Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Anyone watch Holmes on Homes??

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Ken

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 10:38:25 AM8/26/10
to
The prior message made want to ask the question. I get the program on
HGTV, but it might be on other channels as well. I think it is a great
program with not only shocking examples of work being done, but some
interesting techniques and material for accomplishing tasks. Check it out.

RicodJour

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 10:46:25 AM8/26/10
to

The guy's heart is in the right place, but he's no Tommy Silva. His
construction experience on display has some deficiencies. Makes good
watching, though.

R

LSMFT

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 1:05:45 PM8/26/10
to

They got some real shoddy contractors in Canada it seems.

--
LSMFT

I look outside this morning and everything was in 3D!

DerbyDad03

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 1:20:19 PM8/26/10
to
On Aug 26, 10:38 am, Ken <K...@invalid.com> wrote:

SWMBO loves it, so I DVR it and we watch it together sometimes.

My pet peeve - which is the same with many other DIY shows - is how
they repeat much of what you've already seen when they come back from
a commercial.

Do they think we're idiots and can't remember why they're fixing the
house? H on H isn't as bad as some of the other shows, but the re-
caps are still unnecessary.

Who pays for the high-end upgrades? They take a couple who just got
ripped off for $50K on a bathroom remodel and build them a custom bath
that is far above what they were going for in the first place. Do the
sponsors cover the full cost?

"Take it down...take it all down."

Smitty Two

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 1:42:26 PM8/26/10
to
In article
<5d8fbc75-ea8d-4580...@k10g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
DerbyDad03 <teama...@eznet.net> wrote:

> My pet peeve - which is the same with many other DIY shows - is how
> they repeat much of what you've already seen when they come back from
> a commercial.

It's not just DIY shows. A lot of Discovery, Learning, and History
channel shows are like that. It's a way of stretching 10 minutes of
information into an hour show.

chaniarts

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 1:46:24 PM8/26/10
to

they also need to hook in channels surfers who may be scanning around during
commercials.


DerbyDad03

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 1:52:33 PM8/26/10
to
On Aug 26, 1:46 pm, "chaniarts" <chania...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Smitty Two wrote:
> > In article
> > <5d8fbc75-ea8d-4580-8d8f-7c3d1eee4...@k10g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,

> > DerbyDad03 <teamarr...@eznet.net> wrote:
>
> >> My pet peeve - which is the same with many other DIY shows - is how
> >> they repeat much of what you've already seen when they come back from
> >> a commercial.
>
> > It's not just DIY shows. A lot of Discovery, Learning, and History
> > channel shows are like that. It's a way of stretching 10 minutes of
> > information into an hour show.
>
> they also need to hook in channels surfers who may be scanning around during
> commercials.

That only works if a surfer hits their station just as their
commercial ends so that they catch the re-cap. If I'm surfing during a
commercial, I don't stay on another channel that is running a
commercial and wait for it to end. If I wanted to watch a commercial,
I'd have stayed on the channel I was originally watching.

What are the odds that a surfer is actually going to catch the re-cap
just as it is beginning?

DGDevin

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 1:54:12 PM8/26/10
to
"Smitty Two" <prest...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:prestwhich-60E7C...@news.eternal-september.org...

Yup, and if you watch enough History Channel you'll see the same photos and
film footage and animations used over and over, including when their use is
flat-out wrong. "When the German army invaded France in 1940...."--umm,
yeah, they apparently were equipped with Russki T-34 tanks, how surprising.

DGDevin

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 1:58:04 PM8/26/10
to
"RicodJour" <rico...@worldemail.com> wrote in message
news:6b4761b6-6c08-4864...@k10g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...

I'd like to see follow-up shows where they identify the contractor
responsible for the shoddy or fraudulent work and take him to court. Too
many such sleazeballs count on people not wanting to spend the money to go
after them, and since many folks don't research before hiring there is
always another sucker to be ripped off. Those clowns deserve some bad
publicity.

Jim Elbrecht

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 1:59:32 PM8/26/10
to
"chaniarts" <chan...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Add NatGeo to the list of offenders.

I think that probably *is* it-- But the cost, if they haven't figured
it out yet, is that folks like me won't ever come back to watch a 20
minute [1/2 hour] show stretched out over an hour. I *might* DVR
one and ff through the crap- but that doesn't help their sponsors
much.

Jim

Steve Barker

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 2:54:55 PM8/26/10
to

well i think the biggest mistake people make is giving ANY money up
front. There was a news article just a couple nights ago here in KC
about some dum bastard who paid a roofer multiple thousand up front.
When are people gonna learn? I pay NOTHING up front. (on the rare
occasion i can't do something myself)

--
Steve Barker
remove the "not" from my address to email

RicodJour

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 3:06:52 PM8/26/10
to
On Aug 26, 2:54 pm, Steve Barker <ichasetra...@notgmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/26/2010 12:58 PM, DGDevin wrote:
> > "RicodJour" <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote in message

> >> On Aug 26, 10:38 am, Ken <K...@invalid.com> wrote:
>
> >>> The prior message made want to ask the question. I get the program on
> >>> HGTV, but it might be on other channels as well. I think it is a great
> >>> program with not only shocking examples of work being done, but some
> >>> interesting techniques and material for accomplishing tasks. Check it
> >>> out.
>
> >> The guy's heart is in the right place, but he's no Tommy Silva. His
> >> construction experience on display has some deficiencies. Makes good
> >> watching, though.
>
>
> > I'd like to see follow-up shows where they identify the contractor
> > responsible for the shoddy or fraudulent work and take him to court. Too
> > many such sleazeballs count on people not wanting to spend the money to
> > go after them, and since many folks don't research before hiring there
> > is always another sucker to be ripped off. Those clowns deserve some bad
> > publicity.

That's an interesting idea. Very. Instead of flapping your
gums...errr, fingers...here, go sell the idea to a DIY network before
someone else does!

> well i think the biggest mistake people make is giving ANY money up
> front. There was a news article just a couple nights ago here in KC
> about some dum bastard who paid a roofer multiple thousand up front.
> When are people gonna learn?  I pay NOTHING up front.  (on the rare
> occasion i can't do something myself)

Is it simply that you don't like to part with the money any sooner
than you have to?
Do you take it as a shady practice when a contractor asks for money up
front?
Or is it that you're worried that you'll lose leverage, or the
contractor may skip, if you pay some money up front?

R

Steve Barker

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 3:18:18 PM8/26/10
to

It is my opinion that any reputable contractor shouldn't need my money
up front. I would hope he's liquid enough or has good enough credit to
get my materials out of the supplier(s) without having to pay for them
HIMSELF up front. I have a very reputable HVAC man i use, and even the
very first time we met, he didn't want but a third and that was only
after he had the equipment on my property. Since then, he's not asked
for a dime (seven more major jobs) until he was finished.

So yes, to answer your questions:

No i don't want to part with my money any sooner than necessary
Yes, i take it as shady if they ask for money up front
And yes, you lose ALL your leverage if you don't owe them money. And
yes, they skip all the time when paid. Fencers and roofers are the worst.

DerbyDad03

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 3:23:56 PM8/26/10
to
On Aug 26, 1:58 pm, "DGDevin" <DGDe...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> "RicodJour" <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote in message

H on H did *one* show - the only one I ever saw them do it on - where
they went after the contractor.

They blurred out the name on the window of his office, but they had
the guy on camera, asking him when he was going to pay the cabinet
maker so that cabinets could be released to the home owners.

They also mentioned afterwards that the authorities had filed charges
because other people who had been ripped off by the same guy came
forward after the show was aired.

I think the hardest part is actually proving liability in a timely
manner. Some of these cases take years to prosecute and you have to
prove willful wrongdoing for it to be illegal. As far as I know,
shoddy workmanship is nothing more a civil matter. Many of the H on H
shows are just that: shoddy workmanship and jobs not finished - but
not necessarily paid for either.

The kitchen show I mentioned above involved taking the client's money
but not paying the subs or suppliers. At that point, I believe we
enter the realm of legal, not just civil, action.

I'm not a lawyer...not did I stay at a Holiday Inn last night.

Cindy Hamilton

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 3:26:25 PM8/26/10
to
On Aug 26, 1:58 pm, "DGDevin" <DGDe...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> "RicodJour" <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote in message

My husband has a fantasy of a companion show called "Mike's Friends",
in which various members of the building trades show the shoddy
contractor
new and interesting ways to employ common tools such as pipe wrenches
and pneumatic nailers.

Cindy Hamilton

DerbyDad03

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 3:26:55 PM8/26/10
to
> remove the "not" from my address to email- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

re: "... they skip all the time when paid. Fencers and roofers are the
worst"

Fences are one thing, but skipping off of a roof is just plain dumb.

cl...@snyder.on.ca

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 5:00:30 PM8/26/10
to
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:05:45 -0400, LSMFT <bol...@aol.com> wrote:

>Ken wrote:
>> The prior message made want to ask the question. I get the program on
>> HGTV, but it might be on other channels as well. I think it is a great
>> program with not only shocking examples of work being done, but some
>> interesting techniques and material for accomplishing tasks. Check it out.
>
>They got some real shoddy contractors in Canada it seems.

Some even worse in the USA. And Mike only televises the WORST he
finds.

cl...@snyder.on.ca

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 5:03:32 PM8/26/10
to

Paying the equivalent of the contractor's cost for custom ordered
parts like windows and doors is normal, and expected.

cl...@snyder.on.ca

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 5:05:42 PM8/26/10
to

If the contractor doesn't know YOU from Adam and he needs to custom
order things like windows or doors that may not fit another job for
the next two years, a deposit in good faith for those items is
customary, and fair.

RicodJour

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 5:16:34 PM8/26/10
to

Agreed with the first - sound financial practice.

Can't agree with the second. In fact, in some areas of the country,
like mine, you're not supposed to mix money from different projects.
They're supposed to be in separate accounts. You're not allowed to
spend money from one project "just to tide you over" on another
project. I'm sure you can see the logic behind that - to protect the
homeowner from a contractor throwing the homeowner's money down
another homeowner's hole and not getting their own project completed
when the contractor goes belly up.

As much as the first one is sound financial practice, the second is
poor financial practice for the contractor. Costs are incurred from
the moment work starts on the project. Any time spent on the project
after the contract is signed is an expenditure for the contractor.

The funny thing is that a contractor with good business practices -
ones like not skipping out on the job, not going bankrupt, keeping
their books in order, and not extending no-interest loans - are the
practices that would keep such a contractor from working for you. It
seems like you're shooting yourself in the foot, but the real story is
you don't hire people because you do most of the work yourself.
That's fine, but not everyone can do that, not everyone has the time
or inclination to do that, and you are making it sound like the
contractor - every contractor - is trying to get over on you. Which,
of course, is simply not the case.

Your comments about leverage are telling. Believe it or not, most
people in business for themselves don't need you to hold a big stick
to want to do a quick and clean job. Any type of threats, whether
boldly stated or implied, are counter-productive.

There are well-established customary practices in place for payment of
contractors, that vary from area to area, but in general, you want to
conform to what most people are used to and to what most people
believe is fair. Some guy from Manhattan, buying a house in Indiana,
and trying to get the guy remodeling his kitchen to go through the
lawyers and sign the 20 page contract (plus addenda) that the owner's
lawyer drafted up, is going to have a hard sell, even though that
might be standard in Manhattan.

R

benick

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 5:21:20 PM8/26/10
to
"DerbyDad03" <teama...@eznet.net> wrote in message
news:5d8fbc75-ea8d-4580...@k10g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...


I also wonder just how many of the shoddy jobs are because the homeowner
tried to get it done on the cheap..I wish for once he would just do what the
job cited with the same budget and show what it would look like....It's real
easy to sit back and find fault when you don't have to work within a budget
or bid...He also makes mistakes but only other contractors would notice...He
tries to make everyone think he knows it all but he doesn't..I've been on
cluster fuck jobs where you have everything going on at once and everyone
tripping over each other and the end result is seldom good...I would like to
see those jobs that happen so fast a few years down the road...Some
homeowners are made to believe that projects can be done that way , which
they can to a certain extent , but it will cost you...I'm not gonna pay to
have a crew there waiting around to jump in and hang a piece of drywall when
a space is vacated and stand around the rest of the time unless somebody is
writing big checks....Reality can be a slap in the face for some...

Clot

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 6:30:57 PM8/26/10
to
DerbyDad03 wrote:
> On Aug 26, 10:38 am, Ken <K...@invalid.com> wrote:
>> The prior message made want to ask the question. I get the program on
>> HGTV, but it might be on other channels as well. I think it is a
>> great program with not only shocking examples of work being done,
>> but some interesting techniques and material for accomplishing
>> tasks. Check it out.
>
> SWMBO loves it, so I DVR it and we watch it together sometimes.
>
> My pet peeve - which is the same with many other DIY shows - is how
> they repeat much of what you've already seen when they come back from
> a commercial.
>
> Do they think we're idiots and can't remember why they're fixing the
> house? H on H isn't as bad as some of the other shows, but the re-
> caps are still unnecessary.
>
The BBC is just as bad now. Drives me nuts, so I don't watch real time but
watch through the internet and cut out the cr*p. I guess that I watch the
real TV about two to three hours a week as the problem so winds me up. The
real reason of course, other than captivating the gormless who have replaced
Sky Fairies with watching the TV, is that a 60 minute prog. is now only 50
mins. long (say) and cuts costs.


Clot

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 6:31:47 PM8/26/10
to

Quite.


Clot

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 6:36:08 PM8/26/10
to

Quite.

Clot

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 6:31:47 PM8/26/10
to

Quite.


Clot

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 6:38:50 PM8/26/10
to
Clot wrote:
> Jim Elbrecht wrote:
>> "chaniarts" <chan...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Smitty Two wrote:
>>>> In article
>>>> <5d8fbc75-ea8d-4580...@k10g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
>>>> DerbyDad03 <teama...@eznet.net> wrote:
>>>>
>
Snipped

> Quite.

Apologies, OE went wild for a moment and I don't know why!


Clot

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 6:38:50 PM8/26/10
to
Clot wrote:
> Jim Elbrecht wrote:
>> "chaniarts" <chan...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Smitty Two wrote:
>>>> In article
>>>> <5d8fbc75-ea8d-4580...@k10g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
>>>> DerbyDad03 <teama...@eznet.net> wrote:
>>>>
>

Clot

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 6:38:50 PM8/26/10
to
Clot wrote:
> Jim Elbrecht wrote:
>> "chaniarts" <chan...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Smitty Two wrote:
>>>> In article
>>>> <5d8fbc75-ea8d-4580...@k10g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
>>>> DerbyDad03 <teama...@eznet.net> wrote:
>>>>
>

willshak

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 7:13:05 PM8/26/10
to
DGDevin wrote the following:

The NYS Attorney General has a page for checking contractor complaints,
similar to the BBB. Check with your state AG site.
http://nyknowyourcontractor.com/cfmqstaticdocs/


--

Bill
In Hamptonburgh, NY
In the original Orange County. Est. 1683
To email, remove the double zeroes after @

Steve Barker

unread,
Aug 26, 2010, 11:16:34 PM8/26/10
to

I must admit, you only hear the horror stories. The good ones don't
make the news. And yes, the only thing i hire out is carpet laying,
HVAC, and roofs. (i hate being on steep ones, i'll do the 4/12's <G>)

Airport Shuttle

unread,
Aug 27, 2010, 9:58:01 AM8/27/10
to

I like the Holmes on Home, quite funny.


--
Airport Shuttle
Message origin: TRAVEL.com

0 new messages