info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
NOW SCHRODINGER SAYS THAT NO THEORY CAN EVER BE PROVED...............OH MY F---ING GOD
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Double-Aces
Jan 12, 2012, 5:05:05 PM1/12/12
to
HOLD THE PRESSES, NOW THE SCHRODIE SAYS THAT """ONE CAN NEVER PROVE A
THEORY""" Look you dumbass, global warming is a theory that will never be
proven, because it is not real. But how can you say that the theory that the
Earth was round was not proven by spacecraft that photographed it from
above.
Do you take pills for your condition? because if not you really need to see
a doctor.
THEORY""" Look you dumbass, global warming is a theory that will never be
proven, because it is not real. But how can you say that the theory that the
Earth was round was not proven by spacecraft that photographed it from
above.
Do you take pills for your condition? because if not you really need to see
a doctor.
erschro...@gmail.com
Jan 13, 2012, 9:41:56 AM1/13/12
to
On Jan 12, 5:05 pm, "Double-Aces" <fishermans.c...@comcast.net> wrote:
> HOLD THE PRESSES, NOW THE SCHRODIE SAYS THAT """ONE CAN NEVER PROVE A
> THEORY""" Look you dumbass, global warming is a theory that will never be
> proven, because it is not real. But how can you say that the theory that the
> Earth was round
There was no theory that the earth was wrong. "The earth is round" is
> HOLD THE PRESSES, NOW THE SCHRODIE SAYS THAT """ONE CAN NEVER PROVE A
> THEORY""" Look you dumbass, global warming is a theory that will never be
> proven, because it is not real. But how can you say that the theory that the
> Earth was round
not an explanation. "The earth is round" is a fact.
"Two objects attract each other" is also not a theory but a fact. We
call this attraction "gravity."
Newton came up with a theory about gravity -- attactive forces between
the 2 objects. Einstein came up with a different theory about gravity
-- curved space-time. Einstein's theory has supplanted Newton's for
the time being (although when gravity is incorporated into quantum
mechanics, most scientists think that will provide a better and more
complete theory of gravity).
> was not proven by spacecraft that photographed it from
> above.
>
> Do you take pills for your condition? because if not you really need to see
> a doctor.
science class. Even if you drop out after the first week, you'll
learn what a theory is.
Blue
Jan 14, 2012, 9:31:25 PM1/14/12
to
On 13/01/2012 14:41, erschro...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Jan 12, 5:05 pm, "Double-Aces"<fishermans.c...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> HOLD THE PRESSES, NOW THE SCHRODIE SAYS THAT """ONE CAN NEVER PROVE A
>> THEORY""" Look you dumbass, global warming is a theory that will never be
>> proven, because it is not real. But how can you say that the theory that the
>> Earth was round
>
>
> There was no theory that the earth was wrong. "The earth is round" is
> not an explanation. "The earth is round" is a fact.
Well, round can mean a circular flat disc.
> On Jan 12, 5:05 pm, "Double-Aces"<fishermans.c...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> HOLD THE PRESSES, NOW THE SCHRODIE SAYS THAT """ONE CAN NEVER PROVE A
>> THEORY""" Look you dumbass, global warming is a theory that will never be
>> proven, because it is not real. But how can you say that the theory that the
>> Earth was round
>
>
> There was no theory that the earth was wrong. "The earth is round" is
> not an explanation. "The earth is round" is a fact.
You mean the earth is ellipsoid.
> "Two objects attract each other" is also not a theory but a fact. We
> call this attraction "gravity."
Or 2 magnets pushing apart.
Double-Aces
Jan 14, 2012, 9:56:12 PM1/14/12
to
I meant round, I could also have used the word sphere, I suggest you pick up
a thesaurus and stop acting like a child, unless of coarse you are a child.
That being said I am doubtful that you can grasp the concept that
Christopher Columbus and other mariners after him clearly proved that the
oceans had no edge to fall off of. However the theory that the Earth was in
fact round (or whatever adjective your little mind prefers) was not proven
completely and absolutely in the minds of the meek until the first
spacecraft got far enough from the earth to photograph the curvature of the
Earth. I remember this time and the photo, it was magical. Thus schrodies
babble that no theory can ever be proven is just more of the global warming
religions pick and choose the info that suits their needs mentality. It is a
sad religion.
"Blue" wrote in message news:9nes3n...@mid.individual.net...
a thesaurus and stop acting like a child, unless of coarse you are a child.
That being said I am doubtful that you can grasp the concept that
Christopher Columbus and other mariners after him clearly proved that the
oceans had no edge to fall off of. However the theory that the Earth was in
fact round (or whatever adjective your little mind prefers) was not proven
completely and absolutely in the minds of the meek until the first
spacecraft got far enough from the earth to photograph the curvature of the
Earth. I remember this time and the photo, it was magical. Thus schrodies
babble that no theory can ever be proven is just more of the global warming
religions pick and choose the info that suits their needs mentality. It is a
sad religion.
"Blue" wrote in message news:9nes3n...@mid.individual.net...
Blue
Jan 15, 2012, 11:53:13 AM1/15/12
to
On 15/01/2012 02:56, Double-Aces wrote:
> I meant round, I could also have used the word sphere, I suggest you
> pick up a thesaurus and stop acting like a child, unless of coarse you
> are a child. That being said I am doubtful that you can grasp the
> concept that Christopher Columbus and other mariners after him clearly
> proved that the oceans had no edge to fall off of. However the theory
> that the Earth was in fact round (or whatever adjective your little mind
> prefers) was not proven completely and absolutely in the minds of the
> meek until the first spacecraft got far enough from the earth to
> photograph the curvature of the Earth. I remember this time and the
> photo, it was magical. Thus schrodies babble that no theory can ever be
> proven is just more of the global warming religions pick and choose the
> info that suits their needs mentality. It is a sad religion.
----
> I meant round, I could also have used the word sphere, I suggest you
> pick up a thesaurus and stop acting like a child, unless of coarse you
> are a child. That being said I am doubtful that you can grasp the
> concept that Christopher Columbus and other mariners after him clearly
> proved that the oceans had no edge to fall off of. However the theory
> that the Earth was in fact round (or whatever adjective your little mind
> prefers) was not proven completely and absolutely in the minds of the
> meek until the first spacecraft got far enough from the earth to
> photograph the curvature of the Earth. I remember this time and the
> photo, it was magical. Thus schrodies babble that no theory can ever be
> proven is just more of the global warming religions pick and choose the
> info that suits their needs mentality. It is a sad religion.
During the early Middle Ages, virtually all scholars maintained
the spherical viewpoint first expressed by the Ancient Greeks.
By the 14th century, belief in a flat earth among the educated
was essentially dead.
Irving's biography of Columbus
One of his more fanciful embellishments was a highly unlikely
tale that the more ignorant and bigoted members on the commission
had raised scriptural objections to Columbus's assertions that
the Earth was spherical.[17]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myth_of_the_Flat_Earth#cite_note-5
Double-Aces
Jan 15, 2012, 3:46:28 PM1/15/12
to
In your mind virtually all middle age scholars believed as you say, just
like all scientist (whatever that is anyway) believe in global warming
caused by man. Of coarse Ivar Giaever the dude who won a nobel prize for
electron tunneling and who thinks that global warming actually refers to a
wacky religion as do I think yer a religious fanatic, who has no interest in
the truth, if it differs from what your god (Al Gore) has proclaimed.
Now grow up already.
"Blue" wrote in message news:9ngejj...@mid.individual.net...
like all scientist (whatever that is anyway) believe in global warming
caused by man. Of coarse Ivar Giaever the dude who won a nobel prize for
electron tunneling and who thinks that global warming actually refers to a
wacky religion as do I think yer a religious fanatic, who has no interest in
the truth, if it differs from what your god (Al Gore) has proclaimed.
Now grow up already.
"Blue" wrote in message news:9ngejj...@mid.individual.net...
Blue
Jan 15, 2012, 4:07:37 PM1/15/12
to
On 15/01/2012 20:46, Double-Aces wrote:
> In your mind virtually all middle age scholars believed as you say, just
> like all scientist (whatever that is anyway) believe in global warming
> caused by man. Of coarse Ivar Giaever the dude who won a nobel prize for
> electron tunneling and who thinks that global warming actually refers to
> a wacky religion as do I think yer a religious fanatic, who has no
> interest in the truth, if it differs from what your god (Al Gore) has
> proclaimed.
I don't believe in AGW, or any God.
> In your mind virtually all middle age scholars believed as you say, just
> like all scientist (whatever that is anyway) believe in global warming
> caused by man. Of coarse Ivar Giaever the dude who won a nobel prize for
> electron tunneling and who thinks that global warming actually refers to
> a wacky religion as do I think yer a religious fanatic, who has no
> interest in the truth, if it differs from what your god (Al Gore) has
> proclaimed.
Dean Dark
Jan 15, 2012, 6:34:36 PM1/15/12
to
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 15:46:28 -0500, Jim "Closet Gay, Individual
Serving Size Corningware Expert, World Class Bullshit Artist, Lousy
Father, Cuckold, Paranoid and All-Round Asshole" Howarth, of Hazlet,
NJ <fisherm...@comcast.net> sat in the corner of his dirty, dark
bedroom in his smelly little home, whimpering and licking his wounds,
wishing hard that he'd stayed in school and paid more attention, but
he tugged on his diseased little pee-pee anyway, and this dribbled
out:
>Of coarse
Jim, how many times do you have to be told that it's "of course?"
I suppose you still think that the bears are eating their small change
as well.
It's no wonder that you're wrong so much, you simply have an innate
inability to learn.
It must truly suck to be you.
Serving Size Corningware Expert, World Class Bullshit Artist, Lousy
Father, Cuckold, Paranoid and All-Round Asshole" Howarth, of Hazlet,
NJ <fisherm...@comcast.net> sat in the corner of his dirty, dark
bedroom in his smelly little home, whimpering and licking his wounds,
wishing hard that he'd stayed in school and paid more attention, but
he tugged on his diseased little pee-pee anyway, and this dribbled
out:
>Of coarse
Jim, how many times do you have to be told that it's "of course?"
I suppose you still think that the bears are eating their small change
as well.
It's no wonder that you're wrong so much, you simply have an innate
inability to learn.
It must truly suck to be you.
Double-Aces
Jan 15, 2012, 6:49:08 PM1/15/12
to
What I think is that you are an extremely sad person with nothing better to
do, than correct my frikin spelling....................it's weawwy kind of
fwunny.
"Dean Dark" wrote in message
news:6eo6h7t7v9m78m3dt...@4ax.com...
do, than correct my frikin spelling....................it's weawwy kind of
fwunny.
"Dean Dark" wrote in message
news:6eo6h7t7v9m78m3dt...@4ax.com...
Double-Aces
Jan 15, 2012, 6:51:42 PM1/15/12
to
And God does not believe in you
either............................................
However if you should choose to end your evil ways and move into the light,
the Lord will show you compassion.
"Blue" wrote in message news:9ngtgj...@mid.individual.net...
either............................................
However if you should choose to end your evil ways and move into the light,
the Lord will show you compassion.
"Blue" wrote in message news:9ngtgj...@mid.individual.net...
gordo
Jan 16, 2012, 12:40:09 AM1/16/12
to
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 21:07:37 +0000, Blue <bl...@there.com> wrote:
>On 15/01/2012 20:46, Double-Aces wrote:
>> In your mind virtually all middle age scholars believed as you say, just
>> like all scientist (whatever that is anyway) believe in global warming
>> caused by man. Of coarse Ivar Giaever the dude who won a nobel prize for
>> electron tunneling and who thinks that global warming actually refers to
>> a wacky religion as do I think yer a religious fanatic, who has no
>> interest in the truth, if it differs from what your god (Al Gore) has
>> proclaimed.
>
>
>I don't believe in AGW, or any God.
AGW is an observed fact. God is not. Rush thinks that the creator
>On 15/01/2012 20:46, Double-Aces wrote:
>> In your mind virtually all middle age scholars believed as you say, just
>> like all scientist (whatever that is anyway) believe in global warming
>> caused by man. Of coarse Ivar Giaever the dude who won a nobel prize for
>> electron tunneling and who thinks that global warming actually refers to
>> a wacky religion as do I think yer a religious fanatic, who has no
>> interest in the truth, if it differs from what your god (Al Gore) has
>> proclaimed.
>
>
>I don't believe in AGW, or any God.
would not creat us to destroy the earth. Is Rush real?
Last Post
Jan 16, 2012, 2:40:03 AM1/16/12
to
> On Jan 12, 5:05 pm, "Double-Aces" <fishermans.c...@comcast.net> wrote:
HOLD THE PRESSES,
NOW THE SCHRODIE SAYS THAT
"""ONE CAN NEVER PROVE A THEORY"""
> > Look you dumbass, global warming is a theory that will
> > never be proven, because it is not real. But how can you
> >say that the theory that the Earth was round
>
> There was no theory that the earth was wrong.
> "The earth is round" is not an explanation.
> "The earth is round" is a fact.
ø Not true, buddy!!
HOLD THE PRESSES,
NOW THE SCHRODIE SAYS THAT
"""ONE CAN NEVER PROVE A THEORY"""
> > Look you dumbass, global warming is a theory that will
> > never be proven, because it is not real. But how can you
> >say that the theory that the Earth was round
>
> There was no theory that the earth was wrong.
> "The earth is round" is not an explanation.
> "The earth is round" is a fact.
Not even close.
It is a 4 way ellipse.
ø erschroedinger AKA Lloyd Parker has lost it.
He may soon lose his Jr College teaching job.
A few years back Emory required him to stop
posting on usenet. He had to buy a pay site &
select a nym away from the school.
Blue
Jan 16, 2012, 6:22:21 AM1/16/12
to
On 15/01/2012 23:51, Double-Aces wrote:
> And God does not believe in you
> either............................................
>
> However if you should choose to end your evil ways and move into the
> light, the Lord will show you compassion.
Nonsense, of course.
> And God does not believe in you
> either............................................
>
> However if you should choose to end your evil ways and move into the
> light, the Lord will show you compassion.
Blue
Jan 16, 2012, 6:39:55 AM1/16/12
to
On 16/01/2012 05:40, gordo wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 21:07:37 +0000, Blue<bl...@there.com> wrote:
>
>> On 15/01/2012 20:46, Double-Aces wrote:
>>> In your mind virtually all middle age scholars believed as you say, just
>>> like all scientist (whatever that is anyway) believe in global warming
>>> caused by man. Of coarse Ivar Giaever the dude who won a nobel prize for
>>> electron tunneling and who thinks that global warming actually refers to
>>> a wacky religion as do I think yer a religious fanatic, who has no
>>> interest in the truth, if it differs from what your god (Al Gore) has
>>> proclaimed.
>>
>>
>> I don't believe in AGW, or any God.
>
> AGW is an observed fact.
You can see heat?
> On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 21:07:37 +0000, Blue<bl...@there.com> wrote:
>
>> On 15/01/2012 20:46, Double-Aces wrote:
>>> In your mind virtually all middle age scholars believed as you say, just
>>> like all scientist (whatever that is anyway) believe in global warming
>>> caused by man. Of coarse Ivar Giaever the dude who won a nobel prize for
>>> electron tunneling and who thinks that global warming actually refers to
>>> a wacky religion as do I think yer a religious fanatic, who has no
>>> interest in the truth, if it differs from what your god (Al Gore) has
>>> proclaimed.
>>
>>
>> I don't believe in AGW, or any God.
>
> AGW is an observed fact.
As I have pointed out elsewhere in the Lloyd Parker thread.
It's all models, what the unadjusted troposphere readings
do pick up is cooling.
God is not.
Clearly
Rush thinks that the creator
> would not creat us to destroy the earth. Is Rush real?
I don't know what you're talking about.
Dean Dark
Jan 16, 2012, 7:01:19 AM1/16/12
to
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 18:49:08 -0500, Jim "Closet Gay, Individual
understand that is the main symptom of your problem. You are living
proof that there are some innately dumb people who just *cannot*
learn.
Go feed some more nickels and dimes to the bears, you pathetic idiot.
Serving Size Corningware Expert, World Class Bullshit Artist, Lousy
Father, Cuckold, Paranoid and All-Round Asshole" Howarth, of Hazlet,
NJ <fisherm...@comcast.net> sat in the corner of his dirty, dark
bedroom in his smelly little home, whimpering and licking his wounds,
wishing hard that he'd stayed in school and paid more attention, but
he tugged on his diseased little pee-pee anyway, and this dribbled
out:
Father, Cuckold, Paranoid and All-Round Asshole" Howarth, of Hazlet,
NJ <fisherm...@comcast.net> sat in the corner of his dirty, dark
bedroom in his smelly little home, whimpering and licking his wounds,
wishing hard that he'd stayed in school and paid more attention, but
he tugged on his diseased little pee-pee anyway, and this dribbled
out:
>What I think is that you are an extremely sad person with nothing better to
>do, than correct my frikin spelling....................it's weawwy kind of
It's far more than your spelling that is wrong, Jim. That you don't
>do, than correct my frikin spelling....................it's weawwy kind of
understand that is the main symptom of your problem. You are living
proof that there are some innately dumb people who just *cannot*
learn.
Go feed some more nickels and dimes to the bears, you pathetic idiot.
gordo
Jan 16, 2012, 2:45:21 PM1/16/12
to
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:39:55 +0000, Blue <bl...@there.com> wrote:
>On 16/01/2012 05:40, gordo wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 21:07:37 +0000, Blue<bl...@there.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 15/01/2012 20:46, Double-Aces wrote:
>>>> In your mind virtually all middle age scholars believed as you say, just
>>>> like all scientist (whatever that is anyway) believe in global warming
>>>> caused by man. Of coarse Ivar Giaever the dude who won a nobel prize for
>>>> electron tunneling and who thinks that global warming actually refers to
>>>> a wacky religion as do I think yer a religious fanatic, who has no
>>>> interest in the truth, if it differs from what your god (Al Gore) has
>>>> proclaimed.
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't believe in AGW, or any God.
>>
>> AGW is an observed fact.
>
>You can see heat?
It is measureable of course.
>On 16/01/2012 05:40, gordo wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 21:07:37 +0000, Blue<bl...@there.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 15/01/2012 20:46, Double-Aces wrote:
>>>> In your mind virtually all middle age scholars believed as you say, just
>>>> like all scientist (whatever that is anyway) believe in global warming
>>>> caused by man. Of coarse Ivar Giaever the dude who won a nobel prize for
>>>> electron tunneling and who thinks that global warming actually refers to
>>>> a wacky religion as do I think yer a religious fanatic, who has no
>>>> interest in the truth, if it differs from what your god (Al Gore) has
>>>> proclaimed.
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't believe in AGW, or any God.
>>
>> AGW is an observed fact.
>
>You can see heat?
>As I have pointed out elsewhere in the Lloyd Parker thread.
>It's all models, what the unadjusted troposphere readings
>do pick up is cooling.
(CO2) in the atmosphere have resulted in the warming of the
troposphere and cooling of the stratosphere.
http://skepticalscience.com/Stratospheric_Cooling.html
Graphs and everything.
> God is not.
>
>
>Clearly
>
>
> Rush thinks that the creator
>> would not creat us to destroy the earth. Is Rush real?
>
>
>As a newcomer to the Planet of the Apes might say,
> I don't know what you're talking about.
an audience of 14 million says that the creator would not create
something that would destroy itself. If you never heard of him it is
fine you never missed much. Video of what the clown said is here.
http://mediamatters.org/research/201112190006
erschro...@gmail.com
Jan 16, 2012, 5:33:26 PM1/16/12
to
On Jan 12, 5:05 pm, "Double-Aces" <fishermans.c...@comcast.net> wrote:
Read the last paragraph before "examples."
0 new messages