The amusing irony is that the ignorant liberals of today call
Republicans Klan members, because they dare to criticize an unqualified
black Democrat Marxist acting as President.
The hypocrisy of America's educationally deficient liberal Democrats
knows no bounds.
> The original Ku Klux Klan, comprised almost entirely of Democrats, hated
> blacks and Republicans.
About 140 years ago. And 100 years ago Republicans were the party of
product safety, breaking up big business, and protecting the environment.
It must be hard for you to keep up with all the changes. Telephones,
wireless telegraph, automobiles --- guess that stuff just makes your head
spin.
--
Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/> September 5867, 1993
245 days since Rick Warren prayed over Bush's third term.
Obama: No hope, no change, more of the same. Yes, he can, but no, he won't.
Yep. Then, after dems backed the civil rights bill of '64, the dixiecrats
ran to the republican party. You know, the one David Duke says is the only
party in which a racist can still find a home.
"Historical Facts" <fa...@history.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9C8F183561D6A00G1R@localhost...
>In our last episode, <Xns9C8F183561D6A00G1R@localhost>, the lovely and
>talented Historical Facts broadcast on alt.politics.democrats:
]
>> The original Ku Klux Klan, comprised almost entirely of Democrats, hated
>> blacks and Republicans.
>About 140 years ago. And 100 years ago Republicans were the party of
>product safety, breaking up big business, and protecting the environment.
Lincoln was a Republican. The KKK was founded by the 'rat South.
Smile - it only hurts for a while.
The Dukester, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:01:52 +0000 (UTC), Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com>
> wrote:
>>In our last episode, <Xns9C8F183561D6A00G1R@localhost>, the lovely and
>>talented Historical Facts broadcast on alt.politics.democrats:
> ]
>>> The original Ku Klux Klan, comprised almost entirely of Democrats, hated
>>> blacks and Republicans.
>>About 140 years ago. And 100 years ago Republicans were the party of
>>product safety, breaking up big business, and protecting the environment.
> Lincoln was a Republican. The KKK was founded by the 'rat South.
To people of principle, party labels are meaningless. Today Republicans
stand for racism. A hundred years ago it was Democrats. People who don't
need a Hitler Youth to tell them the difference between right and wrong
oppose racism whatever name or label it goes by.
--
Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/> September 5867, 1993
246 days since Rick Warren prayed over Bush's third term.
Your ignorance is showing, "Rightard." BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
http://www.tysknews.com/Depts/pcism/sad_history.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan
Yep. Then, after dems backed the civil rights bill of '64, the dixiecrats
Yep. Then, after dems backed the civil rights bill of '64, the dixiecrats
ran to the republican party. You know, the one David Duke says is the only
party in which a racist can still find a home.
>
>
> Amused wrote:
>> "Geno4321" <eugen...@fuse.net> wrote in message
>> news:a460a$4aba5057$4ad703bf$15...@FUSE.NET...
>>> Just a cock and bull lie from the Rightard tea suckers.
>>
>> Your ignorance is showing, "Rightard." BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
>>
>> http://www.tysknews.com/Depts/pcism/sad_history.htm
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan
>
> Yep. Then, after dems backed the civil rights bill of '64, the
> dixiecrats
> ran to the republican party. You know, the one David Duke says is the
> only party in which a racist can still find a home.
It must suck to be hampered by a liberal education. Too bad for you.
"Six-time Socialist Party candidate for president of the U.S., Norman
Mattoon Thomas, said in a speech in 1944 that "The American people will
never knowingly adopt Socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism' they
will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America
will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened."
Then, he went on to say, "I no longer need to run as a presidential
candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democratic Party has adopted our
platform."
Twist it and try to revise it any way you want. The historical facts are
set in stone. Deal with it.
> In our last episode, <er0lb590nack738p7...@4ax.com>, the
> lovely and talented duke broadcast on alt.politics.democrats:
>
>> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:01:52 +0000 (UTC), Lars Eighner
>> <use...@larseighner.com> wrote:
>
>>>In our last episode, <Xns9C8F183561D6A00G1R@localhost>, the lovely
>>>and talented Historical Facts broadcast on alt.politics.democrats:
>> ]
>>>> The original Ku Klux Klan, comprised almost entirely of Democrats,
>>>> hated blacks and Republicans.
>
>>>About 140 years ago. And 100 years ago Republicans were the party of
>>>product safety, breaking up big business, and protecting the
>>>environment.
>
>> Lincoln was a Republican. The KKK was founded by the 'rat South.
Southerners were Democrats and largely still are today. Plenty of them
cross party lines to vote and protect their interests.
> To people of principle, party labels are meaningless. Today
> Republicans stand for racism. A hundred years ago it was Democrats.
> People who don't need a Hitler Youth to tell them the difference
> between right and wrong oppose racism whatever name or label it goes
> by.
Gotta disagree with you there, Lars. The Democrats of the past three
decades have done their best to emphasize and promote racism by simply
not letting it die. There will always be color and there will always be
insults involving color. You can call it racism or ice cream, it won't
make any difference.
Democrats have seized on the word, and use it as a media weapon to
target opponents. Nobody likes being called a racist, and there is
little defense against it because of liberal PC over-sensitivity and
"diversity." Once branded, true or not, the label is lifelong because
of the fickle public, who will largely recall the first negative
impression.
"Racism" was on the way out in the South until the Yankees decided that
blacks should not own other blacks. That's what the Civil war was
really fought over, blacks owning blacks, not whites owning blacks.
Slavery was just a label to slap on an "honorable" crusade to encourage
Yankees sending sons off to war.
What you won't read about in Yankee or current liberal texts, is how
many Southerners had voluntarily freed their slaves, giving them a place
to live, and ground to work. This was happening long before the Civil
War broke out. Democrats did not like this and fought the trend with
violence and politics.
One thing liberals can't lie about and get away with is the National
Archives. It's all there in the Census Data from 30 to 40 years prior
to the Civil War breaking out. All you have to do is look, it's all
scanned and on line.
That's true. The Democratic party of 150 years ago, or even 50 years
ago, was a lot more conservative than it is today. It was also a lot
more male, a lot meaner, a lot whiter and a lot more oriented toward
states rights than it is today. Democrats abandoned the racism, the
bigotry, the isolationism and the segregation and the Republicans
promptly stepped into the void, making the south the last Republican
stronghold in the country. The Republicans took the Dixiecrats
unwanted, outdated, worn out political hand me downs and have been
running around in them since about 1968. The Democrats grew up and
made the tent bigger; The Republicans continue to regress, shrinking
the tent to this day and inexorably slouching backward toward the
plantation era. The Democrats abandoned the same dreadful, 19th
century attitudes and behavior the Republicans are eagerly embracing
right now.
Now that Glen Beck is on at 5:00 every day, who needs all that book
learnin?
Fox News tells me all I need to know about history, science, politics
and current affairs. And I don't have to pay for anything cause it's
free, so is Rush, the best teacher there ever wuz.
David Duke says that the niggers have all been brainwashed because
they're dumb. That's why they're with the Dems and not with us.
--
Fight Change, Fight Hope - Keep the Goverment out of our Medicare
You got a lot of nerve posting intelligent, historically-based
analysis here, buddy.
>In our last episode, <er0lb590nack738p7...@4ax.com>, the
>lovely and talented duke broadcast on alt.politics.democrats:
>
>> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:01:52 +0000 (UTC), Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com>
>> wrote:
>
>>>In our last episode, <Xns9C8F183561D6A00G1R@localhost>, the lovely and
>>>talented Historical Facts broadcast on alt.politics.democrats:
>> ]
>>>> The original Ku Klux Klan, comprised almost entirely of Democrats, hated
>>>> blacks and Republicans.
>
>>>About 140 years ago. And 100 years ago Republicans were the party of
>>>product safety, breaking up big business, and protecting the environment.
>
>> Lincoln was a Republican. The KKK was founded by the 'rat South.
>
>To people of principle, party labels are meaningless. Today Republicans
>stand for racism.
Is your name jimmy cartier?
> A hundred years ago it was Democrats. People who don't
>need a Hitler Youth to tell them the difference between right and wrong
>oppose racism whatever name or label it goes by.
The biggest racists in this country today are the blacks. They have declared,
and I quote, blacks cannot be racist because a racist is a white person.
Haven't seen anything of him in many years.
> The biggest racists in this country today are the blacks. They have declared,
> and I quote, blacks cannot be racist because a racist is a white person.
All "blacks" have declared that? Or are you quoting some specific
individual without attribution?
You're generalizing something to a specific race, and I'll bet you
don't think you're a racist.
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:27:53 +0000 (UTC), Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com>
> wrote:
>>In our last episode, <er0lb590nack738p7...@4ax.com>, the
>>lovely and talented duke broadcast on alt.politics.democrats:
>>
>>> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:01:52 +0000 (UTC), Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com>
>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>In our last episode, <Xns9C8F183561D6A00G1R@localhost>, the lovely and
>>>>talented Historical Facts broadcast on alt.politics.democrats:
>>> ]
>>>>> The original Ku Klux Klan, comprised almost entirely of Democrats, hated
>>>>> blacks and Republicans.
>>
>>>>About 140 years ago. And 100 years ago Republicans were the party of
>>>>product safety, breaking up big business, and protecting the environment.
>>
>>> Lincoln was a Republican. The KKK was founded by the 'rat South.
>>
>>To people of principle, party labels are meaningless. Today Republicans
>>stand for racism.
> Is your name jimmy cartier?
>> A hundred years ago it was Democrats. People who don't
>>need a Hitler Youth to tell them the difference between right and wrong
>>oppose racism whatever name or label it goes by.
> The biggest racists in this country today are the blacks.
No, there are only a handful of black racists in America, such as Clarence
Thomas.
> They have declared, and I quote, blacks cannot be racist because a racist
> is a white person.
No. Anyone who supports racism, which is a system, is a racist. In America
there is only one racist system. It is white racism. Although every white
person in America derives benefits from this system, many white people oppose
it. But the whites who support the white system and the few people of
color who also support it are racists.
--
Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/> September 5868, 1993
247 days since Rick Warren prayed over Bush's third term.
> It must suck to be hampered by a liberal education. Too bad for you.
Indeed, it must really such to only rely on bogus right-wing "history"!
> "Six-time Socialist Party candidate for president of the U.S., Norman
> Mattoon Thomas, said in a speech in 1944 that "The American people will
> never knowingly adopt Socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism' they
> will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America
> will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened."
>
> Then, he went on to say, "I no longer need to run as a presidential
> candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democratic Party has adopted our
> platform."
>
> Twist it and try to revise it any way you want. The historical facts are
> set in stone. Deal with it.
>
"But did Thomas ever make this statement? Although these words have been
attributed to him for several decades, apparently no one has ever been able
to turn up a source documenting that he actually said (or wrote) them, in
1944 or at any other time."
http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/socialism.asp
Deal with it, INDEED!
Wow, you're really stupid!
You would know, Goober, since you're always on the lying side and now
you're being exposed.
Great to be us libs these days! With you kkklowns out and headed for
extinction, we can repair the great damage that conservaloon policies
have done to this nation since Bonzo dozed his way through his terms.
> That's true. The Democratic party of 150 years ago, or even 50 years
> ago, was a lot more conservative than it is today. It was also a lot
> more male, a lot meaner, a lot whiter and a lot more oriented toward
> states rights than it is today. Democrats abandoned the racism,
Then why did you vote in a racist? Why did Obama support financially and
attend for over twenty years a racist hate church? Was it because he
"abandoned" racism? You see, Helms, this glaringly OBVIOUS bullshit you post
without THINKING is why I assert that you're a dumbass, and you are.
> the
> bigotry,
Your post is perfect display of projection.
> the isolationism
Isolationism is decidedly left-wing.
> and the segregation
The congressional black caucus is republican?
> and the Republicans
> promptly stepped into the void, making the south the last Republican
> stronghold in the country. The Republicans took the Dixiecrats
> unwanted, outdated, worn out political hand me downs and have been
> running around in them since about 1968.
Really? McCain, Bush I, Bush II, Reagan, and Nixon ran on a segregationist
platform?
Hahahahah!
> The Democrats grew up and
> made the tent bigger; The Republicans continue to regress, shrinking
> the tent to this day and inexorably slouching backward toward the
> plantation era.
Plantation? Ohh, you mean like kids in failed inner city schools that you
won't let off the plantation via vouchers or school choice. All because the
NEA pays democrats big bucks. Oh, and didn't Obama give big bucks to
"education" in the so-called "stimulus" - tax payer funded contributions to
the democrat party?
Oh, yeeah.. Democrats love minorities. That's why they came up with the "pay
'em ta have babies out of wedlock" scheme with the great society. You
couldn't have wrought more damage and destruction on blacks if you tried.
Worked perfectly - a solid voting block of government dependants. Now
they're trying to pull the same scam on everyone with so-called healthcare
reform.
> The Democrats abandoned the same dreadful, 19th
> century attitudes and behavior the Republicans are eagerly embracing
> right now.
Yeah, you've forsaken Kings dream of a color blind society and took a shit
on the civil rights act. After all, them inferior coloreds need extra help.
Really, Helms, your view of the democrat party is a ridiculously phony
caricature - one that you are too stupid to see through.
Obama's racist associations:
Rev. Wright, whose church Obama attended and supported financially for over
20 years:
"Barack knows what it means living in a country and a culture that is
controlled by rich white people."
Rev. Lowery, hand picked by Obama to deliver the inaugural benediction:
"Lord, in the memory of all the saints who from their labors rest, and in
the joy of a new beginning, we ask you to help us work for that day when
black will not be asked to get in back, when brown can stick around, when
yellow will be mellow, when the red man can get ahead, man; and when white
will embrace what is right."
Sonia Sotomayor, Obama's pick for the SC:
"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences
would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who
hasn't lived that life."
From Obama's book:
"White man's greed runs a world in need."
Prof. Gates, anti-white racist who Obama says is a friend of his.
Van Jones, anti-white racist communist truther KOOK!
Anyone who can't see what Obama is all about - that he possesses a divisive,
racist get back at whitey mentality has their head up their ass.
-Eddie Haskell
Isolationism is left wing? Is that why Democrat FDR wanted to get us
involved in WWII? Was Neville Chamberlain a left winger? No, he
certainly wasn't. Better luck next time, Fox News numbnut.
>
> Just because you football fags have gay fantasies of being dominated
> by black boys doesn't mean existing facts are racist in nature.
Apparently the only thing being dominated is your mind, and it's pretty
obvious by what.
Get help. There's no need to live in fear of yourself.