Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

10X Warmin' Gonna Stop Next Year! -- Denier

14 views
Skip to first unread message

Bret Cahill

unread,
May 24, 2016, 11:42:20 AM5/24/16
to
> It is Mike's Nature trick again.
> You cannot compare the warming rate of 55 millions years ago with now
> because no record with a comparable sampling rate exist.

Deniers think the warmin' gonna suddenly stop next week?

Actually it's increase to 20X unless we tax carbon.

<CIA>

R Kym Horsell

unread,
May 24, 2016, 3:38:50 PM5/24/16
to
Anything that starts "you can't compare ..." is bound to be igrunt
superstition from that lot.

Numbers like "20" are of no use to deniers. They don't understand numbers
and will try to run away anytime one it mentioned. When it comes to
"statistics" like "20 times" then you have completely lost them.

In a past century psychologists hooked subjects up to meters and
discovered that if you suddenly showed a college kid a picture of
a pouncing tiger their leg muscles would spasm slightly. This was
put down to the bodies undeniable primitive flight and fight response
in action.

When primitive man (or an outback Canadian) saw what their
primitive brain took to be a prey animal in attack mode, the conscious
part of the mind didn't stand much of a chance to prevent at least
a preliminary assessment by the automatic part of the software.

It was all down to evolutionary pressures and Darwin and that stuff
taught in big city colleges.

But never ones to sit on their asses when there was trouble to be made
for other scientists, "they" (we have their names, just in case)
hooked subjects up to meters and showed them numbers and columns of
numbers and times tables and suchlike.

Again, muscles went into preliminary "run away" mode.

Puzzle. Why the Hell is there evolutionary pressure to run away
from numbers?

After millions of years of thinking about this it seems we have
the answer daily on agw.

Numbers are scary. Esp numbers bigger than 1 or 2. (For evolutionary reasons :).

--
The temperature of Heaven can be rather accurately computed. Our
authority is Isaiah 30:26, "Moreover, the light of the Moon shall be as
the light of the Sun and the light of the Sun shall be sevenfold, as
the light of seven days." Thus Heaven receives from the Moon as much
radiation as we do from the Sun, and in addition 7*7 (49) times as much
as the Earth does from the Sun, or 50 times in all. The light we
receive from the Moon is one 1/10,000 of the light we receive from the
Sun, so we can ignore that ... The radiation falling on Heaven will
heat it to the point where the heat lost by radiation is just equal to
the heat received by radiation, i.e., Heaven loses 50 times as much
heat as the Earth by radiation. Using the Stefan-Boltzmann law for
radiation, (H/E)^4 = 50, where E is the absolute temperature of the
earth (-300K), gives H as 798K (525C). The exact temperature of Hell
cannot be computed ... [However] Revelations 21:8 says "But the
fearful, and unbelieving ... shall have their part in the lake which
burneth with fire and brimstone." A lake of molten brimstone means
that its temperature must be at or below the boiling point, 444.6C. We
have, then, that Heaven, at 525C is hotter than Hell at 445C.
-- Applied Optics vol. 11, A14, 1972

Catoni

unread,
May 24, 2016, 3:57:23 PM5/24/16
to
On Tuesday, May 24, 2016 at 11:42:20 AM UTC-4, Bret Cahill wrote:

> Deniers think the warmin' gonna suddenly stop next week?
>
> Actually it's increase to 20X unless we tax carbon.
>
> <CIA>

20X what? Compare to what ? ?

You fail to say...

Catoni

unread,
May 24, 2016, 3:58:37 PM5/24/16
to
On Tuesday, May 24, 2016 at 11:42:20 AM UTC-4, Bret Cahill wrote:

> Deniers think the warmin' gonna suddenly stop next week?
>
> Actually it's increase to 20X unless we tax carbon.


No cite..... so your lying as usual.

AlleyCat

unread,
May 24, 2016, 4:06:21 PM5/24/16
to

On Tue, 24 May 2016 08:42:19 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill says...

>
> > It is Mike's Nature trick again.
> > You cannot compare the warming rate of 55 millions years ago with now
> > because no record with a comparable sampling rate exist.
>
> Deniers think the warmin' gonna suddenly stop next week?

Who said that, denier?

> Actually it's increase to 20X unless we tax carbon.

Prove it that the warming will stop, if someone like Al Gore
or LeonTardo DaCrapio has to pay a little extra in taxes. Prove it.

You're such a fucking idiot... did gasoline usage go down, when prices
went up? Nope. Did gasoline usage go up, when prices went up? Nope.

LOL... you N.Climate deniers are so fucking funny.

> <CIA>

Creep in Attendance? We already knew that, Cellar dweller. Go queek some
heads, nerd.

http://tinypic.com/r/35lztir/8

Bret Cahill

unread,
May 24, 2016, 5:56:27 PM5/24/16
to
> > Actually it's increase to 20X unless we tax carbon.
>
> Prove it that the warming will stop, if someone like Al Gore
> or LeonTardo DaCrapio has to pay a little extra in taxes. Prove it.

"A little extra?"

A progressive carbon tax would bankrupt Al and Leo!

Bret Cahill

unread,
May 24, 2016, 5:57:49 PM5/24/16
to
> > Deniers think the warmin' gonna suddenly stop next week?
> >
> > Actually it's increase to 20X unless we tax carbon.
> >
> > <CIA>
>
> 20X what? Compare to what ? ?

Any natcheral warmin' in the past 65 million years.

Bret Cahill

unread,
May 24, 2016, 5:59:14 PM5/24/16
to
> > Deniers think the warmin' gonna suddenly stop next week?
> >
> > Actually it's increase to 20X unless we tax carbon.

> No cite..... so your lying as usual.

It's up there. Maybe 15X maybe 30X anything natcheral.


Wally W.

unread,
May 24, 2016, 11:13:39 PM5/24/16
to
Bret's specialty: AGNC (ain't got no context).

Catoni

unread,
May 25, 2016, 12:02:49 AM5/25/16
to
You're joking ! When you have the kind of money they have.... there are many ways to keep the state from stealing most of it from you.

AlleyCat

unread,
May 25, 2016, 12:11:05 AM5/25/16
to

On Tue, 24 May 2016 14:56:25 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill says...
Then how will your mommy afford YOU, when she is taxed into bankruptcy?

You think taxing ONLY large corporations, and not the "common folk", will
have ZERO affect on mommy? Ha!

You can not have your pipe dream become a reality... it just won't happen.
Whomever makes the attempt to tax, will be assassinated... simple. Oh,
Obama's trying, but with a Republican Congress? Sorry. If we get a
Republican President... fuhgetaboutit.

Even Trudeau can't tax companies into bankruptcy, without it having a
detrimental affect across the board. EVERYONE would suffer, and NO ONE
would get rich enough to distribute money and power to anyone.

You and your ilk, seem to be against Oligarchies, yet, it seems that if
you taxed the ones you want to tax, Some ONE, or ONE party will rise to
the top. They will have it all... power and money.

If THAT'S what you WANT, let the pitchfork mobs and assassinations begin!

Socialism will NEVER work, in such pluralistic societies, where there are
DUMB ASSES, and people those dumb asses would rely on to get them through
life. The haves and the have-nots will go to war.

There WILL come a tipping point, when the masses of the intelligent and
hard-working people, will say no, and all your dreams of everybody being
"equal" will vanish.

Isn't THAT, after all, what you're shooting for by screeching about
climate change and man-made global warming? Ya... thought so.

Bret Cahill

unread,
May 25, 2016, 12:23:55 AM5/25/16
to
> > > > Actually it's increase to 20X unless we tax carbon.
> > >
> > > Prove it that the warming will stop, if someone like Al Gore
> > > or LeonTardo DaCrapio has to pay a little extra in taxes. Prove it.
> >
> > "A little extra?"
> >
> > A progressive carbon tax would bankrupt Al and Leo!
>
> You're joking ! When you have the kind of money they have.... there are many ways to keep the state from stealing most of it from you.

Not with NSA. The Panama Papers proved what many knew all along:

The reason so few rich Americans were exposed by the P Papers is because rich Americans were tipped off long ago by their tax lawyers that NSA works with the IRS.

Don't try anything cute or you'll be doing time.

You can't even hide cash in PVC fittings in the USA.

That's why the rich send their money to K St lobbyists, the media, Hollywood and Hillary Clinton: To make sure low or no taxes are the law in the first place.

NSA probably knew about the Europeans and Russians but they just don't care.

So if you want to catch the Alberta arsonists, the RCMP are on their own. The NSA may know but they don't want anyone to figure out their methods so they aren't going to help.






Bret Cahill

unread,
May 25, 2016, 12:25:20 AM5/25/16
to
> > > > Actually it's increase to 20X unless we tax carbon.
> > >
> > > Prove it that the warming will stop, if someone like Al Gore
> > > or LeonTardo DaCrapio has to pay a little extra in taxes. Prove it.
> >
> > "A little extra?"
> >
> > A progressive carbon tax would bankrupt Al and Leo!
>
> Then how will your mommy afford YOU, when she is taxed into bankruptcy?

She doesn't spend a lot of time on small planes.


AlleyCat

unread,
May 25, 2016, 12:44:26 AM5/25/16
to

On Tue, 24 May 2016 21:25:18 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill says...
Tax the passengers, tax the plane, tax the companies who fly the planes...
and you'll have higher prices. Higher flight prices will affect something
else, and so on...

ANY time you raise prices or tax ANY item, someone, if not everyone, will
pay more for something, maybe not even related, down the road.

Minimum wage gets raised, people lose jobs, and prices go up. Oh yes...
people will pay, Ray... people will most definitely pay. - Terrence Mann.

Ray... people will pay.

They'll pay taxes for reasons they can't even fathom.

They'll turn up the IRS offices not knowing for sure why they're doing it.

They'll arrive at their door as innocent as children longing for the past,
when there were little or no taxes, especially on carbon.

"Of course we won't mind if you look around" you'll say.

"It's only $200 per person, per year."

They'll pass over the money without even thinking about it.

For it is money they have and cool air they lack.

Then they'll walk out to the bleachers and sit in their shirt sleeves
on a perfect cool afternoon.

They'll find they have reserved seats somewhere along one of the
boulevards where they sat when they were children and cheered their parade
heroes and they'll watch the parade and it will be as if they've dipped
themselves in magic waters.

The memories will be so thick they'll have to brush them away from their
faces.

People will come Ray.

The one constant through all the years Ray, has been warming.

America has rolled by like an army of steamrollers.

It's been erased like a blackboard, warmed up and cooled again.

But warming has marked the time.

This field, this game. It's a part of our past, Ray.

It reminds us of all that once was good and how it could be again.

Oh people will pay, Ray.

People will most definitely pay.

Bret Cahill

unread,
May 25, 2016, 12:58:05 AM5/25/16
to
> > > > > > Actually it's increase to 20X unless we tax carbon.

> > > > > Prove it that the warming will stop, if someone like Al Gore
> > > > > or LeonTardo DaCrapio has to pay a little extra in taxes. Prove it.

> > > > "A little extra?"

> > > > A progressive carbon tax would bankrupt Al and Leo!

> > > Then how will your mommy afford YOU, when she is taxed into bankruptcy?

> > She doesn't spend a lot of time on small planes.

> Tax the passengers, tax the plane, tax the companies who fly the planes...
> and you'll have higher prices.

Good! That's progress.

Regress = higher temps.


AlleyCat

unread,
May 25, 2016, 1:57:39 AM5/25/16
to

On Tue, 24 May 2016 21:58:03 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill says...

> > Tax the passengers, tax the plane, tax the companies who fly the planes...
> > and you'll have higher prices.
>
> Good! That's progress.
>
> Regress = higher temps.
>

You STILL can't prove CO², let alone man's contribution is causing
warming. How exactly can money in someone else's hands cause the
temperatures to go down?

LOL

You REALLY think this is about CO²?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You KNOW it's not.

Queue the expected, "it's a conspiraceeeeee".

Nope... just a money and power grab, ADMITTED by U.N. officials and
scientists.

https://www.google.com/#newwindow=1
&q=admits+manmade+climate+change+is+a+ruse

"UN Official Admits That Climate Change Used As A Ruse To Control The
World's Economy"

Scientist Confesses: "Global Warming a $22 Billion Scam"

Australia PM Advisor Says Climate Change A U.N.-Led Ruse To Create New
World Order

Global Warming Alarmists Caught Doctoring '97-Percent Consensus' Claims

U.N. Official Reveals Real Reason Behind Warming Scare

WHY would Obama want to "silence" deniers?

http://www.gopusa.com/obama-contemplates-silencing-climate-change-deniers/

So his agenda won't be figured out. It's so fucking simple to know it
already, and him wanting to silence "us" only let's us know even MORE,
what he's up to.

Frustrated in its court failures to dictate climate policy above and
beyond Congress, the Obama administration is moving to silence climate
change "deniers" possibly by suing them.

In response to a Senate Judiciary Committee member's concern over a
widespread "climate denier apparatus" that's gumming up the scientific
"consensus," Attorney General Loretta Lynch said she has asked the FBI to
evaluate whether this concern "meets the criteria for which we can take
action." In other words, the administration would silence the scoffers -
many, very reputable scientists - by suing them.

Talk about your fascist dictators. To "silence" anyone, is the greatest
advertisement for what he's up to... anti-capitalism and domination for
the regressive left.

Call it what you want... conspiracy ain't it. "Conspiracy" ain't what you
do... it's how others perceive what you do. There's no "perception"
involved... what Obama and The U.N. are doing is real.

As much has been admitted.

The Top UN Climate Change Official is optimistic that a new international
treaty will be adopted at Paris Climate Change conference at the end of
the year. However the official, Christiana Figueres, the Executive
Secretary of UNFCCC, warns that the fight against climate change is a
process and that the necessary transformation of the world economy will
not be decided at one conference or in one agreement.

LEFTIST/SOCIALIST/COMMUNIST/PROGRESSIVE TYRANTS see the lie of Climate
Change as their way to transform the world economy into their own corrupt
image. As with all such plans, it would ensure a small upper-crust of
well-paid hacks, attending fancy meetings, and luxuriating at YOUR
expense, (well, your mommy's), while the vast majority of the world
suffers in increasing squalor and lack, with no hope of rising above it.

If you think it's bad now (and in many places it's incredibly sad) just
wait till this nonsense prevails, and the wealth of the world shrinks into
oblivion.

Why do you hate Africans, Kymberly?

"According to the World Health Organization four million children under
the age of five die each year from respiratory diseases caused by indoor
smoke and many millions of women die early from cancer and lung disease
for the same reason."

How many more millions of African women and children have to die from
smoke inhalation, before you allow them the cheapest and most affordable
resource of power... coal and oil?

You faux tree hugging deniers forget how racist you really are. Why
deprive undeveloped countries the power of fossil fuels, just to be able
to say that you're supplying the world with "green energy", when YOU'RE
not, really?

Why do you hate Africans? Your "Climate Change plans" kill millions of
people in Africa, every year, because they aren't allowed to become
"modern", with fossil fuel use.

"One clear thing that emerges from the all environmental debate... the
point that there's somebody keen to kill the African dream." - Paul
Driessen, Author "Green Power, Black Death"

http://tinypic.com/r/8ygmtc/8

Green Power, Black Death























0 new messages