On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 11:42:20 AM UTC-4, Bod wrote:
> Wait a second. Weren’t we told all would be OK with Donald Trump in the
> Oval Office because there’d be enough grown-ups around him to keep him
> in check? On taking the oath he had the cream of the crop of Republican
> policy experts in Washington DC to choose from. Academics and wonks
> aching to come out of eight years of Obama-induced hibernation.
That isn't true. There were a whole lot of very qualified people, people
with experience, who would have nothing to do with Trump. That started
with his campaign and it's one reason why instead of real qualified people
on foreign policy, he would up with Flynn, Carter Page, and George the
Greek. Look where that got him.
The notion that people around Trump could keep him under control was
a stupid concept. It was obvious on the campaign trail what he would
be like. People said, he'll stop the stupid antics, he'll be
presidential after the primary, it's just a show. Then they said he'd
straighten out after the election. Then they said he'd straighten out
after he took office. He's actually gotten worse. And sadly the same
people are actually ENCOURAGING his god awful behavior and stupidity.
>
> Even at the start, it didn’t work out quite that way. Trump was elected
> in part because he had made “expert” a derogatory term. Likewise
> “establishment”, to which almost all the more obvious candidates for
> positions in his West Wing clearly belonged. On top of that, he had
> stamped his feet and ruled out hiring anyone who had not been supportive
> of him during the campaign.
Yep, that's it. He thinks experience and knowledge are bad things,
better to get some morons like Carter Page, George the Greek, Bannon,
Miller and Kushner. And a whole lot of the experienced people will
not sign on to this shit show to be humiliated, embarrassed, held
responsible for it. After seeing how he's treated Sessions and
Tillerson, seeing the chaos, the revolving door, why would anyone
qualified get involved?