A Trump Insider Embeds Climate Denial in Scientific Research

[Rudy Canoza]

At the Interior Department, an official has pressured scientists to include
misleading claims about climate change in their work.

By Hiroko Tabuchi

March 2, 2020
Updated 9:56 a.m. ET

An official at the Interior Department embarked on a campaign that has
inserted misleading language about climate change — including debunked
claims that increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is beneficial — into
the agency’s scientific reports, according to documents reviewed by The New
York Times.

The misleading language appears in at least nine reports, including
environmental studies and impact statements on major watersheds in the
American West that could be used to justify allocating increasingly scarce
water to farmers at the expense of wildlife conservation and fisheries.

The effort was led by Indur M. Goklany, a longtime Interior Department
employee who, in 2017 near the start of the Trump administration, was
promoted to the office of the deputy secretary with responsibility for
reviewing the agency’s climate policies. The Interior Department’s
scientific work is the basis for critical decisions about water and mineral
rights affecting millions of Americans and hundreds of millions of acres of
land.

The wording, known internally as the “Goks uncertainty language” based on
Mr. Goklany’s nickname, inaccurately claims that there is a lack of
consensus among scientists that the earth is warming. In Interior
Department emails to scientists, Mr. Goklany pushed misleading
interpretations of climate science, saying it “may be overestimating the
rate of global warming, for whatever reason;” climate modeling has largely
predicted global warming accurately. The final language states inaccurately
that some studies have found the earth to be warming, while others have not.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/02/climate/goks-uncertainty-language-interior.html

--
If you're not reading the New York Times, you're not following the news.

[Rudy Canoza]

On 3/2/2020 7:49 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> At the Interior Department, an official has pressured scientists to include
> misleading claims about climate change in their work.
>
> By Hiroko Tabuchi
>
>     March 2, 2020
>     Updated 9:56 a.m. ET
>
> An official at the Interior Department embarked on a campaign that has
> inserted misleading language about climate change — including debunked
> claims that increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is beneficial — into
> the agency’s scientific reports, according to documents reviewed by The New
> York Times.
>

> [...]

More:

He also instructed department scientists to add that rising carbon
dioxide — the main force driving global warming — is beneficial because
it “may increase plant water use efficiency” and “lengthen the
agricultural growing season.” Both assertions misrepresent the
scientific consensus that, overall, climate change will result in severe
disruptions to global agriculture and significant reductions in crop
yields.

Samuel Myers, a principal research scientist at Harvard University’s
Center for the Environment who has studied the effects of climate change
on nutrition, said the language “takes very specific and isolated pieces
of science, and tries to expand it in an extraordinarily misleading
fashion.”

[AlleyCat]

On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 07:52:21 -0800, Rudy Canoza says...

> carbon
> dioxide ? the main force driving global warming
>

Another fucking lie.

CO² is .04% of the atmosphere. The DRIVING force is the sun, and there are MANY
forcings that simply "outweigh" CO² in "driving" the climate.

Go back to school, little dick... and try to keep your gay science teacher from
bending you over his desk, this time around.

Poor religious climate fanatics.

They have to lie to make a point.

We don't.

--

A carbon tax will change NOTHING, other than the wealth of politicians and
countries who beg us for money. THAT was the purpose of the Paris Accord...
the ONLY purpose.

Funny... when the government no longer pays for bogus money-grabbing data, the
truth comes out.

It's "weather's not climate" when the temperatures don't agree with what ultra-
religious AGW screechers have to say... but when it does, it's climate change.

"It's all about money in the end. Keeping the Gravy Train running."
https://youtu.be/J9Oi7x2OBdI?t=74

Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers

Climate Change Scientists Caught Tampering With Data to Show Rising Sea Levels

"NOAA And NASA Corrected Historical Temperature Data And Fabricated
Temperature Data"

"NASA Made Efforts To Discredit Their Own Satellite Data"

"NASA Refused To Give Data And Information Requested By The US
House Of Representatives Science, Space And Technology Committee"

"NASA And NOAA Caught In Climate Data Manipulation"

"NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000"

"Spectacularly Poor Climate Science At NASA"

"NASA/NOAA Mislead, Deceive and Lie About 'Hottest Year' Claim - Concede
2014 NOT "Hottest Year"

"Climate Fraud: NASA's Recent Global Warming "Corrections" Equal a +95.0°C
Per Century Trend"

https://www.google.com/#newwindow=1&q=noaa+nasa+caught

**********************************************************

"And we're like... the world is going to end in 12 years if we don't address
climate change..."

AOC's Top Aide Admits Green New Deal About The Economy, Not Climate
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/aocs-top-aide-admits-green-new-deal-
about-the-economy-not-the-climate

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's chief of staff recently admitted that the
Green New Deal was not conceived as an effort to deal with climate change,
but instead a "how-do-you-change-the-entire economy thing" -- a remark
likely to fuel Republican claims that the deal is nothing more than a
thinly veiled socialist takeover of the U.S. economy.

"The interesting thing about the Green New Deal is it wasn't originally a
climate thing at all," Saikat Chakrabarti said in May, according to The
Washington Post.

*****

UN Official Admits That Climate Change Used As A Ruse To Control The
World's Economy
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/diabolical-lie-called-climate-change-used-
un-promote-economic-agenda/

*****

"Unequal Distribution of Wealth and Power" Causes Climate Change
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/11/un-climate-summit-causes-of-
climate-change-unequal-distribution-of-wealth-and-power/

*****

U.N. Official Reveals Real Reason Behind Warming Scare
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/climate-change-scare-tool-to-
destroy-capitalism/

*****

Another Climate Alarmist Admits Real Motive Behind Warming Scare
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/another-climate-alarmist-
admits-real-motive-behind-warming-scare/

*****

United Nations Official Admits the Purpose of the Global Warming Hoax is
to Destroy Capitalism
http://lubbockonline.com/interact/blog-post/donald-r-may/2015-02-
27/united-nations-official-admits-purpose-global-warming#.V-nGUOM1HmE

[AlleyCat]

On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 07:49:35 -0800, Rudy Canoza says...

> including debunked
> claims that increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is beneficial

A lie.

It has been PROVEN that CO² is beneficial in many ways.

[Rudy Canoza]

On 3/2/2020 12:12 PM, AlleyPussyBitch - *NOT* a three-letter athlete,
*NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked
a basketball, and have *NEVER* been laid - lied:

>
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 07:52:21 -0800, Rudy Canoza says...
>
>> carbon
>> dioxide ? the main force driving global warming
>>
>
> Another fucking lie.

Nope.

>
> CO² is .04% of the atmosphere. The DRIVING force is the sun

The amount of sunlight reaching earth fluctuates very little. The "driving
force" behind global warming is *increasing* amounts of greenhouse gases
that, without any doubt, hold in heat that otherwise would escape back into
space.

CO2 was about 0.03% of the atmosphere in 1960. Today it is 0.04%. that's
a *33*% increase in the amount of CO2. In terms of its effect on trapping
heat, that's like increasing the thickness of a down comforter by one third.

Human-caused increases in the amount of CO2, CH4 and other greenhouse gases
are causing rapid global warming. This is not in scientific dispute. It
is only disputed by ignorant, hysterical, impotent little fucks who were
*NOT* three-letter athletes, *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER*
a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and have *NEVER* been laid.

[AlleyCat]

On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 12:30:10 -0800, Rudy Canoza says...

> The misleading language appears...

To be the truth, and these so-called climate "scientists", who are usually NOT
"climate scientists", can't stand it that anyone tells the TRUTH about what is
going on.

When someone tries to take away someone ELSE'S abilities to fool the public, to
make MONEY, they lash out and attack, instead of debating.

> The "driving force" behind global warming is *increasing* amounts of
> greenhouse gases that, without any doubt, hold in heat that otherwise would
> escape back into space.

I say you're wrong... warming comes first. THIS warming began WAY BEFORE we
started driving cars and other forms of CO² output.

https://vimeo.com/223697931

https://vimeo.com/302628150

https://youtu.be/2Lye5liWuZw

https://vimeo.com/262130898

THAT there is more CO², is irrelevant. The warmth is coming first AND since
there IS more CO², the warmth has a little more "staying power", but the CO²
didn't CAUSE the warmth.

In just the last 10,000 years, and as RECENTLY as 100 years, Earth has warmed
up JUST as high and JUST as fast.

This bullshit of blaming man on the warmth, is just anti-capitalist bullshit.

NASA says you're wrong too, by the way .... ANNND the CO² didn't CAUSE the
warmth, what LITTLE we've had. CO² has been released from its sinks at a WAY
higher rate than the temperature has gone up, and if CO² was CAUSING the
warmth, the Earth wouldn't be going through the COLDEST and SNOWIEST winter(s)
in a long time.

"Ohhh... bu bu but the warrrrmmminnnng is causinnng the snooooow", whined the
climate "experts", who happen to be USENET trolls. [giggle]

OK... how about right now? Did the CO² just vanish, because hardly ANYONE is
experiencing a warmer winter, than last?

There's actually been a slow cooling since the 1910s, but NASA and all the
other climate "experts" have been hiding that.

NASA and The NOAA won't show you that, because they NEED their funding.

NASA and every other "climate" entities, has been warming the present and
future and cooling the past.

https://twitter.com/Tony__Heller/status/1234122193568595970

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKhqOHtqKt_YqxwpiaNCaWgfiRmO5wL15

You've been brainwashed, ORRR you're just another one of those basement-
dwelling little nerds who hate those with money, and are just simply, an anti-
capitalist, because YOU don't have any money.

Back to your ORIGINAL assertion that CO² has no benefits:

"... including debunked claims that increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere
is beneficial..."

http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?kh=-1&uddg=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.co2coalition.org%2Fwp-
content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F10%2FCarbon-Dioxide-Benefits-the-World-2.pdf

" Are There Also Benefits to More Carbon Dioxide in the Air? Yes, There Are
Written by Isaac Orr

Carbon dioxide almost always get a bad rap for being a greenhouse gas, but did
you know more CO2 in the atmosphere has caused plants to grow faster, causing
global greening? "

Freeman Dyson Discusses The Benefits Of CO2

https://youtu.be/coEpVJoBHJA?t=42

https://youtu.be/4yrURiXtVYk?t=12

Back to your bullshit about CO² CAUSING warming.

The warming, warming that is EXACTLY like the warming of the past 1000 years,
in different periods, comes FIRST, idiot.

We've had SEVERAL warming periods, when it has warmed up EXACTLY as high and
EXACTLY as fast. We've even had one in the last 100 years, when it was WARMER,
with MANY more days of heatwaves.

I guess your teacher was bending you over his desk when you were SUPPOSED to be
learning about the 1910s through the 1930s, then it cooling off.

http://i.imgur.com/k11PPKy.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/kw7Br18.jpg

Yes, there IS more CO² now, but the warming is causing the CO² to come out of
its' sinks, not the other way around.

YOUR theories, are all observational bullshit. A+B=C

A) CO² cause warming (that's debatable, at best... CO² is more like a
"thermostat" than the heater) [1][2]

CO² doesn't CAUSE the heat... THAT'S the Sun's job, (and the other forcings)...

CO² merely "regulates" and "equalizes" temperatures, planet-wide.

B) Man puts out CO² (LOL... a whole THREE% of the total CO²) [3]

C) It's warmer (lol... a whole .85°C)

[1] CO2: The Thermostat that Controls Earth's Temperature

https://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/lacis_01/

[2] Carbon Dioxide Controls Earth's Temperature
https://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/co2-temperature.html

[3] Percentage-wise, man contributes CO² in the single digits range, of
the total CO², which is now, a whopping .04% of the total of
atmospheric gases. There just isn't enough CO² to cause any
warming on it's own. https://vimeo.com/243588859

> CO2 was about 0.03% of the atmosphere in 1960. Today it is 0.04%. that's
> a *33*% increase in the amount of CO2.
>

And NOT a 33% increase in warming.

0.85°C

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[AlleyCat]

On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 19:28:58 -0800 (PST), Catoni says...

>
> >?CO2 was about 0.03% of the atmosphere in 1960. Today it is 0.04%. that's

> a *33*% increase in the amount of CO2. In terms of its effect on trapping

> heat, that's like increasing the thickness of a down comforter by one third. ?
>
> Ha, ha, ha,.......?...1960...?
>
> Seventy year period out of the last 600 million years during which life exploded into existence on this planet is next to nothing in the history of the world (When CO2?level was 6000ppm - 7000ppm)
> . It?s not even the span of my lifetime.
>
> What do you want? Go back into another Glacial Period.

What *I* want to know, is who told them that 1880 or 1850 or WHATEVER year
they're saying we had the "perfect" climate, was THE optimum climate and
temperature era, for ANYONE or anything.

It wasn't. There are plants and animals now, that didn't exist then, and visa
versa. Extinction IS natural, no matter HOW much bogan-fucking Bret Cahill
makes fun of it. Hit IS natchral, idiot.

It was ALREADY warming up, LONNNNNG before the late 1800s, so I wanna know...
WHO said that the temps and climate then, was the ideal climate?

NO ONE... EVERRRR. Because it wasn't. They just use those years to fool people
into thinking that the industrial revolution and cars and trains and coal-
burning started all of "this", because it was "cooler" before then.

Annnnnnhg... wrong! And to repeat myself, it was ALREADY getting warmer.

They conveeeeeeeniently leave out the fact, that it was ALREADY getting warmer
BEFORE all the CO² release from fossil fuels and coal, just so no one LEARNS
the truth instead of believing their lies.

So, why cling to this bullshit?

Because, it's NOT about temperature OR climate... it's agenda-driven anti-
capitalist bullshit, of in the LEAST, income and money redistribution.

Look no further to what OBAMA did.

Obama Spent $22 BILLION a Year Subsidizing FAILED Green Tech, so he and his
leftist buddies could get rich, while hurting the oil and coal businesses.

They just keep up the facade that they're wanting to "save the planet", when in
reality, the PLANET doesn't need saving... it's US who needs to be saved.

The left is going to drag the whole globe down in a ball of fire... NOT the
climate.

The LEFT is wanting open borders. WHY? To stay in power by giving free shit
away, THAT'S NOT THEIRS, to keep the dregs of society happy.

Same thing with this bullshit of "manmade global warming and climate change".
Their observational and coincidental "science", is bullshit.

A+B doesn't always equal C. NOT when it comes to climate. It's WAY more
complex, than saying, "it's getting warmer, and there's more CO² being put into
the atmosphere."

They don't tell their -85IQ'd idiot winger buddies the WHOLE truth about what
makes the climate change.

They listen to a retard... and BELIEVE her. LOL

> See lots of cities flattened by great ice sheets?

I'm pretty sure no one wants that, but it IS koOky, to want to go back to
another "period" of temps and climate, when natural disasters and weather were
the EXACT same, or WORSE. (see Deccan drought and Famine and all the other
droughts and famines... hurricanes too!)

Ooooh, I'd LOVE it for temps and climate to mirror the late 1800s (it pretty
much IS, but for argument's sake...), and STILL have strong hurricanes and
tornadoes, floods and fires, and the other "disasters" they claim are more
intense and stronger.

Doppler Radar... make your jokes, you pansies, but if we had never developed
Doppler Radar, we'd be having the EXACT number of "tornadoes" as before... more
or less, because MANY were just observed and not "measured".

It would be the same, you know it.... THEY know it. They just pretend we don't
have instrumentation a "million" times more accurate, or that which didn't even
EXIST back then. 0.597346°F LOL

They act like, since we didn't HAVE the instrumentation to have measured
hurricanes and all other types of weather phenomenon, it COULDN'T have been
worse.

Fucking assholes are wrong, and they KNOW it. But they HAVE to keep up the
facade, lest they lose their "war" against the machine (capitalists).

> Want to go back to ?Little Ice Age? conditions? (Circa 1300 - 1850 with a
> few breaks) Climate wise...it was a bad time. You want that ?

These idiots all forget, that PLAGUES plagued us more than now, when it was
COLDER.

> Think it?s too warm pal? Move to the Arctic Islands. Maybe you would love it there?

He KNOWS it's not any warmer than past periods, even just the one from 80 years
ago. NASA and The NOAA are trying (and succeeding in some arenas) to hide or
delete past warming.

Yet Another Round Of Spectacular Data Tampering By NASA And NOAA. Cooling The
Past And Warming The Present -
https://realclimatescience.com/2019/06/tampering-past-the-tipping-point/

https://youtu.be/8tODIRhhV80

> Now tell us why biodiversity lessens as you move from the Tropics to the Polar regions.

STOP! You're gonna make it have to think. They also want the retards on THEIR
side, like Greta, to think that warmth kills, when it's the cold, actually.

Bu bu but, the polarrrrrrr bearrrrrrs. Yes, even when it was the most warm,
they survived and are FLOURISHING today.

https://vimeo.com/246712630

> Your post is hilarious?

So is his height... and you know what they say about short dudes?

Wee wittle wieners.

That's our Rudy.

--

A carbon tax will change NOTHING, other than the wealth of politicians and
countries who beg us for money. THAT was the purpose of the Paris Accord...
the ONLY purpose.

"It's all about money in the end. Keeping the Gravy Train running."
https://youtu.be/J9Oi7x2OBdI?t=74

Funny... when the government no longer pays for bogus money-grabbing data, the
truth comes out.

This is sad... The Usenet Trolls in this group have a new hero... a retard. Get
that testosterone checked, girls!

https://imgur.com/wSbtL1g

https://imgur.com/YoRzkcX

https://imgur.com/7WkuvyE

https://imgur.com/R7fX4Zm

[BeamMeUpScotty]

On 3/2/20 3:30 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> On 3/2/2020 12:12 PM, AlleyPussyBitch - *NOT* a three-letter athlete,
> *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER*
> dunked a basketball, and have *NEVER* been laid - lied:
>>
>> On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 07:52:21 -0800,  Rudy Canoza says...
>>
>>>   carbon
>>>      dioxide ? the main force driving global warming
>>>
>>
>> Another fucking lie.
>
> Nope.
>
>>
>> CO² is .04% of the atmosphere. The DRIVING force is the sun
>
> The amount of sunlight reaching earth fluctuates very little.  The
> "driving force" behind global warming is *increasing* amounts of
> greenhouse gases that, without any doubt, hold in heat that otherwise
> would escape back into space.
>
> CO2 was about 0.03% of the atmosphere in 1960.  Today it is 0.04%. 
> that's a *33*%

And no one died from 33% more CO2, but Democrats stupidity is killing
people by the millions.

--
That's Karma

*Plan for the worst and hope for the best*