On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 20:42:21 -0500, Governor Swill
<
governo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 09:02:52 -0700,
koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:
>>On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 03:32:03 -0500, Governor Swill wrote:
>>>On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 18:00:37 -0500, Vandar wrote:
>>>>They all do it. I'm not complaining about it though. There's no point to
>>>>complaining, especially here.
>>>>I don't have a problem with corporate donations. DC enacts legislation
>>>>that affects corporations, so they should be able to influence who goes
>>>>to DC.
>>>The only problem I have with campaign finance is it's too complicated.
>>>Anybody ought to be able to donate as much as they'd like to any
>>>candidate or party they want as long as it's done publicly - no more
>>>anonymous contributions.
>
>>SO---you advocate the rich having more power?
>
>My opinion is based on Citizens United which SCOTUS decision I don't
>agree with. Tough shit, it's the law of the land now. So, while I
>don't agree that money is free speech or that contributions can be
>anonymous, between the two, I disagree more with the anonymity than
>with the limitless spending.