Report - RAPE, BURNING OF HOMESTEAD AT PAKUNDIA, BANGLADESH
Dr. Jai Maharaj
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate
Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust
Forwarded message from "G.Subramaniam" <gsu...@comcast.net>
Fw - HRCBM's Investigative Report:
Rape, burning of homestead alleged at
Pakundia, Bangladesh
[ Subject: HRCBM's Investigative Report: Rape,
[ burning of homestead alleged at Pakundia, Bangladesh
[ From: "save bangla" <saveban...@yahoo.com>
[ Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2004
Rape, burning of homestead, forceful
land occupation and conversion to
Islam alleged at Barshagati,
Pakundia, Bangladesh An
Investigative report of HRCBM- Dhaka
conducted at Barshagati village,
Pakundia P.s. Dist. Kishroeganj,
Bangladesh.
She was kidnaped and help captive by
her vanguisher, latter try to sell
her. She escaped yet got again gang
raped by criminals. At last HRCBM
comes to rescue, read the
investigative report with pictures.
Read the report at If you are unable
to view, please visit
http://www.hrcbm.com/NEWLOOK/pakundia_atrocity_02_04.html
for html version of the report, and
http://www.hrcbm.com/NEWLOOK/pakundia_atrocity_02_04.pdf
to download adobe pdf version of the report.
thanks
Dr. A. Halder
HRCBM
http://www.hrcbm.org
End of forwarded message from "G.Subramaniam" <gsu...@comcast.net>
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
Sahar
Please note, Islam did not do this to her, rather some warped
individuals who claim to be Muslims, thats a big difference. There are
criminals everywhere who might say they are "muslims, Hindu, Christian
or Jew"
But you cannot blame the religions for their crminality. I wish the
victim and her family well.
Regardss
Sahar, UK
Kshatriya
Well then there must be a LOT of muslim individuals like this in
Bangladesh , because since 1970 , Hindus have constantly been
persecuted, killed and forced to flee just because they are
non-muslims or Kaffirs.
In fact Koran instructs muslims to kill Kafirs and make them pay Jazia
tax for being unbelievers and that is exactly what has been taking
place in Bangladesh.
Read the truth below :-
Genocide and Crime Against Humanity in Bangladesh
Part 1
By Abinash Baghchi
Peace and harmony in the whole world are being kept hostage due to
two relatively insignificant problems (popular comparison melon with
peanut) in the present time, in terms of number of peoples involved
and murdered. However, in the backdoor of these two minor problems,
huge humanitarian catastrophes are being silently watched all over the
world. Some of these issues are taken up in terms of past, present and
future implications to the whole humanity, in this essay. This piece
is mainly concentrated on Indian-subcontinent in general, and
Bangladesh in particular, because of the serious conspiracy on the
non-Muslim community in that country (see recent postings
http://www.bangladesh-web.com/news). International perspective is also
touched whenever deemed necessary. The essay is divided into several
sub-sections although related to each other for the convenience of the
readers to pick up the topic of their liking since the piece a bit
long. The author has no intention to hurt the feelings of any
individual, ethnic or religious groups but issues are discussed as it
is seen by an individual. Similarly, advance apology from the author
to the English speaking peoples because of the poor linguistic
quality.
Numbers game in Bangladesh
So shameful
Be careful folks in the West
Connection of ethnical cleansing in Bangladesh and in Kashmir
Mindset of Bangladeshi Muslims
Butchers are still around
Moral and intellectual crisis of the Muslims
How they do it in Bangladesh
1. Numbers game in Bangladesh
The readers are referred to the following two websites which are
relevant, the first site is maintained by the USA
(http://www.odci.gov/cia/publications/factbook) where the exact
population in July 2002 in Bangladesh was shown to be 133,376,684 and
religious distributions were: Muslim 83 %, Hindu 16 %, Other 1%
(1998%). Quite a large number of Hindu populations, aren't they ? I am
not sure if any country or even UN has such comprehensive data about
this world, and I never had any doubt or question about their
authenticity. The other site:
(http://www.hindunet.org/hindu_history/modern/hindu_bangla.html),
provides statistics on the number of Hindus massacred in the then
East Pakistan in 1971, to be exact 2.47 millions. This figure is
calculated based on many international investigations, is close to
three million as claimed by many peoples including the post
independent Government in Bangladesh. Why then this game to downplay
the numbers of Hindus in Bangladesh (both inhabitants and those killed
in 1971)? The answer is rather simple and may become more clear in the
following discussion.
The Nazi's (read similarity between Nazism and Islamic philosophy) are
trying to downplay WWII holocaust during the last 60 years, with
little success. Why any Government (past and present) in Bangladesh is
reluctant to list the massacred peoples in Bangladesh including those
who were killed in direct confrontation with Pakistanis
(muktibahinis=freedom fighters)? Since 1972, all Governments in
Bangladesh are making and remaking a real list (?) of the
muktibahinis, God knows that they will never do it. Although it would
not be very difficult because there are people who were fighting
directly still alive (Banga Bir Mr. Bagha Kader Siddiqi MP can give an
account how many of his comrades lost lives in fighting), or in the
archives with Indian military. All civilians who were killed/murdered
can be traced in every village or in towns, witnesses are still alive
in Bangladesh, India and in Pakistan. Numbers game is a common
strategy among the Muslims; either to downplay or the reverse as
deemed necessary.
2. So shameeful
The problem of the majority of Muslims in Bangladesh is that, it is so
shameful and unbearable that the majority of the lost lives were
Hindus, and the fruits are mainly being enjoyed by a small group of
Muslims, carefully using Islam for this purpose. What a shame to let
other peoples know, particularly the Ummah (because most of them
mainly associate with the Ummah, the rest of the Muslims in this
world). Thousands of Indian soldiers sacrificed also their lives to
liberate a nation from the devils, and how can the Ummah accept this
that the country was liberated by the pool of blood of so many
infidels ? Such denials of the pool of bloods of so many souls for the
liberation of a country is unparallel in the history of mankind,
probably it is mandatory to do so in the name of Islam.
3. Be careful folks in the West
Some weeks ago the military operation in the name of controlling
terrorists started in Bangladesh. As the result many of the known
terrorists have landed in the West. This happens now and then
irrespective of the group in power in Bangladesh. Hundreds of
thousands of Bangladeshi Muslims have migrated by using various ways
to the West since the liberation of that country (the blood of about 3
million innocent people made this possible). Thousands of them can be
categorized not only as terrorists but also as severe violator of
Human Rights, back at their home according to the Western standard.
Thousands of the Pakistanis who perpetrated genocide in East Pakistan
are also said to be living in the West. These are sleeping terrorist
cells and are ready to bite as soon as the time is ripe, as was done
recently in the USA by the 19 Arabs.
These peoples can be easily traced from their past activities in their
homeland (this was done in recent time in the case of former
Yugoslovia and Rwanda in the Western countries), as well as from their
activities in the present lands of shelter. Some of the murderers of
Sk Mujib (discussed later) are still roaming in the West. To remind
you that the West has selective definition of terrorism and murderer
so as the muslims (none of them accept terrorism as Universal evil in
reality). You may easily find some recent examples. Generally in
connivance with those in power these terrorists slip into other
countries, strange however, that they can provide in details
whereabout the criminals and then claim that it was the fault of the
host country.
4. Connection of ethnical cleansing in Bangladesh and in Kashmir
In the beginning of the last century (1904) Nawab Salimullah, a
settler from Kashmir in Dacca, the then eastern part of Bengal,
declared that Eastern part of Bengal (the then East Pakistan and
present Bangladesh) including Assam have to be separated from the rest
of Bengal and India because the majority of the people were Muslims.
Salimullah did not speak Bengali, neither those who were surrounding
him did. Still today the remnants speak a strange language at home and
in the streets of Dhaka, unfamiliar to most of the Bengalis.
Some Bangali readers may remember discussions on controversy over
Tagores anti Bengaldesh stance (although the concept of Bangladesh was
not there) now and then in websites related to Bangladesh. These
peoples simply consider the breaking of Bengal into religious lines
the starting point of the concept, "Two Nation Theory", that means, a
Muslim can not live in the same country where infidel human beings
live (most of the Muslim countries are ethnically cleansed or almost
cleansed because of this principle). Surprisingly, most of these
writings are coming from the Bengali Muslims living in the infidel
countries.
I will try to elaborate a bit on the Kashmir connection of the
genocide of Hindus in the East Pakistan later. The process is still
going on in Bangladesh albeit with less intensity. Sometimes different
approaches are taken based on the teachings of the Holy Book to adjust
of the prevailing situation around the world. Recent comments by
Taslima Nasrin is worthy to mention
(http://atimes.com/ind-pak/DF06Df01.html). In that comment on Gujrat
violence she called Gujrat violence as communal riots and the one
happening in Bangladesh as genocide.
5. Mindset of Bangladeshi muslims
To mention here, the comment in reply to a question in new York by
Mrs. Hasina (immediate past Prime minister and present opposition and
leader and leader of the largest political party in Bangladesh), who
advised the hindus to be loyal citizens of Bangladesh and not to keep
feet on two boats (http://www.mayerdak.com/dec1999c1.htm).
Similar advice was used to given by the late president Mr. Ziaur
Rahman during his meeting with minority people (as his close
associates do witness). He even went to the extent that the Hindus
should forget India instead they should build Gaya, Kashi etc. (Hindu
religious places) in Bangladesh. On the contrary, hundreds of Muslims
travel to India by special train from Bangladesh to attend urs at
different majars (shrines), not to mention about Mecca to perform haj
with Government subsidy, although it is forbidden in Koran (to take
help from others to perform haj), what a contradiction! Since
Calcutta was the capital of Bengal and even for whole India for
sometimes during the British rule, and industrially and educationally,
developed in the then India, thousands of peoples not only from Bengal
but also from other parts of India were divided already before the
partition. The way you can also find today in Dhaka or in any capital
or big city around the world.
The number of divided families increased to millions after the
partition, mostly Hindu families, but thousands of Muslim families are
also still divided. The advices of Mrs. Hasina or the late Ziaur
Rahman were not surprising because Muslims think that only they have
the rights in both ways.
Hundreds of thousands of Bengali Muslims are living nowadays abroad
and they can have dual citizenships, no body will ask you questions.
But if you are a Hindu then you are accused of having lost all your
loyalty as soon as you cross the border to India, either for religious
obligations (all of Hindu religious places are located in different
parts of India) or to meet your relatives. That is a general rule
practised by most of the Bengali Muslims irrespective of political
affiliation (see some recent postings in Bangladesh related websites
even from those living in the West).
Please see the Kashmir connection and similarity (more follows) in
ethnic cleansing. Most of the non-Muslims in the Pakistan occupied
Kashmir were murdered during occupation by Pakistan 1948, a few could
escape to India. In the Indian part of Kashmir, all non-Muslims in the
valley have been driven out of their homes, and thousands were killed
by the Muslim terrorists including destruction of their homes and
religious places (this happened quite recently even under Indian rule
and it is still going on). At the same time hundreds of thousands of
Kashmiri Muslims have settled in other parts of the world and in other
states of India (some of these Kashmiris presumably are considered as
guilty for their crime back home against non-Muslims). This principle
of ownership of both ways is common to all Muslims including
Bangladeshis, Pakistanis, Kashmiris, and Arabs.
6. Butchers are still around
The present Pakistani military president, visited Bangladesh sometimes
ago, after the present regime in Bangladesh came to power. Few months
prior to his visit, one of the devils of the modern time (in disguise
of human being) known as the butcher of Dacca, General Tikka Khan
(worthy to research relationship between Chengiz Khan, the great
butcher) was buried with state honour in that country. Many of his
Bengali Muslim brothers were begging him just to regret and then
forget the genocide in Bangladesh.
But the problem is, massacre of infidels is considered as part of holy
jihad and a true Muslim cannot accept otherwise. Turkey is guilty of
the massacre of the Armenians a century ago and is still reluctant to
accept that, based on the same principle, I suppose.
(http://www.davidicke.net/tellthetruth/history/genocine.html) .
7. Moral and intellectual crisis of the Muslims
Few weeks ago Mrs. Hasina came back from her visit to USA and Europe.
A barrage of questions of the identity of her daughter in law were
asked by the journalists if she was Indian or not, during a news
conference in Dhaka (can be read in BD related websites). The reply of
Mrs. Hasina was a burning example how seriously Bangladesh as a nation
in particular, and the Muslims in general, are suffering from severe
moral and intellectual crisis.
To note that, India houses more muslins than live in Bangladesh, even
thousands of Bangladeshi Muslims are divided between India and
Bangladesh. Some of the Indian Muslims are among the richest and great
personalities of the present world. India provided shelter including
to Mrs. Hasina and her children; in addition of many political leaders
and freedom fighters from Bangladesh, not to mention more than 12
million refugees during liberation war in 1971. Mrs. Hasina simply did
not had the moral strength to reply the questions by asking what would
be wrong if her son was married to an Indian Muslim girl, probably
because the Ummah would be very displeased.
Some months after the Gujrat crisis in India, a large number of
Bangladeshi professors in the West (I assume they are educated in the
West, and I have no doubt that these personalities have reached the
highest academic position by virtue of their outstanding contribution
in their respective area of speciality), but just read their reaction.
"We also strongly advocate that the acts in Gujarat must not be seen
by the Muslim community as an open invitation to commit similar
criminal and inhuman acts against "any" minority population that might
exist in their Muslim majority states",
(http://www.bangladesh-web.com/news/may/13/g13052002.htm#A9 ). If you
read the whole statement you never see any utterance what caused that
tragedy in Gujrat. Moreover, if you read carefully there is a veil
threat to the Bangladeshi minorities living thousands of miles away
from Gujrat.
Muslims never criticise Muslims, no matter what crime they may commit.
Examples of such happenings are plenty. A strange brotherhood indeed!
One of the most recent terrifying examples was the gassing of
thousands of Kurds (100 % Sunni Muslims) in the town Halabja by the
Iraki regime. The Iraki regime can only be compared with the regimes
in Pakistan in terms of number of killings, destruction of properties
and displacement of millions of human beings from their home (within
the respective countries and to their surrounding neighbours). Example
are former East Pakistan, Afghanistan and Kashmir in case of Pakistan,
war with Iran and Kuwait in case of Iraq, somebody may help with real
statistics.
No Islamic countries or organisations or intellectuals or the
anarchists in other countries raised their voice against the crimes to
the humanity perpetrated by these regimes. Even the UN was looking
silently when the former President of Afghanistan was snatched away
from the UN custody in Kabul and was brutally murdered by the
Pakistanis in the disguise of Taliban.
Here is another terrifying example; in April 2002, eight months after
the attacks of Sept. 11, a Saudi cleric named Sheik Saad al-Buraik,
preaching in a mosque in the Saudi capital of Riyadh, called for the
enslavement of Jewish women by Muslim men. "Do not have mercy or
compassion toward the Jews". "Their women are yours to take,
legitimately. God made them yours." This high-ranking Saudi priest was
a member of the official Saudi delegation that accompanied Crown
Prince Abdullah during his visit to President Bush in his ranch in
Texas, at the end of April 2002. This was mentioned by Mr. Richard
Bernstein while commenting on the book "The House of Saud From
Tradition to Terror" (nytimes.com/2002/11/08/books/).
The same principle is adopted in Bangladesh when they terrorise and
violate Hindu women folk. You never have heard if any perpetrators of
such crimes against Hindu women that has ever been punished in
Bangladesh.
Another very recent even more terrifying example, the honour they paid
to the killer of CIA agents in USA (who could be compared with any
mass murderer) shown in Quetta (Pakistan) where thousands of people
received the dead body of the murderer, Pakistan's newly elected
national assembly started the function after paying homage to this
departed soul, thousands of peoples were gathered to attended the
ceremony including Government Officials and leaders of all political
parties. Unbelievable, isn't it? Can a state decorate a terrorist who
was convicted for murdering cold bloodedly several civilians as a
martyr? Yes, such bizarre things can happen only in countries that are
governed according to Islamic rule.
It seems, almost all political leaders/rulers in all Muslim majority
countries and a large number the Muslim intellectual communities
including their priests, are simply passing through very serious moral
and intellectual crisis. If this is a sign of total chaos and anarchy
in the Muslim countries is to be seen in the future.
8. How they do it in Bangladesh
It would be unbelievable to any Westerner who has not been studying
closely the Muslims. I mean literally closely (being surrounded by
them and understanding their language, culture and religious rituals).
I will briefly mention a small fraction, how ethnic cleansing is
conducted in Bangladesh, based on the principles written in Koran and
Hadis. After 1971, the policy of implementation was changed from open
genocide to subtle/low intensity genocide/ethnic cleansing. First
priority was to create a security apparatus devoid of minorities,
which had additional objective to capture the Eastern part of India
including West Bengal (with helping hands from those countries are
mentioned before).
Many people would jump to cite example of the Rakhhi Bahini (a special
security apparatus was built after creation of Bangladesh), but in
reality very few Hindus were inducted, somebody may help with the
statistics (real statistics, because lying about non-Muslims is one of
the main pillars of the belief). I have heard myself conversation by
the Rakhhi Bahini leaders mentioning Hindus as "malauns", a popular
abusing word meant Hindus in Bangladesh, which is used almost by all
Muslims, irrespective of education or political affiliation.
If any Hindu attends any interview to be recruited in the security
apparatus, first question they will ask the Hindu aspirant is: if he
would eat beef, just to scare them away (Hindus do not eat beef as the
Muslims or Jews do not eat pork for different reasons). The
administrative and judiciary apparatus is almost devoid of Hindus (see
above for % of Hindu population in BD).
You will be amazed if you get the chance to talk to any BD military
openly. They will give you rather good estimate when (in terms of
year and months) they are going to hoist the BD flag in the Fort
Williams in Calcutta, more or less the same way a Pakistani military
will give you an estimate even more accurately (in terms of week and
day), when they are going to hoist their flag on the top of Lal Kella
in Delhi. As unbelievable as it may sound, I have heard it by my own
ears the slogans were shouted in the streets of Dhaka by the
militaries during the day of the so called revolution day in BD.
There is nothing wrong to educate ones security apparatus by showing a
visible enemy, however, the problem is that they consider the entire
Hindu population in BD as Indian agents (see some recent postings in
NFB), which they consider as their natural enemy because the majority
of the population in India is Hindu.
Very often inhuman methods are applied to conduct systematic ethnic
cleansing; different approaches are taken for this purpose. Occupation
of their properties in the pretext of various laws to force the Hindus
to sell their properties at a very cheap price which in turn also
forces them to flee the land. Hindu business communities and other
professionals are the groups subjected to continuous pressure mainly
by the whole Government machinery (you may find some extraordinary
exceptions).
Quite often Hindu young girls, even minors are kidnapped and
forcefully converted and married to Muslims in connivance with
security, administrative and judicial machineries. To violet and
dishonour Hindu women is also a part of the strategy, as instructed in
the Quran (considered as an additional key to the heaven although that
is already exclusively granted to the Muslims). Continuous pressure to
the Hindu community by dishonouring their women folk is part of the
whole strategy (http://www.janakantha.com October 12, 2002).
One never hears any justice is brought upon those who rape the Hindu
women in Bangladesh (many such crimes go unreported because of social
implications and instead they prefer to migrate to India). Since the
security and administrative apparatus are almost completely devoid of
Hindus, these peoples enjoy all opportunity to terrorise the Hindu
civilians, by abusing, harassing, raiding their homes, severe torture
without any reason, sometimes even selective murder. These are done to
generate terror in the hearts of Hindus, to force them to leave their
homes, more or less the way the prophet used to do to the infidels
(even during the present military operation several Hindus were
murdered in the city of Dhaka, quite unusual in terms of number and
timing).
This ritual of harassing of non-Muslims is considered to be the silver
key to the doors in the heaven to Muslims. Raiding the caravans (buses
or at the borders) of the Hindu visitors to India is quite common even
when peoples possess valid documents. They simply would tell you that
your documents are false, and there is no ways for the poor people to
prove otherwise. Only way to escape is to give them their valuables
they possess. News of such happening you may read now and then, even
it happens in the heart of the capital of Bangladesh.
The sufferings may not end there in Bangladesh, their last possessions
can be taken away even in the Indian side by threatening these
helpless and defenceless civilians of all ages to be sent back to
Bangladesh. Very often entire families are sent to jails in India
(violating International laws. India had even the legal responsibility
to evacuate non-Muslims from Pakistan according to the statute of
partition /independence in 1947), and continues the endless agony of
these human beings.
During the first military rule in BD, in villages, Hindu men used to
be picked up selectively (not in massive scale, however) and beaten
severely by the militaries to terrorise the entire Hindu population.
Many of these terrorised peoples left the country as soon as they
could.
Where did these Hindus that were displaced from Bangladesh end up? You
find them in the streets, in the slums in big cities, in addition to
West Bengal and other surrounding states in India, doing all sorts of
menial work to survive. Thousands of them had been forcefully shipped
to Andaman Islands and in the jungles of distant states in India
during the post partition era. This caused permanent separation from
their natural environment and close relatives to millions of Bengali
Hindus after the partition.
A very large number of human beings have been subjected to continuous
atrocities and crimes are being perpetrated against them during the
last 55 years. This is only comparable to what was done to the Jews
during WWII. All the three countries, Bangladesh, Pakistan and India
are directly involved to this colossal human suffering in the modern
history of mankind.
Genocide and Crime Against Humanity in Bangladesh
Part 2
By Abinash Baghchi
Bangladesh
9. Fate of three contemporary leaders and genocide in East Pakistan
10. Destiny of Bangladesh
11. Inevitable
12. International communities
13. Immediate actions necessary in Bangladesh
14. Time to retreat and show Islamic mercy in
Bangladesh-Kashmir-Palestine
15. An one eyed man and war on terrorism
16. The dilema
9. Fate of three contemporary leaders and genocide in East Pakistan
Have the tragic and violent deaths of the three contemporary
undisputable leaders of the peoples in their respective lands in the
Indian-subcontinent, anything to do with the genocide on about three
million hindus in East Pakistan (many Pakistanis and Bangladeshis do
not believe in the term Indian-subcontinent, but they believe that
their countries have fallen out of the heaven) ?
If you believe in god or not, does not matter. The reasoning can be
fitted in both philosophies, the punishment by the god or by the
rule of nature. Let us look through briefly, how these three leaders
directly and indirectly, were responsible for the most horrendous
crime against humanity and genocide in the post WWII era, mainly on
the civilian hindu populations in the then East Pakistan in 1971 and
their fate.
1. The background player (Nato Raj in Bengali) of this diabolic
tragedy was probably Mr. Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (ZAB). Most probably he
was personally involved as the chief of the policy making and as
adviser during the whole process, who was executed by the Pakistani
militaries. If this gentleman played his political role what he was
supposed to play, the history of the colossal human tragedy could
probably have been avoided. Departure of this gentle man happened
through a very long and painful process which even a common criminal
is not subjected to, anywhere in this earth where at least some
civilization exists. Later the rest of the male members of his family
were also murdered in violent ways.
2. The undisputable leader in the post partition period in East
Pakistan was Mr. Shaikh Mujibur Rahman (BBSMR), the architect and
founder of the nation Bangladesh with his unparallel leadership. He
was awarded the title no body received earlier, in spite of his role
in the hindu muslim rioting in Calcutta prior to partition in 1947. He
promised to the Bengali people irrespective of religion in the East
Pakistan, a country based on justice and happiness, the Switzerland of
the east. Majority of the people of East Pakistan, with exception of
considerable number muslim collaborators (who were part of the crime
on genocide), supported him in his long struggle for the liberation of
Bangladesh from the bondage of slavery.
Probably under the compulsion of the Islamic Brotherhood or Ummaism,
Mr. BBSMR of Bangladesh (BD), few years after the liberation of BD,
forgave the horrendous crime of this dimension with collaboration with
the other two leaders, which he neither had authority nor mandate to
do so. Actually, no human being or leaders of what so ever power
he/she might possess, has no mandate to do so. Even after more than 60
years , the associates of the nazis are still being being investigated
for their possible crime (read the difference between barbarism and
civility).
We were told how big hearted this person was, actually a very
heartless person can just forget the violent brutal murder of so many
peoples by the devilish power. It is not revenge but justice that is
why a state exists otherwise a state ceases to exist, examples in the
history are plenty even at these days. In this case the word justice
was raped even more barbarously than what the Pakistanis did, those
peoples (the core leaderships surrounding BBSMR) simply did not have
the capacity to understand the consequences of writing off crime of
such magnitude. Just think, in addition of the family of BBSMR, how
the other core leaderships of pre- and post independent Bangladesh
braced their fate.
The departure of BBSMR was violent albeit quite quickly, but the
brutality used in this case was only permissible in the name of the
holy Book. It was in the darkness of a night in August 1975, when the
devils landed in the city of Dhaka in the disguise of human beings. In
the darkness, they committed one of the most gruesome murder of so
many civilians while they were sleeping. The civilized human society
has not witnessed in recent times such brutality. Not even a child or
pregnant women were spared, cruelty was boundless. Still today the
cry for the justice can be heard, strange enough, even when Awami
League was in power they could not bring the devils to justice, what a
fate!
3. Mrs. Indira Gandhi, the then prime minister of India had the power
to stop or to minimise the genocide on the hindus in East Pakistan.
Instead of doing so, she started to conspire with her advisers (many
of them were Kashmiri pandits). This was planned to take possible
advantage over Pakistan over Kashmir problem. She concealed the real
happenings in East Pakistan to the common people of India in
particular, and to the world in general. At that time many Bengali
muslims were also collaborating with the Pakistanis on the genocide on
hindus in East Pakistan. Moreover, she forced more than 12 million
hindus to return to BD without any guarantee of their security or
protection of their basic human rights. Still today the hindus are
considered directly or indirectly as enemy of the state of Bangladesh
(see many postings in BD related websites recently). Mrs. Gandhi even
shared a dias in the Ramna garden in Dhaka city to a public meeting
with Mr. BBSMR, on the land confiscated from Ramna Kalibari temple
authority which was destroyed in 1971 but was not allowed to rebuild,
the deity is still homeless.
No body was accounted for the massacare of three million human beings
in the East Pakistan, which India had the obligation to do so, as was
the allied forces in Germany after WWII. Although a war was won but
in no time the victory was transformed into colossal shameful defeat.
In the history, that war in 1971 would not be remembered more than a
third world battle because of the third world standard of the
leaderships of the biggest third world country in this earth.
Instead of bringing the most cruel war criminals, Mrs. Gandhi let them
go free in exchange of verbal assurance from ZAB to settle down the
Kashmir problem by accepting LOC. You see the results, not even the
rest of the Kashmiri pandits in the valley could live there although
it was administered by India, what a consequence! Later IG including
her two sons lost their lives in a very violent manner. You may make
your own assessment why and how these three leaders disappeared from
this earth including their closest male family members. Do you think
these are just co-incidences or there are some reasons behind the
brutal murders of these three leaders?
The above part is not written to hurt the feelings of the survivors
of the three most popular contemporary leaders of the subcontinent.
Those leaders had the capacity to change the fate of one billion plus
peoples of the sub-continent but the history has proved the opposite.
Because these persons were public figures and as a watcher of the
happenings of the last 4 decades in the sub-continent and as a human
entity belonging to this sub-continent, I have expressed my personal
assessment of the happenings in the pre and post 1971, during which
almost 3 million innocent defenseless civilians men, women, children,
were brutally murdered. Many of those peoples were murdered by simply
cutting their throats or bellies and were left to die of bleeding to
be watched by the public. The atrocities surpassed many times the
horrible cruelty the world has watched how journalist Daniel Pearl
was murdered in Pakistan recently. Witnesses of these crimes can be
traced everywhere in Bangladesh and can be testified by those butchers
of the Pakistani army who are still alive.
Even today the devilish forces, are trying to downplay by different
forms, the gravity of this crime against humanity. If you have not
seen the faces of devils just turn on the page
(http://main.faithfreedom.org/Gallery/gallery.htm), this is too
devilish to be true at this age. Nobody has ever heard if these
perpetrators (those in Bangladesh) have brought to justice.
10. Inevitable
If you see the sufferings of so large number of peoples, during so
long time in the eastern part of Bengal (present Bangladesh), you may
naturally ask is this crime is going to be unpunished ? I hardly think
so. Some of the consequences, I have tried to reason above. But those
are minor compared with the sufferings of humanity of such
dimension.
Both India and Pakistan have acquired atomic weapons, although they
might have different objectives. It seems, God has sent his own
artisans (if you believe in god) to build these weapons which are
meant to be used in the future. This may be inevitable because both
Pakistan and India (the then rulers in particular), are more or less
equally responsible for the genocide in East Pakistan, and almost all
the perpetrators are still waiting to be brought to justice. A large
number of people of these two countries are probably going to be
targeted for unprecedented destruction, according to my personal
guess.
You may ask why innocent peoples have to suffer for the crimes done by
others. This is the verdict of the nature (if you do not believe in
god). Very seldom the justice comes immediately. In the individual
level it may come very quickly (as in the case of the three leaders),
but in case of collective crime, it can take even generations to pay
back. Examples in the history are plenty, just look around you. If you
ask what punishment is waiting for Bangladesh, just have a look below,
although you may not agree.
11. Destiny of Bangladesh
The country was promised to be Switzerland of the East, instead,
within 30 years of freedom it has achieved at least two World titles,
and almost the third one:
1. The poorest country in the world (matters very little if a few
countries below BD)
2. The most corrupted country in the world (it also matters very
little if Nigeria or any other country is just below BD)
3. The country has almost reached its third objective, destination
Somalia (not to offend Somalian brothers and sisters). This aspect
needs a bit more clarification:
After some years of liberation, the destination towards modern life
was abandoned , and readjusted towards Mecca. After trying very hard,
even selling camel jockeys (probably hundreds or thousands (?) in
numbers of children were sold to the Arabs from Bangladesh), we could
not achieve a better title from our Ummah brethren, they still call us
Miskeen. Due to this and the situation prevailing in the world, the
new destination was again readjusted, a bit further away and this time
towards Somalia (speak 100 % Arabic and 100 % Sunni muslims).
This national destination (chalo chalo Mogadishu !) is adapted after
hard planing even with our Ummah brethren and our intellectuals, to
disintegrate the society completely and subject its people to total
caos and anarchy and terror to implement the Islamic
Ummaism. You see, where everybody is looking forward to reach other
planets in the universe, except the muslim countries who are in
competetion among themselves how quickly they can run backwords to
reach the darkness of the 7th century.
My question, does Bangladesh need any more punishment ? Well, what
more you need? Just within 30 years of its liberation the population
is doubled from 75 millions to at present 140 millions, and a large
portion of these human beings do not even get food per day what a
chicken gets in the Western countries. Moreover, eruptions have
already begun before the violent volcanic explosion in this country
during which the human sufferings may surpass many times what they did
to the hindus in 1971, my very personal guess.
12. International communities
Do the western countries and the International communities have any
responsibility to alleviate these human sufferings? Reply may be both
yes and no, depending on the direct national and International
interests. Recent examples are Bosnia, Kosovo, East Timor etc.
However, the West was not so generous towards the Kurds. Thousands of
Kurds (100% Sunni muslims) were gassed to death, and hundreds of
thousands (millions ?) were driven out of their homes in Irak,
millions in Turkey are fighting for their self determination (see
later, muslims use this word only when they are in conflict with
non-muslims) and nobody including International communities or the
muslim Ummahs or muslim intelligentsia uttered a word.
If a crime could be stopped by them (the International communities in
such cases) who have the capacity to do so but was not done, the moral
responsibility still be there. The International communities have seen
helplessly what happened in 9/11. If the devilish Talibans were
destroyed a bit earlier, the tragedy of 9/11 could probably been
avoided. Now many in the West have no idea what a monster is in the
offing in Bangladesh with the direct Sino-Pakistan-Arabic conspiracy
to destroy the Indian/Tibetian civilization. This may not affect the
West immediately, but the long term impact woul be beyond imagination.
13. Immediate actions necessary in Bangladesh
Bangladesh has completely failed to protect its minority communities
and its Governments have been systematically perpetrating crime
against humanity/ethnic cleansing against them violating all
International rules. The International community should immediately
consider the following for the interest of the mankind as they have
done in Bosnia, Kosovo and in East Timor.
-Under International supervision, the genocide in the then East
Pakistan should be investigated and the perpetrators (all responsible
dead or alive) should be brought to justice
To constitute independent enquiry under the supervision of UN and
proper representatives of hindu communities to document all who were
murdered during 1971
Under international supervision new independent census should be done
immediately
To restructure the existing security, administrative and judiciary
apparatus with mixed population with modern education as being done in
Kosovo and Bosnia
All crimes committed towards minority communities in recent years
should be put on trial and the criminals should be brought to justice
All the properties taken away should be recovered and given back, or
compensation according to International norms should be provided to
the affected hindus and other minority community
All the displaced peoples who were forcefully transferred to distant
areas in India should be brought back close to their homeland
To make easy and simple procedures to reunite and visit millions of
the Bengali hindus in India and in Bangladesh
These have to be done under UN authority, preferably by direct
supervision of the British Government who bears moral obligation for
the sufferings of the hindus in Bangladesh.
There are other possible alternative solutions of this colossal human
tragedy e.g., organised population exchange (India and Pakistan were
bound with this obligation based on the statue of partition of India),
problem is Indian muslims do not want to migrate to Bangladesh, or
creation of protected land for hindus within Bangladesh under the
supervision of UN as in the case of Kossovo.
14. Time to retreat and show Islamic mercy in
Bangladesh-Kashmir-Palestine
If carefully examined, mainly two conflicts as I mentioned in the
beginning, to be named Palestine and Kashmir, have virtually kept the
entire humanity as their hostage by instigating the menace of
terrorism in the name of Islam. Very often muslim terrorists, muslim
leaders including muslim intellectuals claim these two conflicts, are
the root causes of all terrorism.
Most of the people, however, would agree that the root causes of all
Islamic terrorisms are in the teachings of Koran. Interrelationship
of the root causes of international terroirism can be traced from the
words and deeds in Bangladesh, Kashmir, Pakistan, Palestine, Arabs,
and other muslim countries and also in the countries where there are
substantial muslim communities.
Kashmiris and Palestinians, and invariably all muslims (International
Terrorism Inc. you may call it) have more or less tuned views on these
two issues. If one analyzes these two conflicts between muslims and
non-muslims, the number of peoples involved and killed are very small
fraction what is going on between muslims themselves, and between
muslims and non-muslims elsewhere. Such examples are plenty,
Afghanistan, Pakistan, Algeria, Morocco and Sahara, Somalia, Sudan,
Indonesia, Turkey, Irak, Thailand, Philippines, Bangladesh, India,
Kashmir, Pakistan, Chechnya, Russia. Somebody can help with real
statistics. Similar conflicts may be predicted in some Western cities
in near future (my personal guess within 30 to 50 years).
Wherever you find considerable number of muslims (either majority or
minority) you find hatred, unrest, chaos, insecurity, terror, and
policy of self destruction. Now a days if you walk around in any
western airports and malls, everybody looks at you if your appearance
is like an Arab or Indians (thanks to the Pakistanis!). See, what
those muslim terrorists have done in some hours not only to others on
9/11, but also to themselves and it may take ages to reverse that, if
that would be possible at all.
Keeping aside the controversy of the legality of accession of Kashmir
for a moment, just remember again that all the non-muslims have been
killed in the Pakistan occupied Kashmir, very few could escape. Even
in the Indian part, many of the non-muslims have been killed and the
rest have been driven out of their homes (more or less what has been
done and being done in the rest of hindus in Pakistan/Bangladesh).
Now the question, who has empowered the Kashmiri muslims, Pakistanis,
Bangladeshis to kill and clean up those lands from the non-muslims
(just some centuries ago these lands were inhabited by 100 %
non-muslims)? Has any majority population group right to deny the
right to exist or deny the basic human rights of the minorities?
Often the Pakistanis/Bangladeshis and the Kashmiri muslims mention
self determination of Kashmiris, by which they mean their right
granted by the holy book to eliminate and destroy the traces of the
indigenous civilization. Interesting to note that, at the same time it
would be difficult to find any muslim country in the world, where even
their own muslim populations have the right of self determination in
real meaning.
The question is, how the Kashmiri fierce sunni muslims are different
from the other ethnical and religious groups in the whole undivided
India? Are the Kashmiri sunni (Wahabi) muslims are a separate human
race belonging outside the greater Indus civilization ? Are the
Kashmiri Sunni muslims are different from the Panjabi, or Bihari or UP
sunni muslims in India, or are they entitled naturally to possess
more rights than any other ethnic groups/citizens in Pakistan or in
India?
Millions of hindus (much more in numbers of the Kashmiri sunni
muslims) from both Pakistan and East Pakistan/Bangladesh have migrated
to India (muslims also migrated from India to these countries but much
fewer in numbers). What is the problem for those fierce Kashmiri sunni
muslims to migrate to Pakistan and Pakistani occupied part of Kashmir
or anywhere they think they belong to, and leave the other muslims
and non-muslim Kashmiris alone. At the same time they are happy to
enjoy tax payers money of the infidel Indians and running havoc by
instigating terrorism by targeting civilians, women and children for
murder and destruction and desecrating hindu religious places in that
land. Very often the muslim terrorists and some leaders of muslim
countries (see similarity) call Kashmir, Palestine including Israel,
countries like Indonesia etc. as muslim lands. How a land can become
muslim land, when this religion came to being only 14 hundred years
ago while the land mass of the earth may be millions of years old?
Kashmir is only a tiny state in the Indian union where muslims are
majority and number of populations is around 7-8 millions. Whereas, in
whole India more than 100 million muslims are housed, and they are
living as minorities in all the other states. Worthy to mention here
that the majority of the muslims voted for Pakistan, but most of them
decided to stay in India after partition. This has to be judged in the
wider context (this word is very popular to muslims to fool the West),
the principle the muslims practice-my house is mine and your house is
mine too. The question is, where the hindus from Bangladesh, Kashmir,
Pakistan would get some space for their survival in India?
In the case of the so called Palestine (in reality Arabs), the total
number of population is miniscule compared with size and the total
number of Arabs living in the surrounding states. Almost all Jews
peoples have either been killed or driven out of the Arabic countries.
Has the Jews people right to exist in the land which belonged to them
many centuries ago and was occupied by the Arabs later? While there
are so many Arab countries, why it is necessary to create another
bizarre state composed of two wings on two sides of Israel with only
several hundred thousands people instead of merging these two parts
with the adjoining Arab countries?
This question of Palestine-Israel-Indian -Sub-continent are linked
because of the historical connection. In both cases religion played
the deciding factor. Almost all muslims of the whole world are fierce
supporter of the division of India or any other country to break into
pieces in the name of religion, even they are a small fraction of the
whole population. At the same time they support to kill or force
millions of non-muslims out of their homes whenever they can. But when
it comes the right of the others to defend themselves, the muslims
start to take up and create issues to portray that they are the
victims.
Since the inception of the religion Islam, millions of Arabs have
migrated, invaded and captured almost half of Africa and Asia, and
up to central Europe. Even in modern times, millions of Arabs
including Palestinians have migrated and settled down in various parts
of the world, majority of them in the West. Being a born Egyptian, Mr.
Arafat has eternal right to lead the terrorism Inc. and create havoc
in Israel, but Israel does not even has the right to defend itself
forget about retaliation. Mr. Sharon being a Jew even has no right to
perform his religious duty in the most sacred worship place of the
Jews, because the muslims has created by violent force their third
important mosque there. This principle has been practiced by the
muslims everywhere they have put their feet. Thousands of temples have
been destroyed even in recent times in
India-Pakistan-Kashmir-Bangladesh, but you will hear their very loud
and noisy voice when one controversial mosque (one among the
innumerable mosques in the whole Indian subcontinent which were built
on destroyed Hindu temples) in India was damaged by the hindu
extremists.
If you count carefully the total number of Palestinians (including
those refugees living outside Gaza and West Bank) displaced and
killed, and compare that number of hindus killed and displaced only
from Bangladesh, not to mention of Afghanistan, you can see the
astonishingly difference (melon and peanut). Still almost all muslim
individuals and countries will not oppose Pakistan, Bangladesh and
Kashmir in genocide and ethnic cleansing of hindus, shikhs, buddhists,
but oppose even to the right of the existence of the few millions
Jews.
Worthy to mention that Israel did not occupy these parts by
aggression, but was captured when collective aggression was imposed on
it by the Arabs who aimed to destroy it. Although personally I do not
support that any human being should leave his/her own home or live
under occupation, but in reality it is happening all the time of the
history, isn't it ?. The demography of the world is continuously
changing (in recent times mainly because of the Islamic havoc),
examples are Bosnia, East