Huh? Give it up with the Idol BS.
KK
yet he keeps talking shit about Ellen and insists that "he won't work
with her". But he doesn't have an option to. Jimmy might as well
declare that he won't work with U2.
lab~rat >:-)
Well, you can rule out any possibility that I would ever play for
Miley Cyrus's Halloween party...
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
KK
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:24:09 GMT, KK <_K...@furburger.net> puked:
>
>>So - Stern's admitted that he was never approached about American Idol.
>>yet he keeps talking shit about Ellen and insists that "he won't work
>>with her". But he doesn't have an option to. Jimmy might as well
>>declare that he won't work with U2.
>
> Well, you can rule out any possibility that I would ever play for Miley
> Cyrus's Halloween party...
Prima donna!
KK
> idiot. you have no idea how the game is played, do you?
Yes, I do. If you're looking to get more money out of your employer than
they can pay, or that you're worth, you can approach the competition.
Unless there isn't any, then you can leak a plausible story about an
alternate career path.
As long as it's plausible, you can milk it and pretend you're considering
it, to worry your employer into thinking he'll lose you.
Stern fucked up "the game". He's been the boy who cried wolf so many
times, with every renegotiation, that Karmazin joked about it weeks ago,
before all this stupid AI talk.
His talk of a billion-dollar offer from Clear Channel? Not even fucking
*you* believed that one, Jimmy. And pretty much nobody believed he was
being considered for American Idol, either. Certainly nobody of any
consequence to his negotiations, and *absolutely* not Mel Karmazin.
But now he's acknowledged that there never *was* any real AI talk, and
he's still pretending to demand terms for his imaginary placement there
(he "won't work with Ellen", damnit!).
That's not "the game", bottom-rung-of-show-biz-guy. The game is to
generate real uncertainty about your next move. And he's done a terrible
job of floating *anything* plausible.
KK
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:24:09 GMT, KK <_K...@furburger.net> wrote:
>
Andrew
>
> But now he's acknowledged that there never *was* any real AI talk
>
He said that on day one, three weeks ago.
KK
>> But now he's acknowledged that there never *was* any real AI talk
>>
>>
> He said that on day one, three weeks ago.
First of all, who gives a shit? As long as he did say it, sometime, it's
retarded for him to talk like there is any serious discussion about it.
And second of all, since this is, I think, the second time you piped up
with this, no, he didn't acknowledge it at all on "day one".
The first day he was on the air after the "story" "broke", he said the
following things (from marksfriggin):
"Howard said he had a lot to talk about and he might just take that Idol
job that they were talking about in the paper this weekend."
"He said that Simon Cowell said that he wanted him to replace him and
that's how the whole rumor got started. Howard said he's not going to
comment on any discussions he may or may not have had with them over
there."
"Howard said people seem to think that he'd get them thrown off the air
if he was a judge. Howard said he knows how to judge and he's not going
to get them thrown off. "
"Howard took another call from a woman who said that she is a teacher and
she thinks that he'd be great as a judge. Howard said of course he would.
He said that the show will go away if he doesn't take over as a judge on
that show. The caller said that he has to do it because he'd be amazing.
Howard said he'll have to see. He said he's a high priced talent. Howard
said he thinks that Ryan Seacrest would leave the show if he joined. He
said that a lot of people are going to run away from that show if he
joins it. Howard said Ryan would end up on X-Factor with Simon if he
joined Idol. "
"Gary came in and asked if he has answered the question if there is any
validity to the rumor. Howard said he can not confirm or deny. Howard
said he would say it was all hearsay if he wanted him to."
"Howard said he can't imagine anyone else replacing Simon Cowell. He said
that no one else could do the job the right way."
"Howard said Gary called him to ask if he was really going to be the
judge. He said he didn't answer. Gary said it was actually email. Howard
said he's not telling anyone. Howard said Gary asked him like 10 times
this morning and he didn't tell him anything. He said he's already asked
them over at Idol if there's a place for Gary there."
Now, dummy, which of those things is Stern acknowledging that there were
no discussions and no reaching out to him from American Idol?
That day the Wrap Up Show continued with the speculation.
Andrew
"KK" <_K...@furburger.net> wrote in message
news:mEzhn.143799$OX4....@newsfe25.iad...
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:31:45 -0800, Andrew wrote:
>
>
>>> But now he's acknowledged that there never *was* any real AI talk
>>>
>>>
>> He said that on day one, three weeks ago.
>
> First of all, who gives a shit? As long as he did say it, sometime, it's
> retarded for him to talk like there is any serious discussion about it.
>
> And second of all, since this is, I think, the second time you piped up
> with this, no, he didn't acknowledge it at all on "day one".
>
He sure did, don't give me a synopsis from marksfriggin, if you don't
believe it find a transcript.
I heard the show. I know what I heard.
He said it was for a show on a network other than FOX that contacted him.
AI is on FOX, so use some damn logic.
--
-Andrew
KK
>>> idiot. you have no idea how the game is played, do you?
(...)
>>That's not "the game", bottom-rung-of-show-biz-guy. The game is to
>>generate real uncertainty about your next move. And he's done a
>>terrible job of floating *anything* plausible.
>
> wow, i hope he doesn't have to move into the salvation army.
Nice non sequitur, deek. Point is, your smarmy line ...
"idiot. you have no idea how the game is played, do you?"
... was just fucking stupid.
How's the hangover?
KK
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:50:58 GMT, KK <_K...@furburger.net> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:31:45 -0800, Andrew wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> But now he's acknowledged that there never *was* any real AI talk
>>>>
>>>>
>>> He said that on day one, three weeks ago.
>>
>>First of all, who gives a shit? As long as he did say it, sometime,
>>it's retarded for him to talk like there is any serious discussion about
>>it.
>
> hey, it's the old "whatever/who gives a shit" argument you get so mad
> when i use! douchebag says what?
Actually, stupid, no, it's not.
When you say "whatever" or blow off whatever answer someone's given to
whatever brainless tripe you've posted, it's because you'd rather dismiss
it than address it.
That wasn't the case here - when I said "who gives a shit?" it wasn't
because I was dismissing it. It was because the point's irrelevant.
My point was that Stern's a douche for acting like he's being considered
for AI when he just said that he wasn't being considered for AI. And
dopey's reply was that he acknowledged it weeks ago. So ... so? Does it
make any *more* sense that way? No.
And besides, he didn't.
> well that settlles it. nobody cares about stern, he's broke and dying,
> and opie and anthony can now take over the airwaves as the kings of
> comedy radio.
>
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Way to miss the point. Don't you feel dumb when you ignore salient
points instead of agreeing or rebutting them, over and over again?
KK
> "KK" <_K...@furburger.net> wrote in message
> news:mEzhn.143799$OX4....@newsfe25.iad...
>> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:31:45 -0800, Andrew wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> But now he's acknowledged that there never *was* any real AI talk
>>>>
>>>>
>>> He said that on day one, three weeks ago.
>>
>> First of all, who gives a shit? As long as he did say it, sometime,
>> it's retarded for him to talk like there is any serious discussion
>> about it.
>>
>> And second of all, since this is, I think, the second time you piped up
>> with this, no, he didn't acknowledge it at all on "day one".
>>
>>
> He sure did, don't give me a synopsis from marksfriggin, if you don't
> believe it find a transcript.
Suck a cock. I didn't claim he said it, you did. The onus is on you to
support your statement, not on me to support *your* claim.
> I heard the show. I know what I heard. He said it was for a show on a
> network other than FOX that contacted him. AI is on FOX, so use some
> damn logic.
I heard that too. He didn't say that on "day one". And besides, a lot
of not-queer people don't know what network AI is on. I certainly didn't.
And, more importantly, it doesn't matter *when* he said it. If he said
it, what he's saying now is stupid.
M'Balz Es-Hari
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:11:31 -0800, Andrew wrote:
>
> - Show quoted text -
Jesus Christ!
Change the fucking channel, then, or better yet, cancel your fucking
subscription!
I can't believe you guys that want to sit in here & complain about
Howard all the fucking time.
News flash, he's got the last laugh, because you are paying to listen
to him!!!
Personally, I can't stand Ellen & find it amusing to listen to him
trash her, come up with his crazy ideas like a trap door under the
singers, etc.
KK
You go suck a dick, too. I post about Stern in a Stern newsgroup about
what Stern says - and you're whining about what *I* say?
> News flash, he's got the last laugh, because you are paying to listen to
> him!!!
No, I'm not. I have best of Sirius for a year for free. If I didn't, I
can read MarksFriggin and download any show I feel like, as I've done for
four years.
> Personally, I can't stand Ellen & find it amusing to listen to him trash
> her, come up with his crazy ideas like a trap door under the singers,
> etc.
I don't like Ellen any more than you do. That's hardly the point.
x...@xxx.com
Maybe he can work with 2U the clone version of the band and a close
relative of one of the clones. Does anyone in that family have an
original cell in their brain?
Tiame Clearfeather
KK
So now cover bands are no good, either? You're a fucking mental case.
x...@xxx.com
Maybe you can show me where I said that. You know, if you don't have an
answer we couldn't possibly think less of you. It is okay if you don't
obsessively respond to every post. The 1000 idiot arguments you carry on
every day online are plenty.
KK
> KK wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:00:17 -0500, X...@XXX.COM wrote:
>>
>>
>>>KK wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>So - Stern's admitted that he was never approached about American
>>>>Idol. yet he keeps talking shit about Ellen and insists that "he won't
>>>>work with her". But he doesn't have an option to. Jimmy might as
>>>>well declare that he won't work with U2.
>>>
>>>Maybe he can work with 2U the clone version of the band and a close
>>>relative of one of the clones. Does anyone in that family have an
>>>original cell in their brain?
>>
>>
>> So now cover bands are no good, either? You're a fucking mental case.
>
> Maybe you can show me where I said that. You know, if you don't have an
> answer we couldn't possibly think less of you.
You disparagingly referred to "2U the clone version of the band and a
close relative of one of the clones". Did I misinterpret that, and you
really meant "the clone version of the band" to be good?
> It is okay if you don't
> obsessively respond to every post. The 1000 idiot arguments you carry on
> every day online are plenty.
Thanks for validating me, honey.
Drumrboy
LOL!
You can't stand to see anyone make fun of Shithand, can you?
M'Balz Es-Hari
No, YOU go suck a dick.
I fucking hate Rosie O'Fatass, Sandra Bernhardt, Joan Rivers, Kathy
Griffin & a few others.
When they are on, I change the channel, I don't come here & whine
about it.
At least you only have the rest of the year to suffer through your
subscription...
KK
Sometimes Stern's show is entertaining. I've said so here. When it's
not, talking about it here is much more fun.
So, like you change the channel when you hear things you don't like, why
don't you skip the posts you don't like? Will that work for you?
> At least you only have the rest of the year to suffer through your
> subscription...
I'm sure that when it's up, if I say I'll cancel, they'll renew it for
free.
x...@xxx.com
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:34:38 -0500, X...@XXX.COM wrote:
>
>
>>KK wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:00:17 -0500, X...@XXX.COM wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>KK wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>So - Stern's admitted that he was never approached about American
>>>>>Idol. yet he keeps talking shit about Ellen and insists that "he won't
>>>>>work with her". But he doesn't have an option to. Jimmy might as
>>>>>well declare that he won't work with U2.
>>>>
>>>>Maybe he can work with 2U the clone version of the band and a close
>>>>relative of one of the clones. Does anyone in that family have an
>>>>original cell in their brain?
>>>
>>>
>>>So now cover bands are no good, either? You're a fucking mental case.
>>
>>Maybe you can show me where I said that. You know, if you don't have an
>>answer we couldn't possibly think less of you.
>
>
> You disparagingly referred to "2U the clone version of the band and a
> close relative of one of the clones".
Which of those is not an apt description? They do in fact do nearly
identical copies of U2 songs and perform an act that is an imitatin of
the original. That makes them a U2 clone band, nothing original there.
One of the 2U guys is a brother of one of the Stern Howard Show guys
thus making him a close relative, no? Why do simple facts get your
panties in a bunch?
> Did I misinterpret that, and you
> really meant "the clone version of the band" to be good?
>
>
They are not meant to be good, they are meant to be a clone of U2. Your
opinion of them is supposed to be based on your opinion of the original
and how well they copy them. I'm not a big fan of U2 but from what I've
heard 2U does an excellent copy of their show.
>
>>It is okay if you don't
>>obsessively respond to every post. The 1000 idiot arguments you carry on
>>every day online are plenty.
>
>
> Thanks for validating me, honey.
Thats why we are here for you when the clones are off the air, hopefully
it keeps you from arguing with people in liquor stores.
x...@xxx.com
I stand it just fine, it's the stupidity and groupthink type imitation
that I make fun of. Jimmy and I have different ideas and motives, you
might notice that every thread doesn't wind up a "repeating old lines"
contest between Jimmy and me. Plus I get bored too quickly to keep up
with any of you for more than a few days.
x...@xxx.com
>
>>At least you only have the rest of the year to suffer through your
>>subscription...
>
>
> I'm sure that when it's up, if I say I'll cancel, they'll renew it for
> free.
XM used to do that, Sirius hasn't been doing it so far. They actually
cancelled me for the first time in 5 years when my best of sirius
subscription ran out. They told me I owed money for my XM bill but
forgave that when I ordered a new sub for my radio. I think they are
trying to make some money now.
KK
> KK wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:34:38 -0500, X...@XXX.COM wrote:
>>
>>
>>>KK wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:00:17 -0500, X...@XXX.COM wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>KK wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>So - Stern's admitted that he was never approached about American
>>>>>>Idol. yet he keeps talking shit about Ellen and insists that "he
>>>>>>won't work with her". But he doesn't have an option to. Jimmy
>>>>>>might as well declare that he won't work with U2.
>>>>>
>>>>>Maybe he can work with 2U the clone version of the band and a close
>>>>>relative of one of the clones. Does anyone in that family have an
>>>>>original cell in their brain?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>So now cover bands are no good, either? You're a fucking mental case.
>>>
>>>Maybe you can show me where I said that. You know, if you don't have an
>>>answer we couldn't possibly think less of you.
>>
>>
>> You disparagingly referred to "2U the clone version of the band and a
>> close relative of one of the clones".
>
> Which of those is not an apt description? They do in fact do nearly
> identical copies of U2 songs and perform an act that is an imitatin of
> the original. That makes them a U2 clone band, nothing original there.
> One of the 2U guys is a brother of one of the Stern Howard Show guys
> thus making him a close relative, no? Why do simple facts get your
> panties in a bunch?
Nothing's "in a bunch". You seem to use the word "clone" negatively, and
you used the word in associated with 2U. So either you're an
inconsistent, schizo, shithead, or you're a lying, inconsistent, schizo
shithead.
KK
> KK wrote:
>
>
>
>>>At least you only have the rest of the year to suffer through your
>>>subscription...
>>
>>
>> I'm sure that when it's up, if I say I'll cancel, they'll renew it for
>> free.
>
> XM used to do that, Sirius hasn't been doing it so far. They actually
> cancelled me for the first time in 5 years when my best of sirius
> subscription ran out.They told me I owed money for my XM bill but
> forgave that when I ordered a new sub for my radio. I think they are
> trying to make some money now.
Maybe they just know you're an asshole. My brother got a cheap ( <
$100 / yr ) rate, so I called and got both my subs changed to the same
price. That was about two weeks ago.
KK
> you have been exposed. you're done. your credibility is shot. your
> whole post was based on a lie. so now you are dishonest and stupid.
Uh, sure. My post was based on two facts:
1. Stern is not and was not in consideration for the AI spot. There was
no contact between AI and Stern.
1b. This is not in question; Stern has admitted it.
2. Stern continues to talk as though he's considering the position he
hasn't been offered.
The other homo's assertion is that ... Stern admitted it three weeks
ago. Meaning that Stern's been a lying douche for at least two weeks
longer than I thought he had.
Hardly a lie. Next time have someone read and explain to you, it might
help.
>
>>How's the hangover?
>
> ask your mother. she has an ass hangover from my giant dick.
You don't seem like a guy with a big dick. Or a guy who gets to use
whatever dick he has very often. (with someone else, I mean)
KK
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:17:33 GMT, KK <_K...@furburger.net> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:03:22 -0500, JimmyM wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:50:58 GMT, KK <_K...@furburger.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:31:45 -0800, Andrew wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> But now he's acknowledged that there never *was* any real AI talk
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> He said that on day one, three weeks ago.
>>>>
>>>>First of all, who gives a shit? As long as he did say it, sometime,
>>>>it's retarded for him to talk like there is any serious discussion
>>>>about it.
>>>
>>> hey, it's the old "whatever/who gives a shit" argument you get so mad
>>> when i use! douchebag says what?
>>
>>
>>Actually, stupid, no, it's not.
>>
>>When you say "whatever" or blow off whatever answer someone's given to
>>whatever brainless tripe you've posted, it's because you'd rather
>>dismiss it than address it.
>>
>>That wasn't the case here - when I said "who gives a shit?" it wasn't
>>because I was dismissing it. It was because the point's irrelevant.
>
> what the fuck is the difference? it's only irrelevant to you because it
> exposes you as a fucking liar. but it's very relevant. so answer the
> fucking charges.
What a moron. It's not relevant, and I explained why. So lick my taint,
unemployed zero.
>
>>My point was that Stern's a douche for acting like he's being considered
>>for AI when he just said that he wasn't being considered for AI. And
>>dopey's reply was that he acknowledged it weeks ago. So ... so? Does
>>it make any *more* sense that way? No.
>>
>>And besides, he didn't.
>
> hey fucknut, i heard the show. you did, too. you just pretend to get
> it from marksfriggin' then hope nobody remembers from 3 weeks ago. but
> you have been exposed as a fucking liar. it's over for you.
You really get all OCD when you get a catchphrase worked out, huh?
> you show me one salient point that you made. it's all a bunch of lies.
x...@xxx.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>So - Stern's admitted that he was never approached about American
>>>>>>>Idol. yet he keeps talking shit about Ellen and insists that "he
>>>>>>>won't work with her". But he doesn't have an option to. Jimmy
>>>>>>>might as well declare that he won't work with U2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Maybe he can work with 2U the clone version of the band and a close
>>>>>>relative of one of the clones. Does anyone in that family have an
>>>>>>original cell in their brain?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>So now cover bands are no good, either? You're a fucking mental case.
>>>>
>>>>Maybe you can show me where I said that. You know, if you don't have an
>>>>answer we couldn't possibly think less of you.
>>>
>>>
>>>You disparagingly referred to "2U the clone version of the band and a
>>>close relative of one of the clones".
>>
>>Which of those is not an apt description? They do in fact do nearly
>>identical copies of U2 songs and perform an act that is an imitatin of
>>the original. That makes them a U2 clone band, nothing original there.
>>One of the 2U guys is a brother of one of the Stern Howard Show guys
>>thus making him a close relative, no? Why do simple facts get your
>>panties in a bunch?
>
>
>
> Nothing's "in a bunch".
Exccept your panties.
> You seem to use the word "clone" negatively,
No I don't, you just have your panties in a bunch. I use it descriptively.
and
> you used the word in associated with 2U. So either you're an
You are a hypersensitive fanboi douche, I use words to describe things,
in these cases I am describing 2 acts which are copies of original asct
as "clones"
> inconsistent, schizo, shithead, or you're a lying, inconsistent, schizo
> shithead.
No, it seems you just have your little fanboy panties in a bunch. I also
notice that you don't think of your little stern rants on your own, you
seem to regurgitate them after they are brought up on the clones show. I
can see how you get so defensive about copying and not having any
original ideas now.
x...@xxx.com
>>
>>XM used to do that, Sirius hasn't been doing it so far. They actually
>>cancelled me for the first time in 5 years when my best of sirius
>>subscription ran out.They told me I owed money for my XM bill but
>>forgave that when I ordered a new sub for my radio. I think they are
>>trying to make some money now.
>
>
>
> Maybe they just know you're an asshole. My brother got a cheap ( <
> $100 / yr ) rate, so I called and got both my subs changed to the same
> price. That was about two weeks ago.
I will have a cheaper rate than $100 / year as long as the company stays
in business for 5 more years. When I had XM only I paid for the first
year and got the the next 4 years for free. You can unbunch your panties
now psycho.
KK
Here, watch closely.
You said:
" They actually cancelled me for the first time in 5 years ... I think
they are trying to make some money now."
I pointed out a very recent example of a discounted rate, to which you
replied
"When I had XM only I paid for the first year
and got the the next 4 years for free. "
So, to sum up:
You: the days of discounted subs were in the past and are over now.
Me: I just got my rate discounted.
You: I got a discounted rate a long time ago.
Now go look up "non sequitur" and see if it rings a bell.
x...@xxx.com
> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:44:48 -0500, X...@XXX.COM wrote:
>
>
>>KK wrote:
>>
>>>>XM used to do that, Sirius hasn't been doing it so far. They actually
>>>>cancelled me for the first time in 5 years when my best of sirius
>>>>subscription ran out.They told me I owed money for my XM bill but
>>>>forgave that when I ordered a new sub for my radio. I think they are
>>>>trying to make some money now.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Maybe they just know you're an asshole. My brother got a cheap ( <
>>>$100 / yr ) rate, so I called and got both my subs changed to the same
>>>price. That was about two weeks ago.
>>
>>I will have a cheaper rate than $100 / year as long as the company stays
>>in business for 5 more years. When I had XM only I paid for the first
>>year and got the the next 4 years for free. You can unbunch your panties
>>now psycho.
>
>
> Here, watch closely.
>
> You said:
> " They actually cancelled me for the first time in 5 years ... I think
> they are trying to make some money now."
>
> I pointed out a very recent example of a discounted rate, to which you
> replied
>
You added a non sequitur, good for you retard. You still make money when
you discount a rate, you don't make money when you don't charge people
anything. See the difference Mr. Has a stupid argument for everything?
> "When I had XM only I paid for the first year
> and got the the next 4 years for free. "
>
>
> So, to sum up:
>
> You: the days of discounted subs were in the past and are over now.
Liar. Try a more convincing lie. My point was that XM was not charging
me anything at all. Either due to disorganization or fear that I would
cancel, not sure which but it was free until I got the Sirius package
and that expired. I never said anything that could be construed as what
your convoluted logic concluded.
> Me: I just got my rate discounted.
You are such a lying asshole, either that or you are too stupid to
understand the simplest things.
> You: I got a discounted rate a long time ago.
Never said that, liar. I said "They didn't charge me anything for 4 years"
>
> Now go look up "non sequitur" and see if it rings a bell.
Go look up obsessed lying douchebag and see if you recognize yourself.
KK
Fuck, you're an ass. I made it as simple as I can: you said they aren't
giving discounts now because "they are trying to make money now" and I
have an example of a recent one. You gave a counter-example (for what
reason, I don't know) of a not-recent one. Which is meaningless.
x...@xxx.com
No I didn't say that and you are a fucking moron if you read that into
what I said and just a regular liar if you are repeating it knowing that
it makes no sense. I said nothing about discounts, they didn't charge me
anything for 4 years, probably because they needed to show subs more
than they needed to collect money. Now that they were taken over by
Sirius they are treating it like a normal business again and cancelling
subscribers who don't pay their bills. I can't imagine how stupid you
would have to be before you were unable to understand this.
> and I
> have an example of a recent one. You gave a counter-example (for what
> reason, I don't know) of a not-recent one. Which is meaningless.
Probably true for you, but you don't seem that bright so it is probably
only you.
KK
> it makes no sense.I said nothing about discounts, they didn't charge me
> anything for 4 years, probably because they needed to show subs more
> than they needed to collect money. Now that they were taken over by
> Sirius they are treating it like a normal business again and cancelling
> subscribers who don't pay their bills. I can't imagine how stupid you
> would have to be before you were unable to understand this.
Shithead: my comment that brought your ignorant response was about my
free "Best of Sirius". Not over something that would or wouldn't count
as a sub number.
x...@xxx.com
>>
>>No I didn't say that and you are a fucking moron if you read that into
>>what I said and just a regular liar if you are repeating it knowing that
>>it makes no sense.I said nothing about discounts, they didn't charge me
>>anything for 4 years, probably because they needed to show subs more
>>than they needed to collect money. Now that they were taken over by
>>Sirius they are treating it like a normal business again and cancelling
>>subscribers who don't pay their bills. I can't imagine how stupid you
>>would have to be before you were unable to understand this.
>
>
>
> Shithead: my comment that brought your ignorant response was about my
> free "Best of Sirius". Not over something that would or wouldn't count
> as a sub number.
No it didn't, my comment showed the obvious, XM didn't collect money
because they were afraid of cancellations. Now that Sirius owns XM they
are collecting money and cancelling people who took advantage of their
need to keep subs. You are just a logic twisting moron. Call mensa and
see if they know who you are. You're a semi psychotic geek, have you hit
350 lbs yet?
KK
> KK wrote:
>>>
>>>No I didn't say that and you are a fucking moron if you read that into
>>>what I said and just a regular liar if you are repeating it knowing
>>>that it makes no sense.I said nothing about discounts, they didn't
>>>charge me anything for 4 years, probably because they needed to show
>>>subs more than they needed to collect money. Now that they were taken
>>>over by Sirius they are treating it like a normal business again and
>>>cancelling subscribers who don't pay their bills. I can't imagine how
>>>stupid you would have to be before you were unable to understand this.
>>
>>
>>
>> Shithead: my comment that brought your ignorant response was about my
>> free "Best of Sirius". Not over something that would or wouldn't count
>> as a sub number.
>
> No it didn't
"No it didn't"? Please make sense.
KK
> yeah, i'm convinced he's a real mess. that's ok, everyone's a mess in
> their own way. but yeah, that's pretty fuckin' messy what's going on
> there.
Right, I'm a "mess" because I won't tell XXX that his drivel makes
sense. I suppose if you're reaching for straws and guessing about
personal details about someone you've never met, I can take that as
acknowledgement that you've abandoned your dopey premise.
x...@xxx.com
See how stupid you are? Someone who could read would understand.
KK
I am going to break down the sentences into subject/verb (because you
obviously can't) and you tell me which one "No it didn't" logically
follows.
"My comment ... was about"
"[it was] Not over something"
KK
> oh please, you fucking hypocrite asshole! look at how you and shitfoot
> went looking on the internet for personal details about me and guessing
> about other ones. go fuck yourself, you fucking hypocrite you.
Eat my ass. I wasn't the one who looked up your address or showed up at
your house. In fact, after it happened I immediately said that it was a
shitheaded move to knock on your door.
And while digging up personal data on you was wrong, it's not at all the
same thing as just making up shit you don't know anything about.
KK
> ok, that's true, i have to admit.
Ok, good. Whatever insults we throw around or how stupid we think the
other is about a radio show, or about what we perceive the other person's
contribution to the planet is, I don't want to be associated with
anything that actually physically threatened anyone's home or family.
If I ever have to shoot an intruder, I really don't want them to be from
this newsgroup.
>
>>And while digging up personal data on you was wrong, it's not at all the
>>same thing as just making up shit you don't know anything about.
>
> oh, you'll use it if you know it. don't act like you're hands are 100%
> clean. i've got my eye on you, motherfucker.
>
> ;)
I could lose a few pounds. But I'm nowhere near 300, and I work out.
lab~rat >:-)
>>>Eat my ass. I wasn't the one who looked up your address or showed up at
>>>your house. In fact, after it happened I immediately said that it was a
>>>shitheaded move to knock on your door.
>>
>> ok, that's true, i have to admit.
>
>Ok, good. Whatever insults we throw around or how stupid we think the
>other is about a radio show, or about what we perceive the other person's
>contribution to the planet is, I don't want to be associated with
>anything that actually physically threatened anyone's home or family.
>
>If I ever have to shoot an intruder, I really don't want them to be from
>this newsgroup.
Oh come on, wouldn't it be funny if some illiterate guy tried to break
into your house and you shot him in the leg and it was Marrone?
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
KK
The leg?
lab~rat >:-)
I was being generous here. Besides, it would do him more damage than
if you shot him in the head...
KK
Point taken.
Drumrboy
> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:51:59 GMT, KK <_...@furburger.net> puked:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:08:47 -0500, lab~rat >:-) wrote:
>
>
> >>>>>Eat my ass. I wasn't the one who looked up your address or showed up
> >>>>>at your house. In fact, after it happened I immediately said that it
> >>>>>was a shitheaded move to knock on your door.
>
> >>>> ok, that's true, i have to admit.
>
> >>>Ok, good. Whatever insults we throw around or how stupid we think the
> >>>other is about a radio show, or about what we perceive the other
> >>>person's contribution to the planet is, I don't want to be associated
> >>>with anything that actually physically threatened anyone's home or
> >>>family.
>
> >>>If I ever have to shoot an intruder, I really don't want them to be from
> >>>this newsgroup.
>
> >> Oh come on, wouldn't it be funny if some illiterate guy tried to break
> >> into your house and you shot him in the leg and it was Marrone?
>
> >The leg?
>
> I was being generous here. Besides, it would do him more damage than
> if you shot him in the head...
Bwaahahahahahaaaa!!
Drumrboy
> shitfoot went looking on the internet for personal details about me
> and guessing about other ones. go fuck yourself, you fucking
> hypocrite you.
I never posted anything that you didn't post first, Shithand.
x...@xxx.com
I was comparing you to the comic book guy, I think you based your
personality on him.
KK
Let's pretend for a second anyone knows who the fuck you're talking
about ...
Locutus
"KK" <_K...@furburger.net> wrote in message
news:Dkejn.2517$NH1...@newsfe14.iad...
lol.. I can't believe you guys are still at it. I think you 4 are the only
people left in this NG.
lab~rat >:-)
KK
What, did you get paroled?
Locutus
usenet is dead. But you guys are still entertaining.