are praying, many of the medicine people, the spiritual
leaders, the elders, are praying for the world," says Joseph Chasing
Horse. "We are praying that mankind does wake up and think about the
future, for we haven't just inherited this earth from our ancestors, but
we are borrowing it from our unborn children."
"Love all with the love you give to your parents, children, and other
dear ones. That all-inclusive love is the most wonderful consciousness."
Paramahansa Yogananda
===================================
Help the Hungry:
http://www.stopthehunger.com
http://www.thehungersite.com
Help the environment
http://www.saverainforest.net/
http://rainforest.care2.com/