Charles Bishop <
ctbi...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> Ah. Sacramento. Presumably, it used to continue to San Francisco but
>> the western section was replaced by I-80, and California doesn't believe
>> in dual-numbered highways (whereas in Utah, much of US 50 follows I-70).
>
>I didn't know that about CA and dual numbered highways. I went to a map
>to see what happened to Hwy 1 when it meets 101 in Oxnard, and the map
>doesn't indicate that 1 runs along 101. The map could be leaving out
>info, but I'd rather believe you.
>
>What happens to Hwy 1 in these cases? Does it cease to exist until it
>pops up again just (logical) north of Gaviota St Park?
BC goes both ways. There are multiple numbers on some highways, and
multiple highways with a given number in other cases.
Highway 99 shares pavement with Highway 1, then further south it
shares a bridge with 1A.
Highway 5 and 97C are collectively "Coq A, Coq B, and Coq C". 5A
appears a dozen or so miles east of the 97C and 5 crossing, but I
don't think that they dual-number that stretch of Coq C.
In BC, generally low numbers are east-west, (1,3,7) high 2 digit
numbers are north-south, (97, 99) and diagonal highways get numbers
areound the middle. The portion of Highway 5 that I'm aware of is
diagonal, but it inherited the number from the old Princeton-Merritt
highway that was generally horizontal.
--
We are geeks. Resistance is voltage over current.