Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Nice drop calculator for 1.13

4,262 views
Skip to first unread message

Someone

unread,
Apr 22, 2010, 11:17:51 AM4/22/10
to

Mark P. Nelson

unread,
Apr 23, 2010, 1:40:45 AM4/23/10
to
"Someone" <som...@somewhere.com> wrote in news:4bd110a5$0$5010
$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com:

> I just ran across this:
>
> http://dropcalc.silospen.com/item.php
>
>
>

Looks cool and useful; thanks for the link.

Mark.

--
Verbing weirds language--Calvin

Marcel Overweel

unread,
Apr 23, 2010, 3:28:41 AM4/23/10
to
On 22 apr, 17:17, "Someone" <some...@somewhere.com> wrote:
> I just ran across this:
>
> http://dropcalc.silospen.com/item.php

Thanks Someone.
These things are always useful.

regards,
Marcel

Patrick Vervoorn

unread,
Apr 23, 2010, 3:59:09 AM4/23/10
to
In article <4bd110a5$0$5010$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>,

Someone <som...@somewhere.com> wrote:
>I just ran across this:
>
>http://dropcalc.silospen.com/item.php

Interesting. Played around with it a bit, but couldn't seem to get the
numbers out for runes...?

Did I miss something, or is that not in it?

Regards,

Patrick.

Marcel Overweel

unread,
Apr 23, 2010, 4:09:15 AM4/23/10
to
On 23 apr, 09:59, Patrick Vervoorn
<patrick.vervo...@NOSPAM.perihelion.demon.nl> wrote:
> In article <4bd110a5$0$5010$9a6e1...@unlimited.newshosting.com>,

>
> Someone <some...@somewhere.com> wrote:
> >I just ran across this:
>
> >http://dropcalc.silospen.com/item.php
>
> Interesting. Played around with it a bit, but couldn't seem to get the
> numbers out for runes...?
>
> Did I miss something, or is that not in it?
>
> Regards,
>
> Patrick.

You have to set the item version on the right to 'misc' and leave the
rest on default.

regards,
Marcel

Patrick Vervoorn

unread,
Apr 23, 2010, 12:45:06 PM4/23/10
to
In article <bf07270c-c0ae-4abd...@5g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,

Marcel Overweel <marcel....@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 23 apr, 09:59, Patrick Vervoorn
><patrick.vervo...@NOSPAM.perihelion.demon.nl> wrote:
>> In article <4bd110a5$0$5010$9a6e1...@unlimited.newshosting.com>,
>>
>> Someone <some...@somewhere.com> wrote:
>> >I just ran across this:
>>
>> >http://dropcalc.silospen.com/item.php
>>
>> Interesting. Played around with it a bit, but couldn't seem to get the
>> numbers out for runes...?
>>
>> Did I miss something, or is that not in it?
>
>You have to set the item version on the right to 'misc' and leave the
>rest on default.

Ahh, indeed. Thanks!

Interesting BTW, if this calculator is correct for rings, MF does indeed
matter when you want to get a unique ring (Stone of Jordan to name one
:)).

I know we've had several discussions over the years here whether MF has
any influence on the quality of rings (since rings are by default
magical++), but according to this dropcalc, there are indeed higher
chances of an SOJ from, for instance, NM Andariel with more MF...

Regards,

Patrick.

Marcel Overweel

unread,
Apr 25, 2010, 2:00:32 PM4/25/10
to

"Patrick Vervoorn" <patrick....@NOSPAM.perihelion.demon.nl> schreef in
bericht news:4bd1ce92$0$22937$e4fe...@news.xs4all.nl...

You know what you've done, don't ya?
You've now told that you know in public.
By doing so, Diablo himself sure knows that you know.
Let's just hope he doesn't know that you know now that he knows what
you know...

so you know what to do now. ;)

Cheers!
Marcel (hickup)

0 new messages