Low ATHEIST turnout as 4 HORSEMEN ride
us4...@att.net
less than a half dozen or so replies and last only a day or
two, while at the same time, it is not uncommon that the
threads from we the 4 HORSEMEN frequently have
dozens upon dozens of replies and can go on for weeks on
end.
Why do you think that is?
US4Zion
nature bats_last
For the same reason that a hilariously bad
book, play, or movie prompts a flood of
derision, while a good book, play, or
movie generates little more than quiet
approval.
Yours are the "Plan 9 from Outer Space"
of Usenet postings.
LB's S
SkyEyes
I'd characterize him as the _Attack of the Killer Tomatoes_ of Usenet
postings.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
Father Haskell
>
> - Show quoted text -
The Bambi Meets Godzilla of Usenet postings. Gets
stomped every time.
Father Haskell
The Glen or Glenda meets It Conquered the World
of Usenet Postings.
us4...@att.net
FYI... as an example 4 threads I've been watching over the
last 2 days alone have so far amassed a total of 161
replies. These 4 threads were started by either Loirbaj or
All-Seeing-I (50% of the 4 HORSEMAN).
OTOH most of the atheist threads have only 2 or 3 replies.
US4Zion
Ralph
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!
panam...@hotmail.com
Ask any teacher. It always takes more effort to get the stupid to
understand something than it does to educate the intelligent. You and
your ersatz "collagues" are on the shortest of "short buses".
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/Member, Knights of BAAWA!
us4...@att.net
have 4 replies to my post in less than 10 minutes, which is
more than most atheist threads get in 48 hours.
This proves 2 things beyond dispute....
1) the "poster" has more to do with the replies received
than does the "subject".
2) the "poster" rises in popularity as a result of the
content of his past posts.
Summary: atheist "posters" rarely rise to the status of
popularity.
US4Zion
us4...@att.net
<seqk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Mar 25, 3:57 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
>> I've notice that threads started by atheist usually have
>> less than a half dozen or so replies and last only a day or
>> two, while at the same time, it is not uncommon that the
>> threads from we the 4 HORSEMEN frequently have
>> dozens upon dozens of replies and can go on for weeks on
>> end.
>>
>> Why do you think that is?
>>
>> US4Zion
>
>For the same reason that a hilariously bad
>book, play, or movie prompts a flood of
>derision, while a good book, play, or
>movie generates little more than quiet
>approval.
Wrongo bunga-Beau.
Success in Box Office sales is measured in $$$ which in
turn, is a measure of attendance, which in turn is a measure
of popularity (which rapidly comes about by word of mouth).
Question is, is why are we the 4 HORSEMEN so popular?
Negative or positive reaction is irrelevant.
US4Zion
Bob T.
> Calling all atheists...... this proves my point. I already
> have 4 replies to my post in less than 10 minutes, which is
> more than most atheist threads get in 48 hours.
>
> This proves 2 things beyond dispute....
>
> 1) the "poster" has more to do with the replies received
> than does the "subject".
>
> 2) the "poster" rises in popularity as a result of the
> content of his past posts.
Sure... given that "popularity" in this case means lots of people
pointing at you and laughing.
- Bob T
>
> Summary: atheist "posters" rarely rise to the status of
> popularity.
>
> US4Zion
>
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:20:12 -0700 (PDT), Father Haskell
>
>
>
> <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Mar 25, 7:14 pm, nature bats_last <seqkl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Mar 25, 3:57 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
>
> >> > I've notice that threads started by atheist usually have
> >> > less than a half dozen or so replies and last only a day or
> >> > two, while at the same time, it is not uncommon that the
> >> > threads from we the 4 HORSEMEN frequently have
> >> > dozens upon dozens of replies and can go on for weeks on
> >> > end.
>
> >> > Why do you think that is?
>
> >> > US4Zion
>
> >> For the same reason that a hilariously bad
> >> book, play, or movie prompts a flood of
> >> derision, while a good book, play, or
> >> movie generates little more than quiet
> >> approval.
>
> >> Yours are the "Plan 9 from Outer Space"
> >> of Usenet postings.
>
> >> LB's S
>
> >The Glen or Glenda meets It Conquered the World
> >of Usenet Postings.- Hide quoted text -
Buddythunder
Good comedy sells.
us4...@att.net
It beats anything I've ever seen. Raw PANIC is the best way
to describe it.
Loirbaj and AllSeeing-I (as well as myself) can post a
message and within a matter of mere moments there are more
replies than the average atheist poster receives in a couple
of days.
Here's the deal. Simply put... you guys cannot "preach".
Only the truly authorized by God can "preach" the good news
and the TRUTH.
And this ruffles the feathers of you pagans.
US4Zion
us4...@att.net
Get out from under that rock. It's known as "gone viral" in
modern day cyber space terms.
I think at this point, we the 4 HORSEMEN could probably
start posting vids on YOUTUBE.
US4Zion
nature bats_last
> have 4 replies to my post in less than 10 minutes, which is
> more than most atheist threads get in 48 hours.
>
<>
> This proves 2 things beyond dispute....
..
> 1) the "poster" has more to do with the replies received
> than does the "subject".
..
> 2) the "poster" rises in popularity as a result of the
> content of his past posts.
Quite true. Technically, this is known as
the "Charlie Sheen/Lindsay Lohan Effect".
And when may we expect to see you going
into rehab?
LB's S
>
> Summary: atheist "posters" rarely rise to the status of
> popularity.
>
> US4Zion
>
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:20:12 -0700 (PDT), Father Haskell
>
Bob T.
Similarly, a baseball player doesn't care if they're booing him or
cheering him, as long as they're making noise.
- Bob T
>
> US4Zion- Hide quoted text -
panam...@hotmail.com
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:29:42 -0700 (PDT),
>
>
>
>
>
> "panamfl...@hotmail.com" <panamfl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Mar 25, 6:57 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
> >> I've notice that threads started by atheist usually have
> >> less than a half dozen or so replies and last only a day or
> >> two, while at the same time, it is not uncommon that the
> >> threads from we the 4 HORSEMEN frequently have
> >> dozens upon dozens of replies and can go on for weeks on
> >> end.
>
> >> Why do you think that is?
>
> >Ask any teacher. It always takes more effort to get the stupid to
> >understand something than it does to educate the intelligent. You and
> >your ersatz "collagues" are on the shortest of "short buses".
>
> >-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
> >aa#2015/Member, Knights of BAAWA!
>
> It beats anything I've ever seen. Raw PANIC is the best way
> to describe it.
Why did you decide to reply without actually understanding what I
wrote? Thanks for yet *another* data point supporting my hypothesis.
> Loirbaj and AllSeeing-I (as well as myself) can post a
> message and within a matter of mere moments there are more
> replies than the average atheist poster receives in a couple
> of days.
Normal human compassion. We're trying to cure your stupidity.
> Here's the deal. Simply put... you guys cannot "preach".
And have no need to. Thanks for showing that you're just another idiot
with no concept of what atheism actually *is*.
> Only the truly authorized by God can "preach" the good news
> and the TRUTH.
Floyd's corollary to Poe's Law: Anyone who spells "truth" in all
capital letters is either a satirist..or an idiot.
> And this ruffles the feathers of you pagans.
I ain't no pagan, you dumb fuck. I'm an atheist. Their shit is just as
flushable as your own.
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain
Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
Father Haskell
>
> - Show quoted text -
If you've actually *seen* Glen or Glenda, you'd
slit your wrists.
Conan the bacterium
<>
Oh, you should, you should. Absolutely.
Please do.
conan
>
> US4Zion
Budikka666
> I've notice that threads started by atheist usually have
> less than a half dozen or so replies and last only a day or
> two, while at the same time, it is not uncommon that the
> threads from we the 4 HORSEMEN frequently have
> dozens upon dozens of replies and can go on for weeks on
> end.
When you can support that claim, it won't stink like you just pulled
it right out of your dumb ass, will it now? Four horsemen? Four
Horse's Asses more like lol! But just for fun, let me kick your dumb
ass some more and pretend you're not a LYING piece of trash just for
the sake of argument.
> Why do you think that is?
It's because you're too stupid to learn from one simple explanation;
we have to keep pounding your dumb ass with endless facts, references
and counter-argument, and you inevitably prove yourselves ***STILL***
too stupid to grasp it. Then you RUN away and post the same refuted
and discredited claim a week or two later.
When an atheist posts something, as I did with the SIX HUNDRED AND
SIXTY SIX disproofs of creation, the creationists are too cowardly or
vacuous to mount a refutation. That's why those threads are short.
That clarify it for you, jackass?
Budikka
us4...@att.net
>On Mar 25, 7:51 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:29:42 -0700 (PDT),
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "panamfl...@hotmail.com" <panamfl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Mar 25, 6:57 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
>> >> I've notice that threads started by atheist usually have
>> >> less than a half dozen or so replies and last only a day or
>> >> two, while at the same time, it is not uncommon that the
>> >> threads from we the 4 HORSEMEN frequently have
>> >> dozens upon dozens of replies and can go on for weeks on
>> >> end.
>>
>> >> Why do you think that is?
>>
>> >Ask any teacher. It always takes more effort to get the stupid to
>> >understand something than it does to educate the intelligent. You and
>> >your ersatz "collagues" are on the shortest of "short buses".
>>
>> >-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
>> >aa#2015/Member, Knights of BAAWA!
>>
>> It beats anything I've ever seen. Raw PANIC is the best way
>> to describe it.
>
>Why did you decide to reply without actually understanding what I
>wrote?
I have profiled you.
US4Zion
us4...@att.net
So far it's about 20 replies in less than 1 hour (which is
more than 10 of the average atheist posters receive in a
day).
But please... don't slit your wrists. That would be
detrimental to my ratings.
US4Zion
us4...@att.net
We are talking about HEAVEN and HELL and your eternal
destiny. But go ahead and start your own thread about
whether or not Barry Bonds was on steroids.
And yes thanks. You have made my point in a sideways sort of
fashion.
Now all I need is for some ELLEN fan to come in here and
blast me for not accepting LESBIANISM as a normal human
behavior.
US4Zion
us4...@att.net
<seqk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Mar 25, 4:40 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
>> Calling all atheists...... this proves my point. I already
>> have 4 replies to my post in less than 10 minutes, which is
>> more than most atheist threads get in 48 hours.
>>
>
><>
>
>> This proves 2 things beyond dispute....
>..
>> 1) the "poster" has more to do with the replies received
>> than does the "subject".
>..
>> 2) the "poster" rises in popularity as a result of the
>> content of his past posts.
>
>Quite true. Technically, this is known as
>the "Charlie Sheen/Lindsay Lohan Effect".
Not true. This is known as the "Biblical effect". As you
know, the Holy Writ is the #1 all time best seller.
as the 4 HORSEMEN ride on...
US4Zion
us4...@att.net
<budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>On Mar 25, 5:57 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
>> I've notice that threads started by atheist usually have
>> less than a half dozen or so replies and last only a day or
>> two, while at the same time, it is not uncommon that the
>> threads from we the 4 HORSEMEN frequently have
>> dozens upon dozens of replies and can go on for weeks on
>> end.
>
>When you can support that claim, it won't stink like you just pulled
>it right out of your dumb ass, will it now? Four horsemen? Four
>Horse's Asses more like lol! But just for fun, let me kick your dumb
>ass some more and pretend you're not a LYING piece of trash just for
>the sake of argument.
If you want to gain notoriety I suggest that you start by
participating in one of the threads of we, the FOUR
HORSEMEN.
Otherwise and as history has shown, your threads will not
get that much attention.
US4Zion
Conan the bacterium
Gee, I have no idea why a post titled
"I don't believe in God" shouldn't generate
thousands of responses in a group called
`alt.atheism'.
Maybe for the same reason that saying
"I like watching sports" doesn't turn into
a six-hour discussion in a sports bar?
Incidentally, the responses following
posts due to our pet Krishna, "Jahnu",
dwarf the responses generated by yours.
May you should consider Hinduism.
conan
>
> US4Zion
Conan the bacterium
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:29:42 -0700 (PDT),
>
>
>
> "panamfl...@hotmail.com" <panamfl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Mar 25, 6:57 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
> >> I've notice that threads started by atheist usually have
> >> less than a half dozen or so replies and last only a day or
> >> two, while at the same time, it is not uncommon that the
> >> threads from we the 4 HORSEMEN frequently have
> >> dozens upon dozens of replies and can go on for weeks on
> >> end.
>
> >> Why do you think that is?
>
> >Ask any teacher. It always takes more effort to get the stupid to
> >understand something than it does to educate the intelligent. You and
> >your ersatz "collagues" are on the shortest of "short buses".
>
> >-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
> >aa#2015/Member, Knights of BAAWA!
>
> It beats anything I've ever seen. Raw PANIC is the best way
> to describe it.
>
> Loirbaj and AllSeeing-I (as well as myself) can post a
> message and within a matter of mere moments there are more
> replies than the average atheist poster receives in a couple
> of days.
>
<>
> Here's the deal. Simply put... you guys cannot "preach".
Ah, but Marjoe could preach. Man, could Marjoe
ever preach!
We all know how that turned out...
conan
panam...@hotmail.com
You haven't been here for very long, have you? Budikka's threads
attempting to explain the fact of evolution to morons who deny it are
often the flypaper that attracts you fucking imbiciles to alt.atheism
in the first place.
us4...@att.net
I have seriously pondered "why only 4 HORSEMEN"? Why not 7
Horsemen? Or 12 Horsemen? (Especially considering that the
position of the 4th Horsemen is somewhat in a state of
flux).
"Hinduism" is completely out of the question. Those guys
have upwards of 3,000 gods.
Fact of the matter is is that only 1 true HORSEMAN is
without doubt... overkill here in these NG's among you
pantheistic pagans.
It really is as simple as that. Simplicity is the key and I
have all confidence that if need be, I alone could take on
all you pagans without any problems.
Here is where your atheistic lies (and pandering to Hindu's
who have up to 3,000 mini-gods fail)...
2Co 11:3 "But I fear, lest by any means, as the
serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds
should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ."
2Co 11:4 "For if he that cometh preacheth another
Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another
spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which
ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him."
Think about it. If there were 7 or 12 HORSEMEN here this
would no longer be alt. atheism.
US4Zion
panam...@hotmail.com
> >On Mar 25, 7:51 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
> >> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:29:42 -0700 (PDT),
>
> >> "panamfl...@hotmail.com" <panamfl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Mar 25, 6:57 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
> >> >> I've notice that threads started by atheist usually have
> >> >> less than a half dozen or so replies and last only a day or
> >> >> two, while at the same time, it is not uncommon that the
> >> >> threads from we the 4 HORSEMEN frequently have
> >> >> dozens upon dozens of replies and can go on for weeks on
> >> >> end.
>
> >> >> Why do you think that is?
>
> >> >Ask any teacher. It always takes more effort to get the stupid to
> >> >understand something than it does to educate the intelligent. You and
> >> >your ersatz "collagues" are on the shortest of "short buses".
>
> >> >-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
> >> >aa#2015/Member, Knights of BAAWA!
>
> >> It beats anything I've ever seen. Raw PANIC is the best way
> >> to describe it.
>
> >Why did you decide to reply without actually understanding what I
> >wrote?
>
> I have profiled you.
I'm afraid that you'll have to explain to me what that means. Hey, I
took a couple of semesters of "Idiot" in college, but I didn't retain
it, since I didn't use it very often. Honestly, I should have taken
the Spanish language courses instead.
bob
>I've notice that threads started by atheist usually have
>less than a half dozen or so replies and last only a day or
>two, while at the same time, it is not uncommon that the
>threads from we the 4 HORSEMEN frequently have
>dozens upon dozens of replies and can go on for weeks on
>end.
>
>Why do you think that is?
because all normal people like to poke fun at the monkeys in the
cage.
>
>US4Zion
us4...@att.net
>You haven't been here for very long, have you? Budikka's threads
>attempting to explain the fact of evolution to morons who deny it are
>often the flypaper that attracts you fucking imbiciles to alt.atheism
>in the first place.
>
>-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
>aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
Stay tuned. Let's see if Budikka actually backs up what he
is preaching with actual brain cell count studies, or
whether or not he is merely trying to attract an audience.
US4Zion
ps. Don't hold your breath. Atheist threads have been proven
to peter out rather quickly.
us4...@att.net
US4Zion
Ps. you obviously have a problem concentrating on the
subject at hand.
Bob T.
You might as well be talking about GONDOR and MORDOR.
> But go ahead and start your own thread about whether or not Barry Bonds was on steroids.
He was.
>
> And yes thanks. You have made my point in a sideways sort of fashion.
>
> Now all I need is for some ELLEN fan to come in here and
> blast me for not accepting LESBIANISM as a normal human behavior.
You're quite the well-rounded jackass, aren't you?
us4...@att.net
Wrong nutjob. There is nothing which I "have" to do.
I only wish you you could enjoy the God given freedoms of
the average believer.
US4Zion
us4...@att.net
wrote:
You are the monkey in the cage. As are all atheists who
think they've evolved from monkeys.
It's no great mystery that evolutionists are not very bright
as evidenced here by your inability to curse your
adversaries without cursing yourself in the process.
US4Zion
Father Haskell
Whatever.
us4...@att.net
<b...@synapse-cs.com> wrote:
Dufus. Get a grip.
I'm signing off now in order to go eat supper. So far there
are 30+ replies here within 2 hours of my original post...
(which dwarfs the # of replies from 10 nominal atheist
thread replies for a week).
Loirbaj, AllSeeing-I along with myself have for all
practical purposes... taken over here.
Just wait 'till Michael, the 4th HORSEMAN digs in his spurs.
US4Zion
Conan the bacterium
<>
Well, I must admit you've caused us to lower our
guard by pretending to be such a ditz.
In fact, you've cleverly made yourself the
veritable type-specimen for:
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ObfuscatingStupidity
You've got us all completely fooled.
conan
Father Haskell
>
> - Show quoted text -
Is the leather store open that late?
Conan the bacterium
<> { fun stuff un-snipped }
..
> >> Here's the deal. Simply put... you guys cannot "preach".
..
> >Ah, but Marjoe could preach. Man, could Marjoe
> >ever preach!
..
> I've notice that threads started by atheist usually have
> less than a half dozen or so replies and last only a day or
> two, while at the same time, it is not uncommon that the
> threads from we the 4 HORSEMEN frequently have
> dozens upon dozens of replies and can go on for weeks on
> end.
>
> Why do you think that is?
>
> US4Zion
..
> Ps. you obviously have a problem concentrating on the
> subject at hand.
p.s: you must be around 10 cm tall, given the amount
of material that <WHOOOSH>'s right over your head.
conan
Conan the bacterium
<>
Well, there you go then...you're outvoted 3000 to
2 (yes, the devil *is* a god in your mythical pantheon)
conan
panam...@hotmail.com
> >You haven't been here for very long, have you? Budikka's threads
> >attempting to explain the fact of evolution to morons who deny it are
> >often the flypaper that attracts you fucking imbiciles to alt.atheism
> >in the first place.
>
> >-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
> >aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
>
> Stay tuned.
Why? With this post, you've proven that I was absolutely correct when
addressing your ignorance, your avoidance, and your complete idiocy.
For all of your delusions of grandeur, you've done nothing but prove
that people dumb enough to "believe" ancient superstitions are the
wellspring of idiocy in modern societies.
> Let's see if Budikka actually backs up what he
> is preaching with actual brain cell count studies,
Go fuck your sister again, redneck. It would be a *much* better use of
your time than continuing to post your ignorance into alt.atheism.
Your previous behavior here should be enough to show any impartial
observer that you have no fucking clue about *how* to read an article
in a scientific journal.
> or
> whether or not he is merely trying to attract an audience.
>
> US4Zion
>
> ps. Don't hold your breath. Atheist threads have been proven
> to peter out rather quickly.
Ad Populum fallacy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum
Wikipedia's article may not be the *best* explanation of the error
you've made..but it might be the one that's been "dumbed down" enough
for a moron like you to understand.
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
panam...@hotmail.com
No, in this case..I honestly think I've found the *right* nutjob to
ridicule. Just in case you're too fucking stupid to understand, that
means you're the *best* nutjob in alt.atheism at the moment.
>There is nothing which I "have" to do.
So you're comfortable with not being able to express the ideas you're
attempting to defend, or your colloquial terms for those (alleged)
ideas?
> I only wish you you could enjoy the God given freedoms of
> the average believer.
I only wish you could finally understand that to someone who doesn't
share your superstition, a comment like that doesn't do anything but
make you look like a much larger moron than you actually might be.
John Baker
>On Mar 25, 7:14 pm, nature bats_last <seqkl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 25, 3:57 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
>>
>> > I've notice that threads started by atheist usually have
>> > less than a half dozen or so replies and last only a day or
>> > two, while at the same time, it is not uncommon that the
>> > threads from we the 4 HORSEMEN frequently have
>> > dozens upon dozens of replies and can go on for weeks on
>> > end.
>>
>> > Why do you think that is?
>>
>> > US4Zion
>>
>> For the same reason that a hilariously bad
>> book, play, or movie prompts a flood of
>> derision, while a good book, play, or
>> movie generates little more than quiet
>> approval.
>>
>> Yours are the "Plan 9 from Outer Space"
>> of Usenet postings.
>>
>> LB's S
>
>The Glen or Glenda meets It Conquered the World
>of Usenet Postings.
The Troll 2 of Usenet postings.
John Baker
Yep. He became a moderately successful 'B' movie actor and retired
with a fair chunk of change in the bank. And he also became quite
active in debunking the bullshit he used to peddle. <G>
us4...@att.net
bacterium <deinococcus...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Well, I must admit you've caused us to lower our
>guard by pretending to be such a ditz.
Us? Who is "us"?
You're not claiming to be the spokesman for all faggots and
atheists worldwide are you?
US4Zion
us4...@att.net
Are you one of those transgender wackos?
Us4Zion
us4...@att.net
Read 'em and weep. Low atheist and GAYFER turnout is your
problem.
Heck, I've yet to see a single gayfer come out of the closet
yet.
Are you a homosexual? Do you support homosexual behavior or
are you just another one of the 2% minority atheist cult?
Whatever. You cannot preach. That is obvious.
Are you GAY.... yes or no?
US4Zion
us4...@att.net
>Go fuck your sister again, redneck.
Thanks. Now it should be clear as to why the posts of we the
HORSEMEN are so much more popular than those of you the
typical UNION THUG type pagans.
keep up the good work,
US4Zion
Irreverend Dave
c61eb2...@r19g2000prm.googlegroups.com:
> On Mar 25, 4:14 pm, nature bats_last <seqkl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 25, 3:57 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
>>
>> > I've notice that threads started by atheist usually have
>> > less than a half dozen or so replies and last only a day or
>> > two, while at the same time, it is not uncommon that the
>> > threads from we the 4 HORSEMEN frequently have
>> > dozens upon dozens of replies and can go on for weeks on
>> > end.
>>
>> > Why do you think that is?
>>
>> > US4Zion
>>
>> For the same reason that a hilariously bad
>> book, play, or movie prompts a flood of
>> derision, while a good book, play, or
>> movie generates little more than quiet
>> approval.
>>
>> Yours are the "Plan 9 from Outer Space"
>> of Usenet postings.
>
> I'd characterize him as the _Attack of the Killer Tomatoes_ of Usenet
> postings.
>
I was thinking "The Blob" of Usenet postings, but that would probably be
Loibaj <-> Jabriol.
--
Religion is dangerous, because it allows human beings, who don't have all
the answers, to think that they do. - Bill Maher
Irreverend Dave
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:59:54 -0700 (PDT), nature bats_last
> <seqk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mar 25, 4:40 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
>>> Calling all atheists...... this proves my point. I already
>>> have 4 replies to my post in less than 10 minutes, which is
>>> more than most atheist threads get in 48 hours.
>>>
>>
>><>
>>
>>> This proves 2 things beyond dispute....
>>..
>>> 1) the "poster" has more to do with the replies received
>>> than does the "subject".
>>..
>>> 2) the "poster" rises in popularity as a result of the
>>> content of his past posts.
>>
>>Quite true. Technically, this is known as
>>the "Charlie Sheen/Lindsay Lohan Effect".
>
> Not true. This is known as the "Biblical effect". As you
> know, the Holy Writ is the #1 all time best seller.
>
Proving that there really is no accounting for taste.
bob
>On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:06:36 -0400, bob <wf...@comcast.net>
>wrote:
>>
>>
>>because all normal people like to poke fun at the monkeys in the
>>cage.
>
>You are the monkey in the cage. As are all atheists who
>think they've evolved from monkeys.
uh no. we didnt evolve from monkeys
your view of science is conditioned by your addiction to comic books
about religion
us4...@att.net
I have decided to let you post for another 48 hours.
Make the best of it.
Us4Zion
us4...@att.net
>No, in this case..I honestly think I've found the *right* nutjob to
>ridicule. Just in case you're too fucking stupid to understand, that
>means you're the *best* nutjob in alt.atheism at the moment.
Dear buttsuck,
You have inadvertently and unknowingly proven my point.
We, the 4 HORSEMEN are having our way here as seen by the
popularity of all the threads that we start.
thank you for your participation.
I would like to know just for the record however, whether or
not you are a normal atheist or are just another GAY who is
still hiding in the closet.
US4Zion
Father Haskell
>
> - Show quoted text -
Which one of you Four Furries gets to wear the
horse costume?
David Canzi
<us4...@att.net> wrote:
>I've notice that threads started by atheist usually have
>less than a half dozen or so replies and last only a day or
>two, while at the same time, it is not uncommon that the
>threads from we the 4 HORSEMEN frequently have
>dozens upon dozens of replies and can go on for weeks on
>end.
>
>Why do you think that is?
People rush to correct what's wrong, but accept what's right
quietly.
The rush to correct what's wrong is reliable enough that you
can use it for propagation testing on USENET. An article
containing statements that are obviously wrong functions as a
USENET Broadcast Ping.
Maybe that's what posters who are seriously and chronically wrong
are really up to.
--
David Canzi | Life is too short to point out every mistake. |
Olrik
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:06:42 -0700 (PDT), Father Haskell
> <father...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mar 25, 7:40 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
>>> Calling all atheists...... this proves my point. I already
>>> have 4 replies to my post in less than 10 minutes, which is
>>> more than most atheist threads get in 48 hours.
>>>
>>> This proves 2 things beyond dispute....
>>>
>>> than does the "subject".
>>>
>>> content of his past posts.
>>>
>>> popularity.
>>>
>>> US4Zion
>>>
>>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:20:12 -0700 (PDT), Father Haskell
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mar 25, 7:14 pm, nature bats_last<seqkl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Mar 25, 3:57 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> I've notice that threads started by atheist usually have
>>>>>> less than a half dozen or so replies and last only a day or
>>>>>> two, while at the same time, it is not uncommon that the
>>>>>> threads from we the 4 HORSEMEN frequently have
>>>>>> dozens upon dozens of replies and can go on for weeks on
>>>>>> end.
>>>
>>>>>> Why do you think that is?
>>>
>>>
>>>>> For the same reason that a hilariously bad
>>>>> book, play, or movie prompts a flood of
>>>>> derision, while a good book, play, or
>>>>> movie generates little more than quiet
>>>>> approval.
>>>
>>>>> of Usenet postings.
>>>
>>>>> LB's S
>>>
>>>> The Glen or Glenda meets It Conquered the World
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> slit your wrists.
>
> So far it's about 20 replies in less than 1 hour (which is
> more than 10 of the average atheist posters receive in a
> day).
>
> But please... don't slit your wrists. That would be
The higher your "ratings", the higher our mockery.
You're just a popular punching bag, creep. Get over it, bend your knees
and implore your "god" idol to put you out of your misery.
Olrik
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:50:50 -0700 (PDT), Buddythunder
> <davida...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mar 26, 12:40 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
>>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:14:35 -0700 (PDT), nature bats_last
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <seqkl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mar 25, 3:57 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
>>>>> I've notice that threads started by atheist usually have
>>>>> less than a half dozen or so replies and last only a day or
>>>>> two, while at the same time, it is not uncommon that the
>>>>> threads from we the 4 HORSEMEN frequently have
>>>>> dozens upon dozens of replies and can go on for weeks on
>>>>> end.
>>>
>>>>> Why do you think that is?
>>>
>>>>> US4Zion
>>>
>>>> For the same reason that a hilariously bad
>>>> book, play, or movie prompts a flood of
>>>> derision, while a good book, play, or
>>>> movie generates little more than quiet
>>>> approval.
>>>
>>>
>>> Success in Box Office sales is measured in $$$ which in
>>> turn, is a measure of attendance, which in turn is a measure
>>> of popularity (which rapidly comes about by word of mouth).
>>>
>>> Question is, is why are we the 4 HORSEMEN so popular?
>>>
>>> Negative or positive reaction is irrelevant.
>>>
>>
>> Good comedy sells.
>
> Get out from under that rock. It's known as "gone viral" in
> modern day cyber space terms.
>
> I think at this point, we the 4 HORSEMEN could probably
> start posting vids on YOUTUBE.
But you won't, because you're just a usenet "dime a dozen" idiot.
Np go play the banjo elsewhere, inbred.
> US4Zion
James Dale Guckert
> Success in Box Office sales is measured in $$$
Replying to inane posts is free.
--
JDG
James Dale Guckert
James Dale Guckert
> If you want to gain notoriety
Apparently that's *your* goal.
--
JDG
James Dale Guckert
> Now it should be clear as to why the posts of we the
> HORSEMEN are so much more popular than those of you the
> typical UNION THUG type pagans.
Wherein Pony-Boy here demonstrates that either he is still in high
school, or he never left the whole "cool-kid" clique mentality behind.
Wherein Pony-Boy shows that he never learned that calling oneself
popular is usually proof that one is not popular.
Wherein he reveals that he sees this newsgroup as some sort of social
hierarchy rather than a place to exchange ideas.
Wherein he reveals that he values quantity over character.
Wherein he declares victory when an object moves upon being poked with a
stick.
--
JDG
Gregory A Greenman
us4...@att.net says...
>
> Now all I need is for some ELLEN fan to come in here and
> blast me for not accepting LESBIANISM as a normal human
> behavior.
Why would you have a problem with lesbians? According to the
bible, they're the only ones that engage in god-approved sex.
In another post, you cite this verse:
> "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is
> abomination" (Leviticus 18:22)
If it's against god's will for anyone to sleep with a man, then
obviously two women sleeping together is all that's left. So why
are you opposed to that which your god approves?
--
Greg
http://www.spencerbooksellers.com
newsguy -at- spencersoft -dot- com
us4...@att.net
wrote:
>uh no. we didnt evolve from monkeys
Uh right. We didn't "evolve" from anything.
We were created.
All we need to do is seek the kingdom of God and avoid
the latter day Sodomite culture.
As it is written:
"But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his
righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto
you." - Jesus
Unlike wiccanism, idolatry and other pagan practices which
have been extinguished for the most part, the Sodomitic
cultural mindset has been foretold as being the very last
foothold of paganism....
"But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire
and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all. Even thus
shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed." -
Jesus
In another thread I have called out the SODOMITES.
stay tuned,
US4Zion
us4...@att.net
<revere...@ministerpants.com> wrote:
>>us4...@att.net wrote in news:olbqo6hvr2ensgb3v...@4ax.com:
>> Not true. This is known as the "Biblical effect". As you
>> know, the Holy Writ is the #1 all time best seller.
>>
>
>Proving that there really is no accounting for taste.
Proving that the "godless" are in the minority and have no
hope of producing a #1 all time best selling book.
We the 4 HORSEMEN ride unencumbered, basically.
US4Zion
us4...@att.net
>I only wish you could finally understand that to someone who doesn't
>share your superstition, a comment like that doesn't do anything but
>make you look like a much larger moron than you actually might be.
>
>-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
Wish away. Consider however why it is that we the 4 HORSEMEN
have so easily dominated the boards here.
Your mistake is in your presumption of "superstition".
If anything, I have singelhandedly shown that it is you guys
who are subject to superstition.
Otherwise you pagans and faggots would be able to start
threads here which would captivate the audience. But you
can't.
All you can do is to hope to hi-jack the threads we the
HORSEMEN start.
Furthermore, it is obvious that the faggots here are
cowards. So far, not a single GAYFER has had enough courage
to come out of the closet and say "I am gay".
We, the FOUR HORSEMEN ride,
US4Zion
thomas p.
news:0c6c74bb-bc88-4682...@o15g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 25, 3:57 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
> I've notice that threads started by atheist usually have
> less than a half dozen or so replies and last only a day or
> two, while at the same time, it is not uncommon that the
> threads from we the 4 HORSEMEN frequently have
> dozens upon dozens of replies and can go on for weeks on
> end.
>
> Why do you think that is?
>
> US4Zion
For the same reason that a hilariously bad
book, play, or movie prompts a flood of
derision, while a good book, play, or
movie generates little more than quiet
approval.
Yours are the "Plan 9 from Outer Space"
of Usenet postings.
LB's S
thomas p wrote:
I resent you insulting the creative talents of Ed Wood by comparing him with
these boobies.
us4...@att.net
I really wish that you would repent to God and not be sent
to HELL.
What do you really wish for?
US4Zion
us4...@att.net
dmc...@remulak.uwaterloo.ca (David Canzi) wrote:
>In article <nu6qo6l2ha6fa5j7a...@4ax.com>,
> <us4...@att.net> wrote:
>>I've notice that threads started by atheist usually have
>>less than a half dozen or so replies and last only a day or
>>two, while at the same time, it is not uncommon that the
>>threads from we the 4 HORSEMEN frequently have
>>dozens upon dozens of replies and can go on for weeks on
>>end.
>>
>>Why do you think that is?
>
>People rush to correct what's wrong, but accept what's right
>quietly.
Godless atheists quietly accept what is right?
>The rush to correct what's wrong is reliable enough that you
>can use it for propagation testing on USENET. An article
>containing statements that are obviously wrong functions as a
>USENET Broadcast Ping.
Faggots who endorse gay marriage obviously will all rush to
correct anyone who quotes LEVITICAL LAW and the truth that
homosexual behavior is an abomination before God.
We the 4 HORSEMEN are the ultimate pingers of truth.
Thus the high turnout in all of our threads and the low
turnout in the pagan threads.
US4Zion
us4...@att.net
<olri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Np go play the banjo elsewhere, inbred.
Are yo gay or not?
US4Zion
us4...@att.net
<olri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>The higher your "ratings", the higher our mockery.
Spot on dummy.
A Jewish guy rose from the dead 2,000 years ago. Your higher
mockery has proven to be futile.
>You're just a popular punching bag, creep. Get over it, bend your knees
>and implore your "god" idol to put you out of your misery.
Your mockery has for over 2,000 years.... been proven to be
quite ineffectual.
Buy some diapers. Sooner or later, the writings of we the 4
HORSEMEN will make you pee in your pants. In an emergency
situation you might consider grabbing one of your ole lady's
sanitary devices..................
US4Zion
us4...@att.net
True.
Rejecting God is a free ticket to HELL.
US4Zion
us4...@att.net
<s...@sig.below> wrote:
>In article <34cqo65576qkbjs9h...@4ax.com>,
>us4...@att.net says...
>>
>> Now all I need is for some ELLEN fan to come in here and
>> blast me for not accepting LESBIANISM as a normal human
>> behavior.
>
>Why would you have a problem with lesbians?
Great. Swell. Some ELLEN fan has appeared.
Lookie here. I've called out GAYS in another thread.
This thread proves that HORSMEN threads are 10 times more
popular than ATHEIST threads.
I've called out the GAYS in the other thread to show that
GAYS are actually cowards who are trying to hide under the
cover of ATHEISM.
Are you a bisexual carpet muncher? Yes or no.
US4Zion
Wombat
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:29:42 -0700 (PDT),
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "panamfl...@hotmail.com" <panamfl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Mar 25, 6:57 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
> >> I've notice that threads started by atheist usually have
> >> less than a half dozen or so replies and last only a day or
> >> two, while at the same time, it is not uncommon that the
> >> threads from we the 4 HORSEMEN frequently have
> >> dozens upon dozens of replies and can go on for weeks on
> >> end.
>
> >> Why do you think that is?
>
> >understand something than it does to educate the intelligent. You and
> >your ersatz "collagues" are on the shortest of "short buses".
>
> >-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
> >aa#2015/Member, Knights of BAAWA!
>
> It beats anything I've ever seen. Raw PANIC is the best way
> to describe it.
>
> Loirbaj and AllSeeing-I (as well as myself) can post a
> message and within a matter of mere moments there are more
> replies than the average atheist poster receives in a couple
> of days.
>
> Here's the deal. Simply put... you guys cannot "preach".
>
> Only the truly authorized by God can "preach" the good news
> and the TRUTH.
>
> And this ruffles the feathers of you pagans.
>
> US4Zion
Which of you three is Warren, which Jonathan and which Andrew?
Wombat
Budikka666
> If you want to gain notoriety I suggest that you start by
> participating in one of the threads of we, the FOUR
> HORSEMEN.
You are the four horse's asses as we demonstrate here on a daily
basis.
Now if you actually produced evidence to support your position, you
wouldn't have these endless threads with every atheist on Usenet
roundly kicking your dumb asses every single day. Atheist threads are
short because atheists nail the opposition with supported argument and
the theists RUN AWAY. Got that now moron, because it's really
tiresome having to tell you four clowns the same thing over and over
again only to see that you have no horse sense.
Let me prove it to everyone right here. I guarantee you will RUN AWAY
from this challenge. Creationist Coward-For-Christ™ Chicken Bill®
already ran from it today.
Here's what you're shrinking from like a limp Peter at the Passion:
1. Demonstrate with objective evidence that this deity of yours
exists
2. Demonstrate with objective evidence that this deity of yours is
the only deity there is
3. Demonstrate with objective evidence that this deity of yours
created the universe and life on Earth
4. Demonstrate with objective evidence that this deity of yours is
not a figment of your imagination
Or keep running, you pathetic coward; it's what you do best, after
all.
Is that your clean pair of heels I hear fleeing this challenge as fast
as your clay feet can move them? lol!
Budikka
Loirbaj
> >> Now all I need is for some ELLEN fan to come in here and
> >> blast me for not accepting LESBIANISM as a normal human
> >> behavior.
Speaking of freaks. PanamaFloyd tipped his hand and look,
Several younger friends of mine
all seem to agree that the Corporate Ponzi Scheme
in the US as it exists is headed for an even larger fall
We all laugh We are now the "New Survivalists"
within my own little network of progressive friends
we've largely stopped trying to *educate* the "Marching Morons
Empathy for other humans ends
The value I have to my compadres up at the farm is that I can
repair mechanical devices (tractors, irrigation pumps, and even
Stranger still, the folks are offering me a full share for showing
(previously) gun-hating friends how to choose, clean, and use
firearms. -Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
Evolution's TIN FOIL HAT Brigade
Gregory A Greenman
us4...@att.net says...
>
> On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 00:11:28 -0500, Gregory A Greenman
> <s...@sig.below> wrote:
>
> >In article <34cqo65576qkbjs9h...@4ax.com>,
> >us4...@att.net says...
> >>
> >> Now all I need is for some ELLEN fan to come in here and
> >> blast me for not accepting LESBIANISM as a normal human
> >> behavior.
> >
> >Why would you have a problem with lesbians?
>
> Great. Swell. Some ELLEN fan has appeared.
Hate to disappoint you, but I'm not an Ellen fan.
> Lookie here. I've called out GAYS in another thread.
I know. I quoted from that thread.
> This thread proves that HORSMEN threads are 10 times more
> popular than ATHEIST threads.
You are a bizarre person. Or, are you a Loki troll like Madman?
> I've called out the GAYS in the other thread to show that
> GAYS are actually cowards who are trying to hide under the
> cover of ATHEISM.
Some gay people are atheists, some are not. Regardless of
whether a homosexual is an atheist, what does it mean to "hide
under the cover of ATHEISM"?
> Are you a bisexual carpet muncher? Yes or no.
I am not a lesbian.
But, since you want to know, I'll be more than happy to answer
your extremely rude and personal question right after you answer
the question you snipped:
Loirbaj
> > >> Now all I need is for some ELLEN fan to come in here and
> > >> blast me for not accepting LESBIANISM as a normal human
> > >> behavior.
Mr Budikka / Ian Wood said
> > >Why would you have a problem with lesbians?
> > I've called out the GAYS in the other thread to show that
> > GAYS are actually cowards who are trying to hide under the
> > cover of ATHEISM.
US4Z said
> > Are you a bisexual carpet muncher? Yes or no.
>
> I am not a lesbian.
> But, since you want to know, I'll be more than happy to answer
No, Mr.Budikka. No one "wants to know". And since,
Ian Wood aka Budikka, you are a man, it is impossible
to be a lesbian. The topic of "low turnout" has to do more
with your fraud and dishonesty in posting.
bob
>On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:14:28 -0700 (PDT),
>"panam...@hotmail.com" <panam...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Go fuck your sister again, redneck.
>
>Thanks. Now it should be clear as to why the posts of we the
>HORSEMEN are so much more popular than those of you the
>typical UNION THUG type pagans.
>
>keep up the good work,
>
>US4Zion
>
>
wall street gave us our current economy
but the right wing lunatic creationist
blames it on wall street
bob
>On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 23:29:51 -0400, bob <wf...@comcast.net>
>wrote:
>
>>uh no. we didnt evolve from monkeys
>
>Uh right. We didn't "evolve" from anything.
not what the evidence shows
>
>We were created.
so you guys preached for 2000 years. along with the bizarre idea that
demons caused disease and other supernatural nonsense
all of it wrong. wrong.
>Unlike wiccanism, idolatry and other pagan practices which
>have been extinguished for the most part, the Sodomitic
>cultural mindset has been foretold as being the very last
>foothold of paganism...
you really do have an obsession with gays, dont you?
slavery doesnt bother you. the bloody history of your religion doesnt
concern you
but gays do. interesting
>US4Zion
>
>
>
bob
>Faggots who endorse gay marriage obviously will all rush to
>correct anyone who quotes LEVITICAL LAW and the truth that
>homosexual behavior is an abomination before God
ah levitical law
and, of course, in the book of philemon, when paul sends an escaped
slave back to his master, the creationists think THAT is great. after
all, creationists defend slavery as being bibical while they obsess
over gays.
Mitchell Holman
47c951...@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com:
Perhaps he will take a page from Calvin Ramsey with his
"you would not understand it" and "when you are saved by
Jesus you will know I am right".
PS: He seems to have gotten his butt kicked often enough
here to send him back to his Xian fundie groups.........
Bob LeChevalier
>I've notice that threads started by atheist usually have
>less than a half dozen or so replies and last only a day or
>two,
Nothing wrong with that. Very few topics are worth more than that.
And most people aren't interested in joining your silly "competition",
not seeing any virtue in a long thread in which nothing meaningful is
said.
>while at the same time, it is not uncommon that the
>threads from we the 4 HORSEMEN frequently have
>dozens upon dozens of replies and can go on for weeks on
>end.
>
>Why do you think that is?
Because YOU post dozens and dozens of replies (none of which actually
says anything new, much less meaningful).
For example, this thread at the moment has 80 messages in it according
to my newsreader. You've posted 32 of them, all within the first 8
hours. Thus, you are barely averaging 1.5 responses to each of your
posts.
Hardly evidence of interest.
Voluminous blather is not evidence of virtue.
lojbab
---
Bob LeChevalier - artificial linguist; genealogist
loj...@lojban.org Lojban language www.lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier
>Calling all atheists...... this proves my point.
You have no point.
>I already
>have 4 replies to my post in less than 10 minutes, which is
>more than most atheist threads get in 48 hours.
Good for them.
>This proves 2 things beyond dispute....
>
>1) the "poster" has more to do with the replies received
>than does the "subject".
Probably true.
>2) the "poster" rises in popularity as a result of the
>content of his past posts.
You seem to think that a replies to your posts are a sign of
popularity.
>Summary: atheist "posters" rarely rise to the status of
>popularity.
Probably, they don't care.
I'd rather be right than be popular.
Bob LeChevalier
>On 26 Mar 2011 04:27:53 +0100, Irreverend Dave
><revere...@ministerpants.com> wrote:
>
>>>us4...@att.net wrote in news:olbqo6hvr2ensgb3v...@4ax.com:
>
>>> Not true. This is known as the "Biblical effect". As you
>>> know, the Holy Writ is the #1 all time best seller.
>>>
>>
>>Proving that there really is no accounting for taste.
>
Actually, Christians remain a minority of the world's population. Even
if you add in the Moslems, people of the Book are probably still a
minority.
And of course, among Christians, you fundies are a tiny minority.
Bob LeChevalier
>Here's the deal. Simply put... you guys cannot "preach".
Why would they want to?
You seem to think that preaching is a virtue.
It isn't. Especially on Usenet.
Bob LeChevalier
>Wish away. Consider however why it is that we the 4 HORSEMEN
>have so easily dominated the boards here.
Because you post 10 times as many posts as anybody sane.
Of course, calling what you do "dominating" is a mischaracterization.
>Otherwise you pagans and faggots would be able to start
>threads here which would captivate the audience.
Why would they want to?
lojbab
Irreverend Dave
> us4...@att.net wrote:
>>On 26 Mar 2011 04:27:53 +0100, Irreverend Dave
>><revere...@ministerpants.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>us4...@att.net wrote in
>>>>news:olbqo6hvr2ensgb3v...@4ax.com:
>>
>>>> Not true. This is known as the "Biblical effect". As you
>>>> know, the Holy Writ is the #1 all time best seller.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Proving that there really is no accounting for taste.
>>
>>Proving that the "godless" are in the minority.
>
> Actually, Christians remain a minority of the world's population. Even
> if you add in the Moslems, people of the Book are probably still a
> minority.
That's probably correct if you're talking about "True Christians" and
"True Moslems", without including those who are either too lazy or too
frightened to voice their true convictions (or lack thereof).
>
> And of course, among Christians, you fundies are a tiny minority.
The problem being that for such a tiny group they make more noise than
the rest of Christianity put together.
--
Religion is dangerous, because it allows human beings, who don't have all
the answers, to think that they do. - Bill Maher
Caranx latus
> I've notice that threads started by atheist usually have
> less than a half dozen or so replies and last only a day or
> threads from we the 4 HORSEMEN frequently have
> dozens upon dozens of replies and can go on for weeks on
> end.
>
> Why do you think that is?
People are naturally attracted to disasters.
James Dale Guckert
Nope.
--
JDG
James Dale Guckert
> <Dip...@Yahoo.Invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 3/25/11 6:24 PM, us4...@att.net wrote:
>>> I only wish
>>
>> What do you *really* wish for?
>
> I really wish that you would repent to God and not be sent
> to HELL.
For some reason I don't believe that.
--
JDG
James Dale Guckert
Which one are you, Pony-Boy?
1. Dimwittery,
2. Dishonesty,
3. Trollery, or
4. Immaturity?
--
JDG
Tom McDonald
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:42:13 -0700 (PDT), Father Haskell
> <father...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mar 25, 9:39 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
>>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:19:11 -0700 (PDT), "Bob T."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <b...@synapse-cs.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mar 25, 5:24 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:01:23 -0700 (PDT), "Bob T."
>>>
>>>>> <b...@synapse-cs.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Mar 25, 4:40 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:14:35 -0700 (PDT), nature bats_last
>>>
>>>>>>> <seqkl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mar 25, 3:57 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I've notice that threads started by atheist usually have
>>>>>>>>> less than a half dozen or so replies and last only a day or
>>>>>>>>> two, while at the same time, it is not uncommon that the
>>>>>>>>> threads from we the 4 HORSEMEN frequently have
>>>>>>>>> dozens upon dozens of replies and can go on for weeks on
>>>>>>>>> end.
>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why do you think that is?
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>> For the same reason that a hilariously bad
>>>>>>>> book, play, or movie prompts a flood of
>>>>>>>> derision, while a good book, play, or
>>>>>>>> movie generates little more than quiet
>>>>>>>> approval.
>>>
>>>>>>> Wrongo bunga-Beau.
>>>
>>>>>>> Success in Box Office sales is measured in $$$ which in
>>>>>>> turn, is a measure of attendance, which in turn is a measure
>>>>>>> of popularity (which rapidly comes about by word of mouth).
>>>
>>>>>>> Question is, is why are we the 4 HORSEMEN so popular?
>>>
>>>>>>> Negative or positive reaction is irrelevant.
>>>
>>>>>> Similarly, a baseball player doesn't care if they're booing him or
>>>>>> cheering him, as long as they're making noise.
>>>
>>>>>> - Bob T
>>>
>>>>> We are talking about HEAVEN and HELL and your eternal destiny.
>>>
>>>> You might as well be talking about GONDOR and MORDOR.
>>>
>>> Dufus. Get a grip.
>>>
>>> I'm signing off now in order to go eat supper. So far there
>>> are 30+ replies here within 2 hours of my original post...
>>> (which dwarfs the # of replies from 10 nominal atheist
>>> thread replies for a week).
>>>
>>> Loirbaj, AllSeeing-I along with myself have for all
>>> practical purposes... taken over here.
>>>
>>> Just wait 'till Michael, the 4th HORSEMAN digs in his spurs.
>>>
>>> US4Zion- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> Is the leather store open that late?
>
> Are you one of those transgender wackos?
Are you still trolling the ngs for dates? How's that working out for you?
--
Tom
Tom McDonald
> bacterium<deinococcus...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mar 25, 6:00 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
>>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:38:22 -0700 (PDT), Conan the
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> bacterium<deinococcus0radiodur...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mar 25, 3:57 pm, us4z...@att.net wrote:
>>>>> I've notice that threads started by atheist usually have
>>>>> less than a half dozen or so replies and last only a day or
>>>>> two, while at the same time, it is not uncommon that the
>>>>> threads from we the 4 HORSEMEN frequently have
>>>>> dozens upon dozens of replies and can go on for weeks on
>>>>> end.
>>>
>>>>> Why do you think that is?
>>>
>>>> "I don't believe in God" shouldn't generate
>>>> thousands of responses in a group called
>>>> `alt.atheism'.
>>>
>>>> Maybe for the same reason that saying
>>>> "I like watching sports" doesn't turn into
>>>> a six-hour discussion in a sports bar?
>>>
>>>> Incidentally, the responses following
>>>> posts due to our pet Krishna, "Jahnu",
>>>> dwarf the responses generated by yours.
>>>
>>>> May you should consider Hinduism.
>>>
>>>> conan
>>>
>>> I have seriously pondered "why only 4 HORSEMEN"? Why not 7
>>> Horsemen? Or 12 Horsemen? (Especially considering that the
>>> position of the 4th Horsemen is somewhat in a state of
>>> flux).
>>>
>>
>> <>
>>
>>> "Hinduism" is completely out of the question. Those guys
>>> have upwards of 3,000 gods.
>>
>> Well, there you go then...you're outvoted 3000 to
>> 2 (yes, the devil *is* a god in your mythical pantheon)
>>
>>
>> conan
>
> Read 'em and weep. Low atheist and GAYFER turnout is your
> problem.
>
> Heck, I've yet to see a single gayfer come out of the closet
> yet.
>
> Are you a homosexual? Do you support homosexual behavior or
> are you just another one of the 2% minority atheist cult?
>
> Whatever. You cannot preach. That is obvious.
>
> Are you GAY.... yes or no?
Why are you so interested in other people's sexual behavior? Why not just
break down and go to a gay dating site and find some relief for your obvious
anal itch.
--
Tom
Budikka666
Since you're responding to me under the delusion that I wrote the
response you're attacking here, the only LIAR here is you. Since your
pathological LYING credentials have been repeatedly exposed by me and
many others, it follows that the only clueless moron here is you. You
know nothing at all about me yet here you are declaring certainties
about things of which you know the cube root of diddly squat. Only an
imbecile would do that. Folks, meet LIAR Badge, the most delusional,
the most clueless, the most ignorant, the most vacuous and LYING piece
of trash on Usenet, once again embarrassing himself by blundering
blindly and stupidly into something of which he hasn't even the
faintest acquaintanceship.
Budikka
Irreverend Dave
Is the cube root of diddly squat larger than five-eights of fuck all?
I'm only asking because that's how I would have defined the extent of
Loirbaj's knowledge.
Budikka666
wrote:
I don't have the exact figures on that, but the best estimate I can
get is that both measures are so remarkably close to zero that there
is no practical difference....
Budikka
AllSeeing-I
>
> - Show quoted text -
Jealous of Loribaj?
Doc Smartass
> I've notice that threads started by atheist usually have
> less than a half dozen or so replies and last only a day or
> two, while at the same time, it is not uncommon that the
> threads from we the 4 HORSEMEN frequently have
> dozens upon dozens of replies and can go on for weeks on
> end.
>
> Why do you think that is?
You entertain us, Horseturd. That's what you're here for.
--
Doc Smartass, BAAWA Knight of Aimin' to Misbehave aa # 1939
Kooks! http://kookclearinghouse.blogspot.com/
Books! http://jw-bookblog.blogspot.com/
Teabaggers rant about Obama's birth certificate, but accept an unverifiable
"virgin birth"