Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
IBM allow free access to quantum processor online
13 views
Skip to first unread message
p-0''0-h the cat (ES)
May 4, 2016, 11:45:24 AM5/4/16
to
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-36203043
Yeah, there's a catch.
Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly.
--
p-0.0-h the cat
Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat,
Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy,
Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath,
the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infâme,
the OVERCAT [The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll,
shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook,
smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag,
liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, scouringerer, jumped up chav,
lycanthropic schizotypal lesbian, the most complete ignoid, joker, and furball.
NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist
Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery.
By Appointment to God Frank-Lin.
Signature integrity check
md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896
JJ
May 5, 2016, 12:59:42 AM5/5/16
to
On Wed, 04 May 2016 16:45:20 +0100, p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote:
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-36203043
>
> Yeah, there's a catch.
And to quote...
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-36203043
>
> Yeah, there's a catch.
"People wishing to access the processors must request an _invitation_
through a web form that asks for a user's institution _details_ and level of
computing experience."
That's practically not for us, consumers and power enthusiasts.
IOTW... USELESS.
p-0''0-h the cat (ES)
May 5, 2016, 7:23:59 AM5/5/16
to
rounds to fire off before lunch and then he'll be right on it.
How are your studies in the mathematics of quantum uncertainty going?
Mr. Man-wai Chang
May 5, 2016, 8:18:49 AM5/5/16
to
On 4/05/2016 11:45 PM, p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote:
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-36203043
> Yeah, there's a catch.
Why do we average computer gamers need it?
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-36203043
> Yeah, there's a catch.
--
@~@ Remain silent. Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you!
/( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.4.8-300.fc23.x86_64
^ ^ 20:15:01 up 3 days 15:28 0 users load average: 1.00 1.01 1.05
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Shadow
May 5, 2016, 9:05:44 AM5/5/16
to
On Wed, 04 May 2016 16:45:20 +0100, "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)"
<super...@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> wrote:
>
>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-36203043
OMG
//Quantum computing instead takes advantage of a mechanic called
superpositioning that allows quantum bits - or "qubits" - to have
values of one, zero, or both at the same time.//
Reminds me of that poor cat they put in the box.
our money, but that's just a detail).
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
<super...@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> wrote:
>
>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-36203043
OMG
//Quantum computing instead takes advantage of a mechanic called
superpositioning that allows quantum bits - or "qubits" - to have
values of one, zero, or both at the same time.//
Reminds me of that poor cat they put in the box.
>
>Yeah, there's a catch.
That the bad guys will use it ? Why not, they funded it (with
>Yeah, there's a catch.
our money, but that's just a detail).
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
JJ
May 5, 2016, 9:13:16 AM5/5/16
to
On Thu, 5 May 2016 20:18:52 +0800, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
> On 4/05/2016 11:45 PM, p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote:
>>
>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-36203043
>> Yeah, there's a catch.
>
> Why do we average computer gamers need it?
"640KB of RAM should be enough for everyone."
> On 4/05/2016 11:45 PM, p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote:
>>
>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-36203043
>> Yeah, there's a catch.
>
> Why do we average computer gamers need it?
Ring a bell?
Which at that time, 4.77MHz computer should be enough for everyone too.
But noooooo... We still want more.
Be it for games or industrials or anything, we'll always want more.
p-0''0-h the cat (ES)
May 5, 2016, 9:32:27 AM5/5/16
to
Scratching dirt. Me, I wanna go visit the stars.
Mr. Man-wai Chang
May 5, 2016, 9:42:01 AM5/5/16
to
On 5/05/2016 9:13 PM, JJ wrote:
>
> "640KB of RAM should be enough for everyone."
>
> Ring a bell?
> Which at that time, 4.77MHz computer should be enough for everyone too.
> But noooooo... We still want more.
> Be it for games or industrials or anything, we'll always want more.
>
Tell me one job average computer users wanna do with quantum computers? ;)
>
> "640KB of RAM should be enough for everyone."
>
> Ring a bell?
> Which at that time, 4.77MHz computer should be enough for everyone too.
> But noooooo... We still want more.
> Be it for games or industrials or anything, we'll always want more.
>
--
@~@ Remain silent. Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you!
/( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.4.8-300.fc23.x86_64
Mr. Man-wai Chang
May 5, 2016, 9:42:52 AM5/5/16
to
On 5/05/2016 9:03 PM, Shadow wrote:
>
> Reminds me of that poor cat they put in the box.
Schrödinger's Cat vs. Pavlov's Dog
>
> Reminds me of that poor cat they put in the box.
http://www.thinkgeek.com/product/ec00/
p-0''0-h the cat (ES)
May 5, 2016, 9:47:38 AM5/5/16
to
On Thu, 5 May 2016 21:42:05 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
<toylet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 5/05/2016 9:13 PM, JJ wrote:
>>
>> "640KB of RAM should be enough for everyone."
>>
>> Ring a bell?
>> Which at that time, 4.77MHz computer should be enough for everyone too.
>> But noooooo... We still want more.
>> Be it for games or industrials or anything, we'll always want more.
>>
>
>Tell me one job average computer users wanna do with quantum computers? ;)
Just one??? Do you lack that much imagination? FFS, the possibilities
<toylet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 5/05/2016 9:13 PM, JJ wrote:
>>
>> "640KB of RAM should be enough for everyone."
>>
>> Ring a bell?
>> Which at that time, 4.77MHz computer should be enough for everyone too.
>> But noooooo... We still want more.
>> Be it for games or industrials or anything, we'll always want more.
>>
>
>Tell me one job average computer users wanna do with quantum computers? ;)
are endless and that doesn't include all the stuff that hasn't been
invented yet.
I want a holodeck for starters.
Mr. Man-wai Chang
May 5, 2016, 10:15:37 AM5/5/16
to
On 5/05/2016 9:47 PM, p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote:
>
> Just one??? Do you lack that much imagination? FFS, the possibilities
> are endless and that doesn't include all the stuff that hasn't been
> invented yet.
> I want a holodeck for starters.
I meant a job that could NOT be done by traditional computers but
>
> Just one??? Do you lack that much imagination? FFS, the possibilities
> are endless and that doesn't include all the stuff that hasn't been
> invented yet.
> I want a holodeck for starters.
quantum ones... :)
--
@~@ Remain silent. Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you!
/( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.4.8-300.fc23.x86_64
p-0''0-h the cat (ES)
May 5, 2016, 5:07:13 PM5/5/16
to
On Thu, 5 May 2016 22:15:39 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
<toylet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 5/05/2016 9:47 PM, p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote:
>>
>> Just one??? Do you lack that much imagination? FFS, the possibilities
>> are endless and that doesn't include all the stuff that hasn't been
>> invented yet.
>> I want a holodeck for starters.
>
>I meant a job that could NOT be done by traditional computers but
>quantum ones... :)
There are very real physical limits to what we can achieve with
<toylet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 5/05/2016 9:47 PM, p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote:
>>
>> Just one??? Do you lack that much imagination? FFS, the possibilities
>> are endless and that doesn't include all the stuff that hasn't been
>> invented yet.
>> I want a holodeck for starters.
>
>I meant a job that could NOT be done by traditional computers but
>quantum ones... :)
conventional technology. The speed of light is one. What's the least
number of atoms we can use to act as a transistor?
In 100 years all this could look like the telegraph.
p-0''0-h the cat (ES)
May 6, 2016, 4:05:50 AM5/6/16
to
On Thu, 05 May 2016 10:03:52 -0300, Shadow <S...@dow.br> wrote:
>On Wed, 04 May 2016 16:45:20 +0100, "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)"
><super...@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> wrote:
>
>>
>>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-36203043
>
>OMG
>//Quantum computing instead takes advantage of a mechanic called
>superpositioning that allows quantum bits - or "qubits" - to have
>values of one, zero, or both at the same time.//
>
> Reminds me of that poor cat they put in the box.
>>
>>Yeah, there's a catch.
>
> That the bad guys will use it ? Why not, they funded it (with
>our money, but that's just a detail).
They also funded TCP/IP, atomic power, the development of antibiotics.
>On Wed, 04 May 2016 16:45:20 +0100, "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)"
><super...@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> wrote:
>
>>
>>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-36203043
>
>OMG
>//Quantum computing instead takes advantage of a mechanic called
>superpositioning that allows quantum bits - or "qubits" - to have
>values of one, zero, or both at the same time.//
>
> Reminds me of that poor cat they put in the box.
>>
>>Yeah, there's a catch.
>
> That the bad guys will use it ? Why not, they funded it (with
>our money, but that's just a detail).
Mr. Man-wai Chang
May 6, 2016, 7:41:12 AM5/6/16
to
On 6/05/2016 5:07 AM, p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote:
> There are very real physical limits to what we can achieve with
> conventional technology. The speed of light is one. What's the least
> number of atoms we can use to act as a transistor?
>
> In 100 years all this could look like the telegraph.
I think consumers OS will just maintain its current look-and-feel! We
> There are very real physical limits to what we can achieve with
> conventional technology. The speed of light is one. What's the least
> number of atoms we can use to act as a transistor?
>
> In 100 years all this could look like the telegraph.
consumers don't really know the differences made by revoluting the CPU
architecture.... :)
--
@~@ Remain silent. Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you!
/( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.4.8-300.fc23.x86_64
p-0''0-h the cat (ES)
May 6, 2016, 7:47:29 AM5/6/16
to
On Fri, 6 May 2016 19:41:09 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
<toylet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 6/05/2016 5:07 AM, p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote:
>> There are very real physical limits to what we can achieve with
>> conventional technology. The speed of light is one. What's the least
>> number of atoms we can use to act as a transistor?
>>
>> In 100 years all this could look like the telegraph.
>
>I think consumers OS will just maintain its current look-and-feel! We
>consumers don't really know the differences made by revoluting the CPU
>architecture.... :)
What current look and feel is that then. You are just blabbering.
<toylet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 6/05/2016 5:07 AM, p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote:
>> There are very real physical limits to what we can achieve with
>> conventional technology. The speed of light is one. What's the least
>> number of atoms we can use to act as a transistor?
>>
>> In 100 years all this could look like the telegraph.
>
>I think consumers OS will just maintain its current look-and-feel! We
>consumers don't really know the differences made by revoluting the CPU
>architecture.... :)
Consumers will buy whatever they choose. You have no imagination
whatsoever.
Mr. Man-wai Chang
May 6, 2016, 7:49:06 AM5/6/16
to
On 6/05/2016 7:47 PM, p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote:
>
> What current look and feel is that then. You are just blabbering.
> Consumers will buy whatever they choose. You have no imagination
> whatsoever.
I don't buy the 3D//VR helmet crap. I am fine with 2D GUI as long as it
>
> What current look and feel is that then. You are just blabbering.
> Consumers will buy whatever they choose. You have no imagination
> whatsoever.
does its jobs. :)
--
@~@ Remain silent. Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you!
/( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.4.8-300.fc23.x86_64
Shadow
May 6, 2016, 8:37:33 AM5/6/16
to
On Thu, 5 May 2016 21:42:54 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
<toylet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 5/05/2016 9:03 PM, Shadow wrote:
>>
>> Reminds me of that poor cat they put in the box.
>
>Schrödinger's Cat vs. Pavlov's Dog
>http://www.thinkgeek.com/product/ec00/
//Plus the feline, if it exists, comes equipped with a box, a
<toylet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 5/05/2016 9:03 PM, Shadow wrote:
>>
>> Reminds me of that poor cat they put in the box.
>
>Schrödinger's Cat vs. Pavlov's Dog
>http://www.thinkgeek.com/product/ec00/
radioactive isotope, and a hammer. You generally don't want to give a
cat tools.//
We give cats Win 10 and put it in the box. Best way to control
it, we KNOW if we've made it braindead thanks to telemetry.
"Out of stock" - damn, an orgasm killer.
Pooh, don't get me all excited then say no. It's a bitchy, er
sorry, I mean catty thing to do.
p-0''0-h the cat (ES)
May 6, 2016, 9:21:16 AM5/6/16
to
On Fri, 6 May 2016 19:49:01 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
<toylet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 6/05/2016 7:47 PM, p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote:
>>
>> What current look and feel is that then. You are just blabbering.
>> Consumers will buy whatever they choose. You have no imagination
>> whatsoever.
>
>I don't buy the 3D//VR helmet crap. I am fine with 2D GUI as long as it
>does its jobs. :)
Well hurrah for you. Is that the limit of your imagination then?
<toylet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 6/05/2016 7:47 PM, p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote:
>>
>> What current look and feel is that then. You are just blabbering.
>> Consumers will buy whatever they choose. You have no imagination
>> whatsoever.
>
>I don't buy the 3D//VR helmet crap. I am fine with 2D GUI as long as it
>does its jobs. :)
p-0''0-h the cat (ES)
May 6, 2016, 9:31:29 AM5/6/16
to
the mathematical uncertainty bits from exevalid.
Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly.
--
p-0.0-h the cat
Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat,
Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy,
Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath,
Shadow
May 6, 2016, 9:42:40 AM5/6/16
to
On Fri, 06 May 2016 14:31:26 +0100, "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)"
<super...@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> wrote:
>On Fri, 06 May 2016 09:36:11 -0300, Shadow <S...@dow.br> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 5 May 2016 21:42:54 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
>><toylet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On 5/05/2016 9:03 PM, Shadow wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Reminds me of that poor cat they put in the box.
>>>
>>>Schrödinger's Cat vs. Pavlov's Dog
>>>http://www.thinkgeek.com/product/ec00/
>>
>>//Plus the feline, if it exists, comes equipped with a box, a
>>radioactive isotope, and a hammer. You generally don't want to give a
>>cat tools.//
>>
>> We give cats Win 10 and put it in the box. Best way to control
>>it, we KNOW if we've made it braindead thanks to telemetry.
>> "Out of stock" - damn, an orgasm killer.
>> Pooh, don't get me all excited then say no. It's a bitchy, er
>>sorry, I mean catty thing to do.
>
>Don't fret. Dusty's quantum emulator is coming! He's already patched in
>the mathematical uncertainty bits from exevalid.
Quick !! Phone Micro$ and tell them you are a CAT. That last
<super...@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> wrote:
>On Fri, 06 May 2016 09:36:11 -0300, Shadow <S...@dow.br> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 5 May 2016 21:42:54 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
>><toylet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On 5/05/2016 9:03 PM, Shadow wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Reminds me of that poor cat they put in the box.
>>>
>>>Schrödinger's Cat vs. Pavlov's Dog
>>>http://www.thinkgeek.com/product/ec00/
>>
>>//Plus the feline, if it exists, comes equipped with a box, a
>>radioactive isotope, and a hammer. You generally don't want to give a
>>cat tools.//
>>
>> We give cats Win 10 and put it in the box. Best way to control
>>it, we KNOW if we've made it braindead thanks to telemetry.
>> "Out of stock" - damn, an orgasm killer.
>> Pooh, don't get me all excited then say no. It's a bitchy, er
>>sorry, I mean catty thing to do.
>
>Don't fret. Dusty's quantum emulator is coming! He's already patched in
>the mathematical uncertainty bits from exevalid.
M$/AI-enhanced statement sounded downright bitchy. They have your
profile all wrong.
Mr. Man-wai Chang
May 6, 2016, 9:43:08 AM5/6/16
to
On 6/05/2016 9:21 PM, p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote:
>
> Well hurrah for you. Is that the limit of your imagination then?
>
No one's imagination is limited.
>
> Well hurrah for you. Is that the limit of your imagination then?
>
Maybe I am too old to accept a VR helmet.... too dangerous, too dark
magic! :)
--
@~@ Remain silent. Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you!
/( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.4.8-300.fc23.x86_64
p-0''0-h the cat (ES)
May 6, 2016, 10:10:40 AM5/6/16
to
Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly.
--
p-0.0-h the cat
Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat,
Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy,
Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath,
Shadow
May 6, 2016, 10:40:45 AM5/6/16
to
On Fri, 06 May 2016 15:10:37 +0100, "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)"
Yep. I messed around with the "Free GPL open source code"
before compiling. They think "I'm a GNU".
<insert youtube link>
[]'s
PS that WAS troll-bait, just in case, well, you know. Cat in a box,
Win 10, brain etc.
before compiling. They think "I'm a GNU".
<insert youtube link>
[]'s
PS that WAS troll-bait, just in case, well, you know. Cat in a box,
Win 10, brain etc.
Betty
May 6, 2016, 10:57:54 AM5/6/16
to
p-0''0-h the cat (ES)
May 6, 2016, 11:00:04 AM5/6/16
to
funny to say. It's 95% perspiration this being a joker business you
know.
p-0''0-h the cat (ES)
May 6, 2016, 11:07:29 AM5/6/16
to
test it yourself? They might be shitting you ;)
p-0''0-h the cat (ES)
May 6, 2016, 11:20:57 AM5/6/16
to
On Fri, 6 May 2016 21:43:02 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
<toylet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 6/05/2016 9:21 PM, p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote:
>>
>> Well hurrah for you. Is that the limit of your imagination then?
>>
>
>No one's imagination is limited.
Hello, stop watching daytime TV. It's making a moron out of you. Self
<toylet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 6/05/2016 9:21 PM, p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote:
>>
>> Well hurrah for you. Is that the limit of your imagination then?
>>
>
>No one's imagination is limited.
evidently everyone's imagination is limited. Some more than others.
>Maybe I am too old to accept a VR helmet.... too dangerous, too dark
>magic! :)
Shadow
May 6, 2016, 11:29:55 AM5/6/16
to
On Fri, 06 May 2016 09:57:41 -0500, Betty <howdy@all.y'all> wrote:
But thanks for the warning, Betty.
[]'s
PS Designing my "quantum light saber" TM. Unfortunately, I haven't had
time to think about it. But it MIGHT do the job, specially after they
discover that quantum particles are not trinary, they're trexadecimal.
Betty
May 6, 2016, 5:25:47 PM5/6/16
to
p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote:
> On Fri, 06 May 2016 09:57:41 -0500, Betty <howdy@all.y'all> wrote:
>
>> Shadow wrote:
>>> On Thu, 5 May 2016 21:42:54 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
>>> <toylet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/05/2016 9:03 PM, Shadow wrote:
>>>>> Reminds me of that poor cat they put in the box.
>>>> Schrödinger's Cat vs. Pavlov's Dog
>>>> http://www.thinkgeek.com/product/ec00/
>>> //Plus the feline, if it exists, comes equipped with a box, a
>>> radioactive isotope, and a hammer. You generally don't want to give a
>>> cat tools.//
>>>
>>> We give cats Win 10 and put it in the box. Best way to control
>>> it, we KNOW if we've made it braindead thanks to telemetry.
>>> "Out of stock" - damn, an orgasm killer.
>>> Pooh, don't get me all excited then say no. It's a bitchy, er
>>> sorry, I mean catty thing to do.
>>> []'s
>>
>> https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn26111-schrodingers-cat-caught-on-quantum-film
>
> Thanks for posting that Betty. That's the coolest thing ever. Did you
> test it yourself? They might be shitting you ;)
>
> Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly.
>
You're welcome! I think *you*should test it, that cat may be a long-lost
> On Fri, 06 May 2016 09:57:41 -0500, Betty <howdy@all.y'all> wrote:
>
>> Shadow wrote:
>>> On Thu, 5 May 2016 21:42:54 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
>>> <toylet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/05/2016 9:03 PM, Shadow wrote:
>>>>> Reminds me of that poor cat they put in the box.
>>>> Schrödinger's Cat vs. Pavlov's Dog
>>>> http://www.thinkgeek.com/product/ec00/
>>> //Plus the feline, if it exists, comes equipped with a box, a
>>> radioactive isotope, and a hammer. You generally don't want to give a
>>> cat tools.//
>>>
>>> We give cats Win 10 and put it in the box. Best way to control
>>> it, we KNOW if we've made it braindead thanks to telemetry.
>>> "Out of stock" - damn, an orgasm killer.
>>> Pooh, don't get me all excited then say no. It's a bitchy, er
>>> sorry, I mean catty thing to do.
>>> []'s
>>
>> https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn26111-schrodingers-cat-caught-on-quantum-film
>
> Thanks for posting that Betty. That's the coolest thing ever. Did you
> test it yourself? They might be shitting you ;)
>
> Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly.
>
relative.
--
.
Betty
May 6, 2016, 5:32:32 PM5/6/16
to
--
.
0 new messages