Did Jewish psyOp Nazis design our Sandy Hook Hoax based on the 1996 Dunblane massacre?

[William Gigantus]

Was the Newtown CT School Shooting Based on a Real Event? (Part 1)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljVkmxuB0x8


The truth is horrible; therefore, few care to believe it.
- Big Willy


April 9, 2015
Blueprint for a Mediated Massacre Event
http://memoryholeblog.com/2015/04/09/blueprint-for-a-mediated-massacre-event/#more-17455
By James F. Tracy

A recent BBC documentary airing in March 2015, Surviving Sandy Hook,
calls to mind the series of made-for-TV films produced by British news
media memorializing Dunblane. Indeed, the March 13, 1996 massacre of
16 five-to-six-year-old school children and their teacher in Dunblane
Scotland by a single recluse bears a number of similar characteristics
to the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre, yet Sandy Hook is seldom
considered in the context of this important precursor.

The foremost of such similarities is the fact that Dunblane was the
key pretext for the introduction of draconian gun laws and school
safety measures throughout the United Kingdom–a move ostensibly
pursued to placate grieving parents, some of whom advocated for such.
By late 1997, all cartridge-loading handguns had been banned
throughout the UK following separate legislation passed under the
Conservative and Labour governments of John Major and Tony Blair.


The Obama administration and enthusiastic gun control advocates like
Michael Bloomberg have been less successful in the wake of the Sandy
Hook massacre. Yet for this reason alone Dunblane should command the
attention of those who remain skeptical of the Newtown event and its
political implications.

On closer examination Dunblane shares a number of other uncanny
resemblances with Sandy Hook. For example, the “official story” of
Dunblane and its ensuing investigation, widely recounted via national
and international news media through a focus on grieving families, had
numerous inconsistencies that were not satisfactorily resolved in a
court of law. And, perhaps predictably, the lone assailant
mysteriously committed suicide to mark the shooting’s finale.

Further, no autopsies were ever conducted on the deceased as public
discourse surrounding the event swiftly transitioned to calls for
stricter gun control and school security measures.

As noted, the 1996 shooting is recounted in several “documentaries,”
such as this episode of the Crimes That Shook Britain television
series. Again, much like the coverage of Sandy Hook’s aftermath, the
overall story is presented through the observations of several
middle-age parents.



Critical book-length treatments of the Dunblane massacre and its
seriously flawed investigation are almost non-existent. An exception
is Sandra Uttley’s (very difficult to obtain) Dunblane Unburied, which
focuses on the official inquiry and the case’s many unexamined
inconsistencies, such as assailant Thomas Hamilton’s close association
with the Central Scotland Police.

“The British Government,” Uttley writes in the book’s conclusion,
“covered up the truth about what happened and ‘bought off’ the
bereaved parents by granting them their dearest wish–a ban on
handguns.”

She continues to explain Dunblane in prose that might be easily
applied to today to not just Sandy Hook, but other similarly curious
and poorly-investigated criminal events over the past few
decades–including the Boston Marathon bombing, the Aurora and Tucson
mass shootings, the London 7/7 bombing, and 9/11.

Just to mention Dunblane now brings the knee-jerk response of “we
don’t need to be reminded” and accusations of gratuitous reference.
Only when this situation is rectified will we, as a society, begin to
lift the wool from our eyes and learn at every level, that the
upholders of law and order are often an integral part of its very
breakdown. And when they are part of that breakdown, they must carry
the responsibility. the Denial of Dunblane will not end until then.

Connecticut and federal officials have provided what may be described
at best as a slipshod inquiry of Sandy Hook that likewise suggests an
effort to coverup either gross negligence or an entirely contrived
event. Only when the nation moves toward an honest accounting of
Newtown and similar tragedies can it likewise partake in forthright
discussions of school safety, mental health, and the right to firearms
ownership.

Such a discourse might begin by Connecticut’s public servants coming
clean with the basic documentation corroborating the events that
traumatized the nation and world on December 14, 2012.

There are those in certain policy circles who adhere to the notion
that the ends justify the means. At the very least, the many
similarities shared by Dunblane and Sandy Hook–including their almost
identical treatment by major news media–should prompt us to consider
much more closely the extent to which the former has served as a
template for the latter.

...
"PsyOps" is what happens when Jews take over your government.
- Big Willy

[Abigail Beecher]

Sandy Hook is pretty well acceptedto be a hoax.

[BDK]

In article <mg9mp0$6t7$1...@wieslauf.sub.de>, history...@chitown.com
says...

>
> Sandy Hook is pretty well acceptedto be a hoax.

By deranged people, yes.

--
BDK- Head Government Shill. FEMA Camp activity director.

[William Gigantus]

I used to think it was the Japs that had no imagination. Everything
they made (for a while after the war) was an imitation of something
made In America.

Now I see Jewish psyOp Nazis also have little imagination. They
designed a psyOp after a real event, even down to the time it started,
9:30 a.m.

COPY CAT COPY CAT SITTING ON A FENCE

TRYING TO MAKE A DOLLAR OUT OF FIFTEEN CENTS.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ray777 says:
APRIL 10, 2015 AT 8:07 AM
There can be no doubt that Dunblane was the model by which Sandy Hook
was conceived. I do not need to reiterate the aftermath repercussions
on gun ownership in the UK pursuant to the Dunblane incident, we all
know what happened.

Immediately after the Sandy Hook incident New York Democrat
legislators were proposing gun confiscation and Connecticut and New
York passed draconian gun regulation. Despite that so called “assault
rifles” and all other rifles combined with all sized magazine may
comprise approximately 300 of 8200 homicides last year -(a statistical
insignificant amount) all of the proposed legislation was focused on
restricting those guns and magazines. Even that congenital idiot Joe
Biden realized and stated that there will be no substantive reduction
in gun crimes by banning those guns.

At the Dylan Hockley funeral, a week after the incident, Nicole
Hockley immediately began preaching for changes making a political
speech in a thinly veiled disguise of a memorial service for her son.
Ms. Hockley’s comments utilized the name Newtown to project a metaphor
of a New Town whereby the changes began. Can there be any doubt this
is a purely political speech ? Who makes a professional video
production of a funeral service ?

Hence we now have these massive restrictions on these guns in
Connecticut whereby extensive law enforcement and private personal
resources are expended to register these guns and enforce the
applicable new laws.

The primary objective of Sandy Hook was to replicate the incident and
political aftermath results of Dunblane and we cannot delude ourselves
to believe otherwise.

[Abigail Beecher]

On 4/11/2015 6:57 AM, BDK wrote:
> In article <mg9mp0$6t7$1...@wieslauf.sub.de>, history...@chitown.com
> says...
>>
>> Sandy Hook is pretty well acceptedto be a hoax.
>
> By deranged people, yes.
>

Maybe you could tell us were the kids are buried or when the funerals
took place, who removed the bodies, who cleaned up the blood, and why
everything was staged before the hoax occurred? Why are the house in
town all bought on Christmas Day, now in forclosure or abandoned? Sucker.

[NEMO]

Maybe YOU could tell us why you have shit for brains, cunt?

[William Gigantus]

Maybe NEMO could tell us why psy-op Nazis hate Youtube.

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=sandy+hook+hoax

[Abigail Beecher]

> Maybe YOU could tell us why you have shit for brains, cunt?

Have you always been a sucker?

[NEMO]

On 5/6/2015 11:41 PM, Abigail Beecher wrote:
>> Maybe YOU could tell us why you have shit for brains, cunt?
>
> Have you always been a sucker?

WE aks the questions, cunt. Have you always sucked jew rectums?

[Michael Ejercito]

"NEMO" wrote in message news:mifp3v$83h$3...@news.mixmin.net...

Have you ever fucked women's vaginas?


Michael

[NEMO]

WE aks the questions, gook. Have you ALWAYS zsucked jew rectums?

[Heinrich]

In article <mig668$2dd$6...@news.mixmin.net>,
the limey sicko FAKE revd, forging as NEMO, wrote:

> This POS "Johaness von Ebersdorf" is in reality one Hans-Peter
> Skaliks, born in Germany in 1945 and later moved to Canada. He
> used to be an elementary schoolteacher, and lives in the
> Toronto area.

hoo-hoo-hoooo