SIGNS OF A WARMING WORLD? Damage from "Extreme" Weather Predicted in New South Wales
john fernbach
in New South Wales -
But Also The State Government's Predictions of "Extreme" Climate
Changes That Will
Hurt Wildlife, Reduce Water Supplies for City Dwellers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW SOUTH WALES IS FINALLY GETTING SOME LONG-AWAITED RAIN,
According to the Telegraph.
But unfortunately,
-----------------------------------------
" ... the rainfall came as the NSW Department of Environment and
Conservation warned that extreme climate change could decimate the
state's wildlife, devastate the Snowy Mountains and cause extreme
bushfires that could threaten Sydney's air and water supply.
A confidential draft of the department's first-ever climate change
action plan, obtained by The Daily Telegraph under Freedom of
Information, says there is a "vital need" to start factoring climate
change into the future management of the state's natural resources.
It warns that the impact of increasing temperatures and changing
rainfall patterns is already being seen and outlines a seven-point plan
to reduce future "inevitable" damage ... "
Full story is available here:
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,21003227-5006009,00.html
kdt...@yahoo.com
So what. There is no scientific basis that shows the cause and effect
between CO2 and any temperature fluctuation of the earth. There is no
valid scientific theory for this conclusion.
It is pure insantity to promote modifcation of the economy according to
laws that define CO2 as illegal. Only insane and persistent fascists
advocate this course of action and the indirect or direct genocide that
this would entail or require.Just keep on pretending to be a class
three grennie, that just doesn't really understand his involvement. In
the meantime, you freaks and your propaganda can go straight to hell.
I wasn't joking, Fernbach. The British Nazi, Hoogle, really does think
you have a cute ass. He really wants to plug it with his Al Gore
corncob. How does that make you feel?
Deatherage
CO2Phobia is a dangerous and fatal disease like rabies.
BC
FYI -- in terms of science and the global warming
"debate," this is how the two main sides line up:
Side One: with few and fast diminishing exceptions, the
entire global scientific community:
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change
http://nationalacademies.org/onpi/06072005.pdf
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2004/12/index/#Global
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/06/national-academies-synthesis-report
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-1489955,00.html
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/7665636
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686
Side Two: again with extremely few exceptions, pro-
lassiez-faire, right-wing, anti-science frauds &
crackpots and their organizations, often couched in
bogus, scientific-sounding names, publications and
web sites, not to mention being funded by the likes
of ExxonMobil and Philip Morris:
http://www.globalwarming.org
http://www.nationalcenter.org/Kyoto.html
http://www.cato.org/hottopics/globalwarming.html
http://www.oism.org/news
http://www.friendsofscience.org
http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=10488
http://www.envirotruth.org
http://www.marshall.org
http://www.sepp.org
http://www.climateark.org
http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=013106I
http://www.junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Warming_Look.htm
http://www.americanpolicy.org
Some background to some of these sites and
the companies and people behind them:
http://www.environmentaldefense.org/article.cfm?contentid=4870
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Steve_Milloy
http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/lastword/story/0,13228,1398885,00.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/climatechange/story/0,12374,1501646,00.html
****
Feel free to dispute the groupings in any way you
can, but that "Side Two" list *are* all crackpot sites
by any definition. This one in particular is a good
primer:
http://www.environmentaldefense.org/article.cfm?contentid=4870
To quote:
"In 1998, Exxon devised a plan to stall action on
global warming. The plan was outlined in an internal
memo (see the memo as a PDF file). It promised,
"Victory will be achieved when uncertainties in climate
science become part of the conventional wisdom" for
"average citizens" and "the media."
"The company would recruit and train new scientists
who lack a "history of visibility in the climate debate"
and develop materials depicting supporters of action
to cut greenhouse gas emissions as "out of touch
with reality."
And this is a link to that Exxon memo:
http://www.environmentaldefense.org/documents/3860_GlobalClimateSciencePlanMemo.pdf
Hope this clarifies.
-BC
john fernbach
By the way, kd, I asked you several days ago if you could explain in
clear and simple English your reasons for believing that the laws of
thermodynamics somehow prove that AGW science as advanced by the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is invalid.
Since you're making essentially the same claim again, could you
possibly do us a favor by replying to my request?
I won't ask you right now to back up your claims about the immense
damage to the global climate that fixing the CO2 problem will
supposedly cause. I know different people have very different ideas on
the benefit/cost ratios of taking action now in order to reduce the
growth in global CO2 emissions, and then hopefully to reverse that
growth, so as to head off really dangerous greenhouse warming -- at
least as forecast by the IPCC folks.
Some people on the right (for example, "skeptical environmentalist"
Bjorn Lomborg) are claiming that the cost of trying to fix greenhouse
warming will exceed the benefits of doing so -- although Lomborg's book
"The Skeptical Environmentalist" does also predict that the cost of
leaving CO2 emisssions and GW untouched could amount to something like
$5 trillion over the next century.
Some people on the "Green" side of the climate debate, on the other
hand -- notably Sir Nicholas Stern, former chief economist for the
World Bank -- are claiming that the benefits of taking action on
greenhouse gas emissions greatly exceed the costs of doing so, and
predict that leaving the problem unfixed could be a real disaster for
the world economy.
I doubt that either you or I has the intellectual background to judge
Bjorn Lomborg's claims versus those of Sir Nicholas Stern -- too many
economic assumptions, etc.
But you do claim to have proof positive, based on thermodynamic
principles, that AGW as the IPCC is characterizing it is supposedly
impossible. But I know that other people in here with scientific
backgrounds have been sharply disagreeing with your thermodynamic
analysis, and I know from what I've seen of it that I can't quite
follow it.
You seem to be condensing your logic a great deal, as a lot of
scientists do, and leaving out important steps that a layman would need
to look at to tell if your argument makes any sense.
So -- to advance the clarity of this debate, and who knows, maybe to
win some converts for your side, could you explain in some detail and
in very plain English words for us laymen why your idea on AGW is
supposedly right?
And why the model of AGW held by the IPCC and the US National Academy
of Sciences and the World Meteorological Organization is supposedly
wrong?
Thanks!
___________
Roger Dewhurst
"john fernbach" <fernba...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1168132970.0...@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> So -- to advance the clarity of this debate, and who knows, maybe to
> win some converts for your side, could you explain in some detail and
> in very plain English words for us laymen why your idea on AGW is
> supposedly right?
>
> And why the model of AGW held by the IPCC and the US National Academy
> of Sciences and the World Meteorological Organization is supposedly
> wrong?
>
1. The correlation between carbon dioxide and temperature over the last 50
years is not particularly strong.
2. Much carbon dioxide data prior to WW2 has been disregarded by the AGW
supporters because it makes the carbon dioxide history since the 1880s look
pretty dubious.
3. The palaeoclimatic data supports the proposition the carbon dioxide
follows temperature rather than the reverse.
4. Mere correlation over a geologically infinitsimal period of time does not
prove causation.
5. Water vapour is a far more important greenhouse gas.
6. The effects of vegetation both in using carbon dioxide as its sole
source of organic carbon coupled with the water transfer mechanism that
plants provide and the heat needed to convert water in plants' vascular
system into water vapour appear to be almost totally disregarded.
7. The El Nino events are not adequately modelled and the deep ocean
currents and that heat transfer mechanism is also largely disregarded.
8. There are too many inputs that are not known, not understood or cannot
be expressed in the precise equations necessary for incorporation into the
numerical models.
9. The time necessary for proper calibration of any numeric model is of the
order of two complete glacial cycles.
R
BC
Roger Dewhurst wrote:
> "john fernbach" <fernba...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1168132970.0...@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > So -- to advance the clarity of this debate, and who knows, maybe to
> > win some converts for your side, could you explain in some detail and
> > in very plain English words for us laymen why your idea on AGW is
> > supposedly right?
> >
> > And why the model of AGW held by the IPCC and the US National Academy
> > of Sciences and the World Meteorological Organization is supposedly
> > wrong?
> >
>
> 1. The correlation between carbon dioxide and temperature over the last 50
> years is not particularly strong.
Ya think? See:
http://www.cmdl.noaa.gov/publications/annmeet2004/pdf_2004/tans.pdf
>
> 2. Much carbon dioxide data prior to WW2 has been disregarded by the AGW
> supporters because it makes the carbon dioxide history since the 1880s look
> pretty dubious.
See previous.
>
> 3. The palaeoclimatic data supports the proposition the carbon dioxide
> follows temperature rather than the reverse.
See: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=13
>
> 4. Mere correlation over a geologically infinitsimal period of time does not
> prove causation.
See previous.
>
> 5. Water vapour is a far more important greenhouse gas.
See: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=142
>
> 6. The effects of vegetation both in using carbon dioxide as its sole
> source of organic carbon coupled with the water transfer mechanism that
> plants provide and the heat needed to convert water in plants' vascular
> system into water vapour appear to be almost totally disregarded.
See previous.
>
> 7. The El Nino events are not adequately modelled and the deep ocean
> currents and that heat transfer mechanism is also largely disregarded.
Yeah, it's been totally ignored:
http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/tao/elnino/forecasts.html
>
> 8. There are too many inputs that are not known, not understood or cannot
> be expressed in the precise equations necessary for incorporation into the
> numerical models.
Yeah, data gathering, math and science are all so
stressful and difficult -- why bother?
>
> 9. The time necessary for proper calibration of any numeric model is of the
> order of two complete glacial cycles.
Yeah, fur sher:
http://www.aip.org/history/climate/cycles.htm
http://www.grida.no/climate/vital/02.htm
-BC
Bawana
BC wrote:
>
> Side One: with few and fast diminishing exceptions, the
> entire global scientific community:
> http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change
> http://nationalacademies.org/onpi/06072005.pdf
> http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2004/12/index/#Global
> http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/06/national-academies-synthesis-report
> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-1489955,00.html
> http://msnbc.msn.com/id/7665636
> http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686
ALL of these links fall under the heading of:
The global warming campaign is the last gasp of the thoroughly
discredited system of socialism. Follow the path down which the Al
Gores and Mikhail Gorbachev's want to lead us and you will find
yourself in a world ruled by a Marxist United Nations.
Roger Dewhurst
"BC" <call...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1168147895.2...@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
>
> Roger Dewhurst wrote:
> > "john fernbach" <fernba...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:1168132970.0...@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >
50
> > years is not particularly strong.
>
> Ya think? See:
> http://www.cmdl.noaa.gov/publications/annmeet2004/pdf_2004/tans.pdf
From that document "The correlation loses strength at longer time scales"!
>
> >
> > 2. Much carbon dioxide data prior to WW2 has been disregarded by the
AGW
> > supporters because it makes the carbon dioxide history since the 1880s
look
> > pretty dubious.
>
> See previous.
>
> >
> > 3. The palaeoclimatic data supports the proposition the carbon dioxide
> > follows temperature rather than the reverse.
>
> See: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=13
"This is an issue that is often misunderstood in the public sphere and
media, so it is worth spending some time to explain it and clarify it. At
least three careful ice core studies have shown that CO2 starts to rise
about 800 years (600-1000 years) after Antarctic temperature during glacial
terminations. These terminations are pronounced warming periods that mark
the ends of the ice ages that happen every 100,000 years or so.
Does this prove that CO2 doesn't cause global warming? The answer is no.
The reason has to do with the fact that the warmings take about 5000 years
to be complete. The lag is only 800 years. All that the lag shows is that
CO2 did not cause the first 800 years of warming, out of the 5000 year
trend. The other 4200 years of warming could in fact have been caused by
CO2, as far as we can tell from this ice core data. "
Utter bullshit!
>
> >
> > 4. Mere correlation over a geologically infinitsimal period of time does
not
> > prove causation.
>
> See previous.
See previous bullshit!
R
BC
Ahhh, I see: all scientist are socialists and not to be
trusted. Them and those durn fool In-Tie-Leck-Chewls,
and them thare books and Ed-Chew-Kation and all
those so-called Pee-Eicht-Dees that aren't worth the
paper them's are printed on -- nuttin but trouble and
not a lick of common sense, eh?
Ya think they should all be rounded and kept away
from proper, sensible, God-fearing folk?
-BC
BC
Roger Dewhurst wrote:
> "BC" <call...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1168147895.2...@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Roger Dewhurst wrote:
> > > "john fernbach" <fernba...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > news:1168132970.0...@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > >
> > > 1. The correlation between carbon dioxide and temperature over the last
> 50
> > > years is not particularly strong.
> >
> > Ya think? See:
> > http://www.cmdl.noaa.gov/publications/annmeet2004/pdf_2004/tans.pdf
>
> From that document "The correlation loses strength at longer time scales"!
Why do right wingers hate context so? Seriously.
You guys would quote individual words if you could
get away with it.
In this case, though, a slightly fuller quote goes:
"The CO2 record exhibits a striking correlation with
global temperature variations, but the correlation
loses strength on longer time scales. We attribute
quantitatively the changes in the CO2 growth rate
to the changing global emissions from fossil fuel
burning and to temperature anomalies and trends.
>
> >
> > >
> > > 2. Much carbon dioxide data prior to WW2 has been disregarded by the
> AGW
> > > supporters because it makes the carbon dioxide history since the 1880s
> look
> > > pretty dubious.
> >
> > See previous.
> >
> > >
> > > 3. The palaeoclimatic data supports the proposition the carbon dioxide
> > > follows temperature rather than the reverse.
> >
> > See: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=13
>
> "This is an issue that is often misunderstood in the public sphere and
> media, so it is worth spending some time to explain it and clarify it. At
> least three careful ice core studies have shown that CO2 starts to rise
> about 800 years (600-1000 years) after Antarctic temperature during glacial
> terminations. These terminations are pronounced warming periods that mark
> the ends of the ice ages that happen every 100,000 years or so.
>
> Does this prove that CO2 doesn't cause global warming? The answer is no.
>
> The reason has to do with the fact that the warmings take about 5000 years
> to be complete. The lag is only 800 years. All that the lag shows is that
> CO2 did not cause the first 800 years of warming, out of the 5000 year
> trend. The other 4200 years of warming could in fact have been caused by
> CO2, as far as we can tell from this ice core data. "
>
> Utter bullshit!
AKA - "Me no understand, head hurts -- make
stop, make stop..."
> >
> > >
> > > 4. Mere correlation over a geologically infinitsimal period of time does
> not
> > > prove causation.
> >
> > See previous.
>
> See previous bullshit!
You mean:
AKA - "Me no understand, head hurts -- make
stop, make stop..."
-BC
Bawana
BC wrote:
> Bawana wrote:
> > BC wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Side One: with few and fast diminishing exceptions, the
> > > entire global scientific community:
> > > http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change
> > > http://nationalacademies.org/onpi/06072005.pdf
> > > http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2004/12/index/#Global
> > > http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/06/national-academies-synthesis-report
> > > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-1489955,00.html
> > > http://msnbc.msn.com/id/7665636
> > > http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686
> >
> > ALL of these links fall under the heading of:
> >
> > The global warming campaign is the last gasp of the thoroughly
> > discredited system of socialism. Follow the path down which the Al
> > Gores and Mikhail Gorbachev's want to lead us and you will find
> > yourself in a world ruled by a Marxist United Nations.
>
> Ahhh, I see: all scientist are socialists and not to be trusted.
I never said or implied that, tard.
> Them and those durn fool In-Tie-Leck-Chewls,
> and them thare books and Ed-Chew-Kation and all
> those so-called Pee-Eicht-Dees that aren't worth the
> paper them's are printed on -- nuttin but trouble and
> not a lick of common sense, eh?
Nope, tardboy, they just have an agenda that has nothing to do with the
climate.
How could it - "climate science" isn't really a science , is it?
> Ya think they should all be rounded and kept away
> from proper, sensible, God-fearing folk?
I wouldn't hang out with a delusional fuck like you.
BC
Bawana wrote:
> BC wrote:
> > Bawana wrote:
> > > BC wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Side One: with few and fast diminishing exceptions, the
> > > > entire global scientific community:
> > > > http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686
> > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change
> > > > http://nationalacademies.org/onpi/06072005.pdf
> > > > http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2004/12/index/#Global
> > > > http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/06/national-academies-synthesis-report
> > > > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-1489955,00.html
> > > > http://msnbc.msn.com/id/7665636
> > > > http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686
> > >
> > > ALL of these links fall under the heading of:
> > >
> > > The global warming campaign is the last gasp of the thoroughly
> > > discredited system of socialism. Follow the path down which the Al
> > > Gores and Mikhail Gorbachev's want to lead us and you will find
> > > yourself in a world ruled by a Marxist United Nations.
> >
> > Ahhh, I see: all scientist are socialists and not to be trusted.
>
> I never said or implied that, tard.
"The global warming campaign is the last gasp of the
thoroughly discredited system of socialism."
There is no global warming "campaign" -- scientists
had simply found compelling evidence that human
activity is the primarly culprit for the current round of
global warming. Look at the asteroid impact theory
regarding the dinosaurs: initially many scientists were
skeptical, but with more data gathering and research,
the impact theory ended up fittting better with the
evidence than anything else. It's the exact same thing
with the idea humans-caused, or anthropogenic,
global warming.
What has happened is that corporations and their
toadying and/or B&PF (bought and paid for) right
wingers have made this into a deranged political issue.
But as I originally posted, the two sides of the global
warming "debate" come down to the entire scientific
community with few and diminishing exceptions being
on one side, and, again with extremely few exceptions,
pro-lassiez-faire, right-wing, anti-science frauds &
crackpots and their organizations, often couched in
bogus, scientific-sounding names, publications and
web sites, not to mention being funded by the likes
of ExxonMobil and Philip Morris, being on the other
side.
If you have been utter duped, as it appears to be, by
side two, that ain't nobody's problem but your own,
is it?
>
> > Them and those durn fool In-Tie-Leck-Chewls,
> > and them thare books and Ed-Chew-Kation and all
> > those so-called Pee-Eicht-Dees that aren't worth the
> > paper them's are printed on -- nuttin but trouble and
> > not a lick of common sense, eh?
>
> Nope, tardboy, they just have an agenda that has nothing to do with the
> climate.
See previous.
>
> How could it - "climate science" isn't really a science , is it?
See previous.
>
> > Ya think they should all be rounded and kept away
> > from proper, sensible, God-fearing folk?
>
> I wouldn't hang out with a delusional fuck like you.
I'm sure I'm missing out on some might fine company....
-BC
Bawana
Yep. That settles it...
> -- scientists
> had simply found compelling evidence that human
> activity is the primarly culprit for the current round of
> global warming.
And scientists think that's crap.
There ARE TWO camps.
> Look at the asteroid impact theory
> regarding the dinosaurs: initially many scientists were
> skeptical, but with more data gathering and research,
> the impact theory ended up fittting better with the
> evidence than anything else. It's the exact same thing
> with the idea humans-caused, or anthropogenic,
> global warming.
Scientists shouldn't be picking between made up stories.
> What has happened is that corporations and their
> toadying and/or B&PF (bought and paid for) right
> wingers have made this into a deranged political issue.
It's always been a political issue.
The inconvenient truth is if both sides had equal time the issue of
Global Warming would not be considered a 'done deal.'
> But as I originally posted, the two sides of the global
> warming "debate" come down to the entire scientific
> community with few and diminishing exceptions being
> on one side,
A BIG lie.
Your socialist MO is to keep repeating it as it were the truth.
What we have is a group of agenda driven scientists in cahoots with the
MSM and political guerillas, because science--real fact driven science
is propelled by experiments which can be repeated, again and again.
What are the fact driven agw scientific experiments which can be
repeated again and again?
BC
What "scientists" are you exactly referring to here?
Perhaps I can help resolve your confusion....
-BC
Bawana
The ones on the other side of the agw discussion.
> Perhaps I can help resolve your confusion....
Yeah.
With you agw cult dogma.
Right.
BC
C'mon now, cite your sources -- don't be a chicken,
arrk, parrk, parrk, parrk, arrrk... I double dawd dare
ya. I might not be that cruel (although, realistically, I
probably will be.)
-BC
Bawana
Are you saying there are no scientists who disagree with the agw
theory?
And while you're at it:
BC
Who are...?
>
> Are you saying there are no scientists who disagree with the agw
> theory?
As I mentioned already, they are in very small,
diminishing minority, and with almost no major
scientist of note, with Richard Lindzen of MIT
being the most notable. Lindzen, though, has
a lot of baggage due to financial ties to the oil
industry, and his pet "IRIS" theory on climate is
increasingly being seen as discredited among
his peers:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Richard_Lindzen
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/02/richard-lindzens-hol-testimony
>
> And while you're at it:
>
> What are the fact driven agw scientific experiments which can be
> repeated again and again?
What, you mean like these:
http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/~tk/climate_dynamics/climate_impact_webpage.html
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/greenhouse-04a.html
Now can I get some cites for your massively bizarro
opinions? Please, pretty please with CO2 on top?
-BC
Bawana
You can start here, tardboy:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Global_warming_skeptics
* Global warming controversy
* List of scientists opposing global warming consensus
* Natural Resources Stewardship Project
A
* Claude Allègre
* Bruce Anderson
B
* Sallie Baliunas
* Robert Balling
* Fred Barnes (journalist)
* Joe Barton
* Glenn Beck
* Bruno Behrend
* David Bellamy
* Tom Bethell
* Roy Blunt
* Sonja Boehmer-Christiansen
C
* Robert M. Carter
* Alan Caruba
* Ian Castles
* George V. Chilingar
* John Christy
* Ian Clark
* Climate Audit
* Cooler Heads Coalition
* Philip Cooney
* Michael Crichton
D
* John Lawrence Daly
* David Douglass
* Paul Driessen (author)
E
* Myron Ebell
F
* Friends of Science
* Michael Fumento
G
* Tim Ball
* William M. Gray
H
* Tom Harris (global warming skeptic)
* Lester Hogan
I
* Craig D. Idso
* Keith E. Idso
* Sherwood B. Idso
* Andrey Illarionov
* Jim Inhofe
J
* Zbigniew Jaworowski
* Penn Jillette
K
* William Kininmonth (meteorologist)
L
* Theodor Landscheidt
* Larry the Cable Guy
* Nigel Lawson
* David Legates
* Marcel Leroux
* Rush Limbaugh
* Richard Lindzen
* Bjørn Lomborg
M
* Ross McKitrick
* Stephen McIntyre
* Patrick Michaels
* Steven Milloy
* Forrest Mims
* Christopher Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley
M cont.
* Kary Mullis
O
* Oregon Petition
* Jane Orient
P
* Trey Parker
* Benny Peiser
* Melanie Phillips
R
* Robert E. Davis (climatologist)
* Arthur B. Robinson
S
* Michael Savage (commentator)
* James R. Schlesinger
* Peter Schwartz (writer)
* Scientific Alliance
* Frederick Seitz
* Shattered Consensus: The True State of Global Warming
* Julian Lincoln Simon
* Fred Singer
* Fred L. Smith
* Willie Soon
* Thomas Sowell
* Roy Spencer
* Mary Starrett
* Matt Stone
* John Stossel
* Philip Stott
* Brian Sussman
V
* Jan Veizer
W
* Western Fuels Association
When you're finished with that list I will provide more.
Take your time. I'm sure you'll want to address each one individually.
No way a lib-tard like you would paint with a broad brush, is there?
> > Are you saying there are no scientists who disagree with the agw
> > theory?
>
> As I mentioned already, they are in very small,
> diminishing minority, and with almost no major
> scientist of note, with Richard Lindzen of MIT
> being the most notable. Lindzen, though, has
> a lot of baggage due to financial ties to the oil
> industry, and his pet "IRIS" theory on climate is
> increasingly being seen as discredited among
> his peers:
Wikipedia seems to disagree with your cult dogma, lib-turd.
> http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Richard_Lindzen
> http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/02/richard-lindzens-hol-testimony
YAWN!!!
Left-wing globaloney.
> > And while you're at it:
> >
> > What are the fact driven agw scientific experiments which can be
> > repeated again and again?
>
> What, you mean like these:
> http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/~tk/climate_dynamics/climate_impact_webpage.html
Computer models???
Auh tardboy, the question was:
What are the fact driven agw scientific experiments which can be
repeated again and again?
> http://www.spacedaily.com/news/greenhouse-04a.html
"As the experiment has continued, we realized just how hard it is to
see what ultimately controls tree growth -- whether CO2, water or soil
nutrients," he added.
Auh tardboy, the question was:
What are the fact driven agw scientific experiments which can be
repeated again and again?
> Now can I get some cites for your massively bizarro opinions?
I have none of those, lib-tard.
But feel free to try again:
Exxon Crime Spree
> What are the fact driven agw scientific experiments which can be
> repeated again and again?
You don't know? Yet you feel qualified to comment of the subject?
Bawana
Exxon Crime Spree wrote:
> > What are the fact driven agw scientific experiments which can be
> > repeated again and again?
>
> You don't know? Yet you feel qualified to comment of the subject?
So, you can't come up with one either.
You lib-tards sure are pathetic.
BC
I didn't know Fred Barnes was scientist, or Roy Blunt,
or Rush Limbaugh, or Penn Jillette, or Michael Crichton,
or that the Western Fuels Association was a scientific
organization, or that the Cooler Heads Coalition wasn't
just right wing front organization.
>
> Take your time. I'm sure you'll want to address each one individually.
As I suspected, you have nothing to offer on the basis
of science -- you were, just like your compatriots, just
suckered into believing idiotic, anti-science crapola.
>
> No way a lib-tard like you would paint with a broad brush, is there?
>
You know, if one looks at how and where right wingers
use phrases like "lib-tard" -- it could be taken as
essentially meaning "sane person."
> > > Are you saying there are no scientists who disagree with the agw
> > > theory?
> >
> > As I mentioned already, they are in very small,
> > diminishing minority, and with almost no major
> > scientist of note, with Richard Lindzen of MIT
> > being the most notable. Lindzen, though, has
> > a lot of baggage due to financial ties to the oil
> > industry, and his pet "IRIS" theory on climate is
> > increasingly being seen as discredited among
> > his peers:
>
> Wikipedia seems to disagree with your cult dogma, lib-turd.
>
> > http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Richard_Lindzen
> > http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/02/richard-lindzens-hol-testimony
>
> YAWN!!!
> Left-wing globaloney.
All climate scientists are left wingers? I didn't know
that.
>
> > > And while you're at it:
> > >
> > > What are the fact driven agw scientific experiments which can be
> > > repeated again and again?
> >
> > What, you mean like these:
> > http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/~tk/climate_dynamics/climate_impact_webpage.html
>
> Computer models???
>
> Auh tardboy, the question was:
>
> What are the fact driven agw scientific experiments which can be
> repeated again and again?
>
> > http://www.spacedaily.com/news/greenhouse-04a.html
>
> "As the experiment has continued, we realized just how hard it is to
> see what ultimately controls tree growth -- whether CO2, water or soil
> nutrients," he added.
>
> Auh tardboy, the question was:
>
> What are the fact driven agw scientific experiments which can be
> repeated again and again?
>
> > Now can I get some cites for your massively bizarro opinions?
>
> I have none of those, lib-tard.
>
> But feel free to try again:
>
> What are the fact driven agw scientific experiments which can be
> repeated again and again?
Oh, I see -- you want an experiment where they, say, double
the CO2 level of a planet, measure what happens, and then
reduce the CO2 to half of what it was originally and then see
what happens in that case. You know, that would be a damn
fine experiment, but, um, there may be one or two logistical
problems with doing this I can think of off the top of my head...
Admit it and be man about it -- you don't have one friggin clue
about any of this stuff, do you? And that crushing empty beer
cans on your forehead would actually be better suited to your
intellectual capabilities, no?
-BC
Bawana
Yep.
"right wing front organization"
AlphaGore isn't a scientist but you'd eat the corn from his shit,
wouldn't you tardboy?
What about the rest of the list, tardboy?
Are they ALL right-wingers?
I have more when you are finished, tardboy. TAKE YOUR TIME.
> > Take your time. I'm sure you'll want to address each one individually.
Bhaaawwwwwaaawwaaaaaaa!!!!!
> As I suspected, you have nothing to offer on the basis
> of science -- you were, just like your compatriots, just
> suckered into believing idiotic, anti-science crapola.
non sequitur, tardboy.
You: What "scientists" are you exactly referring to here?
I gave you a list - deal with it, lib-turd.
Then I'll give you more names of "scientists" I am exactly referring
to.
(I do expect you to do the liberal thing - cut and run, more non
sequiturs, or the ol' liberal standard -lie.)
> > No way a lib-tard like you would paint with a broad brush, is there?
> >
>
> You know, if one looks at how and where right wingers
> use phrases like "lib-tard" -- it could be taken as
> essentially meaning "sane person."
Whatever floats your boat, lib-tard.
Words mean nothing to you lib-turds anyway.
> > > > Are you saying there are no scientists who disagree with the agw
> > > > theory?
> > >
> > > As I mentioned already, they are in very small,
> > > diminishing minority, and with almost no major
> > > scientist of note, with Richard Lindzen of MIT
> > > being the most notable. Lindzen, though, has
> > > a lot of baggage due to financial ties to the oil
> > > industry, and his pet "IRIS" theory on climate is
> > > increasingly being seen as discredited among
> > > his peers:
> >
> > Wikipedia seems to disagree with your cult dogma, lib-turd.
> >
> > > http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Richard_Lindzen
> > > http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/02/richard-lindzens-hol-testimony
> >
> > YAWN!!!
> > Left-wing globaloney.
>
> All climate scientists are left wingers? I didn't know that.
non sequitur, tardboy.
I never said or implied that.
Are you saying that "All climate scientists" are represented in those
two links?
Are you THAT delusional, lib-turd?
You can thank me at any time. It's HARD educating you braindead
lib-tards.
"Climate science" isn't really a science, is it tardboy?
Have you tried a Ouija Board?
Too complicated for you?
How 'bout an 8ball?
Only ask them yes or no questions, tardboy, and you TOO can call
yourself a "climate scientist".
> Admit it and be man about it -- you don't have one friggin clue
> about any of this stuff, do you? And that crushing empty beer
> cans on your forehead would actually be better suited to your
> intellectual capabilities, no?
Hehe.
Run along now, lib-turd.
You really need to get back to your Bush bashing.
alanm...@yahoo.com
melting glaciers before there was any measurable temperature increase,
MOST of the heat increase comes before the increase of CO2.
The other 4200 years of warming could in fact have been caused by
> CO2, as far as we can tell from this ice core data. "
So temperatures increase an additional insignificant amount with
additional CO2 after a significant heat increase prior to CO2- big
deal. "realclimate"'s explanation doesn't make any sense at all- A.
McIntire
BC
"Cooler Heads Coalition" *is* a right wing front
organization. They don't even really hide that fact:
http://www.cei.org/pages/projects.cfm
>
> AlphaGore isn't a scientist but you'd eat the corn from his shit,
> wouldn't you tardboy?
Is Gore a scientist? Did I cite him? Nope.
>
> What about the rest of the list, tardboy?
>
> Are they ALL right-wingers?
You tell me -- it's your list. But any list containing
the names of Fred Barnes, Roy Blunt, and Rush
Limbaugh is very likely liberal or even moderate.
And it's certainly not at all scientific in any manner.
But we're getting off on a tangent -- let's get back
to the basic point: where are your cites or sources
for your utterly confused notions about global
warming? Or are they actually the likes of Fred
Barnes, Roy Blunt and Rush?
-BC
Roger Dewhurst
<alanm...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1168307736....@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Not surprisingly. Realclimate is Mann's site!
R
>
BC
Did you publish a paper with this little explanation of
yours?
Here, this has prettier pictures:
http://planetforlife.com/gwarm/glob400000.html
-BC
Bawana
No, they are not.
Now get back to work, tardboy.
I'm expecting a name by name rebuttal so get off your liberal duff and
go educate yourself.
You can thank me at any time. It's HARD educating you braindead
lib-tards.
"Climate science" isn't really a science, is it tardboy?
Have you tried a Ouija Board?
Too complicated for you?
How 'bout an 8ball?
Only ask them yes or no questions, tardboy, and you TOO can call
yourself a "climate scientist".
The global warming campaign is the last gasp of the thoroughly
Exxon Crime Spree
And New Zealand Climate Assholes is an Exxon site, but you would say
that doesn't mean YOU are biased.
>
> R
> >
person
BC wrote:
> Roger Dewhurst wrote:
> > "john fernbach" <fernba...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:1168132970.0...@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > >
> > > So -- to advance the clarity of this debate, and who knows, maybe to
> > > win some converts for your side, could you explain in some detail and
> > > in very plain English words for us laymen why your idea on AGW is
> > > supposedly right?
> > >
> > > And why the model of AGW held by the IPCC and the US National Academy
> > > of Sciences and the World Meteorological Organization is supposedly
> > > wrong?
> > >
> >
> > 1. The correlation between carbon dioxide and temperature over the last 50
> > years is not particularly strong.
>
> Ya think? See:
> http://www.cmdl.noaa.gov/publications/annmeet2004/pdf_2004/tans.pdf
Its at a VOLCANO !
> >
> > 2. Much carbon dioxide data prior to WW2 has been disregarded by the AGW
> > supporters because it makes the carbon dioxide history since the 1880s look
> > pretty dubious.
>
> See previous.
>
> >
> > 3. The palaeoclimatic data supports the proposition the carbon dioxide
> > follows temperature rather than the reverse.
>
> See: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=13
>
It doesn't make any difference, because gases don't flow evenly through
the atmosphere.
Its only the past 200 years that are important.
> > 4. Mere correlation over a geologically infinitsimal period of time does not
> > prove causation.
>
It would show an "atypical" event.
>
> >
> > 5. Water vapour is a far more important greenhouse gas.
>
> See: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=142
>
This pro-GW site makes this assumption by taking out each element at a
time (not in the lab, but some synthetic process done on atmsopheric
data) - utterly bogus, they are not separated.
It also says "realtive humidity is constant" - of course, that doesn't
mean the amount of water is constant !
> > 6. The effects of vegetation both in using carbon dioxide as its sole
> > source of organic carbon coupled with the water transfer mechanism that
> > plants provide and the heat needed to convert water in plants' vascular
> > system into water vapour appear to be almost totally disregarded.
>
But vegetation will vary according to atmsopheric conditions, so it is
not relevant.
>
> >
> > 7. The El Nino events are not adequately modelled and the deep ocean
> > currents and that heat transfer mechanism is also largely disregarded.
>
> Yeah, it's been totally ignored:
> http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/tao/elnino/forecasts.html
But there may be other mechanisms for these events (which are natural
events, not caused by GW).
> >
> > 8. There are too many inputs that are not known, not understood or cannot
> > be expressed in the precise equations necessary for incorporation into the
> > numerical models.
>
> Yeah, data gathering, math and science are all so
> stressful and difficult -- why bother?
Any model is only as good as its assumptions.
BC
Let's review, shall we: I posted a list of scientific
organizations and science links showing pretty
broad scientific consensus that the current round of
global warming is human caused, and another list
of crackpots and Exxon-funded fake-ass not-quite-
scientific sites claiming that humans are not to
blame.
You claimed that "scientists think that's crap" in
regards to "awg" aka human-caused global warming.
I asked "What 'scientists' are you exactly referring
to here?"
And your response has been to dance a drunken jig
and copy & paste a list of global warming "skeptics"
list from Wikipedia, which included right-wing political
commentators and politicians, oil organizations, and
at least one comedian.
Again, what *scientists* think human-caused global
warming is "crap"?
So put up or stick a cork in it. A really big cork.
-BC
Bawana
BC wrote:
> Again, what *scientists* think human-caused global
> warming is "crap"?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_opposing_global_warming_consensus
Get to work, tardboy.
john fernbach
Bawana wrote:
> Exxon Crime Spree wrote:
>
> > > What are the fact driven agw scientific experiments which can be
> > > repeated again and again?
> >
> > You don't know? Yet you feel qualified to comment of the subject?
This is a "red herring" question.
One obvious problem with "fact-driven AGW scientific experiments" is
that we only have one Earth, and we only have one history of that
earth. And unless you have a handy time machine and a really, really
big budget, it's impossible to REPEAT the last 300 years of industrial
capitalist history, or the past 130,000 years or 300 million years of
global climate history, so as to see how things would work out if
they'd been done differently.
God maybe could do that, if there is a God, but human beings can't.
Repeatable experiments with repeatable results are extremely important
to some branches of science. But in the case of many long-term social
trends, economic trends and trends in natural phenomena, long term
experiments are often impossible to conduct. "Hey, let's do this
earthquake or economic depression over again, Earl, okay?"
The astronomers, geophysicists, geologists, ecologists, paleontologists
etc. therefore use other tools to get at truth.
Ironically, the general circulation COMPUTER MODELS that the AGW
denialists love to hate offer scientists what's probably the closest
thing to repeatable experiments in the climate field.
First you do your best to create a realistic electronic model of how
the climate functions, based on various inputs and parameters. Here we
have a box representing the ocean, there we have a box representing the
upper atmosphere, over here a third box representing the lower
atmosphere, and over here yet another box representing all of the
vegetation in the world. Over here we have another electronic variable
that represents global CO2 emissions from industry, over here we have a
variable that represents global methane emissions; here we have a
variable repressenting the sunlight that falls on the world, etc. etc.
Then you have the computer feed in different inputs to your computer
model and cranking the thing up to run, to see -- actually to SIMULATE
-- what kind of difference it makes in terms of the outcome. So you're
running "experiments" on the model that you just can't conduct in the
physical world, given the usual constraints of space and time.
And you see how these experiments work out: what would happen to
today's climate if we assumed that X, Y or Z had never happened in the
past, or had happened differently?
Or - what does the model say will happen happen to tomorrow's climate
if we assume that levels of CO2 and other greenhouse gases (methane,
etc.) change by 1%, or 2% or 3% per year for 50 years? Or whatever.
The use of statistical techniques is another way that climate
scientists try to determine what the hell is happening without being
able to back up global climate history and run it over again.
There are various statistical tests you can use to see how closely two
variables seem to vary with each other over time -- how much changes in
temperature are associated with changes in CO2 level or sunspot
activity or methane emissions or whatever, or how closely the actual
results that we get seem to correspond to what our theory had predicted
would happen, or what percentage of the variance in factor X is
explained by the variance in factor Y.
>
It's this kind of scientific reasoning that researchers on ALL sides of
the climate debate pretty much have to use to figure how trends or
non-trends in world CO2 emissions and average world temperatures and
all.
Both the AGW believers and the AGW denialists have to rely on this sort
of human or computerized "thought experiment," or on the calculation of
statistical probabilities, to get a grasp on big planetary processes
that can't easily be repeated.
If you're demanding climate experiments that can be "repeated again and
again," then, you're making a mistake about the nature of the science
we're dealing with. Or you're deliberately throwing a red herring into
the debate, so as to confuse other people.
But of course, once you accept the fact that we inevitably have to rely
on statistics, historic observations, computer models and "thought
experiments" to do most kinds of climate science - which we do! --
you can still agree or disagree with what a particular scientist is
concluding from these tools.
------
BC
So what do you have here: a Canadian "non-profit organization
made up of active and retired engineers, earth scientists and
other professionals, as well as many concerned Canadians; all
of 5 scientists worldwide who believe "the Earth is warming
but the cause is unknown," and 13 who believe that "the Earth
is warming but mostly due to natural processes."
Let's take a closer look at the credentials and credibility of
some of these folks:
Friends of Science, which thinks there is no global warming:
http://www.friendsofscience.org
Let's see...hmm, they are secretly funded by the oil industry:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Friends_of_Science
So much for their credibilty.
Let's see who's first on the "the Earth is warming but the
cause is unknown" list: Claude Allègre, a French scientist
and politician:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_All%C3%A8gre
His credentials are pretty good, but his good research days
are well behind him, and he has apparently drifted off a bit:
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/10/con-allegre-ma-non-troppo/
Let's see who's first on the "the Earth is warming but mostly
due to natural processes."
Sallie Baliunas
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=3
An astrophysicist, not an climatologist or even geologist,
expressing an opinion outside of her expertise. And she's
affiliated with several right wing organizations:
Tech Central Station
George C. Marshall Institute
Greening Earth Society
Scientific Alliance
Statistical Assessment Service
And so goes most if not all of the people in that Wikipedia
article. Here, go to this site instead and click on any of
the names for background:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Climate_change_sceptics
As I posted earlier, these guys represent the "few and
fast diminishing exceptions" to the overall consensus of
the entire global scientific community, if they aren't
simply right wingers or oil company toadies. And finding a
handful of global warming "skeptics" doesn't exactly
invalidate the vastly larger bulk of scientific opinion
and research and still growing that says otherwise.
You can find plenty of "experts" claiming that the moon
landing was staged or that it was the US that deliberately
imploded the World Trade Center towers, but that doesn't
exactly mean that makes them right.
-BC
Bawana
john fernbach wrote:
> Bawana wrote:
> > Exxon Crime Spree wrote:
> >
> > > > What are the fact driven agw scientific experiments which can be
> > > > repeated again and again?
> > >
> > > You don't know? Yet you feel qualified to comment of the subject?
>
> This is a "red herring" question.
The answer is, "there is none".
><verbiage snipped>
> Ironically, the general circulation COMPUTER MODELS that the AGW
> denialists love to hate offer scientists what's probably the closest
> thing to repeatable experiments in the climate field.
Don't you think it's pathetic that it's the best they can do?
> <verbiage snipped> Or whatever.
You finally got something correct, femmie.
It's worth repeating:
"Or whatever."
You go girl.
><verbiage snipped>
> If you're demanding climate experiments that can be "repeated again and
> again," then, you're making a mistake about the nature of the science
> we're dealing with. Or you're deliberately throwing a red herring into
> the debate, so as to confuse other people.
Nope.
No mistake about the nature of the science we're dealing with.
It's an indictment about the nature of the science we're dealing with.
> But of course, once you accept the fact that we inevitably have to rely
> on statistics, historic observations, computer models and "thought
> experiments" to do most kinds of climate science - which we do! --
> you can still agree or disagree with what a particular scientist is
> concluding from these tools.
Or we could take all the different conclusions, paste them on the
walls, blindfold a retard, spin him around ten times, and have him
throw a dart.
You fit the biil, femmie. Would you like to volunteer? Does yo' momma
let you play with darts?
That would at least be non political, unlike the "scientific consensus
of the IPCC".
The main point is:
All of your lame brained solutions to the supposed agw apocalypse are
only guesses.
Your left-wing elixirs will inevitably lead to the ol'
***The cure is worse than the disease*** syndrome.
Look at the tards in the UK throwing their money down the worthless agw
rat hole.
That's why the smartest 10% of their citizens live in OTHER countries.
Bawana
BC wrote:
> Bawana wrote:
> You can find plenty of "experts" claiming that the moon
> landing was staged or that it was the US that deliberately
> imploded the World Trade Center towers, but that doesn't
> exactly mean that makes them right.
Damn tardboy, that exactly how I feel about the despicable UN's IPCC
and the other agw consensus tards.
All of the Globaloney fanatics are repeating the same theme: global
warming is a fact attested to by the worlds scientific community, and
that it is no longer an issue but an accepted scientific fact.
That is, of course, a lot of baloney. Numerous climatologists around
the world dismiss global warming as a myth, especially the notion that
mankind is causing the globe to heat by the use of hydrocarbons and
other allegedly environmentally destructive practices.
Scores of top climatologists continue to scoff at the claims of the
global warming alarmists and deny that the matter is settled. Thanks to
a biased media, their views go unreported in the mainstream media and
many are punished by the withdrawal of the grants that support their
work. Ask renowned hurricane forecaster Dr. William Gray who has felt
the cyclone of retaliation for daring to question the reality of global
warming.
Let me know what other subjects you feel passionately about, lib-turd.
I'll most likely be on the OTHER side of those too.
Bawana
BC wrote:
> As I posted earlier, these guys represent the "few and
> fast diminishing exceptions"
**my second try - the first answer seems to have taken a wrong turn out
there**
You can repeat that lie as often as you want.
It doesn't make it true and you're certainly not convincing me.
> to the overall consensus of
> the entire global scientific community,
All of the Globaloney fanatics are repeating the same theme: global
warming is a fact attested to by the worlds scientific community, and
that it is no longer an issue but an accepted scientific fact.
That is, of course, a lot of baloney. Numerous climatologists around
the world dismiss global warming as a myth, especially the notion that
mankind is causing the globe to heat by the use of hydrocarbons s and
other allegedly environmentally destructive practices.
That flies in the face of the petition signed in April 1998 by more
than 18,000 scientists, two-thirds of whom held advanced academic
degrees and who urged the U.S. Government to reject the Kyoto Accord.
> if they aren't
> simply right wingers or oil company toadies.
Unlike the left-wing anti-American UN "consensus" toadies of the IPCC?
> And finding a
> handful of global warming "skeptics"
That's all you want to see, tardboy. No wonder you're a cult tard...
More than 17,100 basic and applied American scientists, two-thirds with
advanced degrees, have signed the Global Warming Petition.
Signers of this petition so far include 2,660 physicists,
geophysicists, climatologists, meteorologists, oceanographers, and
environmental scientists (select this link for a listing of these
individuals) who are especially well qualified to evaluate the effects
of carbon dioxide on the Earth's atmosphere and climate.
http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p357.htm
More than a handful, tardboy.
Let me guess:
They are all right-wing oil types!
OR
They have mostly gone over to the agw dark side!!!
Bhaaaawwwwwaaaawwwwaaaawwwaaaa!!!!!!!
> doesn't exactly
> invalidate the vastly larger bulk of scientific opinion
> and research and still growing that says otherwise.
Says the agw cult devotee.
Actually, tardboy, your agw house of cards is falling.
> You can find plenty of "experts" claiming that the moon
> landing was staged or that it was the US that deliberately
> imploded the World Trade Center towers, but that doesn't
> exactly mean that makes them right.
That's exactly how I feel about the UN's left-wing cult toadies of the
IPCC and the other agw cult tards.
Scores of top climatologists continue to scoff at the claims of the
global warming alarmists and deny that the matter is settled. Thanks to
a biased media, their views go unreported in the mainstream media and
many are punished by the withdrawal of the grants that support their
work. Ask renowned hurricane forecaster Dr. William Gray who has felt
the cyclone of retaliation for daring to question the reality of global
warming.
But, then again, this has nothing to do with WORTHLESS "climate
science", does it?
The global warming campaign is the last gasp of the thoroughly
discredited system of socialism. Follow the path down which the Al
Gores and Mikhail Gorbachev's want to lead us and you will find
yourself in a world ruled by a Marxist United Nations.
You really need to expand your horizons past the "handful" mantra,
tardboy.
Here are only the ABCs.
Get to work, retard.
When you're finnished with these names, we can move on to DEFs.
Liberals. Always trapped by the truth and nailed by logic.
Bhaaaawwwaaaawwwwaaaawwwaaaaaaa!!!!!
A
Earl Aagaard, PhD, Roger L Aamodt, PhD, M Robert Aaron, Ralph F Abate,
Hamed Abbas, PhD, Reza Abbaschian, PhD, Paul Abbett, Wyatt E Abbitt
III, David M Abbott Jr, Ursula K Abbott, PhD, Will S Abbott, Riaz F.
Abdulla, PhD, J M Abell, Philip H Abelson, PhD, Wayne Aben, Grady
Ables, Earl A Abrahamson, PhD, John Abrams, David Acerni, J Wayne
Achee, Hans J. Achemann, D T Achord, PhD, Ernest Achterberg, Gene
Ackerman, John R Ackerman, William Ackerman, Richard E. Ackermann,
Terry Ackman, Donald O Acrey, Lee Actor, Robert K Adair, PhD, Brian
Adam, PhD, Chris Adam, John A Adam, PhD, Adams, Arthur Adams, Brook
Adams, Charles K Adams, Craig Adams, Daniel Adams, PhD, Daniel B Adams
Jr, Dell Adams, Donald Adams, Donald S Adams, Eugene Adams, Gail D
Adams, PhD, George B Adams, PhD, Gerald J Adams, PhD, Gregory Adams,
Henry Adams, Henry Adams, Howard Adams, James W Adams, Jim Adadms, John
Adams, John E Adams, PhD, Kent A. Adams, Leonard C A Adams, PhD, Louis
W Adams, PhD, Michael P Adams, Neil Adams, PhD, Opal Adams, Peter
Adams, Phillip Adams, PhD, Richard E Adams, Richard L Adams, Robert F
Adams, Roy B Adams, Roy M Adams, PhD, Steve W Adams, Walter Adams,
William D Adams, William M Adams, PhD, William W Adams, Wilton Adams,
PhD, Wilton T Adams, PhD, Wm J Adams, George Adcock, Rusty Adcock, MD,
Lionel P Adda, PhD, Albert W Addington, Tim Addington, Bill Addison,
John K Addy, PhD, C William Ade, Albert H Adelman, PhD, Barnet R
Adelman, L A Adkins, Michael F Adkins, Ronald A Adkins, PhD, T Adkins,
Norman Adler, PhD, Lt Col Jacques J Adnet, Anthrony J Adrignolo, PhD,
Harry Adrounie, PhD, Richard A Adsero, Steven E Aeschbach, Stephen
Affleck, PhD, Siegfried Aftergut, PhD, Jack Agan, Larry D Agenbroad,
PhD, Sven Agerbek, George Aggen, PhD, Vincent Agnello, MD, Kenneth
Agnes, Mark Agnew, M C Agress, Jorge T Aguinadlo, Roy Ahalt, Robert
Aharonov, Richard Ahern, Phillip Ahlberg, Kevin Ahlborg, Mark Ahlert,
Terry Ahlquist, Mumtaz Ahmed, PhD, Rafique Ahmed, PhD, Robert Ahokas,
PhD, H W Ahrenholz, Edward Ahrens, Rolland W Ahrens, PhD, Robert M
Ahring, PhD, John J Aiello, Joseph P. Aiello, MD, S F Aiello, Phil
Aigner, Brian R Ainley, Ainsworth, Alfred Ainsworth III, E Bud
Ainsworth, Oscar R Ainsworth, PhD, S Aisenberg, PhD, David J Akers,
Linda Akers, Willie Akers, Wayne Henry Akeson, MD, Thane Akins, Korkor
Akoto, Akram, PhD, John Alai, Robert J Alaimo, PhD, Greg Alan, Vincent
M Albanese, A Henry Albaugh, Ed Alberding, Timothy A Albers, MD, Edward
Albert, Eric K Albert, PhD, Wm L Albert, James L Alberta, Mark W
Albertsen, Frank Addison Albini, PhD, D Douglas Albrecht, Robert
Albrecht, Rudolph C Albrecht, Fred R Albright, PhD, James C Albright,
PhD, Robert Lee Albright, PhD, Tad B Albright, Marcus Albro, Allwyn
Albuquerque, Ernest C Alcaraz, PhD, Garrett D Alcorn, MD, Luis Aldecoa,
Frank Alder, Ronald G Alderfer, PhD, Thomas Alderson, PhD, Bill
Aldrich, Franklin D Aldrich, PhD, Richard J Aldrich, PhD, Samuel
Aldrich, PhD, Samuel Aldrich, PhD, David Aldridge, Robert Aldridge, Wm
M Baldwin, Peter C Alecxih Sr, PhD, Russell J Alameda Jr, Perry B
Alers, PhD, Steven J Alessandro, Alex F Alessandrini, Joe Alex, Danrick
Alexander, Dave Alexander, Harold R Alexander, Ira Alexander, James F
Alexander Jr, John C Alexander, Michael L Alexander, Nelson Alexander,
Robert Alexander, Moorad Alexanian, PhD, Rex Alford, Robert Alford,
Roger C Alig, PhD, R Allahyari, PhD, Dennis Allard, Joel Alldredge,
Arly Allen, Belle Allen, Charles C Allen, Christopher G Allen, Clayton
H Allen, PhD, David Allen, PhD, Emma G Allen, PhD, Eric R Allen, PhD,
F. J. Allen, James Allen, PhD, John L Allen, Kenneth Allen, Merrill P
Allen, Mike R Allen, PhD, Pampselo Allen, Randall Allen, Robert Allen,
MD, Robert C Allen, Roger B Allen, PhD, Thomas H Allen, PhD, William
Allen, William Allen, Robert T Van Aller, PhD, Carl Allesandro,
Jonathan Alley, MD, Robt W Allgood, Ronald Alli, Craig Allison, Ronald
C Allison, MD, Terry Allison, Kevin E Allisonn, John J Allport, PhD,
Albert L Allred, PhD, Ivan D Allred Jr, Victor D Allred, PhD, Arthur W
Allsop, Gary L Allurg, MD, R A Allwein, Frank M Almeter, PhD, Richard E
Almy, Patrick Aloutto, PhD, James Aloye, Reevis S Alphin, PhD, A Frank
Alsobrook, John Alsop, PhD, Sally Alston, Charles Alt, Vincent O
Altemose, Timothy Altier, David Altman, PhD, Melvyn R Altman, PhD,
Ronny G Altman, Tracy Altman, PhD, Peter C Altner, MD, Edward E
Altshuler, PhD, Burton M Altura, PhD, Antonio Alvarez, Byron Alvey,
Vern Always, Bradley A Aman, David Saint Amand, Charles D Amata, PhD,
Charles Amateis, Ronald Amberger, PhD, Leo E Amborski, PhD, Maynard
Amdahl, Donald F Amend, PhD, Marvin E Ament, Richard Amerling, MD,
Robert C Amero, Edward J Ames III, Martin Ames, Richard Ames, MD,
Michael Amick, Duane R Amlee, A S Ammar, Moris Amon, PhD, Pierre Saiut-
Amond, PhD, Richard D Amori, Bonnie Amos, PhD, Dewey H Amos, PhD, J
Reeves Ampsco, A Amr, PhD, Desiree Armstrong, PhD, Fred Amsler, MD,
Adolph L Amundson, James Amy, Sal A Anazalone, Ernest J Andberg, G Robt
D Andborn, John Anders, MD, Donald A Andersen, PhD, Gene P Andersen,
Randall H Andersen, Terrell Andersen, PhD, Torben B Andersen, PhD,
Wilford H Andersen, PhD, A E Anderson, Allan C Anderson, Anderson,
Arthur G Anderson, PhD, Berard J Anderson, PhD, Bruce Anderson, Bruce M
Anderson, C M Anderson Jr, Carol Anderson, Chris Anderson, Cristopher
Anderson, David A Anderson, David Anderson, MD, David Anderson, David
O. Anderson, PhD, David R Anderson, PhD, Donald Hervin Anderson, PhD,
Donald N Anderson, PhD, Douglas J. Anderson, MD, Elmer Anderson, PhD,
Gerald L Anderson, Glenn L Anderson, Greg Anderson, Harrison C
Anderson, MD, HC Anderson, Ingrid Anderson, PhD, J H Anderson, James
Anderson, James Anderson, James R Anderson, James R Anderson, Janis W
Anderson, Jimmy D Anderson, Joel Anderson, John Anderson, PhD, John O
Anderson, Julia W Anderson, PhD, Keith Anderson, Ken Anderson, Kenneth
E Anderson, Kerry Anderson, Larry Anderson, PhD, Larry D Anderson, Leif
H Anderson, Lowell R Anderson, Mark A Anderson, Mary Anderson, Mitchell
Anderson, Nathan Anderson, Orson L Anderson, PhD, P Jennings Anderson,
Paul Anderson, Percy Anderson, R L Anderson, Reece B Anderson, Richard
A Anderson, PhD, Richard C Anderson, Robert E Anderson, Robt J
Anderson, MD, Roger O Anderson, Roy Anderson, Russell Anderson, Staren
D Anderson, Thomas Anderson, Thomas Anderson, PhD, Thornton Anderson,
Tom Anderson, Warren R Anderson, Deborah Anderstrom, John R Andrade,
PhD, Manuel Andrade, Ivan Andrasik, Gilbert M. Andreen, Douglas
Andress, James Andrew, James F Andrew, PhD, Lawrence L Andrew, Al
Andrews, PhD, Frederick Andrews, Harry N Andrews, John S Andrews, PhD,
Marion Andrews, Mel Andrews, Raynal W Andrews, Russell S Andrews, PhD,
Louis Andros, Mb Andrus, PhD, Alfredo Ang, PhD, Robert E Angel, Ernest
F Angelicola, Vincent Angelo, DDS, Francis M Angeloni, PhD, Steven T
Angely, Claude B Anger, Robert Angevine, Ernest Angino, PhD, Kevin P
Ankenbrand, David Arnold, Gregory Antal, Bradley C Anthanaitis, PhD,
John Anthes, PhD, Eliazbeth Anthony, PhD, Jack R Anthony, Lee S
Anthony, PhD, Robt D Anthony, Dan Antonescu-Wolf, MD, Willford
Antonson, Sanford Apfelroth, PhD, Carl Apicella, Bruce W Apland, David
R Appel, Daniel Appell, Norman Apperson, W H Appich Jr, Lynn Apple,
PhD, Robert Apple, Alan Appleby, PhD, Robert H Appleby, Donald
Applegate, DVM, Lowell N Applegate, John Applegath, Herbert S Appleman,
Morris H Aprison, PhD, Charles Apter, PhD, Richard E Apuzzo Jr, J B
Aquilla, MD, Ara Arabyan, PhD, Howard Arbaugh, Jaime Arbona-Fazzi, PhD,
John Arcadi, MD, Ed Arce, John Arch, Amber G Archer, Bill Archer, Diane
M. Archer, William Archer, Dave Archibald, Philip Archibald, Robert
Archibald, John Archie, William Ard, William Bryant Ard, PhD,
Christopher Arend, Dennis Arfmann, Harold V Argo, PhD, Guvenc Argon,
Lawrence Ariano, MD, William Arion, PhD, Z S Ariyan, PhD, Gertrude
Armbauster, PhD, Richard Armentrout, PhD, Walt Armer, Walter D Armer,
Baxter H Armstrong, PhD, Clifford Armstrong, Glenn Armstrong, James
Armstrong, James C Armstrong, PhD, Joseph C. Armstrong, PhD, Lou
Armstrong, Mark Armstrong, Marvin D Armstrong, PhD, Robert L Armstrong,
PhD, Robert Emile Arnal, PhD, Dana Arndt, Gregory Arndt, Jerome Arnett,
MD, Ross Arnett, Charles Arney, Philip J Arnholt, PhD, C Arnold,
Charles Arnold, PhD, Herbert K Arnold, John Arnold, Lance L Arnold,
Randall W Arnold, Robert Arnold Jr, DVM, Rosemary Arnold, Timothy
Arnold, Wm A Arnold, PhD, Lester C Arnwine, Casper J Aronson, Seymour
Aronson, PhD, Adrian L Arp, PhD, Charles H Arrington, PhD, Dale E
Arrington, PhD, Clement R Arrison, Jose J D Arruda, PhD, Arsate, Holly
Arterbury, Emerson O Mc Arthur III, James Arthur, PhD, Richard Arthur,
Charles G Artinian, MD, Max Artusy, PhD, A G Ash, Edward V Ashburn,
Randolph Ashby, PhD, A Ashley, PhD, Holt Ashley, PhD, Warren C Ashley,
PhD, Alvin Ashman, Jerome P Ashman, Walter R Ashwil, Walter Ashwill,
Bob Ashworth
Top Previous Next
Monroe Ashworth, Owen Ashworth, Robert Ashworth, Orv Askeland, Ann
Askew, Tom W Asmus, PhD, Winifred Alice Asprey, PhD, Mike Assad, Adel
Assaf, George Aster, R Lee Aston, PhD, Jim Atchison, Curtis L. Atchley,
Robert Aten, PhD, James Athanasion, James Athans, Robert D Athey Jr,
PhD, Robert Douglas Athey, PhD, Arthur C Atkins, John Atkinson, John P
Atkinson, MD, Larry Atkinson, Lynn Atkinson, Matt Atkinson, Stanley
Atnipp, Sharon M Attaway, Ronald Attig, Leonardo D Attorre, William J
Attwooll, Mark Atwood, PhD, Robt C Atwood, Darrel D Auch, James C
Auckland, Walter Auclair, PhD, Berk Aucoin, W H Audley, Louis A
Auerbach, Keith H Aufderheide, PhD, Wm R Aufricht, Dale Augenstein,
PhD, J Augspurger, PhD, Frederick N Aukeman, Boris Auksmann, PhD, C M
Aulick, PhD, Luther Aull, PhD, Bruce S Ault, PhD, John B Aultmann Jr,
Henry S Aurand, Richard Aurand, Alfred E Austin, PhD, Carl Fulton
Austin, PhD, D Austin, P E, Harold Austin, Michael N Austin, Robert L
Austin, Ward Austin, William H Austin, Canan Avela, William Avera,
Victor H Averbach, PhD, Mark Avereit, Jon R Averhoff, Frank Averill,
PhD, Alex Avery, Donald Avery, Michael E Avery, Philip Avery, Kenneth
Avicola, Arthur J Avila, Joseph Avruch, MD, M Friedman Axler, Mark
Axtell, William P Aycock, George L Ayer, Walton Ayer, Robert C Ayers,
PhD, Maynard F Ayler, William Aylor, John H Ayme, Bruce Ayres, T G
Ayres, Dany Ayseur, Alison M Azar, Max Azevedo
B
Bryan Baab, Dirk Den - Baars, PhD, William J Balbaris, MD, William
Babbin, Ronald R Bach, PhD, Frederick A Bacher, Henry L Bachman,
Kenneth Bachmann, PhD, Joseph Bacho, Alan Backman, David D Bacon, Drury
L Bacon, Frank R Bacon, Frederic S Bacon, J Robert Bacon, Lloyal O
Bacon, Terry Bacon, William Bacon, MD, Robert Baczuk, J Badenhoop, PhD,
Warren Badger, T Dale Badgwell, Donald L Baeder, Adrian D Baer, PhD, C
David Baer, Carl Baer, PhD, Roger Baer, Tim Baer, Edward A Baetke, AD
Baggerley, DVM, Dennis D Baggett, Lester Marchant Baggett, PhD, Jay M
Errill Bagley, PhD, Joseph A Baglio, PhD, George Bagnall, J. Brent
Bagshaw, Andrew T Bahill, PhD, Donald Bahnfleth, Donald Bahnfleth,
Andrejs Baidins, PhD, R. A. Baile, Benton Bailey, Betty L Bailey, C
Bailey, Carl Wm Bailey, PhD, D Bailey, Dana Bailey, PhD, Dane E Bailey,
David Bailey, David G Bailey, PhD, Donald T Bailey, Ed Bailey, Edmund
Bailey, MD, James Bailey, Jim Bailey, John Bailey, R V Bailey, Robert L
Bailey, PhD, Ronald M Bailey, W R Bill Bailey, Paul Bailly, PhD, James
Bain, PhD, Lee J Bain, PhD, David Bainer, Edward J Bair, PhD, James
Baird, Quincey L Baird, PhD, John Bakane, Allen Baker, PhD, Barton S
Baker, PhD, Brooks H Baker III, Carl Baker, Daniel M Baker, PhD, DK
Baker, PhD, Don Robert Baker, PhD, Gary Baker, Harold N Baker, PhD,
Howard T Baker, J Baker, PhD, Jim Baker, Joe Baker, PhD, John Baker,
John P. Baker, PhD, Lara H. Baker, PhD, Lee Baker, Lee E. Baker, PhD,
Louis Baker, PhD, Mary Ann Baker, PhD, R Baker, PhD, Randal S Baker,
Robert Baker, Robert D Baker, PhD, Robert J Baker, Robert W Baker, PhD,
Terry Baker, W J Baker, W O Baker, PhD, William Baker, Daniel M Bakker,
Lee A Balaklaw, MD, T Balance, Brent P Balcer, Marion Balcerzak, PhD,
Orville Balcom, W Loyd Balderson, PhD, W Lloyd Balderston, PhD, Andrew
A Baldoni, PhD, Leland B Baldrick, Edgar Baldridge, Ransom Baldwin,
PhD, A Richard Baldwin, PhD, Barrett S Baldwin, PhD, David Baldwin,
Evart Baldwin, PhD, Cliff Bale, George Balella, MD, R Michael Bales,
Amir Balfas, Gary Balint, Stephen J Balint, P Balis, Craig Balistrire,
Sallie Baliunas, PhD, Bruno Balke, MD, Frederic M Ball, MD, George
Ball, J Austin Ball, MD, Mark Ball, Rayford Ball, PhD, Joseph
Ballantyne, PhD, Charels L Ballard, David W Ballard, Glenn A Ballard,
Harold N Ballard, Ollie Ballard, Arthur Ballato, PhD, B. Balle, MD,
Greg Ballengee, Robert Balling, PhD, Carter Ballinger, MD, Walter E
Ballinger, PhD, Tom Ballou Jr, Martin Balow, Robert C Balsam Jr, James
Baltar, Arden A Baltensperger, PhD, Judy Balthazor, John S Baltutis,
Carole Baltz, John Banchetti, Bruce A Bancroft, PhD, Daniel W Bancroft,
George P Bancroft, Lewis C Bancroft, Herman Wm Bandel, PhD, Tom Bane,
Debendranath Banerjee, PhD, Richard Banham, Kernan M Banker, Kernen
Banker, Cezar Banks, Kerry Eubanks, Randall A Banks, Richard Banks,
Willard Banman, Lloyd H Banning, Peter R Bannister, William Bannister,
PhD, C S Banquer, Harry Bantham, James W Bantham, Ronald E Banuk, John
Paul Barach, PhD, Ronald Barany, PhD, Zot Barazzotto, Bill Barbee, Ted
R Barben I I, Anslem H Barber Jr, Art Barber, George A Barber, George
Barber, Paul Barber, Paul Barbieri, James Barcikowski, Chloeteele
Barclay, Charleton C Bard, PhD, Walter M Barden, Robert A Bardo, Chad J
Bardone, Andrew M Bardos, Charles E Bardsley, PhD, Steven Bardwell,
PhD, Morrie Jay Barembaum, Ernest Barenberg, PhD, Charles Barenfanger,
David E Barensfeld, Mark J Bareta, Laurie Barfield, Thomas Barfnecht,
PhD, L R Baria, Robert Barish, PhD, Francis J Barker, Frank Barker,
Franklin B Barker, PhD, Horace A Barker, PhD, Larry D Barker, Leroy N.
Barker, PhD, Roy J Barker, PhD, Steve Barker, Dwight G Barkley, PhD,
John E Barkley, PhD, Neal Barkley, B Barks, PhD, Alan A. Barksdale,
William B. Barksdale, PhD, R Michael Barland, MD, Mario Barletta,
Anthony Barlow, PhD, Mark Owens Barlow, W S Barlow, Wayne Barlow, Alex
Barlowen, Douglas D Barman, Audrey F. Barmore, William Barmore, Charles
Barnard, John Barnard, Tom Barnard, Allen L Barnes, PhD, Durton B
Barnes, M D Barnes, PhD, Ralph M Barnes, Richard Barnes, Robert F
Barnes, PhD, Stephen W Barnes, L Bruce Barnett, PhD, R C Barnett, Ralph
Barnett, Robert Barnett, William J Barnett, John Barney, Debra
Barngrover, PhD, James R Barnum, PhD, Charles J Baroczy, Jeremiah A
Barondess, MD, Louis J Barone, Barquist, MD, Walter Barquist, MD,
Douglas Barr, Kenneth Barr, Lawrence D Barr, Rosemary Barr, Carrol M
Barrack, PhD, Kenneth H Barratt, Clem A Barrere, PhD, C Barrett,
Christopher M Barrett, Helen Barrett, Kenneth A Barrett, Mrs Carol A
Barrett, Wallace H Barrett, James Barrick, PhD, Leland Barrington,
Allen Barron, Cory W Barron, Donald Barron, Lance R Barron, Oscar N
Barron, Lawrence J Barrows, PhD, Benjamin A Barry, Joel Barry, John L
Barry, Todd R Bart, Robert Bartak, John Bartel, PhD, J H Barten, Eugene
Barth, Jon Barth, Merlin J Barth, Maria V Bartha, Cristina Barthle,
Jack Bartholmai, MD, Howard Bartlett, B Bartley, PhD, Gary Bartley,
Carol J Bartnick, PhD, Charles J Barto Jr, Clyde Barton Jr, Hugh B
Barton, Larry R Barton, Richard C Barton, Jerry Bartos, Robert J
Bartosh Jr, William P Bartow, David L Bartsch, Blaine Bartz, Don Bartz,
Bratzatt, PhD, Edward J Barvick, MD, David T Basden, Cecil O Basenberg,
Mark Basile, John Basinski, PhD, George Baskin, Alex Baskous, MD, Jim
Basnik, John W Bass, MD, Jonathan Langer Bass, PhD, Steven Craig Bass,
PhD, Alton Herman Bassett, Mark J Bassett, PhD, Don Bassler, David
Batchelder, Robert L Batdorf, PhD, Samuel Batdorf, PhD, Richard L Bate,
James Bateman, James L Bateman, Carl Bates, PhD, Charles C Bates, PhD,
Charles C Bates, PhD, Earl Bates, Lynn S Bates, PhD, Andy Batey, PhD,
Robert W Batey, Terry E Batlalino, Kevin Batt, Albert Batten, PhD,
George Batten, PhD, Joe Battista, Sam Battista, PhD, Jack Battle,
Willis R Battles, Kirk Battleson, PhD, Joseph Battocletti, PhD, Richard
Baubles, E Baudoin, Armand Bauer, PhD, Carl A Bauer, PhD, Ceo E. Bauer,
David Bauer, Kerry E Bauer, Larry G Bauer, PhD, Mark S Bauer, Michael H
Bauer Jr, Milton C Bauer, DVM, Paul Bauer, PhD, Thomas Bauer,
Bauermeister, T Mack Baugh, George L Baughman, Joseph H Baum, PhD, Kurt
Baum, PhD, Linda L Baum, PhD, Wolfgang Baum, PhD, Thomas P Baumgarth,
John W Bauman, PhD, Rick Bauman, Robert Bauman, Arthur N Baumann,
Norman P Baumann, PhD, Steve Baumann, Wolfgang Baumann, PhD, Lisa L
Baumbach, PhD, Sandra R Baumberger, Max Baumeister, Jim Baumer, PhD,
Kenneth Baumert, PhD, A W Baumgartner, AZ Baumgartner, Eric
Baumgartner, Peter Bausch, Gerhard Baut, Monte Paul Bawden, PhD, Kirby
Bayerle, John G Bayless, Robert L Bayless Jr, Robt Bayless, Steve
Bayless, Frank Bazzanella, Joe Bazzelle, Charles Beach, Dwight Beach
Jr, Gordon Beaham, A Beal, Jack W Beal, PhD, Mark Beal, Edward W Beall,
Gary Beall, PhD, Herbert Beall, PhD, James M Beall, Paula T Beall, PhD,
Samuel E Beall, Terry W. Beall, Brian Bean, Sam Bean, Arthur L. Bear,
Marshall Bearce, James B Beard, PhD, N. Gerald Beard, Thomas Beard,
Scott Beardemphl, Carl Bearden, Henry J Bearden, PhD, Wm Beardmore,
PhD, Melville W Beardsley, Carl Beark, Charles Bearse III, Reginald H
Bearsley, Donald Beasley, PhD, Wayne M Beasley, William Beaton, James
Beattie, PhD, Ken Beatty, Christine B. Beaucage, PhD, David Beaucage,
PhD, Robert Beauchamp, Robert A Beaudet, PhD, Charles G Beaudette,
James H M Beaudry, Edward A Beaumont, Frank Beaumont, Lee Beaumont,
Dennis Beaver, Harold Beaver, Paul Becher, PhD, Richard Becherer, PhD,
Gayle D Bechtold, Bill Beck, Craig A Beck, Curt B Beck, Curt B U Beck,
Curtis Beck, David Beck, Donald Beck, Douglas B Beck, Lloyd Beck, Niels
Beck, PhD, Tom G Beck, William Beck, Willie Beck, A D Beckerdite,
Clarence Becker, PhD, Don Becker, Ernest I Becker, Gordon E Becker,
PhD, Harry C Becker, PhD, John C Becker, Louis S Becker, Milton Becker,
PhD, Ralph Sherman Becker, PhD, Robert P Becker, PhD, Robert S Becker,
PhD, Wilbur Becker, Sidney D Beckett, PhD, Roger H Beckham, Arnold
Beckman, PhD, Joseph A Beckman, PhD, Kermit R Beckmann, David Beckner,
Merrill Beckstead, PhD, Scott Beckstrand, Thoams Becnel, Charles
Bedell, Glenn Bedell, PhD, Rowland Bedell, Thomas E Bedell, PhD,
Kenneth L Bedford, PhD, Tom Bedford, Phillip Bednarek, William C
Bedoit, PhD, Curtis M Beechan, PhD, Brian Beecken, PhD, Scott K Beegle,
Giselle Beeker, Kenneth Beeney, Tom Beer, David Beerbower, Edward Lee
Beeson, Jr, PhD, Mark Beget, Mark Beget, H Dale Beggs, PhD, O Beggs,
Jana Begor, Nicholas Begovich, PhD, Francis J Behal, PhD, Pat Behm,
Wallace B Behnke, Buriel A Behrens, Greg P Behrens, Herbert Ernest
Behrens, Richard Behrens, PhD, John Behun, PhD, Rudi Beichel, Alan
Beiderman, Henry Beilstein, PhD, Arthur B Reindorff, PhD, Walter F
Beineke, PhD, Carl A Beiser, PhD, John Beitia, Paul Bekarik, Ihor
Bekersky, PhD, Gary L Beland, Orris D Belanger, Abdeldjelil Belarbi,
PhD
Top Previous Next
Kevin P Belcher, Ralph Belcher, PhD, Curtis Belden, Dan Beldy, Leo T
Belill, Bruce Bell, PhD, C Allen Bell, Charles Bell, PhD, Gregory Bell,
James M Bell, Jeffrey Bell, John Bell, PhD, John Bell, Linda S Bell,
Mark R Bell, PhD, Robert Bell, Stephen W Bell, Thomas Bell, DVM,
Wallace Bell, PhD, William Bell Jr, Zeb Bell, John C Bellamy, PhD,
Joseph S Bellassai, Thomas E Bellinger, Robert Bellino, MD, Wade
Bellon, Robert A Bellows, PhD, Daniel T Belmont, PhD, Stephen Belmont,
PhD, Lawrence C Belnoski, E F Belohoubek, PhD, Randy Belstad, Delfin
Beltran, MD, James Noble Bemiller, PhD, Paraskevi M Bemiller, PhD, John
Ben, Robert D Benbow, Edward Benchik, Raymond L Bendure, PhD, Rudolf J
Beneda, James H Benedict, PhD, Rettig Benedict, PhD, James F Benedum,
James Benegne Jr, MD, David Benforado, Ashley Bengali, PhD, Ray Benge,
Ford Benham, Carol Benhemdorf, H W Benischek, James A Benjamin, PhD,
John Benjamin, PhD, Robert Benjamin, Michael Benkert, William Benne,
PhD, Albert G Bennett Jr, PhD, Bennett, Charles Bennett, Donald W
Bennett, Douglas A Bennett, G Bennett, PhD, Harold E. Bennett, PhD,
John Bennett, MD, Joseph Bennett, RS Bennett, Thomas C Bennett, William
W Bennett, John Bennetts, Paul A Bennington, Allan Bennison, Sharon
Beniot, Alvin K Benson, PhD, Andrew A Benson, PhD, Fred C Benson, PhD,
Gordon Benson, MD, Harold Benson, John D Benson, Robert Benson, Roger
Benson, Sidney W Benson, PhD, William Benson, Ray Bentall, Jack
Bentley, Jack C. Bentley, Kenton E Bentley, PhD, Allen W Benton, PhD,
Wesley G Bentrude, PhD, Charles M Bentzen, Bernard D Benz, Edward J
Benz, MD, Robert Benz, George Benzing, MD, Ray A Berard, PhD, John A
Berberet, PhD, William Berberich, Warren Berce, E Paul Bercegeay, PhD,
Hugh Berckmueller, MD, Andrew Berg, Edgard L Berg, J Berg, PhD,
Laurence C Berg, MD, Ronald Berg, Louis Bergdahl, Maxmimilian H
Bergendahl, PhD, Alan Berger, MD, Brian Berger, MD, Jay M Berger, PhD,
Lev Berger, PhD, Louis Berger, Louis Berger, Otto Berger, Roger Berger,
T F Berger, Arne Bergh, PhD, C. B. Bergin, Marion J Bergin, Ernest
Bergman, Oswald R Bergmann, PhD, Warren C Bergmann, Dick Bergren, PhD,
Mike Bergsmg, Rod Bergstedt, Robt Beringer, PhD, Robert Berkebile, MD,
Donald C Berkey, Eric N Berkhimer, Dan Berkman, Willima Berks, Leland
Berkwits, MD, John J Berky, PhD, David T Berlin, Brian Berman, Elliot
Berman, PhD, Marshall Berman, PhD, Curtis L Bermel, John Wilfrid
Bernard, Louis Bernath, PhD, Richard Bernhard, Andre Bernier, Warren W
Berning, Joseph Bernstein, MD, Kenneth Bernstein, Julius R Berreth,
Dave Berrier, Lester P Berriman, Dan Berry, Dan Berry, Edwin Berry,
PhD, Edwin Berry, PhD, Herbert W Berry, PhD, James W Berry, PhD, Robert
W Berry, PhD, Roy A Berry, PhD, William Berry, John R Berryhill, PhD,
Charles F Bersch, M Bersch, PhD, Arthur Bershman, Albert C Bersticker,
Charles W Bert, PhD, Allen J Bertagne, Robert G Bertagne, Bruce I
Bertelsen, Kevin Bertermann, Siegfried R Berthelsford, MD, Frances
Berting, PhD, Robert L Bertram, B. Rodney Bertramson, PhD, Bertrand,
Rodney A Bertsch, Arlen D Besel, Kurt Von Besser, PhD, Robert Bessette,
Robert Best, PhD, Robert C Beste, David U. Betcha, Arthur F Betchart,
Jack Bethards, Robert K Bethel, Peter Bethell, Art L Bethke, PhD,
Nedavia Bethlahmy, PhD, Harry E Betsill, George W Bettge, John
Bettinger, MD, Andrew Betts, Austin Betts, Austin W Betts, Ernest
Beutler, MD, Rowland S Bevans, PhD, Vladislav Bevc, PhD, Robert
Beverly, Vicky L Bevilacqua, PhD, Vincent D Bevill, Albert J Bevolo,
PhD, Cecil Bewner, John H Beyer, PhD, James Beyl, Peter R Beythen, MD,
Rahul Bhaduri, Maneesh Bhatnagar, Swapan Bhattacharjee, PhD, Debanshu
Bhattacharya, PhD, John M Biancardi, Peter Bianchetta, Kenneth L Del
Bianco, Philip Bias, Vic Biazis, William R Bibb, PhD, George Bibel,
PhD, Conrad Biber, PhD, Edward G Bich, Peter B Eichelberger, Hans
Bichsel, PhD, Michael D Bick, PhD, Rudolf Bickel, MD, William S Bickel,
PhD, Arden Bicker, Karin Bickford, Lewis J Bicking Jr, Ervin F Bickley
Jr, William E Bickley, Donald Bickmore, A W Bickner Sr, John H. Biddle,
Rh Biddle, Jean M Bidlace, PhD, Lawrence R Bidwell, PhD, Charles
Bieber, John Bieber, Kenneth Bielat, PhD, Yan Bielek, Gregg Bierei,
Theo Karl Bierlein, PhD, J Bierman, Joseph F Bieron, PhD, Jerry N.
Biery, Doug N Biewitt, Jean M Bigaouette, Bigelow, PhD, John E Bigelow,
Donald Bigg, PhD, James Biggs, PhD, R Dale Biggs, PhD, Rodney E Bigler,
PhD, Arthur Bigley, William Bihrle, Dean Bilden, Keith Bildstein, PhD,
John M Bilhorn, PhD, John D Shaylor- Billings, David L Billingsley Jr,
Dan A Billman, George E Billman, PhD, Billones, D G Bills, PhD, John L
Bills, PhD, Larry Bilodeau, Edward G Bilpuch, PhD, Robt Bilski, Jack
Binford, Arthur Bing, PhD, Billy E Bingham, PhD, Nancy L Bigham, Lisa
Binkley, Dan Binning, Layton C Binon, R L Binsley, William Bintzer,
Michael Binzer, Biolchini, Frank S Riordan, PhD, Matthew C Birch,
Michael A Birch, Norman Birch, M J Birck, Charles F Bird, Chris M Bird,
Kenneth Bird, PhD, Peter Bird, E. F. Birdsall, PhD, Carmel Birdwell,
Jack Birk, Wm Birkemeier, PhD, Kathleen Biros, Seymour Bristein,
William Bisbing, Alfred F Bischoff, James L Bischoff, PhD, James M
Bisett, Gerald E Bisgard, PhD, Amin Bishara, Bob Bishop, David Bishop,
Dennis W Bishop, Floyd Bishop, George D Bishop, Guy W Bishop, PhD, John
W Bishop, PhD, Marshall D Bishop, Raymond Bishop, Richard E Bishop,
Richard H Bishop, PhD, Richard S Bishop, PhD, Larry Bisimmers, Kenneth
Bisson, MD, J L Bitner, James Bitner, Joseph Bitsock, MD, Burt J
Bittner, Walter E Bixby, Benny Bixenman, John Bixler, Thomas Bjerke,
Charles Black, PhD, Charles E Black, Darvil Black, PhD, Dean Black,
PhD, Dennis Black, Don Black, Donald E Black, Horlod Black, James R.
Black, John S Black, Larry Black, Sammy M Black, Timothy Black, Tom
Black, Wesley F Black, William Black, Albert W Blackburn, Brian D
Blackburn, Jon Blackburn, Larry G Blackburn, Lloyd Blackburn, Clinton R
Blackmon, James Blackmon, Jerry M Blackmon, Perry Blackstock, M L
Blackwell, Eli W. Blaha, PhD, R G Blain, Alex Blaine, Blair, PhD,
Charles M Blair, Edward Blair, Helen Blair, Katherine Blair, Leon F.
Blair, Luther Blair, Mr Barry Blair, Paul V Blair, PhD, Bruce A Blake,
George R Blake, PhD, Rolland L Blake, PhD, J Warren Blaker, PhD, Robert
B Blakestad, Francis Blanc, Dave Blanchard, Doug Blanchard, Donald W
Blancher, Lorraine T Blanck, C Dudley Blancke, William M Bland Jr,
Philip J Blank, PhD, Robert Blanke, PhD, Dav Blankenhagen, John
Blankenhorn, James Blankenship, Ron J Blanton, William Edward Blase,
Nik Blaser, John Blasing, John R Blasing, Barbara Blass, PhD, Joel J
Blatt, PhD, Robert C Blatz, Henry H Blau, PhD, Clyde Blauer, George A
Blay, PhD, Stephen Blaylock, Gilbert K Bleck, Douglas Bledsoe, Larry J
Bledsoe, W N Bledsoe, Sheldon J Bleicher, MD, Rodney Bleifuss, PhD,
Carl Bleil, PhD, William Bleimeister, Daryl A Blessing, John Blethen,
PhD, Robt E Blevins, Zegmund O Bleviss, PhD, Wm Blew, Charles William
Blewett, PhD, David Blewett, Edward Blick, PhD, Victor J Bliden, PhD,
Brian Bliss, Warren M Bliss, C James Blom, PhD, C R Blomberg, William
Blomdahl, Duane Bloom, PhD, James A Bloom, George L Bloomsburg, PhD,
Joe Bloomsburg, Stan Blossom, William V Bluck, James W Blue, PhD, M D
Blue, PhD, Claire Bluestein, PhD, Aaron L Bluhm, PhD, Harold F Bluhm,
Eugene Blum, Fred G. Blum, MD, John Blum, M Blumenberg, PhD, Naoma
Blumer, G Bluzas, G. W. Elvernum, David L Bnalinski, Thomas A Boardley,
Warren P Boardman, Joshua T Boatwright, John G Bobak, David A Bobaugh,
Robert S Bobbitt, Jack E Bobek, Thomas C Boberg, PhD, Thomas M Bobik,
Sergey Boblcov, Terry Bobo, Charles Bocage, Dave Bocchini, Fred Bock,
PhD, Gene Bock, Jane Bock, PhD, Richard F Bock, Wayne D Bock, PhD, Gary
Bockus, Bohdan Boczkaj, PhD, Stephen J Bodar, PhD, David E Boddy, PhD,
Arthur P Bode, PhD, Loren E Bode, PhD, Kenneth Bodek, MD, Robert Boden,
George Boder, Donald D Bodewig Jr, S Bodily, PhD, Larry P Bodin, Frank
T Bodurtha, PhD, Willard A Bodwell, Marvin Boedeker, Carl R Boehane,
Robert J Boehle, Frank R Boehm, Carl R. Boehme, Hollis Boehme, PhD,
Eldron Boehmer, John Boehune, Howard Boeing, J Robert Boen, Jack E
Boers, PhD, David H Boes, Philip D Bogdonoff, PhD, J Neil Boger, MD,
Colleen Boggs, Johnny Boggs, Steven A Boggs, PhD, Leslie K Bogle,
Seymour M. Bogdonoff, Kevin M Bohacs, PhD, Barry Bohannon, John
Bohannon, Joseph Terril Bohanon, PhD, Carl Bohl, PhD, Richard A
Bohling, James Bohn, William M Bohon, Kees Boi, PhD, Norman R Boisse,
PhD, Charles E Boklage, PhD, Art F Boland, Jonathan Boland, Mike
Boland, Paul W Boldt, Regnald A Boles, M S Boley, PhD, Mark S Boley,
Mark S Boley, Nicholas C Bolgiano, PhD, Dean Bolick, John N Bolin,
Gerald L Bolingbroke, PhD, Harry J Boll, PhD, Eugene Bollay, Paul V.
Bollerman, Bruce Bollermann, Clay B Bollin, Edward H Bollinger, PhD, A
Bollmeier
Top Previous Next
Robert L Bolmer, Gerald J Bologna, Sam Bolognia, Carole Boltz, James
Boltz, Kelsey Boltz, Sam Boltz, Dudley Bolyard, E Arthur Bolz, MD, H
Joel Boman III, Jerry C Bommer, PhD, Blair Bona, PhD, Brad Bona, Glenn
Bonacum, MD, Patrick L Bond, Stephon T Bond, PhD, Victor Bond, PhD,
Walter D Bond, PhD, William Bond, James M Bondi, Terry Bonds, J R Bone,
Susan Boner, Lee Bongirno, Lawrence P Bonicatto, L P Bonifaci, Anthony
Bonner, PhD, Charles M Bonner, John Franklin Bonner, PhD, Marlowe
Bonner, G Wayne Bonsell, Patrick V Bonsignore, PhD, Lewis Book, Raymond
Book, Stephen A Book, PhD, Arnold B Booker, Jane M Booker, PhD, Noel
Booker, Jerry L Boom, PhD, R J Boomex, Daniel R. Boone, Deidre Boone,
Jack Boone, PhD, James Boone, PhD, Paul Boonen, PhD, Warren J Boord,
Lawrence E. Boos, PhD, Arthur Booth, MD, Arthur S Booth Jr, MD, Bruce L
Booth, PhD, David Booth, PhD, Richard Booth, Robt M Booth, E M Boothe,
Jay M Bopp, Hamid Borazjani, PhD, Samia Borchers, MD, Bordeaux, PhD,
Adam Bordelon, Charles Borden, Robert Borden, MD, L Bordenave, Stuart
Boreen, J B Boren, PhD, Katarina Borer, PhD, Robert Borg, Frank R
Borger, Philip Borgerding, Jerry Borges, Dan Borgnaes, PhD, W K
Borgsmiller, MD, John W Boring, PhD, John A. Bork, Walter A Bork, Alex
B Borkovec, PhD, Annette H Borkowski, Manfred Borks, PhD, Harold J
Born, PhD, William Bornhorst, Robert C Bornmann, MD, Raul H Borrastero,
David Borrownam, Borsari, Hanid Boruzzi, Theodore Bos, PhD, Randal S
Bose, Benjamin A Bosher, Ronald Boshista, William E Bosken, Robert
Bosler, Bosnak, Kenneth J Boss, PhD, Paul N Bossart, Peter B Bosserman,
Robert Bosshart, PhD, Thomas Bossler, Robert Bossung, Howard Bost, PhD,
Keith A Bostian, PhD, Steve Boswell, Steven T Boswell, William
Bosworth, Askel A Bothner By, PhD, John N. Botkin, CJF Bottcher, PhD,
Margurette E Bottje, PhD, William G Bottjer, Edmond M Bottorff, PhD,
Truman A Botts, PhD, Geo I Bouadiieff, Jeffrey A Boucher, Michel
Boudart, PhD, John H Boughton, PhD, John Boulet, MD, George Boulter,
Robert L Boulware, Arnold H Bouma, PhD, Robert H Bourke, PhD, M N
Golarz De Bourne, PhD, Sara Bouse, Mohamed Boutjdir, PhD, Harvey B
Boutwell, R K Boutwell, PhD, Gerardus D Bouw, PhD, George S Bovis, Gary
Bovyer, Rl Bowden, Anthony J Bowdler, PhD, Joseph C Bowe, PhD, David
Bowen, H Kent Bowen, PhD, John T Bowen, Peter F Bowen, Richard Bowen,
Richard D Bowen, Charles A Bower, PhD, John Roy Bower, PhD, Leonard
Bower, PhD, Richard Bowerman, Christopher Bowers, Clarence Bowers, John
Bowers, Larry Q Bowers, Robert C Bowers, Roger L Bowers, Susan H
Bowers, MD, Sydney Bowers, Sidney A Bowhill, PhD, Robert M Bowie, PhD,
Jean A Bowles, PhD, Kaydell C Bowles, Lamar D Bowles, Floyd E Bowling,
Robert E Bowling, PhD, William Bowlus, MD, Charles Bowman, Harry
Bowman, Harry G. Bowman, James L Bowman, Jan Bowman, John K Bowman,
Lewis W Bowman, PhD, Marie Bowman, R Bowman, Robert S Bowman, PhD,
Norman Bowne, Colin Bowness, PhD, Samuel Bowser, PhD, B W Box, James E
Box, PhD, Roger Box, Chris M. Boxell, MD, Michael Boxer, MD, Kevin
Boyack, PhD, Robert E Boyar, Boyatt, Boyyce, Graybeal & Sayre, Inc,
David Boyce, John T Boyce, Wilson E Boyce, Frederick Mervin Boyd, PhD,
J T Boyd, James Boyd, Jimmy W Boyd, John F Boyd, Philip A Boyd, PhD,
Richard Boyd, Robert Boyd Iii, Timothy M Boyd, Willis Boyd, Gary Boyer,
Lance Boyer, Paul S Boyer, PhD, Robert A Boyer, PhD, Robert E Boyer,
PhD, Wm D Boyer, PhD, James A Boyes, Ralph L. Boyes, T M Boyett, Ben
Boykin, Dave Boykin, John F Boyle, MD, Patrick Boyle, Richard J Boyle,
John Boyles, MD, Bozlee, PhD, Ben Brabb, PhD, Dennis Brabec, Paige
Bracci, John D Brack, Sherry L. Brackeen, Barth Bracken, Brett K
Bracken, Robert G Brackett, PhD, David Brackney, Dorothy L Bradbury,
James Bradbury, J Tj Braddock, Joseph U Braddock, PhD, Shawn Braden,
Lawrence G Bradford, PhD, William C Bradford, Andrew N. Bradley, MD,
Bruce Bradley, John Bradley, MD, Michael Bradley, Robert F Bradley,
PhD, Robert S Bradley, William E Bradley, Charles Bradshaw, MD, George
Bradshaw, Jerry A Bradshaw, Matin D Bradshaw, PhD, Samuel Bradshaw, W
Newman Bradshaw, PhD, Derek Bradstreet, R Bradt, PhD, Bob Brady, John R
Brady, Matthew E Brady, Robert Brady, S D Brady III, Samuel B Brady,
Tom Brady, PhD, William Brady, DDS, William Brady, William J Brady, MD,
Douglas G Braid, Alan D Brailsford, PhD, Arthur Van De Brake, Fred W
Brakebusch, J C Brakensieck, Eric M Bram, David Brambury, Kenneth A
Brame, Michael Bramwell, Erwin F Branahl, Emanuel L Brancato, Cynthia R
Branch, Thomas Brandlein, Patrick J Brandner, MD, Stewart Brandon,
Edward N Brandt, MD, Robert Brandt, Robert Brandt, Thomas Brandt,
William Brandt, PhD, William L Brandt, Alan D Branham, M Branman,
Raymond Brannan, PhD, Mike Brannen, Ross E Brannian, Carl F Branson,
Albert W Brant, PhD, Charles W Brant, Glenn S Brant, Wm W Brant, Susan
Brantley, Webb E Braselton, PhD, Bradley A Brasfield, John F Brass,
George Bratton, PhD, Charles Bratzrus, Richard H Braumlich, David
Braun, Jeffrey M Braun, Jennifer Braun, Kenneth Martin Brauner, PhD,
Allan Brause, PhD, Johnny A Brawner, MD, Thoams Braxtan, MD, Ben Bray,
PhD, Carl W. Bray, Bruce G Bray, PhD, William H Bray, MD, James F
Brayton, PhD, James P Brazel, William Breach, Carl L Breaux, Ernest
Breaux, Russell W Breaux, Theodore Breaux, Lee Brecher, PhD, Robert L
Breckenridge, MD, Claude E Breed, Townsend Breeden, James Breeding,
Larry Breeding, Reginald Breeding, Bertram V Breemen, William M Breene,
PhD, Sydney Breese, Bob Breeze, Martin Bregman, PhD, E J Bregmann,
William R Breher, William R Breher, John E Brehm Sr, B M Breining, C H
Breitenfelder, Richard Breitling, Thomas O Breitling, Ted Breitmayer, A
C Breller, James Breman, Bart J Bremmer, David L Brenda, William
Breneman, Alan S. Brengle, Arthur Brennan, Harold Brennan, John P
Brennan, Michael J Brennan, MD, William J Brennan, Ronald G Brenneman,
Abner Brenner, PhD, Henry W Brenniman Jr, J Allen Brent, PhD, Paul D
Brent, William B Brent, PhD, Frederick Breslin, PhD, John H Bress, M N
Bressler, Pe, Inc, Joseph Breston, PhD, William A Brett, Kurt
Bretterbauer, Randolph H Bretton, PhD, Harold W Bretz, PhD, Andrew J
Breuder, MD, Charles B Breuer, PhD, Jerald Brevick, PhD, James
Brewbaker, PhD, Clyde Brewer, Doug Brewer, Gregory J Brewer, PhD,
Herbert L Brewer, J R Brewer, Ken N Brewer, Michael Brewer, Walter B
Brewer, Doug Brewster, Robert N Brey, Robt N Brey, PhD, Edward Breyere,
PhD, Darlene R Brezinski, PhD, P L Thibaut Brian, PhD, Alan G Bridge,
PhD, Lindell Bridges, Luther W. Bridges, PhD, P M Bridges, Robert M
Bridges, Andrew Briedenbach, Claudia Briell, Brian O Brien, Corale L
Brierley, PhD, David A Brierley, James A Brierley, PhD, Arthur R
Briggs, Edward M Briggs, James E Briggs, PhD, Mike Briggs, Mrs R O
Briggs, Robert O Briggs, Steve Briggs, PhD, W Briggs, PhD, Robert B
Brigham, Mont J Bright Jr, Karen Brignac, Mike Brignac, Tom Brignac,
Bruce Edwin Briley, PhD, Karl Briley, Frank Brimelow, Clifton Briner,
Allan Briney, MD, Robert Bringer, PhD, Donald F Brink, PhD, Edwin C
Brinker, George W Brinker, Sandra Brinker, Tyler Brinker, Larry K
Brinkman, MD, Raymond S Brinkmey, PhD, Michael Brinkmeyer, James
Brinks, PhD, Thomas R Brinner, PhD, Richard K Brinton, Charles Des
Brisay, R. Brisbin, Anne M Briscoe, PhD, James Briscoe, Mike Briscoe,
Francis Brislawn, J O Brittain, PhD, Paul Brittain, Michael Brittan,
PhD, Wayne Brittian, Michael W Britton, Robert Britton, Alfred C Broad,
PhD, Hyrum S Broadbent, PhD, Robt C Broadbent, Sue Broadston, George
Brock, H Kent Brock, Jeffrey Brock, Rainer Brocke, PhD, Douglas A
Brockhaus, D Broderick, PhD, Ivor Brodie, PhD, JB Brodie, F S Broerman,
Woody Brofman, PhD, Robert W Broge, PhD, Chirs Brioli, Jerome
Bromkowski, MD, David A Bromley, PhD, Richard K Bronder, Tanya
Broniszewski, Vin Brono, Charles E Bronson, Mark Bronson, John
Bronstein, PhD, Mark Bronston, PhD, John Brook, PhD, Hampton R Brooker,
Frank Brookings, Bruce Brooks, Dean C Brooks, Fred A Brooks, Gordon
Brooks, James Brooks, James E Brooks, PhD, Kent Brooks, Lois Brooks, ND
Brooks, Ray Brooks, Robert A. Brooks, PhD, Robert R Brooks, PhD,
Richard Broschat, John R Brose, W E Broshears, Fred B Brost, Charles O
Brostrom, PhD, James Brothen, Robert J Brotherton, PhD, Walter
Brouillette, PhD, Paul C Broun, MD, Francis Broussard, Mary J
Broussard, Matthew Broussard, Allen S Brower, George Brower, PhD, J
Brower, Rick A Brower, Thomas D Brower, MD, Alan B Brwon, Albert L
Brown, PhD, Apryl Brown, Arlen Brown, PhD, Bahngrell W Brown, PhD, Ben
Brown, Billings Brown, PhD, Bob D Brown, Brad Brown, Brenda Brown,
Bruce L Brown, C A Brown, Charles Brown, PhD, Charles Brown, Charles R
Brown I I, Christopher J Brown, MD, David Brown, David P Brown, PhD,
Donnie Brown, Doug L Brown, Douglas S Brown, Elise A Brown, PhD,
Ellsworth Brown, PhD, Eugene Brown, Fitzhugh L Brown, G All Brown
Top Previous Next
Gary L Brown, Gerald R Brown, PhD, Glenn Brown, PhD, Hal W Brown, Henry
BR Brown, Henry S Brown, PhD, Herbert Brown, PhD, Howard Brown, J B
Brown, J Paul Brown, James Brown, James Brown, James Brown, PhD, James
Brown Jr, James M Brown, PhD, James S Brown, Jeremy J Brown, Jerry W
Brown, PhD, Jim Brown, Jim Brown, John B Brown, John Brown, John D
Brown, John F. Brown, John M Brown, PhD, John N Brown, John W Brown,
Kenneth T Brown, PhD, Larry Brown, Leonard F Brown, Jr, PhD, Lewis F
Brown, PhD, Lloyd L Brown, Melvin H Brown, PhD, Murray A Brown, PhD, N
Brown, Olen Brown, PhD, P T Brown, Ralph Brown, Raymond E Brown,
Richard B Brown, PhD, Richard Brown, Richard E Brown, MD, Richard L
Brown, Robert B Brown, Robert Brown, PhD, Robert Brown, PhD, Robert E
Brown, Robert E Brown, PhD, Robert G Brown, Robt A Brown, PhD, Robt C
Brown, MD, Robt E Brown, Roderick B Brown, MD, Ronald Brown, PhD, Roy W
Brown, S Kent Brown, MD, Stephen Brown, MD, Stephen R Brown, Steven
Brown, Thomas V Brown, Walter R J Brown, Will Brown, William Brown,
William M Brown, PhD, Cornelius P Browne, PhD, James Browne, Phillip
Browne, MD, RL Browne, D Brownell, Don Brownfield, Shelby H Brownfield,
Robt S Brownhill, James A Browning, Jimmy D. Browning, John S Brtis,
Burton D Brubaker, PhD, James E Brubaker, Paul Eugene Brubaker, PhD,
Peter Brubaker, Charles R Bruce, PhD, Dail Bruce, David Bruce, MD,
George H Bruce, Paul L Bruce, Peter C Bruce, Sandra Bruce, Carl W
Bruch, PhD, Kenneth B Bruckart, Robert Brueck, Col Wm Bruenner, Carl
Bruice, Don Brumm, Harrison Brundage, Eugene J Brunelle, PhD, Madelyn
Bruning, Lloyd Brunkhort, Charles E. Brunner, Mark S Brunner, Arthur D
Bruno, John Bruno, PhD, Thomas Bruno, PhD, Kelly W Bruns, Lester G
Bruns, PhD, Robert F Burns, PhD, Gerald R Brunskill, Tim Brunson, John
B Brush, Walter Brush, Merlyn A Brusven, PhD, Frederick V Brutcher, Jr,
PhD, Samuel R M Burton, Anthony Bruzzese, MD, David A Bryan, PhD, Gary
G Bryan, Howard Bryan, John D Bryan, Sibley Bryan, Tom Bryan, Barry W
Bryant, PhD, Carrel Bryant, David W Bryant, John H Bryant, John M
Bryant, Michael D Bryant, PhD, Robert W Bryant, Thomas Bryant, Thomas
Bryant, Charles Bryson, Ken Brzozowski, PhD, Charles B Bucek, Anne H
Buchanan, Russell A Buchanan, Shawn P Buchanan, Steven Buchanan,
Richard L Bucheit, Donald Buchholz, John H Buchholz, PhD, Smil S
Buchman, R Buchy, Carl Buck, PhD, Ellen F Buck, Joel W Buck, Harold M.
Buckey, John Buckinger, Tom Buckleitner, Ellis Bucklen, David A
Buckley, Edward H Buckley, PhD, Jim E Buckley, Ronald E Buckley, Stuart
Buckmaster, Donald Buckner, Gary L Buckwalter, PhD, Edsel T Bucovaz,
PhD, J Fred Bucy, PhD, Roy S. Brucy, MD, Carl J Buczek, PhD, Perry
Buda, Kevin Buddie, Teresa Buden, Wallace D Budge, PhD, Edwin Buehler,
PhD, Elizabeth Buell, Mary M Buerger, Walter Buerger, MD, Brent J
Buescher, PhD, Larry Buess, Greg Buffington, J F Buffington, Norris L
Buffington Jr, Philip G Buffinton, Charles R Buffler, PhD, Rodger K
Bufford, PhD, Sterling L Owe Bugg, Victor Buhrke, PhD, Francis Buiting,
C James Bulla, Daniel Bullard, PhD, Ervin T Bullard, PhD, Paul Buller,
Lloyd Bullerman, PhD, William Bullis, PhD, David Bullock, Lawrence E
Bullock, Rich Bullock, Roy L. Bulls, Walter T Bulson, Bill Bumgarner,
Paul L Bunce, MD, David Wm Bunch, PhD, Harry D Bunch, PhD, John Bunch,
Wm H Bunch Jr, Robt W Bundick, Michael Bundra, Hallie Flowers Bundy,
PhD, Stephen Bundy, Merle Bunker, PhD, H Franklin Bunn, MD, John
Bunnell, Mark Bunnell, George J Buntley, PhD, Martin Bunton, Edward
Buonopane, MD, Kenneth Burbank, PhD, James H Burbo, Paul Burbutis,
Elisabeth Burch, Holly Burch, James C Burch, T L Burch, James J
Burchall, PhD, Donald F Burchfield, PhD, Jacob Burckhard, Daivd
Burdeaux, Harvey Burden, PhD, Robert Burdick, Hugh J Burford, PhD,
Henry Burger, PhD, Philip C Burger, PhD, Robert Burger, Brian Burges,
John C Burgeson, Calvin Burgess, John Burgess, Michael Burgess, Roy A
Burgess, William Burgess, Roger C. Burggraf, Justin Burggraff, Ronald
Burgher, PhD, Leonard F Burkart, PhD, Amy L Burke, Amy S. Burke, Burke,
David T Burke, Kim A Burke, E A Burke, Edward W Burke, PhD, Gary Burke,
J E Burke, PhD, Marty Burke, Richard L Burke, PhD, Walter Burke, John P
Burkett, David S Burkhalter, Harold E Burkhart, PhD, Richard Burkhart,
James F Burkholder, Brad Burks, Ralph Burks, Ned Burleson, PhD, David R
Burley, PhD, R F Burlingame, Jay B Burner, Bryan Burnett, Craig
Burnett, J R Burnett, PhD, John N Burnett, PhD, Peter G Burnett, Donald
C Burnham, Robert Burnham, Robert W Burnop, Frank B Burns, PhD, John
Burns, MD, Leslie L Burns, PhD, Michel S Burns, Robert Burns, Robt D
Burns, PhD, Stanley Burns, Stephen R. Burns, Victor W Burns, PhD, Mike
Burnson, William P Burpeau Jr, John F Burr, Michael Burrell, Steve
Burrell, Greg Burrough, Joe Burroughs, W F Burroughs, Kevin Burrows,
Richard S Burrows, PhD, William Burrows, PhD, Eddie Burt, PhD, Philip B
Burt, PhD, B Burton, PhD, Gary Burton, Nancy Burton, Everett Burts,
Calvin C Burwell, James Robert Burwell, PhD, John Burwell, Richard S
Burwen, Alan Burwinkel, MD, Donald L Buscarello, Daniel A Busch, PhD,
Edward G Busch, Neal Busch, PhD, Tom Busch, Rick Buschini, Gary D
Buser, Robert Bush, Roger Bush, T Bush, Thomas Bush, Edwin F Bushman,
Robert Bushnell, PhD, Timothy P. Bushnell, Robert Busing, Elsworth R
Buskirk, PhD, Daniel H Buss, Duane J Buss, PhD, Robert Buss, MD,
Stanley E Buss, Gregory Bussell, Ceil Bussiere, W V Bussmann, PhD,
Susan Buta, Bill Butler, David Butler, Dennis L Butler, Don Butler,
Fred Butler, George B. Butler, PhD, James Butler, James L Butler, PhD,
Karl D Butler, PhD, Margaret K Butler, O Doyle Butler, Philip Alan
Butler, PhD, Rhendal C Butler, Ronald Butler, Scott E Butler, PhD, T
Butler, Thomas Butler, Wm R Butler, Paul Butman, Robert Buto, Stan
Butt, Gordon B Butterfield, Thomas A Butterworth, PhD, Sidney E
Buttrill, PhD, Carolyn Buttross, MD, Jake D Butts, Michael A Butts,
Rodney G. Butts, Ralph O Butz, MD, E B Buxton, E B Buxton, Warren F
Buxton, PhD, Cathy T Buzzo, Clinton Bybee, P D Bybee, Jr, P Edward
Byerly, PhD, Nelson Byman, Donald G Bryant, PhD, Richard D Byrd, PhD,
Robert C Byrd, W D Byrd, Bernard Byrne, PhD, Ken Byrne, William M.
Byrne, PhD, John Byrnes, MD, Roy Byrom
C
Algyte R Cabak, Mike Cabirac, Edwin Cable, Ann Cabot, Patricia R
Cabral, Fred B Caddell, Fernando Cadena, PhD, C Cadenhead, PhD, Wm P
Cadogan, PhD, Anthony P Cadrioli, Warren D Cadwell, Howard H Cady, PhD,
Michael S Cafferty, Edward George Caflisch, PhD, Ben J Cagle, William S
Cagle, Dennis Cahill, Dennis Cahill, Roger Cahill, DVM, William M
Cahill, David S Cahn, PhD, Xiaolong Cai, PhD, Charles E Cain, PhD, Geo
B. Cain, Harry J Cain III, Lynn Cain, Stephen R Cain, PhD, T J Cain,
Curtis Caine, MD, David W Caird, J B Caird, Larry Caisoin, Daniel L
Calahan, PhD, Leonard J Calbo, PhD, A G Caldwell, PhD, Elwood Caldwell,
PhD, James B Caldwell, PhD, James Caldwell, Steven Caldwell, PhD,
Richard E Cale, Daniel Caless, Robert E Calhoo, PhD, Brian S. Calhoun,
Joel Calhoun, John Calhoun, Patty Calhoun, S. Pittman Calhoun, William
Calhoun, Lawrence A Caliguiri, MD, Charles Calkins, MD, Mike Callahan,
Jon Callen, Gene Callens, PhD, Dixon Callihan, PhD, Lynn B Calton,
Chris Calvert, PhD, David D Calvert, Lee Cambre, Marvin E Camburn, PhD,
William Camerer, Bruce Cameron, Charles Cameron, Christopher P Cameron,
PhD, J W Cameron, John R Cameron, PhD, Mike Cameron, Wm L Cameron,
Raymond Cammack, PhD, Terry J Cammon, Frederick W Camp, PhD, Jerry L
Camp, John Campagna, Nicholas A Campagna, Jr, David A Campaigne, PhD,
Ernest Campaigne, PhD, Robert Campana, Leonard Campanaro, John D
Campanella, Bob Campbell, Douglas J Campbell, George Campbell, PhD, H D
Campbell, Jeff Campbell, John Campbell, John M Campbell, PhD, John S
Campbell, Larry Campbell, Lynn D Campbell, Milton Hugh Campbell, R L
Campbell, MD, Robert Campbell, Robert Campbell, Robert E Campbell,
Robert F Campbell, Shirley Campbell, Sidney Campbell, Steve K Campbell,
Todd Campbell, Tom Campbell, Warren E Campbell, PhD, Antonio M Campero,
PhD, Robt D Campo, PhD, Alan Campoli, PhD, Enrico Camporesi, MD,
Fernando Campos, MD, Paul B. Canale, MD, Daniel T Canavan, Joseph
Candella, A Van Caneghem, MD, Zoe Canellakis, PhD, Paul Canevaro, Carl
M Canfield, James N Canfield, M Canham, William T Cannady, Dickson
Cannon, G Scott Cannon, Howard Cannon, PhD, Hugh N Cannon, J E Cannon,
Peter Cannon, PhD, Philip Cannon, PhD, Peter J Canterino, PhD, Daniel J
Cantliffe, PhD, Joe A. Cantlon, Craig Cantoni, Manfred Cantow, PhD,
Brian L Cantrell, Walter Canzonier, Hengshu Cao, PhD, David Cape, Randy
S Cape, Juan J Capello, MD, Fredric S Capitosti, Michael E Caplis, PhD,
James F Capobianco, Louis J Capozzoli, PhD, Frank Cappelli, Robert
Carbonara, PhD, Kathy Carbrey, Harold E Carda, AE Carden, PhD, Arnold E
Carden, PhD, Bryan J Carder Jr, MD, Thomas D Carder, William Thomas
Cardwell, Darrel E Cardy, Mario Carelli, PhD, Curtis D Carey, John J
Carey, Russell Carey, George Carini, PhD, George Carini II, PhD, Lenore
Carleton, Harold E Carley, PhD, E N Carlier, Philip H. Carlisle, Scott
Carlisle, Don S Carloss, Eric Carlsen, PhD, F L Carlsen, Gary Carlsen,
A William Carlson, Arne Carlson, Carl E Carlson, Carlson, Charles
Carlson, Dave Carlson, David R. Carlson, Donald Carlson, PhD, Douglas
Carlson, Edward C Carlson, PhD, Frederick P Carlson, PhD, Fredric
Carlson, PhD, Garry Carlson, George Carlson, PhD, J David Carlson, PhD,
Lawrence O Carlson, Peter R Carlson, Roy F Carlson, Steve M Carlson,
Thomas C Carlson, William A Carlson, Alan Carlton, Glenn Carman, David
W Carnell, B Ronald Carnes, Peyton Carnes, William P Carney, PhD, E
Louis Caron, PhD, Arthur Carpenito, Arthur Carpenito, Benjamin H
Carpenter, PhD, Bruce N Carpenter, Charles Carpenter, PhD, David
Carpenter, Elaine Carpenter, Jack W Carpenter, PhD, Lyle L Carpenter,
Robert Carpenter, Robert K Carpenter, Scott Carpenter, Thomas
Carpenter, Will D Carpenter, PhD, Barry Carr, PhD, Brenda L Carr, C
Jelleff Carr, PhD, Edward M Carr, Jerome B Carr, PhD, Leo Carr, Lester
E Carr Iii, PhD, Richard S Carr, Victor Carr, Laura H Carreira, PhD,
Roland Carreker, PhD, Charles Carrell, Michael J Carrera, R S Carrice,
Edward Carriere, PhD, Bonnie Carrington, Marion M Carrion, PhD, Gilbert
C Carroll, MD, Greg R Carroll, J Randall Carroll, James A Carroll, PhD,
James Carroll, John Carroll, PhD, John Carroll, Jon M Carroll, Laj
Carroll, Phillip Carroll, Thomas Carroll, W Carroll, Keith T Carron,
PhD, Stephen Carrozza, Brent Carruth, Charles Carson, PhD, Chuck
Carson, Gwendolyn Carson, PhD, J. A. Carson, James Carson III, Jonathan
Carson, Richard M Carson, Shawn Carson, Mary E Carsten, PhD, Bowdre
Carswell, MD, David Carta, PhD, David G Carta, Lynn K Carta, PhD, David
Carter, David L Carter, PhD, Fred Carter, MD, Greg Carter, J. O.
Carter, John P Carter, Joseph O. Carter, Kenneth Carter, MD, Louise
Carter, Mason C Carter, PhD, Oran R Carter, Steven L. Carter, Thomas R
Carter, William Carter, Marshall F Cartledge, Michael R Cartwright,
Betty Carty, Joseph Caruana, Louis B Caruana, PhD, Louis M Caruana,
Alan Caruba, J C Caruthers, Mark Carvalho, Clara D Carver, Hugh W
Carver, James Clark Carver, PhD, John G Carver, PhD, Robert Carver,
PhD, John De Carville, Aubrey M Cary Jr, Audra B Cary, Robert C
Casagranda, Tony Casagranda, Lewis Casbon, Charles Case, Douglas Case,
Eddie Case, Mike Case, Robert B Case, MD, William J Caseber Jr, Richard
M Casello, Phillip M Caserotti, Jeffrey Casey, M. V. Casey, Robert M
Casey, Chris Cash, W T Cashdollar, Davis Caskey, George R Caskey, PhD,
Armano Casola, PhD, Sidney Casrle, Richard S Cass, Don S Cassell, Steve
Cassell, Edward Cassidy, John Cassidy Jr, Patrick E Cassidy, PhD, J K
Cassil, Stan J Casswell, Neal Castagoli, PhD, Valen Castellano, Gary
Castellaw, Alan W Castellion, PhD, Anthony J Castiglia, MD, Craig T
Castille, Ralph Castille, Joseph Castillo, John G Castle, PhD, J Steven
Castleberry, Kenneth Castleton, Thomas P Castronovo, Peter Castruccio,
Peter Castruccio, PhD, William Caswell, Dominic Anthony Cataldo, PhD,
Paul Cate, Paul D Cate, Frank P Catena, Jack Cates, Robert L Catherman,
MD, Billy R Catherwood, Lawrence M Cathles, PhD, Renata E Cathou, PhD,
John W Catledge, Thomas E Catlett, Jim Caton, Tim Caton, David Cattell,
PhD, David Cattron, Paul Caubin, Robert Lee Caudill, MD, Warren D
Caudle, W L Caudry, Thomas K Caughey, PhD, John A Caughlan, Jerry
Caulder, PhD, Chaels Causey, James Causey, Thomas Cavaiani, PhD, Robert
Cavalleri, PhD, Michael Cavanaugh, PG Cavazos, Bruce W Cavender, E
Caveney, Bill K Caylor, Steven L Cazad, Paul Cazier, Toni Cecil, Carl N
Cederstrand, PhD, Peter La Celle, PhD, Chris Cellucci, PhD, Zoltan J
Cendes, PhD, Thomas W. Cendrowski, Rosemary L Centner, Nancy L
Centofante, MD, Philip Ceriani, MD, Samuel Cerni, PhD, Lawrnece J
Cervellino, Steven Chabotte, John F. Chadbourne, PhD, Ronald A
Chadderton, PhD, Arthur V Chadwick, PhD, John Chadwick, Pamela Chaffee,
Rowand Chaffee, PhD, Charles T Chaffin, PhD, Paritosh M Chakrabarti,
PhD, William L Chalmer, Adrian R Chamberlain, PhD, Barry Chamberlain,
Bruce Chamberlain, Carlton Chamberlain, Charles Chamberlain, PhD, David
L Chamberlain, PhD, Dilworth W Chamberlain, PhD, Samuel Z Chamberlain,
Angelo Chamberlin, Paul Chamberlin, Roger S Chamberlin, RS Chamberlin,
Charles M Chambers, PhD, David Chambers, Doyle Chambers, PhD, Glen D
Chambers, John E Chambers, John S Chambers, MD, Ken Chambers, Martha
Homes Chambers, Philip Chambers, Roger Chambers, Carroll W Chambiss,
PhD, William P Chamlee, Edwin B Champagne, PhD, John Champion, Jr,
Kenneth Champion, PhD, Robert Champlin, Chun K Chan, PhD, Sham- Yuen
Chan, PhD, Shu F Chan, PhD, Sunney L Chan, PhD, Z. Chan, Britton
Chance, Ronald R Chance, PhD, Charles H Chandler, Clarence Chandler,
Frances Chandler, Jeff Chandler, John Chandler, Leonard B Chandler,
PhD, Steven Chandler, DDS, William R Chandler, Berken Chang, PhD, Chung
Jam Chang, PhD, Freddy W Chang, PhD, Robin Chang, PhD, Yung Feng Chang,
PhD, Nicholas D Change, Stanley A Changon, Stanley Changnon, Jr, Donald
J Channin, Raymond E Chapel, Alain De La Chapelle, MD, Daniel W
Chapman, James W Chapman, John Judson Chapman, PhD, P F Chapman, Robert
T Chapman, John Chappell, Rick Chappell, Douglas E Chappelle, Harlan
Chappelle, Stanley Charap, PhD, Luis Charbonier, MD, Al Charland, James
Charles, Lloyd M. Charles, MD, M. J. Charles, MD, Robert C Charles,
Bruce R Charlton, John M Charnes, PhD, Edward Charney, William
Charowhas, Robert A Charpie, Frank Charron, Vanieca L Charvat, Andrew J
Chase, Charles H Chase, Jim C Chase, Kenneth Chase, PhD, Marci M Chase,
Morley Chase, Paul Chase, Robt H Chase, JM Chasler, DDS, Jacob Chass,
David Chastain, Thomas J Chastant, Edward Chastka, MD, Ashok K
Chatterjee, Norman Chatterton, PhD, Robert Chauvin, PhD, Glenn Chaves,
Brad N Chazotte, PhD, Lynn Chcoran, Curtis A Cheatham, E Cheatham,
Robert E Chech, PhD, Paul S Check, Dennis Wm Cheek, PhD, Zafarullah K
Cheema, PhD, Robert L Cheever, John Chehaske, Chen, PhD, Chi Hau Chen,
PhD, Kun Hua Chen, PhD, Stuart S Chen, PhD, Chi- Yang Cheng, PhD, Craig
F Cheng, K L Cheng, PhD, Kuang Liu Cheng, PhD, Thomas C Cheng, PhD,
Wade Cheng, PhD, Lou Chenot, William L Chenoweth, Kenneth P Chepenick,
PhD, Genady Cherepanov, PhD, Dean Chergotis, S Chernish, MD, Roy
Cherris, Jimmie L Cherry, PhD
Top Previous Next
Peter Chesney, Robert F Chesnik, Arthur Chester, PhD, John W Chester,
Alfred P Chestnut, PhD, Paul A Chevernick, MD, Dhan Chevli, PhD,
William Chewning, Benjamin F Cheydleur, Long Chi Lee, PhD, Nancy A.
Chiafulio, Yuen S Chiang, PhD, V Chiappardi, R Chiarenzelli, Ken
Chiavone, Gerald Chicoine, T D Avid Chikalla, PhD, David Chilcote, PhD,
Ronald B Child, Milton Childers, PhD, Thomas Childers, David Childs,
James Childs, MD, Michael J. Chiles, George Chilingar, PhD, Kenneth
Chilton, PhD, Frank Chimenti, PhD, David T Chin, PhD, Hong Chin, PhD,
Lincoln Chin, PhD, Melvin Ching, PhD, Chris Chisholm, J D Chism, John
Chism, Craig Chismarick, Shyamala Chitaley, PhD, John G Chittick, Randy
Chitwood, David Chleck, Soung Moo Cho, PhD, Darrel L Choate, Dale
Chodos, MD, DS Choi, PhD, Ye C Choi, PhD, William M Chop Jr, MD, Manoj
Chopra, PhD, Kenneth Choquette, MD, Frank W Chorpenning, PhD, Robert J
Chorvat, PhD, Sham Chotai, Edward Choulnard, PhD, Tai-Low Chow, PhD,
Wen L Chow, PhD, Peter S Chrapliwy, PhD, Channing B Chrisman, Geo A
Christenberry, PhD, Alan Christensen, Bent A Christensen, PhD, Bruce P
Christensen, PhD, Charles R Christensen, PhD, Don Christensen, Duane
Christensen, Duane Christensen, Howard Christensen, John Christensen,
Kent Christensen, Odin Christensen, PhD, Peter Christensen, Richard
Christensen, Robin Christensen, Robt L Christensen, PhD, Ron V
Christensen, David Christiansen, James B Christiansen, PhD, Richard
Christiansen, PhD, Robert M Christiansen, PhD, Kent B Christianson,
Warner Howard Christie, PhD, Kenneth Christman, MD, Sally Christman, J
W Chirstoff, Jay P Christofferson, PhD, Jonathan Christopher, Dennis
Christopherson, Alfred L Christy, PhD, Donald O Christy, PhD, Francis
Christy, J Steve Christy, Kenneth G Christy, Jack C Chroy, Chrysler,
PhD, Ryan A Chrysler, Boa The Chu, PhD, Constantino Chua, C. R. Chung,
MD, Eugene L Church, PhD, John P Church, PhD, Robert Church, Robert T.
Church, Stanford Church, Steven R Church, PhD, Habte G Churnet, PhD,
Petr Chylek, PhD, Donald J Ciappenelli, PhD, Alfred E Ciarlone, PhD, J.
Joseph Ciavarra, Jr, Ja Cifonelli, PhD, Robert J Cihak, MD, Marc
Cimolino, PhD, Deborah M Ciombor, PhD, Howard Cion, Jon A Ciotti,
Joseph Cipolla, Michael Circosta, Kenneth W Ciriacks, PhD, A Cisar,
Joseph R Cissell, James Civis, Edwin Claassen, PhD, Gary D Clack, M.
Caldwell, PhD, Stephen Claeys, Robert M Claflin, PhD, Gregory S Claine,
Clarence Clapp, David Clapp, James L Clapp, PhD, Richard Clapp, Leroy
Clardy, Tim Clarey, PhD, Albert F Clark, Bill P Clark, PhD, Charles
Clark, PhD, Chris Clark, Clark, David T Clark, PhD, Donald Clark,
Donald L Clark, PhD, Ginger Clark, Grady Clark, PhD, Howard G Clark,
PhD, Hugh Clark, PhD, Ian Clark, J Donald Clark, James Clark, PhD,
James G Clark, PhD, James W Clark, James Wm Clark, Jim Clark, John A
Clark, PhD, John B Clark, John B Clark, PhD, John Clark, MD, John
Clark, MD, John Clark, MD, John Clark, Jon G Clark, Kenneth Clark, Kent
Clark, Kimball Clark, PhD, Lawrence E Clark, MD, Lincoln Clark Jr, M
Clark, Paul B Clark, Randall D Clark, Randil L Clark, MD, PhD, Richard
A Clark, Richard T Clark, Richard W Clark, Robert Clark, Robert Clark,
Robert Clark, Robey Clark, Thomas Clark, William Clark, William Clark,
MD, Danny J Clarke, Duane G Clarke, PhD, Earlin N Clarke, James Clarke,
PhD, James R Clarke, John Clarke, John Clarke, John F Gates Clarke,
PhD, Joseph W Clarke, Larry Clarke, Otis M Clarke Jr, Richard H Clarke,
PhD, Richard P Clarke, PhD, John T Clarno, Calvin Miller Class, PhD,
James Classen, James Classen, Karen Clausen, John F Clauser, PhD, Don
Clauson, Chris Clay, Harris Clay, Jerry H Clay, John A. Clay, CK
Claycomb, PhD, Gordon M Claycomb, David Clayton, PhD, Fred Clayton,
PhD, John W Clayton, PhD, Ronald Clayton, Stan G Clayton, William
Clayton, Bill Cleary, John Cleary, James L Cleason, Fran Van Cleave,
PhD, John C Clegg, PhD, La Var Clegg, Wallace Cleland, PhD, Wm L
Cleland, Leroy H Clem, PhD, William M Clement, PhD, Bob Clements, Neil
C Clements, MD, Stephen F Clements, Gerhardt Clementson, PhD, John A
Clendening, PhD, Jack Cleveland, Jeffrey Clevenger, William A
Clevenger, Charles B Cliett, Howard J Clifford, Charles Cilfone, W
Clift, James O Climo, F W Clinard, PhD, Fred W Clinard, David Cline,
Dennis Cline, James D Cline, JT Cline, Warren K Cline, PhD, HB
Clingempeel, Mansfield Clinnick, Alan Clodfelter, Thomas L Cloer Jr, M
Gerard Cloherty, MD, Christian J Blom, PhD, Todd Cloninger, David M
Close, PhD, Jim Cloud, Miline Clough, Ray William Clough, PhD, Michael
R Clover, PhD, Douglas Clow, Lloyd S Cluff, David N Clum, Mike Clumper,
Peter Clute, Daniel G Coake, J David Coakley, Mary Coakley, PhD,
Clarence L Coates, PhD, Thomas Coates, Keith H Coats, PhD, David M
Cobb, Howard Cobb, Ty Cobb, W Frank Cobb Jr, William Cobb, James H
Cobbs, William J Coben, James F Coble, PhD, Dennis Coburn, James
Coburn, PhD, Donald Cochran, Leighton S Cochran, PhD, Paul Cochran, W A
Cochran, Jr, Carl Cochrane, J R Cockerham, Jerry Cockerham, Wm H
Cockerham, Susan Cockerhan, Benjamim T Cockrill Jr, Elmer Lendell
Cockrum, PhD, Richard Cockrum, DVM, James Codding, Joseph W Coddou,
Paul Coder, Daniel Codespoti, PhD, Charles W Coe Ii, William D Coe,
Edward D Coen, Fritz Coester, PhD, Charles Cofer, Harland E Cofer, PhD,
William Coffeen, PhD, Wm R Coffelt, C Robert Coffey, Michael Coffey,
Nick Coffey, J M Coffield, Michael Coffman, PhD, Philip Coffman,
Anthony Cofrancesco, PhD, Wade E Cogan, PhD, Allen Cogbill, PhD, Chris
Coggins, PhD, David B Coghlan, Arthur Cogle, Theodore Cogut, William T
Cohan, Allan H Cohen, PhD, Arnold Cohen, PhD, Bernard A Cohen, PhD,
Flossie Cohen, MD, Harvey H Cohen, Howard J Cohen, PhD, Jerry J Cohen,
Lawrence Cohen, Merrill Cohen, MD, Norman Cohen, Richard M Cohen, PhD,
Ronald E Cohen, PhD, Sam Cohen, Susanne K Cohen, William C Cohen, PhD,
Charles Erwin Cohn, PhD, Ernst M Cohn, Robert Cohn, MD, Sanford Cohn,
Harry Cohnger, C E Coke, PhD, Patricia Cokeley, Clayton Coker, Glen P
Coker, Ralph Coker, D E Cokley, Lt Col Andre Gerner, Francis Colace,
MD, Stefan Colban, Gene Louis Colborn, PhD, Mar Colburn, W B Colburn,
Edward E Colby, M W Colchin, Lawrence E Coldren, Avean W Cole, PhD, B
Theodore Cole, PhD, Christopher J Cole, Clarence R Cole, PhD, David R
Cole, Douglas E. Cole, Eugene Cole, PhD, Frank W Cole, George R Cole,
PhD, Henry B Cole, James W Cole, John Cole, Kenneth R Cole, Lee A Cole,
PhD, Mariette Cole, PhD, Randall K Cole, PhD, Samuel P Cole, Stephen
Cole, PhD, Forrest Donald Colegrove, PhD, Anthony J Colella, Philip J
Colella, Roberto Colella, PhD, Bobby Coleman, Donald Coleman, Michael
Coleman, Paul Coleman, PhD, R. G. Coleman, PhD, Richard A Coleman,
Robert Coleman, PhD, Robert G Coleman, Robert G Coleman, PhD, Steven
Coleman, William E. Coleman, Woodrow Coleman, Frank Coles, R D Coles,
Andrew Coley, Jr, MD, Robt Coley, Donald Colgan, J R Colgan, MD, Summer
Colgan, Lawrence Colin, DDS, Hans Coll, PhD, Jeffrey M Collar, A
Collard, Joel Colley, MD, Don Collier, Donald W Collier, James Collier,
PhD, Thomas F Collier, MD, PhD, Wm B Collier, PhD, Alan Collins, PhD,
Andy R Collins, Aubrey Collins, Charles A. Collins, Clifford B Collins,
David B Collins, Dennis Collins, PhD, Edward Collins, PhD, Frederick C
Collins, PhD, Gary Collins, PhD, Geo H Collins, MD, George Collins, H
Douglas Collins, MD, Horace R Collins, Jane E Collins, Jimmie Collins,
PhD, Kenneth B Collins, Robert L Collins, Stephen L Collins, Ted
Collins, William Henry Collins, William P Collins, Wm F Collins, PhD, P
J Collipp, MD, Bruce Collippns, Bertram W Collyer, Carlos A Colmenares,
PhD, Arthur F Colombo, PhD, Don J Colton, Gregg B Colton, Andre
Coltrin, Clair R Colvin, PhD, Todd Colvin, Robert Neil Colwell, PhD,
William T Colwell, PhD, E Keith Colyer, Leon Combs, PhD, John Comeaux,
Jack Comeford, PhD, E James Comer, Thomas Comi, PhD, Comisford, Robert
Comizzoli, PhD, Robert Commander, John Commerford, PhD, Wayne M
Compton, H Comsio, Michael W Conaboy, Floyd S Conant, Leonard
Conapinski, Thor Concepts, James Concilla, John Conconnan, Norman I
Condit, George T Condo, PhD, Gregory J Condon, MD, William F. Condon,
PhD, H Anson Cone, MD, John S. Cone, Johns Cone, F Dee Conerly Jr,
Robert G Confer, Rosemary Conger, John P Conigilo, Martin E Coniglio,
John Conlan, D Conley, PhD, Gary Conley, Gary Conley, Joseph H Conley,
R Conley, Carter B Conlin, Ralph D. Conlon, Paul K Conn, PhD, Rex B
Conn, MD, Robert Conn, H E Connell, James Connell, James R Connell,
John J Connelly, PhD, John J Connelly, Michael S Connelly, T Donnelly,
PhD, Barry G Conner, Charles Conner, Dennis D Conner, Teresa A Conner,
Wm J Connick, Jr, James D Connolly, John I Connolly Jr, PhD, P E
Connolly, John M Connor, Wayne M O Connor, Eugene A Conrad, PhD, George
Conrad, Paul W Conrad, Ralph L Conrad, Robert Conrad, Roddy Conrad,
PhD, Walter E Conrad, PhD, Jeff Conroy, Paul Consroe, PhD, David L
Constans, Gheorghe M Constantinescu, PhD, Donald R Conte, James Conway,
PhD, John P Conway, Mary Conway
Top Previous Next
Thomas W Conway, PhD, William Conway, Mark Cook, PhD, Addison G Cook,
PhD, C Cook, Charels Cook, Donald J Cook, PhD, Douglas H Cook, Frandk
Cook, PhD, George W Cook, Glenn C Cook, MD, Henry E Cook Jr, James H
Cook, Janice Cook, Karl Cook, LP Cook, Maurice G Cook, PhD, Melvin A
Cook, PhD, Michael Cook, Mr Vernon O. Cook, Robert C Cook, Robert Cook,
Robt B Cook, PhD, Shirl E Cook, Steven Cook, Thomas B Cook Jr, PhD,
Wendell Cook, Anson R Cooke, PhD, James Barry Cooke, James M. Cooksey,
Bingham Cool, PhD, Richard Cool, David Coolbaugh, PhD, Denton Arthur
Cooley, MD, William E Cooley, PhD, Daniel P Coolidge, Marguerite W
Coomes, PhD, Anne M Cooney, Edward Cooney, Harvey L Coonts, Rosa Lee
Coonts, Daniel Cooper, Flip Cooper, George P Cooper, Gordon Cooper,
PhD, Harry C Cooper, James R Cooper, PhD, Jane Cooper, Jeff Cooper,
John C Cooper, Martin Cooper, Max E Cooper, Peter Cooper, Raymond
Cooper, PhD, Robert C Cooper, PhD, Robert S Cooper, PhD, Thomas Cooper,
PhD, David F Cope, PhD, A D Copeland, Kenneth R Copeland, Louis
Copeland, MD, Harry B Copelin, Frederick A Copes, PhD, Donald A.
Copinger, John D Copley, John Copolos, William Copperman, William
Coppoc, Wm S Corak, PhD, M Yavuz Corapcioglu, PhD, Robert B Corbett,
PhD, Kevin Corbin, Murray D Corbin, MD, Carl Corbit, John Corboy, MD,
John M. Corboy, MD, Eugene F Corcoran, PhD, John Corcoran, MD, Stephen
Corcoran, Charles Cordalis, Francis M Cordell, PhD, Ronald E Cordell,
MD, Cllinton N Corder, MD, Carl Cordes, Arthur Cordisco, Christopher
Cordle, PhD, John F Cordone, Vincent F Cordova, Eugene Core, Patrick
Core, John S. Cornett, Robert L Corey, PhD, Henry E Corke, PhD, Walter
H Corkern, PhD, James M Corkill, Kenneth C Corkum, PhD, John L Corl,
Corley, Frank A Cormier, William E Cormier, Russell Corn, Robert L
Cornelius, Creighton N Cornell, David Cornell, John Cornell, S D
Cornell, PhD, Stephen W Cornell, PhD, Arlen C Cornett, John S Cornett,
Holley Cornette, Neil Cornia, Bahne C Cornilsen, PhD, L Corns, David G
Cornwell, PhD, Nancy Cornwell, Roy S Cornwell, Roy S Cornwill, PhD,
Nicholas J Corolis, Don Corona, Deborah A Corridon, Thomas Corrigan,
PhD, Charles E Corry, PhD, Wayne T Corso, Matthew Corulli, Kenneth M.
Cory, Michael Coryn, Arthur J Cosgrove, George Cosmides, PhD, Wm H Cost
III, Eugene Costa, James P Costa, Peter F Costa, Ronald A. Costanzo,
Mark J Costello, Nationwide Envro Svcs, Steven A Costello, Rebecca B
Costello, PhD, John Costlow, PhD, Allen Costoff, PhD, Kevin Cotchen,
Mark D Cote, Wilfred A Cote, PhD, Harry E Cotrill Jr, Harold Cott, PhD,
Grant Cottam, Richard O Cottie, Frank E. Cotton, Jr, PhD, Marion
Cotton, PhD, Spencer M Cotton, William R Cotton, PhD, Vincent F
Cottone, Phil Cottrell, David G Cotts, Richard L Coty, Larry Coudriet,
Clifton Couey, Ronald A Coulson, PhD, Richard Councill, Marcus L
Countiss, Gary Countryman, Galen L Coupe, Arnold Court, PhD, Arnold
Court, PhD, Arthur Courtney, Charles R Courtney, Francis E. Courtney,
Jr, William H Courtney III, PhD, Raymond C Cousins, PhD, Sylvere
Coussement, PhD, Ross Couwenhoven, PhD, Fred Covelli, Eugene Covert,
PhD, Joy Covey, Robt E Covey, Robert Covington, C Michael Cowan, Carl
Cowan, Daniel F Cowan, MD, George Cowan, MD, Tracy Cowan, Wm A Cowan,
PhD, Jeffrey L Coward, John B Cowden, Ronald R Cowden, PhD, Russ
Cowden, Vincent F Cowling, PhD, John D Cowlishaw, PhD, Brian Cox,
Carrol B Cox, Clifford H Cox, PhD, Cyrus W Cox, Dan M Cox, David Cox,
Don C. Cox, Don Cox, Donald J Cox, PhD, Edwin Cox, Frederick Cox, Hiram
M Cox, Jack D Cox, James A Cox, Jerry Cox, Joe B Cox, Lawson G Cox, MD,
Louis Cox, PhD, Michael F Cox, Mike Cox, Morgan Cox, Neil D Cox, PhD,
Robert P. Cox, Sidney G Cox, Francis Coy, MD, Aaron S Coyan, Alan
Coykendall, Robert D Coyle, Kenneth R Coyne, Jerry Crabb, C H Cracauer,
Dan Crackel, Sheldon Craddock, Cecil I Craft, Donald K Craft, Rex R
Craft, Kent Craghead, Cragin, PhD, John M Cragin, Richard A Crago,
Edward J Cragoe, Jr, MD, Kenneth B Craib, Alan M Craig, Bruce Craig,
PhD, Dexter Craig, Felicia Craig, Irving M Craig, James Craig, PhD,
John A. Craig, John Merrill Craig, John P. Craig, MD, Ronald Craig, R E
Craigie Jr, Gordon E Craigo, Donald Lee Crain, PhD, Glenn D Crain,
Jerry L. Crain, David D. Cram, PhD, Donald J Cram, PhD, Howard Cramer,
PhD, John A Cramer, PhD, Rex C Cramer, Richard Cramer, Edmund T Cranch,
PhD, John R Crandall, PhD, Walter Crandall, PhD, Dale E Crane, David C.
Crane, PhD, Frederick L Crane, PhD, Lowell Crane, Chris L Craney, PhD,
Richard A Craven, James F Cravens, Thomas Cravens, Thomas V Cravens,
Clara D Craver, PhD, Doyle Craver, Mark W Craver, Dean Crawford, Don
Crawford, Duane A Crawford, James Crawford, Jonathan Crawford, Steven P
Crawford, Thomas Crawford, PhD, Robt S Craxton, PhD, David Craymes, Ron
Creamer, S J Creane, Ben Creason, Buford Creech, Wendell Creech, Kevin
Creedon, Michel Creek, Prentice Creel, T Ch Creese, R.S. Cremisio, PhD,
Valerie Voss Crenshaw, Robert Cresci, PhD, Anne E Cress, PhD, C Raymond
Cress, PhD, Frank Cress, Kenneth S Cressman, Ronald Cresswell, PhD,
John Edwin Crew, PhD, Bradford R Crews, Gregory A Crews, Phillip O
Crews, PhD, Diana Creyes, Jim Cribbs, Richard E Cribbs, Robert W
Cribbs, Donald F Crie, Peter Crimi, PhD, Richard Crippen, Harry N
Cripps, PhD, Peter A. Crisi, Joseph P Crisler, PhD, Kurt Criss, Thomas
B Criss, PhD, Robert Crist, J L Crittenden, Thomas Bernard Croat, PhD,
Charlie Crocker, Luanne S Crockett, George T Croft, PhD, Jerry Croft,
Michael Croft, Wayne S Croft, William Croft, Blake Cromartie, Daniel
Crone, Donald C Cronemeyer, PhD, Steven W Cronin, Robert K Crookston,
PhD, Edward Crosby, Edward Crosby, G Kingman Crosby, Shawn J. Crosby,
Ajmes G Crose, PhD, Thomas J Crosier, David Crosley, Elden Cross, Kevin
P Cross, Robt F Cross, DVM, William Cross, A Scott Crossfield, Tom
Crossman, Kenneth A Crossner, PhD, D B Crouch, John Croul, David L
Crouse, Stephen Crouse, Robert M Crout, Morgan L Crow, Gene Autrey
Crowder, PhD, Helen Crowder, Curtis Crowe, David Crowe, Delmar N Crowe
Jr, Donald E Crowell, Edwin P Crowell, Chris Crowley, John Crowley,
Michael S Crowley, PhD, Mrs Jamie Crowley, John A Crown Jr, C Richard
Crowther, PhD, Robert H Crowther, Frank C Croxton, PhD, Richard Cruce,
William J Cruice, Michael Cruickshank, PhD, Duane Crum, PhD, Edward H
Crum, PhD, Glenn H Crumb, PhD, Cris Cruz, Richard L Cryberg, PhD, Billy
Crynes, Tihamer Csaky, MD, Tihamer Z Csaky, MD, Gabriel T Csanady, PhD,
Alan L Csontos, J K Cuar, W D Cubbedge, William Cubbedge, Cubre, Etta
Cuccinello, Jerry F Cuderman, PhD, Donald Cudmore, Donald F Cue, Ronald
Cuenod, Alfred G Cuffe, John R Culbert, Verne Culbertson, Chris Cull,
Char C Cullari, John S Cullen, Stephen L Cullen, MD, William C Cullen,
PhD, Donald M Culler, Floyd Culler, A S Cullick, PhD, Walter E
Cullmann, H. R. Culver, Lester C Culver, PhD, Ray Culver, Peter
Cumerford, Bradford Cummings, David Cummings, PhD, Kenneth D Cummins,
Richard W Cummins, PhD, Tom Cundiff, Lawrence E Cunnick, Allen
Cunningham, David C Cunningham, Howard Cunningham, PhD, John E
Cunningham, PhD, Joseph A Cunningham, MD, Kyle Cunningham, Walter
Cunningham, PhD, Thomas Curin, PhD, Peter Curka, MD, Donald E Van
Curler, Joseph Mc Curnin, Thomas J Curphey, PhD, Walter E Currah,
Curran, Francis M Curran, John T Curran, Ira B Current, James L
Current, Tom P Currie, Wm S Currie, William W Currier, PhD, Janet C
Curry, John Curry, Thomas Curry, PhD, Timmy F Curry, William Curry,
PhD, Frazier Curt, MD, Maria A Curtin, PhD, Thomas Curtin, Fred W
Curtis, Jr, Hannah Curtis, Merlyn Curtis, Stuart Curtis, Chopin
Cusachs, PhD, Charles Cusack III, Charles E Cusack Jr, Joseph Cusack,
Bendit Cushman-Roisin, PhD, Michael S Cuskelly, Herman C Custard, PhD,
Gretchen Custer, Steven R Custer, John M Cuthbert, Lron G Cuthbert,
PhD, Leonard Cutler, PhD, Richard Cutler, PhD, Richard Cutler, PhD,
James R Cutre, Ernest Cutter Jr, Alan Cutting, J F Cuttino, PhD, Jerry
Cuttler, PhD, James Cutts, W T Cutts, George B Cvijanovich, PhD, Burt L
St Cyr, Nelson Cyr, Walter J Czagas, Charles Czbrumberg, Rita Czek,
Thomas P Czepiel, PhD, Jacob Czerwienlec, James Oziomek, PhD, Shannon
Czysz
BC
Bawana wrote:
> BC wrote:
> > Bawana wrote:
>
> > You can find plenty of "experts" claiming that the moon
> > landing was staged or that it was the US that deliberately
> > imploded the World Trade Center towers, but that doesn't
> > exactly mean that makes them right.
>
> Damn tardboy, that exactly how I feel about the despicable UN's IPCC
> and the other agw consensus tards.
>
> All of the Globaloney fanatics are repeating the same theme: global
> warming is a fact attested to by the worlds scientific community, and
> that it is no longer an issue but an accepted scientific fact.
>
> That is, of course, a lot of baloney. Numerous climatologists around
> the world dismiss global warming as a myth, especially the notion that
> mankind is causing the globe to heat by the use of hydrocarbons and
> other allegedly environmentally destructive practices.
Nope. There aren't "numerous climatologists" saying any
such thing. There are are only a handful and even most
of them are just questioning the degree of natural versus
unnatural. They are still in a tiny minority.
>
> Scores of top climatologists continue to scoff at the claims of the
> global warming alarmists and deny that the matter is settled.
Again, no. There aren't "scores of top climatologists"
saying any such thing. You can count on one hand the
"top climatologists" who are even mildly disagreeing with
the main scientific consensus on the matter.
guarantee that article was responsible for von Storch
appearing before that US committee questioning the
"Hockey Stick" model: the committee was strictly a
witch hunt by
Republican Joe Barton, one of congress's better known
anti-science, global warming skeptics intended to cast
aspersions on Mann's "hockey stick model" in particular
and the idea of human-caused global warming in general
by calling to testify a German scientist, Dr. Hans von
Storch, who had written an article about the politics of
global warming. Fortunately things did not turn out as
Barton probably had hoped for:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4693855.stm
http://energycommerce.house.gov/108/Hearings/07192006hearing1987/hearing.htm.
http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/esthag-w/2005/aug/business/pt_wsj.html
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jun2006/2006-06-22-10.asp
http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/archives/060619_ushouse_energycommercehvs.pdf
It's the right wing and big business who have politicized
all this stuff and who have been trying to discredit the
real, bona fide researchers and experts in this by
whatever means possible. They are not the good guys.
Sorry.
-BC
Bawana
BC wrote:
> Bawana wrote:
> > BC wrote:
> > > Bawana wrote:
> >
> > > You can find plenty of "experts" claiming that the moon
> > > landing was staged or that it was the US that deliberately
> > > imploded the World Trade Center towers, but that doesn't
> > > exactly mean that makes them right.
> >
> > Damn tardboy, that exactly how I feel about the despicable UN's IPCC
> > and the other agw consensus tards.
> >
> > All of the Globaloney fanatics are repeating the same theme: global
> > warming is a fact attested to by the worlds scientific community, and
> > that it is no longer an issue but an accepted scientific fact.
> >
> > That is, of course, a lot of baloney. Numerous climatologists around
> > the world dismiss global warming as a myth, especially the notion that
> > mankind is causing the globe to heat by the use of hydrocarbons and
> > other allegedly environmentally destructive practices.
>
> Nope. There aren't "numerous climatologists" saying any
> such thing. There are are only a handful and even most
> of them are just questioning the degree of natural versus
> unnatural. They are still in a tiny minority.
Damn tardboy, I'm convinced that you believe your cult dogma.
As socialist sophists go - you're not very good.
> > Scores of top climatologists continue to scoff at the claims of the
> > global warming alarmists and deny that the matter is settled.
>
> Again, no. There aren't "scores of top climatologists"
> saying any such thing. You can count on one hand the
> "top climatologists" who are even mildly disagreeing with
> the main scientific consensus on the matter.
> guarantee that article was responsible for von Storch
> appearing before that US committee questioning the
> "Hockey Stick" model: the committee was strictly a
> witch hunt by
>
> Republican Joe Barton, one of congress's better known
> anti-science, global warming skeptics intended to cast
> aspersions on Mann's "hockey stick model" in particular
> and the idea of human-caused global warming in general
> by calling to testify a German scientist, Dr. Hans von
> Storch, who had written an article about the politics of
> global warming. Fortunately things did not turn out as
> Barton probably had hoped for:
Non sequitur sophist dodo, tardboy.
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4693855.stm
> http://energycommerce.house.gov/108/Hearings/07192006hearing1987/hearing.htm.
> http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/esthag-w/2005/aug/business/pt_wsj.html
> http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jun2006/2006-06-22-10.asp
> http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/archives/060619_ushouse_energycommercehvs.pdf
>
> It's the right wing and big business who have politicized
> all this stuff and who have been trying to discredit the
> real, bona fide researchers and experts in this by
> whatever means possible. They are not the good guys.
> Sorry.
Damn tardboy, I'm convinced that you believe your cult dogma.
As socialist sophists go - you're not very good.
Try your sophist shit on this:
http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p333.htm
Have all of these scientists recanted and gone over to the agw dark
side?
Are all of these scientists right-wing bad guys?
Global Warming Petition
We urge the United States government to reject the global warming
agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any
other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would
harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and
damage the health and welfare of mankind.
There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon
dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the
foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's
atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate. Moreover, there is
substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon
dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and
animal environments of the Earth.
more than 17,100 basic and applied American scientists, two-thirds with
advanced degrees, have signed the Global Warming Petition.
Signers of this petition so far include 2,660 physicists,
geophysicists, climatologists, meteorologists, oceanographers, and
environmental scientists (select this link for a listing of these
individuals) who are especially well qualified to evaluate the effects
of carbon dioxide on the Earth's atmosphere and climate.
Signers of this petition also include 5,017 scientists whose fields of
specialization in chemistry, biochemistry, biology, and other life
sciences (select this link for a listing of these individuals) make
them especially well qualified to evaluate the effects of carbon
dioxide upon the Earth's plant and animal life.
Nearly all of the initial 17,100 scientist signers have technical
training suitable for the evaluation of the relevant research data, and
many are trained in related fields. In addition to these 17,100,
approximately 2,400 individuals have signed the petition who are
trained in fields other than science or whose field of specialization
was not specified on their returned petition.
Of the 19,700 signatures that the project has received in total so far,
17,800 have been independently verified and the other 1,900 have not
yet been independently verified. Of those signers holding the degree of
PhD, 95% have now been independently verified. One name that was sent
in by enviro pranksters, Geri Halliwell, PhD, has been eliminated.
Several names, such as Perry Mason and Robert Byrd are still on the
list even though enviro press reports have ridiculed their identity
with the names of famous personalities. They are actual signers. Perry
Mason, for example, is a PhD Chemist.
The costs of this petition project have been paid entirely by private
donations. No industrial funding or money from sources within the coal,
oil, natural gas or related industries has been utilized. The
petition's organizers, who include some faculty members and staff of
the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, do not otherwise receive
funds from such sources. The Institute itself has no such funding.
Also, no funds of tax-exempt organizations have been used for this
project.
The signatures and the text of the petition stand alone and speak for
themselves. These scientists have signed this specific document. They
are not associated with any particular organization. Their signatures
represent a strong statement about this important issue by many of the
best scientific minds in the United States.
This project is titled "Petition Project" and uses a mailing address of
its own because the organizers desired an independent, individual
opinion from each scientist based on the scientific issues involved -
without any implied endorsements of individuals, groups, or
institutions.
You really need to expand your sophist shit past the "handful" mantra,
john fernbach
"Tardboy" -- meaning, I don't agree with you; please go away.
"femmie" and "you go girl," and the like -- meaning, I don't agree with
you, please go away
"socialist sophists" and the like - meaning, I don't agree with you,
please go away.
Whatever content there is (or isn't) to what Bawana is writing, these
names are just "ad hominem" attacks, just attempts to discredit or
intimidate Bawana's opponents through insults. And some of the insults
are factually wrong, pure hot air.
Is there any sane person, on any side of the global climate issue, who
really thinks the public should make important decisions about CO2
emissions and climate change, based on which side is best at
name-calling?
No. This style of debate is crap.
But what Bawana writes about "liberals" is especially stupid and
misleading, because a number of the most prominent AGW researchers, and
the people who are following them, are not "liberals" at all.
Do a little google search, and you'll quickly find that some of the
public figures who have emphasized the necessity of the world coping
with climate change include:
1. Britain's former prime minister MARGARET THATCHER, the "Iron Lady"
who was a key leader of the Conservative Party in the 1980s
2. The British Conservative Party's current leader, David Cameron, who
in 2006 gained headlines in England partly by calling for a strong UK
effort to curb global climate change.
3. US Senator John McCain (Republican - Arizona), a Republican
candidate for the presidential nomination in 2000 and a possible GOP
candidate for president in 2008
4. The directors of the famous UK insurance syndicate Lloyds of London
5. The management of the Swiss reinsurance company "Swiss Re"
6. The CEOs of Royal Dutch/Shell and BP petroleum companies, both of
whom have declared that it's urgently necessary for Western industry as
well as Western governments to tackle CO2 emissions and climate change
7. The CEO of Cinergy corporation here in the US, a big utility
holding company with extensive interests in coal-fired power generation
8. The administration of George W. Bush, which has declared global
climate change to be an important problem, but has urged that the US
address that problem through "voluntary" programs rather than
government regulation of the coal and oil companies, and that continues
to oppose US participation in the Kyoto Treaty
9. James Hansen of the Godard Space Flight Center at NASA, the US
climate researcher who made world headlines in 1988 when he testified
before Congress that a "definite" signal of anthropogenic climate
change had been detected that year. Hansen's web site indicates that
he was raised as a Mormon, and that he normally considers himself a
moderate Republican, with a preference for John McCain as a
presidential candidate.
10. Fox news executive and global press lord Rupert Murdoch, one of
the most prominent backers of conservative causes in the world, who has
publicly declared that he thinks greenhouse-induced climate change is
an urgent problem, and whose company funded the production of the
controversial global climate movie "The Day After Tomorrow."
11. Rev. Pat Robertson, prominent leader of the American religious
right and a former candidate for the GOP presidential nomination.
12. Reverend Rick Warren, author of "The Purpose Driven Life" and
pastor of one of the American religious right's largest
"mega-churches," who is a supporter of the Evangelical Climate
Initiative calling for world action to head off a global warming
disaster.
--------------------------
Bawana and other AGW denialists love to paint all supporters of global
climate science as "liberals" or "socialists," but it's obvious that
none of the figures mentioned above fits into either of those
categories. Bawana is lying.
Bawana also cites as "proof" of his lies a petition questioning
mainstream science that was organized by the Oregon Institute on
Scientific Affairs, and a little Google research will show that the
petition has been exposed as at least partly bogus.
Some of the names on the list are of non-existent people; many of them
are the names of scientists whose fields of study have little to do
with the climate, and at least some of the scientists whose names were
included on the petition have stated publicly that they never signed
the thing.
Bawana is peddling bullshit -- and it's not even "conservative"
bullshit, because a number of conservatives don't believe in it. A
typical snow job by a professional apologist for the fossil fuel
industry, it looks like.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Bawana wrote:
> BC wrote:
> > Bawana wrote:
> > > BC wrote:
> > > .
> > >
> > > Damn tardboy, that exactly how I feel about the despicable UN's IPCC
> > > and the other agw consensus tards.
> > >
> > > All of the Globaloney fanatics ....
>
> Damn tardboy, I'm convinced that you believe your cult dogma.
>
> As socialist sophists go - you're not very good.
>
> Non sequitur sophist dodo, tardboy.
>
>
> Damn tardboy, I'm convinced that you believe your cult dogma.
>
> As socialist sophists go - you're not very good.
>
> Try your sophist shit on this:
>
>
> Liberals. Always trapped by the truth and nailed by logic.
>
> Bhaaaawwwaaaawwwwaaaawwwaaaaaaa!!!!!
>
-----------------------------> A
Bawana
john fernbach wrote:
> <verbiage of an old socialist queen snipped>
> But what Bawana writes about "liberals" is especially stupid and
> misleading, because a number of the most prominent AGW researchers, and
> the people who are following them, are not "liberals" at all.
Which "prominent AGW researchers" are not liberals?
> <verbiage of an old socialist queen snipped>
> Bawana also cites as "proof" of his lies a petition questioning
> mainstream science that was organized by the Oregon Institute on
> Scientific Affairs, and a little Google research will show that the
> petition has been exposed as at least partly bogus.
> Some of the names on the list are of non-existent people;
Nearly all of the initial 17,100 scientist signers have technical
training suitable for the evaluation of the relevant research data, and
many are trained in related fields. In addition to these 17,100,
approximately 2,400 individuals have signed the petition who are
trained in fields other than science or whose field of specialization
was not specified on their returned petition.
Of the 19,700 signatures that the project has received in total so far,
17,800 have been independently verified and the other 1,900 have not
yet been independently verified. Of those signers holding the degree of
PhD, 95% have now been independently verified. One name that was sent
in by enviro pranksters, Geri Halliwell, PhD, has been eliminated.
Several names, such as Perry Mason and Robert Byrd are still on the
list even though enviro press reports have ridiculed their identity
with the names of famous personalities. They are actual signers. Perry
Mason, for example, is a PhD Chemist.
The costs of this petition project have been paid entirely by private
donations. No industrial funding or money from sources within the coal,
oil, natural gas or related industries has been utilized. The
petition's organizers, who include some faculty members and staff of
the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, do not otherwise receive
funds from such sources. The Institute itself has no such funding.
Also, no funds of tax-exempt organizations have been used for this
project.
> <verbiage of an old socialist queen snipped>
BC
Bawana wrote:
> BC wrote:
> > Bawana wrote:
> > > BC wrote:
> > > > Bawana wrote:
> > >
> > > > You can find plenty of "experts" claiming that the moon
> > > > landing was staged or that it was the US that deliberately
> > > > imploded the World Trade Center towers, but that doesn't
> > > > exactly mean that makes them right.
> > >
> > > Damn tardboy, that exactly how I feel about the despicable UN's IPCC
> > > and the other agw consensus tards.
> > >
> > > All of the Globaloney fanatics are repeating the same theme: global
> > > warming is a fact attested to by the worlds scientific community, and
> > > that it is no longer an issue but an accepted scientific fact.
> > >
> > > That is, of course, a lot of baloney. Numerous climatologists around
> > > the world dismiss global warming as a myth, especially the notion that
> > > mankind is causing the globe to heat by the use of hydrocarbons and
> > > other allegedly environmentally destructive practices.
> >
> > Nope. There aren't "numerous climatologists" saying any
> > such thing. There are are only a handful and even most
> > of them are just questioning the degree of natural versus
> > unnatural. They are still in a tiny minority.
>
> Damn tardboy, I'm convinced that you believe your cult dogma.
Let's see if Google Groups doesn't screw up again...
Let's be clear about one thing -- it's you global warming
deniers that are on the Anti-science, Cult-religion, Don't
Have a Friggin Clue shelves of the library. The mainstream
scientists who write for peer-reviewed scientific journals,
who are acknowledged experts in their fields, who get
menitoned and nominated for awards and grants think
all of you global warming deniers are a symptom of a
bad, disturbing anti-science mentality apparently
growing in American society.
Now that we have that out of the way....
>
> As socialist sophists go - you're not very good.
Can you say "non sequitur"?
>
> > > Scores of top climatologists continue to scoff at the claims of the
> > > global warming alarmists and deny that the matter is settled.
> >
> > Again, no. There aren't "scores of top climatologists"
> > saying any such thing. You can count on one hand the
> > "top climatologists" who are even mildly disagreeing with
> > the main scientific consensus on the matter.
> > guarantee that article was responsible for von Storch
> > appearing before that US committee questioning the
> > "Hockey Stick" model: the committee was strictly a
> > witch hunt by
> >
> > Republican Joe Barton, one of congress's better known
> > anti-science, global warming skeptics intended to cast
> > aspersions on Mann's "hockey stick model" in particular
> > and the idea of human-caused global warming in general
> > by calling to testify a German scientist, Dr. Hans von
> > Storch, who had written an article about the politics of
> > global warming. Fortunately things did not turn out as
> > Barton probably had hoped for:
>
> Non sequitur sophist dodo, tardboy.
>
You actually don't know what "non sequitur" or "sophist"
means, do you? Did you run across these terms in one
of your anti-science sites?
> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4693855.stm
> > http://energycommerce.house.gov/108/Hearings/07192006hearing1987/hearing.htm.
> > http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/esthag-w/2005/aug/business/pt_wsj.html
> > http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jun2006/2006-06-22-10.asp
> > http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/archives/060619_ushouse_energycommercehvs.pdf
> >
> > It's the right wing and big business who have politicized
> > all this stuff and who have been trying to discredit the
> > real, bona fide researchers and experts in this by
> > whatever means possible. They are not the good guys.
> > Sorry.
>
> Damn tardboy, I'm convinced that you believe your cult dogma.
>
> As socialist sophists go - you're not very good.
>
> Try your sophist shit on this:
>
> http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p333.htm
Um, you're not going to like this, but oism.org is not just
another right-wing site , but one run by an "eccentric"
(aka "old crackpot") scientist:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/wiki.phtml?title=Oregon_Institute_of_Science_and_Medicine
>
> Have all of these scientists recanted and gone over to the agw dark
> side?
How many of them are climatologists or have any legitimate
expertise in planetary science? Let's go take a look at the
first ones on that list, shall we:
Earl Aagaard, PhD
http://biology.southern.edu/gullo.html
Biologist
Research Interests:
Intelligent design; Relation of Man to his environment
"Intelligent design"!? Hah. Not a climatologist in any
case.
Roger L Aamodt, PhD
A physician who works at the National Cancer Institute,
Rockville, MD. A medical doctor, not a climate scientist.
M Robert Aaron
http://www.ieee.org/web/aboutus/history_center/biography/aaron.html
A retired electrical engineer, not a scientist
Ralph F Abate
http://buffalo.citysearch.com/profile/7753405/buffalo_ny/abate_ralph_f_pe_abate_engineering_associates.html
A contract or "professional" engineer, again not a
scientist.
Hamed Abbas, PhD
http://www.apsnet.org/members/com/Cmtes_detail.cfm?Code=BIOCONTROL
A plant pathologist, or Phytopathologist, not a climate
scientist.
Reza Abbaschian, PhD
http://www.tms.org/Society/Honors/2000/Fellows2000.html
Another engineer, not a scientist.
Paul Abbett
No info -- his name pops up on re-posts of the petition, but
that's all. At the very least, non-expert in whatever field he's
in unless his name is misspelled or he doesn't actually
exist.
Wyatt E Abbitt III
See Paul Abbett
David M Abbott Jr
http://www.geotimes.org/jan05/feature_miningfraud.html
"A geologist for the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC)" Not a climate scientist
Ursula K Abbott, PhD
http://www.landfood.ubc.ca/alumni_history/poultry_science.htm
I'll grant that she knows her poultry, but that doesn't
make her a climate scientist, does it?
There we go -- I Googled the first 10 names off that
Oism.org petition list and not only are none of them
relevant experts, but some aren't even really scientist
and a couple don't even seem to exist. I think it's safe
to assume that this represents what that entire long-
ass list is like.
That's your side, which again has nothing scientific
to offer to rebut the findings of, you know, the guys
who actually are climate and planetary scientists
and who are actually engaged in active research and
science in regards to all this.
Now, isn't it about time you go to one of the custom
cap kiosks you sometimes see in malls and get one
that goes, "I'm a crackpot, ask me why"?
Now shoo and don't bother us adults and sane people
anymore.
-BC
kT
Nice rant.
You realize you're just talking to some punk kid, though, right?
--
The Tsiolkovsky Group : http://www.lifeform.org
My Planetary BLOB : http://cosmic.lifeform.org
Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator :
BC
I usually recycle the research I come up with in
these Usenet debates/flamewars/ass-whippings,
so punk kid or not, it's always good.
-BC
Bawana
BC wrote:
> Bawana wrote:
> > BC wrote:
> > > Bawana wrote:
> > > > BC wrote:
> > > > > Bawana wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > You can find plenty of "experts" claiming that the moon
> > > > > landing was staged or that it was the US that deliberately
> > > > > imploded the World Trade Center towers, but that doesn't
> > > > > exactly mean that makes them right.
> > > >
> > > > Damn tardboy, that exactly how I feel about the despicable UN's IPCC
> > > > and the other agw consensus tards.
> > > >
> > > > All of the Globaloney fanatics are repeating the same theme: global
> > > > warming is a fact attested to by the worlds scientific community, and
> > > > that it is no longer an issue but an accepted scientific fact.
> > > >
> > > > That is, of course, a lot of baloney. Numerous climatologists around
> > > > the world dismiss global warming as a myth, especially the notion that
> > > > mankind is causing the globe to heat by the use of hydrocarbons and
> > > > other allegedly environmentally destructive practices.
> > >
> > > Nope. There aren't "numerous climatologists" saying any
> > > such thing. There are are only a handful and even most
> > > of them are just questioning the degree of natural versus
> > > unnatural. They are still in a tiny minority.
> >
> > Damn tardboy, I'm convinced that you believe your cult dogma.
> Let's be clear about one thing --
Yes. You're a good little cult turd.
I'm convinced that you believe your cult dogma.
Clear.
> > Try your sophist shit on this:
> >
> > http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p333.htm
>
> Um, you're not going to like this, but oism.org is not just
> another right-wing site , but one run by an "eccentric"
> (aka "old crackpot") scientist:
Standard cult dogma answer.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/wiki.phtml?title=Oregon_Institute_of_Science_and_Medicine
Standard left-wing cult cite.
> > Have all of these scientists recanted and gone over to the agw dark
> > side?
>
> How many of them are climatologists or have any legitimate
> expertise in planetary science? Let's go take a look at the
> first ones on that list, shall we:
more than 17,100 basic and applied American scientists, two-thirds with
> Earl Aagaard, PhD
You only have 17,090 more to go, ya lazy cultist.
I'm convinced that you believe your cult dogma.
That's all you have spewed. Nothing new or original.
Now, come on BigCunt, make me really laugh...
What are your solutions to the supposed agw apocalypse?
Dazzle me with your dogma.
Bawana
BigCunt wrote:
> kunT wrote:
> > Nice rant.
> >
> > You realize you're just talking to some punk kid, though, right?
>
> I usually recycle the research I come up with ...
Yep, you sure do...along with every other agw cult tard.
Nothing new or original coming out of your pie hole, eh BigCunt?
BC
Ahhh, I see now -- if you call it a "cult site," that
means it's factual; if you call it "socialist," that
means it's scientific; if you call it "dogma," that
means it's logical. What do you call your form
of lingo -- Retardonics?
>
> > > Have all of these scientists recanted and gone over to the agw dark
> > > side?
> >
> > How many of them are climatologists or have any legitimate
> > expertise in planetary science? Let's go take a look at the
> > first ones on that list, shall we:
>
> more than 17,100 basic and applied American scientists, two-thirds with
> advanced degrees, have signed the Global Warming Petition.
>
> Signers of this petition so far include 2,660 physicists,
> geophysicists, climatologists, meteorologists, oceanographers, and
> environmental scientists (select this link for a listing of these
> individuals) who are especially well qualified to evaluate the effects
> of carbon dioxide on the Earth's atmosphere and climate.
Then it should be easy for you to find, say, three, who
are active researchers in climatology or some related
field. I checked the first 10 on that list and there were
none like that, which puts the ball in your court -- why
should we believe that anything on that list is legit if
it starts right off as demonstrable BS? Also, there is
this:
http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Corrupt_Sallie_Baliunas.html
So go find just 3 legitimate scientists *active* in climate
research (doddering old retirees don't count) whose
names are on that petition. I already eliminated the 1st
10 for you but tat still leaves you 17,090. Knock yourself
out.
-BC
Bawana
Yep. Left-wing delusional groupspeak/doublethink.
Yawn, so 1945ish.
> What do you call your form
> of lingo --
Descriptive English.
> > > > Have all of these scientists recanted and gone over to the agw dark
> > > > side?
> > >
> > > How many of them are climatologists or have any legitimate
> > > expertise in planetary science? Let's go take a look at the
> > > first ones on that list, shall we:
> >
> > more than 17,100 basic and applied American scientists, two-thirds with
> > advanced degrees, have signed the Global Warming Petition.
> >
> > Signers of this petition so far include 2,660 physicists,
> > geophysicists, climatologists, meteorologists, oceanographers, and
> > environmental scientists (select this link for a listing of these
> > individuals) who are especially well qualified to evaluate the effects
> > of carbon dioxide on the Earth's atmosphere and climate.
>
> Then it should be easy for you to find, say, three, who
> are active researchers in climatology or some related
> field. I checked the first 10 on that list and there were
> none like that, which puts the ball in your court -- why
> should we believe that anything on that list is legit if
> it starts right off as demonstrable BS? Also, there is
> this:
> http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Corrupt_Sallie_Baliunas.html
Looney Tunes left-wing globaloney.
More evidence that you lib-turds have no shame.
> So go find just 3 legitimate scientists *active* in climate
> research (doddering old retirees don't count)
Old retirees DO count.
They don't have to worry about funding.
Scientists know that continued funding depends on delivering the
results the funders desire.
That's why the findings of IPCC is suspect at best.
Keeeeeerrrrist, they are funded by the UN.
> whose
> names are on that petition. I already eliminated the 1st
> 10 for you but tat still leaves you 17,090. Knock yourself
> out.
Lazy lib-turd. You've proved nothing except your penchant for left-wing
dogma.
Nothing new there...you're like every other agw cult tard.
I could give you many more names and cites but your brain has been
dry-cleaned.
It's all bullshit anyway...it has nothing to do with worthless "climate
science".
The global warming campaign is the last gasp of the thoroughly
discredited system of socialism. Follow the path down which the Al
Gores and Mikhail Gorbachev's want to lead us and you will find
yourself in a world ruled by a Marxist United Nations.
So tell me, BigCunt, what are your solutions to the supposed agw
apocalypse?
A new UN oil-for-food like bureaucracy?
(can your pea-brain make a shift or will it turn to soup?)
BC
Why do I sense that the sound of a chicken is
forthcoming rather the three names I dared you
to come up with....
>
> > So go find just 3 legitimate scientists *active* in climate
> > research (doddering old retirees don't count)
>
> Old retirees DO count.
> They don't have to worry about funding.
In other words, "Aark, paark-paark-paark, aark..."
>
> Scientists know that continued funding depends on delivering the
> results the funders desire.
Some more, "Aark, paark-paark-paark, aark..."
>
> That's why the findings of IPCC is suspect at best.
Yet more, "Aark, paark-paark-paark, aark..."
>
> Keeeeeerrrrist, they are funded by the UN.
Yet again, "Aark, paark-paark-paark, aark..."
>
> > whose
> > names are on that petition. I already eliminated the 1st
> > 10 for you but tat still leaves you 17,090. Knock yourself
> > out.
>
> Lazy lib-turd. You've proved nothing except your penchant for left-wing
> dogma.
"Aark, paark-paark-paark, aark..."
>
> Nothing new there...you're like every other agw cult tard.
"Aark, paark-paark-paark, aark..."
>
> I could give you many more names and cites but your brain has been
> dry-cleaned.
"Aark, paark-paark-paark, aark..."
>
> It's all bullshit anyway...it has nothing to do with worthless "climate
> science".
"Aark, paark-paark-paark, aark..."
>
> The global warming campaign is the last gasp of the thoroughly
> discredited system of socialism. Follow the path down which the Al
> Gores and Mikhail Gorbachev's want to lead us and you will find
> yourself in a world ruled by a Marxist United Nations.
"Aark, paark-paark-paark, aark..."
>
> So tell me, BigCunt, what are your solutions to the supposed agw
> apocalypse?
"Aark, paark-paark-paark, aark..."
>
> A new UN oil-for-food like bureaucracy?
"Aark, paark-paark-paark, aark..."
>
> (can your pea-brain make a shift or will it turn to soup?)
"Aark, paark-paark-paark, aark..."
So you can't come up with even just three active
researchers in climatology or something related
who signed off on that dumbass "petition" -- gosh
and golly, what a surprise. Nice chicken sounds,
though.
-BC
Bawana
Wow! A dare!
Any names I give will be met with "right-winger" "creationist"
"tobacco" "big oil" or some such left-wing cult kaka.
You have proved that already.
Yawn.
All of the Globaloney fanatics are repeating the same theme: global
warming is a fact attested to by the worlds scientific community, and
that it is no longer an issue but an accepted scientific fact.
That is, of course, a lot of baloney. Numerous climatologists around
the world dismiss global warming as a myth, especially the notion that
mankind is causing the globe to heat by the use of hydrocarbons s and
other allegedly environmentally destructive practices.
That flies in the face of the petition signed in April 1998 by more
than 18,000 scientists, two-thirds of whom held advanced academic
degrees and who urged the U.S. Government to reject the Kyoto Accord
which called for drastic cuts in energy use in this nation which
President Bush noted would cost this nation alone 5 million jobs.
Said the petition: "Research data on climate change do not show that
human use of hydrocarbons is harmful. To the contrary there is good
evidence that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide is environmentally
helpful."
Scores of top climatologists continue to scoff at the claims of the
BC
Well, if they are "'right-winger' 'creationist'
'tobacco' 'big oil' or some such'"...
Gray is a meteorologist -- like those weather
folks on your local news -- and not a climate
scientist.
In other words, just some more "Aark, paark-paark-
paark, aark..."
-BC
Bawana
BC/BamboozledChump wrote:
> > Any names I give will be met with "right-winger" "creationist"
> > "tobacco" "big oil" or some such left-wing cult kaka.
>
> Well, if they are "'right-winger' 'creationist'
> 'tobacco' 'big oil' or some such'"...
That doesn't necessarily make them wrong, does it BamboozledChump?
I'll take their words over the words of some Usenet groupthink
BamboozledChump left-tard any day.
I'll take their words over the words of some UN 'oil-for-food like'
IPCC globaloney doomsday propagandist any day.
Doomsday grifters have run their scam a long time and they've never
lacked for chumps to bamboozle.
BC = BamboozledChump
----------------------------------------------
http://www.saveportland.com/Climate/index.html
--------------------------------------------------
Kary Mullis, Nobel, Chemistry:
"The global warmers ... predict that global warming is coming, and
our emissions are to blame. They do that to keep us worried about our
role in the whole thing. If we aren't worried and guilty, we might not
pay their salaries. It's that simple."
-----------------------------------------------
"The continued rapid cooling if the earth since World War II is
also in accord with increased global air pollution associated with
industrialism, urbanization, and exploding population..."
- Reid Bryson, longtime eco-deep-thinker, 1971.
"There are ominous signs that the earth's weather patterns have
begun to change dramatically and that these changes may portend a
drastic decline in food production - with serious political
implications for just about ever nation on earth."
- Peter Gynne, Newsweek, 1975
"The facts have emerged, in recent years and months, from research
into past ice ages. They imply that the threat of a new ice age must
now stand alongside nuclear war as the likely source of wholesale death
and misery for mankind"
- Nigel Calder, former editor of the New Scientist, 1975.
Ray Lopez Licks Exxon Butt
Bawana wrote:
> BC/BamboozledChump wrote:
>
> > > Any names I give will be met with "right-winger" "creationist"
> > > "tobacco" "big oil" or some such left-wing cult kaka.
> >
> > Well, if they are "'right-winger' 'creationist'
> > 'tobacco' 'big oil' or some such'"...
> ----------------------------------------------
> http://www.saveportland.com/Climate/index.html
> --------------------------------------------------
> Kary Mullis, Nobel, Chemistry:
>
> "The global warmers ... predict that global warming is coming, and
> our emissions are to blame. They do that to keep us worried about our
> role in the whole thing. If we aren't worried and guilty, we might not
> pay their salaries. It's that simple."
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> "The continued rapid cooling if the earth since World War II is
> also in accord with increased global air pollution associated with
> industrialism, urbanization, and exploding population..."
>
> - Reid Bryson, longtime eco-deep-thinker, 1971.
>
> "There are ominous signs that the earth's weather patterns have
> begun to change dramatically and that these changes may portend a
> drastic decline in food production - with serious political
> implications for just about ever nation on earth."
>
> - Peter Gynne, Newsweek, 1975
>
> "The facts have emerged, in recent years and months, from research
> into past ice ages. They imply that the threat of a new ice age must
> now stand alongside nuclear war as the likely source of wholesale death
> and misery for mankind"
>
> - Nigel Calder, former editor of the New Scientist, 1975.
Just when I think I've read the stupidest post ever, you go and post
another. How about putting that into proper syntax, form, and grammar
so that I can at least understand what you are saying before I dismiss
it?
Keep typing. Maybe, someday, you'll randomly type something
semi-intelligent. You must have a very large brain to hold such a vast
amount of sheer ignorance. You've got a big hole in your head, now shut
it. When you are at a loss for words, your loss is our gain. You bring
to mind a quote from Josh Billing: "Doesn't know much, but leads the
league in nostril hair."
You are a bore, and a very dull one at that. Do yourself and everyone
else a favor: take a fatal overdose of your medication. Maybe you
wouldn't be such a Jerk-In-The-Box if you weren't living proof that
stupid people should not breed; if your weren't so fat that when you
stand on the weighing scale, it reads: "To be continued!", or if you
didn't have a face that would give Freddie Kruger nightmares. Who am I
kidding? You would.
Anyway, I'm not really good with fools, but a friend who is good with
fools wrote something down for me. Oh, yeah, "Shut your cake-hole,
stupid!"
Bawana
> Just when I think ...
Liar.
davee
what goes 'Mark mark mark ' a dog with a hare lip.
BC
Hope this clarifies.
-BC
kdt...@yahoo.com
Their propaganda is the only thing they have going for them. If the
question of 'science' arises with Al Gore, he says "there is no
debate", That way he has finished the idea. No more to talk about
science or physics or anything. This flat lie should not go unnoticed.
No debate, All them smart scientists are in agreement.
In the meantime,,
No direct laboratory proof that CO2 can cause higher temperatures
No definition of global warming,,, to change the temperature of the
earth 1degC requires 1500Wm-2 over every sq meter of surface area for
100 years
The initial defintion of temperature from recieved radiation from the
sun is total joke, 1000Wm-2 is recieved in a solar collector at solar
noon at the equator
Absorption bands are actually bands of low emission in the continous
spectra. Do not affect temperature at all in the atmosphere.
Any detected evidence of warming of the oceans proves another cause for
temperature fluctuation as it is absolutely impossible for heat to be
transfered from the atmosphere at such low levels in 100 years by any
analyses of the thermodynamics. 40600 Joules are absorbed for each mole
of water on evaporation. Slight increases in air temperature increases
the capacity of the air to hold water and the rate of evaporation. Not
possible for the slight increase in air temperture to relay heat to the
ocean or reduce the rate of heat loss from the ocean. Molar density of
water, 18 cc, Molar density of air 22,000 cc stp. heat capacity of
water 75.4 Joules/deg/mol, Heat capacity of air 29 Joules/deg/mol.
There are many more glaring invalidities in this false theory. In fact
from beginning to end.
Grenhouse theory is a house of cards of invallid theoretical physics.
Who cares what the climatologists supposedly agree on. Valid analyses
can prove the invalidity of the postulate of AGW, or variation of gases
in the atmosphere to cause dangerous warming or any warming at all.
There are records of much fluctuation in the earth's temperature.
Between the ice ages, the earth is actually 5 degrees C below average.
Deatherage
CO2Phobia is a dangerous and fatal disease like rabies
Roger Coppock
When will you learn?
Bawana
BamboozledChump thought and pushed and grunted before he squeezed:
> To shove up his butt so he can talk sh*t.
>
> Hope this clarifies.
Sniff, sniff, sniff...
What's that infecund odor???
Smells like...
Groupstink.
Wafting from BamboozledChump.
Same shit - different day.
BC = BamboozledChump = lib-tard waft-land
BC
Yeah, go back over 30 years and pretend there hasn't
been any new research or refinement of theories since.
Maybe you right wing neocons and fake-ass "libertarians"
are the new Amish and just want to ignore all the bad,
disturbing stuff science has discovered since, say, the
early 60's. Let's go back to smoking Lucky Strikes, using
DDT, and planning on giving every town it's own nuke so
that you wouldn't even have to bother to meter the electrical
use.
-BC
Bawana
> Yeah, go back over 30 years and pretend there hasn't
> been any new research or refinement of theories since.
That would fall under:
Doomsday grifters have run their scam a long time and they've never
lacked for chumps to bamboozle.
Also:
Groupstink wafting from BamboozledChump.
> Maybe you right wing neocons and fake-ass "libertarians"
> are the new Amish and just want to ignore all the bad,
> disturbing stuff science has discovered since,
That would fall under:
Doomsday grifters have run their scam a long time and they've never
lacked for chumps to bamboozle.
Also:
Groupstink wafting from BamboozledChump.
> say, the
> early 60's. Let's go back to smoking Lucky Strikes,
Groupstink wafting from BamboozledChump.
Doomsday grifters have run their scam a long time and they've never
lacked for chumps to bamboozle.
All things in moderation.
> using DDT,
Groupstink wafting from BamboozledChump.
Doomsday grifters have run their scam a long time and they've never
lacked for chumps to bamboozle.
It's safe enough to eat.
> and planning on giving every town it's own nuke so
> that you wouldn't even have to bother to meter the electrical
> use.
Groupstink wafting from BamboozledChump.
Doomsday grifters have run their scam a long time and they've never
lacked for chumps to bamboozle.
Let's start that idea yesterday.
Exxon Pays Liars
bowling alley for this kind of intellectual stimulation.
Bawana wrote:
> Doomsday grifters have run their scam a long time and they've never
> lacked for chumps to bamboozle.
> Let's start that idea yesterday.
http://www.ucsusa.org/news/press_release/ExxonMobil-GlobalWarming-tobacco.html
Scientists' Report Documents ExxonMobil's Tobacco-like Disinformation
Campaign on Global Warming Science
Oil Company Spent Nearly $16 Million to Fund Skeptic Groups, Create
Confusion
ExxonMobil Report
Read the Report
ExxonMobil Report (PDF)
Appendix C (PDF high resolution)
Appendix C (part 1)
Appendix C (part 2)
Appendix C (part 3)
WASHINGTON, DC, Jan. 3-A new report from the Union of Concerned
Scientists offers the most comprehensive documentation to date of how
ExxonMobil has adopted the tobacco industry's disinformation tactics,
as well as some of the same organizations and personnel, to cloud the
scientific understanding of climate change and delay action on the
issue. According to the report, ExxonMobil has funneled nearly $16
million between 1998 and 2005 to a network of 43 advocacy organizations
that seek to confuse the public on global warming science.
"ExxonMobil has manufactured uncertainty about the human causes of
global warming just as tobacco companies denied their product caused
lung cancer," said Alden Meyer, the Union of Concerned Scientists'
Director of Strategy & Policy. "A modest but effective investment has
allowed the oil giant to fuel doubt about global warming to delay
government action just as Big Tobacco did for over 40 years."
Smoke, Mirrors & Hot Air: How ExxonMobil Uses Big Tobacco's Tactics to
"Manufacture Uncertainty" on Climate Change details how the oil
company, like the tobacco industry in previous decades, has
* raised doubts about even the most indisputable scientific
evidence
* funded an array of front organizations to create the appearance
of a broad platform for a tight-knit group of vocal climate change
contrarians who misrepresent peer-reviewed scientific findings
* attempted to portray its opposition to action as a positive quest
for "sound science" rather than business self-interest
* used its access to the Bush administration to block federal
policies and shape government communications on global warming
ExxonMobil-funded organizations consist of an overlapping collection of
individuals serving as staff, board members, and scientific advisors
that publish and re-publish the works of a small group of climate
change contrarians. The George C. Marshall Institute, for instance,
which has received $630,000 from ExxonMobil, recently touted a book
edited by Patrick Michaels, a long-time climate change contrarian who
is affiliated with at least 11 organizations funded by ExxonMobil.
Similarly, ExxonMobil funds a number of lesser-known groups such as the
Annapolis Center for Science-Based Public Policy and Committee for a
Constructive Tomorrow. Both groups promote the work of several climate
change contrarians, including Sallie Baliunas, an astrophysicist who is
affiliated with at least nine ExxonMobil-funded groups.
Baliunas is best known for a 2003 paper alleging the climate had not
changed significantly in the past millennia that was rebutted by 13
scientists who stated she had misrepresented their work in her paper.
This renunciation did not stop ExxonMobil-funded groups from continuing
to promote the paper. Through methods such as these, ExxonMobil has
been able to amplify and prop up work that has been discredited by
reputable climate scientists.
"When one looks closely, ExxonMobil's underhanded strategy is as clear
and indisputable as the scientific research it's meant to discredit,"
said Seth Shulman, an investigative journalist who wrote the UCS
report. "The paper trail shows that, to serve its corporate interests,
ExxonMobil has built a vast echo chamber of seemingly independent
groups with the express purpose of spreading disinformation about
global warming."
ExxonMobil has used the laudable goal of improving scientific
understanding of global warming-under the guise of "sound
science"-for the pernicious ends of delaying action to reduce
heat-trapping emissions indefinitely. ExxonMobil also exerted
unprecedented influence over U.S. policy on global warming, from
successfully recommending the appointment of key personnel in the Bush
administration to funding climate change deniers in Congress.
"As a scientist, I like to think that facts will prevail, and they do
eventually," said Dr. James McCarthy, Alexander Agassiz Professor of
Biological Oceanography at Harvard University and former chair of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's working group on climate
change impacts. "It's shameful that ExxonMobil has sought to obscure
the facts for so long when the future of our planet depends on the
steps we take now and in the coming years."
The burning of oil and other fossil fuels results in additional
atmospheric carbon dioxide that blankets the Earth and traps heat. The
amount of CO2 in the atmosphere has increased greatly over the last
century and global temperatures are rising as a result. Though
solutions are available now that will cut global warming emissions
while creating jobs, saving consumers money, and protecting our
national security, ExxonMobil has manufactured confusion around climate
change science, and these actions have helped to forestall meaningful
action that could minimize the impacts of future climate change.
"ExxonMobil needs to be held accountable for its cynical disinformation
campaign on global warming," said Meyer. "Consumers, shareholders and
Congress should let the company know loud and clear that its behavior
on this issue is unacceptable and must change."
Vendicar Decarian
<kdt...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> Grenhouse theory is a house of cards of invallid theoretical physics.
> Who cares what the climatologists supposedly agree on. Valid analyses
> can prove the invalidity of the postulate of AGW, or variation of gases
> in the atmosphere to cause dangerous warming or any warming at all.
Tundra Disappearing At Rapid RateDate - March 7, 2007
-------------------------------------
University of Alberta
The boundary, or treeline, between forest and tundra ecosystems is a
prominent landscape feature in both Arctic and mountain environments.
As
global temperatures continue to increase, the treeline is expected to
advance but the new research shows that this shift will not always
occur
gradually but can surge ahead.
"The conventional thinking on treeline dynamics has been that advances
are
very slow because conditions are so harsh at these high latitudes and
altitudes," said Dr. Ryan Danby, from the Department of Biological
Sciences. "But what our data indicates is that there was an upslope
surge
of trees in response to warmer temperatures. It's like it waited until
conditions were just right and then it decided to get up and run, not
just
walk."
Danby and Dr. David Hik, also from the Faculty of Science,
reconstructed
changes in the density and altitude of treeline forests in
southwestern
Yukon over the past 300 years. Using tree rings, they were able to
date
the year of establishment and death of spruce trees and reconstruct
changes in treeline vegetation. The study is published in the "Journal
of
Ecology."
They found that a rapid change in response to climate warming during
the
early mid 20th century was observed at all locations. Treeline
advanced
considerably--as much as 85 metres elevation--on warm, south-facing
slopes
and tree density increased significantly--as much as 65 per cent--on
cooler, north-facing slopes.
"The mechanism of change appears to be associated with occasional
years of
extraordinarily high seed production--triggered by hot, dry
summers--followed by successive years of warm temperatures favourable
for
seedling growth and survival," said Danby.
Widespread changes to treelines could have significant impacts, says
Danby. As tundra habitats are lost and fragmented, species and
habitats
are forced to move upwards as well. "The problem is that in
mountainous
areas you can only go so high so they get forced into smaller and
smaller
areas," said Danby.
These changes are of particular importance in these northern regions
where
First Nation people still rely heavily on the land, says Danby. Tundra
species like caribou and sheep populations, which are important parts
of
that lifestyle, have declined across southwestern Yukon. As treeline
advance, the reflectance of the land surface declines because
coniferous
trees absorb more sunlight than the tundra. This light energy is then
re-emitted to the atmosphere as heat. This sets up a "positive
feedback,"
the same process that is associated with the rapidly decaying Arctic
ice
cap.
"These results are very relevant to the current debate surrounding
climate
change because they provide real evidence that vegetation change will
be
quite considerable in response to future warming, potentially
transforming
tundra landscapes into open spruce woodlands," said Danby, who will
also
be participating in an International Polar Year project that will be
examining treeline dynamics across the circumpolar north.
Dr. Hik is also executive director of the Canadian International Polar
Year secretariat at the University of Alberta.