Jay Leno
Joe Snodgrass
There's two reasons why I didn't watch the royal wedding.
They're called TESTICLES!!!
Sally
> There's two reasons why I didn't watch the royal wedding.
>
> They're called TESTICLES!!!
Some punchlines are created out of desperation. If Leno thought this
was the best line he could come up with about the royal wedding,
then....he's offering his own body for laughs.
Sally
Vocalize
On 5/3/11 6:18 AM, in article
13fdc53e-03e9-46d2...@z13g2000yqg.googlegroups.com, "Joe
Snodgrass" <joe....@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> There's two reasons why I didn't watch the royal wedding.
>
> They're called TESTICLES!!!
Ripped off from an earlier Letterman joke about the second "Sex In The City"
movie.
Dano
news:f86e963d-8881-480a...@d27g2000vbz.googlegroups.com...
======================================
That was a Leno joke? Really? I knew he had fallen...but wow. He has
become unwatchable.
Joe Snodgrass
Are you trying to take away my testicles?
lpfeffa
>
> There's two reasons why I didn't watch the royal wedding.
>
> They're called TESTICLES!!!
Leno's got balls? Who knew?
R H Draney
>
>In article <ippc08$uqr$1...@dont-email.me>, "Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>That was a Leno joke? Really? I knew he had fallen...but wow. He has
>>become unwatchable.
>
>haven't watched since the Conan O'Brien debacle.
>
>If they put him out to pasture like CNN/Larry King I hope he's not replaced
>by some insufferable Brit like Russell Brand.
How would you feel if it were some insufferable Brit like Ricky Gervais,
then?...r
--
Me? Sarcastic?
Yeah, right.
Dano
"Joe Snodgrass" wrote in message
news:a0a92fec-1341-40cb...@d19g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
=======================================
Not to worry. No one is interested in your testicles.
Remysun
I tried Rocky Mountain Oysters for the first time last night. Wait a
minute. There are no oysters in the mountains. Oh shit.
Joe Snodgrass
...whoosh...
Wiseguy
6f260a...@d27g2000vbz.googlegroups.com:
You're the one who's desperate trying to find a reason to denigrate Leno.
Is that the best you can do?
Wiseguy
Fallen? How? Does he feel the need to attack the competition almost
nightly? Does he feel the need to endlessly repeat punchlines? If he's so
unwatchable how come someone here always knows what he does and says?
Wiseguy
news:dennism3-ya0240800...@news.datemas.de:
> In article <ippc08$uqr$1...@dont-email.me>, "Dano"
> <janea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>That was a Leno joke? Really? I knew he had fallen...but wow. He
>>has become unwatchable.
>
> Does he still do the obligatory Bill Clinton sex joke every night? I
> haven't watched since the Conan O'Brien debacle.
>
> If they put him out to pasture like CNN/Larry King I hope he's not
> replaced by some insufferable Brit like Russell Brand.
You're confused. It's Dave who repeats jokes every night.
Dano
news:Xns9EDBEE65F286...@69.16.185.252...
===========================================
There's this thing called the Internet you see....
Dano
news:Xns9EDBEE7FAD0C...@69.16.185.252...
======================================
They both do...actually they ALL do. There are a finite number of "jokes"
in the universe.
Theft of jokes and gags is the most time honored tradition in show biz.
Dano
news:Xns9EDBEDB28317...@69.16.185.252...
================================================
<gasp>
Not THAT! Who dareth denigrate the great Leno? Gads! For shame.
I think he will console himself with his hundreds of millions and his 37
cars and motorcycles.
Jess Band-EE-Coot
That's a bit of a reach, isn't it?
If two talk shows come up with the same joke by chance, that would be a
coincidence.
Stealing material is not "honored".
Knowingly repeating material night after night is lazy.
--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Girls who put out are tramps. Girls who don't are ladies.
This is, however, a rather archaic usage of the word.
Should one of you boys happen upon a girl who doesn't put out,
do not jump to the conclusion that you have found a lady.
What you have probably found is a lesbian.”
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Jess Band-EE-Coot
That's a bit of a reach, isn't it?
Dano
news:4dc2cde9$0$12222$607e...@cv.net...
On 5/5/2011 11:26 AM, Dano wrote:
> "Wiseguy" wrote in message
> news:Xns9EDBEE7FAD0C...@69.16.185.252...
>
> denn...@dennism3.invalid (Dennis M) wrote in
> news:dennism3-ya0240800...@news.datemas.de:
>
>> In article <ippc08$uqr$1...@dont-email.me>, "Dano"
>> <janea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> That was a Leno joke? Really? I knew he had fallen...but wow. He
>>> has become unwatchable.
>>
>> Does he still do the obligatory Bill Clinton sex joke every night? I
>> haven't watched since the Conan O'Brien debacle.
>>
>> If they put him out to pasture like CNN/Larry King I hope he's not
>> replaced by some insufferable Brit like Russell Brand.
>
> You're confused. It's Dave who repeats jokes every night.
>
> ======================================
>
> They both do...actually they ALL do. There are a finite number of
> "jokes" in the universe.
>
> Theft of jokes and gags is the most time honored tradition in show biz.
>
That's a bit of a reach, isn't it?
If two talk shows come up with the same joke by chance, that would be a
coincidence.
Stealing material is not "honored".
Knowingly repeating material night after night is lazy.
==============================
So I guess you repeating that by double posting was lazy too?
Let me just suggest that if you are monitoring all these shows...you have
just a bit too much time on your hands friend. As for "repeating" the same
material...when you do topical humor...a lot of folks will come up with the
same or at least similar "jokes" on any given topic. This ain't brain
surgery...and if it were...the same techniques are "copied" all the time
too.
It's simply NOT that frigging important.
lpfeffa
>
> Stealing material is not "honored".
Tell that to Milton Berle
Twibil
>
>
> > Stealing material is not "honored".
>
> Tell that to Milton Berle
Which bolgia do you suppose we should search first?
Jess Band-EE-Coot
> "Jess Band-EE-Coot" wrote in message
> That's a bit of a reach, isn't it?
> If two talk shows come up with the same joke by chance, that would be a
> coincidence.
> Stealing material is not "honored".
> Knowingly repeating material night after night is lazy.
>
> ==============================
>
> So I guess you repeating that by double posting was lazy too?
>
> Let me just suggest that if you are monitoring all these shows...you
> have just a bit too much time on your hands friend. As for "repeating"
> the same material...when you do topical humor...a lot of folks will come
> up with the same or at least similar "jokes" on any given topic. This
> ain't brain surgery...and if it were...the same techniques are "copied"
> all the time too.
>
> It's simply NOT that frigging important.
Why do certain people just make up their own shit??
At what point did I say that I "monitor all these shows"?
Where would you ever draw that conclusion from what I wrote?
As for the double posting, it's the server.
Deal.
Dano
On 5/5/2011 12:28 PM, Dano wrote:
> "Jess Band-EE-Coot" wrote in message
> That's a bit of a reach, isn't it?
> If two talk shows come up with the same joke by chance, that would be a
> coincidence.
> Stealing material is not "honored".
> Knowingly repeating material night after night is lazy.
>
> ==============================
>
> So I guess you repeating that by double posting was lazy too?
>
> Let me just suggest that if you are monitoring all these shows...you
> have just a bit too much time on your hands friend. As for "repeating"
> the same material...when you do topical humor...a lot of folks will come
> up with the same or at least similar "jokes" on any given topic. This
> ain't brain surgery...and if it were...the same techniques are "copied"
> all the time too.
>
> It's simply NOT that frigging important.
Why do certain people just make up their own shit??
At what point did I say that I "monitor all these shows"?
Where would you ever draw that conclusion from what I wrote?
As for the double posting, it's the server.
Deal.
==================================
Nah...I'll just simply learn from this and ignore all future postings by
you. Not worth the time and effort.
Jess Band-EE-Coot
How will I ever get over this??
....and done.
Sally
> Sally <SallyDr...@aol.com> wrote in news:f86e963d-8881-480a-9f70-
> 6f260a1f6...@d27g2000vbz.googlegroups.com:
>
> > On May 3, 9:18 am, Joe Snodgrass <joe.s...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> There's two reasons why I didn't watch the royal wedding.
>
> >> They're called TESTICLES!!!
>
> > Some punchlines are created out of desperation. If Leno thought this
> > was the best line he could come up with about the royal wedding,
> > then....he's offering his own body for laughs.
>
> > Sally
>
> You're the one who's desperate trying to find a reason to denigrate Leno.
> Is that the best you can do?
When it comes to Jay Leno, desperation is one emotion I wouldn't put
on my list. But I am interested, in a kind of analytical way, in the
construction of a joke. And I really don't want to have to think of
the tentacles of any particular comic. It just doesn't make me laugh.
Craig Ferguson, of course, if so completely over-the-top sexually in
the comedy sense, that he uses words I have never heard of before to
describe the gentles. He's obsessed. And funny. And pointy.
I don't know if "balls" would've been funnier in Jay's case, (it's a
bit more blatant,) but in any case, let's keep the jokes above the
belt unless it's an unusually witty use of the word testicles/
tentacles. As Mel Brooks once said, "You have to be gentle with the
genitals." And I am NOT after anyones tentacles. I'm not Octopussy. :)
I'm just a kid listening for a good joke about the royal wedding. Make
fun of Wills' uniform or bald spot. Maybe make fun of the Queen's lack
of expression. But leave your balls out of it. This wasn't the World
Series.
This message will self-destruct in due time. Good luck, Mr. Bond.
Sally
Mason Barge
<joe....@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>There's two reasons why I didn't watch the royal wedding.
>
>They're called TESTICLES!!!
There are two reasons I don't watch Leno.
They're called BRAINS.
johnny bobby bee
> There are two reasons I don't watch Leno.
>
> They're called BRAINS.
You've got 2 brains? Damn, you must top over all the time. Be careful
going 'round corners.
--
What you don't know can hurt you, only you won't know it.
Dano
news:7bq8s652io9dldr66...@4ax.com...
They're called BRAINS.
=========================
Hmmmm...the man with two brains eh? Fascinating.
Steve Curtis
>Mason Barge wrote:
>>There are two reasons I don't watch
>>Leno.
>>They're called BRAINS.
>You've got 2 brains? Damn, you must
>top over all the time. Be careful going
>'round corners.
Not to mention having a debate between the two of them.
lpfeffa
I loved that movie.