Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Like the Nazi's,Facebook censors free spee h

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Y

unread,
Sep 29, 2015, 4:05:56 PM9/29/15
to
Facebookacebook execs and media spokespeople like to claim the company supports free speech. But CEO Mark Zuckerberg let the cat out of the bag in a discussion caught on an open mic with German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

According to reports, Merkel expressed concern over posts critical of the migrants pouring into the country from the Middle East.


CNBC reported:

On the sidelines of a United Nations luncheon on Saturday, Merkel was caught on a hot mic pressing Zuckerberg about social media posts about the wave of Syrian refugees entering Germany, the publication reported.

The Facebook CEO was overheard responding that "we need to do some work" on curtailing anti-immigrant posts about the refugee crisis. "Are you working on this?" Merkel asked in English, to which Zuckerberg replied in the affirmative before the transmission was disrupted.

Now we have it from the horse's mouth, so to speak. For some time, we have documented Facebook's actions stifling posts that moderators don't like, community standards be damned.

Just yesterday, we reported that Georgia parents were livid when a public school was caught indoctrinating children about Islam. Facebook immediately flagged the post, falsely calling it "unsafe." It's not the first time that's happened, as we've reported several times.

Infowars' Mikael Thalen added:

In response to the shocking revelation, media outlets such as Bloomberg immediately leapt to the defense of the tech giant, insinuating that any critique of the German government's response to the migrant crisis would be "racist" and "xenophobic."

Only just last week, an article by Infowars' Kit Daniels examining the pope's controversial comments on mass immigration was pulled and barred from Facebook without explanation.

Exit question: When will lawmakers step in to put an end to this kind of censorship? I'm not holding my breath.

Topaz

unread,
Sep 29, 2015, 4:55:26 PM9/29/15
to


National Socialist Germany was not different from other countries
in regard to free speech laws. Before Hitler was in power he had a lot
of his papers banned. Hitler said:

"You talk about persecution!" (to an address by the Social Democratic
speaker) "I think that there are only a few of us [in our party] here
who did not have to suffer persecutions in prison from your side ...
You seem to have totally forgotten that for years our shirts were
ripped off our backs because you did not like the color . . . In those
days, our newspapers were banned and banned and again banned, our
meetings were forbidden, and we were forbidden to speak, I was
forbidden to speak, for years on. And now you say that criticism is
salutary!"

Even today most countries do not have free speech. In liberal
Germany today people get arrested for doubting the holo story and
other things. People in Britain get arrested for politically incorrect
speech or writing. Saying that the races are not all equal in
intelligence is against the law there.

The United States has the most free speech but even here it has
banned things. At one time the play "Merchant of Venice" was banned in
New York because it offended the Jews. People in America were arrested
for their beliefs during WWII. All countries did that.

But the United States does have the most free speech and this was a
great idea. Hitler also had a great idea of removing the Jews from
controlling the media. If we could combine these two ideas we could
have a winning combination. Allowing free speech is not the same as
allowing one unelected group to virtually control all of the media.
The media is the real power, and a minor post such as President of the
United States is nothing by comparison. Why are we voting for
President and not voting for who will control the media? When it comes
to owning TV stations it is only money that talks, not morality or
virtue.

If one wants to name the group that is most guilty of censoring what
others have to say I would nominate the Jews. But in their Jewish
controlled media they have the gall to point fingers at Hitler.




www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
0 new messages