Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

+The Rod Speed "Response Sentence" Collection (FWIW)

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Stray Dog

unread,
Jan 24, 2009, 12:36:46 PM1/24/09
to

FYI, FWIW this is a "stamp collection" of highly used
"Rod-Speed-response-sentences."

They, and their use, is quite unique in my experiences on newsgroups and
communication and/or attempted communication between people thought to
have a brain.

Some sentences below are repeated, even many times, because Rod Speed
actually reused the same sentence in the same post as a response to a
different sentence by the original poster.

--------------

Your problem is that you dont have anything viable between your ears to
apply to what you find using google.

That was nothing even remotely resembling anything like selling the
nation's assets to pay off the IMF bailout.

That was nothing even remotely resembling anything like selling the
nation's assets to pay off the IMF bailout.

Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have
never ever had a fucking clue about what actually happens.

Nothing even remotely resembling anything like Reaganomics.

Wrong.

You dont have a fucking clue.

Wrong.

Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have
never ever had a fucking clue about what actually happened.

Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have
never ever had a fucking clue about what actually happened.

Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have
never ever had a fucking clue about what actually happened.

Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have
never ever had a fucking clue about what actually happened.

Nope, you dont have a fucking clue about even the most basic stuff.

Mindlessly silly.

You are just plain wrong.

Pig ignorant lie.

Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have
never ever had a fucking clue about what actually happened.

Nope, you wont be able to find even a single prediction
of the complete implosion of the world financial system.

Like hell it is.

Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have
never ever had a fucking clue about what actually happened.

Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have
never ever had a fucking clue about what actually happened.

Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have
never ever had a fucking clue about what actually happened.

Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have
never ever had a fucking clue about what actually happened.

Wrong, that has been going on for a hell of a lot longer than that.

Only the fools who dont have a fucking clue why they do that.

Not even one predicted the complete implosion of the world financial system.

=================
Here are samples from his response in another post:
-------------------
From rod.sp...@gmail.com Sat Jan 24 13:45:16 2009
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:45:16 +1100
From: Rod Speed <rod.sp...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.econ
Subject: Re: are we ruled by a World Economic Government?

Nope. If we were, we wouldnt have seen the world financial system come within an ace of imploding spectacularly.

Nope.

Wrong.

Like hell they have.

Like hell they do.

Nothing even remotely resembling anything like a treaty.

Doesnt 'rule' anyone.

Like hell they are when those govt can change them at any time.

Wrong, as always. Nothing 'secret court system' about it.

Bare faced pig ignorant lie.

Wrong, as always. And govt can pull out of any trade agreement it likes.

Bare faced pig ignorant lie.

Rod Speed

unread,
Jan 24, 2009, 4:18:09 PM1/24/09
to
Some gutless fuckwit psychopath with pathetic psychotic
delusions about being a dog, desperately cowering behind
Stray Dog desperately attempted to bullshit and lie its way out
of its predicament and fooled absolutely no one at all, as always.

No surprise that it got the bums rush, right out the door, onto its lard arse.

No surprise that its so pathetically bitter and twisted about it.


Blash

unread,
Jan 24, 2009, 4:31:34 PM1/24/09
to
Rod Speed wrote on 1/24/09 4:18 PM:

Thank you for cross-posting this ray of sunshine to
alt.computer.consultants
sci.econ
alt.politics.economics and
misc.invest stocks

Stray Dog

unread,
Jan 24, 2009, 5:35:40 PM1/24/09
to

On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Rod Speed wrote:

> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:18:09 +1100
> From: Rod Speed <rod.sp...@gmail.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.computer.consultants, sci.econ, alt.politics.economics,
> misc.invest.stocks
> Subject: Some gutless fuckwit psychopath with pathetic psychotic delusions

Just like clockwork, very predictable.

For all the rest of you folks, maybe we're doing the world a favor keeping
this guy (Rod Speed) off the streets.

raylopez99

unread,
Jan 24, 2009, 5:39:14 PM1/24/09
to
On Jan 24, 5:35 pm, Stray Dog <sdog2...@sdf.lonestar.org> wrote:
>
> For all the rest of you folks, maybe we're doing the world a favor keeping
> this guy (Rod Speed) off the streets.

He's pretty funny, you have to admit. And you are his comidic foil.
You work together, you two, like longtime comedian George Allen and
his sidekick wife Gracie.

RL

Rod Speed

unread,
Jan 24, 2009, 5:41:55 PM1/24/09
to

Stray Dog

unread,
Jan 24, 2009, 6:01:50 PM1/24/09
to

On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, raylopez99 wrote:

> Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:39:14 -0800 (PST)
> From: raylopez99 <raylo...@gmail.com>


> Newsgroups: alt.computer.consultants, sci.econ, alt.politics.economics,
> misc.invest.stocks

> Subject: Re: Ree: Some gutless fuckwit psychopath with pathetic psychotic
> delusions
>

Hey, that's pretty good. That's about the only way I can deal with the
guy: scoop up his shit and throw it back in his face. Hopefully with
enough imaginative new twists and "come-backs" that someone else besides
me is entertained by "the show".

I remember Allen and Gracie. There were others, too. Jackie Gleason
(playing Ralph Cramden) and his wife Alice (Cramden), for example.
Remember them? Amos & Andy? Goucho Marx (with the duck that came down and
gave $100 if you said the magic word)?

Personally, I'd rather talk about more serious things...but...what the
hell...if you got lemons (or "defects" like Rod Speed) then you make lemon
aide, right?

P.S. Are you enjoying the depression so far? You know we haven't had one
for, what 70 years now. WSJ said today unemployment in Spain is officially
14%.

Rod Speed

unread,
Jan 24, 2009, 7:09:41 PM1/24/09
to
Some gutless fuckwit psychopath with pathetic psychotic

Stray Dog

unread,
Jan 24, 2009, 7:54:03 PM1/24/09
to

On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Rod Speed, the internet's own Rush Limbaugh, wrote:


I, Rod Speed, am a gutless fuckwit psychopath with pathetic psychotic
delusions about being a reasonable person, desperately cowering behind
egotistical and excessive self-importance and desperately bullshiting and
lying my way to victory to fool as many people as possible until the day
that someone authored the "Rod Speed FAQ" (see below).

No surprise that Rod Speed gave himself the bums rush, right off those
original newsgroups, onto his lard arse, and bouncing up here in these new
newsgroups, as always, for sure.

No surprise that he is so pathetically bitter and twisted about it.

And, I, Rod Speed, am thus psychologically shocked that I was out done by
someone else and now tries to psychologically "compensate" by escalating
my neurotic behavior.

===================================

The "Rod Speed FAQ" read it below or at the URL for yourself.....
- - - - - - - - -
http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Alt/alt.internet.wireless/2006-07/ms
g00462.html
- - - - - - - - - -

After its recent emergence in the thread "How to calculate increase
of home wireless router range?", readers of this group may find
this useful. [based on a post in comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage]


Who or What is Rod Speed?

Rod Speed is an entirely modern phenomenon. Essentially, Rod
Speed is an insecure and worthless individual who has discovered
he can enhance his own self-esteem in his own eyes by playing "the
big, hard man" on the InterNet.

Rod is believed to be from Australia.


Rod certainly posts a lot. Why is that?

It relates back to the point about boosting his own self esteem by
what amounts to effectively having a wank in public. Rod's
personality, as exemplified by his posts, means he is practically
unemployable which means he sits around at home all day festering
away and getting worse and worse. This means he posts more and
more try and boost the old failing self esteem. Being unemployed
also means he as a lot of time on his hands to post in he first
place.


But maybe Rod really is a very clever and knowledgable person?

Clever? His posts wouldn't support that theory. As far as being
knowledgable, well, Rod has posted to various aus newsgroups
including invest, comms, and politics. He has posted to all as a
self professed "expert" and flames any and all who disagree with
him. Logically, here's no way any single individual could be
more than a jack of all trades across such a wide spread of
subject matter.


But maybe Rod really is an expert in some areas?

Possibly. However, his "bedside manner" prevents him from being
taken seriously by most normal people. Also, he has damaged his
credibility in areas where he might know what he's on about by
shooting his self in the foot in areas where he does not. For
example, in the case of subject matter such as politics, even a
view held by Albert Einstein cannot be little more than an
opinion and to vociferously denigrate an opposing opinion is
simply small mindedness and bigotry, the kind of which Einstein
himself fought against his whole life.


What is Rod Speed's main modus operandi?

Simple! He shoots off a half brained opinion in response to any
other post and touts that opinion as fact. When challenged, he
responds with vociferous and rabid denigration. He has an
instantly recognisable set of schoolboy put downs limited pretty
much to the following: "Pathetic, Puerile, Little Boy, try
harder, trivial, more lies, gutless wonder, wanker, etc etc".
The fact that Rod has been unable to come up with any new insults
says a lot about his outlook and intelligence.


But why do so many people respond to Rod in turn?

It has to do with effrontery and a lack of logic. Most people
who post have some basis of reason for what they write and when
Rod retorts with his usual denigration and derision they respond
emotionally rather than logically. It's like a teacher in a
class room who has a misbehaving pupil. The teacher challenges
the pupil to explain himself and the student responds with "***
off, Big Nose!" Even thought the teacher has a fairly normal
proboscis, he gets a dent in his self-esteem and might resort to
an emotional repsonse like "yeah? well your *** wouldn't fill a
pop rivet, punk", which merely invites some oneupmanship from the
naughty pupil. Of course, the teacher should not have justified
the initial comment with a response, especially in front of the
class. The correct response was "please report to the
headmaster's office right NOW!"


What is a "RodBot"?

Some respondents in aus.invest built a "virtual Rod" which was
indiscernable from the "real" Rod. Net users could enter an
opinion or even a fact and the RoDBot would tell them they were
pathetic lying schoolboys who should be able to do better or some
equally pithy Rod Speedism.


Are you saying that Rod Speed is a Troll?

You got it!


What is the best way to handle Rod Speed?

KillFile!

.

Rod Speed

unread,
Jan 24, 2009, 8:07:14 PM1/24/09
to
Some gutless fuckwit psychopath with pathetic psychotic
delusions about being a dog, desperately cowering behind
Stray Dog desperately attempted to bullshit and lie its way out
of its predicament and fooled absolutely no one at all, as always.

No surprise that it got the bums rush, right out the door, onto its lard arse.

No surprise that its so pathetically bitter and twisted about it.


0 new messages