Yet, you indicted those "others" who voiced THEIR opinions to
the contrary of the OP -- labeling them A-holes in the process.
If you (and the OP) are entitled to an opinion, then surely *they*
are, as well!?
[And, if you read -- carefully -- what I wrote, I didn't explicitly
include nor exclude myself from that grouping]
I've never understood the whining that people engage in re: this
sort of issue. If you don't like what is being said, THEN DON'T READ
IT! Instead, the push is to CENSOR other folks' speech.
It doesn't take much effort to sort out the posts you can safely ignore
(because the individuals engage in discourse that you find unappealing).
If you don't want to be exposed to "sin", live in a monastery (I guess
novitiates fondling each other isn't considered "sin" :> ).
Personally, I have software that examines message content and just elides
messages that it "knows" I don't want to bother reading. It also
"learns" which posts (individuals) I "avoid" and, over time, filters
those out so I'm not inconvenienced by their presence. I.e., *it*
does the "remembering" *for* me!
But, for a group with this little traffic, you should be able to mentally
track who to read and who to pass by...