Huge two foot wide yellow stripe down Obama's back.

[Lucas]

This responsibility ducking coward was trying to get out of
office while dumping a war on the Republicans who are surely
going to sweep out the Democrats in November 2014.

Face it liberals, Barack Hussein Obama is a big-mouthed
ineffective wuss.

 

[Topaz]

"BOTH Republicans AND Democrats are hypocrites and cowards, because
both have sold out America and the American gross domestic product
(GDP) to Israel. The United States does not exist anymore as a
sovereign entity and all our energy, all our societal efforts are
dedicated to supporting Israel first, Israel second, and Israel third.

America is a Jew-ocracy that is run for the Jews, by the Jews, and of
the Jews, because America is a Jewish owned corporation, not a
"democracy." Votes don't matter much here in the USA because
Washington runs on money, not on votes, and Democratic presidential
candidate Senator Hillary Clinton is just as sold out to the Israeli
lobby, AIPAC (the America Israel Public Affairs Committee), as
Republican presidential candidate Senator Bill Frist. Former
president Bill Clinton was sold out, Jimmy Carter was sold out and
later admitted it after he left office, Ronald Reagan was sold out,
all American presidents were sold out going back to JFK..

All our Middle East problems, our vast national debt, our collapsing
economy, and our collapsing standard of living are all directly the
result of our blind support for Israel's illegal ethnic cleansing of
Palestinians from Palestine. Bush used Israeli torture techniques on
Moslems, our leaders have let Israeli agents here in the USA illegally
spy on American citizens, we ignore UN Resolutions that tell Israel
to go retreat to their 1967 borders as international law mandates. We
routinely block the United Nations from taking action against Israel's
illegal activities. We gave Israel plutonium and helped them build
their atomic and hydrogen bombs, we shoveled Israel over 140 billion
in foreign aid since 1950, and we have wasted 3 to 4 trillion dollars
in total on the cult of Zionism since 1950 through the cost of illegal
wars, oil embargoes, foreign aid, and the cost of the strategic oil
reserve. Frankly, the Jews are bleeding America dry and no one is
courageous enough to stand up to the Jews because Jews in America are
the exact equivalent of George Orwell's BIG BROTHER. Jews tell us all
what to do, what we are allowed to think, and what we are allowed to
speak. Jews control our government, dominate our media, and crush any
opposition by slandering those with legitimate and provable complaints
as "anti-Semites."

It must be great to be above criticism and to control the stupid and
dull Christian masses and laugh at them behind their backs and even to
their faces and get no response other than more feet licking, bowing,
and kow towing. George Bush is a useful idiot, a water carrier for
the Jews just as Hillary Clinton will be if elected president. Both
Iraq wars were started for the Jews and by the Jews. All our
politicians are a disgrace and we will never regain our sovereignty,
solve our foreign policy problems, or balance our budget until we end
our slavish allegiance to the immoral, racist, murdering, torturing,
lying, stealing, manipulating cult nation of Israel.

The Holocaust business feeds the Zionist cult and Hollywood has
deified Jews while vilifying Moslems...

Our nation is a lying, hypocritical mess and the world hates us
because the world knows we are a nation of morons run by Jews. Where
are the brave and honest Americans who speak with one face, not two?
Americans are defeated, weak, foolish, and can't even speak out
because they are scared like little girls, unable to even speak the
word "Jew" unless in praise or on bended knees. Imagine if Catholics
or Moonies or the Mafia had that much control in America! Jews are
not above the law and Jews can be opposed for their real world crimes
just like anyone else. Our brains are frozen by decades of media
programming and propaganda so that now we cannot even speak the "J
word." Political correctness, which was invented by Jews as a form of
mind control, prevents Americans from being fully human. We are a
nation of slaves, licking Jewish feet day after day and we never get
tired of it. It's a sad and pathetic situation and we are a sad and
pathetic people who deserve the contempt of the world because we have
no backbone and no honesty.

The United Kingdom is little better than the USA because Tony Blair is
a rabid Christian Zionist himself and most of his top advisors are
Jews. Much of Europe is sold out and controlled by Jews and the cult
of Zionism has Western leaders by the testicles, frozen and unable to
fight back. Now is the time to speak up, to fight back, and to do it
legally, responsibly, and effectively. Just decide that from now on
Jews have no special privileges in your brain and that you can
criticize Jews just like Republicans, Democrats, Catholics, Moonies,
or any other group. Jews act as a 90% unified group, commit crimes as
a 90% unified group, and control America as a 90% unified group, and
thus deserve to be criticized as a 90% unified group. Being able to
criticize those who do harm is what democracy means and is exactly
what freedom of thought means. Become a fully functioning human being
and not just another mind controlled blob of useless DNA!"

inkyblacks

http://www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org http://www.bpp.org.uk

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com

[Governor Swill]

"Lucas" <luc...@krafts.com> wrote:

>This responsibility ducking coward was trying to get out of
>office while dumping a war on the Republicans who are surely
>going to sweep out the Democrats in November 2014.

You mean like the TWO wars Bush dumped on the Democrats in 2008?

>Face it liberals, Barack Hussein Obama is a big-mouthed
>ineffective wuss.

That opinion fall out of your ass just now or have you been playing
with it for a while?

Swill
--
What Republicans are really scared of is that the economy
*won't stop* getting better.

[Governor Swill]

Now that it's become clear that the Republicans, the fiscally
conservative, strong on defense party, are neither fiscally
conservative nor strong on defense, they have to tell us what exactly
it is they're good at.

Because it's not defense. 9/11 happened on your watch. And you
retaliated by invading the wrong country. And you lost a 10-year game
of hide-and-seek with Osama bin Laden. And you're responsible for
running up most of the debt, which, more than anything, makes us weak.

You're supposed to be the party with the killer instinct. But it was
a Democrat who put a bomb in Gaddafi's bedroom and a bullet in bin
Laden's eye like Moe Greene. Raising the question, how many Muslims
does a black guy have to kill in one weekend before crackers climb
down off his ass?

Let's look at some facts. Now, for you Fox News viewers, feel free to
turn down the sound until the flashing "FACTS" light at the bottom of
your screen disappears.

When Bill Clinton left office in 2001, the Congressional Budget Office
predicted that by the end of the decade, we would have paid off the
entire debt, and have a $2 trillion dollar surplus. Instead, we have
a $10.5 trillion dollar public debt, and the difference in those two
numbers is mostly because the Republicans put tax cuts for the rich,
free drugs for the elderly, and two wars on the layaway plan, and
then bailed on the check. So much for fiscal responsibility.

But hey, at least they still had the defense thing, right? The public
still believed Republicans were tougher when it came to hunting down
dark-skinned foreigners with funny-sounding names. But Bush had
seven years to get Osama. He didn't. He got Wesley Snipes.

Only 6 months after 9/11, Bush said he didn't spend that much time on
bin Laden, adding that he was no longer concerned about him, just as
he wasn't before 9/11, when he blew off that mysterious, inscrutable
memo entitled "Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the U.S."
In under a year, Bush went from "Who gives a shit?" to "Wanted: Dead
or Alive" and back to "Who gives a shit". Why focus on the terrorist
who reduced Wall Street to rubble, when you can help Wall Street
reduce the whole country to rubble?

In 2008, the candidates were asked, if they knew for sure that bin
Laden was in Pakistan, would you send our guys in without permission
to get him?

McCain said no, because Pakistan is a sovereign nation.

Obama said yes, he'd just do it.

And McCain called him naďve. Who's being naďve, K? And why can't you
just admit that Barack Obama is one efficient steely-nerved
multitasking black ninja gangsta President?

In one week, he produced his birth certificate, comforted disaster
victims, swung by Florida to say hey to Gabby Giffords, did stand-up
at the Correspondents Dinner, and then personally repelled into bin
Laden's lair and put a Chinese star through his throat without waking
up any of his 13 wives! That's how it went down, I saw it on MSNBC.

Look, 30% of this country will always vote Republican. I'm just
asking why. Yes, paranoia, greed, and racism are fun, but it's like
when you see someone driving a Mercury. You think, did that person
really wake up one day and think, "You know what car I really want to
drive? A Mercury Mariner." No! You assume he knows someone who sells
them, or he was molested by a KIA dealer as a child.

And I know this all sounds like harsh truth, but Republicans are
supposed to be the party of harsh truths. Like, there's no such thing
as a free lunch.

And speaking of lunch, I think Obama just ate yours.



Thanks, Bill!
--
"All the sinners are just Saints without sparks, and it's getting
harder to tell them apart." -- Jamiroquai

[Topaz]

CIA insider tells 911 truth. Time to re-examine your World-view,
America!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnbMjAN7Bws

The sudden, complete, straight down at near free-fall speed collapse
of steel framed WTC building 7, which was not touched by the planes,
is the SMOKING GUN of the 9/11 conspiracy. The building's few small
fires and superficial debris damage could not account for this
collapse, which had all the earmarks of controlled demolition by
explosives. Videos clearly show this. Such demolitions take many days
or weeks to set up - not the few hours between the plane "attacks" and
the collapse. The explosives therefore had to be put in place
BEFOREHAND. This lends credibility to the use of previously placed
explosives to bring down the towers as well, which like the badly
damaged and fire-gutted Deutchbank building would probably have
remained standing.

Propaganda shills, disinformationists, and those in psychological
denial still insist the collapse of WTC 7 could not be what it
obviously was, and they employ often ludicrous rationalizations and
fabrications, elaborate lies, and infantile ad-hominem attacks to
defend their indefensible position. The REAL terrorists are desperate
to cover up their mass-murderous crime of the century - the permitting
if not perpetration of, and subsequent political and economic
exploitation of the fully preventable 9/11 disaster.

Could Bin Laden have somehow totally incapacitated NORAD - the world's
most sophisticated aerospace defense system - on that horrible
morning? I don't think so!

There is evidence of an INSIDE JOB even more clear and indisputable
than the explosive demolition collapse of building 7 and the standing
down of NORAD. Many very small HUMAN BODY FRAGMENTS have been found on
the roofs of nearby buildings. These were too far away to be from
jumpers from the towers. If the towers simply collapsed from damage
and fire alone, what blew these bodies to smithereens and sent the
fragments flying for considerable distances? The plane impacts did not
have the explosive brisance (shattering force) necessary to do this -
only HIGH EXPLOSIVES can blow bodies to tiny bits and throw them such
distances.

So - who can credibly account for these body fragments, other than
their being the result of high explosives being detonated in the
towers?


The NORAD STAND-DOWN (complete failure to take defensive action) is
compelling evidence of the 9/11 conspiracy. NORAD is the world's most
sophisticated aerospace defense system, with backups and redundancies
that make it extremely reliable and effective. NORAD routinely
intercepts off course or out of communication aircraft of all kinds,
especially near such security-sensitive areas as New York City and the
Pentagon. On 9/11, FOUR allegedly hijacked subsonic-speed commercial
jets were out of communication and flying towards known terrorist
targets for well over an hour. NOT ONE of these planes was intercepted
by NORAD! We were told that NORAD only looks for aircraft coming from
outside the USA, but this is a blatant LIE, given the history of
NORAD's routine interceptions!


The following article proves, using the inviolate laws of physics, the
falsity of the government's propaganda explanation for the World Trade
Center building collapses:

SIMPLE PHYSICS EXPOSES THE BIG 9/11 LIE - GOVERNMENT BUILDING COLLAPSE
EXPLANATION FAILS REALITY CHECK

On September 11, 2001, the world watched in horror as the World Trade
Center (WTC) Twin Towers collapsed, killing thousands of innocent
people. Videos of the collapses were replayed ad nauseam on TV for
days. About 5 hours after the towers fell, WTC building 7 also
collapsed suddenly, completely, and straight down at near free-fall
speed. This steel-framed building was not touched by the planes that
struck the towers, and had sustained relatively minor debris damage
and small fires. Nearby buildings far more heavily damaged remained
standing.

In June 2005, in an apparent response to an article by Morgan
Reynolds, former CIA Director and current Secretary of Defense Robert
Gates stated, "The American people know what they saw with their own
eyes on September11, 2001. To suggest any kind of government
conspiracy in the events of that day goes beyond the pale."

We will prove here, with scientific rigor, that it's the government's
tale that's "beyond the pale!"

Did most of the American people really understand the unprecedented
phenomena they had witnessed? Could a lack of knowledge of physics,
and the emotional shock of this mass-murderous "terrorist attack" have
stymied objective thinking and led to the blind acceptance of
authoritarian assertions?

The government and the media TOLD US what we saw. The government told
us that we had witnessed a "gravitational" collapse; what is now
referred to as a "pancake collapse". According to the government
claims, the plane crashes and subsequent kerosene (like lamp oil - jet
fuel is NOT exotic) fires heated the UL-certified structural steel to
the point where it was significantly weakened, which is very difficult
to believe, never mind repeat in an experiment. Even with massive
fires that incinerate everything else, the steel frames of such
buildings generally remain standing.

According to the "pancake theory", this purported (all physical
evidence was quickly and illegally destroyed) weakening supposedly
caused part of the tower to collapse downward onto the rest of the
tower, which, we've been repeatedly told, somehow resulted in a chain
reaction of the lower floors sequentially, one at a time, yielding to
the weight falling from above.

There are some problems with that theory - it does not fit the
observed facts

* It cannot account for the total failure of the immense vertical
steel core columns - as if they were there one moment and gone the
next.

* The collapse times were near free-fall, far too rapid to be due to
gravity
alone.

This "collapse" was not without far more physical resistance than from
the air alone. It proceeded through all the lower stories of the
tower. Those undamaged floors below the plane impact zone offered
resistance thousands of times greater than that of air. Those lower
stories, and the central steel core columns, had successfully
supported the mass of the tower for 30 years despite hurricane-force
winds and tremors. Air cannot do that.

Can anyone possibly imagine undamaged lower floors getting out of the
way of the upper floors as gracefully and relatively without friction
as air would? Can anyone possibly imagine the lower stories slowing
the fall of the upper floors less than would, say, a parachute?

What is certain, beyond any shadow of a doubt, is that the towers
could not have collapsed gravitationally, through their intact lower
stories, as rapidly as was observed on 9/11. Not even close. This is
shown to be physically impossible!


So WHERE DID ALL THAT ADDITIONAL DESTRUCTIVE ENERGY COME FROM?

Conclusions

In order for the towers to have collapsed "gravitationally" in the
observed duration, as we've been told over and over again, one or more
of the following zany-sounding conditions must have been met

* The undamaged structure below the impact zone offered zero
resistance to the collapse.
* The glass and concrete spontaneously disintegrated without any
expenditure of energy.
* The massive vertical steel core columns simply vanished, as if by
magic.

None of these laws-of-physics-violating, and thus impossible,
conditions can be accounted for by the official government theory of
9/11, nor by any of the subsequent analyses and arguments designed to
prop up this official myth of 9/11.

The Bottom Line


It is utterly impossible for a gravitational collapse to proceed so
destructively through a path of such great resistance in anywhere near
free-fall time. This fact debunks the preposterous contention that the
WTC collapses can be blamed solely upon damage resulting from the
plane impacts.

The unnaturally short durations of the top-down collapses reveal that
the towers did not disintegrate because they were coming down, but
rather they came down because something else was causing them to
disintegrate.

So, to the extent that people accept the ridiculous "pancake collapse"
story, former CIA Director and current Secretary of Defense Gates'
other premise, that people know what they saw, is also false. It is
left to you to decide if his conclusion, which was based upon clearly
incorrect presumptions, is also flawed.

The collapse of WTC building 7, which was NOT hit by any plane, also
collapsed within a second of free-fall time later that same day.

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060118104223192


Understanding the full truth of 9/11 seems to require two separate
awakenings.

The first, awakening to the fraudulence of the "official 9/11 story,"
is a pretty simple brain function and only requires a little study,
logic or curiosity. We can help a lot with that part here and it's a
major purpose of this site.

The second step, however, consciously confronting the implications of
that knowledge--and what it says about our media, politics and
economic system today--is by far the harder awakening and requires an
enormous exercise of nerve and heart. (As the Chinese say, "You cannot
wake up a man who is pretending to sleep.") In other words, this part
of the journey depends more on character than on maps and evidence so
we can't help you much here, except to point out inspiring heroes and
heroines who have courageously faced that truth, spoken out, and
survived...

[tonopah]

On 10/17/2014 11:46 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
> That opinion fall out of your ass

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:57:56 -0400, Governor Swill
<governo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>George Bush said he would control oil prices by persuading oil
>producers to increase production enough to prevent price increases.
>How is it then, that gas started going up as soon as Bush was sworn
>in?
That might be interesting if it had actually happenned but AGAIN
you've been CAUGHT LYING:

For reference here's

Clinton: Apr 05, 1993 106.8/gl. to Dec 25, 2000 145.3/gl. = 36%
Increase.

For Bush we have:

Jan 01, 2001 144.6 - Dec 31, 2001 113.7 = -21.4%

You said "gas started going up as soon as Bush was sworn in."

YOU LIED.

Bush promised to lower gas prices.

Bush lowered gas prices.

Then 9/11 happenned, then we invaded Afghanistan.

Then we have:

Jan 07, 2002 115.2 - Dec 30, 2002 148.4 = 28.8%

Then we have Bush and the Republicans beating the Democrats with
sticks so we could get gas

prices back under control:

Jan 06, 2003 148.7 - Dec 29, 2003 152.1 = 2.3%

Then we invaded Iraq:

Jan 05, 2004 155.2 - Dec 27, 2004 183.8 = 18.4%

Jan 03, 2005 182.4 - Dec 26, 2005 224.1 = 22.9%

Then we have Bush and the Republicans beating the Democrats with
sticks so we could get gas

prices back under control:

Jan 02, 2006 228.1 - Dec 25, 2006 238.7 = 4.6%

THEN WE HAVE DEMOCRATS RUNNING CONGRESS:

Jan 01, 2007 238.2 - Dec 31, 2007 310.4 = 30.3%

Jan 07, 2008 315.9 - Jun 16, 2008 413.4 = 30.9%

http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/wrgp/mogas_history.html

Any questions?

[tonopah]

On 10/18/2014 11:35 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
> Now that it's become clear that

[Topaz]

[Don Kelly]

I rely more on the structural engineers who examined this situation,
along with other real evidence- rather than conspiracy theorists who
have no understanding of what can and did happen. The pancaking of the
towers has been clearly explained without a stupid conspiracy theory.
Do you send your ideas to news sites dealing with the appropriate
engineering -(electrical engineering is not one- it has its own share of
Kooks).

--
Don Kelly
remove the cross to reply

[Texas Cable Guy]

What does this thread have to do with electricity?

[Governor Swill]

Don Kelly <dh...@shaw.ca> wrote:

>> The sudden, complete, straight down at near free-fall speed collapse
>> of steel framed WTC building 7, which was not touched by the planes,
>> is the SMOKING GUN of the 9/11 conspiracy.

Bullshit.

Swill

[tonopah]

On 10/20/2014 10:45 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
> Bullshit.
>
> Swill
> --

[Topaz]

On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:40:52 -0700, Don Kelly <dh...@shaw.ca> wrote:


>I rely more on the structural engineers who examined this situation,
>along with other real evidence- rather than conspiracy theorists who
>have no understanding of what can and did happen. The pancaking of the
>towers has been clearly explained without a stupid conspiracy theory.
>Do you send your ideas to news sites dealing with the appropriate
>engineering -(electrical engineering is not one- it has its own share of
>Kooks).

Jews control the news sites. The people you rely on are the
liars. Here is proof:

Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big lies. The
Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler was
in favor of big lies. This was in itself a big lie and proof that
Hitler was right. Here is what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in
context:

"But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity
for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute
responsibility for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had
shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the
catastrophe which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that
hour of complete overthrow and shame. By placing responsibility for
the loss of the world war on the shoulders of Ludendorff they took
away the weapon of moral right from the only adversary dangerous
enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the betrayers of the
Fatherland to justice. All this was inspired by the principle--which
is quite true in itself--that in the big lie there is always a certain
force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always
more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature
than consciously or voluntarily, and thus in the primitive simplicity
of their minds they are more readily fall victims to the big lie than
the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little
matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It
would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and
they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort
truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so
may be brought clearly to their minds, they still doubt and waver and
will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For
the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it
has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in
this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These
people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest
purposes.
"From time immemorial, however, the Jews have known better than
any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited. Is not their
very existence founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a
religious community, whereas in reality they are a race? And what a
race! One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has
branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and
exactly true. He (Schopenhauer) called the Jew 'The Great Master of
Lies'. Those who do not realize the truth of that statement, or do not
wish to believe it, will never be able to lend a hand in helping Truth
to prevail."

[Topaz]

On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:45:05 -0400, Governor Swill
<governo...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Don Kelly <dh...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>
>>> The sudden, complete, straight down at near free-fall speed collapse
>>> of steel framed WTC building 7, which was not touched by the planes,
>>> is the SMOKING GUN of the 9/11 conspiracy.
>
>Bullshit.
>

Your news and TV are the bullshit.

It's easy to prove that the media is a pack of liars. If they
were not liars they would tell people that Hitler believed that the
Jews controlled the media. Why don't they? Here are some quotes from
Mein Kampf:

"The man who is not opposed and vilified and slandered in the Jewish
Press is not a staunch German and not a true National Socialist. The
best rule whereby the sincerity of his convictions, his character and
strength of will, can be measured is by the hostility which his name
arouses among the mortal enemies of our people.

"The followers of the movement, and indeed the whole nation, must be
reminded again and again of the fact that, through the medium of his
newspapers, the Jew is always spreading falsehood and that if he tells
the truth on some occasions it is only for the purpose of masking some
greater deceit, which turns the apparent truth into a deliberate
falsehood. The Jew is the Great Master of Lies. Falsehood and
duplicity are the weapons with which he fights.

"Every calumny and falsehood published by the Jews are tokens of honor
which can be worn by our comrades. He whom they decry most is nearest
to our hearts and he whom they mortally hate is our best friend.

"If a comrade of ours opens a Jewish newspaper in the morning and does
not find himself vilified there, then he has spent yesterday to no
account. For if he had achieved something he would be persecuted,
slandered, derided and abused. Those who effectively combat this
mortal enemy of our people, who is at the same time the enemy of all
Aryan peoples and all culture, can only expect to arouse opposition on
the part of this race and become the object of its slanderous attacks.

"When these truths become part of the flesh and blood, as it were, of
our members, then the movement will be impregnable and invincible."

" Then I began to examine my favorite 'World Press', with that fact
before my mind. "The deeper my soundings went the lesser grew my
respect for that Press which I formerly admired. Its style became
still more repellant and I was forced to reject its ideas as entirely
shallow and superficial. To claim that in the presentation of facts
and views its attitude was impartial seemed to me to contain more
falsehood than truth. The writers were- Jews.

"Thousands of details that I had scarcely noticed before seemed to me
now to deserve attention. I began to grasp and understand things which
I had formerly looked at in a different light."

"Thus another weapon beside that of freemasonry would have to be
secured. This was the Press. The Jew exercised all his skill and
tenacity in getting hold of it. By means of the Press he began
gradually to control public life in its entirety."

[tonopah]

On 10/21/2014 2:43 PM, Topaz wrote:
> Jews control


You seriously need to be capped, now.

[tonopah]

On 10/21/2014 2:47 PM, Topaz wrote:
> Your news and TV are the bullshit.

You exterminable Nazi swine, how long will you continue to suck air?

[tonopah]

On 10/20/2014 3:23 PM, Topaz wrote:
> Time to re-examine your World-view,

I wonder if someone will drop a couple of Bitcoins to see you sanctioned...

[Topaz]

On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:43:23 -0600, tonopah <e...@high.way> wrote:


>You exterminable Nazi swine, how long will you continue to suck air?

You should do the world a favor and flush yourself down a toilet,
worthless Jew turd.

Dr. Joseph Goebbels to his stepson, Harold:

My Dear Herald,

We sit locked in the Fuehrer' shelter in the R.C. fighting for our
lives and honour. I hardly believe that we shall ever see each other
again; therefore, it is likely that these will be the last lines you
will ever receive from me. I expect form you, should you outlive this
war, that you do only that which will honour your mother and father.

Germany will outlive this terrible war, but only if it has examples
upon which to guide its reconstruction. Such an example we want to
give here. Do not let yourself be confused by the uproar that will now
reign throughout the world. The lies will one day break down under
their own weight and the truth will again triumph. The hour will come
when we shall stand pure and undefiled as our aims and beliefs have
always been.

[Topaz]

On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:42:51 -0600, tonopah <e...@high.way> wrote:


>You seriously need to be capped, now.

The Jews control your media and your mind. Figuratively speaking,
you have your head up a Jews aft end!

There was a book in ordinary bookstores called "An Empire of
Their Own". It was a pro-Jewish book but it showed that the Jews ran
Hollywood.

Here are some quotes from a magazine for Jews called "Moment".
It is subtitled "The Jewish magazine for the 90's" These quotes are
from the Aug 1996 edition after the Headline "Jews Run Hollywood - So
What?":

"It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish
power and prominence in popular culture. Any list of the most
influential production executives at each of the major movie studios
will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names."

"the famous Disney organization, which was founded by Walt
Disney, a gentile Midwesterner who allegedly harbored anti-Semetic
attitudes, now features Jewish personnel in nearly all its most
powerful positions."

"When Matsushita took over MCA-Universal, they did nothing to
undermine the unquestioned authority of Universal's legendary - and
all Jewish - management triad of Lew Wasserman, Sid Scheinberg, and
Tom Pollack."

Here is a quote from Steven Spielberg, "film is the greatest weapon
in the world".

Jewish control of the media:
MORTIMER ZUCKERMAN, owner of NY Daily News, US News & World Report and
chair of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish American
Organizations, one of the largest pro-Israel lobbying groups.
LESLIE MOONVES, president of CBS television, great-nephew of David
Ben-Gurion, and co-chair with Norman Ornstein of the Advisory
Committee on Public Interest Obligation of Digital TV Producers,
appointed by Clinton.
JONATHAN MILLER, chair and CEO of AOL division of AOL-Time-Warner
NEIL SHAPIRO, president of NBC News
JEFF GASPIN, Executive Vice-President, Programming, NBC
DAVID WESTIN, president of ABC News
SUMNER REDSTONE, CEO of Viacom, "world's biggest media giant"
(Economist, 11/23/2) owns Viacom cable, CBS and MTVs all over the
world, Blockbuster video rentals and Black Entertainment TV.
MICHAEL EISNER, major owner of Walt Disney, Capitol Cities, ABC.
RUPERT MURDOCH, Owner Fox TV, New York Post, London Times, News of the
World (Jewish mother)
MEL KARMAZIN, president of CBS
DON HEWITT, Exec. Director, 60 Minutes, CBS
JEFF FAGER, Exec. Director, 60 Minutes II. CBS
DAVID POLTRACK, Executive Vice-President, Research and Planning, CBS
SANDY KRUSHOW, Chair, Fox Entertainment
LLOYD BRAUN, Chair, ABC Entertainment
BARRY MEYER, chair, Warner Bros.
SHERRY LANSING. President of Paramount Communications and Chairman of
Paramount Pictures' Motion Picture Group.
HARVEY WEINSTEIN, CEO. Miramax Films.
BRAD SIEGEL., President, Turner Entertainment.
PETER CHERNIN, second in-command at Rupert Murdoch's News. Corp.,
owner of Fox TV
MARTY PERETZ, owner and publisher of the New Republic, which openly
identifies itself as pro-Israel. Al Gore credits Marty with being his
"mentor."
ARTHUR O. SULZBERGER, JR., publisher of the NY Times, the Boston Globe
and other publications.
WILLIAM SAFIRE, syndicated columnist for the NYT.
TOM FRIEDMAN, syndicated columnist for the NYT.
CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER, syndicated columnist for the Washington Post.
Honored by Honest Reporting.com, website monitoring "anti-Israel
media."
RICHARD COHEN, syndicated columnist for the Washington Post
JEFF JACOBY, syndicated columnist for the Boston Globe
NORMAN ORNSTEIN, American Enterprise Inst., regular columnist for USA
Today, news analyst for CBS, and co-chair with Leslie Moonves of the
Advisory Committee on Public Interest Obligation of Digital TV
Producers, appointed by Clinton.
ARIE FLEISCHER, Dubya's press secretary.
STEPHEN EMERSON, every media outlet's first choice as an expert on
domestic terrorism.
DAVID SCHNEIDERMAN, owner of the Village Voice and the New Times
network of "alternative weeklies."
DENNIS LEIBOWITZ, head of Act II Partners, a media hedge fund
KENNETH POLLACK, for CIA analysts, director of Saban Center for Middle
East Policy, writes op-eds in NY Times, New Yorker
BARRY DILLER, chair of USA Interactive, former owner of Universal
Entertainment
KENNETH ROTH, Executive Director of Human Rights Watch
RICHARD LEIBNER, runs the N.S. Bienstock talent agency, which
represents 600 news personalities such as Dan Rather, Dianne Sawyer
and Bill O'Reilly.
TERRY SEMEL, CEO, Yahoo, former chair, Warner Bros.
MARK GOLIN, VP and Creative Director, AOL
WARREN LIEBERFORD, Pres., Warner Bros. Home Video Div. of AOL-
TimeWarner
JEFFREY ZUCKER, President of NBC Entertainment
JACK MYERS, NBC, chief.NYT 5.14.2
SANDY GRUSHOW, chair of Fox Entertainment
GAIL BERMAN, president of Fox Entertainment
STEPHEN SPIELBERG, co-owner of Dreamworks
JEFFREY KATZENBERG, co-owner of Dreamworks
DAVID GEFFEN, co-owner of Dreamworks
LLYOD BRAUN, chair of ABC Entertainment
JORDAN LEVIN, president of Warner Bros. Entertainment
MAX MUTCHNICK, co-executive producer of NBC's "Good Morning Miami"
DAVID KOHAN, co-executive producer of NBC's "Good Morning Miami"
HOWARD STRINGER, chief of Sony Corp. of America
AMY PASCAL, chair of Columbia Pictures
JOEL KLEIN, chair and CEO of Bertelsmann's American operations
ROBERT SILLERMAN, founder of Clear Channel Communications
BRIAN GRADEN, president of MTV entertainment
IVAN SEIDENBERG, CEO of Verizon Communications
WOLF BLITZER, host of CNN's Late Edition
LARRY KING, host of Larry King Live
TED KOPPEL, host of ABC's Nightline
ANDREA KOPPEL, CNN Reporter
PAULA ZAHN, CNN Host
MIKE WALLACE, Host of CBS, 60 Minutes
BARBARA WALTERS, Host, ABC's 20-20
MICHAEL LEDEEN, editor of National Review
BRUCE NUSSBAUM, editorial page editor, Business Week
DONALD GRAHAM, Chair and CEO of Newsweek and Washington Post, son of
CATHERINE GRAHAM MEYER, former owner of the Washington Post
HOWARD FINEMAN, Chief Political Columnist, Newsweek
WILLIAM KRISTOL, Editor, Weekly Standard, Exec. Director
Project for a New American Century (PNAC)
RON ROSENTHAL, Managing Editor, San Francisco Chronicle
PHIL BRONSTEIN, Executive Editor, San Francisco Chronicle,
RON OWENS, Talk Show Host, KGO (ABC-Capitol Cities, San Francisco)
JOHN ROTHMAN, Talk Show Host, KGO (ABC-Capitol Cities, San Francisco)
MICHAEL SAVAGE, Talk Show Host, KFSO (ABC-Capitol Cities, San
Francisco) Syndicated in 100 markets
MICHAEL MEDVED, Talk Show Host, on 124 AM stations
DENNIS PRAGER, Talk Show Host, nationally syndicated from LA. Has
Israeli flag on his home page.
BEN WATTENBERG, Moderator, PBS Think Tank.
ANDREW LACK, president of NBC
DANIEL MENAKER, Executive Director, Harper Collins
DAVID REMNICK, Editor, The New Yorker
NICHOLAS LEHMANN, writer, the New York
HENRICK HERTZBERG, Talk of the Town editor, The New Yorker
SAMUEL NEWHOUSE JR, and DONALD NEWHOUSE own Newhouse Publications,
includes 26 newspapers in 22 cities; the Conde Nast magazine group,
includes The New Yorker; Parade, the Sunday newspaper supplement;
American City Business Journals, business newspapers published in more
than 30 major cities in America; and interests in cable television
programming and cable systems serving 1 million homes.
DONALD NEWHOUSE, chairman of the board of directors, Associated Press.
PETER R KANN, CEO, Wall Street Journal, Barron's
RALPH J. & BRIAN ROBERTS, Owners, Comcast-ATT Cable TV.
LAWRENCE KIRSHBAUM, CEO, AOL-Time Warner Book Group

[Topaz]

The Race Debate

Journalists, says Anthony Milne, are now just high-powered
propagandists who twist facts. Immigration into Britain may now never
be stopped, or even controlled, because the politicians, the only
people who can pass laws on the subject, have lost too much power and
influence. In The New Élites, George Walden maintains that Britain is
now in a Soviet-type grip of professional egalitarians whose power
base lies in commerce, culture and the media. They can now control
virtually all of public life. They are extremely mediocre in their
abilities, and indeed brag about their ordinariness, but behind their
anti-elitist rhetoric lies the old urge to dominate which is as
powerful as that of their aristocratic forebears.

Above all, they remain left-liberal and internationalist. Although
Walden is careful not to mention it, it is clear that inverted
snobbery and their "tolerance of foreigners which is regarded as a
sign of superiority", as he puts it, means that pro-immigrant
sentiment will continue to be peddled by the élites.

As Walden points out, élites have always dominated mass societies, and
there is a large academic literature on the subject. But in the past
there was always a struggle between competing élites with opposing
ideas. Britain's new élites, instead, are virtually totalitarian. No
politicians of any party would now dare to propose openly to withdraw
from the Geneva Refugee Convention, which has outlived its usefulness
and is actually harming this country, because the new élites would
shout them down.

Further, the executive branch, in particular the immigration
authorities, can do nothing to halt immigration unless there is a
change of law initiated by the politicians. Similarly, the lawyers in
the immigration appellate system, which is now a growing and
monolithic money-spinner for many of them, have to tolerate perjury in
court by illegal immigrants - whom they know to be lying - and, having
refused them asylum, still allow them to stay in Britain because they
know that the authorities are simply incapable of removing them in the
numbers required.

Decline in standards
The greatest present danger is the decline in journalistic standards,
which the new élites have brought about. In earlier times, news
reporters were taught not to comment in their copy, to be balanced and
fair-minded. Not any more. The present mix of spin, personally biased
opinion, public relations chat and celebrity gossip - often all
crammed into one article - is now demanded of journalists by their
paymasters. In the process they have resorted to lies and half-lies
because they know they can get away with them if they express
left-liberal opinions. They continually use pejorative adjectives when
it comes to describing the Right - again because it is expected of
them. Indeed they fear for their jobs if they fail in this regard.
They are no longer journalists but Soviet-type propagandists. This is
why the Right is always termed 'extreme', but never the Left.

Journalists' names for parties
Journalists will often describe parties such as the BNP, or Austria's
Freedom Party, as 'anti-immigrant' but will not at the same time say
that the other parties are 'pro-immigrant'. They will increasingly
point to the unpleasant consequences of race riots in Britain, but
will not point to their cause: unbridled immigration. They will
sometimes approve of attempts to remove illegal immigrants, but are
only too ready to publish pictures of weeping immigrant children and
their mothers being forced onto ships and planes against their will,
because their editors demand a more sentimental and 'caring' approach
to news stories.

By using non-neutral language, they print glaring paradoxes. An
article in the national press that describes an immigrant borough as
'vibrant', or one which 'celebrates diversity', will be printed
alongside stories about tribal butchery in Africa or communal murders
in India.

Journalists used also to be warned about using non-sequiturs - stating
facts but drawing incorrect conclusions from them. A classic
non-sequitur says that 'anti-immigration' parties promote 'hate'
because, as most immigrants are coloured, white nationalist parties
must therefore "hate coloured people" everywhere in the world. What is
a legitimate criticism of policy becomes instead a personal attack on
individual black people in Britain. They pretend not to see the
difference between one stance and another.

They write emotively and unthinkingly, and seem fearful and confused.
Any talk of controlling immigration will stir up trouble in immigrant
communities, they maintain. They assume that ethnic minorities
themselves want immigration to continue ad infinitum, so they avoid
publishing criticism of immigration policies for fear of giving
offence - offence, that is, to the ethnic minorities, not the British
host population...

Our increasing multi-racialism will itself become a kind of
self-imposed tyranny, and in the end our institutions will be utterly
unreformable. One of the great ironies of our time is that Eastern
Europe, since the collapse of communism, is now freer than the West.
Today it is in the West that criticism of racial or historical dogma
can end the career of a scholar or politician, and even send him to
prison. By contrast, in Eastern Europe and Russia, now the last
enclaves of free white people, one can find plenty of books about race
or historical revisionism.

The warning is clear: Liberalism could well collapse like communism
did, and as suddenly. To avoid this, the new élites themselves will
have to make a smart move to the Right.

Spearhead Online

[tonopah]

On 10/22/2014 3:02 PM, Topaz wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:43:23 -0600, tonopah <e...@high.way> wrote:
>
>
>> You exterminable Nazi swine, how long will you continue to suck air?
>
> You should do the world a favor

Post your address, let's see how you fare.

[tonopah]

On 10/22/2014 3:04 PM, Topaz wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:42:51 -0600, tonopah <e...@high.way> wrote:
>
>
>> You seriously need to be capped, now.
>
> The Jews

Yeah, someone is really likely to take you out, imo.

[tonopah]

On 10/22/2014 3:06 PM, Topaz wrote:
> The Race Debate


Fuck off nazi swine.

[Topaz]

Jewish Involvement In Communism
By Jayne Gardener

The Encyclopedia Judaica confirms the Jewish involvement in the
Communist movement.
The Encyclopedia Judaica is a multi-volume book, published in
Jerusalem, Israel, by Jews, and according to Amazon.com is "the
premier reference source on Jewish life, history and culture." It is
available for sale online and available for perusal at most large
public libraries, translated into English, of course.
This reference book is quite open about the Jewish role in Communism,
particularly early Communism, and contains a large number of
admissions, for instance:
Under the entry for "Communism": in Volume 5, page 792, the following
appears:"The Communist Movement and ideology played an important part
In Jewish life, particularly in the 1920s, 1930s and during and after
World War II." [1]
On page 793, the same Encyclopedia Judaica states: "Communist trends
became widespread in virtually all Jewish communities. In some
countries, Jews became the leading element in the legal and illegal
Communist Parties.." [2]
On page 793 it reveals that the Communist International actually
instructed Jews to change their names so as "not confirm right-wing
propaganda that presented Communism as an alien, Jewish conspiracy."
[3]
On page 792, the Encyclopedia describes the large role played by Jews
in creating the Soviet Union: "Individual Jews played an important
role in the early stages of Bolshevism and the Soviet Regime" [4]
On page 794 it goes on to list the names of Jews prominent in the
upper command of the Russian Communist party, including: "Maxim
Litvinov, (Later foreign minister of Soviet Russia), Grigori Zinoviev,
Lwev Kamenev, Jacob Sverdlov, Lazar Kaganovich, and Karl Radek,
amongst many others." [5]
It was Trotsky who organized the revolution, and it was also he who
organized a special committee, the Military Revolution Committee, to
plan and prepare the coup which brought the Communists to power.
According to the Encyclopedia Judaica, this committee was "comprised
of five members, three of whom were Jewish." [6]
The Politburo, the ultimate ruling body of Russia immediately after
the Communist Revolution, counted "four Jews amongst its seven
members," according to page 797 of the Jewish Encyclopedia. [7]
(London Jewish Chronicle
April 21,1995
Lenin: Life and Legacy by Dmitri Volkogonov

Lenin was 1/4 Jew. And when the parents died, Lenin and his brother
were adopted by a Jewish family. Lenin's Jewish ancestry was brought
to Stalin's attention by his sister, Anna Ulianova-Yelizarov.)

In March of 1919, Lenin made a statement against anti-Semitism which
was "one of the rare occasions when his voice was put on a phonograph
record to be used in a mass campaign against the counterrevolutionary
incitement against the Jews," [9] according to the Encyclopedia
Judaica, page 798.
One of the first laws passed by the new Soviet Communist government
was to outlaw anti-Semitism (Encyclopedia Judaica, page 798)
continued at
http://tinyurl.com/2rbwsz

[Topaz]

Here is a quote from "The Zionist Factor" by Ivor Benson:

"Money had become progressively the measure of all things, with a
ruling elite drawn less and less from the land and more and more from
the factory and counting house. The nations had, in fact, become
plutocracies, capable of maintaining themselves in power with a public
opinion not sought and consulted as before but -created- as required
by newspapers, patronage and other "rewards in the business world."

Such a conversion of money into public opinion and support was
accomplished in Britain by Rhodes and Milner and their "gold bug"
partners, with a total disregard for all moral considerations. Money
had shown what money could do."

[Topaz]

In his book entitled "My Life and Work," which was published in 1922,
Mr. Ford comments on his "International Jew" series with the following
words:

"Readers of our articles will see at once that we are not actuated by
any kind of prejudice, except it may be a prejudice in favor of the
principles which have made our civilization.

"There had been observed in this country certain streams of influence
which were causing a marked deterioration in our literature,
amusements, and social conduct; business was departing from its
old-time substantial soundness; a general letting-down of standards
were felt everywhere. It was not the robust coarseness of the white
man, the rude indelicacy, say, of Shakespeare's characters,
but a nasty Orientalism which has insidiously affected every channel
of expression - and to such an extent that it was time to challenge
it. The fact that these influences are all traceable to one racial
source is a fact to be reckoned with . . . Our work does not pretend
to say the last word on the Jew in America. It says only the word
which describes his present impress on this country. When that impress
is changed, the report can be changed . . . Our opposition is only to
ideas, false ideas, which are sapping the moral stamina of the people.
These ideas proceed from easily identified sources, they are
promulgated by easily discoverable methods and they are controlled by
mere exposure.

"When people learn to identify the source and nature
of the influence swirling around them, it is sufficient.. Let the
American people once understand that it is not natural degeneracy but
calculated subversion that afflicts us, and they are safe.

"The explanation is the cure. This work was taken up without personal
motives. When it reached a stage where we believed the American people
could grasp the key, we let it rest for the time. Our enemies say that
we began it for revenge and that we laid it down in fear. Time will
show that our critics (the Jews) are merely dealing in evasion
because they dare not tackle the main question."

No mature-minded thinker - in fact, no honest reader, could question
Mr. Ford's logic as summarized above. I agree completely with Mr. Ford
in his expressed convictions that all America and the world needs is
to know the truth 'and the truth shall set us free.'

http://www.nidlink.com/~aryanvic/Intro.htm