Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: moon photos cant have been taken on the moon
2 views
Skip to first unread message
kingofthepaupers
Jun 21, 2009, 12:13:42 PM6/21/09
to
On Jun 18, 12:01 pm, Turd Ferguson <turd.fergu...@snl.info> wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:22:36 +1000, "Seon Ferguson" <seo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >"Turd Ferguson" <turd.fergu...@snl.info> wrote in message
> >news:5pij35he1gkvcfa68...@4ax.com...
> No, Uranus
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:22:36 +1000, "Seon Ferguson" <seo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >"Turd Ferguson" <turd.fergu...@snl.info> wrote in message
> >news:5pij35he1gkvcfa68...@4ax.com...
> No, Uranus
Jct: Isn't it fascinating how a serious article on photography gets
jumped on
by a bunch of ass-holes switching the topic to who's the biggest
Uranus.
The article must have uncovered quite a sensitive lie in the official
story to
incur such a reaction. To you who have upped my interest in the "phony
fotos"
issue, I can only say you'd have done better keeping your smelly
opinions
where you got them: Uranus.
Tim Miller
Jun 21, 2009, 12:17:41 PM6/21/09
to
kingofthepaupers wrote:
> On Jun 18, 12:01 pm, Turd Ferguson <turd.fergu...@snl.info> wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:22:36 +1000, "Seon Ferguson" <seo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "Turd Ferguson" <turd.fergu...@snl.info> wrote in message
>>> news:5pij35he1gkvcfa68...@4ax.com...
>> No, Uranus
>
> Jct: Isn't it fascinating how a serious article on photography gets
> jumped on
> by a bunch of ass-holes switching the topic to who's the biggest
> Uranus.
> On Jun 18, 12:01 pm, Turd Ferguson <turd.fergu...@snl.info> wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:22:36 +1000, "Seon Ferguson" <seo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "Turd Ferguson" <turd.fergu...@snl.info> wrote in message
>>> news:5pij35he1gkvcfa68...@4ax.com...
>> No, Uranus
>
> Jct: Isn't it fascinating how a serious article on photography gets
> jumped on
> by a bunch of ass-holes switching the topic to who's the biggest
> Uranus.
No argument there. It's that ignorant, crossposting loser
Turmel.
quintal
Jun 21, 2009, 3:47:36 PM6/21/09
to
In article <1e88d853-347e-400d-94a2-
24bd39...@l34g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>, johnt...@yahoo.com says...
> On Jun 18, 12:01 pm, Turd Ferguson <turd.fergu...@snl.info> wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:22:36 +1000, "Seon Ferguson" <seo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >"Turd Ferguson" <turd.fergu...@snl.info> wrote in message
> > >news:5pij35he1gkvcfa68...@4ax.com...
> > No, Uranus
>
> Jct: Isn't it fascinating how a serious article on photography gets
> jumped on
> by a bunch of ass-holes switching the topic to who's the biggest
> Uranus.
> The article must have uncovered quite a sensitive lie in the official
> story to
> incur such a reaction.
24bd39...@l34g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>, johnt...@yahoo.com says...
> On Jun 18, 12:01 pm, Turd Ferguson <turd.fergu...@snl.info> wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:22:36 +1000, "Seon Ferguson" <seo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >"Turd Ferguson" <turd.fergu...@snl.info> wrote in message
> > >news:5pij35he1gkvcfa68...@4ax.com...
> > No, Uranus
>
> Jct: Isn't it fascinating how a serious article on photography gets
> jumped on
> by a bunch of ass-holes switching the topic to who's the biggest
> Uranus.
> The article must have uncovered quite a sensitive lie in the official
> story to
> incur such a reaction.
i dont know, i dont think they even need to have alook at it to have that
knee jerk reaction
yes the page is outstanding
> To you who have upped my interest in the "phony
> fotos"
> issue, I can only say you'd have done better keeping your smelly
> opinions
> where you got them: Uranus.
haha
0 new messages